Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone on brain metabolism in dogs assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)

  • Franz Josef Söbbeler1Email author,
  • Inés Carrera2,
  • Kirby Pasloske3,
  • Millagahamada Gedara Ranasinghe3,
  • Patrick Kircher2 and
  • Sabine Beate Rita Kästner1
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201814:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1396-1

Received: 25 March 2017

Accepted: 27 February 2018

Published: 5 March 2018

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone on the canine brain metabolite bioprofile, measured with single voxel short echo time proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. Ten adult healthy Beagle dogs were assigned to receive isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone at 3 different dose rates each in a randomized cross-over study design. Doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone were FE’Iso 1.7 vol%, 2.1 vol%, 2.8 vol%, FE’Sevo 2.8 vol%, 3.5 vol% and 4.7 vol%, 30, 45 and 60 mg kg− 1 h− 1 and 10, 15 and 20 mg kg− 1 h− 1 respectively. A single voxel Point Resolved Spectroscopy Sequence was performed on a 3 T MRI scanner in three brain regions (basal ganglia, parietal and occipital lobes). Spectral data were analyzed with LCModel. Concentration of total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), choline, creatine, inositol and glutamine and glutamate complex (Glx) relative to water content was obtained. Plasma concentration of lactate, glucose, triglycerides, propofol and alfaxalone were determined. Statistics were performed using repeated measures ANOVA or Wilcoxon Sign Rank test with alpha = 5%.

Results

Plasma glucose increased with isoflurane, sevoflurane and alfaxalone but decreased with propofol. Plasma lactate increased with all anesthetics (isoflurane > sevoflurane > propofol > alfaxalone). Cerebral lactate could not be detected. Only minor changes in cerebral metabolite concentrations of tNAA, choline, inositol, creatine and Glx occurred with anesthetic dose changes.

Conclusion

The metabolomic profile detected with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla of canine brain showed only minor differences between doses and anesthetics related to tNAA, choline, creatine, inositol and Glx.

Keywords

AnesthesiaLactateGlucoseMRICerebralPRESSPlasmaLcModelCanine

Background

Injectable as well as volatile anesthetics influence cerebral metabolism. The classic paradigm that neuronal activity ≈ metabolism ≈ blood flow has been used to study the effect of anesthetics on brain metabolism. Positron Emission Tomography studies with 2-deoxy-2(18F)fluoro-D-glucose to determine the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglu) as an indirect measure of neuronal activity [1] found a consistent suppression of CMRglu under isoflurane, sevoflurane and propofol with varying impact on different brain regions in man [26]. Cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen is also reduced by sevoflurane, propofol, isoflurane and also Althesin® (a combination of 9 mg mL− 1 alfaxalone- and 3 mg mL− 1 alfadolone acetate) [79]. In microdialysis studies in rodents [10, 11] volatile anesthetics led to a rapid and dose-dependent increase in cerebral lactate levels without changes in cerebral glucose levels. Ketamine/xylazine, and chloral hydrate moderately increased cerebral lactate, but cerebral glucose levels rose markedly. Both propofol and pentobarbital did not affect cerebral lactate levels and only propofol led to a minor increase in cerebral glucose.

Brain metabolism can also be investigated by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique that allows the determination of the biochemical composition of the brain in vivo for accurate identification and quantification of metabolites in localized brain regions [1214]. With proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) at 3 Tesla several metabolites can be identified in the normal brain, such as N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline, creatine, myo-inositol, and sum of glutamate and glutamine (Glx) [1518]. At > 7 Tesla, the spectral differentiation between the glutamine and glutamate is complete, and other smaller metabolites like glucose and GABA are well depicted [19, 20].

Several 1H MRS studies have been performed to investigate metabolism within the brain under general anesthesia in rodents [21, 22], monkeys [23], humans [24] and dogs [25]. The main findings of these studies [2124] were the increase in cerebral lactate under the dose-dependent influence of volatile anesthetics independent of plasma lactate [2123]. They also found increases in other cerebral metabolites, especially glutamate, alanine and creatine. These changes have been shown to be fully reversible within minutes after completion of the anesthesia [21]. On the other hand, the injectable anesthetics and premedication drugs ketamine/medetomidine, medetomidine, pentobarbital, fentanyl, diazepam and propofol did not influence cerebral lactate concentration [21, 22].

In veterinary medicine, clinical MRI can only be performed under general anesthesia. Recently, relative metabolite concentrations and their ratios in the brain of healthy beagle dogs under general anesthesia have been published [1517], as well as a few clinical studies [26, 27] using different anesthetic protocols. Since the influence of anesthetics on the canine brain bioprofile at 3 Tesla is actually not known, the purpose of the study reported here was to determine the possible effects of the commonly used anesthetics isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone on canine brain bioprofile assessed with single voxel short echo time proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at a field strength of 3.0 Tesla. Secondary aim of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of the anesthetics on plasma levels of lactate and glucose.

Our hypothesis was that volatile anesthetics isoflurane and sevoflurane, but not the injectable anesthetics propofol and alfaxalone, cause a dose-dependent increase in cerebral lactate. Furthermore, we hypothesized an increase in cerebral levels of creatine and glutamate under influence of volatile anesthetics compared to the injectable anesthetics propofol and alfaxalone. Regional differences in cerebral metabolites were anticipated to be independent of anesthetics.

Methods

All animal procedures were performed according to the German animal protection law after review and approval by the ethical committee for animal experimentation of the Federal State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety of Lower Saxony, Germany (3392 42,502–04-13/1252).

Animals

Ten purpose-bred (purpose bred at our own institution) adult Beagle dogs (8 neutered males and 2 spayed females) were included in the study. Age ranged from 32 to 91 month (mean ± SD, 50.7 ± 22.2 months) and the weight ranged from 11 to 21.8 kg (mean ± SD, 16.5 kg ± 3.2).

The dogs were housed in groups of 5 to 6 dogs per group with daily periods in enriched outside runs and regular walking by veterinary students. Ambient temperature is regulated to 18–21 °C. The dogs received commercial dog food (Hills VetEssentials Canine adult) according to body weight, twice daily except on study days.

Health status of the dogs was confirmed by a clinical and neurological examination and complete blood count and blood chemistry. Physical status was classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system as ASA I.

Study design

The study was performed as a randomized, experimental trial in a complete cross-over design with four treatments [isoflurane (I), sevoflurane (S), propofol (P), alfaxalone (A)] and a wash out period of at least 14 days between treatments.

Instrumentation

All dogs were fasted overnight, water was available until the trial started. Blood was drawn from the jugular vein for analysis of blood gases, electrolytes, plasma lactate, plasma glucose and plasma triglycerides. A peripheral venous catheter was placed into the cephalic or lateral saphenous vein for induction and maintenance of anesthesia (treatment P and A) and cardiovascular support (treatment I, S, P, A). A central venous catheter was placed into the right or left jugular vein for blood sampling. All dogs were wrapped in self-made bubble wrap vests equipped with 41 °C warm gel heat pads for temperature management. Earplugs were used for noise protection.

Anesthetic protocol

In treatment I and S dogs were induced by mask with 5% isoflurane (Isofluran CP®, CP-Pharma) or 6% sevoflurane (SevoFlo®, EcuPhar GmbH) in 100% oxygen with a flow of 8 L min− 1. In treatment P and A, induction took place with 10 mg kg− 1 propofol (Narcofol®, 10 mg mL− 1, CP Pharma) or 3 mg kg− 1 alfaxalone (Alfaxan®, 10 mg mL− 1, Jurox Pty Ltd) injected over a period of 60 s. Isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone were administered in three different doses. At each dose, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic measurements were performed. A 30 min equilibration period was allowed before each measurement was conducted. The order and doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane were 2.1 vol%/2.8 vol%/1.7 vol% and 3.5 vol%/4.7 vol%/2.8 vol%, respectively, representing 1.5 MAC, 2 MAC and 1.2 MAC (1 MACISO = 1.39 vol% and 1 MACSEVO = 2.36 vol% according to T Kazama and K Ikeda [28], values above are calculated and rounded, respectively). For propofol and alfaxalone, doses were 30 mg kg− 1 h− 1, 45 mg kg− 1 h− 1, 60 mg kg− 1 h− 1 and 10 mg kg− 1 h− 1, 15 mg kg− 1 h− 1, 20 mg kg− 1 h− 1, respectively (Fig. 1). These anesthetics were administered as an incremental increase in dose rate to try and avoid period to period interaction with the possible accumulation of the injectable anesthetics.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Schematic timeline for propofol and alfaxalone (a) and isoflurane and sevoflurane (b) The 30 min equilibration phase was followed by a measurement period of approximately 30 min where a total of three measurements were performed (BG, PL and OL). For treatment I and S the end expiratory concentration had to be adjusted before each equilibration phase. Jugular venous blood samples were taken for serum glucose, lactate and plasma concentrations of propofol and alfaxalone

After induction, intubation and instrumentation the animals were placed in sternal recumbency in the MRI scanner and the first equilibration phase started (in treatment I and S additional time was needed to adjust the end-expiratory concentration before each equilibration phase). Volume-controlled intermittent positive pressure ventilation was adjusted to maintain end tidal CO2 in the eucapnic range of 35 and 45 mmHg. Measurements included pulse rate, SpO2, PE’CO2, respiratory rate, inspiratory and expiratory isoflurane-, sevoflurane- and oxygen concentrations and body temperature.

For cardiovascular support a buffered balanced electrolyte solution (Sterofundin®) and 6% HES 130/0.42 (Venofundin® 6% HES) at a rate of 5 mL kg− 1 h− 1 dobutamine 3 μg kg− 1 min− 1 was administered to support cardiac output. Infusion rates of Sterofundin® were reduced with increasing infusion volume of injectable anesthetics, respectively.

The dogs were recovered in a quiet environment and warmed until physiologic body temperature was reached. They were returned into their group on the following day.

Blood sampling

Blood samples for plasma lactate, plasma triglycerides, blood gases and plasma glucose were taken after each measurement period via the central venous catheter. In Treatment P and A, additional blood was taken for plasma concentrations of propofol and alfaxalone at the end of each measurement period before increasing the dose rate (Fig. 1). Plasma glucose concentration (Reflovet® Plus – Roche; reflexionphotometric measurement) and blood gases (ABL80 FLEX – Radiometer GMBH; amperometric/potentiometric measurement) were measured immediately whereas blood samples for plasma lactate, plasma triglycerides and plasma concentrations of propofol and alfaxalone were centrifuged at 11,800 rpm for 2 min, plasma was separated and immediately stored at − 82 °C until analyzed. Plasma lactate and plasma triglycerides were analyzed via absorption photometric measurement (cobas c311 – Roche Hitachi). Propofol plasma concentrations were quantified by means of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC/MS) after solid-phase extraction and alfaxalone plasma concentrations were determined with liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) after solid phase extraction [29].

Imaging protocol

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3.0 T Philips Achieva MRI scanner (Philips MedicalSystems, Best, the Netherlands) with a 8-channel receive-transmit knee coil (Philips MedicalSystems, Best, the Netherlands). For morphological imaging of the brain, transverse, dorsal, and sagittal turbo spin echo T2-weighted images were performed. Scan parameters were as follow: echo time, 80 milliseconds; repetition time, 3000 milliseconds; turbo spin factor, 15; matrix, 256 × 204; slice thickness, 3 mm; number of signal averages, 1. These images were performed during the first 30 min equilibration phase to reduce total time of anesthesia.

Single voxel 1H MRS was performed by one of the investigators (FS) by use of short-echo time point resolved technique (PRESS) with voxels graphically prescribed from the T2-weighted images. Volume samples were performed over various regions of the brain parenchyma, including left basal ganglia (voxel of interest 1.5 cm3), left parietal lobe (voxel of interest 1.95 cm3), and midline occipital lobe (voxel of interest 1.5 cm3) (Fig. 2). Only the left hemisphere was analyzed, based on a previously reported study, in which differences in the metabolite concentration between left and right hemispheres were not found in the canine brain [15]. Parameters for the 1H MRS technique were as follow: echo time, shortest possible (32–34 milliseconds – usually 32 milliseconds in occipital lobe and 33 milliseconds in basal ganglia and parietal lobe); repetition time, 2000 milliseconds; number of sample averages, 256; bandwidth, 2000 Hz. Care was taken to avoid cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral soft and bony tissues to prevent lipid contamination. Before each 1H MRS acquisition, field homogeneity was optimized with a second-order automatic pencil-beam shim, which was followed by water suppression techniques (excitation). A water-unsuppressed image was also acquired to serve as a concentration reference for quantifying metabolite concentrations. In addition to a typical shim time of 2 min, each examination was acquired in 8 min and 36 s. Rejection criteria for the 1H MRS data were presence of an unstable baseline, line width > 10 Hz, signal-to-noise ratio < 6, presence of artifacts, or presence of lipid contamination.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

T2 weighted images of the brain of one beagle dog. Transversal (left), dorsal (middle), parasagittal (right; a and b) or sagittal (right; c) view; The red rectangles display the 1H MRS voxels of interests (VOI) for left basal ganglia (a), left parietal lobe (b) and midline occipital lobe (c)

Data processing

Metabolite concentrations were estimated with an automated data processing spectral fitting (linear combination model) algorithm (LCModel). The software automatically adjusted the phase and chemical shift of the spectra, estimated the baseline, and performed eddy current correction. Relative metabolite concentrations and their uncertainties were estimated by fitting the spectrum to a basis set of spectra acquired from individual metabolites in solution. Seventeen metabolites were included in the linear combination model (alanine, aspartate, glucose, creatine, phosphocreatine, glutamine, glutamate, glycerophosphocholine, phosphocholine, lactate, lipids, myoinositol, N-acetylaspartate, N-acetylaspartylglutamate, scylloinositol, glutathione, and taurine). Only those metabolites with CRLBs < 20% were evaluated in this study.

One investigator (FS) reviewed MRI and 1H MRS images. The MRI images were assessed for abnormalities such as changes in signal intensity of the gray and white matter, presence of space-occupying lesions, mass effect, or ventriculomegaly. Metabolite concentrations relative to water and metabolite ratios with creatine as a reference were calculated from the 1H MRS data.

Statistical analysis

No comparable study on cerebral has been performed in dogs, so that a priori power analysis for calculation of sample size was based on the effect size from Jacob et al. 2012 performed in humans using a power of 90% and an alpha of 0.05.

Data were analyzed with aid of statistical software SAS Enterprise Guide (Version 6.1 M1, for Windows, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and Q-Q plots were used to test distribution of the data. Effect on cerebral metabolite concentrations were analyzed using a repeated measure ANOVA. This was performed for metabolite concentration relative to brain water content itself as well as for calculated metabolite ratios with creatine as internal reference metabolite.

Pearson’s correlations were performed to investigate the possible effect of plasma concentrations on metabolite concentrations and the effect of plasma sodium concentration on total NAA and inositol. Arithmetic mean of metabolite concentrations of the three doses for each anesthetic was calculated followed by a repeated measure ANOVA for determination of anesthetic effect. For differences of cerebral metabolite concentrations between investigated brain regions a repeated measures ANOVA for first measurement (equivalent to the second dose) in treatment S was performed. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for pulse rate, body temperature, plasma levels of lactate, glucose and triglycerides blood gas values as well as plasma drug concentrations. Bonferroni alpha adjustment for correction of alpha-error accumulation was applied when appropriate. Level of significance was set at alpha = 5%. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

The T2-weighted images revealed no morphological abnormalities. Out of 360 planned measurements (10 dogs × 4 treatments × 3 doses × 3 brain regions) 348 spectra were obtained. Inadequate anesthesia led to abortion of trial in three dogs (two dogs receiving isoflurane 1.7 vol% (1.2 MAC) and in one dog receiving propofol only measurements at a rate of 45 mg kg− 1 h− 1 could be performed). Four spectroscopic measurements were discarded from isoflurane treatment due to insufficient signal-to-noise ratio (BG 2.8 vol% & 1.7 vol% and OL 2.1 vol% & 2.8 vol% - 4 measurements). In total, 344 spectra were included in the study. All spectra included were of good quality with a signal-to-noise-ratio (mean ± SD) of 14.07 ± 5.66 and linewidths (mean ± SD) of 4.75 ± 2.37 Hz. Example spectra of all three brain regions of one dog undergoing treatment I are shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Example 1HMRS spectra of basal ganglia (a) parietal lobe (b) and occipital lobe (c) in one dog receiving 1.5 MAC (2.1 vol%) isoflurane. The x-axis represents the chemical shift in ppm of each metabolite and the y-axis represents the signal intensity

Changes in metabolite concentration relative to brain water content between the investigated brain regions followed the same trend with all anesthetics and are exemplary listed for the first measurement (equivalent to second Dose) in treatment S only (mean ± SD displayed in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Creatine concentration differed between all three brain regions. The lowest concentration in parietal lobe differed to the highest in occipital lobe (p < 0.0001) and to basal ganglia (p = 0.0001). Occipital lobe differed also to basal ganglia (p = 0.00156). Glx was lower in parietal lobe compared to basal ganglia (p = 0.0045) and occipital lobe (p = 0.041). N-acetylaspartate is lowest in basal ganglia being significant to the highest concentration in occipital lobe (p = 0.0445). The ratio to creatine was higher in parietal lobe compared to basal ganglia (p < 0.0001) and occipital lobe (p < 0.0001). Total choline was higher in in basal ganglia compared to parietal (p < 0.0001) and occipital lobes (p < 0.0001) but the ratio in occipital lobe was lowest compared to basal ganglia (p < 0.0001) and parietal lobe (p < 0.0001). Myoinositol ratios to creatine were higher in parietal lobe compared to basal ganglia (p = 0.0064) and occipital lobe (p = 0.0002).
Table 1

Mean ± SD of Glx concentrations (mmol L-1 of brain water) and Glx/tCr ratios

 

Dose 1

Dose 2

Dose 3

Arithmetic mean

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

GLX

BG

Isoflurane

13.568 ± 1.196

13.017 ± 1.037

13.039 ± 1.703

13.146 ± 1.003

Sevoflurane

12.532 ± 1.369

12.931 ± 1.156

13.226 ± 1.266

12.896 ± 1.005

Propofol

12.388 ± 1.066

12.730 ± 1.191

12.839 ± 1.582

12.760 ± 1.105

Alfaxalone

12.941 ± 1.353

13.133 ± 1.670

13.423 ± 1.756

13.166 ± 1.233

PL

Isoflurane

11.831 ± 2.167AB

13.119 ± 1.695A

11.821 ± 1.911B

12.345 ± 1.6741

Sevoflurane

11.189 ± 1.375

10.632 ± 1.301

10.767 ± 0.888

10.863 ± 0.99712

Propofol

10.201 ± 1.818

10.165 ± 1.669

10.481 ± 2.286

10.295 ± 1.7222

Alfaxalone

10.087 ± 2.052

10.766 ± 2.084

10.315 ± 1.418

10.390 ± 1.3532

OL

Isoflurane

12.957 ± 1.341

12.263 ± 1.648

13.083 ± 1.845

12.913 ± 1.463

Sevoflurane

12.869 ± 2.277

12.311 ± 1.752

12.700 ± 1.539

12.627 ± 1.694

Propofol

12.043 ± 0.400

12.135 ± 0.809

12.587 ± 1.289

12.223 ± 0.646

Alfaxalone

12.555 ± 1.586

12.320 ± 1.075

12.609 ± 1.055

12.495 ± 1.032

GLX/tCr

BG

Isoflurane

2.326 ± 0.136

2.118 ± 0.144

2.215 ± 0.416

2.196 ± 0.214

Sevoflurane

2.082 ± 0.221

2.032 ± 0.185

2.117 ± 0.180

2.077 ± 0.127

Propofol

2.082 ± 0.199

2.109 ± 0.153

2.136 ± 0.216

2.119 ± 0.141

Alfaxalone

2.045 ± 0.182

2.082 ± 0.232

2.091 ± 0.290

2.073 ± 0.175

PL

Isoflurane

2.177 ± 0.365

2.353 ± 0.352

2.110 ± 0.342

2.224 ± 0.306

Sevoflurane

2.064 ± 0.265

1.908 ± 0.240

1.932 ± 0.178

1.968 ± 0.197

Propofol

1.826 ± 0.385

1.858 ± 0.388

1.931 ± 0.516

1.865 ± 0.396

Alfaxalone

1.857 ± 0.365

2.001 ± 0.451

1.915 ± 0.242

1.924 ± 0.272

OL

Isoflurane

1.964 ± 0.302

1.800 ± 0.243

2.028 ± 0.278

1.984 ± 0.287

Sevoflurane

1.914 ± 0.353

1.810 ± 0.300

1.870 ± 0.240

1.864 ± 0.282

Propofol

1.777 ± 0.063

1.838 ± 0.147

1.834 ± 0.156

1.839 ± 0.131

Alfaxalone

1.868 ± 0.280

1.839 ± 0.213

1.922 ± 0.193

1.877 ± 0.220

Mean ± SD for the three different doses and the arithmetic mean of the three doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone in basal ganglia (BG), parietal lobe (PL) and occipital lobe (OL). Different alphabetical superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) between different doses of each anesthetic and different numerical superscripts differ significantly between arithmetic mean Glx concentrations of each anesthetic. For treatment I and S: Dose 1 time 3; Dose 2 time 1; Dose 3 time 2

Table 2

Mean ± SD of tNAA concentrations (mmol L-1 of brain water) and tNAA/tCr ratios

 

Dose 1

Dose 2

Dose 3

Arithmetic mean

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

tNAA

BG

Isoflurane

6.911 ± 0.753

7.318 ± 0.425

6.955 ± 0.387

7.094 ± 0.339

Sevoflurane

7.100 ± 0.548

7.297 ± 0.554

7.219 ± 0.512

7.205 ± 0.509

Propofol

7.288 ± 0.484AB

7.007 ± 0.466A

7.524 ± 0.618B

7.226 ± 0.444

Alfaxalone

7.104 ± 0.472A

7.499 ± 0.410AB

7.724 ± 0.541B

7.442 ± 0.376

PL

Isoflurane

7.485 ± 0.585

7.692 ± 0.379

7.575 ± 0.360

7.583 ± 0.321

Sevoflurane

7.664 ± 0.490

7.631 ± 0.690

7.673 ± 0.526

7.656 ± 0.540

Propofol

7.622 ± 0.538

7.592 ± 0.617

7.667 ± 0.528

7.595 ± 0.516

Alfaxalone

7.681 ± 0.364

7.704 ± 0.376

7.805 ± 0.449

7.730 ± 0.282

OL

Isoflurane

7.725 ± 0.309

7.898 ± 0.497

7.599 ± 0.934

7.696 ± 0.556

Sevoflurane

7.788 ± 0.642

7.907 ± 0.496

7.837 ± 0.492

7.844 ± 0.494

Propofol

7.859 ± 0.393

7.741 ± 0.490

7.628 ± 0.398

7.687 ± 0.432

Alfaxalone

7.680 ± 0.472

7.675 ± 0.559

7.426 ± 0.724

7.594 ± 0.498

tNAA/tCr

BG

Isoflurane

1.187 ± 0.126

1.195 ± 0.095

1.212 ± 0.108

1.203 ± 0.095

Sevoflurane

1.183 ± 0.125

1.148 ± 0.108

1.157 ± 0.086

1.163 ± 0.099

Propofol

1.229 ± 0.100

1.166 ± 0.117

1.255 ± 0.102

1.205 ± 0.107

Alfaxalone

1.126 ± 0.098

1.272 ± 0.238

1.202 ± 0.105

1.200 ± 0.110

PL

Isoflurane

1.381 ± 0.100

1.377 ± 0.103

1.349 ± 0.071

1.365 ± 0.065

Sevoflurane

1.416 ± 0.134

1.369 ± 0.108

1.381 ± 0.083

1.389 ± 0.095

Propofol

1.361 ± 0.151

1.382 ± 0.172

1.404 ± 0.174

1.370 ± 0.159

Alfaxalone

1.419 ± 0.135

1.429 ± 0.134

1.450 ± 0.130

1.433 ± 0.119

OL

Isoflurane

1.167 ± 0.078

1.158 ± 0.047

1.170 ± 0.053

1.175 ± 0.066

Sevoflurane

1.157 ± 0.093

1.158 ± 0.052

1.153 ± 0.069

1.156 ± 0.063

Propofol

1.160 ± 0.054AB

1.171 ± 0.060A

1.113 ± 0.052B

1.156 ± 0.054

Alfaxalone

1.137 ± 0.076

1.144 ± 0.089

1.127 ± 0.064

1.136 ± 0.064

Mean ± SD for the three different doses and the arithmetic mean of the three doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone in basal ganglia (BG), parietal lobe (PL) and occipital lobe (OL). Different alphabetical superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) between different doses of each anesthetic

Table 3

Mean ± SD of tCh concentrations (mmol L-1 of brain water) and tCh/tCr ratios

 

Dose 1

Dose 2

Dose 3

Arithmetic mean

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

tCh

BG

Isoflurane

1.887 ± 0.112A

2.079 ± 0.110

1.932 ± 0.166A

1.969 ± 0.0891

Sevoflurane

1.971 ± 0.109A

2.107 ± 0.145B

2.068 ± 0.128AB

2.049 ± 0.10312

Propofol

2.034 ± 0.118

2.015 ± 0.109

2.010 ± 0.139

2.026 ± 0.09012

Alfaxalone

2.069 ± 0.103

2.082 ± 0.105

2.108 ± 0.123

2.086 ± 0.0802

PL

Isoflurane

1.805 ± 0.180A

1.885 ± 0.129B

1.841 ± 0.132AB

1.843 ± 0.134

Sevoflurane

1.721 ± 0.107A

1.806 ± 0.100B

1.747 ± 0.133AB

1.758 ± 0.101

Propofol

1.843 ± 0.117

1.773 ± 0.233

1.788 ± 0.204

1.768 ± 0.218

Alfaxalone

1.854 ± 0.103

1.822 ± 0.107

1.814 ± 0.162

1.830 ± 0.112

OL

Isoflurane

1.616 ± 0.288

1.805 ± 0.121

1.667 ± 0.202

1.653 ± 0.2581

Sevoflurane

1.707 ± 0.148A

1.807 ± 0.094B

1.768 ± 0.132AB

1.761 ± 0.11812

Propofol

1.795 ± 0.122

1.831 ± 0.122

1.832 ± 0.116

1.823 ± 0.1052

Alfaxalone

1.812 ± 0.140

1.802 ± 0.102

1.789 ± 0.092

1.801 ± 0.09712

tCh/tCr

BG

Isoflurane

0.324 ± 0.021

0.339 ± 0.017

0.331 ± 0.043

0.330 ± 0.027

Sevoflurane

0.329 ± 0.033

0.332 ± 0.031

0.331 ± 0.020

0.330 ± 0.025

Propofol

0.342 ± 0.017

0.335 ± 0.025

0.335 ± 0.024

0.337 ± 0.020

Alfaxalone

0.328 ± 0.020

0.331 ± 0.018

0.328 ± 0.017

0.329 ± 0.016

PL

Isoflurane

0.334 ± 0.039

0.338 ± 0.030

0.329 ± 0.029

0.332 ± 0.030

Sevoflurane

0.318 ± 0.033

0.324 ± 0.021

0.313 ± 0.023

0.319 ± 0.022

Propofol

0.329 ± 0.031

0.322 ± 0.047

0.325 ± 0.028

0.318 ± 0.043

Alfaxalone

0.342 ± 0.032

0.337 ± 0.027

0.338 ± 0.040

0.339 ± 0.030

OL

Isoflurane

0.242 ± 0.031A

0.265 ± 0.010B

0.257 ± 0.008AB

0.251 ± 0.026

Sevoflurane

0.253 ± 0.020

0.265 ± 0.015

0.260 ± 0.023

0.260 ± 0.018

Propofol

0.265 ± 0.014

0.278 ± 0.028

0.268 ± 0.023

0.275 ± 0.027

Alfaxalone

0.268 ± 0.018

0.268 ± 0.016

0.273 ± 0.019

0.270 ± 0.015

Mean ± SD for the three different doses and the arithmetic mean of the three doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone in basal ganglia (BG), parietal lobe (PL) and occipital lobe (OL). Different alphabetical superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) between different doses of each anesthetic different numerical superscripts differ significantly between arithmetic mean tCh concentrations of each anesthetic

Table 4

Mean ± SD of Ins concentrations (mmol/L of brain water) and Ins/tCr ratios

 

Dose 1

Dose 2

Dose 3

Arithmetic mean

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Ins

BG

Isoflurane

7.931 ± 0.343

7.983 ± 0.589

7.730 ± 0.824

7.876 ± 0.529

Sevoflurane

8.365 ± 0.816

8.470 ± 0.780

8.344 ± 0.710

8.393 ± 0.701

Propofol

8.033 ± 0.561

8.056 ± 0.778

8.109 ± 0.646

8.100 ± 0.601

Alfaxalone

8.325 ± 0.606

8.446 ± 0.689

8.605 ± 0.487

8.459 ± 0.470

PL

Isoflurane

7.679 ± 0.996

8.176 ± 0.861

8.070 ± 0.716

8.016 ± 0.835

Sevoflurane

8.165 ± 0.445

8.367 ± 0.528

8.131 ± 0.485

8.221 ± 0.414

Propofol

8.178 ± 1.075

7.976 ± 1.266

7.833 ± 1.439

7.992 ± 1.196

Alfaxalone

7.967 ± 1.103

8.177 ± 1.078

8.188 ± 0.888

8.111 ± 0.954

OL

Isoflurane

8.005 ± 0.885

8.233 ± 0.871

8.077 ± 1.171

8.016 ± 1.087

Sevoflurane

8.362 ± 0.620

8.588 ± 0.554

8.342 ± 0.677

8.431 ± 0.579

Propofol

8.382 ± 0.611

8.455 ± 0.749

8.336 ± 0.593

8.501 ± 0.752

Alfaxalone

8.524 ± 0.649

8.449 ± 0.629

8.523 ± 0.572

8.499 ± 0.591

Ins/tCr

BG

Isoflurane

1.365 ± 0.114

1.299 ± 0.082

1.331 ± 0.100

1.326 ± 0.075

Sevoflurane

1.389 ± 0.132

1.333 ± 0.137

1.336 ± 0.095

1.353 ± 0.103

Propofol

1.351 ± 0.124

1.335 ± 0.112

1.353 ± 0.114

1.307 ± 0.167

Alfaxalone

1.319 ± 0.108

1.334 ± 0.099

1.340 ± 0.110

1.331 ± 0.081

PL

Isoflurane

1.417 ± 0.173

1.462 ± 0.145

1.439 ± 0.112

1.443 ± 0.136

Sevoflurane

1.510 ± 0.135

1.502 ± 0.084

1.457 ± 0.121

1.490 ± 0.107

Propofol

1.459 ± 0.221

1.451 ± 0.266

1.431 ± 0.271

1.440 ± 0.242

Alfaxalone

1.462 ± 0.214

1.509 ± 0.215

1.525 ± 0.211

1.498 ± 0.200

OL

Isoflurane

1.203 ± 0.081

1.205 ± 0.092

1.245 ± 0.113

1.220 ± 0.103

Sevoflurane

1.242 ± 0.090

1.258 ± 0.077

1.228 ± 0.115

1.243 ± 0.089

Propofol

1.235 ± 0.056

1.287 ± 0.197

1.120 ± 0.326

1.256 ± 0.232

Alfaxalone

1.262 ± 0.098

1.259 ± 0.100

1.304 ± 0.160

1.275 ± 0.113

Mean ± SD for the three different doses and the arithmetic mean of the three doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone in basal ganglia (BG), parietal lobe (PL) and occipital lobe (OL).

Table 5

Mean ± SD of tCr concentrations (mmol L-1 of brain water)

 

Dose 1

Dose 2

Dose 3

Arithmetic mean

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

tCr

BG

Isoflurane

5.857 ± 0.647

6.154 ± 0.400

5.699 ± 0.657

5.925 ± 0.4981

Sevoflurane

6.038 ± 0.486A

6.371 ± 0.338B

6.249 ± 0.353AB

6.219 ± 0.34412

Propofol

5.958 ± 0.230

6.043 ± 0.496

6.011 ± 0.451

6.026 ± 0.32812

Alfaxalone

6.320 ± 0.218

6.310 ± 0.439

6.446 ± 0.429

6.359 ± 0.2832

PL

Isoflurane

5.419 ± 0.180

5.598 ± 0.303

5.607 ± 0.210

5.556 ± 0.200

Sevoflurane

5.441 ± 0.460

5.580 ± 0.383

5.584 ± 0.304

5.535 ± 0.347

Propofol

5.627 ± 0.312

5.531 ± 0.407

5.494 ± 0.394

5.576 ± 0.342

Alfaxalone

5.439 ± 0.350

5.420 ± 0.358

5.402 ± 0.491

5.420 ± 0.376

OL

Isoflurane

6.647 ± 0.482

6.825 ± 0.371

6.496 ± 0.758

6.566 ± 0.527

Sevoflurane

6.734 ± 0.176

6.831 ± 0.319

6.809 ± 0.403

6.792 ± 0.250

Propofol

6.783 ± 0.321

6.624 ± 0.456

6.862 ± 0.355

6.670 ± 0.487

Alfaxalone

6.761 ± 0.268

6.718 ± 0.249

6.588 ± 0.559

6.689 ± 0.325

Mean ± SD for the three different doses and the arithmetic mean of the three doses for isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol and alfaxalone in basal ganglia (BG), parietal lobe (PL) and occipital lobe (OL). Different alphabetical superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05) between different doses of each anesthetic different numerical superscripts differ significantly between arithmetic mean tCr concentrations of each anesthetic

A lactate signal was not detected at any time. Few changes in cerebral metabolite concentrations relative to brain water content were found among the doses of the four anesthetics. Significant differences were detected for Glx in treatment I in parietal lobe but these changes did not coincide with either time or dose (Table 1). The total NAA (tNAA) concentration relative to water content in basal ganglia increased in a dose- or time-dependent manner in treatment A to reach a significant level between the first and third dose. Significant differences in tNAA were detected in treatment P in basal ganglia but these changes did not coincide with either time or dose (Table 2). Total choline concentration relative to brain water content decreased over time with both volatile anesthetics being significant in all brain regions except for treatment I in the occipital lobe (Table 3). Cerebral concentration of inositol revealed no significant differences (Table 4). Creatine concentration relative to cerebral water decreased with treatment S time-dependently (Table 5).

