Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Application of different laboratory techniques to monitor the behaviour of a Mycoplasma synoviae vaccine (MS-H) in broiler breeders

BMC Veterinary Research201814:357

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1669-8

  • Received: 12 December 2017
  • Accepted: 24 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) is a major poultry pathogen which causes severe economic losses in all the productive sectors. The prevalence of MS in European countries has increased in the last few years, leading to greater attention to the available methods to prevent its spread. The main strategy currently applied for its containment is the development and maintenance of MS-free breeder flocks. A live MS vaccine (MS-H) obtained by mutagenizing an Australian field strain has recently been introduced in Italy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the vaccine behaviour in broiler breeder groups at different production stages and the effectiveness of the available laboratory tests in discriminating the MS-H from a field strain.

Results

The vaccine diffused extensively through the population, shown by the wide serological response (over 80% of positive samples in RSA and 85% in ELISA), the high serological titres, the positivity of all the tracheal samples collected during the production phase by MS PCR and the positivity by cultivation from tracheal swabs at the end-point (55 weeks after vaccination). In contrast, only one swab from a sternal bursa was positive in MS PCR, while all the joint and oviduct samples were negative. There was no evidence of vertical transmission. Different genotyping techniques were used to achieve a clear classification of the MS positive samples. The vlhA and the obg gene analysis showed that most of the strains were homologous with the vaccine, but some ambiguous samples were further investigated with the multi locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme which confirmed the homology.

Conclusions

The development of a multi-technique approach to monitor vaccinated avian flocks, based both on serological and biomolecular methods, is advised as well as the use of effective genotyping techniques to analyse the MS strains circulating in high densely populated poultry areas.

Keywords

  • Mycoplasma synoviae
  • MS-H
  • Chicken breeder
  • Monitoring
  • Genotyping

Background

Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) is a major pathogen responsible for economic losses in the poultry industry [1]. Although the infection occurs as a subclinical respiratory disease most of the time [1], MS can spread systemically to the joints and tendons in meat turkeys and broiler chickens; recently it has also been associated with eggshell apex abnormalities (EAA) in laying hens [2, 3]. In mixed infections with Newcastle disease and infectious bronchitis, MS can be found in the lower parts of the respiratory system [1].

MS infection can occur as a result of either horizontal or vertical transmission and its worldwide prevalence appears to be increasing [4], including Italy [5]. MS infection often leads to severe economic losses due to reduced body weight, poor feed conversion rate, high carcasses condemnation and increased antibiotic treatment; moreover in case of EAA it can involve increased egg fragility, drop in egg production and reduction of the average egg weight [3].

The most effective control strategies are focused on the development and maintenance of MS-free breeder flocks, but in case of infection the interruption of the vertical transmission represents an important goal for the practitioner. In order to contain or to arrest the vertical diffusion of MS several methods are available. Firstly, where MS prevalence is low, the culling of breeder flocks is considered the most effective approach [6], but it is rarely applied because of the high cost. However, the production of a MS-positive offspring could have even worse economic consequences than those arising from the culling of breeder groups.

Two more methods may be applied in order to reduce MS vertical transmission: the vaccination of breeders [7] or the application of a targeted antibiotic pulsatile treatment [Catania, personal communication]. These approaches represent useful tools for the producers to contain the risk of MS spread to the offspring and consequently to lower its prevalence in a geographical area.

Recently, a live vaccine (MS-H) developed in Australia (Vaxsafe MSH; Bioproperties Ltd., Ringwood, Victoria, Australia) has been licensed in Italy. The MS-H vaccine is a temperature-sensitive variant obtained by mutagenizing an Australian field isolate with N-methyl-N9-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidina [8]. The MS-H safety and the temperature sensitivity of the strain have been previously examined [9], while the possible development of biomolecular tests for its differentiation is still under investigation [1012].

The availability of the vaccine in Italy and the producers’ need to better understand its behaviour in breeder flocks, as no previous report was available in this poultry sector, led to the development of a monitoring program of a vaccinated breeder group using samples collected for routine diagnostic purposes.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the MS-H vaccine under field conditions in:
  1. a)

    a chicken breeder group measuring immunity response, MS-H presence, maintenance and tissue localization;

     
  2. b)

    embryos evaluating MS-H presence and maintenance;

     
  3. c)

    1 day-old-chicks for serology.

     

In addition, several biomolecular techniques were applied to classify the MS positive samples and to confirm that the vaccine was the only strain circulating.

The development of a multi-technique scheme to distinguish the vaccine from the field strains circulating could be useful for Mycoplasma monitoring in breeders and especially in densely populated poultry areas (DPPAs).

Results

Breeders and MS-H vaccine

All the samples collected from the four barns 10 weeks after vaccination (14 weeks of age) were positive for MS in ELISA (40 positive samples out of 40), RSA (40 positive samples out of 40) and PCR (4 positive PCRs out of 4), confirming the correct application of the vaccination procedure. The ELISA titres were classified as positive in the 25% of the samples, as high positive in the 55% and as very high positive in the remaining 20% (Additional file 1).

Recovery, viability and tissue distribution of MS-H vaccine in breeders

All the tracheal samples collected in each barn during the production phase (at 25, 30, 38, 44, 49, 54 weeks of age) were positive for MS by PCR (Additional file 2).

Post mortem examination of the 10 carcasses per barn did not show gross pathological lesions of MS. Nevertheless, pathological findings were reported from the sternal bursa of birds in barn 1, 5 and 2 (18 sternal bursae). The lesions ranged from mild inflammatory signs to fibrinous exudate. Moreover, at least one bird in each barn showed swollen joints (tibio-tarsal and/or interphalangeal joints), which were associated to increased synovial fluid or sero-catharral exudate. The swabs collected from sternal bursae and joints were submitted for specific MS PCR or for Mycoplasma cultivation.

All the tracheal swabs collected during post mortem examinations were positive by MS PCR (Additional file 3). Mycoplasma cultivation from tracheal swabs was also positive, showing typical egg-fried colonies on solid medium; moreover the 16S-rDNA-PCR-DGGE identified these positive samples by cultivation as Mycoplasma synoviae. Oviduct swabs were negative by both PCR and cultivation. All the specimens collected from the joints were also negative both in PCR and in cultivation, while the sternal bursa swab of a bird (in barn 2) out of the 3 collected was positive by MS PCR (Additional file 3).

Assessment of vertical transmission of MS-H vaccine

A total of 150 embryonated eggs, collected at 30, 44, 49, 54 and 59 weeks, which correspond to the laying week 27, 41, 49, 51, 57, were negative for MS by isolation and specific PCR.

Genotyping of MS positive samples in breeders

The 55 MS positive samples, resulting from MS PCR and Mycoplasma cultivation, were further investigated by molecular typing of their vlhA gene. Based on the vlhA analysis most of the samples were identical to the MS-H vaccine, as they were classified as type C, subtype 3 and group 13. However, one tracheal sample from barn 1 and one from barn 4 were classified as type E, group 11 (Table 1).
Table 1

Genotyping results of MS strains; for lepA, nanA, ruvB, ugpA and uvrA genes the allelic profile is presented. The Genebank Accession Numbers for each gene and strain are reported between brackets (Wks p.v. = weeks post vaccination)

Sample ID

Wks p.v.

Barn

vlhA

obg

lepA

nanA

ruvB

ugpA

uvrA

IZSVE/2017/860

MS-H

Type C3, group 13

(KY991388)

MS-H

(KY991394)

2

(KY991412)

25 (KY991418)

19 (KY991430)

24 (KY991442)

21 (KY991454)

IZSVE/2013/2986–1

21

1

Type C3, group 13

(KY991382)

parental strain ts- (KY991400)

2

(KY991406)

25 (KY991424)

19

(KY991436)

24 (KY991448)

21 (KY991460)

IZSVE/2013/2986–4

21

4

Type C3, group 13

(KY991383)

reisolate ts- (KY991401)

2

(KY991407)

25

(KY991425)

19 (KY991437)

24 (KY991449)

21 (KY991461)

IZSVE/2013/4519–6

32

6

Type C3, group 13

(KY991384)

parental strain ts- (KY991402)

2

(KY991408)

25 (KY991426)

19 (KY991438)

24 (KY991450)

21 (KY991462)

IZSVE/2013/5404–6

40

6

Type C3, group 13

(KY991385)

MS-H (KY991403)

2

(KY991409)

25 (KY991427)

19 (KY991439)

24 (KY991451)

21 (KY991463)

IZSVE/2013/6965–6

50

6

Type C3, group 13 (KY991386)

parental strain ts- (KY991404)

2

(KY991410)

25 (KY991428)

19 (KY991440)

24 (KY991452)

21 (KY991464)

IZSVE/2014/368–2

55

2

Type C3, group 13 (KY991389)

MS-H (KY991395)

2

(KY991413)

25 (KY991419)

19 (KY991431)

24 (KY991443)

21 (KY991455)

IZSVE/2014/368–6

55

6

Type C3, group 13 (KY991390)

reisolate ts- (KY991396)

2

(KY991414)

25 (KY991420)

19 (KY991432)

24 (KY991444)

21 (KY991456)

IZSVE/2014/371–1

55

1

Type E, group 11 (KY991387)

reisolate ts- (KY991405)

2

(KY991411)

25 (KY991429)

19 (KY991441)

24 (KY991453)

21 (KY991465)

IZSVE/2014/373–12

55

3

Type C3, group 13 (KY991391)

parental strain ts- (KY991397)

2

(KY991415)

25 (KY991421)

19 (KY991433)

24

(KY991445)

21 (KY991457)

IZSVE/2014/374–12

55

4

Type E, group 11 (KY991393)

reisolate ts- (KY991399)

2

(KY991417)

25 (KY991423)

19

(KY991435)

24 (KY991447)

21 (KY991459)

IZSVE/2014/374–11

55

4

Type C3, group 13 (KY991392)

reisolate ts- (KY991398)

2

(KY991416)

25 (KY991422)

19 (KY991434)

24 (KY991446)

21 (KY991458)

Moreover, the sp0B-associated GTP binding gene (obg) of all the positive samples were sequenced and analysed in three nucleotide positions (pos. 178, 367 and 629). Briefly, the analysis of the point mutation in position 629 (C > T) reveal the transition from a C in the MS-H ts + strain to a T in a re-isolated ts- strain, which was detected for the first time at week 25 in barn 4. Moreover, reisolated ts- strains were detected in barn 1, 4, 5 and 6 at 59 weeks.

Based on the analysis of the obg gene [18, 19] in position 367 (A > G), 4 samples (at week 25 in barn 1, then at week 36 in barn 6, at week 50 in barn 6 and finally at week 59 in barn 3) were classified as parental strain ts- (a vaccine parent strain, non thermosusceptible). The vlhA gene of these 4 samples was previously defined as type C3, group 13 (Table 1).

In order to detect the presence of wild strains, 6 samples not clearly classified by previous methods were further investigated by MLST. Their MLST allelic profile (MLST ST) was identical to the MS-H vaccine, confirming that there was no other MS strain circulating during the field study (Table 1).

MS immunity in breeders and offspring

Just over 80% (666 of 840) of all tested samples were positive by the RSA. However, there were differences in the percentage of positive samples over time: week 25 (38%), 30 (80%), 38 (100%), 44 (62%), 49 (75%), 54 (100%) and 60 (100%). The ELISA results showed an evident seroconversion in the all tested samples (717 positive sample out of 840–85%), with modifications during the time week 25 (75%), 30 (100%), 38 (100%), 44 (83%), 49 (83%), 54 (83%) and 60 (85%) and between flocks (Table 2). The positive titres showed a wide range of distribution: most of the samples (65%) were classified as class A (positive), whereas the percentage of class B (high positive) was 32% and only 3% were included in the C class (very high positive). Four barns (2, 4, 5, and 6) showed very high positive titres and only barn 6 reached the 65% of positivity (C class). The mean titres are reported in Table 2.
Table 2

ELISA serological titres of breeder flocks represented in Number of Positive Samples (NPS) and percentage (%), the mean titre is reported above

 

Weeks of age

25th week

30th week

38th week

44th week

49th week

54th week

59th week

 

Barn

        

Total

1

NPS (%)

6 (30%)

20 (100%)

15 (75%)

16 (80%)

10 (50%)

10 (50%)

10 (50%)

87 (62%)

1

Mean titre

1653

5152

4430

2305

3599

4105

3577

4003

2

NPS (%)

18 (90%)

20 (100%)

10 (50%)

16 (80%)

10 (50%)

14 (70%)

16 (80%)

104 (74%)

2

Mean titre

1953

2886

2422

3948

2538

1783

2310

2633

3

NPS (%)

16 (80%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

18 (90%)

20 (100%)

134 (96%)

3

Mean titre

3938

4607

5853

2210

2837

2482

3271

3557

4

NPS (%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

18 (90%)

138 (99%)

4

Mean titre

3278

4616

3886

5236

2769

5314

2874

4105

5

NPS (%)

20 (20%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

12 (60%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

20

(100%)

132 (94%)

5

Mean titre

2739

3365

3561

2348

3391

4633

5802

3733

6

NPS (%)

10 (50%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

16 (80%)

20 (100%)

18 (90%)

18 (90%)

122 (87%)

6

Mean titre

14,583

4536

3668

2261

3327

6639

2473

4795

Total

90 (75%)

120 (100%)

105 (100%)

100 (83%)

100 (83%)

100 (83%)

102 (85%)

717 (85%)

Mean titre

4158

4193

4096

2849

3079

4291

3436

3753

About the 57% of sera from 1-day-old chicks was positive at the 3 sampling times (Table 3); all the positive samples showed titres below 4.000 (positive).
Table 3

Results of 1-day-old chicken sera tested in MS ELISA (chicks hatched from vaccinated birds), expressed as number of positive and negative samples and in percentage between brackets

Week of layed eggs

Samples number

Negative

Positive

Total

41

38 (63%)

22 (37%)

60

46

30 (75%)

10 (25%)

40

51

- (0%)

60 (100%)

60

Total

68 (43%)

92 (57%)

160

Discussion

The increasing prevalence of MS in many countries shows that this pathogen represents a persistent challenge for the poultry industry. The vertical transmission of MS can be considered a critical point to control its spread to the offspring. The control programs previously applied to the poultry industry have enabled the eradication of important Mycoplasma species, such as MG where a high reduction of prevalence has been achieved at least in the European countries, while sporadic outbreaks of Mycoplasma meleagridis and Mycoplasma iowae are occasionally reported in backyard flocks [14] and industrial turkeys respectively [24, 25]. The eradication measures commonly applied for Mycoplasma species seem to have been ineffective for MS which could be related to the lower attention paid up to now to this bacterial species. The implementation of biosecurity measures, the targeted antibiotic pulsatile treatment of breeders or the vaccination could be applied to reduce the spread of MS-positive offspring, without resorting to the cull of breeders.

The aim of this study was to analyse the MS vaccine behaviour (MS-H) in a broiler breeder farm with a high biosecurity level. In particular, it was directed to evaluate the laboratory tests available to screen the animals and to define correctly the sanitary status of breeder groups, which could also be useful for the authorization in intra-community exchanges (UE) of embryonated eggs or 1-day-old chicks (2009/158/CE).

The thermo-susceptible MS-H strain showed a wide diffusion in the breeder group confirmed by the positivity in PCR during the entire production period, in addition the wide spread of the strain, is confirmed by the serological data reported in this study, in which most of the tested population showed a strong seroconversion. It is interesting to highlight that while the MG vaccine (TS-11®) is produced with a similar technology to the MS-H, their serological behaviour looks different. Flocks vaccinated with TS-11® have a lower seroconversion rate of around 60% of birds as well as lower mean titres as compared to MS-H vaccinated flocks. As reported by Barbour et al. (2000) [26], the ELISA OD rate at the peak (23 weeks after vaccination with ts-11) was 46.6% in flock 1 and the TS-11® is not commonly recovered after the 30th week after vaccination. Actually, in the present study, the serum samples of birds in many barns (3, 4, 5, and 6) showed a100% positivity for MS with ELISA at different sampling times and the rate of positivity was particularly high in the last 30 weeks of production, while the MS-H vaccine was administered at 4 weeks of age. The positive titres were very high demonstrating a strong immune reaction against the vaccine.

This strong serological behaviour could be explained by the high MS-H persistence in the population and by its possible recirculation in the host, which provides a persistent immunogenic stimulus. This high seroconversion in breeders is then transferred to 1-day-old chicks, as MS antibodies were clearly detected in the offspring; but these findings should be confirmed by further studies on a larger number of samples. These preliminary results could represent a disadvantage for the trade in 1-day-old chicks, until a DIVA serological test is developed.

In addition, the vaccine strain was also highly persistent during the period of the study as it was still being isolated from the trachea of birds at the end of the cycle (55th weeks after vaccination). This strain seems to be able to recirculate inside the population and to maintain itself in the flock. This behaviour is similar to that expressed by wild strains, which are associated with positivity by PCR during the entire life of the breeders. It is evident that the PCR screening of tracheal swabs is not enough to discriminate a vaccinated group from an infected one and more discriminatory tests are required.

The long term persistence of the vaccine is confirmed by the culture method of MS from tracheal samples at the end of the cycle. The isolation of mycoplasma by cultural method demonstrates the viability of the strain and its presence in high quantity. The vaccine was isolated at the end of the cycle from the upper respiratory tract, whereas it is important to highlight that there was no evidence of MS in other target sites, such as oviduct and joint, and that one swab taken from an abnormal sternal bursa was positive in the MS PCR. The detection of MS DNA in the sternal bursa of one bird could be probably due to its spread within the body, but further studies are needed to confirm this data.

As only tracheal samples were positive by cultivation, the vaccine strain, unlike the wild types, seemed unable to colonize different tissues other than the upper respiratory tract.

These results confirm, as reported for the ts-11 vaccine [27], that the MS-H seemed incapable of spreading and colonizing the oviduct, which was also shown by the negative results of the oviducts and, therefore, of the embryonated eggs. The laboratory findings of the present study suggest that there was no vertical spread of the MS vaccine, but further large scale studies should be carried out in view of the recent reports of MG vaccine transmission in the USA [28].

The vlhA gene sequencing was applied as it is a helpful tool to classify different isolates and in some specific cases or geographic areas it could also be used to discriminate the vaccine from wild strains [21, 22]. Recently, the vlhA technique was not always found to be able to discriminate the vaccine in Italy [20], as a wild strain isolated in this geographical area showed complete homology to the MS-H in the vlhA gene sequence. An additional biomolecular test, based on the obg gene analysis [19, 29, 20] was introduced to classify all the positive samples as MS-H strain, MS-H reisolates (ts + and ts-) or parental strains ts-.

The analysis of the obg gene sequence defined most of the samples as MS-H, but it is important to highlight that some samples were classified as re-isolates ts-, confirming the possible lack of thermosusceptibility as previously reported by Noormohammadi et al. (2003) [30]. In the present study the single point mutation associated with the lack of thermosusceptibility was detected as early as week post vaccination (p.v.). 21 in barn 4 and then at 55 weeks p.v. in barn 1, 4, 5 and 6. It is interesting to report that the mutation in position 629 was not confirmed in each barn at every sampling time; for example in barn 4 the point mutation was not recovered until the end of the trial. These results suggest that the 2 vaccine types (MS-H ts + and reisolate ts-) could be present together in the population. It is important to report that from the 25th week (21 weeks after vaccination), at many sampling times, at least one ts- reisolate was detected in the six barns. Four MS positive samples, defined as type C3 group 13 for the vlhA gene, were classified as parental strain ts- based on the obg gene analysis.

Moreover, the analysis of 5 housekeeping genes basing on the MLST scheme [23] was applied in order to exclude an improper classification and the presence of any other strain circulating. The results confirmed the complete homology of all the samples, including the ambiguous ones, to the MS-H vaccine in all the 5 genes.

Based on the vlhA genotyping techniques [16, 17], all the strains were classified as type C, subtype 3 and group 13, which is the same genotype as the vaccine, with the exception of 2 samples (barn 1 and 3), which showed a different vlhA sequence classified as type E and group 11.

These data highlight the possible rearrangement of the vlhA gene, which is considered a common feature of Mycoplasma species [30, 31]. They also show that the MS-H vaccine was maintained in the avian group as a main population with the same vlhA sequence (type C3, group 13) and a minor population with a different vlhA type (type E, group 11). Moreover, it is important to emphasise that this mutated population was detected only in 2 samples by isolation and PCR and that the different vlhA type (type E, group 11) is the same previously reported by Bayatzdeh et al. (2014) [22] in a similar field trial. While few reports exist, studies have shown a change of the vlhA sequence in vaccinated birds and in both cases the same kind of genetic change was seen; thus it is possible to speculate that MS possesses a specific and organized ability to rearrange genetic segments the vlhA gene [30]. Of course further studies are necessary to substantiate this hypothesis.

Conclusions

The MS-H vaccine showed a wide diffusion and a great persistence in the groups, evidenced by a clear and high seroconversion of the vaccinated chickens and their progeny comparable to the behaviour of the wild strain. The vlhA method alone seems not always effective in discriminating the vaccine from wild strains, as recently reported by Catania et al. (2016) [20]; in fact two samples were classified as type E – group 11, instead of type C3 - group 13. In a similar way, the obg gene analysis was not always successful in the definition of the vaccine or wild strain, as the four samples classified as parental strain ts- showed complete homology to the MS-H vaccine ST, based on the MLST scheme.

Moreover, no clinical or pathological signs characteristics of MS infection were found during the whole production cycle. Consequently, based on these results, the use of the obg gene for the MS-H vaccine seems insufficiently discriminatory and up to now the application of different biomolecular techniques together could represent an effective laboratory system to monitor vaccinated populations.

The development and validation of biomolecular and serological DIVA methods, as well as genotyping studies on the MS population in DPPAs, are strongly desirable to improve monitoring laboratory activities on avian flocks.

Methods

Site description and history

A broiler chicken breeder farm, with high biosecurity measures, in a DPPA in Italy was the target of the present study. The farm had been monitored for Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) for several years before the study started and was shown to be MG-free, whereas there had been periodic outbreaks of MS.

The samples (sera, tracheal swabs and carcasses) were sent to the Avian Medicine Laboratory of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe, Legnaro – Padova, Italy) for diagnostic and monitoring purposes and, in agreement with the farmer, were used for further investigations of MS.

Breeders and MS-H vaccine

Approximately 28,000 one-day-old chicks (mixed-sex) were bought as MG- and MS-free. They were allocated to separate farm and into 4 different barns: 3 female barns (2 b with chicks of Ross genetic line and 1 b with chicks of Cobb genetic line) and 1 male barn in 2-floor pens with mixed genetics, until transfer to the production site, which took place at 23rd week of age.

Before MS-H vaccination, birds were monitored serologically and by PCR to exclude the presence of MS infection. 30 MS ELISA (Idexx® USA), 30 rapid serum agglutination (RSA) tests (IDVET, Montpellier) [6] and 30 MS PCRs [13] on tracheal swabs were performed on randomly selected birds in each barn. At 4 weeks of age all the birds were vaccinated for MS with MS-H vaccine (Vaxsafe MSH; Bioproerties Ltd., Ringwood, Victoria, Australia) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Ten weeks after the MS-H vaccination (14 weeks of age), 10 randomly selected birds in each barn were monitored serologically and by PCR comprising each barn 10 MS ELISA, 10 MS RSA and 10 tracheal swabs for MS PCR, for a total amount of 40 MS ELISA, 40 MS RSA and 4 MS PCR.

The production farm (from weeks 23rd to 59th) consisted of 6 b of broiler breeders: barn 1 and 2 housed birds of the Cobb genetic, whereas barns 3, 4, 5 and 6 held Ross 308 chicks. The organization of the animal housing and the protocols applied are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the animal housing and the protocols applied during the study

Recovery, viability and tissue distribution of MS-H vaccine in breeders

At the 23rd week of age, animals were moved to the production farm and divided in 6 groups as previously described.

Animals of each barn were monitored at fixed times: 25, 30, 38, 44, 49, 54 and 59 weeks of age. At every time interval, 10 tracheal swabs/barn were sent to the IZSVe for specific MS PCR [13].

At 59 weeks of age, basing on the farmer’s standards for animals kept commercially, the production period was considered finished and all the animals were sent to the abattoir, where a properly approved stunning and killing method was applied in respect of the nationally implemented EU legislation.

Then, for each barn ten animal carcasses were sent to the IZSVe for complete post mortem examination, particularly directed to the detection of MS. For each barn, 10 tracheal and 10 oviduct swabs were collected during necropsy for specific MS PCR and cultivation. Additional samples were collected when gross pathological lesions characteristic of MS were found in target organs (i.e. air sacs, tibio-tarsal joints, sternal bursa). Consequently, 3 abnormal sternal bursa and 11 joints were tested either by PCR or Mycoplasma spp. cultivation.

DNA was extracted from the collected specimens using QIAmp® DNA mini kit (Qiagen®) and tested by a specific MS PCR [13].

Furthermore, swabs were submitted for Mycoplasma spp. isolation in Mycoplasma Experience (ME) broth medium (Reigate, UK) following the internal laboratory procedure and incubated at 37 °C under CO2 conditions for at least 15 days. Briefly, during this time the cultures were checked daily and when a change in colour or turbidity was seen, the broth was inoculated onto an agar plate (ME, Reigate, UK) to evidence the presence of typical egg-fried colonies [14]. The inoculated agar plates were checked for 15 days and considered negative if no sign of growth was seen after this period of time [14]. DNA was extracted from broths of suspect samples using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche®) and Mycoplasma species identification was performed with the 16S-rDNA-PCR-DGGE (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) [15].

Assessment of vertical transmission of MS-H vaccine

When broiler breeders were 30, 44, 49, 54, 59 weeks of age 30 embryonated eggs were collected and tested for MS by isolation and specific MS PCR. The specimens collected from the embryos were swabs of the internal surface of the yolk sac and the trachea, which were analysed in pool of 10 samples for Mycoplasma spp. cultivation and specific MS PCR, as previously described.

Genotyping of MS positive samples in breeders

As the present study was carried out in a commercial farm, two main genotyping methods were applied to all the MS positive samples to confirm that the vaccine was the only strain circulating. These samples were analysed in the variable lipoprotein hemagglutinin A (vlhA) gene [16, 17] and the sp0B-associated GTP binding globulin gene (obg) [18, 19]. Where the vlhA and obg gene analysis led to ambiguous results, samples were further investigated by multi locus sequence typing scheme (MLST) of 5 specific housekeeping genes [23]. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study and the amplification product size are reported in Table 4. The positive PCR products were purified using the A’SAP PCR clean up kit following the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced in both directions using the dye terminator sequencing method. The sequences were analysed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis6 (MEGA6) software.
Table 4

Gene targets and primer details

Gene target

Primer forward

Primer reverse

PCR amplicon size (bp)

vlhA

5′-ATT AGC AGC TAG TGC AGT GGC C-3’

5′-AGT AAC CGA TCC GCT TAA TGC-3’

315–372

obg

5′-GTT GAT AAA GGT GGA CCA G − 3′

5′-TTA GTG CAG ATA TCT CAA TG-3’

841

nanA

5’-TTGAAAAACAAAAAGTTGATGGAA-3′

5’-ATGATTGCATTAGCGCCTTT-3’

544–559

ugpA

5’-TTAGATTTGCAATCGGTTTTAGA-3′

5’-CCGCGTCAGTTGGACTATTT-3’

537

ruvB

5’-GAATGCCTGGAATGGGTAAA-3’

5’-TGTCAATGATTCCAGCGTTT-3’

546

lepA

5’-AGCGCCGATGTTGAYAGAGT-3’

5’-GAGTGCTTCTTTGGCTGGAT-3’

462

uvrA

5’-CKGCAAACATGGTTTCTTCG-3’

5’-TGGGTTCTTTTACATGCGGTA-3’

468

MS immunity in breeders and offspring

At fixed times (25, 30, 38, 44, 49, 54 and 59 weeks of age) 20 blood samples from each barn were collected and analysed at the IZSVe for specific MS serology. Blood samples were tested for MS ELISA and Rapid Serum Agglutination (RSA) as above. Concerning the MS ELISA, positive titres were classified as A: positive titre of < 4.000 OD (low positive), B: positive titre < 10.000 OD (high positive) and C positive titre > 10.000 OD (very high positive). Since the monitoring programs are not commonly applied to 1-day-old chicks, a small number of serum samples (160 sera from chicks hatched from vaccinated birds) were randomly collected from several barns and tested in MS ELISA. The time of collection was 41, 46 and 51 weeks of age of the breeders.

Abbreviations

DGGE: 

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

DPPAs: 

Densely Populated Poultry Areas

EAA: 

Eggshell Apex Abnormalities

IB: 

Infectious Bronchitis

IZSVe: 

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie

ME: 

Mycoplasma Experience

MEGA: 

Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis

MG: 

Mycoplasma gallisepticum

MLST: 

Multi Locus Sequence Typing

MS: 

Mycoplasma synoviae

MS-H: 

Mycoplasma synoviae vaccine

ND: 

Newcastle Disease

obg: 

sp0B-associated GTP binding globulin gene

OD: 

Optical Density

RSA: 

Rapid Serum Agglutination test

vlhA: 

variable lipoprotein haemagglutinin A

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with the Project RC IZSVE 15/10 “Le micoplasmosi nel settore avicolo industriale: studio e messa a punto di nuove metodiche e protocolli diagnostici al fine di valutare e studiare il differente ruolo dei ceppi circolanti tra le differenti tipologie di produzioni avicole”.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Nucleotide sequences generated during this study are available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/, the Accession numbers for each gene and strain are specified in Table 1. Raw data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ML-M gave support during necroscopies and carried out biomolecular tests and sequencing analysis; M-C contributed in data analysis and in writing the manuscript; F-G carried out the necroscopies, the diagnosis and isolation of Mycoplasma synoviae; M-M contributed in data analysis and in writing the manuscript; G-F performed the activities in the field and reported the anamnestic information and the follow-up of the groups; S-C performed the study design, supervised the activities during necropsies and managed the additional tests performed. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is not required to use animal specimens received for diagnostic purpose. In detail, all the samples that contributed to this study were collected for the routine MG monitoring of the avian groups of the farm. Samples were received at the Avian Medicine Laboratory of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (Legnaro – Padova, Italy) for analysis and, in agreement with the farmer, were used for the further investigations and analysis on Mycoplasma synoviae, which are reported in the present research paper.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health - MAPS, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020. Legnaro, Padova, Italy
(2)
Avian Medicine Laboratory Mycoplasma Unit - SCT1, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020. Legnaro, Padova, Italy
(3)
Veterinary practitioner. Avicola Alimentare Monteverde SRL. Via San Donato, 107, 25038. Rovato, Brescia, Italy
(4)
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Verona, SCT1, Via S. Giacomo 5, 37135 Verona, Italy

References

  1. Kleven SH, Ferguson-Noel N. Mycoplasma synoviae infection. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, LR MD, Nolan LK, Suarez DL, Nair V, editors. Disease of poultry. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 900–6.Google Scholar
  2. Feberwee A, de Wit JJ, Landman WJ. Induction of eggshell apex abnormalities by Mycoplasma synoviae: field and experimental studies. Avian Pathol. 2009;38:77–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Catania S, Bilato D, Gobbo F, Granato A, Terregino C, Iob L, Nicholas RA. Treatment of eggshell abnormalities and reduced egg production caused by mycoplasma synoviae infection. Avian Dis. 2010;54:961–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Landman WJ. Is Mycoplasma synoviae outrunning Mycoplasma gallisepticum? A viewpoint from the Netherlands. Avian Pathol. 2014;43:2–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania S, Gobbo F, Bilato D, Gagliazzo L, Moronato ML, Terregino C, Bradbury JM, Ramirez AS. Two strains of mycoplasma synoviae from chicken flocks on the same layer farm differ in their ability to produce eggshell apex abnormality. Vet Microbiol. 2016;193:60–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kleven SH. Control of avian mycoplasma infections in commercial poultry. Avian Dis. 2008;42:367–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Feberwee A, Morrow CJ, Ghorashi SA, Noormohammadi AH, Landman WJ. Effect of a live Mycoplasma synoviae vaccine on the production of eggshell apex abnormalities induced by a M. synoviae infection preceded by an infection with infectious bronchitis virus D1466. Avian Pathol. 2009;38:333–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrow CJ, Markham JF, Whithear KG. Production of temperature-sensitive clones of Mycoplasma synoviae for evaluation as live vaccines. Avian Dis. 1998;42:667–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Noormohammadi AH, Jones JF, Harrigan KE, Whithear KG. Evaluation of the non-temperature-sensitive field clonal isolates of the mycoplasma synoviae vaccine strain MS-H. Avian Dis. 2003;47:355–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhu L, Konsak BM, Olaogun OM, Agnew-Crumptona R, Kanci A, Marenda MS, Browning GF, Noormohammadi AH. Identification of a new genetic marker in mycoplasma synoviae vaccine strain MS-H and development of a strategy using polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution melting curve analysis for differentiating MS-H from field strains. Vet Microbiol. 2017;210:49–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreizinger Z, Sulyok KM, Grózner D, Bekő K, Dán Á, Szabó Z, Gyuranecz M. Development of mismatch amplification mutation assays for the differentiation of MS1 vaccine strain from wild-type mycoplasma synoviae and MS-H vaccine strains. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175969.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkman R, Feberwee A, Landman WJM. Development, validation and field evaluation of a quantitative real-time PCR able to differentiate between field mycoplasma synoviae and the MS-H-live vaccine strain. Avian Pathol. 2017;46(4):403–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2017.1296105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lauerman LH, Hoerr FJ, Sharpton AR, Shah SM, van Santen VL. Development and application of a polymerase chain reaction assay for mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Dis. 1993;37:829–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Catania S, Rodio S, Moronato ML, Ayling RD, Nicholas RAJ. Outbreak of disease associated with mycoplasma meleagridis in a free-range mixed poultry farm. Vet Rec Cas Rep. 2014. https://vetrecordcasereports.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000107.info.
  15. McAuliffe L, Ellis RJ, Lawes JR, Ayling RD, Nicholas RA. 16S rDNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; a single generic test for detecting and differentiating mycoplasma species. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:731–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bencina D, Dobnic VM, Horvat S, Narat M, Kleven SH, Dovc P. Molecular basis of the length variation in the N-terminal part of mycoplasma synoviae haemagglutinin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;203:115–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammond PP, Ramirez AS, Morrow CJ, Bradbury JM. Development and evaluation of an improved diagnostic PCR for mycoplasma synoviae using primers located in the haemaagglutinin encoding gene vlhA and its value for strain typing. Vet Microbiol. 2009;136:61–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shahid M, Markham PF, Markham JF, Marenda MS, Noormohammadi AH. Mutations in GTP binding protein obg of mycoplasma synoviae vaccine strain MS-H: implications intemperature sensitivity phenotype. PLOSOne. 2013;8(9):e73954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073954.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Shahid MA, Markham PF, Marenda MS, Agnew-Crumpton R, Noormohammadi AH. High-resolution melting-curve analysis of obg gene to differentiate the temperature-sensitive mycoplasma synoviae vaccine strain MS-H from non-temperature-sensitive strains. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Catania S, Gobbo F, Ramirez AS, Guadagnini D, Baldasso E, Moronato ML, Nicholas RAJ. Laboratory investigations into the origin of mycoplasma synoviae isolated from a lesser flamingo (Phoeniconaias minor). BMC Vet Res. 2016;12:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0680-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogino S, Munakata Y, Ohashi S, Masato F, Sakamoto H, Sekiya Y, Noormohammadi AH, Morrow C. Genotyping of Japanese field isolates of mycoplasma synoviae and rapid molecular differentiation from the MS-H vaccine strain. Avian Dis. 2011;55:187–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bayatzadeh MA, Pourbakhsh SA, Ashtari A, Abtin AR, Abdoshas M. Molecular typing of Iranian field isolates mycoplasma synoviae and their differentiation from the live commercial vaccine strain MS-H using vlhA gene. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55:148–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dijkman R, Feberwee A, Landman JM. Development and evaluation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme for mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Pathol. 2016;45:426–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Catania S, Gobbo F, Bilato D, Fincato A, Battanolli G, Iob L. Isolation of Mycoplasma iowae in commercial turkey flocks. Vet Rec. 2012;170:107–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ley DH, Marusak RA, Vivas EJ, Barnes HJ, Fletcher OJ. Mycoplasma iowae associated with chondrodystrophy in commercial turkeys. Avian Pathol. 2010;39:87–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Markham JF, Scott PC, Whithear KG. Field evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a temperature-sensitive mycoplasma synoviae live vaccine. Avian Dis. 1998;42:682–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Barbour EK, Hamadeh SK, Eid A. Infection and immunity in broiler chickens breeders vaccinated with temperature-sensitive mutant of mycoplasma gallisepticum and impact on performance of offspring. Poult Sci. 2000;79:1730–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferguson-Noel NM, Williams SM. The efficacy of mycoplasma gallisepticum K-strain live vaccine in broiler and layer chickens. Avian Pathol. 2015;44:75–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kreizinger Z, Sulyok KM, Pásztor A, Erdélyi K, Felde O, Povazsán J, Kőrösi L, Gyuranecz M. Rapid, simple and cost-effective molecular method to differentiate the temperature sensitive (ts+) MS-H vaccine strain and wild-type mycoplasma synoviae isolates. PLoS One. 2015. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133554.
  30. Noormohammadi AH, Markham PF, Kanci A, Whithear KG, Browning GF. A novel mechanism for control of antigenic variation in the haemagglutinin gene family of mycoplasma synoviae. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:911–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Delaney NF, Balenger S, Bonneaud C, Marx CJ, Hill GE, Ferguson-Noel N, Tsai P, Rodrigo A, Edwards SV. Ultrafast Evolution and Loss of CRISPRs following a host shift in a novel wildlife pathogen, Mycoplasma gallisepticum. PLoS Genet 2012;8(3): doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/b5608bc6-aa54-40a7-b246-51fa7bc4a9db.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement