Skip to main content

Strategic supplementation of Flemingia silage to enhance rumen fermentation efficiency, microbial protein synthesis and methane mitigation in beef cattle

Abstract

Background

Good quality protein as an on-farm feed resource has been in great demand to support the productivity of ruminants. A digestion trial using beef cattle crossbreds was conducted to assess the four dietary treatments of Flemingia macrophylla silage (FMS) supplementation at 0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 kg dry matter (DM)/day in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Feed DM intakes were measured during the 14 days and sample of feeds, feces, urine, as well as rumen fluid and blood were collected during the 7 days while the animals were on metabolism crates.

Results

Based on this experiment strategic supplementation of FMS increased (P < 0.05) nutrients digestibility (organic matter, crude protein, and acid detergent fiber) enhanced rumen total volatile fatty acid production especially propionic acid (C3), C2:C3 ratio while, remarkably promoted the microbial protein synthesis (MPS) by increasing N-balance and retention of purine derivatives.

Conclusions

Under this experiment, the results revealed the potential use of FMS as a good-quality feed to improve nutrients digestibility, rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and to mitigate methane production. FMS supplementation at 0.6 kg DM/day exhibited the best result.

Background

Feed resources for ruminants are important in the livestock feeding systems for small-scale tropical farmers; particularly in the dry season [1]. Flemingia is a multipurpose legume shrub that yields fresh biomass of about 55 tons/ha/year and thrives well in diverse conditions [2]. It contains high levels of crude protein (17–26%), condensed tannins (CT) (6–11%) and saponins (SPN) [3,4,5]. The presence of these phytonutrients in feed resources has been shown to enhance the rumen fermentation efficiency and greatly reduce rumen methane (CH4) production [6]. Fagundes et al. [7] also reported that supplementation of Flemingia at 125 g of dry matter intake in goats did not affect adversely the feed intake and milk production. In addition [8], it was reported that supplemented Flemingia hay meal at 150 g/head/day increased digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis. Moreover, Kang et al. [4] confirmed that Flemingia leaves supplementation improved rumen fermentation and reduced the CH4 production. Conservation of feed in the form of silage has been a good practice especially for dry season feeding [9]. Silage quality can be enhanced by addition of urea and molasses in fodder crop silage [10,11,12].

However, there is limited information about the utilization of Flemingia macrophylla silage on rumen fermentation. Hence, the aim of this experiment was to investigate the impact of Flemingia macrophylla silage on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle.

Results

Nutritive value, feed intake and nutrient digestibility

Concentrate supplement was formulated using cassava chip and agricultural by-products, namely rice bran, palm kernel meal, molasses etc., as shown in Table 1. The nutritive values of the feeds were in good ranges especially the FMS which had a good characteristic of silage both physically and chemically.

Table 1 Feed ingredients and chemical composition of experimental diets

Strategic supplementation of FMS did not influence the total feed intake (P > 0.05), however nutrients digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF, and ADF were significantly increased (P < 0.001) (Table 2). In addition, the supplementation of FMS at 0.6 kg/head/day resulted in the highest in nutrients digestibilities.

Table 2 Effect of Flemingia macrophylla silage (FMS) on feed intake and nutrients digestibility

Rumen fermentation efficiency and blood urea nitrogen

FMS supplementation increased total VFA and propionic acid (C3) (P < 0.001), among treatments (Table 3). While the concentrations of NH3–N, acetic acid (C3), butyric acid (C4), acetic acid to propionic acid (C2 to C3), CH4 production, and protozoal population were decreased (P < 0.001) among treatments, respectively. However, ruminal pH and BUN were not changed.

Table 3 Effect of Flemingia macrophylla silage (FMS) on rumen ecology and fermentation

Nitrogen balance, excretion of purine derivatives and microbial nitrogen supply

Table 4, shows nitrogen intake ranged from 34.81 ± 1.23 to 48.01 ± 2.12 g/d and was increased (P < 0.001), while N excretion was similar among treatments (P > 0.05). However, N absorbed and N retained were increased (P < 0.001), respectively. The FMS supplementation affected on allantoin, uric acid, PD, purine absorb, microbial nitrogen supply and EMNS (P < 0.001). Moreover, FMS affected on percent of MNS and EMNS were increased significantly among treatments (P < 0.001), respectively.

Table 4 Effects of Flemingia macrophylla silage (FMS) on nitrogen balance, excretion of purine derivatives and microbial nitrogen supply

Discussion

Chemical composition of feed dry matter intake and digestibility of nutrients

As shown in Table 1, the nutritive value of rice straw obtained under this experiment had a low CP content and a high level of cell wall. These findings were similar to the values by Wanapat et al. [13]. Details of rice straw and the enhancement of nutritive value by various treatments had been illustrated by Wanapat et al. [14]. Flemingia is the shrub which can produce biomass for ruminant feeding. It contains high level of crude protein, CT and SP. The feed can be ensiled as silage for long time feeding, details are shown in Table 1, FMS contains 18.10% CP, 95.60% OM, 47.50% NDF, 37.20% ADF, and 10.20% CT, with pH of 4.4 and good characteristics. As reported by [15,16,17] who indicated that the pH of good silage should be 3.5 to 4.5. These results have shown that FMS was a good alternative feed to improve the quality and for a long dry season feeding. Providing additional source of energy such as molasses and urea as a non-protein nitrogen will lead to a higher CP content of the silage [18]. Feeding this silage with higher CP content would enrich the overall utilization especially when fed with low-quality roughages. Under this study, there were no differences in DM intakes among treatments (P < 0.05), but enhanced the digestibilities of OM, CP, NDF and ADF. Higher level of CP of the silage could have attributed the degradation activity of the rumen microbiomes. Phesatcha et al. [8] found similar results. It has been reported that CT in the feeds combined with protein to protect protein degradability in the rumen [19]. Tannin-protein feed complex would be available more in the lower-gut.

Rumen Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) and Blood-Urea-Nitrogen (BUN)

Ruminal pH and BUN were not significantly shifted differently among treatments. This result was similar to the findings of Phesatcha et al. [8] who reported Flemingia leaf supplementation did not change ruminal pH and BUN. The normal rumen pH was reported to be 6.3–6.8 which can support cellulolytic bacteria’s normal activity [20]. The tannin-protein complex in rumen could result in lower rumen NH3-N and enhance the protein availability in lower-gut [21, 22]. Ruminal NH3-N concentration was a key factor (15–30 mg/ml) for efficient microbial protein synthesis [23]. In this study, the ruminal NH3-N values (16.91 ± 0.08 to 19.31 ± 0.12 mg/ml) were found and could improve for rumen ecology in cattle crossbreds. With increased levels of FMS supplementation, the total VFA and C3 were remarkably increased (P < 0.05), and the highest impact was found in the group fed with of 0.6 kg/day, while C2, C2 to C3 ratio were reduced. Under the work of Phesatcha et al. [8], it was revealed that the ruminal C2 was reduced, which C3 was increased (P < 0.05). Makkar et al. [24] further showed that feeds containing condensed tannins (CT) could lower the ruminal C2 concentration. It was additionally reported that CT can impact on methanogenesis by reducing protozoa and methanogens, when C2 was reduced but C3 was greatly enhanced [25]. Another possible influence of rumen CH4 depression could be influenced by the suppression of protozoal population by FMS supplementation. This may be attributed to CT in FMS which could interfere the cell membrane of protozoa, thus interfering with ion exchanges [26]. Poungchompu et al. [27] earlier reported that dairy heifer crossbreds supplemented with feeds containing phytonutrients had reduced protozoal count. The population of rumen protozoal and methane emission were significantly reduced [28]. Earlier reports revealed that supplementation of plant secondary compounds, especially condensed tannins and saponins, could remarkably reduce protozoal population and methanogens in ruminants. However, the effect depended on dose-response of 1–2% of dry matter intake. Possible modes of action could be due to the direct effect of tannins on physical coating of protozoa whilst, saponins formed the sterol-biding with cell membrane of protozoa causing the destruction and blockage of ion-exchanges. Hence, such phenomenon caused the lysis of protozoa and methanogens [29,30,31]. However, in another study, it was shown that PTN could increase the population of Fibrobacter succinogenes, while the other two fibrolytic bacteria; Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens were decreased, but the actual mode of action needs to be further elucidated [32].

