Skip to main content

Development and validation of the isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification assays for rapid detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in sheep

Abstract

Background

Mycoplasmal pneumonia is an important infectious disease that threatens sheep and goat production worldwide, and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae is one of major etiological agent causing mycoplasmal pneumonia. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique, and RPA-based diagnostic assays have been described for the detection of different types of pathogens.

Results

The RPA assays using real-time fluorescence detection (real-time RPA) and lateral flow strip detection (LFS RPA) were developed to detect M. ovipneumoniae targeting a conserved region of the 16S rRNA gene. Real-time RPA was performed in a portable florescence scanner at 39 °C for 20 min. LFS RPA was performed in a portable metal bath incubator at 39 °C for 15 min, and the amplicons were visualized with the naked eyes within 5 min on the lateral flow strip. Both assays were highly specific for M. ovipneumoniae, as there were no cross-reactions with other microorganisms tested, especially the pathogens involved in respiratory complex and other mycoplasmas frequently identified in ruminants. The limit of detection of LFS RPA assay was 1.0 × 101 copies per reaction using a recombinant plasmid containing target gene as template, which is 10 times lower than the limit of detection of the real-time RPA and real-time PCR assays. The RPA assays were further validated on 111 clinical sheep nasal swab and fresh lung samples, and M. ovipneumoniae DNA was detected in 29 samples in the real-time RPA, 31 samples in the LFS RPA and 32 samples in the real-time PCR assay. Compared to real-time PCR, the real-time RPA and LFS RPA showed diagnostic specificity of 100 and 98.73%, diagnostic sensitivity of 90.63 and 93.75%, and a kappa coefficient of 0.932 and 0.934, respectively.

Conclusions

The developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays provide the attractive and promising tools for rapid, convenient and reliable detection of M. ovipneumoniae in sheep, especially in resource-limited settings. However, the effectiveness of the developed RPA assays in the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in goats needs to be further validated.

Background

Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae is one of the major pathogens that cause mycoplasma pneumonia in sheep, goats, and wild ruminants [1,2,3,4,5]. M. ovipneumoniae-associated respiratory disease is characterized by cough, gasp, runny noses, progressive weight loss, pulmonary interstitial hyperplasia inflammation, and variable morbidity and mortality rates between flocks [6, 7]. Moreover, upon M. ovipneumoniae infection, sheep and goats become susceptible to other common pathogens causing respiratory disease, such as Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida and Parainfluenza-3 virus [8, 9]. Since first confirmed in Australia in 1972, infections by M. ovipneumoniae have been an endemic problem worldwide and have caused severe economic losses to the sheep and goat industry [10,11,12].

Bacteriological culture of M. ovipneumoniae is currently the gold standard for diagnosis, however, the culture is cumbersome and time-consuming due to the fastidious nature of the bacterium as well as that the follows required species identification by biochemical or serological tests, which make the assay burdensome for the routine applications [13,14,15]. In addition, the bacterial isolation may be hampered by sample contamination and prior antibiotic treatments received by the diseased animals. Serological tests, such as ELISA, indirect hemagglutination assay, are the common and economic methods for M. ovipneumoniae herd surveillance [12, 16]. However, seroconversion to M. ovipneumoniae is often delayed after natural infection, which makes the serology less effective in detecting early-stages of infection in herds, and unsuitable for detecting acute mycoplasmal pneumonia in the field [9, 14]. It is an urgent need to develop a rapid and accurate method to detect M. ovipneumoniae. Different nucleic acid amplification-based methods have been described to be sensitive and specific for M. ovipneumoniae, i.e. PCR, real-time PCR, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [9, 14, 15]. PCR assays require a well-equipped laboratory, expensive equipment and trained personnel, which limits their application in the under-equipped laboratories and the point-of-need (PON) diagnosis [9, 15]. Compared to the PCR assays, the isothermal amplification methods have advantages regarding convenience to perform and minimal equipment requirement. A LAMP assay for the detection of M. ovipneumoniae has been described for low requirement of experimental conditions, however, the assay requires 60 min to complete the reaction [14].

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), an isothermal DNA amplification technique, is rapid, reliable and considered to be a promising approach for PON diagnosis [17, 18]. RPA-based diagnostic assays have been described for the detection of different pathogens from different clinical samples [19, 20]. In this study, a real-time RPA assay using the exo probe and a LFS RPA assay using the nfo probe combined with lateral flow strip were developed for rapid, specific and sensitive detection of M. ovipneumoniae. The performance of the assays was further assessed by collecting and detecting the clinical sheep nasal swab and lung samples.

Results

Analytical specificity and sensitivity of the RPA assays

Only M. ovipneumoniae was amplified in both real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays (Fig. 1). The specificity analysis was repeated five times with similar results, which demonstrated the good repeatability of the RPA assays.

Fig. 1
figure1

Analytical Specificity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a, b) and LFS RPA (c, d) assays. Only the M. ovipneumoniae was amplified, but not other pathogens tested (n = 5). lane 1, M. ovipneumoniae; lane 2, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae; lane 3, M. mycoides subsp. capri; lane 4, M. arginini; lane 5, M. agalactiae; lane 6, P. multocida; lane 7, K. pneumoniae; lane 8, PPRV; lane 9, M. bovis; lane 10, M. flocculare; lane 11, M.bovoculi; lane 12, M.leachii; lane 13, M. capricolum subsp. capricolum; lane 14, M.dispar; lane 15, M. haemolytica

The limit of detection of LFS RPA assay was 1.0 × 101 copies M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA per reaction (Fig. 2a), while the LOD of real-time RPA was 1.0 × 102 copies per reaction (Fig. 2b), which was same as that of the real-time PCR (data not shown). The real-time RPA assay was further performed eight times on the standard DNA, and 1.0 × 107–1.0 × 102 copies DNA molecules were detected in 8/8 runs, 1.0 × 101 -1.0 × 100, 0/8, which demonstrated the good reproducibility (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Analytical Sensitivity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a) and LFS RPA (b) assays. The LOD of the real-time RPA was 1.0 × 102 copies per reaction of M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA, while the LOD of the LFS RPA was 1.0 × 101 copies per reaction. Lane 1, 1.0 × 107 copies; lane 2, 1.0 × 106 copies; lane 3, 1.0 × 105 copies; lane 4, 1.0 × 104 copies; lane 5, 1.0 × 103 copies; lane 6, 1.0 × 102 copies; lane 7, 1.0 × 101 copies; lane 8, 1.0 × 100 copies

Fig. 3
figure3

Reproducibility of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA assay. The analytical sensitivity was determined on DNA molecular standard (8 runs) for real-time RPA. Semi-logarithmic regression of the data collected from real-time RPA test runs on the DNA molecular standards using Prism Software. The run time of the real-time RPA was between 4 min–13 min for 1.0 × 107–1.0 × 102 copies M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA

Validation of the RPA assays on clinical samples

Of the 111 sheep clinical samples, M. ovipneumoniae DNA was detected in 29 (26.12%), 31 (27.93%) and 32 (28.83%) samples by the real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR, respectively (Table 1). Compared to the real-time PCR assay, the real-time RPA assay and LFS RPA assay showed diagnostic specificity (DSp) of 100 and 98.73%, diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) of 90.63 and 93.75%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100 and 96.77%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.34 and 97.5%, and kappa value of 0.932 and 0.934, respectively (Table 2). The real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays demonstrated the comparable performance in detecting the 111 sheep clinical samples. In the RPA assays, it took no more than 20 min to obtain the positive results, while it need approximately 32 min - 46 min in the real-time PCR with the Ct values ranging from 20.77 to 36.52.

Discussion

The developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays are highly specific and sensitive for detection of M. ovipneumoniae in the sheep clinical samples. Both RPA assays performed well at 39 °C within 20 min, which is faster than other common nucleic acid amplification methods. The real-time RPA assay and LFS RPA assay were performed on the tube scanner Genie III and a metal bath incubator, respectively. These two pieces of equipment are portable, lightweight, easily carried and can be charged by battery for working a whole day. For the RPA reagents, they are provided in the form of lyophilized powder and are independent of cold chains. Several studies also demonstrated that RPA was tolerant to most of the PCR inhibitors [19, 21]. The above characteristics make the developed RPA assays ideal for the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in field which is especially important for farms located in rural areas.

