Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Immunohistochemical localization and mRNA quantification of osteopontin and Tamm-Horsfall protein in canine renal tissue after potassium oxalate injection

BMC Veterinary Research201410:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-70

©  Mohamaden et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

Received: 5 December 2013

Accepted: 11 March 2014

Published: 17 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Urinary macromolecules contribute to promoting or inhibiting crystal retention in renal tissue and stone formation. Osteopontin (OPN) and Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP) are the most important proteins involved in this process. Although these two proteins were discovered a long time ago, their role in setting kidney stone formation has not yet been fully investigated. We conducted a study to explore the role of OPN and THP in canine renal oxalosis. Ten dogs were carefully examined prior to the study. Six dogs were assigned to the treatment group and were injected intravenously with 0.5 M potassium oxalate (KOx). The other four dogs were assigned to a control group and were injected intravenously with 0.9% NaCl three times a day (tid) for 7 consecutive days. Then kidneys were harvested for pathological, immunohistochemical examination and OPN and THP mRNA expression levels were quantified by quantitative real-time PCR.

Results

Calcium oxalate crystals deposition was observed in both renal cortex and medulla. Immunohistochemistry examination revealed increased tissue expression of OPN in the renal tissue while THP was significantly decreased. OPN mRNA expression level significantly increased in treated dogs compared to that in the controls, while THP mRNA level significantly decreased.

Conclusion

Together, these results suggest that THP and OPN are both involved in the pathogenesis and response to oxalate exposure.

Keywords

CanineOsteopontinTamm-HorsfallmRNAIHC

Background

In the past two decades, calcium oxalate urolithiasis (COU) has been a frustrating problem in dogs and cats worldwide [1]. Usually the presence of oxalate crystals in urine is a result from urinary supersaturation of oxalate salts. A problem that might be established in kidneys first and subsequently leads to retention of oxalate crystals within the renal tissue, inducing injury to renal tubules [2] due to adhesion between crystals and renal epithelial tissue [3]. Kidneys normally produce macromolecules such as osteopontin (OPN), nephrocalcin, fibronectin, Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP) and other macromolecules that bind to calcium salts in order to prevent or promote crystal growth and aggregation [4].

OPN is a negatively-charged aspartic acid-rich protein expressed in tissues, such as bone, liver, kidney, lung, bladder, and pancreas, as well as in macrophages [5]. It inhibits the formation of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals and regulates physiologic and pathologic mineralization [6]. The role of OPN in nephrolithiasis formation is unclear. In vitro, studies suggested that OPN inhibits nucleation, and CaOx crystal growth and aggregation in cultured epithelial cells. It also enhances the formation of calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) crystals that are less adherent to renal tissue than calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) crystals [7]. Conversely, other studies found OPN associated with nephrolithiasis through the mineralization and dystrophic calcification of the urolithiasis matrix [8]. OPN is also an important mediator of tissue injury. Increased expression of OPN in renal tubule cells is related to an accumulation of macrophages in the damaged tissue, since OPN is involved in the recruitment and retention of macrophages in the inflamed site [9–11].

Another urinary macromolecule involved in renal tissue crystals deposition is uromodulin or THP, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol protein, the most abundant urinary protein and the main constituent of hyaline urinary casts [12]. THP forms a gel like matrix that traps bacteria and prevents their adhesion to plasma membranes. It also acts as an inhibitor of stone formation in healthy individuals by trapping crystals in the same manner [13]. However, this function may be subverted under some circumstances and THP may facilitate crystal aggregation and then promote stone formation [14]. In humans, studies investigating the association between THP expression and urinary excretion were inconsistent in stone forming patients [15]. THP was expressed in the thick ascending limbs of Henle’s loops in normal renal tissue of dogs [16], and it was chosen as a new biomarker of canine renal toxicity [17], indicating that THP is involved in the development of renal diseases in dogs.

Despite numerous proteins that engaged in the retention of CaOx crystals in the urinary tract, understanding the precise mechanisms by which OPN and THP influence the several aspects of crystallization and urinary stone formation is only beginning to emerge. For instance, THP expression decreased in ethylene glycol-administered rats [18], while in other studies it increased [19] or remained unchanged in others [20]. Some studies dealt only with one of the two proteins, this does not provide a logical understanding of how these two proteins interact. Most of the studies that focused on both proteins were conducted in either laboratory animals [18, 21] or in Madin Darby canine kidney cell culture (MDCK) [22], which may not be representative of the real situation in canine renal tissue in vivo. However the conflicting roles of THP and OPN makes the study of their reaction toward kidney stone formation also valuable for the explanation of the pathogenesis of renal oxalosis in dogs. We hypothesized that THP and OPN expression in the renal tissue will be changed after exposure to oxalates. The aim of current study is to record the canine renal tissue injury upon oxalates injection in vivo and to quantify THP and OPN gene expressions of renal tubular cells in order to investigate their role of pathogenesis in canine renal oxalosis.

Methods

Chemicals

0.5 mol/l KOx (K2C2O4 · H2O) (MW = 184 g) was prepared KOx solution was filtered (0.22 μm) prior to injection and transfused to dogs in the treatment group at a dose of 0.13 ml/kg. The control group received the same volume of physiological saline.

Design

Ten experimentally-naive healthy intact adult beagles over the age range of 2.5-3 years and body weight ranged between 8-12 kg were provided from the research unit of the Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University. Dogs were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 6, four males and two females) and control group (n = 4, one male and three females). Dogs were housed separately in stainless steel cages. All dogs were fed commercial diet twice a day and water was provided ad libitum for acclimatization. All dogs received clinical examinations including creatinine, urea nitrogen and urine specific gravity tests before conducting the experiment. None of the dogs had any previous history of long-term illness. Butterfly catheters were fixed in the cephalic veins. Each group was injected with the corresponding solution three times a day for seven days. Eight hours after the last injection, kidney samples were collected by surgical incision in the midabdomen under thiobarbiturate anesthesia (20 mg/kg). Dogs were then euthanized by injecting the lethal dose of the anesthetic agent. All experiments and procedures performed on the animals were approved by the Animal Care and Ethical Committee of Yangzhou University.

Histologic and immunohistochemical examination

Kidney tissue was fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (pH = 7.4), and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer thick sections were stained by H&E and Pizzolato’s method [23] to detect the presence of calcium oxalates. Deparaffinized tissue sections were incubated in 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 10 min, followed by washing with distilled water, then followed by citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) antigen retrieval. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin for 30 min, and the slides were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-OPN or polyclonal rabbit anti-THP antibodies (Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology Company, China) at 4°C overnight. Slides were incubated 30 min at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase conjugated species-specific secondary antibody. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as chromogen to detect OPN and THP signals. Then slides were counterstained with hematoxyline, dehydrated and mounted under coverslip. Negative control sections were incubated with phosphate buffer saline. Images were analyzed by an inverted light microscope equipped with a Quick Imaging System (Leica DM2500, Leica, Germany).

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR

After kidney collection, the kidney was divided into cortex and medulla, each part was cut into small parts of kidney tissues and directly dipped in RNA fixer (Takara, Cat9750) and stored at -20°C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Trizol, RNAiso Plus, Takara, Dalian). RNA was eluted in nuclease-free water and subjected to DNase to remove genomic DNA (Recombinant DNASE I, Takara, Dalian). After DNase treatment, RNA was quantified with Nano Drop. The absorption ratio (OD260nm/OD280nm) was between 1.8 and 2.2, indicating a high quality RNA. Samples were immediately reverse-transcribed using 3 μg of extracted RNA per sample (Primescript 1st strand, Takara, Dalian). The resulting cDNA was stored at -20°C until analyzed. qPCR gene-specific primers for canine osteopontin (OPN, Accession Number: DQ195101.1) and canine Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP, Accession Number: AF498324.1) were designed and synthesized (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Ribosomal protein L13A (RPL13A, Accession Number: AJ388525) was used as a housekeeping gene, because it is the most stably expressed housekeeping gene in canine tissue [24] (Table 1).
Table 1

