- Research article
- Open Access
Expression of genes involved in the T cell signalling pathway in circulating immune cells of cattle 24 months following oral challenge with Bovine Amyloidotic Spongiform Encephalopathy (BASE)
BMC Veterinary Researchvolume 11, Article number: 105 (2015)
Bovine Amyloidotic Spongiform Encephalopathy (BASE) is a variant of classical BSE that affects cows and can be transmitted to primates and mice. BASE is biochemically different from BSE and shares some molecular and histo-pathological features with the MV2 sub-type of human sporadic Creutzfeld Jakob Disease (sCJD).
The present work examined the effects of BASE on gene expression in circulating immune cells. Ontology analysis of genes differentially expressed between cattle orally challenged with brain homogenate from cattle following intracranial inoculation with BASE and control cattle identified three main pathways which were affected. Within the immune function pathway, the most affected genes were related to the T cell receptor-mediated T cell activation pathways. The differential expression of these genes in BASE challenged animals at 10,12 and 24 months following challenge, vs unchallenged controls, was investigated by real time PCR.
The results of this study show that the effects of prion diseases are not limited to the CNS, but involve the immune system and particularly T cell signalling during the early stage following challenge, before the appearance of clinical signs.
BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder that affects cattle, which was first identified in 1986 in the UK . Following the first description of BSE, the number of cases rapidly increased and reached epidemic proportions in the UK cattle population. A relatively small number of BSE cases were also found in cattle in other countries. In 1990 the appearance of a new variant of Creutzfeldt Jakob disease (vCJD) in humans was linked to food borne transmission of BSE, which caused major concerns for public health .
The key event in the pathobiology of BSE and other Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs) is the conversion of the cellular prion protein (PrPc) into an insoluble, protease-resistant isoform, PrPres. This aberrant form of the protein eventually accumulates in the central nervous system (CNS) and is associated with the onset of clinical disease . In the initial phases of classical transmissible prion diseases, such as scrapie and TSE infection via the oral route, PrPres propagates in the peripheral lymphoreticular system before transmission to the CNS . Progression of classical TSE disease requires the presence of functionally active immune cells, however, the absence of functional lymphocytes does not impair prion pathogenesis and spread to the CNS [5,6]. The pathobiology of spontaneous and atypical prion diseases, however, is not well understood.
The primary biological function of PrPc, a surface glycoprotein encoded by the PRNP gene, is still unclear. Many studies suggest that it may play a role in the regulation of ion channels and neuronal excitation . PrP may also be linked to immune function [6,8-10] as PrPc is expressed by several immune cell subsets, including T and B lymphocytes, CD34+ hematopoietic precursors, dendritic cells (DC), natural killer cells (NK), granulocytes and monocytes [11-13]. The highest expression of PrPc is observed in a sub-population of T lymphocytes, the CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T regulatory cells . PrPc is implicated in several immune processes, including T cell activation and differentiation, immune memory, monocyte activation, inflammation, DC differentiation and activation, and apoptosis of antigen presenting cells (APC) [8,9,15]. PRNP knock-out mice display impaired renewal of the CD34+ cell precursor pool, an abnormal inflammatory response and phagocytosis, limited capacity of DC to act as APC and impaired T cell activation in response to Concanavalin A (Con-A), which requires a functional T cell receptor (TCR) pathway [8,16]. Other studies have shown that PrPc interacts with the TCR in the activation of T cells [9,17,18].
All the cases of BSE identified during the major outbreak in the UK were of the same strain type . However, an atypical form of BSE, Bovine Amyloidotic Spongiform Encephalopathy (BASE), was discovered in Italy in 2004 in two old (11 and 15 year old) asymptomatic cows post mortem . Other atypical forms of BSE were subsequently reported in France, Germany and Japan [19-22]. The frequency of atypical BSE may be similar to the occurrence of sporadic CJD, which is about 1 per million individuals . BASE can be biochemically differentiated from BSE by the different mobility of PrP fragments on gel electrophoresis. BASE can also be distinguished from BSE histo-pathologically based on differences in the distribution of vacuoles in the brain. BASE shares molecular and histo-pathological features with the MV2 sub-type of human sporadic CJD (sCJD) [19,22]. BASE has been experimentally transmitted to cattle, primates, and mice [24-26].
