Skip to main content
Download PDF

Equine vitiligo-like depigmentation in grey horses is related to genes involved in immune response and tumor metastasis

BMC Veterinary Research volume 17, Article number: 336 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In horses, the autoimmune disease vitiligo is characterized by the loss of melanocytes and results in patchy depigmentation of the skin around the eyes, muzzle and the perianal region. Vitiligo-like depigmentation occurs predominantly in horses displaying the grey coat colour and is observed at a prevalence level of 26.0–67.0% in grey horses compared with only 0.8–3.5% in non-grey horses. While the polygenetic background of this complex disease is well documented in humans, the underlying candidate genes for this skin disorder in horses remain unknown. In this study we aim to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for identifying putative candidate loci for vitiligo-like depigmentation in horses.

Methods

In the current study, we performed a GWAS analysis using high-density 670 k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 152 Lipizzan and 104 Noriker horses, which were phenotyped for vitiligo-like depigmentation by visual inspection. After quality control 376,219 SNPs remained for analyses, the genome-wide Bonferroni corrected significance level was p < 1.33e-7.

Results

We identified seven candidate genes on four chromosomes (ECA1, ECA13, ECA17, ECA20) putatively involved in vitiligo pathogenesis in grey horses. The highlighted genes PHF11, SETDB2, CARHSP1 and LITAFD, are associated with the innate immune system, while the genes RCBTB1, LITAFD, NUBPL, PTP4A1, play a role in tumor suppression and metastasis. The antagonistic pathogenesis of vitiligo in relation to cancer specific enhanced cell motility and/or metastasis on typical melanoma predilection sites underlines a plausible involvement of RCBTB1, LITAFD, NUBPL, and PTP4A1.

Conclusions

The proposed candidate genes for equine vitiligo-like depigmentation, indicate an antagonistic relation between vitiligo and tumor metastasis in a horse population with higher incidence of melanoma. Further replication and expression studies should lead to a better understanding of this skin disorder in horses.

Peer Review reports

Background

Vitiligo-like depigmentation in horses occurs predominantly in animals of grey coat colour and is characterized by progressive patchy depigmentation of the skin around the eyes, muzzle and the perianal region. This skin disorder is caused by the loss of melanocytes that produce epidermal pigment. In humans, vitiligo affects skin areas mainly in the face, hands, feet, and genitals and is observed in 0.5–2.0% of the population [1]. The pathogenesis of human vitiligo is described as an interaction between intrinsic melanocyte defects, autoimmune mechanisms, and environmental and genetic factors [2]. Melanocytes from normal pigmented skin areas of vitiligo patients differ from those of healthy patients as they grow less efficient and exhibit structural defects [1, 3]. In addition to intrinsic abnormalities, it has also been shown that exogeneous oxidative stress factors can initiate a higher level of melanocyte destruction in vitiligo affected individuals [4]. The autoimmune hypothesis, which represents the leading model to explain the etiopathogenesis of vitiligo, rests upon studies that documented higher levels of melanocyte specific antibodies capable of destroying cultured melanocytes in vitro [5, 6]. Moreover, vitiligo affected skin is characterized by elevated infiltration of killer cells and inflammatory dendritic cells and the higher level of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes in blood and skin of vitiligo patients [7,8,9]. Throughout the last few decades, genetic factors associated with vitiligo and vitiligo-like skin disorders have been studied by the use of high throughput technologies like high-density SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) genotyping and NGS (next generation sequencing) related methods [2, 10, 11]. In humans, more than 40 susceptible loci have been verified by means of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), further supporting established pathways involved in the pathogenesis of this skin disease. To date, the identified risk loci can be assigned to five groups: (a) human leukocyte antigen genes (HLA/MHC region); (b) immunoregulatory genes; (c) melanocyte related genes; (d) apoptotic and cytotoxic genes and (e) loci with unknown functions for vitiligo [2]. However, a ‘convergence theory ‘, which summarizes the combination of all known aetiologic factors that impact melanocyte viability in epidermal tissue has recently been proposed [12].

Although vitiligo has been the object of intensive genomic scientific research in humans [2, 10, 11, 13] the genetic background of this autoimmune disease in horses remains unknown. Currently, phenotypic animal models of vitiligo-like depigmentation have been described in horses [14], dogs [14], cats [14], pigs [1], chickens [1], and mice [1]. In horses, clinical studies were presented for twelve Gelderlands, nine Thoroughbreds, four Arabians, four Belgians, one Oldenburg, one Mecklenburg, and one Quarter Horse [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Further reports of vitiligo-like phenotypes were published for Arabian horses (Arabian fading syndrome) [21, 22] Pura Raza Espanola – P.R.E., Kladrubian, and Lipizzan horses. These horse breeds are characterized by medium to high allele frequencies of the grey coat colour associated STX17 mutation, which is causative for progressive greying and involved in vesicle transport [23,24,25,26].

Population genetic studies providing heritability and genetic correlation estimates for vitiligo-like depigmentation and melanoma in grey horses have also been performed by Curik et al. [24], Hofmanova et al. [25], and Sanchez-Guerrero et al. [26]. In a total population of 11,436 P.R.E. horses (prevalence of vitiligo-like depigmentation ranged from 2.8–20.5%, whereas in 5.044 grey P.R.E. horses higher values from 3.6–49.8% were reported [26]. For 376 grey Kladrubian horses Hofmanova et al. [25] documented a prevalence of 26.0 to 67.0%, and in Lipizzans vitiligo-like phenotypes have been reported to occur in 39.9–50.0% of horses [24, 27]. In all studies an increase of vitiligo-like depigmentation with age was shown, with the largest increase observed between 5 and 7 years. Heritability estimates for this depigmentation phenotype ranged from 0.09 to 0.64. The higher estimates were calculated for samples with higher frequencies of the greying associated G-allele on the STX17 locus (h2 of 0.64 in Lipizzans [24], h2 of 0.62 in grey P.R.E [26]., h2 of 0.35 in grey Kladrubian horses [25]). Genetic correlations between vitiligo-like depigmentation and melanoma were reported as between − 0.19 and 0.28, with the level of progressive greying yielding higher genetic correlations (0.48 to 0.67) to vitiligo-like depigmentation. Curik et al. [24] assigned a partial heritability to the STX17 locus of 0.23, which reduced the polygenetic heritability from 0.64 to 0.41. These results clearly demonstrate that vitiligo-like depigmentation in horses occurs at higher levels in horse breeds selected for grey coat colour and that it is characterized by moderate to medium heritability thereby indicating the presence of environmental effects and/or polygenetic background.

Despite multiple investigations into vitiligo in horses, genomic studies on vitiligo-like depigmentation have yet to be conducted. As such, in this study we performed a genome-wide association study to identify susceptibility genes or loci associated with vitiligo-like depigmentation in a cohort of Lipizzan horses selected for grey coat colour.

Results

Prevalence and effects of coat colour loci on vitiligo-like depigmentation grade

In the sample cohort of 152 phenotyped Lipizzan horses the vitiligo prevalence was 21.7% (33 horses from 152; Table 1). Phenotype distribution by age classes are presented in Fig. 1. From Table 1 and Fig. 1 a slight shift of higher vitiligo-like depigmentation towards higher individual age of horses can be observed, where 12 horses with grade 3 were on average 17.5 years old and 119 horses with grade 0 had an average age of 14.6 years (4 horses younger than 7 years were solid coloured).

Table 1 Observations, percentage, mean age and standard deviation of mean age (s.d.) for vitiligo-like depigmentation grade in 152 Lipizzan horses
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of 152 Lipizzan horses according to vitiligo-like depigmentation grade VIT (blue = grade 0; red = grade 0.5; green = grade 1; brown = grade 2; purple = grade 3) by age classes (class 6 = 4 to 6 years; class 8 = 7 to 8 years; class 10 = 9 to 10 years; class 12 = 11 to 12 years; class 14 = 13 to 14 years; class 18 = 15 to 18 years; class 22 = 19 to 22 years; class 30 = 23 to 34 years)

Full size image

In Table 2 the genotype frequencies for the coat colour loci ASIP, MC1R and STX17 within the sample cohort are given. From the coat colour genotype distribution only one chestnut (MC1R genotype e/e) was detected. Within the other Lipizzans the MC1R locus was nearly fixed for the dominant E-allele, which resulted in an allele frequency of 0.97. The allele frequency for the grey associated G-allele on STX17 was 0.83 and 0.59 for the A-allele on ASIP locus. The sample included 12 Lipizzan horses of non-grey coat colour, which did not exhibit vitiligo-like depigmentation. The generalized linear model (GLM) including the fixed effects ASIP, MC1R and STX17 genotype and age class, was able to explain 13.0% of observed variation in the dataset, whereas only the effect age class revealed a significant p-value of 0.046. The coat colour genotypes of MC1R, ASIP and STX17 did not show an effect on vitiligo-like depigmentation in this sample of Lipizzan horses.

Table 2 Genotype distribution of ASIP, MC1R and STX17 in 152 Lipizzan horses by vitiligo-like depigmentation grade
Full size table

Genome-wide association analysis (GWAS)

The SNP-based heritability estimate for vitiligo-like depigmentation grade reached a level of 0.31 (s.d. 0.13). Genome-wide association analyses resulted in the detection of 17 genome-wide significant SNPs on 10 chromosomes (ECA1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 13, 15, 17, 20 and 23) (Fig. 2). Five SNPs were located within following genes: NUBPL (nucleotide binding protein like) on ECA1 (AX-104837465; p = 1.14e-07; intronic variant), KCTD5 (potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 5) on ECA13 (AX-104387837; p = 1.88e-08; intronic variant), PHF11 (PHD finger protein 11) on ECA17 (AX-104594172; p = 9.97e-08; intronic variant), CARMIL1 (capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 1) (AX-103235989; p = 6.38e-08) and PTP4A1 (protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A1) (AX-103697053; p = 1.06e-07; intronic variant) on ECA20.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Manhattan plot of the GWAS for vitiligo-like depigmentation in 151 Lipizzan and 104 Noriker horses

Full size image

From the significant SNPs, 8 SNPS were located in a window frame of +/− 25 kb containing one or two genes. These annotated genes were: OR6N1 (olfactory receptor 6 N1), OR6N2 (olfactory receptor 6 N2) on ECA5, CLEC4D (C-type lectin domain family 4 member D) on ECA6, HNF4G (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 gamma) on ECA9, LITAFD (LITAF domain containing), CARHSP1 (calcium regulated heat stable protein 1), OR2C1 (olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily C member 1), PDPK1 (3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase 1) and AMDHD2 (amidohydrolase domain containing 2) on ECA13, and RCBTB1 (RCC1 and BTB domain containing protein 1) and SETDB2 (SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2) on ECA17. Lastly, we identified 11 SNPs on eight chromosomes with annotated genes. Exact location, GWAS p-values, and gene annotation of the in total 17 significantly associated SNPs are given in Table 3.

Table 3 Significantly with vitiligo-like depigmentation associated SNPs including information on their position, p-values and annotated genes (genic = SNP located within gene; intergenic = SNP located in a +/− 25 kb window next to the gene)
Full size table

We further replicated the genotypes of the retained eleven SNPs with gene annotation within 1490 samples of the breeds Anglo-Arabian, Shagya-Arabian, Purebred Arabian, Partbred Arabian, Exmoor Pony, Selle Francais, Lipizzan, French Trotter, and Noriker. The sample of Lipizzan horses comprised 377 animals including Lipizzans from Slovak, Croatian and Hungarian stud farms and the samples of 174 Noriker horses contained animals of leopard spotting coat colour besides animals of the three basic colours bay, black and chestnut.

For the Anglo-Arabian, Purebred Arabian and Partbred Arabian samples we assumed according to breeding program definition a potential prevalence of 30–40% animals of grey coat colour. In Shagy Arabians 53% of animals were grey and within Noriker and Exmoor Pony grey coat colour does not segregate. In the breeds Selle Francais and French Trotter grey coat colour may occur at a low to moderate level (5–20%).

Out of the eleven SNPs, six loci (AX-104234663 (ECA5:35,033,603), AX-104673609 (ECA6:36,234,703), AX-104336590 (ECA9:11,650,147), AX-104387837 (ECA13:41,408,155), AX-104370576 (ECA13:41,503,474), AX-103235989 (ECA20:24,186,084)) did not show a meaningful genotype distribution, as higher proportion of genotypes associated with vitiligo-like depigmentation occurred at moderate level also in non-grey samples or samples where vitiligo-like phenotypes were not observed (Table 4).

Table 4 Distribution of SNP genotypes from eleven significantly associated SNPs with gene annotation within the breeds Anglo-Arabian, Shagya-Arabian, Purebred Arabian, Partbred Arabian, Exmoor Pony, Selle Francais, Lipizzan, French Trotter, and Noriker (NA = missing genotype)
Full size table

From the remaining five SNPs, the locus AX-104837465 (ECA1: 170,926,834), located within NUBPL, exhibited a nearly perfect association across breeds (46 heterozygous and 4 homozygous Lipizzans for the associated allele; 2 Noriker heterozygous for the associated allele), and SNP AX-104594172 (ECA17: 21,505,125), located within PHF11, showed a good, plausible, genotype distribution which included 33 Lipizzans, 6 Noriker, 9 Selle Francais, 4 Shagya-Arabians and 1 French Trotter, heterozygous for the vitiligo-like phenotype associated allele. The remaining three SNPs can be classified fair to good, as they indicate plausible associations, however exhibiting higher frequencies of the associated alleles among non-grey breeds.

Figure 3 illustrates the genotype distributions of the resulting five plausible associated SNPs. Together they explain 38.5% of phenotypic variance of vitiligo-like depigmentation grade. Although no perfect association can be seen in the histogram plots, plausible distributions are documented for AX-104837465 on ECA1 (located within NUBPL), AX-104594172 on ECA17 (located within PHF11; intergenic in a +/− 25 kb window of RCBTB1 and SETDB2), and for AX-103697053 on ECA20 (located within PTP4A1). In total, we propose the genes NUBPL, PHF11, SETDB2, RCBTB1, PTP4A1, and at a weaker replication level the genes LITAFD, CARHSP1 and OR2C1 as possible candidates for vitiligo-like depigmentation in grey horses.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of SNP genotypes within phenotype classes of vitiligo-like depigmentation for the candidate SNPs ECA1: AX-104837465, ECA13: AX-104150856, ECA13: AX-104939678, ECA17: AX-104594172, and ECA20: AX-103697053

Full size image

Discussion

The prevalence of vitiligo-like depigmentation in this study was 21.7%, and thus is in agreement with values cited in previous literature. 3.6 to 49.8% of grey P.R.E. horses [26], 26.0 to 67.0% of grey Kladrubian horses [25] and 39.9 to 50.0% of grey Lipizzan horses [24, 27] exhibit this depigmentation disorder. The SNP based heritability for vitiligo-like depigmentation was estimated as 0.31, a value which also corresponds with results published in pedigree-data based studies (h2 ranging from 0.35 to 0.64). While in the works of Curik et al. [24], Seltenhammer et al. [27] and Hofmanova et al. [25], all studied horses were of grey coat colour, the comprehensive data set of Sanchez-Guerrero et al. [26] allowed for the detection of vitiligo-like depigmentation in 0.8 to 3.5% 6392 non-grey horses. As a result, the prevalence of this depigmentation disorder in non-grey horses can be compared to human populations where the autoimmune disease vitiligo was observed in 0.5 to 2.0% of the population [1]. In addition to the higher incidence of vitiligo-like depigmentation, grey horses carrying the STX17 mutation also exhibit a higher incidence of melanoma, which ranges from 46.1 to 50.0% in grey Lipizzans [24, 27], from 12.5 to 16.0% in grey Kladrub horses [25], and from 1.5 to 4.7% in grey P.R.E. horses [26]. In non-grey horses, Sanchez-Guerrera et al. [26] found a markedly lower melanoma incidence ranging from 0.7 to 0.9%. Clinical studies in humans have shown an up to threefold reduced probability of vitiligo patients developing melanoma [28, 29]. Furthermore, several vitiligo susceptibility genes in humans, particularly those expressed in melanocytes, have been detected to be involved in susceptibility to malignant melanoma, but with opposite effects [30]. This inverse relationship led to the suggestion that vitiligo may represent a process of immune surveillance against malignant melanoma [1, 31]. A similar relationship has been reported in Sinclaire miniature swine, where certain breeding lines were selected for a high melanoma incidence [32]. In this animal model up to 85% of individuals develop melanoma, from which 90% resolve spontaneously followed by a vitiligo-like depigmentation of skin and hair (destruction of melanocytes) in the tumor location [33]. Collectively, these findings in vitiligo research correspond with reported prevalence and negative genetic correlations (r from −0.34 to −0.09 [24, 26];) of vitiligo-like depigmentation and melanoma in horses.

Although early genetic segregation studies aimed to document the Mendelian modes of inheritance of human vitiligo, it rapidly became evident that this skin disorder represents a complex, multifactorial disease [31]. Currently, up to 322 genes related to vitiligo in humans have been addressed by 202 scientific articles, all of them incorporated in the VitiVar database [11] (www. http://vitivar.igib.res.in). A common criterion for complex disorders is a polygenetic background including multiple loci with minor effects - making it difficult to derive stable concordance across populations in replication or verification studies. In this GWAS study on vitiligo-like depigmentation in Lipizzan horses, we were able to identify a total of eleven SNPs within or next to 16 annotated genes. Considering the previously discussed differences in vitiligo prevalence between horse breeds of grey and breeds of non-grey coat colour, we examined which of the eleven annotated SNPs resulted in meaningful genotype distributions in breeds (a) selected for grey coat colour, (b) where grey coat colour occurs at low to medium level, and (c) where the grey associated STX17 mutation is not segregating. This replication analysis resulted in five SNPs which led us to 9 different genes NUBPL, PHF11, SETDB2, RCBTB1, PTP4A1, LITAFD, CARHSP1 and OR2C1.

Nucleotide binding protein-like (NUBPL), located on ECA1, is required for the assembly of human mitochondrial complex I, which contains 45 evolutionally conserved mitochondrial and nuclear encoded subunits. In addition to its central role for the mitochondrial respiratory chain, overexpression of NUBPL has been documented in melanoma and colorectal cancer tissue [34, 35]. Although the effect of this gene on melanoma is still unclear, Wang et al. [35] characterized NUBPL as a metastasis-related gene as they were able to show that the overexpression of NUBPL in colorectal cancer tissue was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis and advanced staging of this form of cancer. The authors found that NUBPL induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition through the activation of ERK signaling pathway, a pathway which promotes tumor metastasis. Uncontrolled growth is a necessary step for the development of all cancers and activating mutations of ERK pathway were also shown to be essential for melanoma development and progression [36]. However, the antagonistic pathogenesis of vitiligo in relation to cancer specific enhanced cell motility and/or metastasis on typical melanoma predilection sites (eyes, muzzle, perianal region) may underline a plausible involvement of NUBPL into the genetics of vitiligo-like depigmentation in horses.

The significant SNP on ECA17 was assigned to three different genes: PHF11, SETDB2, RCBTB1. Plant homeodomain zinc finger protein 11 (PHF11) and its neighboring gene SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 2 (SETDB2), are both expressed in cells of the innate immune system and are involved in chromatin remodeling or transcriptional regulation. Several studies associated polymorphisms of these genes with increased serum IgE levels and asthma, eczema, and atopic dermatitis in humans [37, 38]. In more recent studies, SETDB2 has been linked to epigenetic concepts [39]. The histone modifier SETDB2 was found to modulate adaptative resistance mechanisms in tumor development and in macrophage plasticity in inflammatory processes by regulating genomic stability and/or H3K9me3-mediated silencing of gene transcription [39, 40]. Due to their involvement in immune reactions, macrophagy, metastasis promotion, and adaptive resistance in melanoma [39], PHF11 and SETDB2 fit in the classification categories of vitiligo related genes proposed by Shen et al. [2] and Kundu et al. [12]. In close proximity to PHF11 was the gene RCBTB1, which is located within a 25 kb window to the associated SNP on ECA17. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia deletion gene 7 (RCBTB1, also called Clld7) has been described as a general candidate tumor suppressor [41]. Zhou and Münger [42] investigated biological functions of RCBTB1 in osteosarcoma cell lines and found that this protein is responsible for inhibited cell growth and decreased cell viability. The same authors detected an indication for activation of the DNA damage/repair pathway, as reduction of Clld7 in epithelial cells resulted in resistance to apoptosis.

Another gene that was pinpointed by GWAS and replication analysis was PTP4A1, located at ECA20. Protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1 belongs to a group of three prenylated PTPs (PTP4A1/2/3), which support growth and migration of tumor cells [43]. Sacchetti et al. [44] were able to show that PTP4A1 was highly expressed in fibroblasts of patients with the autoimmune disease systemic sclerosis. The tyrosine phosphatase PTP4A1 promotes transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling in human fibroblasts through enhancement of ERK activity. A knockdown of PTP4A1 results in reduced ERK activation and correlates with reduced activity of the protooncogene SRC [44].

The genes LITAFD, CARHSP1 and OR2C1, all located on ECA13, exhibited less specific replication across breeds and cases in GWAS. SNP AX-104150856 is located in a +/− 25 kb window between the genes LITAFD and CARHSP1. Calcium-regulated heat-stable protein 1 (CARHSP1) is reported to act as a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) stability enhancer. As TNF-α is required for the control of infection and the subsequent immune response, it plays a central role for the host response to infection and injury [45]. LITAFD (LITAF domain containing) belongs to the CDIP1/LITAF family. Similar to CARHSP1, the gene LITAF also encodes a transcription factor regulating the gene expression of the inflammatory mediator TNF-α [46]. Considered as tumor suppressor in several cancer types, LITAF was also shown to be involved in immune response and autophagy [47]. For OR2C1 no specific biological roles has been reported yet.

Overall, GWAS analysis of vitiligo-like depigmentation in the current study pinpointed seven genes with known biological role in the following fields: (a) immune response – PHF11, SETDB2, CARHSP1, LITAF; (b) tumor suppression – RCBTB1, LITAF; and (c) enhanced proliferation in metastasis – NUBPL, PTP4A1. While cancer related genes (b) and (c) may reflect the antagonistic relation between vitiligo and melanoma proposed by Spritz [30], the highlighted genes related to immune response represent classical features of the immune regulatory theory of vitiligo pathogenesis proposed by Shen et al. [2].

Conclusions

Given the complex nature of the skin disorder vitiligo, the seven highlighted genes by GWAS of vitiligo-like depigmentation in grey horses need further verification by expression studies and replication studies across breeds. The current study indicates a relationship between this depigmentation phenotype and melanoma in grey horses and represents a research question that needs further investigation.

Material and methods

Sample cohort

In the year 2020, 152 Lipizzan horses (60 mares and 92 stallions) from the Austrian federal stud farm Piber and the Spanish Riding School Vienna were phenotyped for vitiligo-like depigmentation by visual inspection according to the protocol of Curik et al. [24]. The following grades of vitiligo-like depigmentation were recorded: grade 0 = no depigmentation; grade 0.5 = beginning of non-segmental depigmentation via few small spots in the muzzle, perianal region; grade 1 = clearly visible non-segmental depigmentation in muzzle and perianal region; grade 2 = extended distribution of non-segmental depigmentation in face and eventually a few small segmented depigmentation areas, grade 3 = prevalence of extended sharp segmented depigmentation areas around muzzle, eyes and face (Fig. 4). The age of studied horses ranged from 4 to 34 years, with a mean age of 15.06 years (s.d. + 7.05), whereas 140 horses of the sample were older than 6 years, thus taking the etiology of this skin disorder into account [24, 25]. For all phenotyped horses, genotype data was available from previous studies [48,49,50] and this study was performed with the permission by the owner (Spanische Hofreitschule und Lipizzanergestüt Piber GöR). Blood/hair samples from these horses were collected under appropriate terms regarding ethical approvements (Commission for Ethics and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, protocol number: ETK-06/05/2015, in accordance with GSP guidelines and national legislation) and were genotyped using the Axiom Equine Genotyping array (MNEc670k, Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA [51];).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phenotypic classification of vitiligo-like depigmentation

Full size image

SNP quality control

As vitiligo-like depigmentation in grey horses develops with age [24, 25], we can assume that in a certain number of young horses, this depigmentation disorder may not yet be visible. In order to overcome this problem, we included 104 solid coloured horses from the Noriker breed without vitiligo-like characteristics as a control group. Quality control (QC) of the sample cohort consisting of 152 Lipizzan and 104 Noriker horses was performed using the software PLINK 1.07 [52]. SNPs located on sex chromosomes (X: 28,017 SNPs and Y: 1 SNP) and 30.864 SNPs without chromosomal assignment were excluded from further analysis. We further applied a filter for genotyping call rate for individuals of min. 95% and retained SNPs with a minor allele frequency larger than 1%, which resulted in 376,219 SNPs and 255 horses (104 Noriker, 151 Lipizzans) that passed QC.

Determination of MC1R, ASIP and STX17 genotypes and statistical analysis

In order to test the putative effects of the coat colour genes ASIP, MC1R and STX17 on the vitiligo phenotype data, we used the 670 k SNP data to derive the genotypes of respective loci. For MC1R the causative point mutation is directly contained by the SNP AX-104805525 (ECA3:36,259,552) in the Affymetrix® Axiom Equine HD Array. From previous studies [49] the ASIP genotype was known for 118 horses. In a recent study, Corbin et al. [53] used the SNP AX-103951024 (ECA22: 24,877,990) to tag the ASIP deletion [54]. However, the respective SNP genotypes of the 152 analyzed Lipizzans were monomorphic, thus we correlated five SNPs (AX-103929593, ECA22:25,147,724; AX-103057353, ECA22:25,148,247; AX-102968633, ECA22:25,161,695; AX-104134604, ECA22:25,175,554; AX-103402623, ECA22:25,176,678; AX-103271875, ECA22:25,187,112) around the ASIP locus (ECA22:25,165.083-25,173,072) with the known ASIP genotypes of 118 Lipizzan horses derived from KASP (competitive allele specific PCR) analysis according to Rieder et al. [54]. The highest correlation (r = 0.97) was found for the SNP AX-102968633, whereas the correlation of the other four SNPs ranged between 0 and 0.21. Four observations from 118 did not match the KASP results, implying an error rate of 1.15 horses for the SNP derived genotype of 34 horses missing the ASIP genotype information. The STX17 genotype was known for 130 Lipizzan horses from the study of Grilz-Seger et al. [49] by genotyping the causative 4.6 kb duplication in intron 6 of syntaxin 17 following the method of Kavar et al. [55]. In the work of Grilz-Seger et al. [38] the authors demonstrated that the STX17 locus was surrounded by a selection signature, a 350 kb ROH (run of homozygosity) haplotype, that was shared by 70% homozygous grey horses. In order to derive the 22 missing STX17 genotypes, we performed a ROH analysis for all 152 horses in our sample using the software PLINK 1.07 [52] and the following setting: minimal SNP density of one SNP per 50 kb, maximal distance between two homozygous segments of 100 kb, minimum length of homozygous segment of 80 kb and/or 20 consecutive SNPs per segment, one heterozygote and one missing SNP were allowed. The resulting ROHs were assigned to STX17 genotypes as follows: (a) coloured Lipizzans – STX17 genotype g/g; (b) grey Lipizzans with ROH haplotype around STX17 – genotype G/G; (c) grey Lipizzans without ROH around STX17 – genotype G/g. Resulting ROH genotypes of 130 horses were correlated with known STX17 genotypes from fragment genotyping analysis, revealing a correlation of 0.89 (8 from 130 genotypes were wrongly assigned, implying that 1.3 horses out of 22 horses with unknown STX17 genotypes can be wrongly estimated.

To test the putative influence of the factors ASIP, MC1R and STX17 genotype, and age class on vitiligo-like depigmentation grade, we applied the following generalized linear model (GLM):

$${\mathrm{Y}}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{jklm}}=y+\mathrm{agre}\_{\mathrm{class}}_{\mathrm{i}}\kern0.5em {\mathrm{ASIP}}_{\mathrm{i}}+\kern0.5em \mathrm{MC}1{\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{k}}+\kern0.5em \mathrm{STX}{17}_1+\kern0.5em {\mathrm{e}}_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{jklm}}$$

where:

Yijklm = observations.

y = mean.

age_classi = age effect in age classes (6: 4 to 6 years, 8: 7 to 8 years; 10: 9 to 10 years; 12: 11 to 12 years; 14: 13 to 14 years; 18: 15 to 18 years; 22: 19 to 22 years; 30: 23 to 34 years).

ASIPj = effect of ASIP genotype (A/A, A/a, a/a).

MC1Rk = effect of MC1R genotype (E/E, E/e, e/e).

STX17l = effect of STX17 genotype (G/G, G/g, g/g).

eijklm = residual error.

Statistical analyses and graphical representations were performed using the software package SAS [56], SNP data management was done with PLINK 1.07 [52].

GWAS analysis and replication study

GWAS analysis and heritability estimation for vitiligo-like depigmentation grade were performed using the software GCTA v. 1.91.6 [57]. The GWAS was carried out using the mixed linear model association (−mlma) method, thus taking genetic structure and individual relationship within the data into account:

$${Y}_{ij}={b}_j{SNP}_{ij}+{g}_i+\kern0.5em e\sim N\left(0,I{\sigma}_{e^2}\right)$$

where yij was the phenotype of the ith individual, bj was the allele substitution effect of the jth SNP marker, SNPij was the genotype of the ith animal for the jth SNP, gi was the random polygenic effect of the ith individual, and eij was the random residual effect for the ith individual and jth SNP. The polygenic effects (g) followed a normal distribution g ~ N(0, Gσg2), where G was the genomic relationship matrix (calculated as described by Yang et al. [57], and the residuals followed a normal distribution e ~ N(0, Iσe2). The STX17 genotype was included in the GWAS as a covariate. Heritability for vitiligo-like depigmentation grade was estimated by the –reml command in the GCTA software [57].

Adjustment for genome-wide multiple testing of association statistics was carried out according to the Bonferroni method, which adjusts the p value threshold from p = 0.05 to p = 0.05/k, where k is the number of SNPs (376,219) in the GWAS, thus reaching a threshold of p < 1.33e-7. Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile plots were generated in R (www.r-project.com) using the package qqman.

For the identification of potential candidate genes for equine vitiligo-like depigmentation, we applied a two-step procedure, which is described as follows: step 1 – gene annotation: We screened the genome in a +/− 25 kb window frame surrounding each significantly associated SNP in the Ensembl genome database EquCab3.0 (www.ensembl.org). In the event that a SNP was located between two genes within the defined window frame, both genes were selected; step 2 – replication study of significant SNPs with gene annotation. We screened eight horse breeds for genotype distribution of the identified significant SNPs with gene annotation. With this replication study we aimed to determine which of the SNPs were segregating ubiquitously or specific in populations with: (a) higher STX17 G-allele frequency (Lipizzan, Arabian populations); (b) where STX17 G-allele is not segregating (Exmoor Pony and Noriker); and (c) where STX17 G-allele can occur at low to moderate frequency (Selle Francais and French Trotter). The HD 670 k SNP genotype data set was comprised of 1490 samples from 377 Lipizzan horses, 174 Noriker horses, 32 Shagya Arabians, 155 Purebred Arabians, 21 Partbred Arabians, 7 Anglo-Arabians, 273 Exmoor Ponies, 295 Selle Francais, and 156 French Trotters. This data had already been published in Grilz-Seger et al. [50] and was used for this replication study by consent of the authors.

Availability of data and materials

The primary data of this study are owned by different research groups. Primary data of the breeds Lipizzan, Noriker, Shagya Arabian are available from project consortium FFG project number 843464, Veterinary University Vienna, Xenogenetik, five European state stud farms and the Austrian Horse breeders Association, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of project consortium, FFG project number 843464, Veterinary University Vienna, Xenogenetik and partners. Genotype data for the Exmoor Pony breed can be provided by contacting authors Lindgren/Velie or for a larger data set via the following reference: Velie, B.D.; Shrestha, M.; Franҫois, L.; Schurink, A.; Tesfayonas, Y.G.; Stinckens, A.; Blott, S.; Ducro, B.J.; Mikko, S.; Thomas, R.; Swinburne, J.E.; Sundqvist, M.; Eriksson, S.; Buys, N.; Lindgren, G. Using an inbred horse breed in a high density genome-wide scan for genetic risk factors of insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH). PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0152966.

References

  1. Kingsley IE, Harris JE. Animal models of vitiligo: matching the model to the question. Dermatol Sin. 2014;32:240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen C, Gao J, Sheng Y, Dou J, Zhou F, Zheng X, et al. Genetic susceptibility to vitiligo: GWAS approaches for identifying vitiligo susceptibility genes and loci. Front Genet. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00003.

  3. Puri N, Mojamdar M, Ramaiah A. In vitro growth characteristics of melanocytes obtained from adult normal and vitiligo subjects. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88:434–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jimbow K, Chen H, Park JS, Thomas PD. Increased sensitivity of melanocytes to oxidative stress and abnormal expression of tyrosinase-related protein in vitiligo. Brit J Dermatol. 2001;144:55–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroll TM, Bommiasamy H, Boissy RE, Hernandez C, Nickoloff BJ, Mestril R. Caroline Le Poole I. 4-Tertiary butyl phenol exposure sensitizes human melanocytes to dendritic cell-mediated killing: relevance to vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:798–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu R, Huang Y, Zhang X, Zhou Y. Potential role of neurogenic inflammatory factors in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. J Cutan Med Surg. 2012;16:230–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogg GS, Rod Dunbar P, Romero P, Chen JL, Cerundolo V. High frequency of skin-homing melanocyte-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in autoimmune vitiligo. J Exper Med. 1998;188:1203–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang KS, Caroli CC, Muhm A, Wernet D, Moris A, Schittek B, et al. HLA-A2 restricted, melanocyte-specific CD8(+) T lymphocytes detected in vitiligo patients are related to disease activity and are predominantly directed against MelanA/MART1. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116:891–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodrigues M, Ezzedine K, Hamzavi I, Pandya AG, Harris JE. Vitiligo working group. New discoveries in the pathogenesis and classification of vitiligo. J Amer Acad Dermatol. 2017;77:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin Y, Andersen G, Yorgov D, Ferrara TM, Ben S, Brownson KM, et al. Genome-wide association studies of autoimmune vitiligo identify 23 new risk loci and highlight key pathways and regulatory variants. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta I, Narang A, Singh P, Manchanda V, Khanna S, Indian genome variation consortium, et al. VitiVar: A locus specific database of vitiligo associated genes and variations. Gene X. 2019;3:100018.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kundu RV, Mhlaba JM, Rangel SM, Le Poole IC. The convergence theory for vitiligo: a reappraisal. Exper Dermatol. 2019;28:647–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lei Z, Yu S, Ding Y, Liang J, Halifu Y, Xiang F, et al. Identification of key genes and pathways involved in vitiligo development based on integrated analysis. Medicine. 2020;99:e21297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tham HL, Linder KE, Olivry T. Autoimmune diseases affecting skin melanocytes in dogs, cats and horses: vitiligo and the uveodermatological syndrome: a comprehensive review. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Naughton GK, Mahaffey M, Bystryn JC. Antibodies to surface antigens of pigmented cells in animals with vitiligo. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1986;181:423–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijer WCP. Dermatological diagnosis in horse and cattle judging. Vet Rec. 1965;77:1046–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meijer WCP. Vitiligo in the horse: the so-called ‘neigeuses’. Neth J Vet Sci. 1961;86:1021–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meijer WCP. Vitiligo in horses and cattle. Neth J Vet Sci. 1962;87:411–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McLean LM, Jones WE. Depigmentation – copper supplement therapy a case report. J Equine Vet Sci. 1983;3:208–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Montes LF, Wilborn WH, Hyde BM, Vaughan JT, Bennett JS. Vitiligo in a quarter horse filly: Clinicopathologic, ultrastructural and nutritional study. J Equine Vet Sci. 2008;28:171–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mozos E, Novales M. sierra MA. Focal hypopigmentation in horses resembling Arabian fading syndrome. Equine Vet Educ 1991;3:122–125.

  22. Scott DW, Miller WH. Pigmentary abnormalities. In: Scott DW, Miller WH, editors. Equine Dermatology. 2nd ed. Maryland Heights: Elsevier/ Saunders; 2011. p. 391–2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosengren Pielberg G, Golovko A, Sundström E, Curik I, Lennartsson J, Seltenhammer MH, et al. A cis-acting regulatory mutation causes premature hair graying and susceptibility to melanoma in the horse. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1004–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Curik I, Druml T, Seltenhammer M, Sundström E, Pielberg GR, Andersson L, et al. Complex inheritance of melanoma and pigmentation of coat and skin in Grey horses. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hofmanová B, Vostrý L, Majzlík I, Vostrá-Vydrová H. Characterization of greying, melanoma, and vitiligo quantitative inheritance in old Kladruber horses. Czech J Anim Sci. 2015;60:443–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sánchez-Guerrero MJ, Solé M, Azor PJ, Sölkner J, Valera M. Genetic and environmental risk factors for vitiligo and melanoma in Pura Raza Español horses. Equine Vet J. 2019;51:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seltenhammer MH, Simhofer H, Scherzer S, Zechner P, Curik I, Sölkner J, et al. Equine melanoma in a population of 296 grey Lipizzaner horses. Equine Vet J. 2003;35:153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Teulings HE, Overkamp M, Ceylan E, Nieuweboer-Krobotova L, Bos JD, Nijsten T, et al. Decreased risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with vitiligo: a survey among 1307 patients and their partners. Brit J Dermatol. 2013;168:162–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paradisi A, Tabolli S, Didona B, Sobrino L, Russo N, Abeni D. Markedly reduced incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in a nonconcurrent cohort of 10,040 patients with vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:1110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spritz RA. The genetics of generalized vitiligo: autoimmune pathways and an inverse relationship with malignant melanoma. Genome Med. 2010;2:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spritz RA, Andersen GH. Genetics of vitiligo. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35:245–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Misfeldt ML, Grimm DR. Sinclaire miniature swine: an animal model of human melanoma. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;43:167–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lentz KJ, Burns RP, Loeffler K, Feeney-Burns L, Berkelhammer J, Hook RR. Uveitis caused by cytotoxic immune response to cutaneous malignant melanoma in swine: destruction of uveal melanocytes during tumor regression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1063–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoek KS. DNA microarray analyses of melanoma gene expression: a decade in the mines. Pigment Cell Res. 2007;20:466–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Wu N, Sun D, Sun H, Tong D, Liu D, et al. NUBPL, a novel metastasis-related gene, promotes colorectal carcinoma cell motility by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:1169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Savoia P, Fava P, Casoni F, Cremona O. Targeting the ERK signaling pathway in melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jang N, Stewart G, Jones G. Polymorphisms within the PHF11 gene at chromosome 13q14 are associated with childhood atopic dermatitis. Genes Immun. 2005;6:262–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Holt RJ, Vandiedonck C, Willis-Owen SA, Knight JC, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. A functional AT/G polymorphism in the 5′-untranslated region of SETDB2 in the IgE locus on human chromosome 13q14. Genes Immun. 2015;16:488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Torrano J, Al Emran A, Hammerlindl H, Schaider H. Emerging roles of H3K9me3, SETDB1 and SETDB2 in therapy-induced cellular reprogramming. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kimball AS, Davis FM, denDekker A, Joshi AD, Schaller MA, Bermick J, et al. The histone methyltransferase Setdb2 modulates macrophage phenotype and uric acid production in diabetic wound repair. Immunity. 2019;51:258–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mabuchi H, Fujii H, Calin G, et al. Cloning and characterization of CLLD6, CLLD7, and CLLD8, novel candidate genes for leukemogenesis at chromosome 13q14, a region commonly deleted in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2870–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou X, Münger K. Clld7, a candidate tumor suppressor on chromosome 13q14, regulates pathways of DNA damage/repair and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9434–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bessette DC, Qiu D, Pallen CJ. PRL PTPs: mediators and markers of cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27:231–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sacchetti C, Bai Y, Stanford SM, Di Benedetto P, Cipriani P, Santelli E, et al. PTP4A1 promotes TGFβ signaling and fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pfeiffer JR, McAvoy BL, Fecteau RE, Deleault KM, Brooks SA. CARHSP1 is required for effective tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA stabilization and localizes to processing bodies and exosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:277–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Takashiba S, Van Dyke TE, Shapira L, Amar S. Lipopolysaccharide-inducible and salicylate-sensitive nuclear factor(s) on human tumor necrosis factor alpha promoter. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bertolo C, Roa S, Sagardoy A, Mena-Varas M, Robles EF, Martinez-Ferrandis JI, et al. LITAF, a BCL6 target gene, regulates autophagy in mature B-cell lymphomas. Brit J Haematol. 2013;162:621–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Grilz-Seger G, Druml T, Neuditschko M, Dobretsberger M, Horna M, Brem G. High-resolution population structure and runs of homozygosity reveal the genetic architecture of complex traits in the Lipizzan horse. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Grilz-Seger G, Dobretsberger M, Brem G, Druml T. Untersuchungen zum Allelstatus einzelner Farbloci und Abzeichen beim Lipizzaner. Züchtungskunde. 2020;92:76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Grilz-Seger G, Neuditschko M, Ricard A, Velie B, Lindgren G, Mesarič M, et al. Genome-wide homozygosity patterns and evidence for selection in a set of European and near eastern horse breeds. Genes. 2019;10:491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Schaefer RJ, Schubert M, Bailey E, Bannasch DL, Barrey E, Bar-Gal GK, et al. Developing a 670k genotyping array to tag ~2M SNPs across 24 horse breeds. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:565–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Corbin LJ, Pope J, Sanson J, Antczak DF, Miller D, Sadeghi R, et al. An independent locus upstream of ASIP controls variation in the shade of the bay coat colour in horses. Genes. 2020;11:606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Rieder S, Taourit S, Mariat D, Langlois B, Guérin G. Mutations in the agouti (ASIP), the extension (MC1R), and the brown (TYRP1) loci and their association to coat color phenotypes in horses (Equus caballus). Mam Genome. 2001;12:450–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kavar T, Čeh E, Dovč P. A simplified PCR-based method for detection of gray coat color allele in horse. Mol Cell Probes. 2012;26:256–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. SAS Institute. SAS university edition. 2021. Cary (NC): SAS institute, Inc.

  57. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism (BMNT), Contract numbers 101332 and 101483. Data collection and genotyping of the Exmoor Pony received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program managed by REA-Research Executive Agency; http://ec.europa.eu/research/rea (FP7/2007e2013) under grant agreement no. 606142 and The Exmoor Pony Society in the UK. Open Access funding for this article was provided by the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni Vienna).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary sciences Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210, Vienna, Austria

    Thomas Druml, Gottfried Brem & Gertrud Grilz-Seger

  2. Equine Genetics & Genomics Group, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Brandon Velie

  3. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden

    Gabriella Lindgren

  4. Livestock Genetics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Gabriella Lindgren

  5. Department of Animal Husbandry, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

    Michaela Horna

  6. GABI, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France

    Anne Ricard

  7. Pôle Développement Innovation Recherche, IFCE, 61310, Gouffern en Auge, France

    Anne Ricard

Authors
  1. Thomas Druml
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gottfried Brem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brandon Velie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gabriella Lindgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michaela Horna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne Ricard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gertrud Grilz-Seger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.Grilz-Seger: research idea, conceptualization, funding acquisition, scientific support, phenotyping; T.Druml: formal analyses, phenotyping, writing of the manuscript; G.Brem: scientific and financial support; G.Lindgren: data contribution, scientific support; B.Velie: data contribution, scientific support; A.Ricard: data contribution, scientific support; M.Horna: data contribution, scientific support. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Druml.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Samples were collected under appropriate terms regarding ethical approvements (Commission for Ethics and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, protocol number: ETK-06/05/2015) in accordance with GSP guidelines and national legislation.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Druml, T., Brem, G., Velie, B. et al. Equine vitiligo-like depigmentation in grey horses is related to genes involved in immune response and tumor metastasis. BMC Vet Res 17, 336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03046-x

Keywords

  • Vitiligo
  • Lipizzan horse
  • GWAS
  • Melanoma
  • Tumor metastasis

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us