Primers for quantitative real-time PCR

Gene

Forward primer

Reverse primer

Product size

OPN

5-TAGCCAGGACTCCGTTGACT-3

5-ACACTATCACCTCGGCCATC-3

162

THP

5-TGCCTGGTGGGTTTCACT-3

5-CGAGTAATTGCCCTTGTTGTT-3

249

RPL13A

5-GCCGGAAGGTTGTAGTCGT-3

5-GGAGGAAGGCCAGGTAATTC-3

87

The cDNA was subjected to qPCR amplification using the SybrGreen (Sybrpremix EX Taq II, Takara, Dalian) in qPCR System (Applied Biosystems7500 Real-Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems, USA). qPCR was conducted in 20 μL of reaction agent composed of a water-base dilution of 10 μL SYBR Premix EX II, 2 μL cDNA templates, and 0.2 μL of each primer. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Thermal cycling conditions were identical for the 2 primers: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis identified a single PCR product after amplification of OPN, THP, and RPL13A. The fold change (n-fold) for gene expression was calculated using the relative quantification method (2-ΔΔCt).

Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test using SPSS for Windows (Version 16.0, Chicago, SPSS Inc. Released in 2007) was used to compare the ΔCt values of treatment and control groups for both target genes separately. The level of significance at which the null hypothesis was rejected is α = 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed on the ΔCt values and processed into ΔΔCt and converted to n-fold (2–ΔΔCt) for data presentation.

Results

Histologic findings

Seven consecutive days of intravenous KOx injection resulted in intratubular retention of CaOx crystals. CaOx crystals were evident in both Pizzolato’s and H&E stained tissue sections. Crystals were present in both the renal medulla and cortex, and affected proximal nephrons, distal nephrons, collecting ducts, and some tubules appeared dilated, while there were no crystals observed in the renal tissue of control group as well as the renal tubules appeared normal and cells were intact (Figure 1). CaOx crystal induced injury to renal epithelium, loss of the brush border and apical membrane with leakage of the cellular content into the tubular lumen. Large amounts of leukocytes infiltration and fibrin deposition were observed in the renal tissue near crystals and in the interstitium in the cortex and medulla (Figure 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Cross section in the renal tissue of both groups. A) Control group. B) Treatment group, note the retention of CaOx crystals (black deposits) and tubular dilatation × 100. Pizzolatos and HE stain.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Illustration to areas of inflammation in the renal tissue of treatment group. A) CaOx crystals deposition (black arrows), tubular injury and inflammatory cells infiltration in the renal tissue, Pizzolatos and HE stains. B) Encircled area shows leukocytic infiltration, fibrin deposition and CaOx crystals retention (black arrow). HE stains. C) Square encloses the area of leukocytic infiltration and OPN expression. Antigens were detected using antibodies to osteopontin, followed by second antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase with DAB counterstained with hematoxelyne × 400.

Localization of OPN and THP in kidney tissue

Immunohistochemical staining of renal tissue sections revealed different levels of OPN and THP protein expression in the treatment and control dogs. A remarkable increase in the intensity and spread of OPN staining was observed in the tubular lumina as well as in the cells of distal tubules, the medullary thick ascending limbs of the loop of Henle, collecting ducts, in a few number of thin descending limbs of Henle and at the site of inflammation of either cortex or medulla in the kidney of treated dog (Figure 2C & Figure 3). Staining was not detected in the proximal convoluted tubules, glomeruli, or Bowman’s capsules. Staining for OPN was commonly in the cell membrane, cytoplasm of renal epithelial cells, within the tubular lumina and occasionally around crystals. Nuclei were not stained. In the control dogs, epithelial cell staining for OPN was limited to the distal tubules, thick ascending limb of Henle (TALH) and a few collecting ducts.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Changes in protein level of osteopontin in paraffin embedded kidney sections of the treatment group and the controls. A &B expression of OPN in the outer medulla in the TALH and few of collecting ducts in control and treatment groups respectively × 100. C &E show normal expression of OPN in control group. D &F show the increased intensity of staining in cellular content and luminal expression of OPN in treatment group. DAB counterstained with hematoxelyne × 400.

Staining for THP in the treatment group decreased compared to the control group in the TALH of the inner cortex and outer medulla. THP was localized at basolateral border. In the control group, staining for THP was restricted to the epithelia of the TALH and some distal convoluted tubules along the apical borders and throughout the cytoplasm. Nuclei were not stained. No other region of the nephron was stained for THP in either the treatment or control group (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Changes in protein level of Tamm-horsfall protein in paraffin embedded kidney sections of the treatment group and the controls. Antigens were detected using antibodies to THP, followed by second antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase with DAB counterstained with hematoxelyne. A) Expression of THP in control group in TALH. B) Decreased expression of THP in treatment group × 400.

RNA expression of OPN and THP in kidneys

Injection with 0.5 M KOx in treatment group elicited a significant up-regulation of mRNA expression (9.64 folds increase) in cortex and (12.72 folds increase) medulla for OPN (p < 0.01) compared to that in the control group (Figure 5A,C). Whereas there was a significant down-regulation of mRNA expression (13.9 fold decrease) and (10.37 fold decrease) in cortex and medulla for THP respectively (p < 0.01) compared to that in the control group (Figure 5B,D).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Fold of change (n-fold) in OPN (A, C) and THP (B, D) mRNA gene expression in cortex and medulla respectively of dogs in each group after 7 days of experiment ( p < 0.01).

Discussion

Recent studies indicated that oxalate and CaOx crystals influence the expression of several genes in renal tubular cells which subsequently modify the attachment, growth and aggregation of CaOx crystals [25]. In this study we investigated how oxalate salts and oxalate crystals affected the expression of two proteins produced by the distal regions of the nephron; OPN and THP. These two macromolecules were chosen because their patterns of expression within the nephron are similar but their regulation is different.

OPN is confined to the distal parts of a subset of nephrons. In the kidney the expression of OPN is severely upregulated during renal injury [26]. That might explain why there was an intense staining for OPN indicating a significant increase in OPN protein production in the renal epithelium, tubular lumina and at the sites of inflammation in the treatment group. These results parallel those found in nephrolithiatic rats [21]. The presence of high intensity of OPN staining in the lumen might be attributed to the secretory nature of OPN that, in spite of its high mRNA levels, is being transferred to the extracellular fluid or into secretory products such as urine [27]; moreover crystal retention strongly induces tubular injury and luminal expression of OPN [3].

Data from qPCR demonstrated a significant up-regulation of OPN mRNA in the treatment group. This marked increase in OPN expression can be explained in two ways. One is that crystal/membrane interaction stimulates further OPN mRNA and protein production [22] which enhances crystal adhesion to the renal epithelium and facilitates crystal aggregation which leads to blockage of the tubular lumen. This supports the notion that OPN acts as a stone promoter. But, Grohe et al. [28] considered OPN a promising agent for endogenous stone inhibition by converting CaOx crystallization to the COD phase which is significantly less adhering to renal epithelial cells than the COM phase. This is because COM is more commonly present in kidney stones [29] and COD is more frequently excreted in urine [30]. It is suggested that the structural features of COM crystals may increase their likelihood of being retained within the kidney where they may act as nuclei for stone formation, while those of COD reduce the probability of their attachment to renal cells. Thus, it has been proposed that preferential formation of COD, rather than COM crystals would protect against stone pathogenesis [31]. OPN is one of the urinary proteins bound to the surfaces of COM crystals [32, 33] and is also incarcerated within them [34], to inhibit the attachment of COM urinary crystals to renal epithelial cell membranes. Therefore it is possible that the more frequent excretion of the dihydrate might result from differences between individual proteins associated with COM and COD crystals. The last theory was reinforced by studies on OPN knock-out and wild-type mice treated with ethylene glycol (EG). After 4 weeks of treatment with 1% EG, no crystals were retained in wild-type mice, whereas x-ray diffraction analysis of entire tissue sections from OPN knockout mice confirmed that the retained crystals were exclusively COM [35].

Inflammatory cells infiltration is a common feature of tissue injury. The renal damage caused by COM crystal deposition in the kidney may provoke an inflammatory response [36] in which the injured renal tubule cells and macrophages produce various cytokines including OPN [5], which was highly expressed in the renal tissue of the treatment group to attract and retain in the inflammatory cells at the site of inflammation as it coats COM crystals and mediates their attachment to macrophages and interstitial multinucleated cell to facilitate the removal of crystals and tissue repair [37]. But the multifunctional protein, OPN, tasks never end as at the same time it assists in the engulfment of crystals into macrophages and also protects the neighboring healthy tissue from the cytotoxic effect substances such as nitric oxide produced by macrophages [38].

THP, the most abundant protein in urine of humans and animals under physiological conditions, significantly decreased in the urine of stone formers [39]. Although THP is predominantly an apically secreted protein, its abnormal localization during nephropathy has been well-described [40]. In the current study, the immunohistochemistry showed a diminished expression of THP in the treatment group and translocation from the apical membrane and cytoplasm to the basolateral border. qPCR assay revealed a significant decrease in THP mRNA expression level in the treatment group compared to that in the control group, which might be attributed to the toxic effect of oxalates that suppressed THP expression in the renal tissue cells thus promoting COM deposition [18]. Several studies suggested that stone formation could be promoted by quantitative deficiencies in protein synthesis or by molecular abnormalities. These abnormalities may result from defects in primary sequence and/or posttranslational modifications could result in altered conformation and/or patterns of charge density crucial for crystal binding. Dysfunctional molecules could bind less well to crystals or could promote stone formation by other mechanisms such as acceleration of growth kinetics [41] or serving as nucleation sites [42].

Interpretation of OPN results could not be discussed separately from those obtained for THP. We can postulate that after 7 days of oxalate injection renal THP synthesis significantly decreased to encourage crystal growth and/or aggregation around cellular injury. Concurrently, the kidneys promoted OPN up-regulation to minimize crystal deposition and retention. This interpretation was supported by the significantly increased OPN in THP knock-out mice [43]. However, it seemed that any defensive mechanism of OPN was overcome by the COM crystal formation resulting from oxalates exposure.

Conclusion

For the first time the expression of osteopontin and Tamm-Horsfall protein in canine renal oxalosis were measured. We concluded that the two specific urinary macromolecules OPN and THP secreted by the kidneys responded differently to oxalate injection and participated in an opposite manner in the pathogenesis of semi-acute canine renal oxalosis. In this study we were limited by the scanty literature dealing with these two proteins in canine tissue in vivo especially canine OPN, therefore we highlight the need for further studies in the veterinary field about the potential roles of the urinary macromolecules in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Howard Gelberg, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, for his valuable comments and excellent work in revising and copyediting the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31072176, 31302151), Jiangsu Youth Foundation (No.BK2012265) and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
(2)
Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, China

References

  1. Lulich JP, Osborne CA, Albasan H, Koehler LA, Ulrich LM, Lekcharoensuk C: Recent shifts in the global proportions of canine uroliths. Vet Rec. 2013, 172: 363-366. 10.1136/vr.101056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Finlayson B, Reid F: The expectation of free and fixed particles in urinary stone disease. Invest Urol. 1978, 15: 442-448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Asselman M, Verkoelen CF: Crystal-cell interaction in the pathogenesis of kidney stone disease. Curr Opin Urol. 2002, 12: 271-276. 10.1097/00042307-200207000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbas C, Garcia A, Saavedra L, Muros M: Urinary analysis of nephrolithiasis markers. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002, 781: 433-455. 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00557-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ophascharoensuk V, Giachelli CM, Gordon K, Hughes J, Pichler R, Brown P, Liaw L, Schmidt R, Shankland SJ, Alpers CE, Couser WG, Johnson RJ: Obstructive uropathy in the mouse: role of osteopontin in interstitial fibrosis and apoptosis. Kidney Int. 1999, 56: 571-580. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00580.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Basavaraj D, Biyani C, Browning A, Cartledg J: The role of urinary kidney stone inhibitors and promoters in the pathogenesis of calcium containing renal stones. Eau-Ebu update series. 2007, 5: 126-136. 10.1016/j.eeus.2007.03.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Thurgood LA, Cook AF, Sørensen ES, Ryall RL: Face-specific incorporation of osteopontin into urinary and inorganic calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate crystals. Urol Res. 2010, 38: 357-376. 10.1007/s00240-010-0300-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohri K, Nomura S, Kitamura Y, Nagata T, Yoshioka K, Iguchi M, Yamate T, Umekawa T, Suzuki Y, Sinohara H, Kurita T: Structure and expression of the mRNA encoding urinary stone protein (osteopontin). J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 15180-15184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleinman JG, Beshensky A, Worcester EM, Brown D: Expression of osteopontin, a urinary inhibitor of stone mineral crystal growth, in rat kidney. Kidney Int. 1995, 47: 1585-1596. 10.1038/ki.1995.222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartner A, Porst M, Gauer S, Prols F, Veelken R, Hilgers KF: Glomerular osteopontin expression and macrophage infiltration in glomerulosclerosis of DOCA-salt rats. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001, 38: 153-164. 10.1053/ajkd.2001.25209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mazzali M, Kpari T, Ophascharoensuk V, Wesson JA, Jhonson R, Hughes J: Osteopontin a molecule for all seasons. Q J Med. 2002, 95: 3-13. 10.1093/qjmed/95.1.3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Devuyst O, Dahan K, Pirson Y: Tamm-Horsfall protein or uromodulin: new ideas about an old molecule. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005, 20: 1290-1294. 10.1093/ndt/gfh851.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vyletal P, Bleyer AJ, Kmoch S: Uromodulin biology and pathophysiology – an update. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2010, 33: 456-475. 10.1159/000321013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hess B, Zipperle L, Jaeger P: Citrate and calcium effects on Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein as a modifier of calcium oxalate crystal aggregation. Am J Physiol. 1993, 265: F784-F791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Walton RC, Kavanagh JP, Heywood BR, Rao PN: The association of different urinary proteins with calcium oxalate hydromorphs. Evidence for non-specific interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1723: 175-183. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.02.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brandt LE, Bohn AA, Charles JB, Ehrhart EJ: Localization of canine, feline, and mouse renal membrane proteins. Vet Pathol. 2012, 49: 693-703. 10.1177/0300985811410720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bauchet AL, Masson R, Guffroy M, Slaoui M: Immunohistochemical identification of kidney nephron segments in the dog, rat, mouse, and cynomolgus monkey. Toxicol Pathol. 2011, 39: 1115-1128. 10.1177/0192623311425060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Marengo SR, Chen DH, Kaung HL, Resnick MI, Yang L: Decreased renal expression of the putative calcium oxalate inhibitor Tamm-Horsfall protein in the ethylene glycol rat model of calcium oxalate urolithiasis. J Urol. 2002, 167: 2192-2197. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65127-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gokhale JA, McKee MD, Khan SR: Immunocytochemical localization of Tamm-Horsfall protein in the kidneys of normal and nephrolithic rats. Urol Res. 1996, 24: 201-209. 10.1007/BF00295893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gokhale JA, Glenton PA, Khan SR: Characterization of Tamm-Horsfall protein in a rat nephrolithiasis model. J Urol. 2001, 166: 1492-1497. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65818-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan SR, Johnson JM, Peck AB, Cornelius JG, Glenton PA: Expression of osteopontin in rat kidneys: induction during ethylene glycol induced calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2002, 168: 1173-1181. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64621-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lieske JC, Hammes MS, Hoyer JR: Renal cell osteopontin production is stimulated by calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals. Kidney Int. 1997, 51: 679-686. 10.1038/ki.1997.98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pizzolato P: Histochemical recognition of calcium oxalate. J Histochem Cytochem. 1964, 12: 333-336. 10.1177/12.5.333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Peters IR, Peters D, Helps CR, Day MJ: Development and application of multiple internal reference (housekeeper) gene assays for accurate normalization of canine gene expression studies. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007, 117: 55-66. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyazawa K, Aihara K, Ikeda R, Moriyama MT, Suzuki K: cDNA macroarray analysis of genes in renal epithelial cells exposed to calcium oxalate crystals. Urol Res. 2009, 37: 27-33. 10.1007/s00240-008-0164-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Denhardt DT, Noda M, O’Regan AW, Pavlin D, Berman JS: Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J Clin Invest. 2001, 107: 1055-1061. 10.1172/JCI12980.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rittling SR, Feng F: Detection of mouse osteopontin by western blotting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 250: 287-292. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Grohe B, Chan BP, Sorensen ES, Lajoie G, Goldberg HA, Hunter GK: Cooperation of phosphates and carboxylates controls calcium oxalate crystallization in ultrafiltered urine. Urol Res. 2011, 39: 327-338. 10.1007/s00240-010-0360-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandel NS, Mandel GS: Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J Urol. 1989, 142: 1516-1521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Elliot JS, Rabinowitz IN: Calcium oxalate crystalluria: crystal size in urine. J Urol. 1980, 123: 324-327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wesson JA, Worcester EM, Wiessner JH, Mandel NS, Kleinman JG: Control of calcium oxalate crystal structure and cell adherence by urinary macromolecules. Kidney Int. 1998, 53: 952-957. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.1998.00839.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar V, Farell G, Lieske JC: Whole urinary proteins coat calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals to greatly decrease their adhesion to renal cells. J Urol. 2003, 170: 221-225. 10.1097/01.ju.0000059540.36463.9f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grover PK, Thurgood LA, Ryall RL: Effect of urine fractionation on attachment of calcium oxalate crystals to renal epithelial cells: implications for studying renal calculogenesis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007, 292: F1396-F1403. 10.1152/ajprenal.00456.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grover PK, Thurgood LA, Wang T, Ryall RL: The effects of intracrystalline and surface-bound proteins on the attachment of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals to renal cells in undiluted human urine. BJU Int. 2010, 105: 708-715. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08816.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wesson JA, Johnson RJ, Mazzali M, Beshensky AM, Stietz S, Giachelli C, Liaw L, Alpers CE, Couser WG, Kleinman JG, Hughes J: Osteopontin is a critical inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystal formation and retention in renal tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003, 14: 139-147. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000040593.93815.9D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, McLaren MC, McMartin KE: Involvement of urinary proteins in the rat strain difference in sensitivity to ethylene glycol-induced renal toxicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010, 299: F605-F615. 10.1152/ajprenal.00419.2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. De Water R, Leenen PJ, Noordermeer C, Nigg AL, Houtsmuller AB, Kok DJ, Schroder FH: Cytokine production induced by binding and processing of calcium oxalate crystals in cultured macrophages. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001, 38: 331-338. 10.1053/ajkd.2001.26098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hwang SM, Lopez CA, Heck DE, Gardner CR, Laskin DL, Laskin JD, Denhardt DT: Osteopontin inhibits induction of nitric oxide synthase gene expression by inflammatory mediators in mouse kidney epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 711-715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ganter K, Bongartz D, Hesse A: Tamm-Horsfall protein excretion and its relation to citrate in urine of stone-forming patients. Urology. 1999, 53: 492-495. 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00581-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Resnick JS, Sisson S, Vernier RL: Tamm-Horsfall protein. Abnormal localization in renal disease. Lab Invest. 1978, 38: 550-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Worcester EM, Nakagawa Y, Wabner CL, Kumar S, Coe FL: Crystal adsorption and growth slowing by nephrocalcin, albumin, and Tamm-Horsfall protein. Am J Physiol. 1988, 255: F1197-F1205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. De Yoreo JJ, Qiu SR, Hoyer JR: Molecular modulation of calcium oxalate crystallization. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006, 291: F1123-F1131. 10.1152/ajprenal.00136.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mo L, Huang HY, Zhu XH, Shapiro E, Hasty DL, Wu XR: Tamm-Horsfall protein is a critical renal defense factor protecting against calcium oxalate crystal formation. Kidney Int. 2004, 66: 1159-1166. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00867.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mohamaden et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us