- Research article
- Open Access
Biologic activity of the novel orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 against canine melanoma cell lines
© Breit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 April 2014
Accepted: 1 July 2014
Published: 15 July 2014
Exportin 1 (XPO1, also known as CRM1), is a chaperone protein responsible for the export of over 200 target proteins out of the nucleus. The expression and activity of XPO1 is upregulated in several human cancers and its expression is also linked to the development of chemotherapy resistance. Recent studies using both human and murine cancer cell lines have demonstrated that XPO1 is a relevant target for therapeutic intervention. The present study sought to characterize the biologic activity of an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), KPT-335, against canine melanoma cell lines as a prelude to future clinical trials in dogs with melanoma.
We evaluated the effects of KPT-335 on 4 canine malignant melanoma cell lines and found that KPT-335 inhibited proliferation, blocked colony formation, and induced apoptosis of treated cells at biologically relevant concentrations of drug. Additionally, KPT-335 downregulated XPO1 protein while inducing a concomitant increase in XPO1 messenger RNA. Lastly, KPT-335 treatment of cell lines upregulated the expression of both protein and mRNA for the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and p21, and promoted their nuclear localization.
KPT-335 demonstrates biologic activity against canine melanoma cell lines at physiologically relevant doses, suggesting that KPT-335 may represent a viable treatment option for dogs with malignant melanoma.
Canine oral malignant melanoma is a biologically aggressive tumor with a reported metastatic rate of up to 90% . Local disease can be treated with surgery and coarse-fractionated radiation therapy, with success dependent on location and stage . Despite options for local control most dogs will eventually die of metastatic disease . Similar to the case with human malignant melanoma, the use of traditional chemotherapy agents, such carboplatin and cisplatin, has little impact on both the primary tumor and metastatic disease, with no substantial survival benefit [3–7]. Other treatment strategies, such as immunotherapy using a variety of vaccine based approaches, including the commercially available xenogeneic melanoma vaccine (Oncept), have been explored as options for the management of canine malignant melanoma [8–10]. While the Oncept vaccine was proven to be safe and preliminary data indicated that it significantly enhanced survival when used in the setting of loco-regional control,  a recent retrospective clinical study failed to replicate these findings dogs with oral melanoma that had loco-regional tumor control [10–14]. There is also limited data in which small molecule inhibitors such as toceranib phosphate (Palladia) have been used to treat this disease in dogs, although formal data regarding efficacy is lacking [15, 16]. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches to treatment are needed.
Recently, the protein exportin 1 (XPO1, also called Chromosome Region Maintenance protein 1 [CRM1]) has been validated as a target for therapeutic intervention in cancer. XPO1 is one of seven known nuclear export proteins responsible for shuttling cargo from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [17–19]. It is a member of the karyopherin β family of transport receptors that binds over 200 target proteins through a hydrophobic leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) present in the cargo . XPO1 is the sole nuclear exporter of several major tumor suppressor and growth regulatory proteins (TSPs and GRPs), including p53, p75, Rb, p21, p27, STAT3, FOXO and IκB among others [21, 22]. There is now substantial data demonstrating that XPO1 is upregulated in both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [17–19]. Furthermore, overexpression of XPO1 correlates with a poor prognosis in many human cancers, indicating that changes in nuclear-cytoplasmic trafficking resulting in aberrant localization of key proteins can contribute to cancer development and progression.
Given the role of XPO1 dysregulation in cancer, there has been great interest in developing inhibitors of this protein. Recently, novel orally bioavailable, small-molecule selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds that specifically bind to XPO1 at the reactive site Cys 528 residue have been developed and tested both in vitro and in vivo[23–29]. SINE compounds induce apoptosis and block proliferation in several cancer cell lines, including those derived from colon , pancreas , and breast carcinomas  as well as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) , while sparing normal cells . Additional studies have shown potent anti-cancer activity and good tolerability of SINE in vivo using mouse human xenograft (subcutaneous, orthotopic, or leukemograft) models of pancreatic cancer , renal cancer , CLL , mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) , multiple myeloma  and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) . Early clinical trials of the SINE KPT-330 (selinexor) have demonstrated biologic activity of XPO1 inhibition in human lymphoid malignancies.
