Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Veterinary Research

Open Access

Establishment of a mouse model to express bovine CD14 short hairpin RNA

BMC Veterinary Research201511:36

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0353-5

Received: 10 June 2014

Accepted: 6 February 2015

Published: 15 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) functions as a co-receptor for Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 and myeloid differentiation factor (MD)-2 in detecting bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Together, these complexes promote the phagocytosis and digestion of Gram-negative bacteria, and initiate immune responses. To date, much of our understanding of CD14 function during Gram-negative bacterial inflammation comes from studies on mouse knockout models and cell transfection. To identify the effect of CD14 knockdown in this process in large livestock animals, we established a mouse model expressing bovine CD14 short hairpin (sh) RNA. shRNA fragments targeting bovine CD14 were screened by co-transfection in HEK 293 cells, and the most effective CD14 shRNA fragment was cloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pSilencer4.1-CD14 shRNA-IRES (internal ribosome entry site) and transferred into mouse zygotes by pronuclear microinjection to obtain transgenic mice. Expression of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter and genes related to the TLR4 signaling pathway was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively.

Results

One effective shRNA fragment (shRNA-674) targeting bovine CD14 was obtained, the sequence of which was shown to be conserved between cows, buffalos, sheep, and humans. Thirty-seven founder pups were obtained by pronuclear microinjection, of which three were positive for the transgene. In the F1 generation, 11 of 33 mice (33%) were positive for the transgene as detected by PCR. IHC analysis detected exogenous EGFP expression in the liver, kidney, and spleen of transgenic F1 mice, indicating that they were chimeric. The expression of endogenous CD14 mRNA in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney of transgenic F1 mice was decreased 8-, 3-, 19.5-, 6-, and 11-fold, respectively. The expression patterns of endogenous MD-2, TLR4, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α genes in transgenic mice also varied.

Conclusions

This study confirms that transgenic mice expressing bovine CD14 shRNA can be generated by pronuclear microinjection, and demonstrates inhibited endogenous mouse CD14 expression that alters gene expression related to the TLR4 signaling pathway.

Keywords

Bovine CD14 shRNAMouse modelTLR4Gene expression

Background

CD14 is a 55 kDa glycoprotein expressed mainly on the surface of monocytes, macrophages, and granulocytes [1], which plays a crucial role in the inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [2-4]. Currently, LPS-induced cellular activation is thought to occur through signal complexes comprised of CD14 and either myeloid differentiation factor (MD)-2 or Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 [5-7]. LPS binding to these complexes facilitates activation of the TLR4/nuclear factor (NF)-κB inflammatory pathway, ultimately leading to the production of proatherogenic cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-1 [8-11].

Strategies aimed at inhibiting the expression of TLR4 complex genes have been used to analyze their contribution to inflammatory reactions [12-14]. In addition to inhibiting TLR4 expression, many CD14-deficient mice have also been established by CD14 knockout strategies [15-17]. When infected by live Gram-negative bacteria or LPS, CD14-deficient mice demonstrate reduced bacteremia and systemic inflammation [18]. Thus, inhibiting signals through CD14 may limit the release of a broad range of inflammatory mediators, and prevent rapid bacterial dissemination following infection by Gram-negative bacteria [1,19-22].

Numerous approaches using monoclonal antibodies, small molecule antagonists, and RNA interference have demonstrated that inhibiting LPS signals through lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, CD14, MD-2, and TLR4 reduce the release of inflammatory cytokines [20,23-26]. For instance, small interfering (si) RNA targeting CD14 in the mouse cell line RAW264.7 was found to inhibit the release of TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, IL-6, and the production of nitric oxide following exposure to LPS [27]. Thus far, most of our understanding about the role of CD14 during Gram-negative bacterial inflammation comes from studies of mouse knockout models or mouse and human immune cells. However, because of the serious harm caused by bacterial infections such as mastitis and Brucella in large livestock animals and huge resultant losses to the breeding industry, it is essential to establish knockout models of such animals to investigate the CD14 role in LPS-induced inflammation. This would also be of benefit in the development of a practical and effective measure to prevent bacterial infection in livestock. Based on our previous discovery of the effect of CD14 down-regulation in buffalo monocytes/macrophages [28], the present study aimed to establish a transgenic mouse model to express bovine CD14 short hairpin (sh) RNA, and to determine the effect of endogenous mouse CD14 down-regulation on gene expression of the mouse TLR4 signaling pathway.

