Skip to main content
Download PDF

Diverse roles of epidermal growth factors receptors in oral and cutaneous canine melanomas

BMC Veterinary Research volume 16, Article number: 24 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptors participate in the physiological processes such as regulation of morphogenesis, proliferation and cell migration, but when overexpressed or overactivated they may play an important role in neoplastic progression. Melanoma is the most aggressive skin neoplasm and is characterized by elevated invasion and low survival rates in both humans and dogs. In human melanomas the overexpression of EGFR, HER3 or HER4 is associated with poor prognosis. In canine melanomas the epidermal growth factor receptors expression has not been evaluated. Therefore, this study evaluated the expression of epidermal growth factor receptors by immunohistochemistry and investigated their relationship with morphological characteristics and proliferative indices in cutaneous and oral canine melanoma.

Results

In cutaneous melanoma an increased proliferative index was associated with increased cytoplasmic HER4 and reduced EGFR and HER3 protein expression. In oral melanomas, membranous HER2 protein expression correlated with occurrence of emboli, but ERBB2 gene amplification wasn’t observed.

Conclusion

Thus, our work evidenced the relationship between HER4 and the stimulus to cell proliferation in cutaneous melanomas, in addition to the relationship between HER2 and the occurrence of emboli in oral melanomas.

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptors EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 participate in the regulation of cell morphogenesis, proliferation, migration and adhesion [1]. These receptors are transmembrane proteins composed of an extracellular epidermal growth factor (EGF)-binding domain, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain with tyrosine kinase activity [2]. EGF binding leads to receptor dimerization, tyrosine kinase activation and the direct or indirect activation of signaling pathways such as Ras/MAPK, PLCγ1/PKC, Akt and STAT, which subsequently stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation [3, 4].

In various types of neoplasms, overexpression of these receptors is mainly associated with neoplastic progression and poor prognosis [5]. The main factor underlying this overexpression is gene amplification. Amplification of the ERBB genes and polysomy of chromosome 7—where the EGFR gene is located—are correlated with poorer prognosis in human melanoma [6].

EGFR, HER3 and HER4 overexpression is correlated with poorer prognosis in human melanoma [7, 8]. In particular, EGFR overexpression is associated with decreased survival rates and increased tumor size [6, 9]. In addition, EGFR expression is higher in metastases compared with primary tumors [10]. In vitro and in silico studies in human melanoma cell lines and experimental murine melanoma models found that epidermal growth factor receptors are promising therapeutic targets [11, 12].

Canine melanoma is characterized by high invasive and metastatic potential and is considered one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer in dogs [13]. The canine disease shares clinical, histological and molecular characteristics with human melanoma [14]. Prognosis is poorer when lesions are located on the mouth or toes; the 1-year survival rate in these instances is only 10%, even when surgery and chemotherapy are performed [13, 15]. The factors involved in genesis of canine melanoma are still controversial [16]. No study has investigated the expression of epidermal growth factor receptors in canine melanoma.

Studies performed with experimental murine melanoma models found that cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits EGFR activity, reduces tumor invasion and suppresses metastasis formation [11, 17]. However, there are no descriptions of this treatment in dogs.

Due to the high aggressiveness of canine melanoma and the scarcity of information of association with epidermal growth factor receptors and canine melanoma progression, the aims of the present study were to characterize the expression of EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 in skin and oral canine melanoma and to determine their relationship with the histopathological characteristics and proliferative indices of these tumors.

Results

Histological characteristics

We analyzed 76 cases diagnosed as melanoma. During the pigmentation evaluation 16 received score 0 (amelanotic), 29 score 1, 13 score 2 and 18 score 3. After excluding the pigmentation cases 3, we obtained a total of 58 cases that were included in this study, of which 34% (20/58) were oral lesions and 66% (38/58) skin lesions.

In the oral samples, 90% (18/20) presented histologically as epithelioid and 10% (2/20) as fusiform. Ulcers were observed in 80% (16/20) and desmoplasia in 30% (6/20). Junctional activity was present in 59% (10/17; in 3 cases it was not possible to assess junctional activity due to extensive involvement of the epidermis by ulcers) and emboli in 50% (10/20).

In the cutaneous samples, 68% (26/38) presented histologically as epithelioid and 32% (12/38) as fusiform. Ulcers were observed in 39% (15/38) and desmoplasia in 47% (18/38). Junctional activity was present in 27% (10/37; in 1 case it was not possible to assess junctional activity due to extensive involvement of the epidermis by ulcers) and emboli in 50% (19/38).

Expression of epidermal growth factor receptors

EGFR expression (Fig. 1a and b) was detected in 25% of the oral and 53% of the skin tumors. Receptor overexpression (score 3) was identified in only 5 and 16% of lesions, respectively (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 1
figure1

EGFR and HER2 immunohistochemistry in canine melanoma. a) Membrane immunostaining 3+ for EGFR in cutaneous melanoma. b) Membrane immunostaining 3+ for EGFR in oral melanoma. c) Membrane immunostaining 2+ HER2 in cutaneous melanoma. d) Cytoplasmatic immunostaining moderate in more 30–60% of the neoplastic cells for HER2 in oral melanoma. Bar: 50 μm. Red arrows: immunostaining. Yellow arrows: Melanin

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Immunohistochemical expression of EGFR and HER2. a) Percentage distribution by EGFR expression score in oral and cutaneous melanomas. b) Percentage distribution by HER2 expression score in oral and cutaneous melanomas

Full size image

Membranous HER2 expression (Fig. 1c) was detected in 50% of the oral and 43% of the skin tumors; no cases received a score of 3 (Fig. 2 b). Cytoplasmic HER2 (Fig. 1d) expression was not detected in 30% of oral lesions and in 35% of skin lesions.

Membranous HER3 was not detected in any sample. Cytoplasmic expression (Fig. 3a) was observed in only 18% of the oral and 6% of the skin tumors (Fig. 4a); the mean percentage of labeled cells was 9 and 3% in the oral and skin tumors, respectively (Fig. 4b). Nuclear HER3 expression (Fig. 3b) was detected in 41% of the oral and 44% of the skin lesions (Fig. 4c); the average percentage of labeled cells was 26 and 17% in the oral and skin tumors, respectively (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 3
figure3

HER3 and HER4 immunohistochemistry in canine melanoma. a) Cytoplasmatic moderate (2+) immunostaining for HER3 in cutaneous melanoma. b) Nuclear moderate (2+) immunostaining for HER3 in oral melanoma. c) Membrane immunostaining moderate (2+) for HER4 in cutaneous melanoma. d) Nuclear and cytoplasmatic immunostaining weak (1+) for HER4 in oral melanoma. Bar: 50 μm. Red arrows: immunostaining. Yellow arrows: Melanin

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Immunohistochemical expression of HER3. a) Percentage distribution by HER3 cytoplasmatic expression score in oral and cutaneous melanomas. b) Mean percentage of cytoplasmic HER3 expression in neoplastic cells of oral and cutaneous canine melanomas. c) Percentage distribution by HER3 nuclear expression score in oral and cutaneous melanomas. d) Mean percentage of nuclear HER3 expression in neoplastic cells of oral and cutaneous canine melanomas

Full size image

Cytoplasmic HER4 expression (Fig. 3d) was weak (1+) in 42% of the oral and 38% of the skin tumors (Fig. 5a). Membranous expression (Fig. 3c) was observed in 21% of the oral and 68% of the skin lesions (Fig. 5b). Nuclear expression (Fig. 3d) was detected in only 16% of the oral and 11% of the skin neoplasms (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5
figure5

Immunohistochemical expression of HER4. Percentage distribution by HER4 score expression (a) cytoplasmatic; (b) membranar and (c) nuclear in oral and cutaneous canine melanomas

Full size image

Cell proliferation and epidermal growth factor receptor expression

The mean mitotic index was 4.71 ± 2.00 and 3.56 ± 2.87 for oral and skin melanomas, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the oral and skin melanomas, nor was there any association between the mitotic index and growth factor receptor labeling.

The Ki-67 expression was used to calculate a mean proliferative index of 22.06 ± 15.09 and 32.30 ± 18.18 for skin and oral melanomas, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the samples from each site.

In the skin samples, an increased proliferative index correlated with increased cytoplasmic HER4 (r: 0.4510; p: 0.0308) and reduced EGFR (r: − 0.4468; p: 0.0326) and nuclear HER3 (r: − 0.5465; p: 0.0070) expression. The proliferative index was lower in lesions with desmoplasia (r: − 0.4232; p: 0.0442). In the oral lesions, an increased proliferative index correlated with the epithelioid variant (r: 0.5698; p: 0.0421).

Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptors and histological characteristics

Higher EGFR expression correlated with decreased cytoplasmic HER2 expression (r: − 0.3357; p: 0.0422) in the skin melanomas. This association was not detected in oral tumors.

Membranous HER2 expression correlated with diagnoses of the epithelioid versus the fusiform variant (r: 0.3851; p: 0.0186) as well as increased nuclear HER3 expression (r: 0.3806; p: 0.0241) in skin lesions. In oral melanomas, membranous HER2 expression correlated with the occurrence of emboli (r: 0.4578; p: 0.0487) as well as cytoplasmic HER3 expression (r: 0.6720; p: 0.0031). In both tumor sites, there was a correlation between membranous HER2 and membranous HER4 expression (r: 0.4669; p: 0.0041, for the skin and r: 0.4885; p: 0.0338, for the oral tumors). Cytoplasmic HER2 expression was associated with lower cytoplasmic HER4 expression in oral melanomas (r: − 0.5291; p: 0.0198).

Cytoplasmic HER3 expression was associated with increased membranous HER4 expression in both skin (r: 0.3981; p: 0.0179) and oral (r: 0.5012; p: 0.0404) lesions. Additionally, cytoplasmic HER4 expression was associated with the epithelioid variant (r: 0.4235; p: 0.0090) and desmoplasia (r: 0.4958; p: 0.0018) in skin tumors and with the epithelioid variant in oral lesions (r: − 0.4643, p: 0.0452).

ERBB2 gene amplification

CISH (Chromogenic in situ hybridization) was performed on four oral (one with HER2 immunohistochemical expression) and nine skin (five with HER2 immunohistochemical expression) melanomas. All of the tested samples exhibited up to four gene copies (nuclear spots) and thus were classified as having normal gene expression (Fig. 6 a and b).

Fig. 6
figure6

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) for ERBB2 in canine melanoma. a) Cutaneous canine melanoma with normal expression (2–4 copies per cell) for ERBB2. b) Oral canine melanoma with normal expression (2–4 copies per cell) for ERBB2. c) Human mammary cancer cell line (positive control) with large clusters of ERBB2 in cancer cell nuclei. Arrows: Presence of chromogen. Arrow Head: melanin

Full size image

Discussion

As with human melanoma, canine melanoma often exhibits poor response to conventional chemotherapeutic agents [15] as well as reduced survival and high metastasis rates, especially for oral lesions [13]. In this paper we report for the first time, as far as we know, the expression of EGFR, HER2, HER3, and HER4 in canine melanomas.

Due the highest number of pigmented cells, samples that receive score 3 for pigmentation were not included in this study. Because it is a melanocytic neoplasm, it is well known that amelanotic melanomas represent less differentiated neoplasms. However, amelanotic melanomas do not necessarily represent a worse prognosis, since the association between pigmented tumors and survival is controversial. Some authors described an association between longer survival and pigmented tumors for both oral and skin [18, 19], but others described there is no significant association between the absence of pigments and shorter survival [20].

In our samples, the proliferative index was correlated with growth factor receptors expression. In melanomas, Ki67 is a better prognostic marker than the mitotic index and had a significant impact of prognosis by multivariate analyses [21]. This correlation was not observed with mitotic index, probably because during mitosis the signaling of growth factor receptors is altered due to the changes of the endocytosis process, which is slower than usual [22]. Besides that, the stimuli of growth factors are only necessary in the earlier stages of cell cycle progression [23].

Our data demonstrate a relationship between increased cytoplasmic HER4 expression and a high proliferative index in skin melanoma. HER4 is a receptor consisting of a ligand-binding ectodomain, a transmembrane, juxtamembrane and cytoplasmatic tyrosine kinase regions [24]. At least 2 isoforms are described for the juxtamembrane domain (JMa and JMb) [25] and cytoplasmatic domain (CYT-1 and CYT-2) [26]. The HER4 proteolytic processing, induced by binding of growth factors such as neuregulin (NRG) and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), involves a cleavage event, mediated for metalloproteinase tumor necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme (TACE or ADAM17), in JMa isoform [27], and a subsequent cleavage, mediated for presenilin, resulting in the releases into the cytosol, and posterior translocation for the nuclei or accumulation within mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, of the cytosolic HER4 fragment [28,29,30]. The cytoplasmic domain of HER4 can interact with PI3K/AKT pathway, which leads to cell proliferation [31]. The presence of cytoplasmic HER4 that we observe can be an indicative of cleavage and accumulation of cytosolic HER4 fragment, which could promote cell proliferation stimulation pathways, justifying the association found between HER4 cytoplasmic expression and proliferative index.

The cytoplasmic HER4 isoform was associated with poorer prognosis when detected in the lymph nodes of human patients with metastatic melanoma [32]. With regards to primary tumors, Zhu et al. (2018) recently demonstrated cytoplasmic HER4 expression in sinonasal mucosal melanoma and showed that it is an independent marker of poorer prognosis [33]. Mutations in the ERBB4 gene—which encodes HER4—were associated with oncogenic gain-of-function effects in human melanoma [8]. We found a direct relationship between membranous HER4 expression and both membranous HER2 and cytoplasmic HER3 expression. Associations between epidermal growth factor receptors, which facilitate heterodimerization, are important for tyrosine kinase activity amplification and/or reconstitution and for ligand affinity [34]. As a result, cytoplasmic HER4 expression in canine melanoma is associated with parameters of poorer prognosis, such as a high proliferative index.

HER3 expression was mainly observed in the nuclei of neoplastic cells and was negatively correlated with the proliferative index in skin melanomas. Membranous HER3 expression—which was not detected in the present study—was found to be a marker of poorer prognosis in in vitro and in vivo studies of human melanoma [7]. Conversely, nuclear HER3 expression is considered an indicator of good prognosis, since it has been associated with longer survival in human melanoma [35]. These findings corroborate our results, which demonstrate a correlation between nuclei expression and reduction of the proliferative index. However, although nuclear HER3 expression was associated with better prognosis, some evidence indicates that the translocation of this receptor into the nucleus is the result of a mechanism related to EGFR inhibitor resistance [36]. Some authors have found that HER3 nuclear translocation exclusively occurs in cells that co-express other epidermal growth factor receptors [37]. Therefore, while nuclear HER3 expression seems to be an indicator of good prognosis in both canine and human melanoma, its translocation is probably not an indicator of cellular resistance but of co-expression of other epidermal growth factor receptors.

We further identified a correlation between nuclear and cytoplasmic HER3 and membranous HER2 expression. HER3 is the only epidermal growth factor receptor family member considered to be an inactive pseudo-kinase, as it lacks a functional tyrosine kinase activity domain. For this reason, heterodimer formation is necessary for this receptor to become functional [38]. This phenomenon explains the relationship found between HER2 and HER3 in the analyzed model. It also indicates that the HER2-HER3 interaction might facilitate HER3 activation as well as cell differentiation in canine melanoma, as this receptor does not appear to be related to the stimulation of proliferation in the present study.

