Skip to main content
Download PDF

Toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect against Clostridium perfringens-induced necrosis in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis

BMC Veterinary Research volume 12, Article number: 101 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis is caused by Clostridium perfringens type A. Due to the rapid progress and fatal outcome of the disease, vaccination would be of high value. In this study, C. perfringens toxins, either as native toxins or after formaldehyde inactivation, were evaluated as possible vaccine antigens. We determined whether antisera raised in calves against these toxins were able to protect against C. perfringens challenge in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis.

Results

Alpha toxin and perfringolysin O were identified as the most immunogenic proteins in the vaccine preparations. All vaccines evoked a high antibody response against the causative toxins, alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, as detected by ELISA. All antibodies were able to inhibit the activity of alpha toxin and perfringolysin O in vitro. However, the antibodies raised against the native toxins were more inhibitory to the C. perfringens-induced cytotoxicity (as tested on bovine endothelial cells) and only these antibodies protected against C. perfringens challenge in the intestinal loop model.

Conclusion

Although immunization of calves with both native and formaldehyde inactivated toxins resulted in high antibody titers against alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, only antibodies raised against native toxins protect against C. perfringens challenge in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis.

Background

The ubiquitous, spore forming, Gram-positive bacterium Clostridium perfringens is considered to be the most widespread pathogenic bacterium in the world [1–4]. It can cause a wide range of diseases including, amongst others, gas gangrene in man and necrohemorrhagic enteritis in suckling and veal calves [5–8]. Most of these diseases follow a very rapid, often fatal course. Therefore, curative treatment is difficult and control must rely on preventive measures, including vaccination. Virulence properties of different C. perfringens strains are largely determined by their ability to secrete a variety of proteinaceous toxins and enzymes, which can cause different forms of tissue damage [2–4, 9]. Alpha toxin and perfringolysin O have been identified as the principal toxins involved in the pathogenesis of both C. perfringens-induced gas gangrene and bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis [10, 11]. These toxins exert different effects in both diseases. Bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis is characterized by congestion of the capillaries, hemorrhages and inflammation. This is in contrast to gas gangrene, where these toxins lead to tissue necrosis, thrombosis and lack of leukocyte infiltration at the site of infection [10–12]. It is well known that humoral antibodies against secreted proteinaceous virulence factors of C. perfringens can be protective, as shown in different animal models. As the enzymes and toxins of C. perfringens are highly destructive to tissues, vaccines against a variety of clostridial diseases have been developed using the denatured proteins [13–15]. Despite the usefulness of formaldehyde toxoids for other C. perfringens-associated diseases, there is controversy about the efficacy of such vaccines for gas gangrene, as opposed to crude toxin preparations [8, 16–18]. In addition, multivalent clostridial vaccines based on formaldehyde inactivated exotoxins derived from culture supernatant are commercially available for domestic livestock, including bovines, but no studies on their efficacy for necrohemorrhagic enteritis in calves are available.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether antibodies against C. perfringens toxins could protect against the development of necrotic lesions in the intestine. Therefore, calves were immunized with native C. perfringens toxins. To evaluate whether we could eliminate the undesired toxin activity, but conserve the immune-protective potential, a previously described, modified formaldehyde treatment was also tested [19]. Also a commercial formaldehyde inactivated multivalent clostridial vaccine was used. As necrohemorrhagic enteritis in veal calves is an unpredictable event and experimental reproduction of the disease is difficult, the neutralizing activity of the antibodies was evaluated in a previously developed intestinal loop model [20]. To further unravel the mechanism of protection, the inhibitory effect of the evoked antibodies on C. perfringens-induced cytotoxicity to bovine endothelial cells was evaluated and the toxin-neutralizing capacity against alpha toxin and perfringolysin O was analyzed.

Results

Western blot analysis

The proteins in the C. perfringens toxin preparation were visualized by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1a). In the vaccinated calves, the production of circulating antibodies against C. perfringens supernatant and the C. perfringens toxin preparation was analyzed by western blot in three separate experiments (Fig. 1). No immune reaction was detected in the sera before immunization (data not shown). Sera obtained from calves six weeks after initial vaccination with either native toxins or the L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxins, revealed immunoreactivity towards two proteins. Immune sera from calves vaccinated with the commercial formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine showed immunoreactivity towards more proteins. The two proteins that were immunoreactive with antisera raised against all vaccine preparations were further identified as alpha toxin and perfringolysin O by MALDI analysis.

Fig. 1
figure1

Western blot analysis of the immune sera. a SDS-PAGE of the C. perfringens toxin preparation after Coomassie staining. b-d Representative Western blots showing the immunoreactivity towards crude C. perfringens supernatants (lane 1) and the C. perfringens toxin preparation (lane 2). The immune sera from calves vaccinated with native toxins (b) and formaldehyde inactivated, L-lysine protected C. perfringens toxins (c) detect only two proteins, whereas the commercial formaldehyde inactivated multivalent clostridial vaccine (d) reacts with multiple proteins. The blots shown are representative pictures of one out of three experiments

Full size image

ELISA

In the vaccinated calves, the production of circulating antibodies directed against alpha toxin and perfringolysin O was also monitored by ELISA. No antibodies against alpha toxin or perfringolysin O were detected in the sera before immunization. In all calves a strong antibody response against both alpha toxin and perfringolysin O was detected 6 weeks after initial immunization. Calves vaccinated with the native C. perfringens toxins showed the highest antibody titers, whereas vaccination with formaldehyde inactivated toxins (either L-lysine protected or commercial inactivation) resulted in a more variable immune response (Table 1).

Table 1 Calves were immunized with either a C. perfringens toxin preparation (native toxins), L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins (L-lysine/formaldehyde toxoid) or a commercial multivalent formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine
Full size table

Protective effect of antisera against C. perfringens-induced necrosis in an intestinal loop model

The potential of the antisera, derived after vaccination of calves with the respective vaccines, to inhibit C. perfringens-induced necrosis, was evaluated in an intestinal loop assay. All positive control loops inoculated with C. perfringens developed necrosis. Injection of loops with C. perfringens together with sera from naive calves (pre-immune sera) also resulted in a high percentage of necrotic loops. Injection of C. perfringens together with antisera raised against native toxins resulted in significantly fewer necrotic loops as compared to the positive control loops (p < 0.001) and the loops injected with the pre-immune sera (p < 0.01). Antisera raised against formaldehyde inactivated toxoid (either L-lysine protected or commercial) were unable to significantly neutralize the necrosis-inducing activity of C. perfringens (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Neutralization of the lesion-inducing potential of C. perfringens. The graph represents the percentage of ligated intestinal loops in which necrotic lesions were present after 5 h of incubation with sterile culture medium (n = 20), C. perfringens alone (untreated, n = 20) or C. perfringens in combination with naive sera (pre-immune serum, n = 60), antiserum to C. perfringens toxins (native toxins, n = 20), formaldehyde inactivated, L-lysine protected C. perfringens toxins (L-lysine/formaldehyde, n = 20) and commercial formaldehyde inactivated multivalent clostridial vaccine (commercial formaldehyde, n = 20). ** 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 or *** p < 0.001

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

C. perfringens-induced necrosis in experimentally infected intestinal loops in calves. a Representative histological section from an intestinal loop without necrotic lesions. This loop was injected with C. perfringens in combination with antiserum to native C. perfringens toxins. b Representative section from an intestinal loop from the same calf, showing hemorrhage and extensive necrosis of the villi. This loops was injected with C. perfringens in combination with naïve immune serum

Full size image

Neutralization of alpha toxin and perfringolysin O activity in vitro

The inhibitory capacity of the sera towards alpha toxin and perfringolysin O activities was further examined using recombinant toxins. All antisera decreased the activity of alpha toxin in vitro (Table 2). Up to a final dilution of 409.8 the antisera against the native toxins neutralized 50 % of the alpha toxin activity. To the contrary, in order to obtain the same inhibition of alpha toxin activity, antisera against L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxoid or against the commercial formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine could only be diluted up to final dilutions of 80.47 or 22.39, respectively.

Table 2 In vitro neutralization of biological activities of alpha toxin and perfringolysin O. Calves were immunized with either a C. perfringens toxin preparation (native toxins), L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins (L-lysine/formaldehyde toxoid) or a commercial multivalent formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine
Full size table

The hemolytic activity of perfringolysin O towards equine erythrocytes in vitro was decreased by all antisera (Table 2). Up to a final dilution of 18 either antiserum inhibited the perfringolysin O activity completely. This neutralizing ability of the sera was observed up to a final dilution of 48 for the anti-native toxins antisera, a final dilution of 72 for the anti-L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxoid or a final dilution of 18 when the antiserum obtained after vaccination with the commercial vaccine was used. The pre-immune sera had no effect on the alpha toxin or perfringolysin O activity in vitro.

Neutralization of C. perfringens cytotoxicity to bovine endothelial cells

To determine whether the cytotoxic activity of C. perfringens could be inhibited by the antisera to the vaccines, C. perfringens supernatants were incubated with serial dilutions of the antisera. Exposure of the endothelial cells to untreated C. perfringens supernatant resulted in 100 % cell death. More than 80 % cell viability could be measured by pre-incubation of the C. perfringens supernatant with a 32-fold dilution of the native toxins antiserum. At this concentration, neither the antisera raised against L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxins nor the antisera raised against the commercial formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine had an effect on the cytotoxicity (Table 3). The pre-immune sera had no effect on the C. perfringens cytotoxicity.

Table 3 In vitro neutralization of C. perfringens cytotoxicity. Calves were immunized with either a C. perfringens toxin preparation (native toxins), L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins (L-lysine/formaldehyde toxoid) or a commercial multivalent formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine
Full size table

Discussion

Necrohemorrhagic enteritis caused by C. perfringens in suckling and veal calves is characterized by sudden death. Due to the very rapid course of the disease, curative treatment is not possible and therefore, protection by vaccination would be of high value. The virulence of C. perfringens is due to the many extracellular toxins it produces. In this study we showed that toxin neutralizing antibodies protect against C. perfringens-induced necrotic lesions in an intestinal loop assay and are able to prevent endothelial damage. Western blot analysis revealed antibodies towards alpha toxin and perfringolysin O as the most abundant antibodies in the immune sera from calves vaccinated against C. perfringens toxins.

We previously reported congestion and leakage of the capillaries as an early event in the pathogenesis of necrohemorrhagic enteritis as shown in an intestinal loop assay [20]. Furthermore we showed that alpha toxin and perfringolysin O may exert their effect by directly targeting the endothelial cells [10]. This points towards endothelial damage as a key event in the pathogenesis of bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. Indeed, in the present study antisera which protected against C. perfringens-induced cytotoxicity to bovine endothelial cells also offered protection against C. perfringens-associated necrosis in an intestinal loop assay. Moreover, the protective antisera were shown to inhibit the activity of alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, which further underscores the roles of these toxins in the pathogenesis of bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. It can, however, not be ruled out that antibodies induced against other substances present in the vaccines also played a role in the protection observed in the intestinal loop model.

Formaldehyde inactivation of C. perfringens toxins diminished their capacity to induce protective antibodies. Antisera raised against L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins were also not protective in the intestinal loop model. This result is in disagreement with previous studies showing high antigenicity, low toxicity, and protection in mice that were immunized with L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxoid and subsequently challenged with lethal doses of C. perfringens [19, 21]. In the present study we demonstrated that vaccinations with C. perfringens toxins, either in their native forms or as formaldehyde inactivated toxoids, all resulted in high antibody responses as detected by ELISA. However, only serum derived from animals immunized with the native toxins offered protection against necrosis in an intestinal loop assay. There is thus a discrepancy between the antibody titers against formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins measured by ELISA and the protective capacity of these antibodies in the intestinal loop model. Nevertheless, the value of vaccines based on formaldehyde inactivated C. perfringens toxins has been demonstrated for diseases associated with toxins other than alpha toxin and perfringolysin O [22–25]. This suggests that the protective immunogenicity of other C. perfringens toxins, such as, amongst others, NetB and epsilon toxin, is not affected by formaldehyde inactivation.

Although the use of C. perfringens native toxins represents an efficient strategy for vaccine development, active toxins cannot be regarded as safe. Therefore methods for the development of toxoids other than formaldehyde inactivation are needed. Possible strategies include the use of genetically modified toxoids based on site-directed mutants with reduced toxic activity or the use of immunologically active fragments of the essential toxins. Immunization with the carboxy-terminal domain of alpha toxin has previously been shown to provide protection in a mouse model against C. perfringens gas gangrene and may be a good candidate for development of a vaccine against bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis [21, 26]. The identification of the structural elements responsible for membrane interaction of perfringolysin O provides opportunities for the development of non-toxic site-directed mutants as alternatives for native perfringolysin O [27].

In order to obtain the ultimate evidence that vaccination against C. perfringens toxins protects against bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis, field trials need to be performed. However, since necrohemorrhagic enteritis is a low incidence disease, this would be a huge cost and more evidence concerning the immune-protective potential of the antisera is needed before considering this type of trial. Unfortunately, no in vivo model to validate the protective immune-potential of the candidate vaccines against bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis is available. Niilo and colleagues were able to induce a mild diarrhea in cattle inoculated intraduodenally or per os with C. perfringens type A cultures, but no necrohemorrhagic enteritis was established [28]. Also we were unable to develop a reliable model of bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis after per os or intraduodenal administration of C. perfringens type A cultures (unpublished results).

Conclusion

This study showed that toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect against C. perfringens challenge in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. Immunization of calves with either native or formaldehyde inactivated toxins resulted in a strong immune response against alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, but only antibodies raised against native toxins were protective in the intestinal loop model. Therefore it seems that, at least for alpha toxin mediated diseases, antibody titers detected by ELISA are not a guarantee for protection, even if protection against the disease is antibody mediated.

Methods

Vaccine preparation and immunization

C. perfringens toxin preparation (P4039, Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium) was either used as native toxin or treated with formaldehyde to generate a formaldehyde toxoid. Inactivation was obtained by adding a combination of 0.4 % formaldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.05 M L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubation at 37 °C for two days. The addition of 0.05 M L-lysine has previously been shown to preserve the antigenicity of alpha toxin during toxoid formation [19]. Inactivation of alpha toxin was confirmed by spotting 5 μl drops on 2 % egg yolk Columbia agar plates (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany), followed by incubation for 16 h at 37 °C [29]. Native and formaldehyde inactivated toxins were formulated with the adjuvant Quil A (Brenntag Biosector, Frederikssund, Denmark) at a final concentration of 350 μg antigen and 750 μg Quil A in 1.5 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS) per animal and filter-sterilized using a 0.2 μm filter. A standard formalin inactivated multivalent commercial vaccine was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Covexin 10®, Zoetis, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium).

For immunization six 2-months old male Holstein Friesian calves were used. The calves were purchased from a local tradesman which collects dairy calves from herds in Eastern Flanders. They were housed on straw and received water and hay at libitum, and concentrates adjusted to the body weight.

For each antigen, two calves were immunized subcutaneously in the neck. The calves received a primer vaccination at the age of two months, with booster immunizations 14 and 28 days later. No strong adverse reactions were observed. Although no fever (>39.5 °C) was induced, all calves experienced a mild hyperthermia for two days following the vaccination. As described in the drug information leaflet of the commercial vaccine, localized swelling occurred at the site of injection. This effect was more pronounced in the calves vaccinated with the commercial formaldehyde inactivated clostridial vaccine (7–10 cm diameter) as compared to the calves vaccinated with either native toxins or the L-lysine protected, formaldehyde inactivated toxins (0–6 cm diameter). Blood samples were taken before primer vaccination and two weeks after the final booster vaccination.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

The proteins present in the toxin preparation were visualized on a 12 % SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Briliant Blue staining (Sigma-Aldrich). For the Western Blot analysis, 16 μl of cell-free supernatants of the C. perfringens strain JIR325 (10x concentrated using Vivaspin, Sartorium Stedim Biotech GmbH, Goettingen, Germany) or 6 μg of the C. perfringens toxin preparation were loaded on a 12 % SDS-PAGE. The proteins from the gel were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes of 0.45 μm pore size. Non-specific binding to the blots was blocked with 5 % skimmed milk powder in PBS, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with a 1/500 dilution of the immune sera collected two weeks after the final booster immunization. For this incubation step, the sera of the 2 animals that were vaccinated with a given vaccine preparation were pooled. Blots were washed with 0.1 % tween 20 in PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-labelled rabbit-anti-bovine IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). Blots were developed with CN/DAB substrate kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, USA). The test was performed in triplicate. The specific immunoreactive protein bands were identified in the parallel-run Coomassie stained gel followed by MALDI analysis.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The immune response following vaccination was also measured by ELISA using serum samples two weeks after the final booster immunization.

Alpha toxin-specific antibody levels were determined by the end-point dilution method using a blocking ELISA (Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin serological ELISA kit, Bio-X Diagnostics, Jemelle, Belgium). For each ELISA, sera were used at a dilution 1:50 and assays were performed in duplicate. The specific antibody level of the immune serum was expressed as the percent inhibition (% inhib) by means of the following formula: % inhib = [(OD neg – OD sample)/OD neg] * 100.

Perfringolysin O-specific antibody levels were measured using an indirect ELISA. Briefly, 96-well microtitre plates (Nunc MaxiSorp, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with 20 μg recombinant perfringolysin O [30]. Non-specific binding was blocked with 1 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. Two-fold dilutions of the sera ranging from a dilution of 1:50 to 1:51200 were added to the plates (100 μl of each dilution/well; in duplicate) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed with 0.1 % (v/v) Tween 20 in PBS and incubated for 1 h 30 min at 37 °C with horseradish peroxidase-labelled rabbit-anti-bovine IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). Bound conjugate was detected using the substrate 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction was blocked with H2SO4 and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Multiscan MS, Thermo Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). The end-point titer is expressed as the reciprocal of the last dilution that gave a reading of 0.1U above background (precolostral neonatal bovine serum).

Intestinal loop model

To study the protection against C. perfringens-induced necrosis provided by the antisera from calves vaccinated with the vaccine preparations, four intestinal loop experiments were performed. Intestinal loop experiments were performed according to a previously described protocol using 4 healthy male Holstein Friesian calves, purchased from a local tradesman which collects dairy calves from herds in Eastern Flanders [20]. Briefly, the calves were anesthetized and the small intestine was exteriorized. Per calf 80 intestinal loops of approximately 10 cm were ligated in the jejunum and a 5 cm space was left between the loops. Only half of the loops were injected, thus each time leaving one intervening loop to avoid leakage between sampled loops. For each vaccine preparation individual pre- and post-vaccination sera of 2 calves were used in two intestinal loop experiments. Intestinal loops were inoculated with 20 ml of a wild-type strain (JIR325) in combination with 10 ml of 25 % commercial milk replacer suspended in sterile NaCl solution, resulting in a total volume of 30 ml which was the same across all treatments and control loops. Prior to inoculation pre- or post-immune serum derived from calves immunized with the different vaccine preparations was added to the NaCl solution containing milk replacer, to obtain a final concentration of 6 % serum (v/v). In each calf five intestinal loops per test serum were injected. Also an equal number of control loops without addition of serum were injected either with C. perfringens (positive control) or with sterile bacterial growth medium (negative control). After injection of the loops, the abdomen was closed and the calves were maintained under anesthesia. At 5-h post-inoculation intestinal biopsy samples were taken, after which the animals were euthanized. Samples were fixed in 4 % phosphate buffered formaldehyde. They were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The sections were evaluated in a blinded manner by a board certified pathologist for presence of tissue necrosis (0 = absence of necrosis, 1 = necrotic lesions present).

In vitro neutralization and cytotoxicity tests

Neutralization of alpha toxin activity on egg yolk lipoproteins in vitro

The alpha toxin activity was determined by its effect on egg yolk lipoproteins as previously described [31]. Therefore, fresh egg yolk was centrifuged (10,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C) and diluted 1:10 in PBS. The ability of the sera to neutralize the alpha toxin activity was assessed by pre-incubating a two-fold dilution series of the sera (two wells per dilution) with a constant amount of alpha toxin (10 μg/ml recombinant alpha toxin in PBS solution) for 30 min at 37 °C prior to the addition of 10 % egg yolk emulsion. Recombinant alpha toxin was expressed in E. coli using the pBAD TOPO® TA Expression Kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) followed by purification onto a Ni-sepharose column (His Gravitrap, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). After incubation of the plates at 37 °C for 1 h, the A620 was determined. Alpha toxin activity was indicated by the development of turbidity which results in an increase in absorbance. The inhibitory capacity of the antiserum was determined by applying a Hill function to the concentration-response data (GraphPad Prism 5, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and expressed as the dilution that inhibited 50 % of the alpha toxin activity. The test was performed in duplicate.

Neutralization of perfringolysin O activity in vitro

Perfringolysin O (PFO) activity was determined by measuring the hemolysis of horse erythrocytes using a doubling dilution assay as previously described [32]. The PFO titer is the reciprocal of the last dilution which showed complete hemolysis. Similar to the inhibition of the alpha toxin activities, the ability of sera to neutralize the PFO activity was assessed by pre-incubating a two-fold dilution series of the sera (two wells per dilution) with a constant amount of perfringolysin O (2 μg/ml recombinant perfringolysin O). Recombinant perfringolysin O was produced as previously described [33]. The inhibitory capacity of the antiserum was expressed as the highest dilution that inhibited perfringolysin O induced hemolysis. The test was performed in duplicate.

Endothelial cell cytotoxicity assay

Primary bovine umbilical vein endothelial cells (BUVEC) were isolated from umbilical cord veins by an adaptation of the method of Jaffe et al. as performed previously [10, 34]. The toxicity of C. perfringens supernatant towards cultured bovine endothelial cells has been reported previously [10]. The ability of the antisera to neutralize the C. perfringens cytotoxicity towards BUVECs was determined using a Neutral Red Uptake assay (NRU) [35]. Therefore, a two-fold dilution series of the sera (100 % - 0.4 %) prepared in serum free cell culture medium was pre-incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with an equal amount of C. perfringens supernatant. Cells were treated with 100 μl of these supernatant-serum mixtures. The inhibitory capacity of the antiserum was expressed as the highest dilution that yielded 80 % cell viability. As a positive control, cells were treated with C. perfringens supernatant which was pre-incubated for 30 min with serum free cell culture medium. Untreated cells, incubated with serum free cell culture medium served as a negative control. The test was performed in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

The 20 loops tested for each condition provided enough statistical power to detect a 40 % reduction in the development of necrotic lesions in the intestinal loop assay (95 % confidence, 80 % power) (Winepiscope 2.0).

The protective effect of the antisera in the intestinal loop assay as compared to the pre-immune sera and the untreated control loops were determined by a Fisher’s exact test (GraphPad Prism 5 software). Differences between groups were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Abbreviations

BUVEC, bovine umbilical vein endothelial cells; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; NRU assay, neutral red uptake assay; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PFO, perfringolysin O; TMB, 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine

References

  1. 1.

    Matches JR, Liston J, Curran D. Clostridium perfringens in the environment. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28(4):655–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rood JI. Virulence genes of Clostridium perfringens. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:333–60.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Petit L, Gibert M, Popoff MR. Clostridium perfringens: toxinotype and genotype. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7(3):104–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Songer JG. Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(2):216–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Manteca C, Daube G, Pirson V, Limbourg B, Kaeckenbeeck A, Mainil JG. Bacterial intestinal flora associated with enterotoxaemia in Belgian Blue calves. Vet Microbiol. 2001;81(1):21–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lebrun M, Mainil JG, Linden A. Cattle enterotoxaemia and Clostridium perfringens: description, diagnosis and prophylaxis. Vet Rec. 2010;167(1):13–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Muylaert A, Lebrun M, Duprez JN, Labrozzo S, Theys H, Taminiau B, Mainil J. Enterotoxaemia-like syndrome and Clostridium perfringens in veal calves. Vet Rec. 2010;167(2):64–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Titball RW. Gas gangrene: an open and closed case. Microbiology. 2005;151(Pt 9):2821–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Songer JG, Uzal FA. Clostridial enteric infections in pigs. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005;17(6):528–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Verherstraeten S, Goossens E, Valgaeren B, Pardon B, Timbermont L, Vermeulen K, Schauvliege S, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Deprez P, et al. The synergistic necrohemorrhagic action of Clostridium perfringens perfringolysin and alpha toxin in the bovine intestine and against bovine endothelial cells. Vet Res. 2013;44(1):45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Awad MM, Ellemor DM, Boyd RL, Emmins JJ, Rood JI. Synergistic effects of alpha-toxin and perfringolysin O in Clostridium perfringens-mediated gas gangrene. Infect Immun. 2001;69(12):7904–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Stevens DL, Tweten RK, Awad MM, Rood JI, Bryant AE. Clostridial gas gangrene: evidence that alpha and theta toxins differentially modulate the immune response and induce acute tissue necrosis. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(1):189–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chandran D, Naidu SS, Sugumar P, Rani GS, Vijayan SP, Mathur D, Garg LC, Srinivasan VA. Development of a recombinant epsilon toxoid vaccine against enterotoxemia and its use as a combination vaccine with live attenuated sheep pox virus against enterotoxemia and sheep pox. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17(6):1013–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lobato FC, Lima CG, Assis RA, Pires PS, Silva RO, Salvarani FM, Carmo AO, Contigli C, Kalapothakis E. Potency against enterotoxemia of a recombinant Clostridium perfringens type D epsilon toxoid in ruminants. Vaccine. 2010;28(38):6125–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zeng J, Deng G, Wang J, Zhou J, Liu X, Xie Q, Wang Y. Potential protective immunogenicity of recombinant Clostridium perfringens alpha-beta2-beta1 fusion toxin in mice, sows and cows. Vaccine. 2011;29(33):5459–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Altemeier WA, Furste WL, Culbertson WR, Wadsworth CL, Tytell AA, Logan MA, Tytell AG. Toxoid Immunization in Experimental Gas Gangrene: A Preliminary Report. Ann Surg. 1947;126(4):509–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Boyd NA, Walker PD, Thomson RO. The prevention of experimental Clostridium novyi gas gangrene in high-velocity missile wounds by passive immunisation. J Med Microbiol. 1972;5(4):459–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maclennan JD. The histotoxic clostridial infections of man. Bacteriol Rev. 1962;26:177–276.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ito A. Alpha toxoid of Clostridium perfringens. I. Purification and toxoiding of alpha toxin of C. perfringens. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1968;21(6):379–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Valgaeren B, Pardon B, Goossens E, Verherstraeten S, Schauvliege S, Timbermont L, Ducatelle R, Deprez P, Van Immerseel F. Lesion Development in a New Intestinal Loop Model Indicates the Involvement of a Shared Clostridium perfringens Virulence Factor in Haemorrhagic Enteritis in Calves. J Comp Pathol. 2013;149(1):103–12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Stevens DL, Titball RW, Jepson M, Bayer CR, Hayes-Schroer SM, Bryant AE. Immunization with the C-Domain of alpha -Toxin prevents lethal infection, localizes tissue injury, and promotes host response to challenge with Clostridium perfringens. J Infect Dis. 2004;190(4):767–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Green DS, Green MJ, Hillyer MH, Morgan KL. Injection site reactions and antibody responses in sheep and goats after the use of multivalent clostridial vaccines. Vet Rec. 1987;120(18):435–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Uzal FA, Kelly WR. Protection of goats against experimental enterotoxaemia by vaccination with Clostridium perfringens type D epsilon toxoid. Vet Rec. 1998;142(26):722–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fernandes da Costa SP, Mot D, Bokori-Brown M, Savva CG, Basak AK, Van Immerseel F, Titball RW. Protection against avian necrotic enteritis after immunisation with NetB genetic or formaldehyde toxoids. Vaccine. 2013;31(37):4003–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thachil AJ, McComb B, Early MM, Heeder C, Nagaraja KV. Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium septicum toxoid to control cellulitis in turkeys. J Appl Poultry Res. 2012;21(2):358–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Williamson ED, Titball RW. A genetically engineered vaccine against the alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens protects mice against experimental gas gangrene. Vaccine. 1993;11(12):1253–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Soltani CE, Hotze EM, Johnson AE, Tweten RK. Structural elements of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins that are responsible for their cholesterol-sensitive membrane interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(51):20226–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Niilo L, Moffatt RE, Avery RJ. Bovine “Enterotoxemia”. II. Experimental Reproduction of the Disease. Can Vet J. 1963;4(11):288–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rigby GJ. An egg-yolk agar diffusion assay for monitoring phospholipase C in cultures of Clostridium welchii. J Appl Bacteriol. 1981;50(1):11–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tweten RK. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of the perfringolysin O (theta-toxin) gene from Clostridium perfringens and characterization of the gene product. Infect Immun. 1988;56(12):3228–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Logan AJ, Williamson ED, Titball RW, Percival DA, Shuttleworth AD, Conlan JW, Kelly DC. Epitope mapping of the alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens. Infect Immun. 1991;59(12):4338–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Awad MM, Bryant AE, Stevens DL, Rood JI. Virulence studies on chromosomal alpha-toxin and theta-toxin mutants constructed by allelic exchange provide genetic evidence for the essential role of alpha-toxin in Clostridium perfringens-mediated gas gangrene. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15(2):191–202.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Valgaeren BR, Pardon B, Goossens E, Verherstraeten S, Roelandt S, Timbermont L, Vekens NV, Stuyvaert S, Gille L, Van Driessche L et al. Veal Calves Produce Less Antibodies against C. Perfringens Alpha Toxin Compared to Beef Calves. Toxins. 2015;7(7):2586–97.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):2745–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(7):1125–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Christian Puttevils and Delphine Ameye for their skillful technical assistance. The authors thank Prof. Bart Devreese for the MALDI analysis. Rodney Tweten kindly provided the pTrcHisA plasmid encoding native perfringolysin O.

Funding

This work was supported by the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology under contract number 090910.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting our findings is contained within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Study design: EG, SV, BV, LT, BP, FH, RD, PD, FVI; Animal experiments: EG, SV, BV, DRM, SS; in vitro experiments: EG, SV; Preparation of the manuscript: EG, BP, FH, RD, PD, FVI. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University (EC2013/187 and EC2013/38). The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the approved protocols.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Evy Goossens, Stefanie Verherstraeten, Leen Timbermont, Freddy Haesebrouck, Richard Ducatelle & Filip Van Immerseel

  2. Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Biology of Large Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Bonnie R. Valgaeren, Bart Pardon & Piet R. Deprez

  3. Department of Surgery and Anesthesia of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Stijn Schauvliege & Diego Rodrigo-Mocholí

Authors
  1. Evy Goossens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Verherstraeten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bonnie R. Valgaeren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bart Pardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Leen Timbermont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stijn Schauvliege
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Diego Rodrigo-Mocholí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Freddy Haesebrouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Richard Ducatelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Piet R. Deprez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Filip Van Immerseel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filip Van Immerseel.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goossens, E., Verherstraeten, S., Valgaeren, B.R. et al. Toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect against Clostridium perfringens-induced necrosis in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. BMC Vet Res 12, 101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0730-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis
  • Clostridium perfringens
  • Neutralizing antibodies
  • Alpha toxin
  • Perfringolysin O

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us

\