Nitrogen balance, excretion of purine derivatives and microbial protein synthesis

FMS supplementation affected N-balance as shown in Table 4. The N-absorbed and retention were linearly increased with FMS supplementation due to N-intake and CP digestibility, however N-excretion of fecal and urine were similar among treatments. Agreed with, Viennasay et al. [12] who showed that the N-balance was improve when the digestibility of CP was high. In addition, rumen tannin-protein complex can support more protein available in lower-gut [33]. As shown, microbial protein synthesis in the rumen was a good indicator for efficient protein synthesis to enhance the overall protein utilization by the host ruminants [34]. Ruminal NH3-N concentration has been shown to support the microbial protein synthesis, as it was well-utilized by cellulolytic bacteria as an important source of nitrogen [35]. In adequate doses, the efficiency in microbial synthesis and the microbial yield were increased by including saponins [36] or CT [37] in the diets. Under this study, supplementation of FMS containing both CT and SPN, could provide additional protein available at the lower-gut for the host ruminants, as well as enhancing rumen fermentation efficiency.

Conclusions

Under this experiment, the results revealed the potential use of Flemingia macrophylla silage as a good-quality feed to improve nutrients digestibility, rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and to mitigate methane production. Flemingia macrophylla silage supplementation at 0.6 kg DM/day exhibited the best result. Making Flemingia macrophylla silage should be encouraged to prepare for on-farm use especially during the long dry season. Furthermore, in vivo feeding trials should be conducted in both beef cattle and dairy cattle in order to obtain more relevant data.

Methods

This experiment approval was granted by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Khon Kaen University, Thailand (Record no. IACUC-KKU-94/61 and reference no. 0201.2. 11/73).

Preparation of Flemingia macrophylla silage

Flemingia macrophylla was planted by stems on the experimental plots of Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand with close supervision of the advisory Professor. All plant parts were kept and stored at TROFREC. Flemingia macrophylla (FM) whole top plant was harvested from the shrub after three months of regrowth. Silage of Flemingia was prepared by using young-whole leaf and stem, chopped (3 cm) and mixed with solution. Chopped fresh Flemingia (100 kg) was well-mixed with solution containing molasses, urea and water at 2:1:10, respectively. The mixture was ensiled in a plastic barrel for 21 days before feeding. Samples of FMS was randomly collected and later was analyzed for chemical compositions [38, 39], condensed tannins by methods [40, 41]. Apart from that, a FMS sample was washed with deionizing water for analyzed lactic acid and acetic acid analysis [42].

Sample size

The sample size calculation was based on experimental design according to in a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 4 replicates, which provided a total of 16 experimental units.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Neither inclusion nor exclusion was used, since the four beef cattle were similar in age, weight and pre-fed under similar feeding condition.

Blinding

No blinding was performed, as the four treatments were already randomized statistically.

Animals and design

These experimental beef crossbreds belonged to Tropical Feed Resource Research and Development center (TROFREC), Khon Kaen University and were provided as experimental animals for Ph.D. students. The animals were well-maintained for their health with good feeding and other management. After the experiment all animals were kept and maintained well with all aspects; health, nutrition, feeding and would be used later for other experiments. Four, beef cattle about two year old with 172 ± 43 kg liveweight, were randomly assigned to in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Concentrate was offered at 0.5 kg of body weight (BW)/day and rice straw offered ad libitum with supplementation of FMS at 0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 kg DM/head/day. The trial was conducted for four periods each was consisted of 21 days, during the first 14 days was for matter feed intake measurement, while during the last 7 days for sample collection using total collection method. Each animal was in individual pens, where clean water and mineral-salt blocks were available at all times. The diet was offered to the animals twice dairy in the morning (07:00a.m.) and afternoon (04.00p.m.). The liveweight of each cattle was weighed at the beginning and the end of each period to calculate feed intake. Feed provided and refusals were measured daily throughout the experimental period. Feed samples were collected twice a week for DM analysis. Samples of feeds including concentrate, FMS, rice straw, feces were collected randomly daily during the last 7 days of each period. A daily sample of feces of each animal (about 100 g) was collected to be analyses [38]. Urinary samples were collected and prepared for storage and later analyzed for total nitrogen [38], and total purine derivatives and calculation of microbial N supply (MNS) [43, 44]. Details of sampling procedures of rumen fluid from each animal analysis of volatile fatty acids (VFA) [42], protozoal population count [45], and estimated methane (CH4) production [46] are presented in details in Wanapat et al. [47]. Blood samples (about 10 ml) were collected from the jugular vein at each rumen sampling time and kept in the tubes to which 0.1 g EDTA was added for analysis of blood urea-nitrogen (BUN) [48].

Data management and statistical analysis

The samples were estimated according to the statistical design used 4 × 4 Latin Square Design.

All data were included in all analysis subjected to ANOVA according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design using the General Linear Models (GLM) procedures [49]. The results were presented as mean values with the standard error of the means. Difference among means with P < 0.05 was accepted as statistical differences while 0.05 < P < 0.10 was accepted as a tendency. Treatment means were statistically compared by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test [50].

Availability of data and materials

All experimental data are responsible and available under the holding of the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ADF:

Acid detergent fiber

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

BW:

Body weight

C:

Concentrate

CP:

Crude protein

C2 :

Acetate

C3 :

Propionate

C4 :

Butyrate

CP:

Condensed tannins

DM:

Dry matter

EMNS:

Efficiency of microbial nitrogen supply

FMS:

Flemingia macrophylla silage

NDF:

Neutral detergent fiber

NH3-N:

Ammonia-nitrogen

N:

Nitrogen

MNS:

Microbial nitrogen supply;

OM:

Organic matter

PD:

Purine derivatives

SP:

Saponins

VFA:

Volatile fatty acid

References

  1. 1.

    Wanapat M. The role of cassava hay as animal feed. DOA CIAT 504. 2002.

  2. 2.

    Binh DV, Tien NP, Mui NT. Study on biomass yield and quality of Flemingia macrophylla and on soil fertility. In Proc. Workshop Anim Nutr Sci. 1998;137.

  3. 3.

    Andersson MS, Lascano CE, Schultze-Kraft R, Peters M. Forage quality and tannin concentration and composition of a collection of the tropical shrub legume Flemingia macrophylla. J Sci Food Agric. 2006;86:1023–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tiemann TT, Lascano CE, Wettstein HR, Mayer AC, Kreuzer M, Hess HD. Effect of the tropical tannin-rich shrub legumes Calliandra calothyrsus and Flemingia macrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and energy balance in growing lambs. Anim. 2008;2:790–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kang S, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Norrapoke T, Foiklang S, Ampapon T, Phesatcha B. Using krabok (Irvingia malayana) seed oil and Flemingia macrophylla leaf meal as a rumen enhancer in an in vitro gas production system. Anim Prod Sci. 2017;57:327–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Williams CM, Eun JS, MacAdam JW, Young AJ, Fellner V, Min BR. Effects of forage legumes containing condensed tannins on methane and ammonia production in continuous cultures of mixed ruminal microorganisms. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011;166:364–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fagundes GM, Modesto EC, Fonseca CEM, Lima HRP, Muir JP. Intake, digestibility and milk yield in goats fed Flemingia macrophylla with or without polyethylene glycol. Small Ruminant Res. 2014;116:88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Phesatcha B, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Ampapon T, Kang S. Supplementation of Flemingia macrophylla and cassava foliage as a rumen enhancer on fermentation efficiency and estimated methane production in dairy steers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016;48:1449–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cheli F, Campagnoli A, Dell’Orto V. Fungal populations and mycotoxins in silages: From occurrence to analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;183:1–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Viennasay B, Phesatcha B, Ampapon T, Kang S. Strategic supplementation of cassava top silage to enhance rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy cows in the tropics. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018;50:1539–46.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Giang NTT, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Kang S. Level of Leucaena leucocephala silage feeding on intake, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016;48:1057–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Viennasay B, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Phesatcha B, Ampapon T. Replacement of rice straw with cassava-top silage on rumen ecology, fermentation and nutrient digestibilities in dairy steers. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59:906–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Boonnop K, Mapato C, Cherdthong A. Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows. Livest Sci. 2009;125:238–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wanapat M, Sundstøl F, Garmo TH. A comparison of alkali treatment methods to improve the nutritive value of straw. I. Digestibility and metabolizability. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1985;12:295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Carpintero CM, Henderson AR, McDonald P. The effect of some pre-treatments on proteolysis during the ensiling of herbage. Grass Forage Sci. 1979;34:311–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Man NV, Wiktorsson H. Effect of molasses on nutritional quality of cassava and gliricidia tops silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2002;15:1294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ali M, Cone JW, Van Duinkerken G, Klop A, Blok MC, Bruinenberg M, Khan NA, Hendriks WH. Variation between individual cows in in situ rumen degradation characteristics of maize and grass silages. NJAS-NJAS-Wagen J Life Sci. 2016;78:167–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Staples CR, Fahey GC Jr, Rindsig RB, Berger LL. Evaluation of dairy waste fiber as a roughage source for ruminants. J Dairy Sci. 1981;64:662–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wanapat M, Pilajun R, Polyorach S, Cherdthong A, Khejornsart P, Rowlinson P. Effect of carbohydrate source and cottonseed meal level in the concentrate on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013;26:952.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Calabrò S, Cutrignelli MI, Piccolo G, Bovera F, Zicarelli F, Gazaneo MP, Infascelli F. In vitro fermentation kinetics of fresh and dried silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2005;123:129–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hess HD, Mera ML, Tiemann TT, Lascano CE, Kreuzer M. In vitro assessment of the suitability of replacing the low-tannin legume Vigna unguiculata with the tanniniferous legumes Leucaena leucocephala, Flemingia macrophylla or Calliandra calothyrsus in a tropical grass diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2008;147:105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hassanat F, Benchaar C. Assessment of the effect of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:332–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wanapat M, Pimpa O. Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 1999;12:904–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Makkar HP, Becker K, Abel HJ, Szegletti C. Degradation of condensed tannins by rumen microbes exposed to quebracho tannins (QT) in rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) and effects of QT on fermentative processes in the RUSITEC. J Sci Food Agric. 1995;69:495–500.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dschaak CM, Williams CM, Holt MS, Eun JS, Young AJ, Min BR. Effects of supplementing condensed tannin extract on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2508–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Klita PT, Mathison GW, Fenton TW, Hardin RT. Effects of alfalfa root saponins on digestive function in sheep. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:1144–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Poungchompu O, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C, Wanapat S, Cherdthong A. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation and methane production by dietary saponins and tannins from mangosteen peel and soapberry fruit. Arch Anim Nutr. 2009;63:389–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91:24–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wallace RJ. Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:621–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hart KJ, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Duval SM, McEwan NR, Newbold CJ. Plant extracts to manipulate rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2008;147:8–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Naumann HD, Tedeschi LO, Zeller WE, Huntley NF. The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: advances, limitations and future directions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2017;46:929–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kim WY, Hanigan MD, Lee SJ, Lee SM, Kim DH, Hyun JH, Yeo JM, Lee SS. Effects of Cordyceps militaris on the growth of rumen microorganisms and in vitro rumen fermentation with respect to methane emissions. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:7065–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Giang NTT, Wanapat M, Phesatcha K, Kang S. Effect of inclusion of different levels of Leucaena silage on rumen microbial population and microbial protein synthesis in dairy steers fed on rice straw. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30:181.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stern MD, Bach A, Calsamiglia S. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:2256–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kernick BL. The effect of form of nitrogen on the efficiency of protein synthesis by rumen bacteria in continuous culture. 1991.

  36. 36.

    Hess HD, Monsalve LM, Lascano CE, Carulla JE, Diaz TE, Kreuzer M. Supplementation of a tropical grass diet with forage legumes and Sapindus saponaria fruits: effects on in vitro ruminal nitrogen turnover and methanogenesis. Austral J Agric Res. 2003;54:703–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Puchala R, Min BR, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T. The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. Gaithersburg: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Burns RE. Method for estimation of tannin in grain sorghum 1. Agron J. 1971;63:511–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wanapat M, Poungchompu O. Method for estimation of tannin by vanillin-HCl method (A modified method of Burns, 1971). Department of Animal Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 4002. 2001.

  42. 42.

    Samuel M, Sagathevan S, Thomas J, Mathen G. An Hplc Method for Estimation Of volatile Fatty Acids in Ruminal Fluid. Indian J Anim Sci. 1997;67:805–7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chen XB, Gomes MJ. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives-An over of the technical details. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Reseach Institute, Bucksburn Aberdee AB2 9SB, UK (1995).

  44. 44.

    Valadares RFD, Broderick GA, Valadares Filho SC, Clayton MK. Effect of replacing alfalfa silage with high moisture corn on ruminal protein synthesis estimated from excretion of total purine derivatives. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2686–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Galyean M. Laboratory procedure in animal nutrition research. Department of Animal and Life Science. New Mexico State University, USA 188. 1989.

  46. 46.

    Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annal Zootech. 2000;49:231–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wanapat M, Gunun P, Anantasook N, Kang S. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. J Agric Sci. 2014;152:675–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Crocker CL. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Amer J Med Technol. 1967;33:361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    SAS (Statistical Analysis System). User’s Guide: Statistic, Version 9.4th Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, (2013).

  50. 50.

    Steel RG, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach (No. Ed. 2). Ltd: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The technical support rendered by Animal Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Livestock Development-Thapra, Dairy Production Organization of Thailand, Northeast (DPO–NE), are greatly acknowledged.

Funding

This research was supported by Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University. Thailand Research Fund and International Research Network (TRF-IRN) TRF-IRN57W0002. KKU Scholarship for ASEAN and GMS Countries’ Personnel. The Funding donors did not have roles in the design of the study; research conduct, samples collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BV was the main researcher who conducted most of the research activities. BV and MW designed the experiments. BV conducted the animal experiments. BV performed the analyses. BV and MW wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and contributed to the manuscript. MW revised the final draft of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Metha Wanapat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiment was officially agreed and approved by the Khon Kaen University Committee of Animal Care and Use for Research. The experimental cattle were provided by our research farm (TROFREC, KKU).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viennasay, B., Wanapat, M. Strategic supplementation of Flemingia silage to enhance rumen fermentation efficiency, microbial protein synthesis and methane mitigation in beef cattle. BMC Vet Res 16, 480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02703-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fodder silage
  • Feed utilization
  • Rumen metabolism
  • Methane production
  • Phytonutrients
\