Membranous HER2 overexpression and ERBB2 gene amplification did not occur in any of the samples analyzed in the present study. Nevertheless, the score of membranous expression was associated with the occurrence of emboli in oral tumors. Three different models of melanoma dissemination, where in all of them the participation of emboli occurs, are found in the literature [39]. 1) sequential model, melanoma spreads first to the sentinel lymph node, via lymphatic system, and then to the distant sites, via the bloodstream [40]; 2) simultaneous model, dissemination via lymphatic system and the bloodstream occurs at the same time [41]; and 3) differential metastasis model, the ability to metastasize is variable among melanomas. Some tumors have the ability to disseminate by both pathways (lymphatic and bloodstream), while some metastasize for only one of them [42, 43]. In canine melanomas, Milanta et al., has shown that the presence of emboli is associated with reduced survival [44].

HER2 activation leads to increased expression and stability of kinase Src, which plays an important role in regulating of migration and invasion [45]. Src can promote the expression of metalloproteinases (MMP’s) 2, 7 and 9, contributing to the degradation of extracellular matrix [46,47,48], besides compromising cell-cell adhesion by phosphorylating the E-cadherin/B-catenin complex leading to loss cell adhesion which stimulates the expression of transcription factors inducing epithelium-mesenchyme transition, thus favoring the invasion and formation of metastases [49, 50]. The results of studies investigating HER2 expression in human melanoma are controversial. Similar to our findings, Shayanfar et al., 2015 [51] and Kluger et al., 2004 [52] did not detect membranous overexpression or gene amplification. These findings suggest that HER2 is not useful as a prognostic biomarker in melanoma. Similar results were also described in a study published by Potti et al., who observed membranous HER2 overexpression in only 0.9% of the analyzed samples [53]. Conversely, Bodey et al. did identify HER2 overexpression in human melanoma [54]. One limiting factor for HER2 studies in human melanoma is the small number of cases. While our data are partially similar to reports in the literature indicating that HER2 has no prognostic value, they also indicate a relationship with embolus occurrence and thus with neoplastic progression.

Membranous EGFR overexpression was detected in a few cases, and the presence of this receptor was associated with a reduced proliferative index in skin lesions. This finding contradicts observations made in human melanoma, where EGFR participates in the stimulation of melanocyte proliferation [55] and is associated with poorer prognosis [17]. Thus, in canine melanoma, EGFR might be associated with other functions, such as cell differentiation and autophagy [56, 57].

Conclusion

This is the first time HER2, HER3, Her4, and EGFR are reported in canine melanoma. In summary, we identified a relationship between the proliferative index and both increased cytoplasmic HER4 expression and reduced EGFR and HER3 expression in skin melanomas. Moreover, we established a relationship between membranous HER2 expression and the occurrence of emboli, even in the absence of ERBB2 gene amplification. Therefore, we conclude that among the epidermal growth factor receptors HER4 and HER2 are probably those associated with canine melanoma progression, HER4 being associated with proliferation stimulating pathways and HER2 associated with invasion stimulating pathways.

Methods

Ethical issues

The present study complied with the ethical principles for animal experimentation and was approved by the animal ethics committee (Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais–CETEA/CEUA) of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais–UFMG) (ruling no. 008/2016).

Specimens selection and Histopathological evaluation

Were analyzed cases of melanoma in dogs of different breeds, obtained from the collection of Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, UFMG. The samples were sent to the Laboratory of Comparative Pathology for histopathological diagnosis after surgical resection at the Veterinary Hospital of UFMG and at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavras. The samples used in this study were collected between 2005 and 2017 and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and following a 24-h fixation the specimens were subjected to macroscopic evaluation, sectioned and processed using the same routine paraffin embedding technique, stained with hematoxylin-eosin for analysis under a light microscope and histological classification (epithelioid or fusiform) according to the World Health Organization system [58].

All analyses were performed under a conventional light microscope Olympus–BX41 at 40x magnification - high-power field - (HPF). The tumors were qualitatively classified based on their pigmentation according to a 0-to-3 scoring system as follows: absence of pigmented neoplastic cells (0); 1–25% of pigmented neoplastic cells (1); 26–50% of pigmented neoplastic cells (2); and ≥ 51% of pigmented neoplastic cells (3). Tumors that received a score of 3 were not included in the present study due to difficulties in visualizing cytoplasmic immunohistochemical staining. Tumors with a score of 0 were categorized as amelanotic and tumors with a score of 1 or 2 were categorized as melanotic. Other prognostic factors assessed included the presence of emboli, ulceration, desmoplasia and junctional activity (lentiginous or pagetoid spread), classified as 0 (absence) or 1 (presence), and mitotic index, calculated as the mean number of cells undergoing mitosis in 10 HPF. A high mitotic index was defined as ≥4 for oral lesions and ≥ 3 for skin lesions, based on [59].

Immunohistochemistry for Anti-Melan-A and anti-Melanoma antigen (PNL-2) antibodies were used to confirm the diagnosis of melanoma in all analyzed samples, and the entire slide was analyzed. Immunohistochemical analysis for Melan-A was performed in all samples, and for Melanoma Antigen was performed for all amelanotic tumors, as well as for melanotic tumors that did not exhibit Melan-A labeling. Positive cases were defined as those with cytoplasmic labeling in more than 10% of the neoplastic cells [59].

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining was performed, by manual technique and all samples for each antibody were performed at the same time, according to the peroxidase reaction method with a polymerized secondary antibody (Advance™ HRP; Dako North America; Via Real Carpinteria, CA, USA or Novolink Polymer Detection System; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK or Histofine® Simple Stain MAX PO (MULTI), Nicherei Fresh Inc., Chun, Tokyo, Japan) for identification. Antigen retrieval was performed by means of humid heat (water bath at 98 °C) or pressurized humid heat at 125 °C (Pascal® Pressure Cooker; Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) with Target Retrieval Solution Citrate - pH 6.0 (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Only for EGFR immunodetection, the antigen retrieval method used was the enzymatic recovery in pepsin (400 mg dissolved in 99 ml H2O and 1 ml HCl 1 N) at 37 °C for 30 min. To block endogenous peroxidases, slides were incubated twice for 10 min in a 3% H2O2 solution in methyl alcohol. To block endogenous proteins, slides were incubated for 20 min with Protein Block Serum-Free Ready to Use (Dako North America; Via Real Carpinteria, CA, USA). Slides were incubated with primary antibodies for 30 min (anti-HER3) or 16 h (anti-EGFR, anti-HER2, anti-HER4, anti-Ki-67, anti-Melan-A and anti-Melanoma Antigen (PNL-2). Following a 1-min incubation with the chromogen 3′3-diaminobenzidine (Liquid DAB + Substrate Chromogen system; Dako North America, Via Real Carpinteria, CA, USA), the sections were counterstained with Giemsa stain (1:5) for 30 min and then rinsed with a hydrochloric acid solution (1:100), absolute alcohol and finally isopropyl alcohol for 1 min. Through this treatment and the subsequent counterstaining, the melanic pigment acquires a greenish hue that is different from the brownish hue of chromogen reaction with DAB/primary antibody. Table 1 lists the manufacturers, clones, dilutions and incubation times for all antibodies used.

Table 1 IHC protocol for EGFR, Her-2, Her-3, Her-4, Ki67, Melan-A, Melanoma antigen antibodies
Full size table

For the negative control, the primary antibody incubation step was omitted and replaced by incubation with immunoglobulins from the same species as the primary antibody was made. We also tested the replacement of the primary antibody with the antibody diluent used (Antibody Diluent with Background Reducing Components; Dako North America; Via Real Carpinteria, CA, USA).

Interpretation of Immunohistochemical findings

All histological assessments were performed under a conventional light microscope at 40x magnification (Olympus–BX41). For Anti-Melan-A and PNL-2 antigen positive cases were defined as those with cytoplasmic labeling in more than 10% of the neoplastic cells [59].

The anti-Ki-67 antibody was used to calculate the proliferative index of lesions based on the percentage of nuclear-labeled cells out of 500 counted cells at the area of hot spot (relatively dense concentration of positive cancer nuclei). A high proliferative index was defined as ≥19.5% for oral tumors [20] and ≥ 15% for skin tumors [19].

EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 immunohistochemical analysis was performed at the entire slide. EGFR and HER2 expression on the neoplastic cell membrane was categorized according to the following scoring system (Additional file 1: Fig. S1): (0) very weak incomplete membrane labeling in less than 10% of cells; (1+) very weak incomplete labeling in more than 10% of cells; (2+) weak or moderate incomplete membrane labeling in more than 10% of cells or strong complete labeling in less than 10% of cells; (3+) strong complete membrane labeling in more than 10% of cells (adapted from the Wolff et al., 2013 [60]). We further analyzed cytoplasmic HER2 expression; the results were categorized as a function of the percentage of immunolabeled cells: (0) no labeling; (1+) cytoplasmic labeling in less than 10% of neoplastic cells; (2+) cytoplasmic labeling in 10 to 30% of neoplastic cells; (3+) cytoplasmic labeling in 30–60% of neoplastic cells; and (4+) cytoplasmic labeling in more than 60% of neoplastic cells.

Nuclear, cytoplasmic and membranous HER3 expression was separately investigated in neoplastic cells and categorized according to the following scoring system: (0) no labeling; (1+) weak; (2+) moderate; and (3+) strong, based on the labeling intensity of at least 30% of cells [61]. In addition, we estimated the percentage of labeled cells in a semiquantitative manner.

Nuclear, cytoplasmic and membranous HER4 expression was separately investigated in neoplastic cells and categorized according to the following scoring system: (0) no labeling; (1+) weak; (2+) moderate; and (3+) strong, based on the labeling intensity of at least 10% of cells [62].

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH)

CISH was performed to investigate the number of chromosome 9 and ERBB2 gene copies using the CISH SPOT–Light Chromogenic ISH detection kit (Invitrogen Corporation, Camarillo, CA, USA). 4 μm histological sections of the selected lesions, that is positive for HER2 expression in immunohistochemistry, were hydrated and pretreated according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Next, the slides were incubated with a HER2 DNA probe (SPOT-Light HER2 Probe) in a Dako Hybridizer for 5 min at 90 °C and 10 h (overnight) at 37 °C. The hybridized probe was detected using the CISH Polymer Detection Kit II, and the tissues were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 10 s. Previously tested human breast samples were used as positive controls. The performance of the CISH was performed according to the manufacturer’s criteria and previous standardizations of our group [63].

Analysis and interpretation of the hybridization results were performed based on the recommendations supplied by the kit manufacturer. For hybridization analyses, 30 neoplastic cells were counted under a light microscope at 40x magnification. Absence of amplification was defined as 1 to 4 gene copies per nucleus in more than 50% of neoplastic cells; low amplification was defined as 5–10 copies or the presence of small clusters in each nucleus in more than 50% of neoplastic cells; and high amplification was defined as more than 10 copies or large clusters in each nucleus in more than 50% of neoplastic cells. Clusters corresponding to the presence of the gene are restricted to the nucleus, with well-defined staining, whereas pigmentation is observed in the cytoplasm, with granular and intense staining. CISH was performed in 13 samples, four oral melanomas (one with HER2 immunohistochemical expression) and nine cutaneous melanomas (five with HER2 immunohistochemical expression).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism v. 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Relationships between variables were investigated with the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Possible correlations were evaluated using a Spearman’s or Pearson’s test. For quantitative results, means were compared using a t-test or the Mann-Whitney test depending on the normality of data distribution. The significance level for associations and correlations was set to p ≤ 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CISH:

(Chromogenic in situ hybridization)

EGF:

(Epidermal growth factor)

HPF:

(High-power field)

References

  1. 1.

    Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/35052073.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fry WHD, Kotelawala L, Sweeney C, Carraway KL. Mechanisms of ErbB receptor negative regulation and relevance in cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marmor MD, Skaria KB, Yarden Y. Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:903–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.06.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Scaltriti M, Baselga J. The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway: a model for targeted therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5268–72. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1554.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(Suppl 4):S9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00231-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rákosy Z, Vízkeleti L, Ecsedi S, Vokó Z, Bégány A, Barok M, et al. EGFR gene copy number alterations in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas are associated with poor prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1729–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22928.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Reschke M, Mihic-Probst D, van der Horst EH, Knyazev P, Wild PJ, Hutterer M, et al. HER3 is a determinant for poor prognosis in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5188–97. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0186.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Prickett TD, Agrawal NS, Wei X, Yates KE, Lin JC, Wunderlich JR, et al. Analysis of the tyrosine kinome in melanoma reveals recurrent mutations in ERBB4. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1127–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.438.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Hamm H, Bröcker EB, Pinkel D. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2170–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20518.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Udart M, Utikal J, Krähn GM, Peter RU. Chromosome 7 aneusomy. A marker for metastatic melanoma? Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and chromosome 7 aneusomy in nevi, primary malignant melanomas and metastases. Neoplasia. 2001;3:245–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/neo/7900156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Naramura M, Gillies SD, Mendelsohn J, Reisfeld RA, Mueller BM. Therapeutic potential of chimeric and murine anti-(epidermal growth factor receptor) antibodies in a metastasis model for human melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1993;37:343–9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8402738.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tworkoski K, Singhal G, Szpakowski S, Zito CI, Bacchiocchi A, Muthusamy V, et al. Phosphoproteomic screen identifies potential therapeutic targets in melanoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:801–12. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0512.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gross TL, Ihrke PJ, Walder EJ, Affolter V k. Clinical and Histopatological Diagnosis. In: Skin Diseases of the Dog and Cat. 2005. p. 406–10.

  14. 14.

    Simpson RM, Bastian BC, Michael HT, Webster JD, Prasad ML, Conway CM, et al. Sporadic naturally occurring melanoma in dogs as a preclinical model for human melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12185.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Brockley L, Cooper M, Bennett P. Malignant melanoma in 63 dogs (2001–2011): the effect of carboplatin chemotherapy on survival. N Z Vet J. 2013;61:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2012.699433.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Modiano JF, Ritt MG, Wojcieszyn J. The molecular basis of canine melanoma: pathogenesis and trends in diagnosis and therapy. J Vet Intern Med. 1999;13:163–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1999.tb02173.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Boone B, Jacobs K, Ferdinande L, Taildeman J, Lambert J, Peeters M, et al. EGFR in melanoma: clinical significance and potential therapeutic target. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01673.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Esplin DG. Survival of dogs following surgical excision of histologically well-differentiated melanocytic neoplasms of the mucous membranes of the lips and Oral cavity. Vet Pathol. 2008;45:889–96. https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.45-6-889.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Laprie C, Abadie J, Amardeilh M-F, Net J-LLE, Lagadic M, Delverdier M. MIB-1 immunoreactivity correlates with biologic behaviour in canine cutaneous melanoma. Vet Dermatol. 2001;12:139–47. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3164.2001.00236.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bergin IL, Smedley RC, Esplin DG, Spangler WL, Kiupel M. Prognostic evaluation of Ki67 threshold value in canine Oral melanoma. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985810388947.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ladstein RG, Bachmann IM, Straume O, Akslen LA. Ki-67 expression is superior to mitotic count and novel proliferation markers PHH3, MCM4 and mitosin as a prognostic factor in thick cutaneous melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu L, Shi H, Chen X, Wang Z. Regulation of EGF-stimulated EGF receptor endocytosis during M phase. Traffic. 2011;12:201–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jones SM, Kazlauskas A. Growth-factor-dependent mitogenesis requires two distinct phases of signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:165–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Plowman GD, Culouscou JM, Whitney GS, Green JM, Carlton GW, Foy L, et al. Ligand-specific activation of HER4/p180erbB4, a fourth member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1993;90:1746–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.5.1746.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Elenius K, Corfas G, Paul S, Choi CJ, Rio C, Plowman GD, et al. A novel juxtamembrane domain isoform of HER4/ErbB4. Isoform-specific tissue distribution and differential processing in response to phorbol ester. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26761–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elenius K, Choi CJ, Paul S, Santiestevan E, Nishi E, Klagsbrun M. Characterization of a naturally occurring ErbB4 isoform that does not bind or activate phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase. Oncogene. 1999;18:2607–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202612.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rio C, Buxbaum JD, Peschon JJ, Corfas G. Tumor necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme is required for cleavage of erbB4/HER4. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:10379–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vidal GA, Naresh A, Marrero L, Jones FE. Presenilin-dependent γ-secretase processing regulates multiple ERBB4/HER4 activities. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19777–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lee HJ, Jung KM, Huang YZ, Bennett LB, Lee JS, Mei L, et al. Presenilin-dependent γ-secretase-like intramembrane cleavage of ErbB4. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6318–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ni CY, Murphy MP, Golde TE, Carpenter G. γ-secretase cleavage and nuclear locatization of ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase. Science. 2001;294:2179–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kainulainen V, Sundvall M, Määttä JA, Santiestevan E, Klagsbrun M, Elenius K. A natural ErbB4 isoform that does not activate phosphoinositide 3-kinase mediates proliferation but not survival or chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8641–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nielsen TO, Poulsen SS, Journe F, Ghanem G, Sorensen BS. HER4 and its cytoplasmic isoforms are associated with progression-free survival of malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2014;24:88–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000040.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhu W, Li S, Zou B, Liu H, Wang S. Expressions and clinical significance of HER4 and CD44 in sinonasal mucosal malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2018;28:105–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.000000000000042.

  34. 34.

    Sliwkowski MX, Schaefer G, Akita RW, Lofgren JA, Fitzpatrick VD, Nuijens A, et al. Coexpression of erbB2 and erbB3 proteins reconstitutes a high affinity receptor for Heregulin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:14661–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Trocmé E, Mougiakakos D, Johansson CC, All-Eriksson C, Economou MA, Larsson O, et al. Nuclear HER3 is associated with favorable overall survival in uveal melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:1120–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26118.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Brand TM, Iida M, Corrigan KL, Braverman CM, Coan JP, Flanigan BG, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase AXL mediates nuclear translocation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Sci Signal. 2017;10:eaag1064. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aag1064.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zscheppang K, Korenbaum E, Bueter W, Ramadurai SM, Nielsen HC, Dammann CEL. ErbB receptor dimerization, localization, and co-localization in mouse lung type II epithelial cells. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41:1205–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Linggi B, Carpenter G. ErbB receptors: new insights on mechanisms and biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:649–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.10.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Calomarde-Rees L, García-Calatayud R, Requena Caballero C, Manrique-Silva E, Traves V, García-Casado Z, et al. Risk factors for lymphatic and Hematogenous dissemination in patients with stages i to II cutaneous melanoma. JAMA Dermatology. 2019;155:679–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Morton DL, Hoon DSB, Cochran AJ, Turner RR, Essner R, Takeuchi H, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: therapeutic utility and implications of nodal microanatomy and molecular staging for improving the accuracy of detection of nodal micrometastases. Ann Surg. 2003;238:538–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Medalie N, Ackerman AB. Sentinel node biopsy has no benefit for patients whose primary cutaneous melanoma has metastasized to a lymph node and therefore should be abandoned now. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151:298–307.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Clark WH. Tumour progression and the nature of cancer. Br J Cancer. 1991;64:631–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Clark WH, Elder DE, Guerry D, Epstein MN, Greene MH, Van Horn M. A study of tumor progression: the precursor lesions of superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. Hum Pathol. 1984;15:1147–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(84)80310-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Millanta F, Fratini F, Corazza M, Castagnaro M, Zappulli V, Poli A. Proliferation activity in oral and cutaneous canine melanocytic tumours: correlation with histological parameters, location, and clinical behaviour. Res Vet Sci. 2002;73:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00041-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tan M, Li P, Klos KS, Lu J, Lan K-H, Nagata Y, et al. ErbB2 promotes Src synthesis and stability: novel mechanisms of Src activation that confer breast Cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1858–67. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2353.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    RIVAT C, LE FLOCH N, SABBAH M, TEYROL I, REDEUILH G, BRUYNEEL E, et al. Synergistic cooperation between the AP-1 and LEF-1 transcription factors in activation of the matrilysin promoter by the src oncogene: implications in cellular invasion. FASEB J. 2003;17:1721–3. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.03-0132fje.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Meng XN, Jin Y, Yu Y, Bai J, Liu GY, Zhu J, et al. Characterisation of fibronectin-mediated FAK signalling pathways in lung cancer cell migration and invasion. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:327–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Van Slambrouck S, Jenkins AR, Romero AE, Steelant WFA. Reorganization of the integrin alpha2 subunit controls cell adhesion and cancer cell invasion in prostate cancer. Int J Oncol. 2009;34:1717–26. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000302.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Boyer B, Bourgeois Y, Poupon MF. Src kinase contributes to the metastatic spread of carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:2347–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Guarino M, Rubino B, Ballabio G. The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer pathology. Pathology. 2007;39:305–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Shayanfar N, Bahari L, Safaie-Naraghi Z, Kamyab K, Gheytanchi E, Rezaei N. Negative HER2/neu amplification using immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization techniques in skin melanoma cases. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:421–5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.2.421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kluger HM, DiVito K, Berger AJ, Halaban R, Ariyan S, Camp RL, et al. Her2/neu is not a commonly expressed therapeutic target in melanoma - a large cohort tissue microarray study. Melanoma Res. 2004;14:207–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cmr.0000130874.33504.2f.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Potti A, Hille RC, Koch M. Immunohistochemical determination of HER-2/neu overexpression in malignant melanoma reveals no prognostic value, while c-kit (CD117) overexpression exhibits potential therapeutic implications. J Carcinog. 2003;2:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3163-2-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bodey B, Bodey B, Gröger AM, Luck JV, Siegel SE, Taylor CR, et al. Clinical and prognostic significance of the expression of the c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-3 oncoproteins in primary and metastatic malignant melanomas and breast carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:1319–30 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9137492.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Yun WJ, Bang SH, Min KH, Kim SW, Lee MW, Chang SE. Epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor signaling attenuate laser-induced melanogenesis. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1903–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12348.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sigismund S, Avanzato D, Lanzetti L. Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tan X, Lambert PF, Rapraeger AC, Anderson RA. Stress-induced EGFR trafficking: mechanisms, functions, and therapeutic implications. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:352–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Goldschmidt MH, Hendrick MJ. Tumors of the skin and soft tissues. In: Tumors in domestic animals. Ames: Iowa State Press; 2008. p. 45–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470376928.ch2.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Smedley RC, Lamoureux J, Sledge DG, Kiupel M. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of canine oral amelanotic melanocytic neoplasms. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985810387447.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/college ofAmerican pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3997–4013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kim JH, Im KS, Kim NH, Yhee JY, Nho WG, Sur JH. Expression of HER-2 and nuclear localization of HER-3 protein in canine mammary tumors: Histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Vet J. 2011;189:318–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hollmén M, Liu P, Kurppa K, Wildiers H, Reinvall I, Vandorpe T, et al. Proteolytic processing of ErbB4 in breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039413.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ferreira E, Bertagnolli AC, Gobbi H, Cassali GD. HER-2 gene expression in atypical ductal hyperplasia associated with canine mammary carcinomas. Arq Bras Med Vet e Zootec. 2014;66:609–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Veterinary Hospital of Federal University of Minas Gerais and Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Lavrasfor their support with animals case selection, and animals’ tutors involved in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Emerson Soares Veloso, Ivy Nayra Nascimento Gonçalves, Tatiany Luiza Silveira, Fernando Soares Oliveira, Déborah Soares Vieira, Geovanni Dantas Cassali, Helen Lima Del Puerto & Enio Ferreira

Authors
  1. Emerson Soares Veloso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivy Nayra Nascimento Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tatiany Luiza Silveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando Soares Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Déborah Soares Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geovanni Dantas Cassali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Helen Lima Del Puerto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Enio Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and study design: ESV, and EF; case selection: ESV, INNG., TLS, GDC and EF; sample processing and experiments: ESV, INNG, TLS, FSO and DSV; data analysis and interpretation: ESV and EF; wrote the manuscript: ESV, INNG, HLDP and EF. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enio Ferreira.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study complied with the ethical principles for animal experimentation and was approved by the animal ethics committee (Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais–CETEA/CEUA) of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais–UFMG) (ruling no. 008/2016).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

EGFR or HER2 immunohistochemistry in canine melanoma. A) Absence of membrane immunostaining for HER2 in cutaneous melanoma. B) Membrane immunostaining 1+ for HER2 in cutaneous melanoma. C) Membrane immunostaining 2+ for HER2 in cutaneous melanoma. D) Membrane immunostaining 3+ for EGFR in oral melanoma.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veloso, E.S., Gonçalves, I.N.N., Silveira, T.L. et al. Diverse roles of epidermal growth factors receptors in oral and cutaneous canine melanomas. BMC Vet Res 16, 24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-2249-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Melanoma
  • EGFR’s
  • Dog
  • Immunohistochemistry

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us