Results

Screening of shRNA sequences targeting bovine CD14

Given the importance of CD14 in LPS signaling, we first sought to screen shRNA sequences for their ability to inhibit bovine CD14 expression in vitro. Using ABI siRNA online software (http://www.ambion.com), three different sites of the bovine CD14 mRNA sequence (GenBank Accession No. NM_174008.1) were used to design three CD14 shRNA sequences (shRNA-279, −326, and −674). CD14 shRNA lentiviral expression vectors with human U6 promoters were constructed (pSicoR-CD14 shRNA-279/326/674), and lentiviral particles were produced using the calcium-phosphate method, with titers reaching 1 × 107 (data not shown). Lentiviral particles expressing bovine CD14 shRNA were used to infect HEK 293 cells expressing CD14 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100, using a non-infected cell line as blank control, the scrambled shRNA as negative control. The infected cells were harvested 72 h after infection and total RNA was extracted for quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses. As expected, cells infected with the shRNA-negative control showed no reduction in CD14 expression (Figure 1A). Compared with scrambled shRNA-1864, shRNA-279 and shRNA-326 fragments were also unable to reduce bovine CD14 expression. However, the shRNA-674 fragment significantly inhibited CD14 mRNA expression in vitro (p < 0.01) (Figure 1A). shRNA-674 nucleotides were highly conserved between cows, sheep, buffalos, and humans, indicating that this shRNA fragment could potentially be used in related research of multiple species.
Figure 1

Screening of bovine CD14 shRNA and construction of its eukaryotic expression vector. A. Effect of designed bovine CD14 shRNAs was detected by qRT-PCR analysis. The lentiviral particles expressing CD14 shRNAs were used to infect HEK 293 cells expressing bovine CD14, non-infected cell line as a blank control, the scrambled shRNA as negative control. The values for columns with different letters represent statistically significant differences, p < 0.01. B. The inhibition effect of CD14 shRNA-674 fragment was confirmed by western blot analysis. HEK 293 cells stably expressing bovine CD14 were infected by shRNA-674 lentivirus at two different MOIs (lane1, 2), the negative control was HEK 293 cells stably expressing bovine CD14 (lane 3). C. Identification of the pSilencer™4.1-CD14-IRES recombinant plasmid. M: 1 kb Marker; Lane1: pSilencer™4.1-CD14shRNA-IRES plasmid: Lane2: pSilencer™4.1-CD14shRNA-IRES plasmid digested by SspI enzyme; Lane3: pSilencer™4.1-CD14shRNA-IRES plasmid digested by HpaI and BamHI enzyme. D. Map of pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-IRES vector. E. Confirmation of F1 generation transgenic mice by Southern blot analysis. Three F1 mice were selected, among them, two (offspring of 22#, 32#) were transgenic while the third was not (offspring of 11#) by RT-PCR analysis. The positive control was pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-674-IRES plasmid. M: Marker; Lane 1: positive control; Lane 2: offspring of 22# mouse; Lane 3: offspring of 11# mouse; Lane 4: offspring of 32# mouse.

To confirm if the shRNA-674 fragment also reduced expression of the CD14 protein, we performed western blot analysis. At two different MOIs, the intracellular expression of shRNA-674 completely abolished CD14 protein expression (Figure 1B), which was consistent with RT-PCR analysis.

shRNA transgenic mice demonstrated reduced CD14 expression

We next determined the effects of the shRNA-674 fragment on CD14 expression in vivo. To avoid the biological safety problems of lentiviruses, the shRNA-674 fragment was inserted into the eukaryotic shRNA expression vector pSilencer™4.1-CMV neo. Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements were then ligated with the vector to construct the pSilencer4.1-CD14 shRNA-674-IRES plasmid (Figure 1). This plasmid was linearized with Nhe I digestion and microinjected into the pronucleus of fertilized eggs from FVB mice to create CD14 shRNA transgenic mice. After transferring two-cell stage embryos into pseudo-pregnant females, a total of 37 founder pups were obtained. Transgene integration in F0 offspring was analyzed by amplifying EGFP and neo genes that were both amplified in three founder mice (8.1%): one male (11#) and two females (22#, 32#) that were regarded as transgenic. Within the F1 generation (wild-type mouse with transgenic F0 mouse cross), 33 mice were born, of which 11 were found to be transgenic (33.3%; data not shown). In the 11 transgenic F1 mice, 3 was offspring of 11# F0 mouse, 5 and 3 were offspring of 22# and 32# mouse respectively. Three of the 33 F1 mice were selected for Southern blot analysis to confirm the PCR data. Two (lane2, 4, offspring of 22#, 32# respectively) were transgenic while the third was not (lane3, offspring of 11#) (Figure 1E). These findings were consistent with PCR results (data not shown).

To further characterize the transgene insertion, organs of F1 transgenic mice (offspring of 22#) were analyzed for eGFP expression by confocal microscopy. This protein was shown to be expressed in the liver, kidney, and spleen tissue of all transgenic mice, with the highest expression detected in the spleen. However, eGFP expression was absent from heart and lung tissues. The expression pattern was similar in both male and female mice (Figure 2). Together these data demonstrated that the transgenic mice were chimeric.
Figure 2

The immunohistochemistry results of eGFP expression in tissues of CD14 shRNA transgenic mice under confocal microscopy. Upper row: spleen; Middle row: liver; Lower row: kidney. Left parts were male samples, and right were female samples.

To explore if the transferred shRNA fragment affected the expression of endogenous CD14 mRNA in vivo, we used qRT-PCR to analyze the relative expression of CD14 expression in tissues of F1 transgenic mice (offspring of 22#). Compared with non-transgenic mouse RNA samples, the expression of endogenous CD14 mRNA in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney tissues of transgenic mice was reduced 8-, 3-, 19.5-, 6-, and 11 fold, respectively (Figure 3). Thus, the expression of endogenous CD14 mRNA was inhibited in transgenic mice.
Figure 3

Expression of endogenous CD14 , TLR4 , MD-2 , TNF-α , and IL-6 mRNA in CD14 shRNA transgenic mice. qRT-PCR was used to assess target gene expression in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney of F1 transgenic mice. Wild-type mice were used as negative controls. Different letters represent statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.

We next examined the expression pattern of genes in the TLR4 signaling pathway. TLR4 demonstrated a significantly increased expression level in the heart and liver of CD14 shRNA transgenic mice compared with wild-type mice (p < 0.05), although there were no significant differences in expression in the spleen, lung, or kidney between transgenic and wild-type mice. MD-2, TNF-α, and IL-6 transcripts showed similar expression patterns, except for the kidney, with significantly increased expression in the heart, liver, and lung (p < 0.05), and significantly lower expression in the spleen (p < 0.05) compared with wild-type mice. Exogenous neo expression showed the same pattern as that of MD-2 and IL-6 (Figure 3) but with greater differences between transgenic and wild-type mice. Together, these results revealed the successful generation of a mouse model expressing bovine CD14 shRNA, and indicated that the inhibition of exogenous CD14 expression altered the expression levels of genes in the TLR4 signaling pathway in vivo.

Discussion

Several studies have previously demonstrated that CD14 plays a crucial role in the inflammatory response to LPS [2-4]. In the CD14-dependent signaling pathway, CD14 binds to LPS and facilitates activation of the TLR4/NF-κB inflammatory pathway [28]. Upstream inhibition of the bacterial LPS/TLR4/CD14-mediated inflammation pathway has been proven to be an effective therapeutic approach for attenuating dysfunctional immune activation [20,29]. However, very few studies have investigated the role of CD14 in LPS-induced inflammation in large livestock animals such as sheep, cows, and buffalos. Nevertheless, this is of particular importance because of the multiple reproductive and veterinary problems associated with these species, and the need to develop a practical and effective measure to prevent bacterial infections in livestock.

We previously found that knockdown of endogenous CD14 had clear regulatory effects on the signal transduction of TLR4 after stimulation with LPS in buffalo monocyte/macrophages in vitro [28]. To determine if CD14 knockdown had similar effects in large livestock animals in vivo, it is first necessary to establish a mouse model expressing bovine CD14 shRNA. This model would provide basic data about CD14 knockdown on animal development, gene expression in the CD14-dependent signaling pathway, and most importantly on toxicity experiments. Future work could then build on these data and establish a larger animal model with the aim of developing novel therapeutic interventions to inflammatory diseases caused by Gram-negative bacteria.

Conclusions

We successfully generated a mouse model expressing bovine CD14 shRNA by pronuclear microinjection. Moreover, we showed that the inhibited expression of exogenous CD14 shRNA altered the expression levels of some genes in the TLR4 signaling pathway in transgenic mice.

Methods

All experiments and protocols were performed in strict accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals from the Guangxi University Committee on Animal Research and Bioethics, the committee explicitly approved the animal study.

Reagents and antibodies

All chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise stated. TCM-199 powder was purchased from Gibco BRL (Paisley, Scotland, UK), and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT). The pSilencer4.1 vector (Life technology, USA), the pEF-EGFP-IRES-neo-SV40-polyA vector, and the pSicoR-GFP vector were generated or maintained by our laboratory. The anti-buffalo CD14 primary antibody was kindly provided by Dr. Wang Fengyang (Hainan University, Haikou, China).

Bovine CD14 cloning and expression vector construction

The bovine CD14 coding sequence fragment (1,340 bp) was cloned by RT-PCR, confirmed by sequencing, and used to construct the pDsRed1-N1-bovine CD14 fusion vector by inserting the CD14 fragment into the SalIand SacII sites. This plasmid was then transfected into HEK 293 cells using Lipofectamine® LTX reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and cell lines that stably expressed bovine CD14 were selected using G418 selection.

shRNA design and synthesis

Using ABI siRNA online software (http://www.lifetechnologies.com/cn/zh/home/life-science/rnai/synthetic-rnai-analysis/ambion-silencer-select-sirnas/silencer-select-sirna.html?ICID=search-am16704), three different regions of the bovine CD14 mRNA sequence (GenBank Accession No. NM_174008.1) were used to design CD14 shRNA sequences, which were synthesized by Nanjing GenScript Co. (Nanjing, China). A universal shRNA scramble control (NC) sequence was also purchased (Cat. No. 1864, Open Biosystem, Huntsville, AL). The 71 bp oligonucleotide sequence of each shRNA fragment followed the same pattern: 5′-Xho I-CCGG-shRNA (sense strand)-TTGAAGAGA (loop structure)-shRNA (antisense strand)-TTTTTT-Not I-3′ (Table 1). shRNA lentiviral expression vectors were constructed by inserting the synthesized shRNA fragments into the pSicoR-GFP vector (Addgene, USA) after digestion with Xho I and Not I. These vectors are referred to as pSicoR-GFP-CD14 shRNA (279/326/674) and scrambled shRNA-1864. The constructed shRNA lentiviral vectors were confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing.
Table 1

The designed shRNA sequences of the bovine CD14 gene

Name

Duplexes of DNA coding specific shRNA (5’-3’)

shRNA-674

S 5 ’-GCCTAGACCTGTCTGACAATTTCAAGAGAATTGTCAGACAGGTCTAGGC-3’

AS 5’-CGGATCTGGACAGACTGTTAAAGTTCTCTTAACAGTCTGTCCAGATCCG-3’

shRNA-279

S 5’-GCCTGGAACAGTTTCTCAAGGTTCAAGAGACCTTGAGAAACTGTTCCAGGC-3’

AS 5’-CGGACCTTGTCAAAGAGTTCCAAGTTCTCTGGAACTCTTTGACAAGGTCCG-3’

shRNA-326

S 5’-GCTGACACAATCAAGGCTCTGTTCAAGAGACAGAGCCTTGATTGTGTCAGC-3’

AS 5’-CGACTGTGTTAGTTCCGAGACAAGTTCTCTGTCTGGCAACTAACACAGTCG-3’

Scrambled shRNA-1864

S 5’-CTCGAGCCGGCCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCGCTCG AGCGAGGGCGACTTAACCTTAGGTTTTTTGGCGGCCGC-3’

AS 5’-GCGGCCGCCAAAAAACCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTC GCTCGAGCGAGGGCGACTTAACCTTAGGCCGGCTCGAG-3’

Lentivirus packaging and titer determination

Lentiviral particles were produced as previously described [30]. The pSicoR-GFP CD14 shRNA vector was co-transfected into 293 T cells with vesicularstomatitis virusG (VSVG) and NRF plasmids using the calcium-phosphate method [30]. Supernatant was harvested 48–72 h after transfection, centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to remove cellular debris, and filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane. Viral titers were determined using a serial dilution method in 293 T cells [30].

Screening of shRNA sequences targeting bovine CD14

shRNA sequences were screened by infecting HEK293 cells expressing bovine CD14 with lentiviral particles containing different CD14 shRNAs. Cells were harvested 72 h after infection and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent. The inhibition effects of each shRNA sequence on CD14 were quantified using qRT-PCR and western blot analysis.

For qRT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, USA), digested with DNaseI (Tiangen, Beijing) to remove contaminating genomic DNA, then reverse transcribed into cDNA using AMV reverse transcriptase (Takara, Dalian) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was diluted to 100 ng/μL for subsequent TaqMan quantitative PCR analysis (ABI 7500) using the probes and primers listed in Table 2. PCR conditions were: 94°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. Duplicate PCR experiments were performed for each transcript. The comparative Ct method was used for the relative quantification of target gene expression levels (ABI Prism Sequence Detection System). The histone H2a gene was used for normalization. Within the log-linear phase region of the amplification curve, fold-changes in the relative mRNA expression of the target gene were determined using the formula 2-ΔΔCT.
Table 2

The primers used in the paper

Gene

Primer sequences

Fragment length (bp)

Histone H2a

Forward: 5’-AACAAGCTGCTGGGCAAAGT-3’

80

Reverse: 5’-TTATGGTGGCTCTCCGTCTTCT-3’

Probe: 5’-CCCAACATCCAGGCCGTGCTG-3’

CD14

Forward: 5’-CCGTTCAGTGGTAATGGTTGC-3’

100

Reverse: 5’-TGGTGTCGGCTCCCTTGAG-3’

Probe: 5’-CCGCCCGCCACTGATCTTCCCACCTCTT-3’

EGFP

Forward: 5’- ACGTAAACGGCCACAAGTTC -3’

440

Reverse: 5’- GATCTTGAAGTTCACCTTGATGC -3’

Neo

Forward: 5’- AGAGGCTATTCGGCTATGAC -3’

211

Reverse: 5’-GCTTCAGTGACAACGTCGAG -3’

IRES

Forward: 5'-CGGAATATTATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTATCTTCCGACATTGATTATTGAC-3'

4300

Reverse: 5'-CGGAATATTATAACTTCGTATAGCATACATTATACGAAGTTATGATCCAGACATGATAAGATAC-3'

TLR4

Forward: 5’-CTGCCTGAGAACCGAGAGTTG-3’

300

Reverse: 5’-GCTCCATGCACTGGTAACTAATGT-3’

IL-6

Forward: 5’- ATCAGAACACTGATCCAGATCC-3’

300

Reverse: 5’-CAAGGTTTCTCAGGATGAGG-3’

TNF-α

Forward: 5’-GCTCCAGAAGTTGCTTGTGC-3’

300

Reverse: 5’-AACCAGAGGGCTGTTGATGG-3’

MD2

Forward: GAGTTGCCGAAGCGTAAG

213

Reverse: GCGGTGAATGATGGTGAA

β-actin

Forward: 5’-GCCCTGGCACCCAGCACAAT-3’

150

Reverse: 5’-GGAGGGGCCGGACTCATCGT-3’

Western blot analysis was performed using standard protocols. The primary antibody was a rabbit anti-bovine CD14 polyclonal (1:200) (a gift from Dr. Fengyang Wang), and the secondary antibody was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China; 1:1,000). Bovine CD14 shRNA-674 lentivirus was used to infect HEK 293 cells stably expressing bovine CD14 at two different MOIs, 50 and 100 respectively. The cells were harvested at 72 h after infection, HEK 293 cells stably expressing bovine CD14 were used as negative controls.

Construction of CD14 shRNA-674 eukaryotic expression vector

The pSilencer™4.1-CMV neo and pSicoR-CD14 shRNA-674 plasmids were first digested with BamHI and HindIII, respectively, then the CD14 shRNA-674 fragment was inserted into the pSilencer™4.1-CMV neo backbone to construct the pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA plasmid. The IRES fragment was amplified by PCR using pEF-EGFP-IRES-neo-SV40-polyA vector as template and primer sequences listed in Table 2. It was then ligated with pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-674 to construct the pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-674-IRES plasmid. Plasmid construction was confirmed by enzyme digestion and cell transfection experiments.

Generation and detection of transgenic mice

The pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-674-IRES cassette was digested with Nhe I (Takara, Dalian, China) and purified by gel extraction (Qiagen, USA). The purified fragment was then microinjected into the pronucleus of 200 fertilized FVB mice eggs, which were implanted into pseudo-pregnant FVB females. All mice were housed at the transgenic mouse facility of Cyagen Biosciences Inc. (Guangzhou, China).

DNA purified from the tails of F0 offspring mice was used to screen for transgene integration by the PCR amplification of EGFP and neo (Table 2). Transgenic F0 mice were crossed with wild-type mice to obtain an F1 generation that was also screened using PCR amplification as above. Three of the 33 F1 mice were selected for Southern blot analysis to confirm PCR data using the DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter kit II (Roche, USA). The probe was complemented with the neo fragment by digesting the pSilencer4.1-CD14shRNA-IRES plasmid with Nco I and Eag I. The positive control was pSilencer™4.1-CD14 shRNA-674-IRES plasmid.

Transgene expression analysis

The expression of eGFP in tissues of F1 transgenic mice was assayed by confocal microscopy (LSM 510, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Briefly, 10-μm-thick cryostat sections from snap frozen tissues were prepared and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Specimens were visualized using an Olympus BX61 microscope, and digital pictures were acquired with a CCD camera.

The relative expression of CD14, MD-2, TLR4, IL-6, TNF-α, and neo mRNA in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney of F1 transgenic mice was assessed by SYBR® Green qRT-PCR; tissues of wild-type mice were used as a negative control. ACTB and histone H2a were used as internal control genes (Table 2), and non-transcribed RNA samples served as an RT-minus control. The expression level of each target gene was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT formula as above.

Statistical analysis

qRT-PCR mRNA expression data were analyzed using SPSS16.0 and Excel 2003 to statistically process multiple samples. Single-factor analysis of variance and the q-test were used for pairwise comparisons. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Abbreviations

CD14: 

Cluster of differentiation antigen 14

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccaride

TLR: 

Toll-like receptor

IL-6: 

Interleukin-6

TNF-α: 

Tumor necrosis factor-α

NF-KB: 

Nuclear factor kappaB

shRNA: 

Short hair RNA

MOI: 

Multiplicity of infection

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Transgenic Project (2009ZX08007-009B), Guangxi Natural Science funding (2012GXNSFCB053002), funding from the State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Bioresource Conservation and Utilization (KSL-CUSAb-2012-02) and State Education Ministry’s Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Bioresource Conservation and Utilization at Guangxi University
(2)
College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University
(3)
Guangxi High Education Key Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, Guangxi University

References

  1. Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Ulevitch RJ. CD14: cell surface receptor and differentiation marker. Immunol Today. 1993;14:121–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Le Roy D, Di Padova F, Adachi Y, Glauser MP, Calandra T, Heumann D. Critical role of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and CD14 in immune responses against gram-negative bacteria. J Immunol. 2001;167:2759–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Song G, Li X, Shen Y, Qian L, Kong X, Chen M, et al. Transplantation of iPSc Restores Cardiac Function by Promoting Angiogenesis and Ameliorating Cardiac Remodeling in a Post-infarcted Swine Model. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  4. Li XQ, Pryds A, Carlsen J, Larsen M. Multifocal central serous chorioretinopathy with photoreceptor-retinal pigment epithelium diastasis in heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension. Retinal Cases Brief Rep. 2015;9:83–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Thorgersen EB, Hellerud BC, Nielsen EW, Barratt-Due A, Fure H, Lindstad JK, et al. CD14 inhibition efficiently attenuates early inflammatory and hemostatic responses in Escherichia coli sepsis in pigs. FASEB J. 2010;24:712–22.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li X, Cai J, Zhuang Z, Liu J, Xia B, Hu G, et al. Investigation of the action mechanisms of poly-ADP-ribosylation in hexavalent chromium induced cell damage. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;48:720–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zuo H, Liao D, Lin L, Zhang R, Li X. Resveratrol attenuates hypoxia-reperfusion injury induced rat myocardium microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction through upregulating PI3K/Akt/SVV pathways]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014;42:670–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miyake K. Innate immune sensing of pathogens and danger signals by cell surface Toll-like receptors. Semin Immunol. 2007;19:3–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyake K. Innate recognition of lipopolysaccharide by CD14 and toll-like receptor 4-MD-2: unique roles for MD-2. Int Immunopharmacol. 2003;3:119–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Miyake K. Innate recognition of lipopolysaccharide by Toll-like receptor 4-MD-2. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:186–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:805–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen S, Lee LF, Fisher TS, Jessen B, Elliott MW, Evering W, et al. Combination of 4-1BB agonist and PD-1 antagonist promotes anti-tumor effector/memory CD8 T cells in a poorly immunogenic tumor model. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:149–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Xu Z, Huang CX, Li Y, Wang PZ, Ren GL, Chen CS, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 siRNA attenuates LPS-induced secretion of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by macrophages. J Infect. 2007;55:e1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mancek-Keber M, Gradisar H, Pestana MI, de Tejada GM, Jerala R. Free Thiol Group of MD-2 as the Target for Inhibition of the Lipopolysaccharide-induced Cell Activation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:19493–500.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Qian L, Zhao H, Li X, Yin J, Tang W, Chen P, et al. Pirenzepine Inhibits Myopia in Guinea Pig Model by Regulating the Balance of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 Expression and Increased Tyrosine Hydroxylase Levels. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  16. Haziot A, Ferrero E, Kontgen F, Hijiya N, Yamamoto S, Silver J, et al. Resistance to endotoxin shock and reduced dissemination of gram-negative bacteria in CD14-deficient mice. Immunity. 1996;4:407–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Roncon-Albuquerque R, Moreira-Rodrigues M, Faria B, Ferreira AP, Cerqueira C, Lourenco AP, et al. Attenuation of the cardiovascular and metabolic complications of obesity in CD14 knockout mice. Life Sci. 2008;83:502–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haziot A, Rong GW, Lin XY, Silver J, Goyert SM. Recombinant soluble CD14 prevents mortality in mice treated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide). J Immunol. 1995;154:6529–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Li XX, Guan HJ, Liu JP, Guo YP, Yang Y, Niu YY, et al. Association of selenoprotein S gene polymorphism with ischemic stroke in a Chinese case–control study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015;26:131–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagaoka I, Hirota S, Niyonsaba F, Hirata M, Adachi Y, Tamura H, et al. Cathelicidin family of antibacterial peptides CAP18 and CAP11 inhibit the expression of TNF-alpha by blocking the binding of LPS to CD14 (+) cells. J Immunol. 2001;167:3329–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li X, Lu C, Dai J, Dong S, Chen Y, Hu N, et al. Novel multiferroicity in GdMnO3 thin films with self-assembled nano-twinned domains. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7019. doi:10.1038/srep07019.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hou Y, Wang Y, Zhao J, Li X, Cui J, Ding J, et al. Smart soup, a traditional chinese medicine formula, ameliorates amyloid pathology and related cognitive deficits. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111215.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mookherjee N, Wilson HL, Doria S, Popowych Y, Falsafi R, Yu JJ, et al. Bovine and human cathelicidin cationic host defense peptides similarly suppress transcriptional responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Leukocyte Biol. 2006;80:1563–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nemchinov LG, Paape MJ, Sohn EJ, Bannerman DD, Zarlenga DS, Hammond RW. Bovine CD14 receptor produced in plants reduces severity of intramammary bacterial infection. Faseb J. 2006;20:1345–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Song YX, Dou H, Gong W, Liu XQ, Yu ZG, Li EG, et al. Bis-N-norgliovictin, a small-molecule compound from marine fungus, inhibits LPS-induced inflammation in macrophages and improves survival in sepsis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;705:49–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shao Y, Cheng Z, Li X, Chernaya V, Wang H, Yang XF. Immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory cytokines directly and indirectly inhibit endothelial dysfunction- a novel mechanism for maintaining vascular function. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:80.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li X, Kolomeisky AB. Theoretical analysis of microtubule dynamics at all times. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:13777–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li X, Li M, Huang S, Qiao S, Qin Z, Kang C, et al. The effect of buffalo CD14 shRNA on the gene expression of TLR4 signal pathway in buffalo monocyte/macrophages. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2014;19:623–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Verbon A, Dekkers PE, ten Hove T, Hack CE, Pribble JP, Turner T, et al. IC14, an anti-CD14 antibody, inhibits endotoxin-mediated symptoms and inflammatory responses in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166:3599–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Li X, Hou L, Liu M, Lin X, Li Y, Li S: Primary effects of extracellular enzyme activity and microbial community on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in estuarine and tidal wetlands. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2014. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement