Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Epidemiology and clinico-pathological characteristics of current goat pox outbreak in North Vietnam

BMC Veterinary Research volume 16, Article number: 128 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In view of the current swine fever outbreak and the government aspiration to increase the goat population, a need arises to control and prevent outbreaks of goat pox. Despite North Vietnam facing sporadic cases of goat pox, this most recent outbreak had the highest recorded morbidity, mortality and case fatality rate. Thus, owing to the likelihood of a widespread recurrence of goat pox infection, an analysis of that outbreak was done based on selected signalment, management and disease pattern (signs and pathology) parameters. This includes examination of animals, inspection of facilities, tissue sampling and analysis for confirmation of goatpox along with questionaires.

Results

It was found that the susceptible age group were between 3 and 6 months old kids while higher infection rate occurred in those under the free-range rearing system. The clinical signs of pyrexia, anorexia, nasal discharge and lesions of pocks were not restricted to the skin but have extended into the lung and intestine. The pathogen had been confirmed in positive cases via PCR as goat pox with prevalence of 79.69%.

Conclusions

The epidemiology of the current goat pox outbreak in North Vietnam denotes a significant prevalence which may affect the industry. This signals the importance of identifying the salient clinical signs and post mortem lesions of goat pox at the field level in order to achieve an effective control of the disease.

Background

The re-emerging of Capripoxvirus and it’s clinical syndrome has been well documented worldwide especially in Asia and Africa [1, 2]. Undoubtedly, this virus bears pronounced economic impact not only to endemic regions especially to the livelihoods of small-scale farmers and poor rural communities [3] but also posed major constraint in international livestock trade. A greater concern is the risk of its expansion to many countries including Vietnam in 2005 [4] which is in the midst of developing a competitive goat industry. The first reported goat pox outbreak of North Vietnam in 2005 that affected four provinces i.e. Coa Bang, Bac Giang, Lang Son and Ha Tay has led to the death of 789 goats. The agents confirmed via ELISA and PCR yielded that the isolate was host specific being severe in goats [4]. Following this incidence, the outbreak has been resolved leading to an annual increase of 38% in Vietnam goat population from 1.8 million heads in 2015 to 2.6 million heads in 2017 [5]. Owing to the Vietnamese government aspiration to produce 3.9 million heads of goats in 2020, a much more comprehensive study on devastating disease like the epidemio-economical impact of goat pox is warranted. Nevertheless, despite the increase in goat population in addition to animal movement along the borders, market demands, high stocking densities and proximity of facility, goat pox outbreak has recurred commencing from 2014 in Ninh Binh province. This recurrence has raised concern on the possible devastating impact of goat pox on Vietnam’s goat industry which forms the basis of this study. A thorough analysis of current recurrence along with a complete set of epidemiological data will confer an effective control and prevention of new outbreaks.

Results

Observation of the farms

Vaccination against goat pox was not practised in either type of farming systems. The main goat rearing methods in North Vietnam under the extensive system includes backyard farming where the goats are allowed to freely graze in lowland and mountainous areas. Under such system there is minimal provision of commercial feed. On the otherhand, under intensive farming, the goats are kept in stalls and supplemented with concentrates.

Morbidity rate

The morbidity and mortality rates due to goat pox is shown in Table 1. During this study, the first case of sick goats was reported in Ninh Binh province which then radiated to other parts of North Vietnam. Thus, the study commenced in Ninh Binh and radiated out to its five other surrounding provinces. The morbidity rate ranged between 11.8–17.5% without significant differences between all provinces except for Yen Bai which has the lowest rate (p < 0.000). However, this lowest rate at Yen Bai was not significantly different to that seen in Hoa Binh.

Table 1 Morbidity rate of goatpox outbreak in North Vietnam
Full size table

Mortality and case fatality rate of goat pox outbreak

Table 2 shows the case fatality rate of goats due to the infection during the study period. The mortality and case fatality rate ranges between 5.1–7.4% and 35.3–63%, respectively without any significant differences between provinces.

Table 2 Mortality and case fatality rate of goat pox disease in North Vietnam
Full size table

Infection rate between farming system

It was found that goats under the extensive system has a 8.7% higher (p < 0.05) infection rate than those managed intensively (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of goat pox incidence based on rearing method
Full size table

Age susceptibility

In order to examine the influence of age to infection rate, the goats were into categorized into three groups, viz.; less than 3; 3–6 months and more than 6 months old. The analysis of age susceptibility to infection is shown in Table 4. It was found that at almost all instances, those between the ages of 3–6 months were most susceptible (p < 0.001) except at Ninh Bin province. The other age groups of less than 3 and more than 6 months have comparable infection rate.

Table 4 The infection rate based on age groups
Full size table

Clinical and pathology findings

Goats showed varying degrees of clinical signs severity, however, almost 85% of infected goats showed loss of appetite, anorexia to completely refusal of feed leading to emaciation (Table 5). Fatigue and pyrexia were also among common manifestations observed in most cases. Additionally, blepharitis, rhinitis (Fig. 1) and difficulty to move ensued in some cases.

Table 5 Distribution of clinical signs of goat pox based on their occurrence (n = 1814)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

Photograph showing ulcers in nasal cavity and rhinitis

Full size image

Hardened swelling which developed into sores were found on the skin (mainly hairless regions) over any part of the body including the mouth, pinna (Fig. 2) and udder (Figs. 3 and 4). The size of the pock lesions varies between 0.5–1 cm in diameter.

Fig. 2
figure2

Photograph exhibiting papules found on mouth, nares and ear

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Photograph showing a papule that has ulcerated on the ear pinna

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Photograph of infected goat’s udder denoting ulcers and inflammation

Full size image

The finding of lesions ante- and post mortem is presented in Table 6. In live animals, majority of lesions are confined to the eyes, nares and skin while that of post mortem revealed the lungs (Fig. 5) as a primary site. Calcified greyish papules were found in the intestines (Fig. 6), urinary bladder and uterus. However, other less frequently sites and tissues were also affected as shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Lesion distribution in selected organs and their frequency of appearance (n = 128)
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure5

Photograph of a well-circumscribed greyish pock lesion in the lung of an infected goat

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

Photograph of calcified papules on the intestinal mucosa of an affected goat

Full size image

Histopathological lesions comprising of cellular degeneration and necrosis along with inflammation and haemorrhage were mostly found in skin (Fig. 7), lung and liver. Despite exhaustive histopathology search, no evidence of eosinophilic inclusions were seen in any tissues.

Fig. 7
figure7

Damaged epithelial layers of skin of an infected goat (H&E, X10)

Full size image

PCR

The PCR primer specific test was performed on 128 scab biopsy samples. A total of 79.6% (102/128) of the samples were positive to capripox virus within the expected size band of 172 bp (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure8

PCRA gene based PCR result for detection of capripox virus. Lane M: 100 bp ladder

Full size image

Discussion

Reported outbreaks of goat pox worldwide yields differing mortality rates with 7% in Sudan [2], 21% in Iraq [6] and 30% in India [7]. In this study, a much lower mortality rate was found despite a rather high morbidity rate high probably as a result of the study population containing comparatively fewer of the 3–6 months old goats. It has been shown that maternal antibody for goat pox is maintained for about 3 months and those animals older than 6 months that survived an infection will have life-long immunity [8, 9]. This phenomenon explains the susceptibility of those in the 3–6 months old [9] which should yield higher morbidity rate. However, since the number of animals under this group is quite low, the mortality rate has failed to surpass those of other groups.

The number of dead animals during the outbreak depends on the virus virulence, size of the population and their susceptibility and on the basic reproductive number i.e., average expected number of secondary cases produced by a single infection in a completely susceptible population [10]. However, these rates may vary depending on additional factors including breed [11] and the most notably the herd immune status [12]. Recently published data showed that case fatality rate of goatpox disease ranged from 21.4 to 60% [13,14,15]. Likewise, the high fatality rate in the present study underlined the need for a much more effective control of goat pox along with the requirement to vaccinate susceptible herd or in endemic areas. However, the difficulty in implementing such health programs in Vietnam is explained below.

A 23% morbidity rate based on seroprevalence has been documented in nomadic goat herds in Punjab [16]. It is not suprising to see a higher infection rate in the extensive system as previously reported [11]. However, this rearing method is popular with poor farmers in lowland and mountainous areas in Vietnam who could not afford to spend on a standard health management. Goats under the extensive system forage freely in a wide area exposing them increase chances to be exposed to the virus. These goats might have also been exposed to lesser domestication, maintaining many of the behavioural traits of the wild types such as aggressiveness [17, 18]. Furthermore, goats especially under the extensive system being naturally aggressive [17] predisposes the body to injuries making easier access of the virus when inoculated. This is an added problem since most of the goats were not dehorned (due to financial constraints) making injuries prone to infection during a fight. On the contrary, the low infection rate under the intensive system could have resulted from a much more efficient disease control program that has minimized spread of the virus within the herd. However, the benefits of extensive farming system can be still exploited by taking advantage of its eco-agrarian nature. It can economically ultilise marginal or unused land that can be later be easily adapted by the goats. Such conditions had less stressful effect on the goats making them much more hardy to harsh conditions. This is an opportunity for the poor rural farmers with limited financial resources and knowledge in commercial goat farming. This can be improved if there is provision of extension veterinary officers to offer guide and assistance in goat farming.

Undoubtedly, defining the vulnerable period of infection is one of the most important measurement to be known for an effective disease management [19]. In the study presented here, the most susceptible age were goats of 3–6 months old which conforms to findings of [16, 20] who found that the chance of infection chance in the young was 2.2 times greater than that of an adult. However, contradictory results were seen if infection rate was based on seroprevalence. Fentie et al. [20] demonstrated a low infection rate in older animals although this appeared to refute earlier published findings [21]. Nevertheless, in the latter study [21], age groups were not clearly defined which may have led to a less homogenous groupings. Additionally, the collected samples from slaughter house, tanneries and hide markets where probable that few samples were collected from goat kids to be devoid [21]. The age grouping the study presented here was based on the main purpose of meat goat breeding in Vietnam. The indigenous and mixed breed of Vietnamese goat attained a market weight of 25 to 30 kg at 6 months old age, justifying a 3 month interval being chosen.

Recognising the key salient clinical signs is key factor for field diagnosis of goat pox [11]. The prominent clinical signs seen in this study too were depression and being much more severe in kids [22, 23] accounting for systemic signs of pyrexia. About 85.01% of affected animals showed varying degrees of anorexia associated with the development of lesions on mucus membrane of the face. The lesion commences as red patches around the mouth, nose and eyes which later swelling into a papule. These papules trigger lacrimal, nasal and saliva discharges. Respiratory distress and secondary bacterial pneumonia are predominant in kids which could not survival malignant stage [6, 24, 25]. In adult goats, the ulceration of papules renders difficulty for digestive and breathing activities which in turn worsen productive performance. The goats with conjunctivitis, corneal opacity and blepharitis emulated the acute phase pox disease [4]. The development of pox lesions is observed over the animal body especially hairless areas (face, pinna of the ears, udder, genital, anus, under the tail). The red patches turn to hard rubbery papules and become vesicles after 3 to 4 days. Necrotic papules formed pustular as the result of thrombosis and localised ischaemia. Dark hard scabs are formed by the remnant of necrotic papules [6, 25,26,27].

Although the overt clinical signs of goat pox are quite characteristic, the less severe manifestation needs to be judiciously distinguished from several other closely resembling diseases. The closest would be contagious ecthyma (orf) which affects young kids while goat pox involves all ages. The signs are usually that of flat or dome-shaped bullae crust around the commissures of mouth which left no scar after healing [28] as opposed to a rather permanent papular lesion in goat pox. Blue-tongue may be confused with goats pox although the goats are less less susceptible with signs rarely seen in goat pox i.e. localized oedema, haemorrhages and erosion of mucous membrane. The post mortem lesions of blue tongue are that of effusion in the thoracic cavity and pericardial sac [29]. High mortality is seen in peste des petits ruminants (PPR) which affects mainly young goats that showed signs of coughing; halitosis, erosive oral lesion and severe diarrhoea. These signs are not seen in goat pox along with rather pathognomonic lesion of PPR comprising of zebra stripes of gastro-intestinal tract and pneumonia [30]. Lastly, a likely differential to be considered to goat pox is dermatophilosis [31] where the latter exhibited signs of paintbrush matted hair all over the body that is not a feature of goat pox.

In this study, for all PCR positive cases, the clinical and post mortem lesions were 100% present in the skin and lungs of affected goats. It is likely that owing to the epitheliotropic nature of the virus lesions were predominantly seen in the skin, lung and discrete sites within mucosal surfaces of oro-nasal and gastrointestinal tissues [4]. As evidenced in this study and as reported earlier in similar studies, the role of skin and lung as a target organ [32] for the virus leads to much more deposition of the lesion in these tissues [33, 34]. Beside darkened circumscribed pox lesions [33, 35], the entire lung are pale pink with loss of sponginess. Congested trachea contain blood or fluid-filled vesicles with involvement of the lymph nodes. As seen in the study presented here, calcified nodules are found the most abudant in large intestine (rectum) of goats that were mildly affected [21, 36].

Histopathological findings in the study presented here were in accord to previous publications registering marked change in the epidermis. The degeneration of epithelial cells, hyperkeratosis, ballooning and degeneration of proliferating epithelial cells along with inflammation led to the desquamation of skin layers. Variable observation of lung microscopy include haemorrhage, congestion and thickening alveoli wall which resulted in narrowed alveoli. Secondary bacterial infection has invoked infiltration of inflammatory cells to affected regions of the lung [6, 37, 38].

The PCR-based test is chosen because of its sensitivity and simplicity [39]. The sensitive and simple PCR assay has confirmed caprine pox virus in the biopsy samples [40]. Almost 80% of the samples were positive with amplicon size of 172 bp although no attempt was made to identify and differentiate of caprine pox virus [1, 22, 41, 42]. However, the isolates from this study did not show much variation compared to those reported in China [43]. This could be explained by the fact that although phylogenetically China has three main subgroups of goatpox, only one is circulating in the south i.e. bordering Vietnam [43].

These findings pose a challenge to the aspiration of Vietnam’s to transform the future potential of goat farming into an industry. The local consumer prefers fresh chevon than frozen products due to food safety issues linked to the weakness of their cold chain system [44]. Furthermore, goats as well as being a form of meat for the family and community, goat serves as a cash reserve for the poor farmer [45].

The current study also revealed most of the goat husbandry system is mainly extensive which may hamper the possibility to initiate goat production within the mountainous areas. Likewise, as revealed here, goats reared under the intensive system offers a better farming milieu for disease control which the farmer or nation should adopt to improve productivity. Under an intensive system, the ease to isolate and locate an infected animal and area enabling an effective diagnosis and thus control and prevention. It is rather difficult or almost impossible to perform such tasks (isolate and locate) under free grazing or nomadic conditions. Nevertheless, Vietnam should make formidable reforms to the livestock industry since goats in Vietnam are still (as found in this study) and in future will be reared by the poorer farmers halting an increase in goat population and productivity. This is even much more worrying especially with respect to a lack of herd health program (disease control). Thus, in order to bring the industry to greater heights, offsetting devastating disease like goat pox is mandatory. It is believed that these findings on goat pox will facilitate the government to continue working on improving disease identification and control to avoid hindrance in goat production.

Conclusions

Goat pox infection in North Vietnam if left unattended may lead to devastating effect to the goat industry. Thus, needs arises not only to effectively control the disease but also to downregulate risks factors involved including that of current state of rearing. This includes provision of veterinary extension services to the poor farmers adopting the extensive system in order to improve productivity via an effective herd health program.

Methods

Ethics, consent, questionnaire and study area

Since North Vietnam does not impose ethics on the use of local animals for research, all procedures involving in this study were conducted in compliance to the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching (2010) [46]. A well-defined questionaire composed of farm management information (total number of animals/age groups, breed, farming system and detailed health status) relevant to goat pox were noted during the visit and all participating farms consented the research via a written permission.

The sample size (n) was determined using the formula:

$$ \mathrm{n}={\mathrm{Z}}^2\mathrm{pq}/\mathrm{L} $$

where, Z = standard normal distribution at 95% confidence interval = 1.96

= prevalence of similar work (Babiuk 2008) = 33%

$$ \mathrm{q}=\mathrm{p}\hbox{-} 1 $$
$$ \mathrm{L}=\mathrm{allowable}\ \mathrm{error}\ \mathrm{taken}\ \mathrm{at}\ 5\%=0.05 $$

Thus, the minimum required sample size obtained from the formula for this study was 477.

Disease investigation had been conducted in six provinces in North Vietnam where goat farming is most actively conducted (Fig. 8). In general, goat farming in Vietnam is mainly divided into either extensive or intensive system as previously described [47]. During the visit, farms with clinically affected goats and those in close contact with the herd within outbreak provinces were further assessed. A thorough physical examination of clinical signs was done with emphasis on predilection site of goat pox lesions and animals with severe clinical signs were then post mortem.

Questionaire and data collection

The questionnaire was structured to encompass information of the farm, management system practiced by the owner during an interview. It is compartmentalised to contain three main sections namely; ownership and farm information, herd information and physical plus pathology findings. The template of this questionnaire is attached separately as an Additional file 1.

Tissue sampling

Based on the physical examination, a total of 11,688 goats that falls under the category of being affected or those in contact were chosen. Out of these, 1481 had clear cut signs suggestive of goat pox whereby fresh tissue samples totaling to 128 were collected for further pathology and virology diagnoses.

Approximately 2–3 g of lesions were taken and placed in PBS (7.2 pH with 1% gentamycin) and stored under chilled conditions during delivery. Samples were then transferred to Key Veterinary Biotechnology Laboratory, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam. Roughly a 1 cm3 lesion the of skin, lung, heart, liver, intestine, spleen, kidney and lymph node were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and later processed using routinely for histopathological examination.

Polymerase chain of reaction (PCR)

DNA extraction was performed using DNeasy Blood Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Gemany) following manufacturer instruction. Primers used for identifying Capripoxvirus in clinical specimens as previously designed [39].

The forward primer was P1: 5′-TTTCCTGATTTTTCTTACTAT-3 ‘and the reverse primer was P2: 5’-AAATTATATACGTAAATAAC-3′. 50 μl of reaction mixture contained 5 μl buffer, 3 μl of MgCl2, 2 μl of dNTP mix (10 mM), 2 μl (10 pmol/μl) of each primer, 0.4 μl of Taq-DNA, 12 μl biopsy supernatant and 23.6 μl of RNAse free water. PCR cycle started with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 mins, followed with 35 cycles (1 min each) of denaturation at 94 °C, annealing at 50 °C, extension at 72 °C and final extension at 72 °C for 10 mins. The PCR products were examined by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining.

Data analysis

All data obtained was subjected to statistical analysis using the SAS 9.0 (2002), USA and only differences of p < 0.005 were considered as significant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or used during the current study are not available to public as it is owned by the Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Vietnam. However, these can be requested via email from the corresponding authors; Dr. Pham Hong Trang (htrang2910@gmail.com) and/or Prof. Dr. Mustapha M Noordin (noordinmm@upm.edu.my).

Abbreviations

bp:

base pair

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

OD:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

n:

number of animals

Chisq:

Chi Square test

References

  1. 1.

    Santhamani R, Yogisharadhya R, Venkatesan G, Shivachadra SB, Pandey AB, Ramakrishnan MA. Detection and differentiation of sheeppox virus and goatpox virus from clinical sample using 30 kDa RNA polymerase subunit (RPO30) gene based PCR. Vet World. 2013;9:2231–0916.

  2. 2.

    Ahmed ZEM, Abdelmalik IK, Muaz MA. An epidemiological study of sheep and goat pox outbreaks in the Sudan. Food Biol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.19071/fbiol.2016.v5.3007.

  3. 3.

    Tuppurainen ES, Venter EH, Shisler JL, Gari G, Mekonnen GA, Juleff N, Lyons NA, De Clercq K, Upton C, Bowden TR, Babiuk S, Babiuk LA. Review: Capripoxvirus Diseases: current status and opportunities for control. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12444.

  4. 4.

    Babiuk S, Bowden TR, Boyle DB, Wallace DB, Kitching RP. Capripoxviruses: an emerging worldwide threat to sheep, goats and cattle. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008;55:263–72.

  5. 5.

    Liang JB, Paengkoum P. Current status, challenges and the way forward for dairy goat production in Asia – conference summary of dairy goats in Asia. Asian Australasian J Anim Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0272.

  6. 6.

    Zangana IK, Abdullah MA. Epidemiological, clinical and histopathological studies of lamb and kid pox in Duhok, Iraq. Bulg J Vet Med. 2013;16:133–8.

  7. 7.

    Roy A, Jaisree S, Balakrishnan S, Senthilkumar K, Mahaprabhu R, Mishra A, Maity B, Ghosh TK, Karmakar AP. Molecular epidemiology of goat pox viruses. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12763.

  8. 8.

    Panchanathan V, Chaudhri G, Karupiah G. Correlates of protective immunity in poxvirus infection: where does antibody stand? Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:80–6.

  9. 9.

    Bhanuprakash V, Hosamani M, Venkatesan G, Balamurugan V, Yogisharadhya R, Singh RK. Animal poxvirus vaccines: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11:1355–74.

  10. 10.

    Bhanuprakash V, Hosamani M, Singh RK. Prospects of control and eradication of Capripox from the Indian subcontinent: a perspective. Antivir Res. 2011;91:225–32.

  11. 11.

    Mizaie K, Barani SM, Bokaie S. A review of sheep pox and goat pox: perspective of their control and eradication in Iran. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2015.b117.

  12. 12.

    Abutarbush SM. “Lumpy skin disease”. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases of livestock. Jagadeesh Bayry. Springer, 2017; 321–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47426-7.

  13. 13.

    Venkatesan G, Balamurugan V, Singh RK, Bhanuprakash V. Goat pox virus isolated from an outbreak at Akola, Maharashtra (India) phylogenetically related to Chinese strain. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9564-8.

  14. 14.

    Youwen L, Haihong J, Jianjun H. Identification of four goatpox outbreaks in Xinjiang of China. In: Human Health and Biomedical Engineering (HHBE) International Conference; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/HHBE.2011.6028993.

  15. 15.

    Jayalakshmi K, Yogeshpriya S, Veeraselvam M, Krishnakumar S, Selvaraj P. Univariable risk factors analysis of goat pox in Thanjavur Delta region. Indian Vet J. 2017;94:19–20.

  16. 16.

    Masoud F, Mahmood MS, Hussain I. Seroepidemiology of goat pox disease in district Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan. J Vet Med Res. 2016;3:1043.

  17. 17.

    Côté SD. Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour. 2005;137:1541–66.

  18. 18.

    Mignon-Grasteau S, Boissy A, Bouix J, Faure J-M, Fisher AD, Hinch GN, Jensen P, Neindre P, Mormede P, Prunet P, Vandeputte M, Beaumont C. Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock. Livest Prod Sci. 2005;93:3–14.

  19. 19.

    Darbon A, Colombi D, Valdano E, Savini L, Giovanni A, Colizza V. Disease persistence on temporal contact networks accounting for heterogeneous infectious periods. R Soc Open Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181404.

  20. 20.

    Fentie T, Fenta N, Leta S, Molla W, Ayele B, Teshome Y, Nigatu S, Assefa A. Sero-prevalence, risk factors and distribution of sheep and goat pox in Amhara region, Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1312-0.

  21. 21.

    Sajid A, Chaudhary I, Sadique U, Maqbol A, Anjum AA, Queshi MS, Hassan ZU, Idress M, Shaid M. Prevalence of goatpox disease in Punjab province of Pakistan. J Anim Plt Sci. 2012;22(2 Suppl):28–32 ISSN: 1018-7081.

  22. 22.

    Rao TVS, Negi BS, Bansal MP. Identification and characterization of differentiating soluble antigens of sheep and goat poxviruses. Acta Virol. 1996;40:259–62.

  23. 23.

    Das PK, Pradhan KC. Epidemiological studies on goatpox in Ganjam goats of Orissa. Indian J Vet Med. 2006;26:34–5.

  24. 24.

    Joshi RK, Ali SL, Shakya S, Rao VN. Clinico-epidemiological studies on a natural outbreak of goat pox in Madhya Pradesh. Indian Vet J. 1999;76:279–81.

  25. 25.

    Pawaiya RVS, Bhagwan SK, Dubey SC. Histo-pathological study of goat pox in a natural outbreak. Indian J Small Ruminants. 2008;14:266–70.

  26. 26.

    Babuik S, Bowden TR, Parkyn G, Dalman B, Hoa DM, Long NT, Vu PP, Bieu DX, Copps J, Boyle DB. Yemen and Vietnam Capripoxviruses demonstrate a distinct host preference for goats compared with sheep. J Gen Virol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.004507-0.

  27. 27.

    Manjunatha-Reddy GB, Sumana K, Babu S, Yadav J, Balamuragan V, Hemadri D, Patil SS, Suresh KP, Gajendragad MR, Rahman H. Pathological and molecular characterization of Capripox virus outbreak in sheep and goats in Karnataka. Indian J Vet Path. 2015;39:11–4.

  28. 28.

    Nandi S, De UK, Choudhary S. Current status of contagious ecthyma or orf disease in goat and sheep- a global perspective. Small Ruminant Res. 2011;96:73–82.

  29. 29.

    Caporale M, Di Gialleonorado L, Janowicz A, Wilkie G, Shaw A, Savini G, Van Rijn PA, Mertens P, Di Ventura M, Palmarini M. Virus and host factors affecting the clinical outcome of bluetongue virus infection. J Virol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01641-14.

  30. 30.

    Balamurugan V, Hemadri D, Gajendragad MR, Singh RK, Rahman H. Diagnosis and control of peste des petits ruminants: a comprehensive review. Virus Dis. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-013-0188-2.

  31. 31.

    Chitra MA, Jayalakshmi K, Ponnusamy P, Manickam R, Ronald BSM. Dermatophilus congolensis infection in sheep and goats in Delta region of Tamil Nadu. Vet World. 2017;10:1314–8.

  32. 32.

    Embury-Hyatt C, Babiuk S, Manning L, Ganske S, Bowden TR, Boyle DB. Pathology and viral antigen distribution following experimental infection of sheep and goats with capripoxvirus. J Comp Path. 2012;146:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2011.12.001.

  33. 33.

    Jun WL, Zhang HT, Wang F, Cheng JJ, Hong-Ying SI. Clinical diagnosis technique of goat pox diseases. Agric Sci Technol. 2010;11:91–9.

  34. 34.

    Kumar A, Hirpurkar SD, Sannat C, Gilhare VR. Adaptation of Capripox virus isolate from goats in heterologous cells. J Anim Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-940X.2015.00113.8.

  35. 35.

    Verma S, Verma LK, Gupta VK, Katoch VC, Dogra V, Pal B, Sharma M. Emerging Capripoxvirus disease outbreak in Himachal Pradesh, a northern state of India. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011;58:79–85.

  36. 36.

    Kumar J, Gupta VK. Pathological study of goat pox in a natural outbreak. Indian Vet J. 2015;92:70–1.

  37. 37.

    Nyadolgor U, Usuhgerel S, Baatarjargal P, Altanchimeg A, Odbile R. Histopathological study for using of pox inactivated vaccine in goats. J Agric Sci. 2015;15:51–5.

  38. 38.

    Manimaran K, Mahaprabhu R, Jaisree S, Hemalatha S, Ravimurugan T, Pazhanivel N, Roy P. An outbreak of sheep pox in an organized farm of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Anim Res. 2017;51:162–4.

  39. 39.

    Ireland DC, Binepal YS. Improved detection of capripoxvirus in biopsy samples by PCR. J Virol Methods. 1998;74:1–7.

  40. 40.

    Heine HG, Stevens MP, Foord AJ, Boyle DB. A capripoxvirus detection PCR and antibody ELISA based on the major antigen P32, the homolog of the vaccinia virus H3L gene. J Immunol Methods. 1999;227:187–96.

  41. 41.

    Mahmoud MA, Khafagi MH. Detection, identification and differentiation of sheep pox virus and goat pox virus from clinical cases in Giza Governorate, Egypt. Vet World. 2016;9:2231–0916.

  42. 42.

    Zhao Z, Wu G, Yan X, Zhu X, Li J, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Zhang Q. Development of duplex PCR for differential detection of goat pox and sheep pox viruses. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1179-0.

  43. 43.

    Zeng XC, Chi XL, Wenbo WL, Li HM, Huang XH, Huang YF, Rock LSH, Wang SH. Complete genome sequence analysis of goatpox virus isolated from China shows high variation. Vet Microbiol. 2014;173:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.07.013.

  44. 44.

    Nguyen-Viet H, Tuyet-Hanh TT, Unger F, Dang-Xuan S, Grace D. Food safety in Vietnam: where we are at and what we can learn from international experiences. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0249-7.

  45. 45.

    Anonymous. (2013). Agricultural transformation & food security 2040–vietnam country report, japan international cooperation agency. http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12145546.pdf Accessed 20 June 2019.

  46. 46.

    Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS). Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. 3rd ed; 2010. http://www.fass.org. Accessed 22 Jan 2019.

  47. 47.

    Devendra C. Dynamics of goat meat production in extensive Systems in Asia: improvement of productivity and transformation of livelihoods. Agrotechnol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9881.1000131.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to extend their thanks to thank all staff of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Vietnam who have participated in the collection of epidemiology data and analysis of samples for the study. We would like to acknowledge deepest gratitude to the farm owners who have unselfishly cooperated in making the study a success.

Funding

This study was fully funded by the Vietnam International Education Department Fellowship, Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam (911 Research Project Grant Scheme) commencing from the design of the study, sample collection, analysis and interpretation of the data which the authors gratefully appreciate.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
    • Trang Hong Pham
    • , Mohd Azmi Mohd Lila
    • , Nor Yasmin Abd. Rahaman
    •  & Mustapha M. Noordin
  2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia-Lam District, Hanoi, 010000, Vietnam
    • Trang Hong Pham
    • , Huong Lan Thi Lai
    •  & Lan Thi Nguyen
  3. Institute of Veterinary Research and Development of Central Vietnam, Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa, 650000, Vietnam
    • Khien Van Do
Authors
  1. Trang Hong Pham
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Mohd Azmi Mohd Lila
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Nor Yasmin Abd. Rahaman
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Huong Lan Thi Lai
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  5. Lan Thi Nguyen
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  6. Khien Van Do
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  7. Mustapha M. Noordin
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

THP, HLTH, LTN and KVD conceived the research grant; THP and MMN analysed and interpreted the results; THP and MMN drafted the manuscript with contribution from all authors; MMN, MAML, NYAR revised the manuscript; MMN and MAML supervised running of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Trang Hong Pham or Mustapha M. Noordin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving in this study were vetted by the Vietnam International Education Department Fellowship, Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam (911 Research Project Grant Scheme) in compliance to the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching (2010) [46], since North Vietnam does not impose ethics on the use of local animals for research. Informed consent form (field studies and sampling) was filled by the farmers whom are owners or managers of the farms that participated in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, T.H., Lila, M.A.M., Rahaman, N.Y.A. et al. Epidemiology and clinico-pathological characteristics of current goat pox outbreak in North Vietnam. BMC Vet Res 16, 128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02345-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • North Vietnam
  • Goat pox
  • Epidemiology
  • Pathology
  • Industry

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us