Open Access

Rumen-derived lipopolysaccharide enhances the expression of lingual antimicrobial peptide in mammary glands of dairy cows fed a high-concentrate diet

  • Di Jin1,
  • Guangjun Chang1,
  • Kai Zhang1,
  • Junfei Guo1,
  • Tianle Xu1 and
  • Xiangzhen Shen1Email author
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201612:128

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0755-z

Received: 27 October 2015

Accepted: 23 June 2016

Published: 27 June 2016

Abstract

Background

Long-term high-concentrate diet (HCD) feeding can cause subacute ruminal acidosis in cows and subsequently trigger systemic inflammatory and immune responses. Therefore, we conducted the present study in which twelve lactating cows installed with ruminal fistula were randomly assigned to the HCD group (forage:concentrate = 4:6, n = 6) or the low-concentrate diet (LCD) group (forage:concentrate = 6:4, n = 6) and were fed for 20 weeks. Ruminal fluid, plasma and mammary gland tissue samples were collected at week 20 for analysing lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pro-inflammatory cytokines, and immune relevant gene expression. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rumen-derived LPS on lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP) synthesis and immune responses in mammary glands of lactating cows fed a HCD.

Results

Compared with the LCD group, the ruminal pH was lower in the HCD group, while LPS concentrations in the rumen, lacteal artery and vein were higher. The expression of LAP, BNBD5, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF–α was enhanced in the HCD group. LAP protein expression was higher in the HCD group than that in the LCD group. The expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-кB) did not change, but was activated, as the amounts of phosphorylated NF-kB and phosphorylated inhibitory kBα increased in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group.

Conclusions

After long-term HCD feeding, rumen-derived LPS translocated to the blood stream, triggered inflammatory and immune responses and enhanced LAP synthesis via the NF-kB signalling pathway in mammary glands of lactating cows.

Keywords

High-concentrate diet Lipopolysaccharide Lingual antimicrobial peptide Mammary gland Cow

Background

Long-term consumption of a high-concentrate diet (HCD), which occurs to meet the energy requirements for high milk yields, is hazardous to the health of ruminants. The consumption of a HCD causes the accumulation of organic acid and a decrease in pH values in the rumen [1]. When the ruminal pH decreases below 5.6 for more than 3 h per day, subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) occurs [2], and free LPS is released from Gram-negative bacteria and is translocated into the circulatory system across the epithelial barrier of the gastrointestinal tract [3, 4]. Subsequently, LPS initiates systemic inflammatory responses [3, 5, 6] and host innate immune responses [7] because the circulating LPS stimulates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by monocytes, macrophages and vascular cells [8]. The release of LPS and cytokines results in enhanced secretion of several antimicrobial peptides, such as lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP), in mammary epithelial cells (MECs) [9].

LAP, which was first found in inflamed bovine tongue epithelium [10], is a type of β-defensin that often exists in epithelial cells when inflammation occurs. Defensins contribute to innate immunity and are effective against a broad spectrum of microorganisms [11]. Other previously identified bovine β-defensins include tracheal antimicrobial peptide, bovine neutrophil β-defensin (BNBD), enteric β-defensin, and many other types of bovine β-defensins [1215]. The localization of LAP in MECs has been reported [9]; its expression is constitutive [16], such as in healthy [17], involuted [18], E.coli-challenged [19] or Streptococcus uberis-challenged [20] mammary gland tissues. LAP is also secreted from the alveolar epithelium into milk in healthy [21] and LPS-challenged [22] udders. One study demonstrated that the level and kinetics of the mRNA concentrations of LAP in E. coli-challenged MECs were associated with induction time but were independent of the pathogen dose [23]. Furthermore, Liu et al. [24] demonstrated that the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) plays a stimulatory role while C/EBPβ have a repressive function in LAP expression, and mutations of the binding sites for these two transcription factors abrogated LAP expression in MECs. Some reports also found widespread LAP mRNA expression in infected bovine digestive tract mucosal and respiratory tissues [25, 26]. These results strongly indicated that LAP plays a crucial role in the innate immune response.

The effects of a HCD on gastrointestinal tract or mammary gland health have received increasing attention [27, 28]. The relationship between LAP synthesis and immune responses in mammary glands of dairy cows intramammary stimulated by LPS or pathogens has been described previously. However, the effect of rumen-derived LPS caused by a HCD on LAP synthesis and immune responses in mammary glands of cows remains unknown. Furthermore, the mechanism of this effect remains to be clarified. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of rumen-derived LPS on LAP synthesis and immune responses in mammary glands of cows fed a HCD.

Methods

Animals, diet and experimental design

Twelve multiparous mid-lactating Holstein cows (Purchased from the Experimental Farm of Nanjing Agricultural University, average body weight, 455 ± 28 kg) fitted with ruminal fistula were randomly assigned into two groups: the high-concentrate diet (HCD) group (forage:concentrate = 4:6, n = 6) as the treatment group and the low concentrate diet (LCD) group (forage:concentrate = 6:4, n = 6) as the control group (fed for 20 weeks). Dietary ingredients and nutrient compositions, which were published previously [29], are presented in Table 1. The experimental cows were housed in individual tie-stalls at the Dairy Farm of Nanjing Agricultural University (Nanjing, China). Cows were fed three times daily at 04:00, 12:00, and 20:00 h and were allowed free access to fresh water throughout the experiment. All of the cows received LCD for 4 weeks (as an adaption period) before the formal experiment to ensure the similarity of their metabolic status.
Table 1

Ingredients and nutrient composition of the experimental diets

Ingredients, % of DM

Percentage (%)of ingredients (dry matter)

LCD1

HCD1

 Corn silage

30.00

20.00

 Alfalfa hay

30.00

20.00

 Maize

22.78

33.6

 Wheat bran

5.15

15

 Soybean meal

9.81

9

 Calcium phosphate dibasic

0.92

0.53

 Powder

0

0.52

 Salt

0.35

0.35

 Premix2

1

1

 Total

100

100

 Forage:concentrate

6:4

4:6

Nutritional composition3

 Net energy, MJ/kg

6.32

6.74

 CP, %

16

16.2

 EE, %

3.96

4.15

 NDF, %

37.71

31.92

 ADF, %

22.75

17.55

 NFC, %

32.43

40.31

 Ca, %

0.9

0.8

 P, %

0.45

0.45

1 LCD, low-concentrate diet; HCD, high-concentrate diet

2 The premix contained VA,1,900kU/kg; VD, 250kU/kg; VE, 3000 mg/kg; niacin, 4000 mg/kg; Cu, 1200 mg/kg; Fe, 525 mg/kg; Zn, 13,000 mg/kg; Mn, 5500 mg/kg; I, 170 mg/kg; Co, 50 mg/kg; Se, 27 mg/kg

3 The calculated nutritional composition values

Sample collection

Cows were milked at 05:00, 13:00, and 21:00 h, and milk yield was recorded daily. Milk samples were collected to measure the somatic cell count (SCC) (MilkoScan FT1, FOSS, Denmark) once a week. Ruminal fluid samples were collected via the ruminal fistula for 3 consecutive days during the 18th week, at 2-h intervals starting at 04:00 h (after the morning feeding) for 12 h. The collected ruminal fluid samples were filtered through 2 layers of gauze. Rumen fluid samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 45 min, and then the supernatant was aspirated and passaged through a disposable 0.22-μm filter. The filtrate was collected in a sterile, depyrogenated glass tube (previously heated at 250 °C for 2 h) and heated at 100 °C for 30 min. Samples were cooled at room temperature for 15 min and stored at—20 °C for subsequent LPS measurements. Blood samples were collected at 4 h after feeding on the sampling day of the 18th week. The samples were obtained via the lacteal artery and vein with 5-mL vacuum tubes containing sodium heparin. Samples were kept on ice until transported to the laboratory. Plasma was isolated from blood samples by centrifugation at 1469× g at 4 °C for 15 min and then stored at −20 °C for LPS, enzyme, and cytokine analyses. Mammary gland tissue samples were obtained by biopsy on the sampling day from the same quarter of the mammary gland [19]. Samples were rinsed with 0.9 % saline, fixed in 4 % (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for immunohistochemistry, or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −70 °C for RNA and protein extraction. Incisions were sutured, and antibiotics were administered intramuscularly to avoid infection.