Metabolite ratios were calculated with creatine as internal reference metabolite. Total NAA to creatine ratio in treatment P in the occipital lobe showed significant differences between doses without relationship to dose or time (Table 2). A reduction in total choline to creatine ratio over time was detected for treatment I in the occipital lobe only (Table 3).

For comparison of the four anesthetics metabolite concentrations and their ratios with creatine as the denominator were arithmetically averaged over the three doses of each anesthetic. In treatment I higher levels of Glx were detected compared to injectable anesthetics in the parietal lobe (Table 1). Total choline was lower with isoflurane compared to treatment A in the basal ganglia and treatment P in the occipital lobe (Table 3) and creatine was lower with isoflurane compared to treatment A in the basal ganglia (Table S5). Metabolite ratios to creatine revealed no significant differences between anesthetics (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).

Plasma concentrations of alfaxalone and propofol showed a wide individual range. Mean plasma concentrations increased with infusion rate with a statistically significant differentiation between the low dose and the middle and high dose, but not between the middle and the high dose for both injectable anesthetics (Fig. 4). Pearson’s correlation asserted no interdependence of plasma concentration of propofol and alfaxalone on metabolite concentration and of sodium levels on total NAA and inositol.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Plasma concentration of propofol and alfaxalone in mg L− 1 for doses 1, 2 and 3. First and third quartiles are defined by the boxes and the median by the band inside. Minimum and maximum is indicated by the whiskers. * Significant difference to dose 2 and 3 (p < 0.05)

In Treatment P, blood pH, HCO3 and sBE decreased. Plasma levels of glucose showed a mild increase in Treatment I but stayed within clinical reference. Plasma lactate increased dose-dependently with both volatile anesthetics and plasma triglycerides increased with administration of propofol (Table 6).
Table 6

pH, HCO3-, sBE plasma glucose, −lactate and –triglycerides

 

Baseline

Measurement 1

Measurement 2

Measurement 3

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

pH

Isoflurane

7.38 ± 0.04A

7.35 ± 0.04

7.37 ± 0.05

7.38 ± 0.02AB

Sevoflurane

7.39 ± 0.02AB

7.35 ± 0.02

7.36 ± 0.02

7.39 ± 0.04A

Propofol

7.41 ± 0.02B

7.33 ± 0.03*

7.33 ± 0.04*

7.30 ± 0.04*B

Alfaxalone

7.39 ± 0.05AB

7.34 ± 0.03

7.35 ± 0.03

7.35 ± 0.03AB

HCO3

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

21.01 ± 1.73A

20.44 ± 1.74AB

20.00 ± 1.37AB

21.00 ± 1.57AB

Sevoflurane

22.22 ± 1.46AB

20.32 ± 1.09*A

20.86 ± 0.99AB

20.66 ± 1.24AB

Propofol

22.01 ± 1.87B

20.10 ± 1.31*A

19.67 ± 1.34*A

18.58 ± 1.11*A

Alfaxalone

21.71 ± 1.59AB

21.73 ± 1.07B

22.00 ± 1.04B

21.94 ± 0.92B

sBE

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

−2.77 ± 1.31A

−4.27 ± 1.95AB

−4.38 ± 1.85AB

−3.30 ± 1.59AB

Sevoflurane

−2.02 ± 1.54AB

−4.30 ± 1.08*AB

−3.70 ± 1.09AB

−3.56 ± 1.16*B

Propofol

− 1.84 ± 1.70B

− 4.86 ± 1.46*A

−5.27 ± 1.55*A

−6.67 ± 1.41*A

Alfaxalone

−2.5 ± 1.33AB

− 3.08 ± 1.06B

−2.78 ± 1.05B

−2.85 ± 0.98B

Na+

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

148.2 ± 1.48

147.7 ± 1A

146.8 ± 1*B

147.25 ± 1.2AB

Sevoflurane

147.9 ± 1.66

148.1 ± 1.8

146.2 ± 2.2*A

146.2 ± 1.6*A

Propofol

147.2 ± 1.48

147.33 ± 1.7A

147.6 ± 1.8A

148.89 ± 1.6*

Alfaxalone

147.67 ± 1.66

149 ± 1.1*

150.7 ± 3.1*

149.8 ± 0.9*

Glucose

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

5.29 ± 0.25

5.84 ± 0.61B

6.13 ± 0.65A

6.00 ± 0.49*ABC

Sevoflurane

5.29 ± 0.37

5.19 ± 0.21AC

5.56 ± 0.40A

5.59 ± 0.42A

Propofol

5.20 ± 0.28

4.98 ± 0.38A

4.97 ± 0.27

4.92 ± 0.30B

Alfaxalone

5.65 ± 0.63

5.83 ± 0.49BC

6.17 ± 0.93A

6.31 ± 0.66C

Lactate

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

1.06 ± 0.40A

2.03 ± 0.94*A

2.10 ± 0.69*A

1.97 ± 0.78

Sevoflurane

1.01 ± 0.30AB

1.61 ± 0.56AB

1.89 ± 0.74*AB

1.58 ± 0.77

Propofol

1.01 ± 0.33B

1.12 ± 0.34B

1.31 ± 0.55AB

1.41 ± 0.23

Alfaxalone

0.95 ± 0.49AB

0.86 ± 0.83B

1.03 ± 0.64B

1.14 ± 0.57

Triglycerides

[mmol L− 1]

Isoflurane

0.53 ± 0.17A

0.36 ± 0.13*AB

0.29 ± 0.13*A

0.36 ± 0.24AB

Sevoflurane

0.53 ± 0.14AB

0.36 ± 0.14A

0.29 ± 0.11*A

0.27 ± 0.09*

Propofol

0.55 ± 0.12B

2.82 ± 1.02*

2.97 ± 1.21*

3.46 ± 1.07*A

Alfaxalone

0.59 ± 0.16AB

0.22 ± 0.06*B

0.19 ± 0.07*A

0.20 ± 0.06*B

Mean ± SD of the results of blood gas analysis (pH, HCO3- [mmol L-1], sBE [mmol L-1]) and plasma glucose [mmol L-1], −lactate [mmol L-1] and -triglycerides [mmol L-1] before anaesthesia, after measurement period 1, 2 and 3; * p < 0.05 compared to baseline within one Treatment, Different alphabetical superscripts differ in between treatments at one measurementpoint (p < 0.05)

Body temperature decreased over time in treatments I, S and A. In treatment P, body temperature started to increase during second measurement to reach baseline values again after the third measurement (Table 7).
Table 7

pulse rate and body temperature

 

pre induction

post induction

measurement 1

measurement 2

measurement 3

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

pulse rate [bpm]

Isoflurane

92.40 ± 18.23

123.90 ± 24.92*A

113.13 ± 8.81AB

125.29 ± 14.15*A

131.45 ± 15.44*AB

Sevoflurane

96.00 ± 15.00

123.90 ± 14.52*A

104.65 ± 13.83AB

116.08 ± 11.94*A

127.37 ± 18.57*A

Propofol

87.20 ± 8.85

98.70 ± 26.96A

90.11 ± 22.37A

100.47 ± 21.31A

103.20 ± 19.75

Alfaxalone

94.00 ± 7.24

163.20 ± 29.47*

115.68 ± 26.35B

155.55 ± 37.31*

149.94 ± 19.40*B

body temperature [°C]

Isoflurane

38.48 ± 0.28

38.18 ± 0.53

37.31 ± 0.57*

37.25 ± 0.67*AB

36.93 ± 0.60*A

Sevoflurane

38.46 ± 0.21

38.07 ± 0.51

37.24 ± 0.32*

37.02 ± 0.38*A

36.83 ± 0.41*A

Propofol

38.39 ± 0.27

38.08 ± 0.53

37.71 ± 0.45*

37.84 ± 0.46*B

38.20 ± 0.37

Alfaxalone

38.52 ± 0.30

38.26 ± 0.36

37.38 ± 0.54*

37.22 ± 0.63*AB

37.03 ± 0.66*A

Mean ± SD pulse rate [bpm] and body temperature [°C] pre and post induction and averaged over measurement period 1, 2 and 3. * p < 0.05 significant to baseline (pre induction) within one treatment and different alphabetical superscripts differ significantly between treatments at the same timepoint (p < 0.05)

Recovery from Anaesthesia

All dogs in Treatment I and S were extubated within 2–5 min after discontinuing anesthesia and recovery was uneventful. The first dog in treatment A and the first dog in treatment P developed myoclonia and reverse sneezing. Therefore, isoflurane was given for 30 min after discontinuing the constant rate infusion of alfaxalone or propofol to avoid myclonia. After discontinuation of isoflurane the recovery period was uneventful with time to extubation from 23 to 68 min.

Discussion

Using 1H MRS at 3 T we found no evidence of increased intracerebral concentration of lactate with isoflurane, sevoflurane, propofol or alfaxalone in the canine brain. There were only minor differences between doses and anesthetics related to tNAA, Choline, Creatine, Inositol and Glx.

Cerebral lactate, formerly seen only as a waste product of anaerobe glycolysis is nowadays considered a beneficial metabolite serving as an energy substrate amongst others during hypoglycemia [10, 30]. Cerebral levels of lactate were increased upon exposure to volatile anesthetics in rodents in a reversible manner [11, 21, 22]. This effect was independent of blood lactate concentration. By performing a linear regression analysis of brain lactate measured by 1H MRS and blood lactate concentration no relationship was determined in rats [22]. Isoflurane was also shown to enhance neuroprotective effects of exogenously administered lactate in an experimental stroke model [10]. As isoflurane led to a 6-fold increase in cerebral lactate in mice, we expected to be able to detect a sufficient lactate resonance in canine brain at 3 T. However, at this field strength we were not able to quantify cerebral lactate. In comparison to our results the previously reported rodent studies [21, 22] were able to reliably detect lactate levels with a field strength of 9.4 T. Jacob et al. [24] published 2-fold higher cerebral lactate values in children with sevoflurane compared to propofol detected at 3 T. However, these data included metabolite concentrations with associated CRLB values of “80% or fewer in 80% of the scans” and thus are not reliable. Uncertainties in metabolite concentrations in LcModel are expressed in CRLBs and in general only values of 20% or less are of acceptable reliability [31]. Lactate resonances in 1H MRS are only detectable during neuronal stimulation [32] and in pathologic conditions such as neoplastic or inflammatory lesions [12, 14] also in canine brain [27]. Under these circumstances lactate can reliably be detected also at 3 T. In various species and with different measuring techniques it has been shown that halogenated volatile anesthetics increase cerebral levels of lactate [11, 2123]. As we did not detect lactate under influence of isoflurane and sevoflurane administered at a dose of 2 MAC we can conclude that halogenated volatile anesthetics do not have an effect on cerebral levels of lactate in dogs. However, technical difficulties such as coupling effects of the lactate doublet [33] and overlapping resonances of lactate and lipids resonating at the same region of the spectrum at this field strength cannot be excluded.

Increased serum lactate with volatile anesthetics can be explained by increased lactate production or decreased hepatic lactate clearance. Volatile anesthetics dose dependently decrease blood pressure by venodilation and reduced myocardial contractility. This could potentially lead to reduced peripheral perfusion with an increase in lactate production and a reduction in hepatic blood flow, thereby, decreasing hepatic clearance. In contrast, desflurane and propofol were shown to even increase peripheral perfusion index in a clinical study in humans by means of a new generation pulse oximeter [34]. Measurement of cardiac output was not performed. In dogs, 1.85 MAC isoflurane tended to increase hepatic blood flow [35]. Various studies have shown effects of volatile anesthetics on mitochondria [3639]. Interference of volatile anesthetics with mitochondrial oxidation of NADH to NAD and thus reduced oxidative phosphorylation resulting in a shift to lactate production was shown for rat liver and monkey kidney cells [40, 41]. Therefore, the observed increased serum lactate levels are more likely related to direct mitochondrial effects than malperfusion.

Differences in metabolite concentrations between different brain regions presented in this paper show a similar pattern as previously published for canine brain [15, 17] and were independent of the anesthetic used. In humans, comparison of brain metabolite concentrations measured with different scanners and techniques showed good agreement but absolute values differed [42]. Data from other institutions can only be used as reference but direct comparison of data acquired on scanners from other institutions is not recommended.

In basal ganglia tNAA was the only metabolite showing dose-dependent increase of 8% in dogs receiving alfaxalone, being significantly different (p = 0.0036) between the first and third dose. However, this increase might also be time associated as the dose in treatment P and A increased over time. In the parietal lobe a similar increase was detected but statistical significance was not reached. In the occipital lobe, no changes were noted. The detected increase in cerebral levels of tNAA is unexpected. In pathologic conditions associated with neuronal loss and dysfunction such as demyelinating and neurodegenerative disorders [43] tNAA is decreased. As we did not detect a decrease in tNAA there seems to be no neuronal degeneration or loss occurring during anesthesia. Increases in tNAA are rare and only described for canvan’s disease in humans. Canvan’s disease is an autosomal recessive leukodystrophy with absence of aspartoacylase resulting in lack of NAA-degradation [12] with increases in tNAA of about 50% or more [44, 45]. To the author’s knowledge, this condition has not been reported in dogs and does not explain the detected changes during anesthesia.

Increase in choline-containing-compounds with isoflurane was described for mice [21]. An increase in cerebral acetylcholine is described for general anesthesia in mice [46, 47]. As changes in cerebral acetylcholine have only little effect on total choline concentration, adrenergic pathways were suggested as the α2-agonist medetomidine revoked isoflurane induced increases in choline containing compounds in mice [21]. We detected a time-dependent reduction in total choline with volatile anesthetics (Table 3). Predominantly lower levels of total choline were also detected with volatile anesthetics when comparing the arithmetic mean of total choline concentration of the three doses of each anesthetic (Table 3). Lower levels of glycerophosphocholine and phosphocholine with isoflurane compared to propofol were also depicted in rats [22]. Another study in piglets also reported decreases in Cho [48] and hypothesized oxidative stress due to anesthesia affecting osmoregulation in astrocytes [49]. Isoflurane was shown to cause oxidative stress in human neuroglioma cells [50] whereas propofol had antioxidant properties in cultured astrocytes [51] explaining the different effects on choline levels.

Higher levels of Glx were present in in the parietal lobe with isoflurane compared to propofol and alfaxlaone and with both volatile anesthetics Glx was higher than with the injectable anesthetics in other investigated brain regions. Elevated cerebral concentrations of glutamate and glutamine might be mediated by effects of volatile anesthetics on cerebral glutamate transporters and thus interference in glutamate turnover [52, 53]. The changes described here for Glx are, however, not distinctive enough to allow a conclusive statement.

Total NAA and myo-Inositol have been described as cerebral osmolytes [54, 55]. Changes in plasma osmolarity and thus the administered cardiovascular support may have impact on these metabolites. Plasma osmolarity is largely dependant on plasma levels of sodium. Plasma levels of sodium stayed within reference limits but few differences were detected compared to baseline. Pearson’s correlation asserted no interdependence of sodium with total NAA and inositol. Also, lack of significant changes in cerebral concentration of these metabolites consistent in all treatments with increasing amount of fluids administered implies, that the chosen cardiovascular support did not affect these metabolites at measured times.

