Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptome profiling of porcine testis tissue reveals genes related to sperm hyperactive motility

BMC Veterinary Research volume 16, Article number: 161 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sperm hyperactive motility has previously been shown to influence litter size in pigs, but little is known about the underlying biological mechanisms. The aim of this study was to use RNA sequencing to investigate gene expression differences in testis tissue from Landrace and Duroc boars with high and low levels of sperm hyperactive motility. Boars with divergent phenotypes were selected based on their sperm hyperactivity values at the day of ejaculation (day 0) (contrasts (i) and (ii) for Landrace and Duroc, respectively) and on their change in hyperactivity between day 0 and after 96 h liquid storage at 18 °C (contrast (iii)).

Results

RNA sequencing was used to measure gene expression in testis. In Landrace boars, 3219 genes were differentially expressed for contrast (i), whereas 102 genes were differentially expressed for contrast (iii). Forty-one differentially expressed genes were identified in both contrasts, suggesting a functional role of these genes in hyperactivity regardless of storage. Zinc finger DNLZ was the most up-regulated gene in contrasts (i) and (iii), whereas the most significant differentially expressed gene for the two contrasts were ADP ribosylation factor ARFGAP1 and solute carrier SLC40A1, respectively. For Duroc (contrast (ii)), the clustering of boars based on their gene expression data did not reflect their difference in sperm hyperactivity phenotypes. No results were therefore obtained for this breed. A case-control analysis of variants identified in the Landrace RNA sequencing data showed that SNPs in NEU3, CHRDL2 and HMCN1 might be important for sperm hyperactivity.

Conclusions

Differentially expressed genes were identified in Landrace boars with high and low levels of sperm hyperactivity at the day of ejaculate collection and high and low change in hyperactivity after 96 h of sperm storage. The results point towards important candidate genes, biochemical pathways and sequence variants underlying sperm hyperactivity in pigs.

Background

The use of artificial insemination (AI) is crucial for efficient pig production and proper evaluation of semen quality is essential for high quality AI. Microscopic evaluation of ejaculates is a commonly used method but is subjective and not able to distinguish between subpopulations of spermatozoa with different motility characteristics [1]. Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) provides accurate and objective evaluations of many sperm characteristics such as motility, morphology and concentration [1], and has been used in several species to predict fertility outcome [2]. Ejaculated mammalian spermatozoa are not able to fertilize an oocyte before capacitation has occurred, a process where they acquire hyperactive motility and other modifications that facilitate fertilization [3]. The hyperactive motility is characterized by a vigorous and non-linear swimming pattern, which help the spermatozoa to penetrate the zona pellucida [4]. CASA recognizes the hyperactive motility pattern as high curvilinear velocity and amplitude of the lateral head movement and low linear trajectory [5]. Hyperactive swimming pattern varies between species, and for boar spermatozoa the CASA thresholds have been related to curvilinear velocity (VCL), lateral head displacement (ALH), linearity (LIN) and wobble (WOB) [5]. The change in swimming pattern towards hyperactivity has been shown to require calcium, increased pH and ATP production [4].

In our previous study, several parameters defining hyperactive motility was correlated to the total number of piglets born, and breed differences were found for sperm motility characteristics [6]. Whereas Landrace developed more hyperactivity during storage, Duroc showed a large portion of sperm cells with hyperactive swimming pattern already at the day of ejaculate collection and no significant increase after storage [6]. Due to factors such as long-distance shipment, the semen doses are often stored for 48 to 96 h before used for insemination. Differences in hyperactive motility between the day of semen collection and after storage is of interest. The sperm cells’ capability of obtaining and maintaining hyperactive motility is a prerequisite for fertilization and if this occurs too early, there is a risk that the sperm cells deplete their energy store and die before they reach the oocyte [3].

Previous studies on the genomics underlying sperm hyperactive motility have focused on a limited number of candidate genes. A family of CatSper (cation channel of sperm) genes has been associated with different sperm quality parameters, including hyperactive motility [reviewed by 7]. CatSpers are voltage-dependent, calcium ion selective and pH-sensitive ion channels that controls entry of calcium ions into sperm cells [7, 8]. Other candidate genes have been associated to sperm hyperactivation in other species, like a family of β-defensin genes in mouse [9]. A proteomic study of boar spermatozoa have identified several proteins important for capacitation, belonging to pathways such as tricarboxylic acid cycle, glutathione metabolism, adipocytokine signaling and insulin action [10].

Before the spermatozoa can acquire hyperactive motility and fertilize an oocyte, it must undergo several different processes within testes including production, maturation and ejaculation. In this study, we wanted to examine how gene expressions in testis are associated with hyperactivity in ejaculated spermatozoa, as production and maturation of spermatozoa takes place in testis. Testis tissue samples were therefore collected from Landrace and Duroc boars where spermatozoa had been examined for degree of hyperactivity at the day of ejaculation (day 0) and after 96 h storage. Samples with high and low sperm hyperactive motility at day 0 and high and low change in level of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage were then used for transcriptome sequencing and facilitated the identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways.

Results

Sperm hyperactive motility data

Transcriptome sequencing was performed to analyze gene expression in testis tissue from Landrace and Duroc boars with different levels of sperm hyperactive motility. Three different contrasts were prepared in this study: (i) high versus low hyperactivity at ejaculation (day 0) in Landrace, (ii) high versus low hyperactivity at ejaculation (day 0) in Duroc, and (iii) high versus low change in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace (Table 1). In Duroc, a large proportion of the sperm cells were already hyperactive at day 0, and there were not enough extreme animals to make a contrast after 96 h storage. The mean (±SD) hyperactivity values for the contrasts were 14.5% (±1.7) (n = 4) and 1.6% (±0.3) (n = 4) for contrast (i), 26.7% (±1.7) (n = 5) and 6.3% (±2.7) (n = 4) for contrast (ii), and 15.0% (±3.0) (n = 3) and 2.7% (±0.6) (n = 4) for contrast (iii), respectively.

Table 1 Sperm hyperactivity measurements for the different boars included in this study
Full size table

Testis transcriptome sequence data

The average number of 100 bp single reads generated by RNA sequencing across the samples was 98 million, ranging from 65 to 196 million (Table 1). Trimmomatic [11] removed between 0.38–0.7% of the reads, and 96.44% of the remaining high-quality reads were successfully mapped to the pig genome build 11.1 [12]. For the different contrasts, 82–83% of the 25,880 pig genes had at least one count in at least one of the samples and were included in the differential expression analysis. Normalization in edgeR adjusted for differences in sequencing depths as represented by differing library sizes.

Differential expression

Contrasts (i) and (iii) showed similarity in gene expression patterns when performing cluster analysis by multidimensional scaling (Fig. 1 A and B). Differentially expressed genes are displayed in heat maps (Fig. 2 A and B), showing similar trends for the high and low groups. Contrast (ii), on the other hand, did not cluster as expected based on sperm hyperactivity measurements as described above (Fig. 1C). No significant results could therefore be obtained from the Duroc contrast (ii).

Fig. 1
figure1

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots and Venn diagram for the gene expression data. a and b are MDS plots of contrasts (i) and (iii) in Landrace, respectively, whereas c is of contrast (ii) in Duroc. d shows the number of differentially expressed genes for contrast (i) and (iii) with their overlap

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Heatmap for hierarchical clustering of differential gene expression. Each row of the grid corresponds to a different gene and each column represents a sample. The up-regulated (red) and down-regulated (yellow) genes were distinguished between the high versus low sperm hyperactivity groups in a) contrast (i) high versus low hyperactivity at the day of ejaculation in Landrace and b) contrast (iii) high versus low change in levels hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace

Full size image

For contrast (i), high versus low hyperactivity on day 0 in Landrace, 3219 genes were found differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05) [see Additional file 1]. Of these, 870 genes were down-regulated in the high hyperactivity group whereas the rest were up-regulated. The most significant differentially expressed gene was ADP ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 1 (ARFGAP1) (FDR = 1.2e-05). The most up-regulated gene in the high hyperactivity group was DNL-type zinc finger (DNLZ) (logFC = 2.7), whereas the most down-regulated gene was novel gene ENSSSCG00000037477 (NCBI description: tetratricopeptide repeat protein 37-like; logFC = − 3.0).