Ruminal pH, ruminal and plasma LPS

The ruminal pH values were measured with a pH metre immediately after collecting ruminal fluid. The concentration of LPS in ruminal fluid (CE64406) and plasma (CE80545) samples was determined by a chromogenic endpoint assay (Chinese Horseshoe Crab Reagent Manufactory Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China) with a minimum detection limit of 0.05 EU/mL (ruminal liquid) or 0.01 EU/mL (plasma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Pro-inflammatory enzyme activity and cytokine concentrations

The analyses of the myeloperoxidase (MPO) and β-N-acetyl glucosaminidase (NAG) concentrations were performed using commercial kits (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute of Nanjing, Nanjing, China) that used an enzymatic colorimetric detection method read by a microplate reader (Epoch, BioTek, USA) [29]. Plasma IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α concentrations were determined using commercial radioimmunoassay kits (Beijing North Institute of Biological Technology, Beijing, China) and a gamma radioimmunoassay counter (SN-6105, Hesuo Rihuan Photoelectric Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). All of the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of mammary gland tissue samples using RNAiso Plusreagent (TaKaRa Co., Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of the total RNA were assessed by a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf Biotechnology, Hamburg, Germany). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized using 250 ng of the total RNA template and a PrimeScript RT Master Mix Perfect Real Time Kit (TaKaRa Co., Otsu, Japan). The primers for the target genes were designed based on known cattle sequences using Primer Premier Software 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, USA);these primers are shown in Table 2. The qPCR was performed on an ABI 7300 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using a SYBR Premix Ex TaqKit (TaKaRa Co., Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used to analyse the qPCR data, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal reference.
Table 2

The primer sequences of target and internal reference genes used in qPCR

Gene

Forward primer

Reverse primer

GenBank accession

PCR products

LAP

AGGCTCCATCACCTGCTCCTT

CCTGCAGCATTTTACTTGGGCT

AY911374.1

183 bp

BNBD5

CTGGATCACCTGCTCCTCGT

GGTGCCAATCTGTCTCATGTTG

NM_001130761.1

150 bp

IL-1β

GGCCAAAGTCCCTGACCTCT

CTGCCACCATCACCACATTC

NM_174093.1

167 bp

IL-6

GGAGGAAAAGGACGGATGCT

GGTCAGTGTTTGTGGCTGGA

NM_173923.2

227 bp

IL-8

CCTCTTGTTCAATATGACTTCCA

GGCCCACTCAATAACTCTC

NM_173925.2

170 bp

TNF-α

CTTCTGCCTGCTGCACTTCG

GAGTTGATGTCGGCTACAACG

AF_348421.1

156 bp

NF-kB

ATACGTCGGCCGTGTCTAT

GGAACTGTGATCCGTGTAG

NM_001045868.1

129 bp

GAPDH

GGGTCATCATCTCTGCACCT

GGTCATAAGTCCCTCCACGA

XM_001252479

177 bp

Immunohistochemical analysis of LAP

Mammary gland tissue samples for immunohistochemical analysis were fixed in 4 % (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS, dehydrated and processed for paraffin sectioning (4 μm thick). Oven-dried sections were deparaffinised, followed by antigen retrieval by microwaving in EDTA buffer, and treated with 3 % H2O2 for 10 min to block the endogenous peroxidase. The sections were washed in PBS after each step. Then, the air-dried sections were blocked within 5 % BSA for 20 min followed by incubation with rabbit anti-LAP antibody (kindly provided by Isobe N [17], 2 mg/mL) in PBS with 0.5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) overnight at 4 °C. After the sections were washed in PBS, they were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody using a REAL EnVision +/HRP Rabbit/Mouse Kit (Dako, Denmark) for 50 min at 4 °C, followed by washing in PBS. The products were visualized by incubating the sections with a diaminobenzidine (DAB) reaction mixture. The sections were then counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated and covered. Images were recorded by Nikon H550Smicroscope and NIS Elements F 3.0 software.