In an earlier study  we identified genes differentially expressed between healthy cattle and cattle orally challenged with BASE at 12 months post challenge by microarray analysis. The present work examines samples from the same experimental oral challenge of cattle with BASE at additional time points post challenge, prior to the onset of disease, to assess the effects of the challenge on the expression of genes related to the T cell receptor pathway in circulating immune cells.
Animal resource and RNA preparation
Eleven Holstein heifers of approximately 4 months of age were orally challenged with 50 g brain homogenate from cows inoculated intracranially with BASE (see reference ). Challenged animal were regularly clinically monitored and blood (10 ml in EDTA) was collected at 3 month intervals from all animals from 6 months to 24 months post challenge. Ten, age and sex matched Holstein cattle sourced from two commercial farms were used as controls in the analyses. These control animals were deemed free from any obvious disease by veterinary examination.
Animal experimentation was carried out following internal ethical approval of the Istituto Sprimentale Zooprofilattico of Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, and in compliance with the legislation pertinent at the time that the BASE infection and sample collection was carried out, namely European Directive 86/609 and the Italian regulation dl 116/92. Experimental protocols were designed to respect the principle of the 3Rs and to ensure that any suffering was kept to a minimum. BASE challenged animals were inspected daily by qualified veterinary staff for signs of distress, and culling of challenged animals was carried out for sample collection for the parent study using established humane procedures.
Fresh blood was centrifuged at 250 g for 20 minutes, the buffy coat was transferred to a new tube and contaminating red blood cells were lysed with 10 ml of RBC Lysis Solution (5 Prime). RNA was extracted immediately using TRI-reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) following the instructions of the supplier. RNA obtained was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific) and quality-checked using a Bioanalyser 2100 (Agilent).
Microarray and pathway analysis at 12 months post-infection
Samples from 5 animals randomly chosen among the 11 challenged animals at 12 months post challenge (MPC), together with samples from five breed, age and sex matched healthy control Holstein cattle which were used in the analysis.
About 1 μg of RNA was amplified and labelled with Cy5-ULS following the manufacturer’s protocols (ampULSe Cat. No. GEA-022; Kreatech biotechnology). The purified aRNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and 4 μg were fragmented to a uniform size, then hybridized to a custom Bovine 90 K array (see  for array details). The hybridized arrays were scanned with a GenePix 4000B microarray scanner (Axon, Toronto, Ca) and images, in TIF format, were exported to the CombiMatrix Microarray Imager Software for hybridization quality verification and spot definition. Data were then extracted, loaded into R using the Limma analysis package and signal intensities were analyzed using the standard procedure of the Bioconductor suite . The list of differentially expressed (DE) genes was generated using the linear modeling analysis in Limma, with an adjusted P-value cut-off equal to 0.01.
A bioinformatics pipeline was created in PERL to connect the gene ID (Ensembl ID, GenBank ID or UniProt ID) with known pathways, using the information available from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.
Gene expression along the time course of infection
Confirmation and time-course studies were performed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) using samples from four of the five orally challenged cattle used for the array analysis (insufficient material was available from the 5th), and four different negative control Holstein cows obtained from a second BSE negative farm. The kinetics of expression of six selected DE genes (TCR delta chain, TRAT1, CD3E, ZAP70, LAT and LCK) was examined at 10, 12, 24 MPC.
RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase (Sigma Aldrich) for 15 minutes at room temperature and then used as a template for first-strand cDNA synthesis using the SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Primers for qRT-PCR analysis were designed using Primer Quest (Integrated DNA Technologies) and are shown in Table 1.
Real Time PCR was performed on a Applied Biosystems (ABI) PRISM 7900HT in 10 μl reactions containing 5 μl of Power SYBR®Green (Applied Biosystems), 0.2 μl of each primer at 10 μM and 3.6 μl of water. The thermal program was, 95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of amplification including two steps: 15 s at 95°C, 30s at 58°C, 30s at 60°C. Each reaction was performed in triplicate.
Results and discussion
Identification of differentially regulated genes, qRT-PCR validation and pathway analysis
The analysis of gene expression in white blood cells from 5 cattle 12 months after oral challenge with BASE, identified 140 genes differentially expressed (DE) between BASE challenged and control animals, with a log2 fold change of 1.5 or greater and a p value < 0.01. The majority of DE genes (91) were up-regulated in the BASE animals compared with controls. Gene ontology analysis using the KEGG Database identified 34 genes that fell in 3 pathways each with several genes showing affected expression (Tables 2, 3 and 4). The pathway with the largest number of affected genes was related to immune function (21) followed by signal transduction and cell growth (8) then genes coding for metabolic proteins (5). The microarray data set supporting the results of this article is available in the NCBI GEO data repository with accession number GSE67576, [see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE67576].
Immune response related genes showing altered expression 12 MPC with BASE
TCR signalling cascade
The pathway with most affected genes at 12 MPC was related to immune function with 21 DE genes, of these 11 belonged to the TCR signalling cascade which regulates the activation of T lymphocytes in response to antigen presented by the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC). Three genes involved in this pathway with differential expression (TCRβ, TCRδ, and TRAT1) were missing from the KEGG database for cow and were added manually. The pan-T cell marker, CD7, and the transcription factor TCF7/LEF were also added to the TCR pathway by manual annotation. Ten of the DE genes in the TCR cascade were up-regulated, several of which had the highest log-fold change in expression observed at 12 MPC. One gene, the transcription factor Fos, was down regulated, and is downstream of the signalling cascade.
Kinetics of expression for genes involved TCR signalling in early phases of BASE infection
As TCR signaling is central to immune function and was affected by BASE challenge, the expression of six genes involved in this pathway (TCRδ, CD3E, ZAP70, TRAT1, LAT, LCK) was analyzed over a time course following BASE challenge (10-12-24 MPC) by qPCR. The qPCR analysis confirmed the micro-array data for TCRδ, CD3E, ZAP70 and TRAT1 which were overexpressed in BASE animals vs controls at 12 MPC (respectively p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). The LAT gene also showed an increase of expression at 12 MPC but the difference compared with controls was not significant.
Expression of TCRδ, ZAP70 and CD3E was significantly higher in all 4 infected animals examined by qPCR compared with controls at all the time points post challenge. TRAT1 and LAT showed the same trend, with an increase in expression at 10 MPC and 12 MPC. TRAT 1 had statistically significant increased expression at 12 MPC (p < 0.01), then fell to the same level as control samples by 24 MPC. LCK was found to be up-regulated 1.5 fold in the microarray data at 12 MPC but in the qPCR analysis was down-regulated at 12 MPC (p < 0.01), and also had lower expression than controls at 10 and 24 MPC (see Figure 1).
Interestingly, PrPc has been found to co-precipitate with the TCR [8,18] and with components of the TCR signaling pathway , many of which appear among the DE genes identified in the present study (ZAP70, LCK, CD3E, LAT). The physiological function of PrPC is not fully understood, however, it has been implicated in T cell activation after the binding of the antigen . T cell activation increases PrPc concentration on the surface of human lymphocytes . In addition antibodies against PrPc block ConA induced lymphocyte proliferation, which requires a functional TCR complex . How the function of PrP is altered with the change in conformation from PrPc to PrPres is unclear, although there are some suggestions that there is a gain in function and not simply a loss. PrPres is able to stimulate MAP kinase signaling in neuronal cells whereas PrPC is not . In, changes in the level of PrP expression are likely to affect cell function e.g. lack of PrP expression on antigen presenting cells affects T cell activation , whereas lack of PrP expression on the T cell itself does not inhibit T cell activation. Nevertheless, the level of PrP is increased following activation. Thus perturbed PrP expression or function, as may occur in the change from PrPC to PrPres, is likely to change the dynamics of T cell activation and expression of genes associated with the T cell receptor complex. In the present study, expression of TCRδ, ZAP 70, CD3E, LCK and TRAT was found to change between 10 and 24 month after the BASE challenge. qPCR analysis suggested that LCK was down regulated during early infection (10–24 MPC), which is of interest as this kinase is a key regulator of the TCR pathway. Following the interaction between the TCR and CD3, LCK is recruited to the TCR complex, phosphorylates downstream signaling molecules including ZAP70, and activates a phosphorylation cascade that involves LAT and TRAT [31,32]. This suggests that T cell response is indeed affected following BASE challenge.
Genes linked to the inflammatory response
The data presented here also indicate that BASE challenge of cattle is associated with a modified inflammatory response. Expression of ALOX12 and ALOX5, which encode proteins that are key effectors of an inflammatory response were down-regulated at 12 MPC. ALOX12 and ALOX5 have a role in chemotaxis and response in tissue damage  and are involved in Arachidonic acid metabolism, which is necessary for Leukotrien production. Leukotriens are key effectors of the inflammatory response  and are produced by leukocytes, in particular mast-cells. C5L2 is one of the two receptors for the C5a anaphylotoxin, an extremely potent pro-inflammatory peptide , which was also down regulated following BASE challenge. Other pro-inflammatory cytokines or their receptors (IL1β, CCR1, IL8βR and NCF1) were also down-regulated.
Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) was up-regulated. S1PR1 is involved in the regulation of inflammatory responses, cell migration and differentiation , and the receptor for platelet activating factor (PTARF), a key inflammatory mediator and a pattern recognition receptor involved in the uptake of Gram-positive bacteria . The ID3 gene, which codes for an anti-inflammatory cytokine involved in the TGFβ1 pathway, was also up-regulated. The expression of genes in the TGFβ1 pathway has previously been reported to be up-regulated following prion infection of mice and cattle [37,38]. The results presented here are consistent with previous data, and suggest that prion diseases are associated with an inhibition of inflammation . It is therefore interesting that the expression of IL-8Rβ and NCF1, which are directly linked to chemotaxis of neutrophils, was reduced in BASE challenged animals compared with controls. These results are in agreement with previous studies which proposed that PrPc has a role in the modulation of inflammation and phagocytosis , which was also seen in studies of PrP null mice .
HCST, a signal transduction protein involved in NK and T cell activity, especially during anti-viral responses, was up-regulated.
Metabolic and signal transduction genes of WBC affected by BASE at 12 months post-challenge
In addition to immune function related genes, other pathways were affected by BASE infection, including genes involved in energy metabolism and signal transduction, which are discussed here for completeness.
Energy metabolism and storage
Several genes involved in energy metabolism and storage of carbohydrates (F16P1, SDHL) and also genes regulating lipid metabolism and signalling (DGAT2, LIPL), were down regulated in BASE challenged cattle compared with controls at 12 MPC. However, cardiolipin synthase 1 (CRLS1), which is involved in mitochondrial membrane function and is predominantly expressed by tissues with high levels of energy metabolism, was up-regulated. SDHL, which is associated with energy balance, has previously been shown to be affected by TSE diseases. Previous work has shown that proteins related to glucose metabolism have aberrant expression in cerebrospinal fluid of sCJD patients . Patients with sporadic CJD have also been shown to have altered levels of proteins associated with the control of glucose  and lipid  metabolism. Changes in glucose metabolism are known to trigger apoptotic pathways  while changes in lipid metabolism and signalling are one of the early changes apparent in many neurodegenerative diseases, including prion diseases . Therefore this response, while linked to BASE challenge in this study, is not likely to be specific for prion disease.
Cell signalling genes
Two genes involved in signal transduction (STMN1, CDC25B), which code for proteins of the MAP kinase pathway (MAPK), were up-regulated, while a negative regulator of this pathway (DUSP2) was down-regulated in challenged animals at 12 MPC. MAPK pathways are essential for cell survival and were up regulated. It has been suggested that MAPK has a role in the protective response to cellular oxidative stress . Previous studies have reported that MAPK proteins interact with PrPc . These genes are also known to play an active role in prion disease pathogenesis in nervous tissues and the medulla, with the sequential activation of the various MAPK associated genes during PrPres deposition [37,40]. MAPK pathway genes have been shown to be up regulated in brain tissues of scrapie infected hamster  and mice , and in the medulla of cattle following oral challenge with BSE . This is consistent with data which showed that PrPc interacts with MAPK proteins .
Genes in other signal transduction pathways also showed changes in expression 12 MPC. CSDA is a member of the highly conserved Cold Shock Domain family of DNA binding proteins which is involved in post-transcriptional control of gene expression [42,43] and was up regulated. The gene coding for histone H2A was down-regulated. Histone 2A is known to co-purify with PrPres extracted from the brains of hamsters infected with experimental scrapie .
Expression of the gene coding for thrombin receptor (F2R) was up regulated, while the plasminogen activator urokinase (PLAU), was down-regulated. Expression of genes involved in coagulation have also been shown to be affected in the brain of cattle incubating BSE .
The BASE challenged animals used for the expression analysis remained healthy up to the 24 month time-point examined here. The parent study which provided the samples in still in progress, and therefore further information on the health status of the animals is not yet available. Data presented here are consistent with that from the earlier study , and all animals studied displayed a consistent change in gene expression in comparison with controls, suggesting that they were responding to the BASE challenge. It should also be noted that while challenged animals were housed in a containment facility, controls were taken from two commercial farms. Hence controls and challenged animals experienced different environments, which may have resulted in differences in expression patterns. DE genes between the challenged animals and controls were consistent between the two control groups, which experienced different management regimes. The DE genes and pathways identified between controls and challenged animals are consistent with those reported in other TSE infection models as discussed above. This give some confidence in these data and that the effects of orally administered BASE on gene expression are similar to other TSEs.
The data presented here on gene expression in circulating immune cells following BASE challenge show that response to BASE has similarities with other prion diseases. PrPc is known to have a role in the immune system, indeed it is expressed on DC and is important for inducing the T cell proliferative response . Moreover, PrPc accumulates in the contact point between T cells and DC, and it may have a role in the assembly of the TCR complex . The disease form of this protein (PrPres) has been shown to affect the immune system, e.g. eliciting qualitative differences in the responses of T cells . Moreover, macrophages accumulate PrPres, and may be involved in the transfer of the disease to the CNS [9,47]. The data presented here are consistent with the hypothesis that the effects of TSE diseases are not limited to CNS, but involve the immune system, especially during the early stages following challenge, before the appearance of clinical signs. Our data suggest that BASE challenge affects the TCR signalling pathway, which has also been shown in mouse knock-out experiments . BASE therefore, in common with other prion diseases, seems to be associated with general cellular stress and impaired immune function. These data, from experimentally challenged cattle, suggest that orally administered BASE affects gene expression in circulating immune cells even in the absence of overt disease.
Bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
Central nervous system
Differentially expressed (genes)
Months post challenge
Polymerase chain reaction
Cellular prion protein
Sporadic Creutzfeld Jakob disease
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
T cell receptor
White blood cells
Wells GA, Scott AC, Johnson CT, Gunning RF, Hancock RD, Jeffrey M, et al. A novel progressive spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. Vet Rec. 1987;121:419–20.
Will RG, Ironside JW, Ziedler M, Cousens SN, Estibero K, Alperovich A, et al. A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet. 1996;347:921–5.
Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216:136–44.
Aucouturier P, Geissmann F, Damotte D, Saborio GP, Meeker HC, Kascsak R, et al. Infected splenic dendritic cells are sufficient for prion transmission to the CNS in mouse scrapie. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:703–8.
Aguzzi A, Heppner FL, Heikenwalder M, Prinz M, Mertz K, Seeger H, et al. Immune system and peripheral nerves in propagation of prions to CNS. Br Med Bull. 2003;66:141–59.
Nuvolone M, Aguzzi A, Heikenwalder M. Cells and prions: a license to replicate. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:2674–84.
Biasini E, Turnbaugh J, Unterberger U, Harris DA. Prion protein at the crossroad of physiology and disease. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:92–103.
Isaacs JD, Jackson GS, Altmann DM. The role of the cellular prion protein in the immune system. Clin Exp Immunol. 2006;146:1–8.
Linden R, Martins VR, Prado MAM, Cammarota M, Izquierdo I, Brentani RR. Physiology of the prion protein. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:673–728.
Zomosa-Signoret V, Arnaud JD, Fontes P, Alvarez-Maryinez MT, Liautard JP. Physiological role of the cellular prion protein. Vet Res. 2008;39:9–25.
Castro-Seoane R, Hummerich H, Sweeting T, Tattum MH, Linehan JM, Fernandez de Marco M, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sequester high prion titres at early stages of prion infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:201.
Starke R, Harrison P, Mackie I, Wang G, Erusalimsky JD, Gale R, et al. The expression of prion protein (PrP(C)) in the megakaryocyte lineage. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1266–73.
Dorban G, Defaweux V, Heinen E, Antoine N. Spreading of prions from the immune to the peripheral nervous system: a potential implication of dendritic cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010;133:493–504.
Isaacs JD, Garden OA, Kaur G, Collinge J, Jackson GS, Altmann DM. The cellular prion protein is preferentially expressed by CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Immunology. 2008;125:313–9.
Jeon JW, Park BC, Jung JG, Jang YS, Shin EC, Park WP. The soluble form of the cellular prion protein enhances phagocytic activity and cytokine production by human monocytes via activation of ERK and NF-κB. Immune Netw. 2013;13:148–56.
Mazzoni IE, Lederbur HC, Paramithiotis E, Cashman N. Lymphoid signal transduction mechanisms linked to cellular prion protein. Cell Biol. 2005;83:644–53.
Hu W, Nessler S, Hemmer B, Eagar TN, Kane LP, Rutger-Leliveld S, et al. Pharmacological prion protein silencing accelerates central nervous system autoimmune disease via T cell receptor signalling. Brain. 2010;133:375–88.
Mattei V, Garofalo T, Misasi R, Circella A, Manganelli V, Lucania G, et al. Prion protein is a component of the multicellular signaling complex involved in T cell activation. FEBS Lett. 2004;560:14–8.
Casalone G, Zanusso G, Acutis P, Ferrari S, Cappucci L, Tagliavini F, et al. Identification of a second bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy: molecular similarities with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3065–70.
Béringue V, Bencsik A, Le Dur A, Reine F, Lani TL, Chenais N, et al. Isolation from cattle of a prion strain distinct from that causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e112.
Biacabe AG, Laplanche JL, Ryder S, Baron T. Distinct molecular phenotypes in bovine prion diseases. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:110–4.
Yokoyama T, Mohri S. Prion diseases and emerging prion diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:912–6.
Brown P, McShane LM, Zanusso G, Detwiler L. On the question of sporadic or atypical bovine spongiform encephalopathy and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1816–21.
Comoy EE, Casalone C, Lescoutra-Etchegarray N, Zanusso G, Freire S, Marcè D, et al. Atypical BSE (BASE) transmitted from asymptomatic aging cattle to a primate. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3017.
Fukuda S, Iwamaru Y, Imamura M, Masujin K, Shimizu Y, Matsuura Y, et al. Intraspecies transmission of L-type-like bovine spongiform encephalopathy detected in Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53:704–7.
Lombardi G, Casalone C, D’Angelo A, Gelmetti D, Torcoli G, Torcoli G, et al. Intraspecies transmission of BASE induces clinical dullness and amyotrophic changes. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000075.
Panelli S, Strozzi F, Capoferri R, Barbieri I, Martinelli N, Capucci L, et al. Analysis of gene expression in white blood cells of cattle orally challenged with Bovine Amyloidotic Spongiform Encephalopathy. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2011;74:96–102.
Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3(No. 1):Article 3. Berkeley Electronic Press.
Marella M, Gaggioli C, Batoz M, Deckert M, Tartare-Deckert S, Chabry J. Pathological prion protein exposure switches on neuronal mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway resulting in microglia recruitment. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1529–34.
Ballerini C, Gourdain P, Bachy V, Blanchard N, Levavasseur E, Grégoire S, et al. Functional implication of cellular prion protein in antigen-driven interactions between T cells and dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:7254–62.
Davis SJ, van der Merwe PA. Lck and the nature of the T cell receptor trigger. Trend Immunol. 2011;32:1–5.
Kirchgessner H, Dietrich J, Scherer J, Isomaki P, Korinek V, Hilgert I, et al. The Transmembrane Adaptor Protein TRIM Regulates T Cell Receptor (TCR) Expression and TCR-mediated signaling via an association with the TCR ζ chain. J Exp Med. 2001;193:1269–83.
Stables MJ, Gilroy DW. Old and new generation lipid mediators in acute inflammation and resolution. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50:35–51.
Ward PA. Functions of C5a receptors. J Mol Med. 2009;87:375–8.
Van Doorn R, Van Horssen J, Verzil D, Witte M, Ronken E, Van Het Hof B, et al. De Vries HE:Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 3 are upregulated in multiple sclerosis lesions. Glia. 2010;58:1465–6.
Fillon S, Soulis K, Rajasekaran S, Benedict-Hamilton H, Radin JN, Orihuela CJ, et al. Murti, Kaushal D, Waaled-Gaber M, Weber JR, Murray PJ. Tuomanen E: Platelet-activating factor receptor and innate immunity: uptake of gram-positive cell wall into host cells and cell-specific pathophysiology J Immunol. 2006;177:6182.
Sorensen G, Medina S, Parchaliuk D, Phillipson C, Robertson C, Booth SA: Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of prion infection in mouse reveals networks of responsive genes. BMC Genomics 2008, 3: 9:114.
Almeida LM, Basu U, Khaniya B, Taniguchi M, Williams JL, Moore SS. Guan LL:Gene expression in the medulla following oral infection of cattle with bovine spongiform encephalopathy. J Toxicol Environm Health A. 2011;74:110–26.
Gawinecka J, Dieks J, Asif AR, Carimalo J, Heinemann U, Streich J-H, et al. Codon 129 polymorphism specific cerebrospinal fluid proteome pattern in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and the implication of glycolytic enzymes in prion-induced pathology. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:5646–57.
Lee HP, Jun YC, Choi JK, Kim JI, Carp RI, Kim YS. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in hamster brains infected with 263K scrapie agent. J Neurochem. 2005;95:584–93.
Satoh J, Obayashi S, Misawa T, Sumiyoshi K, Oosumi K, Tabunoki H. Protein microarray analysis identifies human cellular prion protein interactors. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35:16–35.
Mihailovich M, Militti C, Gabaldon T, Gebauer F. Eukaryotic cold shock domain proteins: highly versatile regulators of gene expression. Bioessays. 2010;32:109–18.
Saito Y, Nakagami H, Azuma N, Hirata S, Sanada F, Taniyama Y, et al. Critical roles of Cold Shock Domain Protein A as an endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor in skeletal muscle. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15:2109–20.
Giorgi A, Di Francesco L, Principe S, Mignogna G, Sennels L, Mancone C, et al. Proteomic profiling of prP27-30-enriched preparations extracted from the brain of hamsters with experimental scrapie. Proteomics. 2009;9:3802–14.
Hugel B, Martinez MC, Kunzelmann C, Blattler T, Aguzzi A, Freyssinet JM. Modulation of signal transduction through the cellular prion protein is linked to its incorporation in lipid rafts. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:2998–3007.
Khalili-Shirazi A, Quaratino S, Londei M, Summers L, Tayebi M, Clarke AR, et al. Protein conformation significantly influences immune responses to prion protein. J Immunol. 2005;174:3256–63.
Elhelaly AE, Inoshima Y, Ishiguro N. Characterization of early transient accumulation of PrPsc in immune cells. Bioch. and Bioph. Res Comm. 2013;439:340–5.
This work was supported by grant PRC2005013 from the Italian Health Ministry to G.L. AT was supported by grant PON01_01841 from the Italian Ministry of Science.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AT carried out the confirmation study, participated in the data analysis and writing the manuscript, SP carried out the micro-array study and the initial analysis, FS designed the micro-array and participated in the data analysis, CC designed and carried out qPCR confirmation of some of the differentially expressed genes, IB and NM were responsible for collection and management of biological samples, GL set up the BASE challenge and oversaw the management of animals, RC prepared and managed the RNA samples for analysis, JLW conceived the study, oversaw the work and was responsible for drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.