The PCR and LAMP assays targeted on the 16S rRNA gene, elongation factor TU gene or adhesin P113 gene had demonstrated their efficacy in the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in different clinical specimens, including the nasal swabs and lung samples [4, 9, 14, 15]. The RPA primers and probes were designed basing on the 16S rRNA gene of M. ovipneumoniae in this study. To ensure that the target sequences were unique to M. ovipneumoniae, we screened the selected primers and probes in silico using the pattern searching tool function from the EMBOSS package against the genomes of the common mycoplasmas causing infections in ruminants [22]. The complementary regions could not be found when allowing 1 or 5 sequence mismatches for the primer sequences. Furthermore, there was no mismatch in the reverse primers and probes in the M. ovipneumoniae strains available in Genbank, and only one mismatch in the forward primer in two strains: 2013–12,928-46 (Accession number: MN028079) and NCTC10151 (Accession number: LR215028.1). According to the above in silico analysis, the designed primers and probes fulfilled the specificity requirements of RPA [23]. In the specificity analysis, both the real-time RPA and LFS RPA only amplified the genomic DNA of M. ovipneumoniae, and no other mycoplasmas, bacteria and PPRV. Most importantly, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, the etiological agent of contagious caprine pleuropneumonia, was not amplified by the new developed RPA assays. Although the in silico sequence analysis support that all the M. ovipneumoniae strains are detectable, more genomic DNA of different strains of M. ovipneumoniae should be tested for further confirmation.

With the real-time PCR as the reference assay, the diagnostic performances of the developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays were evaluated. The performances of the RPA assays were comparable to the real-time PCR, while the RPA assays were faster to obtain the detection results. Furthermore, the developed real-time RPA was slightly weak in the detection of the clinical samples containing low amounts of M. ovipneumoniae DNA, as three nasal samples were negative in real-time RPA assay while positive in real-time PCR with Ct values of 36.49, 35.50 and 36.52. The above results are inspiring, but the RPA assays should be further validated on more clinical samples, especially those containing low amounts of M. ovipneumoniae DNA.

Conclusions

In this study, we describe the development of the real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays for the simple, rapid and reliable detection of M. ovipneumoniae from the sheep nasal and lung samples. The developed RPA assays could be performed in field conditions without the need of any expensive equipment, and could also become a routine test for rapid and direct detection of M. ovipneumoniae in the farm.

Methods

Bacteria, virus strains, clinical samples and DNA extraction

Genomic DNA of M. ovipneumoniae (Y98) and genomic DNA or cDNA of a panel of pathogens involved in respiratory complex and other mycoplasmas frequently identified in ruminant were maintained in our laboratory and used in the study, which were the following 6 mycoplasmas, 3 non-mycoplasma bacteria and 1 virus: M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae (F38), M. mycoides subsp. capri (PG3), M. arginini (G230), M. agalactiae (PG2), M. bovis (PG45), M. flocculare (HB-XS3), Mannheimia haemolytica (F120G3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (F21W3), Pasteurella multocida (F91G3) and Peste des petits ruminants virus (Nigeria 75/1 vaccine strain). Four artificial constructs, pUC57-Mbovoculi, pUC57-Mleachii, pUC57-Mcc and pUC57-Mdispar, were also used in the study. The constructs contain the full 16S rRNA gene of M.bovoculi (1531 bp), M.leachii (1524 bp), M. capricolum subsp. capricolum (1466 bp) and M.dispar (1475 bp), which were synthesized artificially by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) based on the reference sequences available in GenBank (Accession numbers: CP007154, NR_044773, NR_118796, NR_025182).

A total of 46 sheep clinical samples (30 nasal swabs and 16 fresh lungs) were collected in Baoding City, Hebei Province from October to November 2019. The nasal swabs were collected from the sheep with coughing symptom in Fangzhuang farm in Dingzhou County, Baoding City, and the sheep fresh lungs were obtained from Zhuanluzhen slaughter house in Tang County, Baoding City. The sheep nasal swabs and lung samples were treated and the total DNA was extracted as described previously [24]. Furthermore, 65 nucleic acid samples extracted from the clinically healthy sheep nasal swabs were kindly provided by Dr. Qingan Han from Hebei Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center. The 65 sheep nasal swabs were collected in October–December 2019, in which 35 samples were collected from one sheep farm in Tang Country, Baoding City and the other 30 samples were collected from one sheep farm in Pingquan County, Chengde City. All the samples were used for the daily sheep disease surveillance. The 65 nucleic acid samples were also quantified using a ND-2000c spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, USA) and used in the study.

Generation of standard DNA

To generate a M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA for the RPA assays, a PCR product containing 361 bp covering the region of interest of 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the M. ovipneumoniae DNA using LMF1 and LMR1 as primers (Table 3) and cloned into the pMD19-T (Takara, Dalian, China) for standards. The resulting plasmid, pMO-16SrRNA, was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells, purified with the SanPrep Plasmid MiniPrep Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and quantified. The copy number of DNA molecules was calculated by the following formula: amount (copies/μL) = [DNA concentration (g/μL)/ (plasmid length in base pairs× 660)] × 6.02 × 1023. Ten-fold dilutions of the pMO-16SrRNA, ranging from 1.0 × 107 to 1.0 × 100copies/μL, were prepared in nuclease-free water and aliquots of each dilution were stored at − 80 °C.

Table 1 Comparison of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for detection of clinical samples
Table 2 Diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, predictive value, and kappa value of real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for diagnosing M. ovipneumoniae infection
Table 3 Sequences of the primers and probes for M .ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and PCR assays

RPA primers and probe

The 16S rRNA gene of M. ovipneumoniae was determined as the amplification target for RPA. According to the reference sequences of M. ovipneumoniae (Accession numbers: NR_025989.1, LR215028.1, MN028361, MN028184, MN028079, MH133233), the highly conserved region in the 16S rRNA gene was identified, and the RPA primers, exo and nfo probes were designed following the RPA manufacturer guidelines (TwistDx. Cambridge, UK). Primers and probe are listed in Table 3 and synthesized by a commercial company (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

Real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays

The M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA assay was performed as described previously [24]. The total reaction volume was 50 μL including 40.9 μL of Buffer A (rehydration buffer), 2.0 μL of each RPA primers (MO-exo-F and MO-exo-R, 10 μmol/L), 0.6 μL of exo probe (MO-exo-P, 10 μmol/L) and 2.5 μL of Buffer B (magnesium acetate, 280 mmol/L). Furthermore, 1 μL of genomic DNA or recombinant plasmid was used for the specificity and sensitivity analysis, or 2 μL of sample DNA was used for the clinical sample diagnosis.

The M. ovipneumoniae LFS RPA assay was also performed as described previously [24]. The total reaction volume was 50 μL including 29.5 μL of rehydration buffer, 2.1 μL of each RPA primers (MO-nfo-F and MO-nfo-R, 10 μmol/L), 0.6 μL of exo probe (MO-nfo-P, 10 μmol/L) and 2.5 μL of magnesium acetate (280 mmol/L). In addition, 1 μL of bacterial genomic DNA or recombinant plasmid was used for the specific and sensitive analysis, or 2 μL of sample DNA was used for the clinical sample diagnosis. The assay was performed in a metal bath incubator at 39 °C for 15 min. Furthermore, the lateral flow strips (Milenia Biotec GmbH, Germany) were used to detect the RPA amplicons dual-labeled with FAM and biotin.

Analytical specificity and sensitivity analysis

Both RPA assays were performed to amplify the nucleic acids of a panel of microorganisms including M. ovipneumoniae, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, M. mycoides subsp. capricolum, M. arginini, M. agalactiae, M.bovoculi, M.leachii, M. capricolum subsp. capricolum, M.dispar, M. bovis, M. flocculare, M. haemolytica, P. multocida, K. pneumoniae, PPRV, which are considered to be dangerous to the sheep and goat respiratory system or frequently identified in the ruminants. The analytical specificity analysis was repeated five times.

The standard DNA of M. ovipneumoniae, ranging from 1.0 × 107 to 1.0 × 100 copies/μL, was used for the RPA analytical sensitivity analysis. One microliter of each dilution was amplified by both RPA assays to determine the limit of detection (LOD). The analytical sensitivity analysis was repeated five times. Furthermore, the real-time RPA was tested using the standard DNA in 8 replicates, the threshold time was plotted against the molecules detected and a semi-log regression was calculated using Prism software 5.0 (Graphpad Software Inc., SanDiego, California).

Validation with clinical samples

The RPA assays were validated with 95 sheep nasal swabs and 16 sheep fresh lungs. All samples tested with the two RPA assays were also tested by a real-time PCR in parallel. The real-time PCR for M. oviopneumoniae was performed on a ABI 7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), which was described previously [4].

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The nucleotide sequences under the relevant accession numbers (CP007154, NR_044773, NR_118796, NR_025182, NR_025989.1, LR215028.1, MN028361, MN028184, MN028079, MH133233, MN028079, LR215028.1) analysed during the current study are available in the GenBank repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/.

Abbreviations

CT:

Cycle threshold

DSp:

Diagnostic specificity

DSe:

Diagnostic sensitivity

ELISA:

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

K. pneumonia:

Klebsiella pneumoniae

LAMP:

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

LFS:

Lateral flow strip

M. agalactiae:

Mycoplasma agalactiae

M. arginini:

Mycoplasma arginini

M. bovis :

Mycoplasma bovis

M.bovoculi:

Mycoplasma bovoculi

M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae:

Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae

M.dispar:

Mycoplasma dispar

M. flocculare:

Mycoplasma flocculare

M. haemolytica:

Mannheimia haemolytica

M.leachii:

Mycoplasma leachii

M. mycoides subsp. capri:

Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri

M. ovipneumoniae:

Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

P. multocida :

Pasteurella multocida

PON:

Point-of-need

PPRV:

Peste des petits ruminants virus

PPV:

Positive predictive value

RPA:

Recombinase polymerase amplification

TT:

Threshold time

References

  1. 1.

    Alley MR, Ionas G, Clarke JK. Chronic non-progressive pneumonia of sheep in New Zealand - a review of the role of mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. N Z Vet J. 1999;47(5):155–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Highland MA, Herndon DR, Bender SC, Hansen L, Gerlach RF, Beckmen KB. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in wildlife species beyond subfamily Caprinae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(12):2384–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mohan K, Obwolo MJ, Hill FW. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection in Zimbabwean goats and sheep. J Comp Pathol. 1992;107(1):73–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Handeland K, Tengs T, Kokotovic B, Vikoren T, Ayling RD, Bergsjo B, Sigurethardottir OG, Bretten T. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae--a primary cause of severe pneumonia epizootics in the Norwegian muskox (Ovibos moschatus) population. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    DaMassa AJ, Wakenell PS, Brooks DL. Mycoplasmas of goats and sheep. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1992;4(1):101–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Besser TE, Cassirer EF, Potter KA, VanderSchalie J, Fischer A, Knowles DP, Herndon DR, Rurangirwa FR, Weiser GC, Srikumaran S. Association of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection with population-limiting respiratory disease in free-ranging Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis). J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(2):423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rifatbegovic M, Maksimovic Z, Hulaj B. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae associated with severe respiratory disease in goats. Vet Rec. 2011;168(21):565.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sheehan M, Cassidy JP, Brady J, Ball H, Doherty ML, Quinn PJ, Nicholas RA, Markey BK. An aetiopathological study of chronic bronchopneumonia in lambs in Ireland. Vet J. 2007;173(3):630–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    McAuliffe L, Hatchell FM, Ayling RD, King AI, Nicholas RA. Detection of mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in Pasteurella-vaccinated sheep flocks with respiratory disease in England. Vet Rec. 2003;153(22):687–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carmichael LE, St George TD, Sullivan ND, Horsfall N. Isolation, propagation, and characterization studies of an ovine mycoplasma responsible for proliferative interstitial pneumonia. Cornell Vet. 1972;62(4):654–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Giangaspero M, Nicholas RA, Hlusek M, Bonfini B, Osawa T, Orusa R, Tatami S, Takagi E, Moriya H, Okura N, et al. Seroepidemiological survey of sheep flocks from northern Japan for mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and mycoplasma agalactiae. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;44(3):395–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cheng C, Jun Q, Qingling M, Zhengxiang H, Yu M, Xuepeng C, Zibing C, Jinsheng Z, Zaichao Z, Kuojun C, et al. Serological and molecular survey of sheep infected with mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in Xinjiang, China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015;47(8):1641–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Weiser GC, Drew ML, Cassirer EF, Ward AC. Detection of mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and M. arginini in bighorn sheep using enrichment culture coupled with genus- and species-specific polymerase chain reaction. J Wildl Dis. 2012;48(2):449–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang J, Cao J, Zhu M, Xu M, Shi F. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral-flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) to detect mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35(2):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yang F, Dao X, Rodriguez-Palacios A, Feng X, Tang C, Yang X, Yue H. A real-time PCR for detection and quantification of mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76(12):1631–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rong G, Zhao JM, Hou GY, Zhou HL. Seroprevalence and molecular detection of mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in goats in tropical China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014;46(8):1491–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Piepenburg O, Williams CH, Stemple DL, Armes NA. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(7):e204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Amer HM, Abd El Wahed A, Shalaby MA, Almajhdi FN, Hufert FT, Weidmann M. A new approach for diagnosis of bovine coronavirus using a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay. J Virol Methods. 2013;193(2):337–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Daher RK, Stewart G, Boissinot M, Bergeron MG. Recombinase polymerase amplification for diagnostic applications. Clin Chem. 2016;62(7):947–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li J, Macdonald J, von Stetten F. Review: a comprehensive summary of a decade development of the recombinase polymerase amplification. Analyst. 2018;144(1):31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lillis L, Siverson J, Lee A, Cantera J, Parker M, Piepenburg O, Lehman DA, Boyle DS. Factors influencing Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assay outcomes at point of care. Mol Cell Probes. 2016;30(2):74–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):276–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Daher RK, Stewart G, Boissinot M, Boudreau DK, Bergeron MG. Influence of sequence mismatches on the specificity of recombinase polymerase amplification technology. Mol Cell Probes. 2015;29(2):116–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu L, Li R, Zhang R, Wang J, An Q, Han Q, Wang J, Yuan W. Rapid and sensitive detection of mycoplasma hyopneumoniae by recombinase polymerase amplification assay. J Microbiol Methods. 2019;159:56–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the laboratory staff in the animal hospital of Hebei Agricultural University. We also thank Dr. Qingan Han from the Hebei Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center for providing the 65 nucleic acid samples.

Funding

This work was supported by the Project for Key Common Technologies for High Quality Agricultural Development of Hebei Province (19226636D), and the Earmarked Fund for Hebei Sheep and Goat Innovation Team of Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (HBCT2018140204). The funding agencies had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JCW and WZY conceived and designed the study. JFW and RWL developed the real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays and analyzed the data. XXS, LBL and XPH performed the clinical samples testing, helped in the data analysis and manuscript revision. JCW and WZY wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianchang Wang or Wanzhe Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The sheep nasal swabs and sheep fresh lungs used in this study were collected in sheep husbandry farms and a slaughter house, respectively. The written consents for the use of the samples before participation in the study were obtained from the farmers and the slaughter house’s owner. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Ethics Committee of Hebei Agricultural University (approval no. IACECHEBAU20110509).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Li, R., Sun, X. et al. Development and validation of the isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification assays for rapid detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in sheep. BMC Vet Res 16, 172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02387-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae
  • 16S rRNA gene
  • Real-time RPA
  • Lateral flow strip
  • Isothermal amplification