Western blot analysis

Total protein from 100 mg of mammary gland tissue was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and the concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (BCA) kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The proteins were fractionatedby sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio Trace, Pall Co., USA). After the membranes were blocked with 5 % BSA at room temperature for 2 h, they were incubated with anti-LAP (1 μg/mL), anti-phospho-NF-kB p65 (Ser536) (Beyotime,Shanghai, China, 1:1000), or anti-phospho-IkB-α (Ser36/Ser32) (Signalway Antibody, LLC., Maryland, USA, 1:1000) at 4 °C overnight. Then, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (E030130-01, Earth Ox, CA, 1:10000) at room temperature for 1 h. Antibodies directed against β-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., 1:200) and GAPDH (Beyotime, Shanghai, China, 1:500) were used as internal controls for normalization. The membrane was washed, and the target proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) using a BeyoECL Plus Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). ECL signals were recorded by an imaging system (Fujifilm, Japan) and analysed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA). The membranes containing phospho-NF-kB p65 and phospho-IkBα were stripped by stripping buffer (Boster Biotechnology, Inc., Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated with antibodies directed against NF-kB p65 and IkB-α (Beyotime,Shanghai, China, 1:500), respectively. Then, the steps were followed as described above.

Statistical analysis

The data of LPS concentrations of the rumen and lacteal artery and vein, as well as the concentrations of pro-inflammatory enzymes and cytokines in the lacteal vein plasma, were analysed using a MIXED model with repeated measures using SPSS Statistics (IBM, Inc., New York, USA). The data of the rumen pH values, the mRNA and protein expressions were analysed using the paired t-test. The correlations between the LAP mRNA expression and the protein expression were analysed using Pearson’s model. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 or highly significant if p < 0.01, and a tendency was considered if 0.05 < p < 0.10.

Results

Ruminal pH and LPS content

The mean pH value of ruminal fluid in the HCD group was lower than that in the LCD group (p < 0.05) and was lower than 5.6 for more than 3 h per day (Table 3).
Table 3

Ruminal pH and LPS content in rumen samples and in plasma samples from the lacteal artery and vein

Item

Treatment

SEM

p value

LCD

HCD

Mean pH value

6.02

5.90

0.03

0.03

Time < pH 5.6, h/d

1.65

3.72

0.50

0.01

LPS in rumen, kEU/mL

47.17

79.04

7.94

<0.01

LPS in plasma of lacteal artery, EU/mL

0.47

0.86

0.06

<0.01

LPS in plasma of lacteal vein, EU/mL

0.12

0.27

0.03

<0.01

The LPS concentration in rumen samples was higher in the HCD group than that in the LCD group at 4 h after feeding (p < 0.01). The plasma LPS concentrations in the lacteal artery and vein increased in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group (p < 0.01 for both, Table 3).

Evaluation of MPO activity, NAG activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations

The MPO activity in the mammary tissue and the lacteal vein plasma in the HCD group was up-regulated compared with the LCD group as shown in Fig. 1a and b (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively).
Fig. 1

Effect of a HCD on MPO activity, NAG activity, and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations. a MPO activity in the mammary gland tissue. b MPO activity in the lacteal vein plasma. c NAG activity in the lacteal vein plasma. d IL-1β concentration in the lacteal vein plasma. e IL-6 concentration in the lacteal vein plasma. f TNF-α concentration in the lacteal vein plasma. Significant difference is indicated (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)

The NAG activity in the lacteal vein plasma in the HCD group was higher than that in the LCD group (Fig. 1c, p < 0.01).

The concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in plasma from the lacteal vein increased in the HCD group compared with the LCD group (Fig. 1d, e, f, p < 0.05 for IL-1β and IL-6, p < 0.01 for TNF-α).

Expression of immune-related genes in the mammary gland

The mRNA analysis showed that the expression of LAP, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α increased in the HCD group compared with the LCD group (p < 0.05, Fig. 2). However, no significant difference but a up-regulated tendency for BNBD5 expression was observed (Fig. 2). The expression of the transcription factor NF-kB, which is implicated in regulating inflammatory and immune responses, did not differ between the HCD group and the LCD group (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Quantitative real-time PCR. Quantification of the mRNA expression involved in immune and inflammatory responses in mammary glands of dairy cows fed a LCD or HCD. Single asterisk (*) indicates p < 0.05

Immunohistochemical analysis of LAP

Positive immunoreactions of LAP in the HCD group were observed in the cytoplasm of mammary gland alveolar epithelium cells (Fig. 3b). Sections from the LCD group and the control sections incubated with normal rabbit IgG, which was substituted for LAP antibody, did not show positive reactions (Fig. 3a and c).
Fig. 3

Sections of mammary gland immunostained for LAP (×400). a Alveolar epithelial cells from the LCD group that are immunonegative for LAP. b Alveolar epithelial cells from the HCD group that are immunopositive for LAP. Arrows show positive immunoreactions for LAP. c Alveoli cultured with normal rabbit IgG as controls for LAP

LAP protein expression

LAP protein expression in mammary gland was up-regulated in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group (Fig. 4a and b). In addition, individual relative LAP protein expression with its corresponding mRNA relative copy numbers showed a strong correlation (r 2 = 0.85, p < 0.01, Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4

Effect of a HCD on LAP protein expression in mammary gland. a Western blot results of LAP and β- tubulin proteins (Bands 1-4 represent LCD group samples, while bands 5–8 represent HCD group samples). b The mean relative protein expression of LAP against the reference β-tubulin protein as quantified by band density. Significant difference is indicated (*p < 0.05). c Correlation between LAP mRNA and protein expression levels (r, coefficient of correlation (Pearson); p, significance of correlation)

NF-kB signalling pathway analysis

Although the expression of NF-kB and IkBα proteins did not differ between the HCD group and LCD group, the amounts of phosphorylated NF-kB and phosphorylated IkBα increased in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively, Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Effect of a HCD on the NF-kB signalling pathway in mammary gland. a Western blot results of phospho-NF-kB p65, p65 (GAPDH as an internal control), phospho-IkB, and IkB (β- tubulin as an internal control) proteins. Bands 1–4 represent LCD group samples, while bands 5–8 represent HCD group samples. b The mean relative expression of the target protein against the reference protein as quantified by band density. Significant difference is indicated (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that rumen-derived LPS caused enhanced inflammatory responses, immune responses and LAP synthesis in mammary glands of cows fed a HCD.

Ruminants are often fed a relatively high proportion of grains or easily fermentable carbohydrates to support high milk yields [30]. Although this type of diet can promote cost efficiency over the short term, it would do harm to ruminant health and welfare in the long term [1]. In our present study, two different diets (HCD and LCD) were designed and used based on practical experience. The high incidence of SARA, a common digestive disorder in many dairy herds, is associated with feeding ruminants a HCD [1, 3, 5, 30] and also the physical form of total mixed ratio (both forage and grain) [31, 32], because a HCD can cause a decrease in ruminal pH due to the accumulation of short-chain fatty acids including organic acids and volatile fatty acids (VFA) [1, 33]. As shown in Table 3, the mean pH value of ruminal fluid in the HCD group was lower than that in the LCD group (p < 0.05) and was lower than 5.6 for more than 3 h per day, which is consistent with previous studies and which indicated that SARA was successfully induced by the HCD [2]. Alterations in the ruminal environment appear to lead to Gram-negative bacteria lysis and subsequent release of large amounts of LPS into the ruminal fluid [3, 5]. In the present study, the concentrations of LPS in the ruminal fluid and in the plasma from the lacteal artery and the lacteal vein of the HCD group were significantly higher than were those in the LCD group (p < 0.01 for all three of them) as shown in Table 3. These results are consistent with previous reports [1, 3] and indicated that a higher level of LPS did translocate into the circulatory system across the epithelial barrier of the gastrointestinal tract in the HCD group.

LPS in the peripheral blood initiates inflammatory responses [3, 5] by activating some inflammation-related enzymes and by secreting several pro-inflammatory cytokines. MPO, which is stored in azurophilic granules of neutrophils, is a neutrophil bactericidal protein. Its activity reflects the state of inflammation and oxidative stress [34]. NAG, one of the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of proteoglycans, is a good marker for estimating the degree of infection in bovine mammary glands [35]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) play crucial role in inflammation [36]. In the current study, MPO activity, NAG activity, and pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) concentration in plasma from the lacteal vein in the HCD group increased compared with those in the LCD group, which provided evidence for activation of systemic inflammatory responses.

A high concentration of LPS enhanced the expression of various cytokines and β-defensins in the MECs of dairy cows [37]. MECs are located at the interface between the body and the environment. These cells not only function as a physical barrier for pathogens but also participate in the innate immune defence via producing inflammatory mediators such as cytokines, chemokines, and host defence peptides [38]. In the present study, the mRNA analysis of genes expressed in the mammary gland that are associated with inflammatory responses and immune responses, including LAP, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, were all enhanced in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group. However, BNBD5 mRNA expression was not significantly different but had an increasing tendency probably owing to the high variability between individual values. The LPS concentration in the lacteal vein in the HCD group might explain why the inflammatory and subsequent immune responses were activated in the mammary gland.

Not only the mRNA analysis but also the protein analysis of LAP showed a difference between the HCD group and the LCD group. LAP secretion in the cytoplasm of the MECs was demonstrated previously by immunohistochemistry [17]. In the present study, positive immunoreactions of LAP were observed in the cytoplasm of MECs in sections obtained from the HCD group, while the sections from the LCD group and the control sections did not show positive reactions. Furthermore, the western blot results confirmed that the LAP protein concentration in the HCD group was higher than that in the LCD group and had a strong correlation with its corresponding relative copy numbers of mRNA. Additionally, the finding that the SCC and the LAP protein concentration both increased in the HCD group compared with those in the LCD group is consistent with Kawai et al [39] and Isobe et al [40], who found that the SCC is associated with the LAP protein concentration in the milk. Recently, Kawai et al [41] also found that LF concentration decreased with decrease in SCC after antibiotics treatment, but not LAP concentration and LPO activity, which differed depending on the severity of mastitis.

The p65 subunit of NF-kB is known to play a stimulatory role in LAP expression in MECs. NF-kB can be activated by LPS and is implicated in regulating immune responses [42]. Mature NF-kB, which is sequestered in the cytoplasm in a quiescent state by interaction with IkBα, is a heterodimer of two subunits, p50 and p65, and the major pathway leading to their activation is based on IkBα phosphorylation and degradation [43]. The p50/p65 heterodimer translocates into the nucleus and binds to the kB sites on the promoter region of genes when the nuclear localization signal is exposed [44]. As shown previously, although NF-kB mRNA expression and NF-kB and IkBα protein expression did not differ between the HCD group and LCD group, phosphorylated NF-kB and phosphorylated IkBα protein expression significantly increased in the HCD group compared with that in the LCD group, which indicated that the NF-kB signalling pathway was activated after HCD administration. This result was consistent with previously reported results [24], thus we supposed that activation of the NF-kB signalling pathway is one of the mechanism that enhances LAP synthesis and immune responses.

Conclusions

In summary, our study clearly documented that after long-term HCD feeding, rumen-derived LPS translocated to the blood stream, triggers inflammatory and immune responses and enhances LAP synthesis via the NF-kB signalling pathway in mammary glands of lactating cows. Our findings may shed light on the mechanism involved in rumen-derived LPS on LAP synthesis and immune responses in mammary glands of dairy cows fed a HCD.

Abbreviations

BCA, bicinchoninic acid protein assay; BNBD, bovine neutrophil β-defensin; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DAB, diaminobenzidine; ECL, chemiluminescence; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HCD, high-concentrate diet; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IkB, inhibitory kappa B α; IL, interleukin; LAP, lingual antimicrobial peptide; LCD, low-concentrate diet; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MECs, mammary epithelial cells; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NAG, β-N-acetyl glucosaminidase; NF-kB, nuclear factor-kappaB; SARA, subacute ruminal acidosis; SCC, somatic cell count; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully appreciate Dr Naoki Isobe (Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Japan) for kindly providing us anti-LAP antibody.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31172371), the National Basic Research Programme of China (2011CB100802), and the Priority Academic Programme Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting our findings is contained within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

DJ conducted most of the measurements of parameters in this study, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. GC, KZ, TX and JG contributed to animal experiment and sample collection. XS conceived the idea, designed the experiments and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any financial or personal competing interests that would have influenced the content of the paper or interfered with their objective assessment of the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol and sampling procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University in accordance with the Guidelines for Experimental Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2006, Beijing, China).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University

References

  1. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN, McBride BW. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J. 2008;176:21–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kleen JL, Hooijer GA, Rehage J, Noordhuizen JP. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003;50:406–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:1060–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gozho GN, Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Kennedy AD, Wittenberg KM. Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:1399–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Emmanuel DGV, Dunn SM, Ametaj BN. Feeding high proportions of barley grain stimulates an inflammatory response in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:606–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ametaj BN, Koenig KM, Dunn SM, Yang WZ, Zebeli Q, Beauchemin KA. Backgrounding and finishing diets are associated with inflammatory responses in feedlot steers. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:1314–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beutler B, Rietschel ET. Innate immune sensing and its roots: the story of endotoxin. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:169–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heine H, Rietschel ET, Ulmer AJ. The biology of endotoxin. Mol Biotechnol. 2001;19:279–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Swanson K, Gorodetsky S, Good L, Davis S, Musgrave D, Stelwagen K, et al. Expression of a beta-defensin mRNA, lingual antimicrobial peptide, in bovine mammary epithelial tissue is induced by mastitis. Infect Immun. 2004;72:7311–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Schonwetter BS, Stolzenberg ED, Zasloff MA. Epithelial antibiotics induced at sites of inflammation. Science. 1995;267:1645–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kagan BL, Ganz T, Lehrer RI. Defensins: a family of antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides. Toxicology. 1994;87:131–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond G, Zasloff M, Eck H, Brasseur M, Maloy WL, Bevins CL. Tracheal antimicrobial peptide, a cysteine-rich peptide from mammalian tracheal mucosa: peptide isolation and cloning of a cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:3952–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tarver AP, Clark DP, Diamond G, Russell JP, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. Enteric beta-defensin: molecular cloning and characterization of a gene with inducible intestinal epithelial cell expression associated with Cryptosporidium parvum infection. Infect Immunity. 1998;66:1045–56.Google Scholar
  14. Cormican P, Meade KG, Cahalane S, Narciandi F, Chapwanya A, Lloyd AT, et al. Evolution, expression and effectiveness in a cluster of novel bovine beta-defensins. Immunogenetics. 2008;60:147–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldammer T, Zerbe H, Molenaar A, Schuberth HJ, Brunner RM, Kata SR, et al. Mastitis increases mammary mRNA abundance of beta-defensin 5, toll-like-receptor 2 (TLR2), and TLR4 but not TLR9 in cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:174–85.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Roosen S, Exner K, Paul S, Schroder JM, Kalm E, Looft C. Bovine beta-defensins: identification and characterization of novel bovine beta-defensin genes and their expression in mammary gland tissue. Mamm Genome. 2004;15:834–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Isobe N, Hosoda K, Yoshimura Y. Immunolocalization of lingual antimicrobial peptide (LAP) in the bovine mammary gland. Anim Sci J. 2009;80:446–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh K, Davis SR, Dobson JM, Molenaar AJ, Wheeler TT, Prosser CG, et al. cDNA microarray analysis reveals that antioxidant and immune genes are upregulated during involution of the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:2236–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Petzl W, Zerbe H, Gunther J, Yang W, Seyfert HM, Nurnberg G, et al. Escherichia coli, but not Staphylococcus aureus triggers an early increased expression of factors contributing to the innate immune defense in the udder of the cow. Vet Res. 2008;39:18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Swanson KM, Stelwagen K, Dobson J, Henderson HV, Davis SR, Farr VC, et al. Transcriptome profiling of Streptococcus uberis-induced mastitis reveals fundamental differences between immune gene expression in the mammary gland and in a primary cell culture model. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:117–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Isobe N, Nakamura J, Nakano H, Yoshimura Y. Existence of functional lingual antimicrobial peptide in bovine milk. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2691–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Isobe N, Morimoto K, Nakamura J, Yamasaki A, Yoshimura Y. Intramammary challenge of lipopolysaccharide stimulates secretion of lingual antimicrobial peptide into milk of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:6046–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunther J, Liu S, Esch K, Schuberth HJ, Seyfert HM. Stimulated expression of TNF-alpha and IL-8, but not of lingual antimicrobial peptide reflects the concentration of pathogens contacting bovine mammary epithelial cells. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2010;135:152–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu S, Shi X, Bauer I, Gunther J, Seyfert HM. Lingual antimicrobial peptide and IL-8 expression are oppositely regulated by the antagonistic effects of NF-kappaB p65 and C/EBPbeta in mammary epithelial cells. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:895–908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stolzenberg ED, Anderson GM, Ackermann MR, Whitlock RH, Zasloff M. Epithelial antibiotic induced in states of disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:8686–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Isobe N, Sugino T, Taniguchi K, Moriya N, Hosoda K, Yoshimura Y. Differential localization of lingual antimicrobial peptide in the digestive tract mucosal epithelium of calves. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2011;142:87–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu JH, Xu TT, Zhu WY, Mao SY. A high-grain diet alters the omasal epithelial structure and expression of tight junction proteins in a goat model. Vet J. 2014;201:95–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou J, Dong G, Ao C, Zhang S, Qiu M, Wang X, et al. Feeding a high-concentrate corn straw diet increased the release of endotoxin in the rumen and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the mammary gland of dairy cows. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:172.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ershun Z, Yunhe F, Zhengkai W, Yongguo C, Naisheng Z, Zhengtao Y. Cepharanthine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced mice mastitis by suppressing the NF-kB signaling pathway. Inflammation. 2014;37:331–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgante M, Stelletta C, Berzaghi P, Gianesella M, Andrighetto I. Subacute rumen acidosis in lactating cows: an investigation in intensive Italian dairy herds. J Anim Physiol An N. 2007;91:226–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. De Nardi R, Marchesini G, Stefani AL, Barberio A, Andrighetto I, Segato S. Effect of feeding fine maize particles on the reticular pH, milk yield and composition of dairy cows. J Anim Physiol An N. 2014;98:504–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Beauchemin KA, Yang WZ. Effects of physically effective fiber on intake, chewing activity, and ruminal acidosis for dairy cows fed diets based on corn silage. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2117–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu T, Tao H, Chang G, Zhang K, Xu L, Shen X. Lipopolysaccharide derived from the rumen down-regulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 expression and alters fatty acid composition in the liver of dairy cows fed a high-concentrate diet. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Nussbaum C, Klinke A, Adam M, Baldus S, Sperandio M. Myeloperoxidase: a leukocyte-derived protagonist of inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Antioxid Redox Sign. 2013;18:692–713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kankofer M, Wiercinski J, Zerbe H. Activity of Placental β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase in cows with and without retained fetal membranes. Reprod Domest Anim. 2000;35(3-4):97–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Notebaert S, Demon D, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P, Meyer E. Inflammatory mediators in Escherichia coli-induced mastitis in mice. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;31:551–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Strandberg Y, Gray C, Vuocolo T, Donaldson L, Broadway M, Tellam R. Lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid induce different innate immune responses in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Cytokine. 2005;31:72–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rainard P, Riollet C. Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Vet Res. 2006;37:369–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kawai K, Akamatsu H, Obayashi T, Nagahata H, Higuchi H, Iwano H, et al. Relationship between concentration of lingual antimicrobial peptide and somatic cell count in milk of dairy cows. Vet Immunol Immunop. 2013;153:298–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Isobe N, Shibata A, Kubota H, Yoshimura Y. Lingual antimicrobial peptide and lactoferrin concentrations and lactoperoxidase activity in bovine colostrum are associated with subsequent somatic cell count. Anim Sci J. 2013;84:751–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawai K, Korematsu K, Akiyama K, Okita M, Yoshimura Y, Isobe N. Dynamics of lingual antimicrobial peptide, lactoferrin concentrations and lactoperoxidase activity in the milk of cows treated for clinical mastitis. An Sci J. 2015;86:153–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vallabhapurapu S, Karin M. Regulation and function of NF-kappaB transcription factors in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:693–733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheidereit C. IkappaB kinase complexes: gateways to NF-kappaB activation and transcription. Oncogene. 2006;25:6685–705.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pahl HL. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. Oncogene. 1999;18:6853–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016