Changes in body temperature were similar for isoflurane, sevoflurane and alfaxalone showing a decrease over time due their effects on hypothalamic thermoregulation and decreased muscle tone and metabolic rate [56]. In dogs receiving propofol body temperature started to rise again after an initial decline with the high infusion rate. A link to propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) [57], a contemporary issue in human medicine can be ruled out because rhabdomyolysis, bradycardia, hyperkalemia and other clinical signs of PRIS were not seen in these dogs and overall duration of propofol infusion was short. As the temperature response to high doses of propofol was the same in all dogs, a specific mechanism can be suspected but to the authors’ knowledge has not been described before. In conjunction with the decrease in HCO3, sBE, pH and glucose, increased muscle activity induced by high dose propofol is a possible explanation but clinically no increase in muscle tone or muscle twitching was observed during the experiment. The high doses were chosen consciously to better reveal effects on brain metabolites. As these doses exceed clinically administered infusion rates by far, this effect on body temperature is not seen in clinical cases.

Turbidity of hyperlipemic plasma in propofol plasma samples might interfere with photometric measurements of lactate, glucose and triglycerides and might falsify results. However, the lipaemic index as an extinction based reference value did not exceed the critical lipaemic index values specified for the tests used.

Except for high dose of isoflurane and middle and high dose of alfaxalone serum glucose stayed within reference limits but showed slight changes in all anesthetics. Increase in serum glucose during anesthesia is well documented as a result of reduced insulin secretion during anesthesia with different volatile agents in dogs, swine and humans [5862]. Propofol was shown to slightly increase insulin secretion in rhesus monkeys [63] leading to lower glucose levels. Alfaxalone was shown to have no effect on glucose and insulin concentration up to 15 min after bolus induction in acepromazine and hydromorphone premedicated dogs [64]. When administered in supraclinical doses over a long period, our data suggest a similar effect on glucose as with volatile anesthetics but insulin concentration was not determined.

Several limitations of this study can be specified concerning magnetic resonance protocol, post processing procedure and anesthetic management. Compared to human brain, complete differentiation of grey and white matter for proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was not possible so that the fraction from grey and white matter in the voxel of interest in the same brain region differ in between measurements. Absolute metabolite concentrations were not determined as correction for T1 and T2 effects involves excessively prolonged image acquisition times.

Individual MAC and MIR were not determined. Main focus of this study was to evaluate dose dependent effects of the four investigated anesthetics on the brain. The MAC and MIR are primarily measures for anesthetic potency related to immobility in response to a maximal noxious stimulus [65, 66]. In contrast to unconsciousness, immobility is mainly mediated via spinal cord effects [67, 68], therefore individual MAC and MIR values were not considered to be necessary for comparing anesthetic effects on the brain.

The injectable anesthetics were administered at incrementally increasing dose rate to try and avoid a possible period effect due to accumulation of drug, particularly at supra-clinical dose rates. Plasma concentrations, on average, for both alfaxalone and propofol increased with increasing infusion rates but individual patient variability was observed, leading to some overlap between plasma concentrations at middle and high infusion rates.

To the authors knowledge this study was the first study evaluating effects of commonly used anesthetics on cerebral metabolism in different regions of the canine brain.

Conclusion

Neither with isoflurane nor with sevoflurane elevated levels of cerebral lactate could be detected. For tNAA, choline, creatine, inositol and Glx only minor differences between treatments were seen. These differences seem to be without clinical relevance. The effect of other peri-anesthetically administered drugs like sedatives and analgesics on canine cerebral metabolites still need to be determined in further studies.

Abbreviations

1H MRS: 

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

ASA: 

American Society of Anesthesiologists

Cho: 

Choline

CMRglu: 

Cerebral metabolic rate of glucose

CRLB: 

Cramer-Rao lower bounds

GABA: 

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

GC/MS: 

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

Glx: 

Sum of glutamate and glutamine

HES: 

Hydroxyethyl starch

LC/MS: 

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry

MAC: 

Minimal alveolar concentration

MIR: 

Minimum infusion rate

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRS: 

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

NAA: 

N-acetylaspartate

NADH/NAD: 

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

PRESS: 

Point resolved spectroscopy sequence

PRIS: 

Propofol infusion syndrome

SD: 

Standard deviation

TIVA: 

Total intravenous anesthesia

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Martin Beyerbach of the Department of biometry, epidemiology and information processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation for assistance with the statistical analyses.

Funding

Self-funded (University funds).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets recorded and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SBRK conceived the project. IC and PRK made technical contributions to the 1H MRS protocol. FJS accomplished data sampling and analyzing, supported by IC and SBRK. KP and MGR determined alfaxalone plasma concentrations. SBRK, FJS and IC participated in interpretation of the study results. FJS drafted the paper and was supported by IC. The manuscript was revised by SBRK, PRK, KP and MGR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the ethical committee for animal experimentation of the Federal State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety of Lower Saxony, Germany (3392 42,502–04-13/1252) according to the German animal protection law.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MGR and KP are employed by Jurox Pty Ltd.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Small Animal Clinic (Söbbeler, Kästner), University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover Foundation, Hannover, Germany
(2)
Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging (Carrera, Kircher), Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(3)
Jurox Pty Ltd. (Pasloske, Ranasinghe), Rutherford, Australia

References

  1. Fowler JS, Ido T. Initial and subsequent approach for the synthesis of 18FDG. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32(1):6–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Barker SJ, Shah NK, Wu JC, Kao YJ. Cerebral metabolism during propofol anesthesia in humans studied with positron emission tomography. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(2):393–403. discussion 327AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Shah NK, Anderson CT. Positron emission tomography study of regional cerebral metabolism in humans during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(3):549–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schlunzen L, Juul N, Hansen KV, Gjedde A, Cold GE. Regional cerebral glucose metabolism during sevoflurane anaesthesia in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(5):603–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sun X, Zhang H, Gao C, Zhang G, Xu L, Lv M, Chai W. Imaging the effects of propofol on human cerebral glucose metabolism using positron emission tomography. J Int Med Res. 2008;36(6):1305–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeong YB, Kim JS, Jeong SM, Park JW, Choi IC. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia on regional cerebral glucose metabolism in humans using positron emission tomography. J IntMed Res. 2006;34(4):374–84.Google Scholar
  7. Kaisti KK, Langsjo JW, Aalto S, Oikonen V, Sipila H, Teras M, Hinkka S, Metsahonkala L, Scheinin H. Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):603–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sari A, Maekawa T, Tohjo M, Okuda Y, Takeshita H. Effects of Althesin on cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Br J Anaesth. 1976;48(6):545–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oshima T, Karasawa F, Okazaki Y, Wada H, Satoh T. Effects of sevoflurane on cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in human beings: a comparison with isoflurane. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20(7):543–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Horn T, Klein J. Neuroprotective effects of lactate in brain ischemia: dependence on anesthetic drugs. Neurochem Int. 2013;62(3):251–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Horn T, Klein J. Lactate levels in the brain are elevated upon exposure to volatile anesthetics: a microdialysis study. Neurochem Int. 2010;57(8):940–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barker PB, Bizzi A, Stefano ND, Gullapalli R, DDM L. Introduction to MR spectroscopy in vivo. In: Clinical MR spectroscopy: techniques and applications. edn. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. RAd G. In vivo NMR spectroscopy - static aspects. In: In vivo NMR spectroscopy: principles and techniques. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007. p. 43–110.Google Scholar
  14. Soares DP, Law M. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain: review of metabolites and clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(1):12–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrera I, Richter H, Meier D, Kircher PR, Dennler M. Regional metabolite concentrations in the brain of healthy dogs measured by use of short echo time, single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3.0 tesla. Am J Vet Res. 2015;76(2):129–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Warrington CD, Feeney DA, Ober CP, Jessen CR, Steward SM, Armien AG, Fletcher TF. Relative metabolite concentrations and ratios determined by use of 3-T region-specific proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain of healthy beagles. Am J Vet Res. 2013;74(10):1291–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ono K, Kitagawa M, Ito D, Tanaka N, Watari T. Regional variations and age-related changes detected with magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the brain of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2014;75(2):179–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baker EH, Basso G, Barker PB, Smith MA, Bonekamp D, Horska A. Regional apparent metabolite concentrations in young adult brain measured by (1)H MR spectroscopy at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(3):489–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Pradhan S, Bonekamp S, Gillen JS, Rowland LM, Wijtenburg SA, Edden RA, Barker PB. Comparison of single voxel brain MRS AT 3T and 7T using 32-channel head coils. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(8):1013–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Tkac I, Oz G, Adriany G, Ugurbil K, Gruetter R. In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at high magnetic fields: metabolite quantification at 4T vs. 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(4):868–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Boretius S, Tammer R, Michaelis T, Brockmoller J, Frahm J. Halogenated volatile anesthetics alter brain metabolism as revealed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of mice in vivo. NeuroImage. 2013;69:244–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Makaryus R, Lee H, Yu M, Zhang S, Smith SD, Rebecchi M, Glass PS, Benveniste H. The metabolomic profile during isoflurane anesthesia differs from propofol anesthesia in the live rodent brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31(6):1432–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Valette J, Guillermier M, Besret L, Hantraye P, Bloch G, Lebon V. Isoflurane strongly affects the diffusion of intracellular metabolites, as shown by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the monkey brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(3):588–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacob Z, Li H, Makaryus R, Zhang S, Reinsel R, Lee H, Feng T, Rothman DL, Benveniste H. Metabolomic profiling of children's brains undergoing general anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(5):1062–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee SH, Kim SY, Woo DC, Choe BY, Ryu KN, Choi WS, Jahng GH, Yim SV, Kim HY, Choi CB. Differential neurochemical responses of the canine striatum with pentobarbital or ketamine anesthesia: a 3T proton MRS study. J Vet Med Sci. 2010;72(5):583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carrera I, Kircher PR, Meier D, Richter H, Beckman K, Dennler M. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the evaluation of hepatic encephalopathy in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2014;75(9):818–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stadler KL, Ober CP, Feeney DA, Jessen CR. Multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of inflammatory and neoplastic lesions of the canine brain at 3.0 T. Am J Vet Res. 2014;75(11):982–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazama T, Ikeda K. Comparison of MAC and the rate of rise of alveolar concentration of sevoflurane with halothane and isoflurane in the dog. Anesthesiology. 1988;68(3):435–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferre PJ, Pasloske K, Whittem T, Ranasinghe MG, Li Q, Lefebvre HP. Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone in dogs after an intravenous bolus of Alfaxan-CD RTU. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006;33(4):229–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gladden LB. Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 1):5–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Provencher S. LCModel & LCMgui User’s Manual; LCModel Version 6.3–1. In: http://www.s-provencher.com/pub/LCModel/manual/manual.pdf Stephen Provencher Incorporated; April 28, 2013.
  32. Prichard J, Rothman D, Novotny E, Petroff O, Kuwabara T, Avison M, Howseman A, Hanstock C, Shulman R. Lactate rise detected by 1H NMR in human visual cortex during physiologic stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(13):5829–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Sotak CH, Alger JR. A pitfall associated with lactate detection using stimulated-echo proton spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17(2):533–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kowalczyk M, Fijalkowska A, Nestorowicz A. New generation pulse oximetry in the assessment of peripheral perfusion during general anaesthesia - a comparison between propofol and desflurane. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013;45(3):138–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hartman JC, Pagel PS, Proctor LT, Kampine JP, Schmeling WT, Warltier DC. Influence of desflurane, isoflurane and halothane on regional tissue perfusion in dogs. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39(8):877–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall GM, Kirtland SJ, Baum H. The inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by inhalational anaesthetic agents. Br J Anaesth. 1973;45(10):1005–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Brunner EA, Cheng SC, Berman ML. Effects of anesthesia on intermediary metabolism. Annu Rev Med. 1975;26:391–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee SL, Alto LE, Dhalla NS. Subcellular effects of some anesthetic agents on rat myocardium. Can J Physio Pharmacol. 1979;57(1):65–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanley PJ, Ray J, Brandt U, Daut J. Halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane inhibit NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) of cardiac mitochondria. J Physiol. 2002;544(Pt 3):687–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Brabec MJ, Bedows E, Davidson BA, Knight PR. Effect of general anesthetics and pressure on aerobic metabolism of monkey kidney cells. Anesthesiology. 1984;61(1):43–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nahrwold ML, Lecky JH, Cohen PJ. The effect of halothane on mitochondrial permeability to NADH. Life Sci. 1974;15(7):1261–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Haga KK, Khor YP, Farrall A, Wardlaw JM. A systematic review of brain metabolite changes, measured with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, in healthy aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(3):353–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. van der Knaap MS, Jvd G, Luyten PR, JAD H, JJP N, Valk J. 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain in degenerative cerebral disorders. Ann Neurol. 1992;31(2):202–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wittsack HJ, Kugel H, Roth B, Heindel W. Quantitative measurements with localized 1H MR spectroscopy in children with Canavan’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6(6):889–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Marks HG, Caro PA, Wang ZY, Detre JA, Bogdan AR, Gusnard DA, Zimmerman RA. Use of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and localized 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Canavan’s disease: a case report. Ann Neurol. 1991;30(1):106–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Elliott KA, Swank RL, Henderson N. Effects of anesthetics and convulsants on acetylcholine content of brain. Am J Phys. 1950;162(2):469–74.Google Scholar
  47. Modak AT, Weintraub ST, McCoy TH, Stavinoha WB. Use of 300-msec microwave irradiation for enzyme inactivation: a study of effects of sodium pentobarbital on acetylcholine concentration in mouse brain regions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976;197(2):245–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ringer SK, Ohlerth S, Carrera I, Mauch J, Spielmann N, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Weiss M. Effects of hypotension and/or hypocapnia during sevoflurane anesthesia on perfusion and metabolites in the developing brain of piglets-a blinded randomized study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(9):909–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Brand A, Leibfritz D, Richter-Landsberg C. Oxidative stress-induced metabolic alterations in rat brain astrocytes studied by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. J Neurosci Res. 1999;58(4):576–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ni C, Li C, Dong Y, Guo X, Zhang Y, Xie Z. Anesthetic Isoflurane Induces DNA Damage Through Oxidative Stress and p53 Pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 2016:54(5):3591–605.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Acquaviva R, Campisi A, Murabito P, Raciti G, Avola R, Mangiameli S, Musumeci I, Barcellona ML, Vanella A, Li Volti G. Propofol attenuates peroxynitrite-mediated DNA damage and apoptosis in cultured astrocytes: an alternative protective mechanism. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(6):1363–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Do SH, Kamatchi GL, Washington JM, Zuo Z. Effects of volatile anesthetics on glutamate transporter, excitatory amino acid transporter type 3: the role of protein kinase C. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(6):1492–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zuo Z. Isoflurane enhances glutamate uptake via glutamate transporters in rat glial cells. Neuroreport. 2001;12(5):1077–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Mcintosh JC, Cooper JR. Studies on the function of N-acetyl aspartic acid in brain. J Neurochem. 1965;12(9):825–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Strange K, Emma F, Paredes A, Morrison R. Osmoregulatory changes in myo-inositol content and Na+/myo-inositol cotransport in rat cortical astrocytes. Glia. 1994;12(1):34–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Haskins SC. Monitoring anesthetized patients. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA, editors. Lumb and Jones’ veterinary Anaesthesia. 4th ed. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007. p. 533–58.Google Scholar
  57. Kam PC, Cardone D. Propofol infusion syndrome. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(7):690–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Camu F. Carbohydrate intolerance during halothane anesthesia in dogs. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1973;24(3):177–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Camu F. Impaired early insulin response to glycemic stimulus during enflurane anesthesia in dogs. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1976;27(suppl):267–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Diltoer M, Camu F. Glucose homeostasis and insulin secretion during isoflurane anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology. 1988;68(6):880–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Saho S, Kadota Y, Sameshima T, Miyao J, Tsurumaru T, Yoshimura N. The effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in pigs. Anesth Analg. 1997;84(6):1359–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Tanaka T, Nabatame H, Tanifuji Y. Insulin secretion and glucose utilization are impaired under general anesthesia with sevoflurane as well as isoflurane in a concentration-independent manner. J Anesth. 2005;19(4):277–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kim JM, Shin JS, Yoon IH, Min BH, Jeong WY, Lee GE, Kim MS, Kim JE, Jang JY, Park CG. The effect of propofol on intravenous glucose tolerance test in rhesus monkey. J Med Primatol. 2014;43(4):242–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Muñoz KA, Robertson SA, Wilson DV. The effects of ketamine or midazolam on the intubation dose of alfaxalone, hemodynamic function, glucose and insulin concentrations in healthy dogs. [abstract]. Prague: AVA Autumn Meeting; 2016.Google Scholar
  65. Eger EI 2nd, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology. 1965;26(6):756–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith C, McEwan AI, Jhaveri R, Wilkinson M, Goodman D, Smith LR, Canada AT, Glass PS. The interaction of fentanyl on the Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(4):820–8. discussion 826AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Antognini JF, Schwartz K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology. 1993;79(6):1244–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rampil IJ, Mason P, Singh H. Anesthetic potency (MAC) is independent of forebrain structures in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(4):707–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement