Skip to main content

Antinociceptive effect of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in rabbits undergoing experimental knee surgery

Abstract

Aim

The current study aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in rabbits undergoing knee surgery.

Materials and methods

This study was performed on 24 male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.8 to 3.0 kg and was allocated into three groups. All groups were anaesthetized by intramuscular (IM) injection of 35 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg xylazine, 0.1 mg/kg butorphanol. Rabbits in Group A received epidural analgesia of 4 mg/kg lidocaine 2%; Group B rabbits received epidural analgesia of 4 mg/kg tramadol 5%, and Group C rabbits received epidural analgesia of a combination of 4 mg/kg lidocaine and 4 mg/kg tramadol. Prior to and during surgery, the following parameters were recorded in a regular pre-set time interval: onset time of analgesia (OT), duration of flaccid paralysis (DFP), duration of analgesia (DA), onset and duration of sensory blockade, onset and duration of motor blockade, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and rectal temperature (RT).

Results

The mean OT demonstrated a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in Group C (46.5 ± 1.4 sec) compared to Group A and B (61.0 ± 2.4 and 54.5 ± 3.5 sec), respectively. DFP was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in Group C (35.5 ± 2.9 min) than in Group A and B (17.6 ± 1.4 and 21.8 ± 3.6), respectively. DA showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in group C (45.8 ± 3.3 min) compared to groups A and B, respectively (23.3 ± 1.1 and 31.5 ± 2.3). Heart rate, RR, and RT significantly decreased in Group C compared to the other groups.

Conclusion

According to the current study findings, lumbosacral epidural administration of lidocaine combined with tramadol could be a better choice for potentiating the analgesia than administration of either drug separately and may be safely used in rabbits undergoing knee surgery.

Peer Review reports

Background

Due to its proximity to the spinal cord receptors responsible for the modulation and transmission of nociceptive signals, lumbosacral analgesia is an effective method of analgesia [1, 2]. Lidocaine HCl is the most commonly used anesthetic agent administrated for epidural analgesia that is characterized by a rapid onset of action and effective desensitization [3]. Since the duration of analgesia after lidocaine is relatively short, re-dosing of the agent is required for relatively long surgical operations [4]. Combining local anesthetic with tranquilizers or opioids results in a more extended duration of analgesia and decreases the dose and the side effects of the anesthetic drugs [5,6,7].

Opioids are used to improve the quality, extend the duration of analgesia, speed up the onset time of analgesia, and prolong the duration of flaccid paralysis and analgesia [8]. Lumbosacral use of opioids seems to be a valuable tool for managing postoperative pain, mainly as part of a balanced analgesia protocol [9]. Opioids are used to improve analgesia as an adjuvant to local anesthetic [10] and ketamine [11, 12]. Tramadol is a synthetic analogue of codeine that has been demonstrated to provide prolonged epidural analgesia in humans [13]. Tramadol utilization has been reported for the management of moderate, severe pain and postoperative epidural analgesia in cattle [14], goats [15], dogs [16], horses [17], camels [10], rabbits [18], and cats [19].

Rabbits are commonly used in experimental orthopedic research, where potent analgesia is required [20]. However, the use of xylazine and ketamine anesthesia in rabbits is commonly used in experimental research, particularly in orthopedic ones, because it provides adequate anesthesia with no pain response. The nociception may still not be completely alleviated. The current research aimed to investigate the use of lumbosacral administration of lidocaine and tramadol to improve the analgesic effect in rabbits undergoing knee surgery.

Results

The mean OT was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in Group C (46.5 ± 1.4 seconds) compared to groups A and B, with values of (61.0 ± 2.4 and 54.5 ± 3.5 seconds), respectively. The mean DFP was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in Group C (35.5 ± 2.9 minutes) compared to groups Group A and B, with means of (17.6 ± 1.4 and 21.8 ± 3.6 minutes) respectively. The mean DA was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in Group C (45.8 ± 3.3 minutes) compared to Group A and B (23.3 ± 1.1 and 31.5 ± 2.3 minutes), respectively. Mean sensory blockade onset was significantly decreased in Group C (1.0 ± 0.1 minutes) compared to groups A and B, with values of (1.5 ± 0.4 and 1.6 ± 0.3 minutes) respectively. The mean time to the maximum sensory blockade was significantly decreased in Group C (3.1 ± 0.3 minutes) compared to groups A and B (3.6 ± 0.6 and 3.7 ± 0.3 minutes), respectively. The mean duration of sensory blockade was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in group C (57.8 ± 1.7 minutes) compared to groups A and B, with values of (54.2 ± 1.2 and 54.1 ± 1.2 minutes), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 The mean ± standard deviation of onset time (OT) (sec), duration of flaccid paresis (DFP) (min), duration of analgesia (DA) (min), sensory blockade onset (min), time to maximum sensory blockade (min), duration of sensory blockade (min), motor blockade onset (min), and time to maximum motor blockade (min) in rabbits. Group A: lidocaine epidural, Group B: tramadol epidural, and Group C: lidocaine- tramadol epidural

The mean motor blockage onset time was significantly decreased in Group C to reach (1.1 ± 0.1 minutes) compared to groups A and B, which have (1.8 ± 0.3 and 1.6 ± 0.3 minutes) respectively. Group C had a significantly shorter mean time to maximum motor blockade (2.60.2 minutes) than groups A and B, which had (3.5 ± 0.4 and 3.5 ± 0.5 minutes) respectively. The mean duration of motor blockade was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in group C (37.0 ± 1.8 minutes) compared to groups A and B, with values of (31.7 ± 1.6 and 30.5 ± 2.9 minutes) respectively.

The mean HR was significantly decreased in all groups (P < 0.05) from baseline, with the lowest value recorded at 60 min postoperatively with the following values: (124.0 ± 0.6 vs. 144 ± 0.4 in Group A, 123.7 ± 0.8 vs. 144 ± 0.4 in Group B, and 103.7 ± 0.5 vs. 145 ± 1.5 beat per min in Group C). The mean RR was significantly decreased in groups A and B (P < 0.05) from baseline (60 ± 0.6), with the lowest value recorded at 60 min postoperatively to be 49.7 ± 0.7 and 44.3 ± 0.8 breaths per min, respectively. The mean RR was significantly decreased in group C (P > 0.05) from baseline (59.5 ± 0.8), with the lowest value recorded at 75 min postoperatively (34.3 ± 0.8 breaths per min). The mean RT was significantly decreased in all groups (P < 0.05), with the lowest value recorded at 60 min postoperatively (38.3 ± 0.05 vs. 39.4 ± 0.08 C° in Group A, 37.2 ± 0.04 vs. 39.5 ± 0.07 C° in Group B, and 37.2 ± 0.04 vs. 39.5 ± 0.07 C° in Group C; Table 2).

Table 2 The mean ± standard deviation of HR (beat/ min), RR (breath/ min) and RT (°C) measured at different times 10 minutes prior- and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes post- the epidural analgesia in rabbits. Group A: lidocaine epidural, group B: tramadol epidural, and group C: lidocaine-tramadol epidural

Discussion

Although xylazine–ketamine anesthesia causes a state of unconsciousness and the animals do not experience pain, where the nociception may not be abolished entirely [3, 21]. While the clinical evaluation of adequate intraoperative antinociception may be difficult, increased HR, RR, and RT may be observed in anesthetized animals in response to extensive surgical stimulation [5]. Meanwhile, blocking these responses by increasing xylazine and ketamine doses could result in severe cardio-respiratory depression [3]. Consequently, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination in producing intraoperative antinociception and analgesia in the immediate postoperative period without inducing clinically significant changes in HR, RR, and RT.

Rabbits were used in the present study because many reports have revealed that rabbits are a good model for studying the epidural block technique and evaluating the sensory and motor loss under standardized experimental conditions [22, 23]. Epidural analgesia could be used in painful surgical procedures for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia as well as continuous pain relief, particularly in animals with chronic pain [18].

Induction of lumbosacral epidural analgesia in ferrets and rabbits is bearly identical to that of the technique described for dogs and cats, with the exception that at the time of entry into the epidural space, the definitive popping sensation is rarely detected when the inner arcuate ligament is punctured [18]. Tramadol has been used intravenously, resulting in prolonged analgesia without severe side effects in horses [24]. Herein, the mean onset time of analgesia was significantly shorter with lidocaine tramadol combination than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, the duration of analgesia was longer with the lidocaine tramadol combination than in the other groups (P < 0.05), indicating that adding tramadol to lidocaine accelerates and prolongs the onset of analgesia. Similar findings were reported in a previous study conducted on ruminants and donkeys [25, 26].

The mean duration of flaccid paralysis was significantly longer in the lidocaine tramadol combination group compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). This finding can be attributed to a synergistic effect between lidocaine and tramadol. Combining the two drugs can decrease the side effects of each individual drug and increase the duration of flaccid paralysis and analgesia [27].

Tramadol is an analgesic with central effects acting on opioid receptors and inhibiting the reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin [13]. The mean duration of sensory and motor blockade was longer in the lidocaine tramadol combination group compared to the other groups (p < 0.05), which was also reported in Tavakoli’s study [18]. In groups A, B, and C, the mean HR, RR, and RT decreased significantly from baseline. In contrast to Atiba’s research [28], who reported that HR, RR, and RT were non-significance different from baseline values after epidural administration of lidocaine and tramadol alone or in combination in buffalo calves.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings of this study indicated that the combination of tramadol-lidocaine produced good analgesia with relatively rapid onset and increased duration of action compared to each drug alone. This combination may also be beneficial in the clinical practice for a longer duration in orthopedic surgery.

Materials and methods

Study sample

In this study, a total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.8 to 3.0 kg were used in this study. The rabbits were kept in the animal house of Mansoura Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt, for two weeks before starting the experiment. All animals had free access to food and water and were kept under standardized conditions. Animals were allowed to acclimatize to their cages and surroundings for several days. This study was approved by the Scientific Research Ethical Committee, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt Code No. Ph.D./15.

Study design

All rabbits received an intramuscular injection of xylazine HCl (Xylaject, 20 mg/ ml, ADWIA, Cairo, Egypt) at a dose of 5 mg/kg and ketamine HCl (Aneket®, 50 mg/ ml, NEON Laboratories Ltd., Mumbai, India) at the dose of 15 mg/kg. The technique of lumbosacral injection in rabbits is similar to that described in dogs [29]. The lumbosacral area was aseptically prepared. The hind limbs of the rabbits were flexed to allow the greatest opening of the lumbosacral space. The epidural injections were performed via 50 mm, 20-gauge needles. Before the injection, aspiration was used to ensure that the needle did not penetrate the blood vessels. The correct placement of the needle was confirmed by the hanging drop technique and lack of resistance during the injection. The rabbits were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 8) as follows:

Group A: lumbosacral administration of 4 mg/kg of lidocaine (Debocaine, 20 mg/ ml, the Arab Company for Gelatin and Pharmaceutical industries, Cairo, Egypt).

Group B: lumbosacral administration of 4 mg/kg tramadol (Minpharm, 50 mg/ mL, Grünethal, Germany).

Group C: lumbosacral administration of a combination of 4 mg/kg lidocaine HCL and 4 mg/kg tramadol.

Study design

The knee joint was aseptically prepared, and an anteromedial parapatellar incision was used to open the joint. Using an electric drill with a 3.5 mm diameter bit, an osteochondral defect of 5 mm depth and 4 mm width was created in the middle of the trochlear groove. The joint was flushed with sterile normal saline. The joint capsule was sutured using a 3–0 polyglycolic acid suture (EGYSORB, Taisier Med, Cairo, Egypt) with a simple continuous suture pattern. The subcutaneous tissues were closed using a subcuticular suture pattern using the same suture material, and the skin incision was closed using polypropylene 2\0 (PROLENE, ETHICON, USA). In all groups, the mean average duration of surgery was 15 ± 1.1 min.

Monitoring

The heart rate (HR) (beats/min) was recorded by auscultation using a stethoscope, respiratory rate (RR) (breath/ min) was documented by counting thoracic excursions, and the rectal temperature (RT) was documented using a digital temperature. These parameters were evaluated at − 10, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes before and after lumbosacral drug administration.

The sensory blockade was recorded by observing an aversive reaction to pinprick stimulus with a needle (18-gauge) starting from the sacral to thoracic skin every minute for 5 minutes after lumbosacral injection and then every five minutes till the sensory blockade vanished. The motor activities were continuously recorded and assessed every 30 sec till reaching the motor blockade peak intensity and then evaluated every five minutes.

The lumbosacral epidural anesthetic indices were recorded for each rabbit according to [5, 18], which include:

Time to onset of analgesia (OT): Time that elapsed between injection of the drug and loss of response to pinprick.

Duration of flaccid paralysis (DFP): Time that elapsed between injecting the drug and rabbits becoming ambulatory.

Duration of analgesia (DA): Time that elapsed between injection of the drug and return of response to pinprick in the tail and both hind limbs.

The onset time of sensory blockade: Time between administration of the drug and the start of sensory blockade.

Duration of sensory blockade: A time interval during which the animal presented sensory blockade.

Time to maximum sensory blockade: Time between administering the drugs and reaching the maximum sensory blockade.

The onset time of motor blockade: Time that elapsed between administration of the drug and the start of motor blockade.

Duration of motor blockade: Time that the animal presented motor blockade.

Data analysis

The normality of qualitative values was assessed using normal probability plots and the Kolmogorov-Simonov test generated with the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS. All experimental data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (STD). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data, followed by Tukey-Kramer HSD for multiple comparisons to assess the analgesic effect of lidocaine and tramadol. Statistical analyses were performed using a commercial program (JMP, version 5.0.1a). The level of statistical significance for all tests was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Sibanda S, Hughes JL, Pawson PE, Kelly G, Bellenger CR. The effects of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on the stress response in dogs undergoing femoro-tibial joint surgery. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006;33:246–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Troncy E, Junot S, Keroack S, Sammut V, Pibarot P, Genevois J-P, et al. Results of preemptive epidural administration of morphine with or without bupivacaine in dogs and cats undergoing surgery: 265 cases (1997–1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:666–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antończyk A, Liszka B, Skrzypczak P, Kiełbowicz Z. Comparison of analgesia provided by lidocaine or morphine delivered epidurally in rabbits undergoing hindlimb orthopedic surgery. Pol J Vet Sci. 2019;22:31–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rastabi HI, Guraninejad S, Naddaf H, Hasani A. Comparison of the application of lidocaine, lidocaine-dexamethasone and lidocaine-epinephrine for caudal epidural anesthesia in cows. Iran J Vet Res. 2018;19:172.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marjani M, Tavakoli A, Tavakoli J. Comparison the Analgesic Effects of Lidocaine, Xylazine and their Combination Used into the Epidural Space in Rabbits. Iran J Vet Res. 2014;9:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ragab G, Seif M, Halfaya FM. Comparison of tramadol, lidocaine and tramadol-lidocaine combination for epidural analgesia in goats. J Vet Med Res. 2017;24:124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zayed M, Mahmoud E, Khalil A, Salah M, Moustafa M, Youssef M, et al. Lumbosacral injection of lidocaine, detomidine and lidocaine–detomidine in goats: anti-nociceptive effects and changes on haematobiochemical parameters. J Appl Anim Res. 2020;48:57–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pascoe PJ, Dyson D. Analgesia after lateral thoracotomy in dogs epidural morphine vs. intercostal bupivacaine. Vet Surg. 1993;22:141–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steagall PV, Simon BT, Teixeira Neto FJ, Luna SP. An update on drugs used for lumbosacral epidural anesthesia and analgesia in dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azari O, Molaei MM, Roshani H. Caudal epidural analgesia using lidocaine alone and in combination with tramadol in dromedary camels. Iran J Vet Surg. 2014;9:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunduz M, Ozalevli M, Ozbek H, Ozcengiz D. Comparison of caudal ketamine with lidocaine or tramadol administration for postoperative analgesia of hypospadias surgery in children. Pediatr Anesth. 2006;16:158–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Senel AC, Ukinc O, Timurkaynak A. Does the addition of tramadol and ketamine to ropivacaine prolong the axillary brachial plexus block? Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:686287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raffa RB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, Shank RP, Codd EE, Vaught JL. Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an’atypical’opioid analgesic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;260:275–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baniadam A, Afshar FS, Ahmadian F. Analgesic effects of tramadol hydrochloride administered via caudal epidural injection in healthy adult cattle. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71:720–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dehkordi SH, Bigham-Sadegh A, Gerami R. Evaluation of anti-nociceptive effect of epidural tramadol, tramadol-lidocaine and lidocaine in goats. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012;39:106–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mastrocinque S, Almeida TF, Tatarunas AC, Imagawa VH, Otsuki DA, Matera JM, et al. Comparison of epidural and systemic tramadol for analgesia following ovariohysterectomy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2012;48:310–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DeRossi R, Módolo T, Maciel F, Pagliosa R. Efficacy of epidural lidocaine combined with tramadol or neostigmine on perineal analgesia in the horse. Equine Vet J. 2013;45:497–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tavakoli A, Kazemi-Mehrjerdi H. Enhancing analgesic effects of lidocaine in rabbit epidural analgesia using metoclopramide or tramadol. Iran J Vet Sci Technol. 2011;3:41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hermeto LC, DeRossi R, Marques BC, Jardim PH. Potentiation of epidural lidocaine by co-administering tramadol by either intramuscular or epidural route in cats. Can J Vet Res. 2015;79:214–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Amarpal X, Kinjavdekar P, Aithal H, Pawde A, Singh J, Udehiya R. Evaluation of xylazine, acepromazine and medetomidine with ketamine for general anaesthesia in rabbits. Scand J Lab Anim Sci. 2010;37:223–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meylan N, Elia N, Lysakowski C, Tramer M. Benefit and risk of intrathecal morphine without local anaesthetic in patients undergoing major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:156–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston MS. Clinical approaches to analgesia in ferrets and rabbits: Elsevier; 2005. p. 229–35.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malinovsky J-M, Bernard J-M, Baudrimont M, Dumand J-B, Lepage J-Y. A chronic model for experimental investigation of epidural anesthesia in the rabbit. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1997;22:80–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Natalini CC, Robinson EP. Evaluation of the analgesic effects of epidurally administered morphine, alfentanil, butorphanol, tramadol, and U50488H in horses. Am J Vet Res Ismail. 2000;61:1579–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ismail ZB. Epidural analgesia in cattle, buffalo, and camels. Vet World. 2016;9:1450.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marzok MA, El-khodery SA. Comparative analgesic and sedative effects of tramadol, tramadol-lidocaine and lidocaine for caudal epidural analgesia in donkeys (E quus asinus). Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015;42:215–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang C, Chakrabarti MK, Whitwam JG. Specific enhancement by fentanyl of the effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on nociceptive afferent but not on sympathetic efferent pathways in dogs. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 1993;79:766–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Atiba A, Ghazy A, Gomaa N, Kamal T, Shukry M. Evaluation of analgesic effect of caudal epidural tramadol, tramadol-lidocaine, and lidocaine in water buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis). Vet. Med Int. 2015;2015.

  29. Hamilton SM. The Analgesic Effects of Epidural Ketamine in Dogs With a Chemically Induced Synovitis: A Comparison Between Pre-or Post-Injury Administration. ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2003.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Veterinary Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Radiology-Mansoura university staff for their assistance.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Salem M, Rizk A, and Abbas M performed the experiments and drafted the paper. Mosbah E, Zaghloul A, and Karrouf G analyzed the data and contributed to the final revision and submission. All authors read and approved the final maanuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwa Abass.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Welfare and Ethics Committee approved this study of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt (Code No. Ph.D. 15). All procedures in this study were performed following ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in the current research work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salem, M., Rizk, A., Mosbah, E. et al. Antinociceptive effect of lidocaine, tramadol, and their combination for lumbosacral epidural analgesia in rabbits undergoing experimental knee surgery. BMC Vet Res 18, 252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03360-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03360-y

Keywords

  • Lumbosacral
  • Lidocaine
  • Tramadol
  • Ketamine
  • Rabbits