The SINE compound KPT-335 (verdinexor, closely related to selinexor) has been previously evaluated in canine lymphoma cell lines and found to have good activity in the low nanomolar range . Additionally, a phase I clinical trial of KPT-335 in dogs with primarily lymphoma demonstrated evidence of single agent activity consisting of both partial response to therapy and stable disease for over 4 weeks with excellent tolerability over long-term dosing. Lastly, data generated in both healthy dogs and dogs with cancer indicate that KPT-335 exhibits good oral bioavailability with an average Cmax of approximately 250 ng/ml and an average AUC of 1800 ng/ml . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of KPT-335 against established canine malignant melanoma cell lines as a prelude to future testing in dogs with metastatic melanoma.
Cell lines and reagents
Canine melanoma cell lines Mel 23, Mel 36, Mel 69 and Mel 83 were generously provided by Michael S. Kent (UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA) [34–36]. Three of the lines (Mel 23, 69 and 83) were derived from a primary oral tumor and Mel 36 was generated from a metastatic lymph node. The cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, non-essential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine, and Hepes (4-(2-hydroxythyl)-1-piperazineethanesolfonic acid) at 35°C, supplemented with 5% CO2. KPT-335 (provided by Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc, Natick, MA) was dissolved in DMSO to generate stock solutions for use in vitro. The following antibodies were used for Western blotting and immunofluorescence experiments: anti-p53, anti-p21, anti-XPO1, and anti- β-actin (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Cell proliferation assay
Melanoma cells (1.5 × 103) were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates overnight in 10% FBS supplemented media and incubated with DMSO or increasing concentrations of KPT-335. After 72 or 96 hours, the medium was removed and the plates were frozen at −80°C overnight before processing using the CyQuant® Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell proliferation was calculated as a percentage of the DMSO-treated control wells and IC50 values were derived after plotting proliferation values on a logarithmic curve. Each experiment was repeated 3 times.
Assessment of apoptosis
The ability of KPT-335 to induce apoptosis in treated cells was assessed using annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining as previously described . Briefly, 1.0 × 106 canine melanoma cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO, 0.1 μM KPT-335, or 1 μM KPT-335 for 96 hours at 37°C. Cells were collected, washed, and stained with annexin V–fluorescein isothiocyanate and PI for 15 minutes before evaluation by flow cytometry on a Becton Dickinson FACS Caliber. Each experiment was repeated 3 times.
Melanoma cells (2 × 106) in 10% FBS medium were treated with DMSO, 0.1 μM or 1 μM KPT-335 for 4 or 24 hours. Protein lysates were prepared and quantified, separated by SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting was performed using previously described methods . The membranes were incubated overnight with anti-XPO1, anti-p53 or anti-p21 antibodies, then incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase linked secondary antibodies, washed, and exposed to substrate (SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate, Pierce, Rockford, IL). Blots were stripped, washed, and reprobed for β-actin.
Total RNA was extracted from canine melanoma cells that were cultured in 10% FBS supplemented medium for 4 or 24 hours with DMSO, 0.1 μM or 1 μM KPT-335, using TRIzol (Invitrogen). cDNA was made from 2 μg of total RNA using Superscript III (Invitrogen), followed by real-time PCR with TaqMan-specific probes (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR for XPO1 was performed using the Applied Biosystems StepOne Plus Detection System and MIC-1 and p21 expression was detected using the ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies). Normalization was performed relative to 18S rRNA. All reactions were performed in triplicate and included no-template controls for each gene. Relative gene expression for all real-time PCR data was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method .
Cells were plated in a 24 well plate with poly-lysine coated coverslips (35,000-50,000 cells per well) then treated with DMSO or 1 μM KPT-335. They were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X. Next, the cells were blocked at room temperature in blocking buffer (1x PBS/5% bovine albumin/0.3% Triton-x) for 30 minutes and then were incubated with anti-p53 or anti-p21 for 1 hour at room temperature. A secondary FITC labeled anti-rabbit or anti-goat antibody was applied for 30 minutes, as appropriate (Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG Invitrogen or Alexa Fluor® 488 donkey anti-goat IgG Invitrogen). Cells were also stained with DAPI to visualize the nucleus (ProLong® Gold antifade reagent with DAPI Invitrogen). Intracellular localization of proteins was analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy using an Olympus FV1000 Spectral confocal microscope.