For contrast (iii), high versus low change in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace, 102 genes were differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05) [see Additional file 2]. Of these, 33 genes were up-regulated in the high hyperactivity group whereas 69 were down-regulated, and the most significant gene was solute carrier family 40 member 1 (SLC40A1) (FDR = 9.7e-04). In the high hyperactivity group, the most up-regulated gene was the same as in contrast (i): DNLZ (logFC = 1.9), whereas the most down-regulated gene was calcium dependent secretion activator (CADPS) (logFC = − 2.0).

Between contrasts (i) and (iii), 41 differentially expressed genes were found in common (Fig. 1D and Table 2). The most significant common gene was DNLZ (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Differentially expressed genes in common for contrasts (i) high versus low hyperactivity at day 0 in Landrace and (iii) high versus low change in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure3

Boxplot showing the differential expression of DNLZ. The most significant gene in common for the Landrace contrasts (i) high versus low hyperactivity at the day of ejaculation in Landrace and (iii) high versus low change in levels hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace was DNLZ. The read counts for the high and low groups of animals in these two contrasts are plotted and box edges represents the upper and lower quartile with the median value shown as a bold line in the middle of the box. Whiskers represent 1.5 times the quartile of the data

Full size image

Gene ontology

Over-represented pathways among the differentially expressed genes were identified by gene ontology analysis. For contrast (i), 12 pathways were over-represented (Table 3), and the most significant pathways include the “extracellular exosome” (GO:0070062), “cytoplasm” (GO:0005737) and “in utero embryonic development” (GO:0001701). Furthermore, all genes belonging to the biological process pathway “establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradient” (GO:0010248) were differentially expressed: ATPase gene members ATP1A1, ATP1A2, ATP1B2, ATP4A and BCL2 associated X, apoptosis regulator (BAX). Eight of the nine genes in the cellular component “GATOR2 complex” (GO:0061700) were also differentially expressed: cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 (CASTOR1), meiosis regulator for oocyte development (MIOS), SEC13 homolog nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component (SEC13), sestrins SESN1 and SESN2, KICSTOR complex subunit (SZT2), and WD (tryptophan-aspartic acid dipeptide) repeat domains WDR24 and WDR59.

Table 3 Gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis for the differentially expressed genes for hyperactivity at day 0 in Landrace
Full size table

For contrast (iii), seven pathways were over-represented (Table 4), and the most significant pathways include the cellular component “extracellular space” (GO:0005615), “extracellular region” (GO:0005576) and “adenosine catabolic process” (GO:0006154). None of the overrepresented pathways in contrast (i) and (iii) were in common.

Table 4 Gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis for the differentially expressed genes for change in hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace
Full size table

Variant calling

SNP detection in the sequence data of the Landrace animals from contrasts (i) and (iii) identified 103,161 filtered, high-quality variants (Table 5 and Additional file 3). Of these variants, 75% had existing dbSNP entries. The importance of the detected SNPs was investigated by a case-control analysis and by localization in differentially expressed genes.

Table 5 Effects of putative SNPs
Full size table

In search of SNPs that may affect levels of hyperactivity, a case-control analysis was performed between the high and low groups within each contrast. Genotype frequencies of 278 and 19 variants were significantly different between the high and low groups of contrasts (i) and (iii), respectively (Additional file 4). None of these SNPs had a predicted high impact according to Ensembl variant effect predictor (VEP), however, for contrast (i), 18 SNPs had a predicted moderate or low impact, and for all these SNPs the alternate allele was only present in one of the animal groups (high or low sperm hyperactivity). Thirteen of these 18 SNPs were located in neuraminidase 3 (NEU3) and one of these, rs318364485, was predicted to be deleterious with a SIFT score of 0.05. Further, two of the 18 SNPs were located in chordin like 2 (CHRDL2) and hemicentin 1 (HMCN1), respectively.

Of the identified 103,161 filtered, high-quality variants, 16 SNPs located in differentially expressed genes of contrast (i) were predicted to have a high impact (Ensembl VEP) (Table 5 and Additional file 5). These 16 SNPs were located in 15 different genes: cilia and flagella associated protein 65 (CFAP65), peptidylprolyl isomerase G (PPIG), gametogenetin binding protein 2 (GGNBP2), protein arginine methyltransferase 2 (PRMT2), calcium binding protein 39 (CAB39), RuvB like AAA ATPase 1 (RUVBL1), coiled-coil domain containing 187 (CCDC187), NUT midline carcinoma family member 1 (NUTM1), Rap associating with DIL domain (RADIL), angiogenic factor with G-patch and FHA domains 1 (AGGF1), ribonucleoprotein PTB binding 1 (RAVER1), ribosomal protein S9 (RPS9) and three uncharacterized genes. Of the 16 high impact SNPs, six had existing rs-IDs, and of the ten remaining, eight could be verified in an independent whole-genome sequencing dataset from the same Landrace population [13]. The SNPs in CAB39 and AGGF1 could not be verified in this dataset. When the detected 103,161 filtered, high-quality variants were compared to the results of contrast (iii), no high impact SNPs were localized in the differentially expressed genes.

Discussion

Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to elucidate genes and pathways associated with sperm hyperactive motility in two pig breeds, Landrace and Duroc. Hyperactive motility of sperm cells is important for fertilization of an oocyte; however, if acquired too early, the sperm cells drain their energy and risk not reaching the oocyte. In this study, we therefore included two contrasts in Landrace: (i) high versus low levels of sperm hyperactivity at the day of ejaculation (day 0) and (iii) high versus low change in levels of sperm hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage. In Norway, porcine liquid diluted semen is recommended to be used within 96 h after collection, hence this storage limit of contrast (iii). We also tried to include a third contrast, day of ejaculation (day 0) in Duroc (ii), however, this was not successful and is discussed in the section “Breed differences” below. Generally, it is of interest to identify putative biomarkers for boar fertility and no studies in the past have looked at testis gene expression and how it is associated with sperm hyperactive motility. Each of the groups within the contrasts consisted of a limited set of animals (n = 3–5), which could affect our results by introducing spurious associations. Moreover, individual differences in seminal plasma content was not taken into account in the current study. Seminal plasma is reported to contain decapacitation factors and seems to inhibit the development of hyperactivated spermatozoa [14]. Further, proteins in seminal plasma have been reported to keep the spermatozoa progressively motile, viable and acrosome intact during storage [15]. This means that the results of both the contrast at the day of ejaculation and the contrast looking at difference in hyperactivity after storage could be affected by individual variation in seminal plasma content.

Genes important for hyperactivity regardless of storage

Of the 3219 differentially expressed genes in contrast (i) and the 102 differentially expressed genes in contrast (iii), 41 were in common, suggesting that these genes are important for sperm hyperactive motility both initially and after storage. The most up-regulated gene in the high hyperactivity group of both contrasts was DNLZ, suggesting an important function in sperm hyperactivity in Landrace. DNLZ, also known as HEP and HEP1, is a zinc finger protein that is known to be important for regulation of HSPA9 ATPase activity in human by enhancing the rate of ATP hydrolysis [16, 17]. HSPA9 seems to be implicated in the maturity and fertilizing ability of spermatozoa [18] and was also differentially expressed in a proteomic study for human sperm motility [19]. Whether an increased HSPA9 ATPase activity by DNLZ is the link to sperm hyperactive motility needs to be further investigated.

Adenosine deaminases ADA and ADA2 were differentially expressed in contrasts (i) and (iii), and the gene ontology term “adenosine catabolic process” was significant for contrast (iii). Previous studies have shown that adenosine enhances sperm capacitation and motility through ADA receptors [20,21,22]. This is interesting as capacitation is necessary for hyperactivation of sperm cells and could explain our results. Other genes in common for contrasts (i) and (iii) that have previously been associated to sperm motility are huntington interacting protein 1 gene (HIP1), protamines PRM1 and PRM3, transmembrane protein 225B (TMEM225B) and fascin-3 (FSCN3). CASA analysis of HIP1 knockout mice has previously shown reduced velocity, amplitude of lateral head displacement and numbers and percentages of motile, rapid and progressive sperm cells [23]. The study of Khatchadourian et al. [23] suggested that HIP1 was involved in sperm motility and morphology by stabilizing actin and microtubules. PRM1 and PRM3 are protamines, which are known for their effect on tight chromatin packaging in sperm cells and association with sperm DNA fragmentation [24]. Sperm motility has also been indirectly associated with protamine through sperm chromatin structure assay parameters [25] and PRM3 deficient mice was shown to exhibit reduced sperm motility [26]. TMEM225 has been shown to regulate protein phosphatase 1γ2, which is necessary for sperm capacitation and motility in mice [27], whereas FSCN3 has been associated with capacitation and was proposed a role in rapid cytoskeletal changes [28]. Although none of these genes have previously been associated to hyperactivity, they have been associated to motility. It is not examined or known which type of motility, and our results suggest that the regulation of these genes are affected in the hyperactive fraction of the sperm.

Initial levels of hyperactivity

The most significant differentially expressed gene in contrast (i), high versus low levels of sperm hyperactivity at the day of ejaculation, was ARFGAP1. The ARFGAP1 protein interacts with ARF1 to regulate membrane traffic between the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum [29]. ARFGAP1 is suggested to play a role in the physiological function of sperm because of its high expression in testis [29], and another ARF GAP member, SMAP2, has been found important for acrosome formation during spermiogenesis in mice [30]. The results of our study suggest that ARFGAP1 may play a role for the initial levels of hyperactive motility in ejaculates. Whereas DNLZ (discussed above) was the most up-regulated gene in the high hyperactivity group, the novel ENSSSCG00000037477 was the most down-regulated. According to NCBI, this gene is tetratricopeptide repeat protein 37-like (TTC37), which is involved in protein-protein interactions and has mainly been studied in relation with human diseases [31]. This gene has also been associated with fertility in bulls where it was highly expressed in embryos conceived with semen from low fertility sires [32]. The mechanisms behind this gene’s involvement in hyperactive motility and fertility is, however, not known.

The testing for over-represented gene ontology pathways showed that a large proportion of the differentially expressed genes from contrast (i) belonged to the term “extracellular exosome”. The exosome is a vesicle that is released into the extracellular region, and previous studies have found that epididymal extracellular microvesicles are involved in vertebrate sperm maturation (reviewed by [33]). Moreover, boar seminal plasma exosomes have been associated with sperm motility [34]. Differentially expressed genes from this pathway includes fibronectin 1 (FN1), which has previously been found correlated with midpiece and tail sperm defects in boars [35], and which has also been correlated to total sperm motility in human [36]. FN1 was also differentially expressed at the protein level in boar seminal plasma between ejaculates with good and poor freezability [37]. Other differentially expressed genes from “extracellular exosome” include members of the heat shock protein family (Hsp70) member 4 (HSPA4) and family D (Hsp60) member 1 (HSPD1). HSPA4 is involved in spermatogenesis and a previous study found that mice lacking this gene had a reduced number of spermatozoa and reduced sperm motility [38]. HSPD1 is shown to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation during capacitation in mouse sperm [39] and it is involved in spermatogenesis in human [40]. HSPD1 has, however, not been found associated with sperm motility or hyperactive motility in human [41], and its function in boar sperm hyperactivity needs to be further investigated. In addition to HSPA4 and HSPD1, a heat shock protein regulator also belonging to “extracellular exosome”, bcl2 associated athanogene 6 (BAG6), was differentially expressed. BAG6 is the key regulator of heat shock protein HSPA2, which is involved in spermatogenesis [42,43,44] and associated with sperm motility [45]. Other differentially expressed genes of this pathway include quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1), angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE), polycystin 1 transient receptor potential channel interacting (PKD1), and CD81 molecule (CD81). QSOX1 has been suggested a role in sperm cell development in mice, based on immunohistochemical association with the sperm acrosome during maturation [46]. Testicular ACE has been found important for sperm motility and male fertility [47] and one of its products, angiotensin II, has been shown to affect sperm motility parameters such as VCL [48], which is one of the CASA parameters describing levels of hyperactivity. PKD1 is involved in testis development [49, 50] and is known to cause low sperm quality in men with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease [51]. Lack of one homozygous genotype of a PKD1 mutation in stallions also showed its importance for fertility [52], and it has been proposed that PKD1 might interact with CatSpers, which regulate sperm motility (reviewed by [53]). CD81 has previously been found expressed in mouse and bull sperm [54] and shown to be involved in spermatogenesis [55], moreover, it has been implied that a reduced fertility of CD81 knockout mice oocytes is due to failed acrosome reaction in sperm cells [56].

In contrast (i), all genes of the gene ontology term “establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradient” were differentially expressed: ATP1A1, ATP1A2, ATP1B2, ATP4A and BAX. None of these genes were significantly differentially expressed in contrast (ii), suggesting an importance for initial levels of hyperactivity at ejaculation. ATP1A1, ATP1A2 and ATP1B2 belongs to the Na,K-ATPases, which use ATP as energy to make an electrochemical gradient across cell membranes. ATP1A1 has previously been found associated with capacitation in bovine [57], however no studies have indicated such a function of ATP1A2 and ATP1B2. Several studies have however shown that another Na,K-ATPase family member, ATP1A4, is associated with sperm motility, capacitation and hyperactivity through keeping an uneven transmembrane distribution of Na+ and K+ [58,59,60]. Our study suggest a similar role for the differentially expressed Na,K-ATPase genes in hyperactivity. BAX is a member of the B-cell lymphoma 2 family and affects cell apoptosis [61], which plays an important role during the development of mature spermatozoa [62]. BAX deficient male mice have been shown to display increased apoptosis and infertility [63, 64]. Further, BAX has previously been associated with sperm motility in human [65]. The mechanism linking BAX to sperm motility was not suggested, however, it has been shown that apoptosis initiated during spermatogenesis contribute to poor sperm quality, including sperm motility [66].

Eight of the nine genes in “GATOR2 complex” were differentially expressed. GATOR2 regulates mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) signaling by interacting with Rag GTPases. Even though mTOR has previously been found important for spermatogenesis in rats [67], a similar role of the individual differentially expressed genes of this pathway (CASTOR1, MIOS, SEC13, SESN1, SESN2, SZT2, WDR24 and WDR59) has not previously been shown.

Comparison of our results with a high-throughput proteomic study conducted for human sperm motility [19], showed that 57 out of the differentially expressed genes in contrast (i) were the same as their differentially expressed proteins [See Additional File 6]. These genes were to a large degree related to metabolic pathways such as carbohydrate derivate metabolism, lipid metabolic process and protein metabolic process. Moreover, some of the genes has ATP/ADP/GTP/GDP binding activity or ATPase activity: ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 8B (ARL8B), cytochrome b5 reductase 3 (CYB5R3), eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (EEF2), H1 histone family member N testis specific (H1FNT), heat shock protein family A Hsp70 member 2 (HSPA2), 60 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial (HSPD1), lonprotease homolog mitochondrial (LONP1) and valine-tRNA ligase mitochondrial precursor (VARS). These results are not surprising as sperm cells need energy for being motile, as was also concluded by Amaral et al. [19]. Tektin 5 (TEKT5) was also in common for contrast (i) and the study of Amaral et al. [19]. This gene belongs to pathways such as sperm flagellum and motile cilium, critical pathways for sperm hyperactivity, and has previously also been associated with sperm motility in mouse [68].

Peroxiredoxin-5 mitochondrial (PRDX5), acrosin-binding protein (ACRBP) and apolipoprotein A-I (APOA1) were differentially expressed in contrast (i). This is supported by a previous study examining capacitation related proteins in boar spermatozoa [10]. It was suggested that PRDX5 plays an important role in regulating energy production in the sperm cell and in sperm-oocyte binding, whereas ACRBP regulates release of acrosin from the acrosome, a proteinase involved in sperm penetration of zona pellucida. APOA1 has previously been found to induce cholesterol efflux in spermatozoa, a process that regulates motility, hyperactivation and capacitation [69, 70].

Levels of hyperactivity after storage

The most significant differentially expressed gene in contrast (iii), high versus low change in levels of sperm hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage, was SLC40A1. This gene is involved in iron transport, and previous studies have shown that testicular iron deficiency reduce levels of spermatozoa (reviewed by [71]). The exact function for SLC40A1 in the resulting levels of sperm hyperactivity is not clear and needs to be further investigated. The most up-regulated gene in the high hyperactivity group was DNLZ, whereas the most down-regulated gene was CADPS. CADPS is involved in vesicle exocytosis of various compounds like insulin and neurotransmitters [72] and is tightly coupled to ATP activation and Ca2+ influx [73]. The protein has been found mainly expressed and studied in brain cells of human, mice and rats (e.g. [74, 75]), however it is also expressed in other mice tissues [75], and in pigs, it has been suggested as a candidate gene for body weight [76]. A function in sperm hyperactive motility have not previously been implied, however, it could be explained by its role in ATP activation and Ca2+-influx.

The two most differentially expressed terms of the gene ontology analysis for contrast (iii) were “extracellular space” and “extracellular region”. In gene ontology analyses, extracellular region is a parent term of extracellular space, and these are the cell regions where junctions between germ cells and Sertoli cells are located [77]. As germ cells mature and migrate through the testis, a cascade of signal transduction events at the junctions are involved, requiring factors such as cytokines, proteases, protease inhibitors, protein kinases, protein phosphatases, GTPases and junctional complex and extracellular matrix proteins (reviewed by [77]). We have previously shown that numerous genes in this part of spermatogenesis are important for different levels of sperm DNA fragmentation [78]. Differentially expressed genes in the current study belonging to the above-mentioned pathways include ADA2 (already discussed above), and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), TNF superfamily member 10 (TNFSF10) and WNT family member 5A (WNT5A) (last three genes discussed under “cytokine activity” below). Moreover, phospholipase A2 group IIA (PLA2G2A) was differentially expressed, a gene whose protein has previously been associated to sperm motility and fertility in human [19, 79]. Phospholipase A2 is a calcium dependent enzyme which is involved in phospholipid metabolism in membranes and it has been proposed involved in sperm motility also in other species such as sea urchin [80] and fowl [81]. In boars, it has been shown that phospholipase A2 is important for capacitation [82], the process where hyperactive motility is achieved, and the results of this study show that the phospholipase A2 PLA2G2A gene is down-regulated in samples with high hyperactivity after storage.

Another significantly overrepresented gene ontology terms for contrast (iii) was “cytokine activity”, which includes the three differentially expressed genes CXCL10, TNFSF10 and WNT5A. Levels of different cytokines have previously been associated to sperm motility and progressive motility in human (e.g. [83, 84]), and our results suggest that cytokines have an effect on hyperactive motility after storage of sperm cells. Cytokines are important for cellular immune responses and are involved in spermatogenesis in the testis by affecting Sertoli – germ cell interactions [77]. CXCL10 was down-regulated in the group with high change in levels of hyperactivity after 96 h storage. It has previously been shown to cause germ cell apoptosis in mice, where CXCL10 knock-out mice had reduced apoptosis [85]. Further, CXCL10 was related to sperm survival in chicken [86]. A role for this gene in sperm hyperactive motility has not previously been indicated, however, previous experiments showed a negative correlation between proportion of apoptotic cells, where apoptosis is initiated during spermatogenesis, and sperm motility in ejaculates [66]. TNFSF10 is an important signaling molecule for proper germ cell apoptosis as knock-out mice showed a dramatically reduced production of mature spermatozoa [87]. Moreover, TNFSF10 was found up-regulated in Landrace boars with high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation in our previous study [78], suggesting that this gene affects several sperm quality parameters. Finally, WNT5A is involved in self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells [88], a process which is essential for spermatogenesis.

Breed differences

In this study, Landrace and Duroc samples were analyzed using the same CASA settings, however, after RNA sequencing, the extreme samples from Duroc did not cluster according to their hyperactive phenotype. The Duroc boars had a higher variability in their hyperactivity levels (Table 1) than the Landrace boars and both the high and low group of Duroc boars had higher levels of hyperactivity compared to Landrace high and low groups. The lack of clustering could suggest that their hyperactivity levels might not be extreme enough, but it could also imply that the settings of the CASA were not appropriate for this breed. For CASA measurements, various instrument settings for different species are most commonly used. For example, the instrument defines and classifies sperm motility patterns differently, and motility characterizations are not identical for different species [89]. It has also been shown previously that different cattle breeds should have different CASA settings due to their large variability in sperm variables [90]. The results of the current study might suggest that breed specific characteristics exists for pigs as well. Our previous study found differences between Landrace and Duroc with regards to hyperactive motility [6]. Landrace sperm cells increased hyperactive motility with 6.3% from day of collection to 96 h storage. Duroc, on the other hand, showed higher initial sperm hyperactivity at day of collection and no significant increase after 4 days of storage. Differences in sperm physiology and semen plasma composition for these two breeds have also been found in other studies [91,92,93]. The results from the current study suggest that breed specific CASA thresholds should be tested.

Variant calling

The variant calling was done on a limited set of animals, however, a case-control study pointed towards SNP variants that are present in only one of the sample groups and hence associated to sperm hyperactivity. For contrast (i), 278 SNPs were different between the high and low hyperactivity groups. Eighteen of these variants had a moderate or low predicted impact according to Ensemble VEP and were located in genes NEU3, CHRDL2, HMCN1 and uncharacterized genes ENSSSCG00000002261 and ENSSSCG00000026662. NEU3 is a sialidase whose activity has previously been found necessary for capacitation and zona pellucida binding [94]. It is therefore interesting that 13 of the 18 SNPs with low/moderate impact are located in NEU3, including rs318364485 with a predicted deleterious SIFT score (0.05). Moreover, 90 of the modifier impact SNPs are also located in NEU3. The effect should be examined in a larger animal material to see if this SNP could function as a biomarker for sperm hyperactivity.

As this material offers a limited number of animals, additional SNPs could be informative if tested in a larger population. We therefore had a look at SNPs present in the differentially expressed genes. SNPs with a predicted high impact were identified in 15 of the differentially expressed genes of contrast (i). Of these, CFAP65 has previously been associated with spermatogenesis and flagellar development [95], and loss of function of the chicken ortholog of CFAP65 has been shown to cause defective sperm motility [96]. Two of the putative high impact SNPs could not be verified in an independent sequencing dataset from the same Landrace population, suggesting that these variants might be false positives or very rare. Even though the other genes with high impact SNPs have not previously been associated with sperm quality, their significant differential expression as well as high impact SNPs make them candidates for further testing as fertility biomarkers.

For contrast (iii), 19 SNPs were different in the case-control analysis between the high and low change in hyperactivity level difference between day 0 and 96 h storage. All of these SNPs were modifier impact, meaning that they are not predicted to have a large impact, however, regulatory SNPs might be located in regions such as 3’UTR [97], which are classified as modifier by VEP, so the identified SNPs could affect levels of hyperactivity after storage through such mechanisms.

Conclusions

In this study, we performed transcriptome profiling of boar testis tissue from Landrace and Duroc boars based on their levels of sperm hyperactive motility at the day of ejaculation (day 0) and on their change in hyperactive motility between day 0 and 96 h storage. We identified differentially expressed genes and pathways from Landrace boars with high and low levels of hyperactivity on the day of ejaculation (contrast i) and boars with high and low change in hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h liquid storage at 18 °C (contrast iii). Each contrast consisted of three to five animals per group and the animals showed consistently high or low levels of hyperactivity. Overall, our data suggests that DNLZ is important for sperm hyperactivity regardless of storage, whereas ARFGAP1 and SLC40A1 were the most significant genes for contrasts (i) and (iii), respectively. More than 100,000 filtered high-quality SNPs were identified in the dataset, and a predicted deleterious SNP in the differentially expressed gene NEU3 was detected by case-control analysis. The limited number of animals (n = 3–5 for each group) could affect the results of this study. The results of this study provide novel insight regarding testis gene expression and its importance for sperm hyperactive motility. Genes and variants identified might be candidate markers useful for predicting boar fertility.

Methods

Aim and design of the study

The aim of this study was to identify differential expression of genes in testis tissue from boars with high and low levels of sperm hyperactive motility at ejaculation and change in hyperactive motility after storage. To facilitate this, testis tissue samples were collected at slaughter from AI boars, whose ejaculates had been used for hyperactivity measurements. Samples from boars with repeated extreme high or low sperm hyperactive motility at the day of ejaculation (day 0) and high or low change in hyperactive motility between day 0 and 96 h storage were selected for transcriptome sequencing.

Materials

Semen collected from 103 purebred Norwegian Landrace boars (n = 239 ejaculates) and 88 purebred Duroc boars (n = 179 ejaculates) at the AI station run by Norsvin at Hamar, Norway, were the basis for this study. All boars were routinely used for AI and the ejaculates were part of routine collections for the breeding program. The boars were housed in individual 6 m2 pens, fed a standard commercial diet and had access to straw and sawdust as rooting materials. The ejaculate samples were collected between February 21st, 2014 and March 20th, 2015 and the age of the boars at semen collection for sampling ranged from 241 to 1041 days (median age = 338 days). Testis tissue samples were collected after slaughter and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, before storage at − 80 °C until RNA extraction. For Landrace boars with extreme levels of hyperactivity on day 0, 4 boars with high values and 4 boars with low values were selected (contrast (i)). For Duroc boars with extreme levels of hyperactivity on day 0, 3 boars with high levels and 4 boars with low levels were selected (contrast (ii)). For Landrace boars with high versus low changes in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage, 5 boars with high levels and 4 boars with low levels were included in the study (contrast (iii)).

Hyperactivity measurements

The sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculates was collected using the gloved hand technique, as described by Althouse et al. [98]. At the AI station, motility and morphology were subjectively evaluated using phase contrast microscopy (Leica DM 4000B, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at 37 °C, and ejaculates with < 70% motile and/or > 20% morphologically abnormal spermatozoa were discarded. Ejaculates approved by the quality check were diluted to achieve a concentration of 25 × 106 cells/mL in Androstar® Plus extender (Minitube, 84,184 Tiefenbach, Germany), transferred to airtight tubes containing doses of 89 mL, and stored in liquid conditions at 18 °C until shipment. Only semen accepted for AI was used in this study. During the 15 min long transportation from the AI station to the laboratory, the samples were packed in a styrofoam box to ensure a stable temperature. At the laboratory, semen was transferred to 15 mL falcon tubes and the samples were taken for CASA analysis at the day of collection (day 0) and after storage at 18 °C for 96 h (day 4), as this is the time limit recommended by Norsvin for using the dose. In order to be included in the selection of extreme animals, the boars needed at least three consistent measurements on % hyperactivity (Table 1).

RNA extraction and sequencing

The RNeasy Midi Kit (Qiagen) was used to extract total RNA from testis tissue. RNA concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, DE, USA) and the quality was examined by the 28S:18S rRNA ratio using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip® Kit on 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). All samples showed RNA integrity numbers (RIN) > 7.8 and a 260/280 ratio > 1.9. The sequencing was conducted by the Norwegian Sequencing Centre at the Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo (http://www.sequencing.uio.no). Libraries were prepared using TruSeq mRNA stranded HT kit (Illumina) on a Sciclone NGSx liquid automation system (Perkin Elmer). Final library quality check was performed on Fragment Analyser (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Inc) and by qPCR (Kapa Biosciences). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 according to manufacturer’s instructions. Image analysis and base calling were performed using Illumina’s RTA software v2.7.7. The reads were 100 base library pair single reads and filtered to remove those with low base call quality using Illumina’s default chastity criteria. All samples were run over two sequencing lanes and the number of reads per sample ranged from 65 to 196 million with an average of 98 million reads. The data has been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [99] with GEO series accession number GSE141541.

Processing and differential expression of RNA sequencing data

Trimmomatic v.0.36 [11] was used to trim reads by removing leading bases with Phred33 quality scores < 5, trailing bases with Phred33 quality scores < 3, using a sliding window of 4 bases and removing the 5′ terminal base if the average Phred33 score of the 4 bases was < 15, and completely discard trimmed reads with less than 36 remaining bases. The high quality reads were subsequently mapped to the pig genome Sscrofa build 11.1 using the Star software v.2.5.2a and default parameters while simultaneously adding unique read groups to the files [100]. Gene prediction coordinates (release 11.1.90) were obtained from Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org). Samtools v.1.3.1 [101] was used to merge bams from the same sample and to convert bam files to sam files before HTSeq [102] was run with the reverse stranded option to calculate the number of reads mapped to each gene. The differential expression analysis was conducted using the package edgeR v.3.12.1 in the R environment [103]. The two breeds and different contrasts were analyzed separately, and the samples were divided into a high-low hyperactivity level contrast based on their hyperactivity values. Filtering was done to keep only genes that achieved at least one count per million in at least half of the samples, and the data was normalized for differences in the abundance of read counts mapped to genes between samples using the TMM (trimmed mean of M-values) normalization method [104]. This adjusts any differential expression analysis for varying sequencing depths and different library sizes and is part of the basic modeling procedure in edgeR. Variance in gene expression was estimated using a tagwise dispersion model before differential expression was detected with a likelihood ratio test model (option glmFit in edgeR). FDR was calculated using the Bejamini-Hochberg algorithm [105], and an FDR < 0.05 was considered significant. Gene ontology analyses were run using the R package “goseq” v.1.26.0 [106] using BioMart as implemented in R (biomaRt v.2.30.9) [107] to incorporate pig IDs and the Wallenius approximation method to account for length biases. Pathways with an overrepresented p-value < 0.001 was considered significant.

Variant calling

Preprocessing of bam files was performed using Picard (sorting, duplicate marking, and indexing) [108]. Variant calling on the Landrace RNA sequencing data was conducted using Samtools v.1.3.1 mpileup and bcftools call [101]. Detected variants were filtered, using bcftools filter and vcftools [109], on alternate allele count (> 2), QUAL (> 25), mapping quality (> 10) and read depth (> 10). Furthermore, both reference and alternate allele had to be present on both strands, and a threshold of at least 4 bp to the next SNP and 10 bp to the next indel was also applied. The filtered variants were subsequently annotated using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) [110] to classify variants and their impact. SnpSift v.4.3 was subsequently used to estimate case-control (i.e. high versus low hyperactivity) using an allelic model (CC_ALL) and Fisher exact test [111]. Variants were considered significantly different at p < 0.001. SNP validation was done in silico by matching detected variants to known pig entries collected using VEP and by comparison to an existing independent whole-genome sequence dataset of related boars [78].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the additional files and in NCBI’s GEO database with accession number GSE141541.

Abbreviations

ACE:

Angiotensin I converting enzyme

ACRBP:

Acrosin-binding protein

ADA:

Adenosine deaminase

ADA2:

Adenosine deaminase 2

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

AGGF1:

Angiogenic factor with G-patch and FHA domains 1

AI:

Artificial insemination

ALH:

Amplitude of lateral head displacement

APOA1:

Apolipoprotein A-I

ARFGAP1:

ADP ribosylation factor GTPase activating protein 1

ARL8B:

ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 8B

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

ATP1A1:

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 1

ATP1A2:

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 2

ATP1A4:

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 4

ATP1B2:

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit beta 2

ATP4A:

ATPase H+/K+ transporting subunit alpha

BAG6:

bcl2 associated athanogene 6

BAX:

BLC2 associated X, apoptosis regulator

Bp:

Base pairs

CAB39:

Calcium binding protein 39

CADPS:

Calcium dependent secretion activator

CASA:

Computer-assisted sperm analysis

CASTOR1:

Cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1

CatSper:

Cation channel of sperm

CCDC187:

Coiled-coil domain containing 187

CD81:

CD81 molecule

CFAP65:

Cilia and flagella associated protein 65

CHRDL2:

Chordin like 2

CXCL10:

C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10

CYB5R3:

Cytochrome b5 reductase 3

DNLZ:

DNL-type zinc finger

EEF2:

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2

FDR:

False discovery rate

FN1:

Fibronectin 1

FSCN3:

Fascin-3

GDP:

Guanosine diphosphate

GEO:

Gene Expression Omnibus

GGNBP2:

Gametogenetin binding protein 2

GTP:

Guanosine triphosphate

H1FNT:

H1 histone family member N testis specific

HIP1:

Huntington interacting protein 1 gene

HMCN1:

Hemicentin 1

Hsp70:

Heat shock protein 70 kilodalton

HSPA2:

Heat shock protein family A Hsp70 member 2

HSPA4:

Heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 4

HSPA9:

Heat shock protein family A Hsp70 member 9

HSPD1:

60 kDa heat shock protein mitochondrial

LIN:

Inearity

LONP1:

Lonprotease homolog mitochondrial

MIOS:

MEIOSIS regulator for oocyte development

mTOR:

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

NEU3:

Neuraminidase 3

NUTM1:

NUT midline carcinoma family member 1

PPIG:

Peptidylprolyl isomerase G

PKD1:

Polycystin 1 transient receptor potential channel interacting

PLA2G2A:

Phospholipase A2 group IIA

PRDX5:

Peroxiredoxin-5 mitochondrial

PRM1:

Protamine 1

PRM3:

Protamine 3

PRMT2:

Protein arginine methyltransferase 2

QSOX1:

Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1

RADIL:

Rap associating with DIL domain

RAVER1:

Ribonucleoprotein PTB binding 1

RIN:

RNA integrity number

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

RPS9:

Ribosomal protein S9

RUVBL1:

RuvB like AAA ATPase 1

SD:

Standard deviation

SEC13:

SEC13 homolog nuclear pore and COPII coat complex component

SESN1:

Sestrin 1

SESN2:

Sestrin 2

SLC40A1:

Solute carrier family 40 member 1

SMAP2:

Small arfGAP2

SZT2:

KICSTOR complex subunit

TEKT5:

Tektin 5

TMEM225B:

Transmembrane protein 225B

TMM:

Trimmed mean of M-values

TNFSF10:

TNF superfamily member 10

TTC37:

Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 37-like

UTR:

Untranslated region

VARS:

Valine-tRNA ligase mitochondrial precursor

VEP:

Ensembl variant effect predictor

VCL:

Curvilinear velocity

WDR24:

WD repeat domain 24

WDR59:

WD repeat domain 59

WNT5A:

WNT family member 5A

WOB:

Wobble

References

  1. 1.

    Didion BA. Computer-assisten semen analysis and its utility for profiling boar semen samples. Theriogenology. 2008;70(8):1374–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology. 2002;57:149–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mortimer ST. A critical review of the physiological importance and analysis of sperm movement in mammals. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3(5):403–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Suarez SS. Control of hyperactivation in sperm. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):647–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schmidt H, Kamp G. Induced hyperactivity in boar spermatozoa and its evaluation by computer-assisted sperm analysis. Reproduction. 2004;128:171–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tremoen NH, Gaustad AH, Andersen-Ranberg I, van Son M, Zeremichael TT, Frydenlund K, Grindflek E, Våge DI, Myromslien FD. Relationship between sperm motility characteristics and ATP concentrations, and association with fertility in two different pig breeds. Anim Reprod Sci. 2018;193:226–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Singh AP, Rajender S. CatSper channel, sperm function and male fertility. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30(1):28–38.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vicente-Carrillo A, Álvarez-Rodrìguez M, Rodríguez-Martínez H. The CatSper channel modulates boar sperm motility during capacitation. Reprod Biol. 2017;17(1):69–78.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dorin JR. Novel phenotype of mouse spermatozoa following deletion of nine β-defensin genes. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2015;17(5):716–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kwon WS, Rahman MS, Lee JS, Kim J, Yoon SJ, Park YJ, You YA, Hwang S, Pang MG. A comprehensive proteomic approach to identifying capacitation related proteins in boar spermatozoa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:897.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;31(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Warr A, Affara N, Aken B, Beiki H, Bickhart DM, Billis K, Chow W, Eory L, Finlayson HA, Flicek P et al: An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research. bioRxiv 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    van Son M, Enger EG, Grove H, Ros-Freixedes R, Kent MP, Lien S, Grindflek E. Genome-wide association study confirm major QTL for backfat fatty acid composition on SSC14 in Duroc pigs. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):369.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mortimer ST, Swan MA, Mortimer D. Effect of seminal plasma on capacitation and hyperactivation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2139–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Apić J, Stančić I, Vakanjac S, Radović I, Milovanović A, Barna T, Maletić M. Influence of the protein content of boar seminal plasma on spermatozoa viability, motility and acrosome integrity in diluted semen stored for 3 days. Anim Reprod. 2016;13(1):36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhai P, Vu MT, Hoff KG, Silberg JJ. A conserved histidine in human DNLZ/HEP is required for stimulation of HSPA9 ATPase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;408(4):589–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhai P, Stanworth C, Liu S, Silberg JJ. The human escort protein Hep binds to the ATPase domain of mitochondrial hsp70 and regulates ATP hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(38):26098–106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hashemitabar M, Sabbagh S, Orazizadeh M, Ghadiri A, Bahmanzadeh M. A proteomic analysis on human sperm tail: comparison between normozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(6):853–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Amaral A, Paiva C, Parrinello CA, Estanyol JM, Ballescà JL, Ramalho-Santos J, Oliva R. Identification of proteins involved in human sperm motility using high-throughput differential proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(12):5670–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shen MR, Linden J, Chiang PH, Chen SS, Wu SN. Adenosine stimulates human sperm motility via A2 receptors. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1993;45(7):650–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fénichel P, Gharib A, Emiliozzi C, Donzeau M, Ménézo Y. Stimulation of human sperm during capacitation in vitro by an adenosine agonist with specificity for A2 receptors. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(6):1405–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Adeoya-Osiguwa SA, Fraser LR. Capacitation state-dependent changes in adenosine receptors and their regulation of adenylyl cyclase/cAMP. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;63(2):245–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Khatchadourian K, Smith CE, Metzler M, Gregory M, Hayden MR, Cyr DG, Hermo L. Structural abnormalities in spermatids together with reduced sperm counts and motility underlie the reproductive defect in HIP1−/− mice. Gamete Biology. 2006;74(3):341–59.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aoki VW, Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Liu L, Mullen BM, Carrell DT. DNA integrity is compromised in protamine-deficient human sperm. J Androl. 2013;26(6):741–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Giwercman A, Richthoff J, Hjøllund H, Bonde JP, Jepson K, Frohm B, Spano M. Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1404–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Grzmil P, Boinska D, Kleene KC, Adham I, Schlüter G, Kämper M, Buyandelger B, Meinhardt A, Wolf S, Engel W. Prm3, the fourth gene in the mouse protamine gene cluster, encodes a conserved acidic protein that affects sperm motility. Biol Reprod. 2008;78(6):958–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Matsuura M, Yogo K. TMEM225: a possible protein phosphatase 1γ2 (PP1γ2) regulator localizes to the equatorial segment in mouse spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(2):139–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Baker MA, Reeves G, Hetherington L, Aitken RJ. Analysis of proteomic changes associated with sperm capacitation through the combined use of IPG-strip pre-fractionation followed by RP chromatography LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteomics. 2010;10(3):482–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang C, Yu Y, Zhang S, Liu M, Xing G, Wei H, Bi J, Liu X, Zhou G, Dong C, et al. Characterization, chromosomal assignment, and tissue expression of a novel human gene belonging to the ARF GAP family. Genomics. 2000;63(3):400–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Funaki T, Kon S, Tanabe K, Natsume W, Sato S, Shimizu T, Yoshida N, Wong WF, Ogura A, Ogawa T, et al. The Arf GAP SMAP2 is necessary for organized vesicle budding from the trans-Golgi network and subsequent acrosome formation in spermiogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24(17):2633–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hartley JL, Zachos NC, Dawood B, Donowitz M, Forman J, Pollitt RJ, Morgan NV, Tee L, Gissen P, Kahr WH, et al. Mutations in TTC37 cause trichohepatoenteric syndrome (phenotypic diarrhea of infancy). Gastroenterology. 2010;138(7):2388–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kropp J, Carrillo JA, Namous H, Daniels A, Salih SM, Song J, Khatib H. Male fertility status is associated with DNA methylation signatures in sperm and transcriptomic profiles of bovine preimplantation embryos. BMC Genomics 2017. 2017;18:280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sullivan R. Epididymosomes: Role of extracellular microvesicles in sperm maturation. Front Biosci (Scholar edition). 2016;8:106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Du J, Shen J, Wang Y, Pan C, Pang W, Diao H, Dong W. Boar seminal plasma exosomes maintain sperm function by infiltrating into the sperm membrane. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):58832–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    González-Cadavid V, Martins JA, Moreno FB, Andrade TS, Santos AC, Monteiro-Moreira AC, Moreira RA, Moura AA. Seminal plasma proteins of adult boars and correlations with sperm parameters. Theriogenology. 2014;82(5):697–707.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wennemuth G, Meinhardt A, Mallidis C, Albrecht M, Krause W, Renneberg H, Aumüller G. Assessment of fibronectin as a potential new clinical tool in andrology. Andrologia. 2001;33(1):43–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vilagran I, Yeste M, Sancho S, Castillo J, Oliva R, Bonet S. Comparative analysis of boar seminal plasma proteome from different freezability ejaculates and identification of Fibronectin 1 as sperm freezability marker. Andrology. 2015;3(2):345–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Held T, Barakat AZ, Mohamed BA, Paprotta I, Meinhardt A, Engel W, Adham IM. Heat-shock protein HSPA4 is required for progression of spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2011;142(1):133–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Asquith KL, Baleato RM, McLaughlin EA, Nixon B, Aitken RJ. Tyrosine phosphorylation activates surface chaperones facilitating sperm–zona recognition. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:3645–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lachance C, Fortier M, Thimon V, Sullivan R, Bailey JL, Leclerc P. Localization of Hsp60 and Grp78 in the human testis, epididymis and mature spermatozoa. Int J Androl. 2010;33(1):33–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lachance C, Bailey JL, Leclerc P. Expression of Hsp60 and Grp78 in the human endometrium and oviduct, and their effect on sperm functions. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2606–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Govin J, Caron C, Escoffier E, Ferro M, Kuhn L, Rousseaux S, Eddy EM, Garin J, Khochbin S. Post-meiotic shifts in HSPA2/HSP70.2 chaperone activity during mouse spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(49):37888–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bromfield E, Aitken RJ, Nixon B. Novel characterization of the HSPA2-stabilizing protein BAG6 in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21(10):755–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sasaki T, Macron E, McQuire T, Arai Y, Moens PB, Okada H. Bat3 deficiency accelerates the degradation of Hsp70-2/HspA2 during spermatogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2008;182(3):449.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Martínez-Heredia J, de Mateo S, Vidal-Taboada JM, Ballescà JL, Oliva R. Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):783–91.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang TE, Li SH, Minabe S, Anderson AL, Dun MD, Maeda KI, Matsuda F, Chang HW, Nixon B, Tsai PJ. Mouse quiescin sulfhydryl oxidases exhibit distinct epididymal luminal distribution with segment-specific sperm surface associations. Biol Reprod. 2018;99(5):1022–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hagaman JR, Moyer JS, Bachman ES, Sibony M, Magyar PL, Welch JE, Smithies O, Krege JH, O'Brien DA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and male fertility. Proc Nat Acad United States America. 1998;95(5):2552–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ball BA, Gravance CG, Wessel MT, Sabeur K. Activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in reproductive tissues of the stallion and effects of angiotensin II on sperm motility. Theriogenology. 2003;59(3–4):901–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nie X, Arend LJ. Pkd1 is required for male reproductive tract development. Mech Dev. 2013;130(11–12):567–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Nie X, Arend LJ. Novel roles of Pkd2 in male reproductive system development. Differentiation. 2014;87(3–4):161–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Vora N, Perrone R, Bianchi DW. Reproductive issues for adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(2):307–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Schrimpf R, Gottschalk M, Metzger J, Martinsson G, Sieme H, Distl O. Screening of whole genome sequences identified high-impact variants for stallion fertility. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:288.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Garbers DL. Swimming with sperm. Nature. 2001;413:579–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jankovicova J, Frolikova M, Sebkova N, Simon M, Cupperova P, Lipcseyova D, Michalkova K, Horovska L, Sedlacek R, Stopka P, et al. Characterization of tetraspanin protein CD81 in mouse spermatozoa and bovine gametes. Reproduction. 2016;152(6):785–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kierszenbaum AL, Rosselot C, Rivkin E, Tres LL. Role of integrins, tetraspanins, and ADAM proteins during the development of apoptotic bodies by spermatogenic cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006;73(7):906–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tanigawa M, Miyamoto K, Kobayashi S, Sato M, Akutsu H, Okabe M, Mekada E, Sakakibara K, Miyado M, Umezawa A, et al. Possible involvement of CD81 in acrosome reaction of sperm in mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(1):150–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rajamanickam GD, Kastelic JP, Thundathil JC. Na/K-ATPase regulates bovine sperm capacitation through raft- and non-raft-mediated signaling mechanisms. Mol Reprod Dev. 2017;84(11):1168–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Newton LD, Krishnakumar S, Menon AG, Kastelic JP, van der Hoorn FA, Thundathil JC. Na+/K+ATPase regulates sperm capacitation through aMechanism involving kinases and redistribution of ItsTestis-specific isoform. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(2):136–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kocak-Toker N, Aktan G, Aykac-Toker G. The role of Na,K-ATPase in human sperm motility. Int J Androl. 2002;25(3):180–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jimenez T, Sanchez G, McDermott JP, Nguyen A-N, Kumar TR, Blanco G. Increased Expression of the Na,K-ATPase alpha4 Isoform Enhances Sperm Motility in Transgenic Mice. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(1):153–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Tikhomirov O, Carpenter G. Bax activation and translocation to mitochondria mediate EGF-induced programmed cell death. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:5681–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Billig H, Furuta I, Rivier C, Tapanainen J, Parvinen M, Hsueh AJ. Apoptosis in testis germ cells: developmental changes in gonadotropin dependence and localization to selective tubule stages. Endocrinology. 1995;136(1):5–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Knudson CM, Tung KS, Tourtellotte WG, Brown GA, Korsmeyer SJ. Bax-deficient mice with lymphoid hyperplasia and male germ cell death. Science. 1995;270(5233):96–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rodriguez I, Ody C, Araki K, Garcia I, Vassalli P. An early and massive wave of germinal cell apoptosis is required for the development of functional spermatogenesis. EMBO J. 1997;16(9):2262–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Mostafa T, Rashed L, Nabil N, Amin R. Seminal BAX and BCL2 gene and protein expressions in infertile men with varicocele. Urology. 2014;84(3):590–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Shen H-M, Dai J, Chia S-E, Lim A, Ong C-N. Detection of apoptotic alterations in sperm in subfertile patients and their correlations with sperm quality. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1266–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Xu H, Shen L, Chen X, Ding Y, He J, Zhu J, Wang Y, Liu X. mTOR/P70S6K promotes spermatogonia proliferation and spermatogenesis in Sprague Dawley rats. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32(2):207–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cao W, Ijiri TW, Huang AP, Gerton GL. Characterization of a novel tektin member, TEKT5, in mouse sperm. J Androl. 2011;32(1):55–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Travis AJ, Kopf GS. The role of cholesterol efflux in regulating the fertilization potential of mammalian spermatozoa. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(6):731–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Morales CR, Marat AL, Ni X, Yu Y, Oko R, Smith BT, Argraves WS. ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCA1, ABCA7, and ABCG1 in mouse spermatozoa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376(3):472–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sylvester SR, Griswold MD. The testicular iron shuttle: a "nurse" function of the Sertoli cells. J Androl. 1994;15(5):381–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Miyake K, Ohta T, Nakayama H, Doe N, Terao Y, Oiki E, Nagatomo I, Yamashita Y, Abe T, Nishikura K, et al. CAPS1 RNA editing promotes dense Core vesicle exocytosis. Cell Rep. 2016;17(8):2004–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hay JC, Martin TFJ. Resolution of regulated secretion into sequential MgATP-dependent and calcium-dependent stages mediated by distinct cytosolic proteins. J Cell Biol. 1992;119(1):139–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Speidel D, Varoqueaux F, Enk C, Nojiri M, Grishanin RN, Martin TFJ, Hofmann K, Brose N, Reim K. A family of Ca2+−dependent activator proteins for secretion. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:52802–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sadakata T, Wahida M, Morita N, Furuichi T. Tissue distribution of Ca2+−dependent activator protein for secretion family members CAPS1 and CAPS2 in mice. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007;55(3):301–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Yang Q, Wu P, Wang K, Chen D, Zhou J, Ma J, Li M, Xiao W, Jiang A, Jiang Y, et al. SNPs associated with body weight and backfat thickness in two pig breeds identified by a genome-wide association study. Genomics. 2018;S0888-7543(18):30329.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-germ cell interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(5):747–806.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    van Son M, Tremoen NH, Gaustad AH, Myromslien FD, Våge DI, Stenseth EB, Zeremichael TT, Grindflek E. RNA sequencing reveals candidate genes and polymorphisms related to sperm DNA integrity in testis tissue from boars. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13(1):362.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Anfuso CD, Olivieri M, Bellanca S, Salmeri M, Motta C, Scalia M, Satriano C, La Vignera S, Burrello N, Caporarello N, et al. Asthenozoospermia and membrane remodeling enzymes: a new role for phospholipase A2. Andrology. 2015;3(6):1173–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Loza-Huerta A, Vera-Estrella R, Darszon A, Beltrán C. Certain Strongylocentrotus purpuratus sperm mitochondrial proteins co-purify with low density detergent-insoluble membranes and are PKA or PKC-substrates possibly involved in sperm motility regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(11):5305–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Froman DP, Feltmann AJ. Fowl (Gallus domesticus) sperm motility depends upon mitochondrial calcium cycling driven by extracellular sodium. Biol Reprod. 2005;72(1):97–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Roldan ERS, Vazquez JM. Bicarbonate/CO2 induces rapid activation of phospholipase A2 and renders boar spermatozoa capable of undergoing acrosomal exocytosis in response to progesterone. FEBS Lett. 1996;396(2–3):227–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Gruschwitz MS, Brezinschek R, Brezinschek H-P. Cytokine levels in the seminal plasma of infertile males. J Androl. 1996;17(2):158–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Perdichizzi A, Nicoletti F, La Vignera S, Barone N, D'Agata R, Vicari E, Calogero AE. Effects of tumor necrosis factor-α on human sperm motility and apoptosis. J Clin Immunol. 2007;27(2):152–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Jiang Q, Wang F, Shi L, Zhao X, Gong M, Liu W, Song C, Li Q, Chen Y, Wu H, et al. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 produced by mouse Sertoli cells in response to mumps virus infection induces male germ cell apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(10):e3146.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Atikuzzaman M, Sanz L, Pla D, Alvarez-Rodriguez M, Rubér M, Wright D, Calvete JJ, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Selection for higher fertility reflects in the seminal fluid proteome of modern domestic chicken. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2017;21:27–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Lin YC, Richburg JH. Characterization of the role of tumor necrosis factor apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in spermatogenesis through the evaluation of trail gene-deficient mice. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93926.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Yeh JR, Zhang X, Nagano MC. Wnt5a is a cell-extrinsic factor that supports self-renewal of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 14):2357–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Amann RP, Waberski D. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): Capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology. 2014;81(1):5–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Bompart D, Vázquez RF, Gómez R, Valverde A, Roldán ERS, García-Molina A, Soler C. Combined effects of type and depth of counting chamber, and rate of image frame capture, on bull sperm motility and kinematics. Anim Reprod Sci. 2019;209:106169.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Waterhouse KE, De Angelis PM, Haugan T, Paulenz H, Hofmo PO, Farstad W. Effects of in vitro storage time and semen-extender on membrane quality of boar sperm assessed by flow cytometry. Theriogenology. 2004;62:1638–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Waterhouse KE, Hofmo PO, Tverdal A, Miller RR. Within and between breed differences in freezing tolerance and plasma membrane fatty acid composition of boar sperm. Reproduction. 2006;131:887–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Saravia F, Núñez-Martìnez I, Morán JM, Soler C, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Martínez H, Peña FJ. Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology. 2007;68(2):196–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ma F, Wu D, Deng L, Secrest P, Zhao J, Varki N, Lindheim S, Gagneux P. Sialidases on mammalian sperm mediate deciduous sialylation during capacitation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(45):38073–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Tang S, Wang X, Li W, Xang X, Li Z, Liu W, Li C, Zhu Z, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Biallelic mutations in CFAP43 and CFAP44 cause male infertility with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(6):854–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Imsland F, Feng C, Boije H, Bed'hom B, Fillon V, Dorshorst B, Rubin CJ, Liu R, Gao Y, Gu X, et al. The Rose-comb mutation in chickens constitutes a structural rearrangement causing both altered comb morpholoty and defective sperm motility. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002775.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ramírez-Bello J, Jiménez-Morales M. Functional implications of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in protein-coding and non-coding RNA genes in multifactorial diseases. Gac Med Mex. 2017;153(2):238–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Althouse GC, Levis DG, Diehl J. Semen collection, evaluation, and processing in the boar. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq - a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Series B. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Durinck S, Spellman P, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1184–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Picardtoolkit [http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/].

  109. 109.

    Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GRS, Thormann A, Flicek P, Cunningham F. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Ruden DM, Lu X. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6(2):80–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank BioBank AS for collecting and storing samples, the Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences for providing lab facilities, the Centre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE) at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences for providing lab and computer facilities, and the Norwegian Sequencing Centre at Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, for performing the sequencing. We are also grateful to the semen collectors and laboratory technicians at Norsvin, Hamar, for taking and processing samples for motility analyses.

Funding

The current study was financed by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant number 207568) and Norsvin SA. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study or the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Norsvin SA, 2317, Hamar, Norway

    Maren van Son, Ann Helen Gaustad & Eli Grindflek

  2. Department of Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2318, Hamar, Norway

    Nina Hårdnes Tremoen, Ann Helen Gaustad, Teklu Tewoldebrhan Zeremichael & Frøydis Deinboll Myromslien

  3. Centre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway

    Nina Hårdnes Tremoen & Dag Inge Våge

Authors
  1. Maren van Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nina Hårdnes Tremoen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ann Helen Gaustad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dag Inge Våge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Teklu Tewoldebrhan Zeremichael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frøydis Deinboll Myromslien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eli Grindflek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MvS conducted RNA extraction, analyzed the data and drafted the paper. NHT was involved in hyperactive motility analyses and contributed to writing the paper. AHG was involved in planning the project, supervised hyperactive motility analyses and contributed to writing the paper. DIV was involved in supervision and contributed to writing the paper. FDM was involved in planning the project, supervision and contributed to writing the paper. TTZ conducted hyperactive motility analyses. EG was involved in planning the project, supervision and contributed to writing the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maren van Son.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animals were cared for in line with laws, internationally recognized guidelines and regulations for keeping pigs in Norway (The Animal Protection Act of December 20th, 1974, the Animal Welfare Act of June 19th, 2009 and the Regulations for keeping of pigs in Norway of February 18th, 2003). The animals used in this study were AI boars kept as a routine by Norsvin’s breeding program. Ejaculate samples used in this study were part of routine collections, and testis tissue samples were taken after regular slaughter, meaning no ethics committee approval was needed. No animal experiments have been conducted in the scope of this research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Differentially expressed genes for hyperactivity at ejaculation (day 0) in Landrace. The results are presented with Ensembl gene id, gene symbol, gene name, fold change and significance level (FDR).

Additional file 2.

Differentially expressed genes for change in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace. The results are presented with Ensembl gene id, gene symbol, gene name, fold change and significance level (FDR).

Additional file 3.

Variants identified in the Landrace animals of contrasts (i) and (iii). The variants are presented per chromosome with Ensembl VEP information.

Additional file 4

Variant case-control analysis. Chromosome, position, number of homozygous, heterozygous and total variants in cases and controls, Fisher exact test p-value for the case control allelic model according to SnpSift (CC_ALL, see Methods), and contrast for significance (Table X1). Consequence, impact, gene id, ensembl gene id, existing variation and SIFT scores are included in Table X2.

Additional file 5.

Variants occuring in differentially expressed genes. Variants in genes identified for hyperactivity at Day 0 in Landrace (contrast (i), Table X1), change in levels of hyperactivity between day 0 and 96 h storage in Landrace (contrast (iii), Table X2), and genes in common for contrasts (i) and (iii) (Table X3). The SNPs are presented with Ensembl gene id, gene name, significance level of differentially expressed gene (FDR), chromosome (SSC) and position, effect, impact, existing ID and SIFT score.

Additional file 6.

Overlapping results of contrast (i) and proteins involved in human sperm motility. Comparison of our results with the study of Amaral et al. [19] showed that 57 out of the differentially expressed genes in contrast (i) were the same as their differentially expressed proteins.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Son, M., Tremoen, N.H., Gaustad, A.H. et al. Transcriptome profiling of porcine testis tissue reveals genes related to sperm hyperactive motility. BMC Vet Res 16, 161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02373-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sperm hyperactivity
  • Hyperactive motility
  • Testis
  • Gene expression
  • Pig
  • RNA sequencing

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us

\