Melanoma cell lines were grown in flasks until 80% confluent, then collected, washed and plated at 2,000 cells per well in six-well plates. After 24 hours the cells were treated with DMSO, 1 nM, 10nM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM or 10 μM KPT 335 and incubated at 35°C, supplemented with 5% CO2 for 7 days. Cells were then fixed with methanol/acetic acid (3:1), washed with PBS and stained with crystal violet (0.5%). The surviving cell fraction was defined as the number of colonies counted divided by the number of cells that were plated in the treated groups and then normalized to the plating efficiency. Plating efficiency was defined as the number of colonies divided by the number of cells plated in the untreated group [34, 35]. Vehicle control treated Mel 23 and 36 cells served as the plating efficiency control group. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
All experiments were performed 3 times and/or performed in triplicate. A mean and standard deviation was derived from all repeated experiments. The apoptosis assays and clonogenic assays were evaluated using a Student’s t-test to compare treated groups to vehicle control. A one-way ANOVA comparison test was used to evaluate differences in gene expression among the KPT-335 treated and vehicle control treated groups for the quantitative RT-PCR assays and to compare multiple treatment groups in the cell proliferation assays. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
All the studies we performed were in vitro with cell lines and as such, no IACUC or approval was necessary. The cell lines have been available for several years and have been used in prior publications.
KPT-335 inhibits the proliferation of canine melanoma cell lines
XPO1 inhibition induces apoptosis of canine melanoma cell lines
Colony formation is inhibited by KPT-335
KPT-335 downregulates XPO1 protein expression while inducing a concomitant increase in XPO1 mRNA
KPT-335 modulates the expression of p53 and its downstream targets and localization of p53 and p21 in canine melanoma cell lines
Unlike malignant melanoma in humans which occurs primarily in the skin and is typically associated with exposure to UV irradiation, malignant melanoma in dogs occurs primarily in the oral cavity and nail beds . Approximately 60% of human cutaneous melanomas possess activating mutations in the cytoplasmic kinase BRAF whereas these mutations are not found in the canine disease [41, 42]. In both dogs and people, standard chemotherapy agents do not have substantial activity in either the primary disease or in the setting of metastasis [1, 3–7, 43]. While there are significant differences that exist between the clinical presentation and molecular biology of human and canine malignant melanoma, two recent review articles demonstrated that the diseases do share similar histopathologic features as well as alterations in both AKT and MAPK signaling pathways, with RAS and PTEN mutations present in tumors from both species [42, 44].
In human patients with melanomas that carry BRAF mutation the small molecule BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (Zorafenib) has shown significant activity with response rates of approximately 50%. Unfortunately, these responses tend to be short-lived, and most patients relapse within 8–12 months [45, 46]. More recently, monoclonal antibodies that block signaling of CTLA4 (ipilumimab, Yervoy) and PD1 (nivolumab) have induced durable clinical remissions in human patients with widely disseminated metastatic melanoma; when the two antibodies were combined, response rates were over 40% and in many instances, were durable [47, 48].
There are currently no monoclonal antibodies that block CTLA4 or PD1 available for use in veterinary medicine, and while the chemotherapy agent carboplatin has demonstrated some activity against primary oral malignant melanoma in dogs, there is no definitive evidence that any chemotherapy agents work in the microscopic disease setting. Recently, the Oncept xenogeneic melanoma vaccine was approved for use in dogs with oral malignant melanoma in the adjuvant setting following control of the primary tumor/local disease . However, many dogs still develop widespread metastatic disease necessitating the development of new therapeutic approaches.
Selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds that target the nuclear export protein XPO1 represent a potential target for therapeutic intervention in canine and human melanoma. Several studies have demonstrated that treatment of tumor cell lines with SINE compounds results in enhanced expression of p21 and p53, and redistribution of these proteins into the nucleus [26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 45]. With respect to melanoma, both p53 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb) undergo increased nuclear export preventing them from engaging in active tumor suppression . In canine melanoma p53 was shown to be excluded from the nucleus in 7 cell lines and 18 of 25 tumor samples . The importance of p53 activity independent of mutation status has been demonstrated in human melanoma and therapies that increase the activity of this protein have shown promise [52–54]. Following treatment of human melanoma lines with a variety of SINE compounds (KPT-185, −251, −276, 330) in combination with a small molecule BRAF inhibitor, stabilization of p53 was shown to be at least partly responsible for induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis . Furthermore, the combination of XPO1 and BRAF inhibition was found to be synergistic, also altering the expression of Rb and survivin .
Given the similarity of canine and human melanoma with respect to tumor suppressor dysregulation, we were interested in determining whether SINE compounds would exhibit biologic activity against canine melanoma cells. Several SINE compounds have been tested in vitro and found to have good activity at nanomolar concentrations against human prostate, renal, pancreatic, and breast cancer cell lines, as well as against a variety of cell lines representing hematopoietic malignancies (CLL, mantle cell lymphoma, NHL, AML) [25–28, 30, 31]. Currently, the SINE compound KPT-330 (selinexor) is undergoing evaluation in human clinical trials, while the SINE compound KPT-335 (verdinexor) has completed both phase 1 and 2 canine clinical trials. Significant activity against canine NHL was observed in vitro in the low nanomolar range against canine diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) samples, as well as in a canine DLBCL cell line . In the phase 1 setting, partial response to KPT-335 was observed in dogs with NHL, and unlike previously tested XPO1 inhibitors such as leptomycin B , KPT-335 exhibited good tolerability with anorexia and weight loss as the main clinical effects noted . Based on these findings, we elected to evaluate the potential utility of this SINE compound in canine melanoma lines prior to clinical testing in dogs with melanoma.
In the current study we found that KPT-335 inhibited the proliferation of canine melanoma cell lines with IC50 concentrations ranging from 71–330 nM. These doses are biologically relevant and achievable based on pharmacokinetic data derived from studies in both healthy dogs and dogs enrolled in the phase 1 and 2 studies . Furthermore, we demonstrated that KPT-335 induced apoptosis of the melanoma cell lines, although these effects were somewhat delayed, occurring at 72–96 hours after drug exposure. This delay in effect is concordant with prior data generated in human melanoma lines in which BCL-2 was not down regulated until 32 hours following exposure to SINE compounds . Additionally, in human leukemia cell lines treated with SINE compounds, cycle arrest was noted at 24 hours but IC50 values were best at 48 and 72 hours .
Although significant changes in proliferation or apoptosis were not found until 72–96 hours after drug exposure, the melanoma cell lines demonstrated changes in gene and protein expression at much earlier time points. This is likely a consequence of the manner in which tumor cells are disrupted. Inhibition of XPO1 results in a redistribution of nuclear proteins and consequently, an impact on gene transcription, largely due to restoration of tumor suppressor protein localization. This initiates a genome survey to determine whether sufficient critical non-repairable errors exist that necessitate induction of apoptosis. During this time, the cells may be able to compensate for changes in nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of key proteins for a period of time through such mechanisms as autophagy, until a critical point is reached and the process of apoptosis is initiated . The mechanism of action of XPO1 inhibitors is thus substantially different from that associated with small molecules that block known “driver” proteins often constitutively active through mutation, translocation or overexpression. In these cases, blocking the function of the driver protein typically results in rapid cell death as the tumor cell has become reliant on that particular protein for survival.
As expected, treatment of melanoma lines with KPT-335 increased the protein expression of p53 and p21 and the mRNA of p21 and MIC-1. There also was enhanced nuclear translocation of p21 and p53. Interestingly, the Mel 36 line, previously reported to be p53 null , was found to have basal p53 protein expression that increased after drug exposure. The reason for this discrepancy is not known, although it is possible there have been alterations in gene expression profiles over time. The effects of XPO1 inhibition on expression of these tumor suppressor proteins have been well-documented in a variety of human tumor cell lines treated with SINE compounds and this is likely a significant contributor to loss of cell viability [26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 45]. Prior studies with leptomycin B showed that prostate and neuroblastoma human tumor cell lines exhibited upregulation and activation of p53 that directly contributed to growth arrest and apoptosis [58, 59]. In contrast, apoptosis after inhibition of XPO1 can occur regardless of p53 status in some tumor lines indicating that this is not the sole mechanism for cell death . Human melanoma cell lines were shown to undergo apoptosis after SINE compound exposure regardless of p53 status and other mechanisms such as enhanced PUMA expression and decreased activation of NF-ĸB were found to be responsible . These data are concordant with our studies as all melanoma lines treated underwent apoptosis independent of p53 status.
In addition to effects on transcription factors, our data demonstrate a direct effect of KPT-335 on its target protein, XPO1. Downregulation of XPO1 protein was observed in melanoma cell lines as early as 4 hours after drug exposure and expression was nearly completely eliminated by 24 hours of treatment. These findings are concordant with those generated in human myeloma cells treated with the KPT-185 and KPT-330 . Similarly, human myeloma cells treated with the reversible XPO1 inhibitor CBS9106 exhibited downregulation of protein that was dependent on the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway . While protein was decreased, messenger RNA for XPO1 was increased in the canine melanoma lines following KPT-335 exposure, a finding also observed in human cell lines treated with the SINE compounds . This likely represents a compensatory mechanism associated with loss of functional XPO1 protein. In fact, upregulation of XPO1 message is now being used as a biomarker of target inhibition in ongoing human clinical trials of the SINE compound KPT-330 (selinexor) .
In summary, KPT-335 (verdinexor), a novel orally bioavailable XPO1 inhibitor exhibits good in vitro single agent activity against canine malignant melanoma cell lines as evidenced by inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. KPT-335 downregulated XPO1 protein while upregulating XPO1 message, indicative of direct effects on the intended target. The biologic effects of KPT-335 were demonstrated when cells were treated with nanomolar concentrations of drug which have been shown to be biologically achievable in dogs following oral administration. These data lay the groundwork for future clinical evaluation of KPT-335 in dogs with malignant melanoma.
We would like to thank Michael S. Kent at the University of California, Davis for providing the melanoma cell lines and Joelle Fenger for assistance with real time PCR as well as other aspects of the study design and research methods. Also thank you to Jerry R. Harvey for the images of the clonogenic assays and Tim Voijt for assistance with final figures.
- Withrow SJ, Vail DM, Page RL: Small animal clinical oncology. 2013, 321–333: 381-398.Google Scholar
- Bergman PJ: Canine oral melanoma. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2007, 22: 55-60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brockley LK, Cooper MA, Bennett PF: Malignant melanoma in 63 dogs (2001–2011): the effect of carboplatin chemotherapy on survival. N Z Vet J. 2013, 61: 25-31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dank G, Rassnick KM, Sokolovsky Y, Garrett LD, Post GS, Kitchell BE, Sellon RK, Kleiter M, Northrup N, Segev G: Use of adjuvant carboplatin for treatment of dogs with oral malignant melanoma following surgical excision. Vet Comp Oncol. 2014, 12 (1): 78-84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman KP, Hahn KA, Harris FD, King GK: Treatment of dogs with oral melanoma by hypofractionated radiation therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy (1987–1997). J Vet Intern Med. 2003, 17: 96-101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy S, Hayes AM, Blackwood L, Maglennon G, Pattinson H, Sparkes AH: Oral malignant melanoma - the effect of coarse fractionation radiotherapy alone or with adjuvant carboplatin therapy. Vet Comp Oncol. 2005, 3: 222-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rassnick KM, Ruslander DM, Cotter SM, Al-Sarraf R, Bruyette DS, Gamblin RM, Meleo KA, Moore AS: Use of carboplatin for treatment of dogs with malignant melanoma: 27 cases (1989–2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001, 218: 1444-1448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergman PJ: Anticancer vaccines. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2007, 37: 1111-1119. vi-iiView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alexander AN, Huelsmeyer MK, Mitzey A, Dubielzig RR, Kurzman ID, Macewen EG, Vail DM: Development of an allogeneic whole-cell tumor vaccine expressing xenogeneic gp100 and its implementation in a phase II clinical trial in canine patients with malignant melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006, 55: 433-442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergman PJ, Camps-Palau MA, McKnight JA, Leibman NF, Craft DM, Leung C, Liao J, Riviere I, Sadelain M, Hohenhaus AE, Gregor P, Houghton AN, Perales MA, Wolchok JD: Development of a xenogeneic DNA vaccine program for canine malignant melanoma at the Animal Medical Center. Vaccine. 2006, 24: 4582-4585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosenbaugh DA, Leard AT, Bergman PJ, Klein MK, Meleo K, Susaneck S, Hess PR, Jankowski MK, Jones PD, Leibman NF, Johnson MH, Kurzman ID, Wolchok JD: Safety and efficacy of a xenogeneic DNA vaccine encoding for human tyrosinase as adjunctive treatment for oral malignant melanoma in dogs following surgical excision of the primary tumor. Am J Vet Res. 2011, 72: 1631-1638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergman PJ, McKnight J, Novosad A, Charney S, Farrelly J, Craft D, Wulderk M, Jeffers Y, Sadelain M, Hohenhaus AE, Segal N, Gregor P, Engelhon M, Riviere I, Houghton AN, Wolchok JD: Long-term survival of dogs with advanced malignant melanoma after DNA vaccination with xenogeneic human tyrosinase: a phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 1284-1290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manley CA, Leibman NF, Wolchok JD, Riviere IC, Bartido S, Craft DM, Bergman PJ: Xenogeneic murine tyrosinase DNA vaccine for malignant melanoma of the digit of dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2011, 25: 94-99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ottnod JM, Smedley RC, Walshaw R, Hauptman JG, Kiupel M, Obradovich JE: A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of Oncept vaccine for the adjunct treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma. Vet Comp Oncol. 2013, 11: 219-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- London CA, Hannah AL, Zadovoskaya R, Chien MB, Kollias-Baker C, Rosenberg M, Downing S, Post G, Boucher J, Shenoy N, Mendel DB, McMahon G, Cherrington JM: Phase I dose-escalating study of SU11654, a small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in dogs with spontaneous malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 2755-2768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- London CA, Bear MD, McCleese J, Foley KP, Paalangara R, Inoue T, Ying W, Barsoum J: Phase I evaluation of STA-1474, a prodrug of the novel HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib, in dogs with spontaneous cancer. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e27018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen KT, Holloway MP, Altura RA: The CRM1 nuclear export protein in normal development and disease. Int J Biochem Mol Biol. 2012, 3: 137-151.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner JG, Dawson J, Sullivan DM: Nuclear export of proteins and drug resistance in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012, 83: 1021-1032.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner JG, Sullivan DM: CRM1-mediated nuclear export of proteins and drug resistance in cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2008, 15: 2648-2655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu D, Grishin NV, Chook YM: NESdb: a database of NES-containing CRM1 cargoes. Mol Biol Cell. 2012, 23: 3673-3676.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daelemans D, Costes SV, Lockett S, Pavlakis GN: Kinetic and molecular analysis of nuclear export factor CRM1 association with its cargo in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 728-739.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fornerod M, Ohno M, Yoshida M, Mattaj IW: CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell. 1997, 90: 1051-1060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Azmi AS, Aboukameel A, Bao B, Sarkar FH, Philip PA, Kauffman M, Shacham S, Mohammad RM: Selective inhibitors of nuclear export block pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and reduce tumor growth in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013, 144 (2): 447-456.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Draetta GG, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Sandanayaka V, Schechter S, Williams J, Nir R: Cytotoxicity of novel, small molecule, CRM1-selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: e14091.Google Scholar
- Etchin J, Sanda T, Mansour MR, Kentsis A, Montero J, Le BT, Christie AL, McCauley D, Rodig SJ, Kauffman M, Shacham S, Stone R, Letai A, Kung AL, Thomas L: KPT-330 inhibitor of CRM1 (XPO1)-mediated nuclear export has selective anti-leukaemic activity in preclinical models of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2013, 161: 117-127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lapalombella R, Sun Q, Williams K, Tangeman L, Jha S, Zhong Y, Goettl V, Mahoney E, Berglund C, Gupta S, Farmer A, Mani R, Johnson AJ, Lucas D, Mo X, Daelemans D, Sandanayaka V, Shechter S, McCauley D, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Chook YM, Byrd JC: Selective inhibitors of nuclear export show that CRM1/XPO1 is a target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2012, 120: 4621-4634.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCauley D, Landesman Y, Senapedis W, Kashyap T, Saint-Martin J-R, Plamondon L, Sandanayaka V, Shechter S, Froim D, Nir R, Williams J, Chin L, Benes C, Raza Mirza M, Kauffman M, Shacham S: Preclinical evaluation of selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) in basal-like breast cancer (BLBC). J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30 (Suppl): Abstract 1055Google Scholar
- Ranganathan P, Yu X, Na C, Santhanam R, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Walker A, Klisovic R, Blum W, Caligiuri M, Croce CM, Marcucci G, Garzon R: Preclinical activity of a novel CRM1 inhibitor in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012, 120: 1765-1773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang K, Wang M, Tamayo AT, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Lee J, Zhang L, Ou Z, Li C, Sun L, Ford RJ, Pham LV: Novel selective inhibitors of nuclear export CRM1 antagonists for therapy in mantle cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol. 2013, 41: 67-78. e64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etchin J, Sun Q, Kentsis A, Farmer A, Zhang ZC, Sanda T, Mansour MR, Barcelo C, McCauley D, Kauffman M, Shacham S, Christie AL, Kung AL, Rodig SJ, Chook YM, Look AT, Shacham S, Christie AL, Kung AL, Rodig SJ, Chook YM, Look AT: Antileukemic activity of nuclear export inhibitors that spare normal hematopoietic cells. Leukemia. 2013, 27: 66-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue H, Kauffman M, Shacham S, Landesman Y, Yang J, Evans CP, Weiss RH: CRM1 blockade by selective inhibitors of nuclear export attenuates kidney cancer growth. J Urol. 2013, 189: 2317-2326.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tai YT, Landesman Y, Acharya C, Calle Y, Zhong MY, Cea M, Tannenbaum D, Cagnetta A, Reagan M, Munshi AA, Senapedis W, Saint-Martin J, Kashyap T, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Gu Y, Wu L, Ghobrial I, Zhan F, Kung AL, Schey SA, Richardson P, Munshi NC, Anderson KC: CRM1 inhibition induces tumor cell cytotoxicity and impairs osteoclastogenesis in multiple myeloma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Leukemia. 2014, 28 (1): 155-165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- London CA, Bernabe LF, Barnard S, Kisseberth WC, Borgatti A, Henson M, Wilson H, Jensen K, Ito D, Modiano JF, Bear MD, Pennell ML, Saint-Martin JR, McCauley D, Kauffman M, Shacham S: Preclinical evaluation of the novel, orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) KPT-335 in spontaneous canine cancer: results of a phase I study. PLoS One. 2014, 9: e87585.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Chen X, Kent MS, Rodriguez CO: Establishment of a dog model for the p53 family pathway and identification of a novel isoform of p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Mol Cancer Res. 2009, 7: 67-78.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kent MS, Collins CJ, Ye F: Activation of the AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways and the inhibitory effects of rapamycin on those pathways in canine malignant melanoma cell lines. Am J Vet Res. 2009, 70: 263-269.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aina OH, Maeda Y, Harrison M, Zwingenberger AL, Walker NJ, Lam KS, Kent MS: Canine malignant melanoma alpha-3 integrin binding peptides. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011, 143: 11-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin TY, Fenger J, Murahari S, Bear MD, Kulp SK, Wang D, Chen CS, Kisseberth WC, London CA: AR-42, a novel HDAC inhibitor, exhibits biologic activity against malignant mast cell lines via down-regulation of constitutively activated Kit. Blood. 2010, 115: 4217-4225.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fossey SL, Liao AT, McCleese JK, Bear MD, Lin J, Li PK, Kisseberth WC, London CA: Characterization of STAT3 activation and expression in canine and human osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhong Y, El-Gamal D, Dubovsky JA, Beckwith KA, Harrington BK, Williams KE, Goettl VM, Jha S, Mo X, Jones JA, Flynn JM, Maddocks KJ, Andritsos LA, McCauley D, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Byrd JC, Lapalombella R: Selinexor suppresses downstream effectors of B-cell activation, proliferation and migration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia. 2014, 28 (5): 1158-1163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colombino M, Capone M, Lissia A, Cossu A, Rubino C, De Giorgi V, Massi D, Fonsatti E, Staibano S, Nappi O, Pagani E, Casula M, Manca A, Sini M, Franco R, Botti G, Caraco C, Mozzilo N, Ascierto PA, Palmieri G: BRAF/NRAS mutation frequencies among primary tumors and metastases in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30: 2522-2529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simpson RM, Bastian BC, Michael HT, Webster JD, Prasad ML, Conway CM, Prieto VM, Gary JM, Goldschmidt MH, Esplin DG, Smedley RC, Piris A, Meuten DJ, Kiupel M, Lee CC, Ward JM, Dwyer JE, Davis BJ, Anver MR, Molinolo AA, Hoover SB, Rodriguez-Canales J, Hewitt SM: Sporadic naturally occurring melanoma in dogs as a preclinical model for human melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014, 27: 37-47.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fong ZV, Tanabe KK: Comparison of Melanoma Guidelines in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand A critical appraisal and comprehensive review. Br J Dermatol. 2014, 170 (1): 20-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fowles JS, Denton CL, Gustafson DL: Comparative analysis of MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathway activation and inhibition in human and canine melanoma. Vet Comp Oncol. 2013, doi:10.1111/vco.12044. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Salas Fragomeni RA, Chung HW, Landesman Y, Senapedis W, Saint-Martin JR, Tsao H, Flaherty KT, Shacham S, Kauffman M, Cusack JC: CRM1 and BRAF inhibition synergize and induce tumor regression in BRAF mutant melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013, 12 (7): 1171-1179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beale S, Dickson R, Bagust A, Blundell M, Dundar Y, Boland A, Marshall E, Plummer R, Proudlove C: Vemurafenib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive malignant melanoma: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013, 31: 1121-1129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, Segal NH, Ariyan CE, Gordon RA, Reed K, Burke MM, Caldwell A, Kronenberg SA, Agunwamba BU, Zhang X, Lowy I, Inzunza HD, Feely Horak CE, Hong WQ, Korman AJ, Wigginton JM, Gupta A, Sznol M: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013, 369: 122-133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weber JS, Kudchadkar RR, Yu B, Gallenstein D, Horak CE, Inzunza HD, Zhao X, Martinez AJ, Wang W, Gibney G, Kroeger J, Eysmans C, Sarnaik AA, Chen YA, Kroeger J, Eysmans C, Sarnaik AA, Chen YA: Safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of nivolumab with vaccine in ipilimumab-refractory or -naive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013, 31: 4311-4318.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- USDA licenses DNA vaccine for treatment of melanoma in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010, 236: 495.Google Scholar
- Sulaimon SS, Kitchell BE: The basic biology of malignant melanoma: molecular mechanisms of disease progression and comparative aspects. J Vet Intern Med. 2003, 17: 760-772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koenig A, Bianco SR, Fosmire S, Wojcieszyn J, Modiano JF: Expression and significance of p53, rb, p21/waf-1, p16/ink-4a, and PTEN tumor suppressors in canine melanoma. Vet Pathol. 2002, 39: 458-472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volkenandt M, Schlegel U, Nanus DM, Albino AP: Mutational analysis of the human p53 gene in malignant melanoma. Pigment Cell Res. 1991, 4: 35-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jochemsen AG: Reactivation of p53 as therapeutic intervention for malignant melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2014, 26: 114-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu M, Breyssens H, Salter V, Zhong S, Hu Y, Baer C, Ratnayaka I, Sullivan A, Brown NR, Endicott J, Knapp S, Kessler BM, Middleton MR, Siebold C, Jones EY, Sviderskaya EV, Cebon J, John T, Caballero OL, Goding CR, Lu X: Restoring p53 function in human melanoma cells by inhibiting MDM2 and cyclin B1/CDK1-phosphorylated nuclear iASPP. Cancer Cell. 2013, 23: 618-633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newlands ES, Rustin GJ, Brampton MH: Phase I trial of elactocin. Br J Cancer. 1996, 74: 648-649.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pathria G, Wagner C, Wagner SN: Inhibition of CRM1-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport: triggering human melanoma cell apoptosis by perturbing multiple cellular pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2012, 132 (12): 2780-2790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pierdominici M, Barbati C, Vomero M, Locatelli SL, Carlo-Stella C, Ortona E, Malorni W: Autophagy as a pathogenic mechanism and drug target in lymphoproliferative disorders. FASEB J. 2014, 28 (2): 524-535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smart P, Lane EB, Lane DP, Midgley C, Vojtesek B, Lain S: Effects on normal fibroblasts and neuroblastoma cells of the activation of the p53 response by the nuclear export inhibitor leptomycin B. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 7378-7386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lecane PS, Kiviharju TM, Sellers RG, Peehl DM: Leptomycin B stabilizes and activates p53 in primary prostatic epithelial cells and induces apoptosis in the LNCaP cell line. Prostate. 2003, 54: 258-267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakakibara K, Saito N, Sato T, Suzuki A, Hasegawa Y, Friedman JM, Kufe DW, Vonhoff DD, Iwami T, Kawabe T: CBS9106 is a novel reversible oral CRM1 inhibitor with CRM1 degrading activity. Blood. 2011, 118: 3922-3931.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.