Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from sheep and goats in China

BMC Veterinary Research volume 18, Article number: 361 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few studies have molecularly characterized the potential zoonotic protozoa, Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep and goats in China, therefore total 472 fecal samples were collected from eight provinces and infection rates of three protozoa were determined by PCR analysis of corresponding loci. All PCR positive samples were sequenced to identify the genotype.

Results

The overall infection rates for Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi were 1.9% (9/472), 20.6% (97/472), and 44.5% (210/472), respectively. C. xiaoi (n = 5), C. ubiquitum (n = 3), and C. anderson (n = 1) were identified in goats. 97 G. duodenalis strains were successfully detected, and assembly E (n = 96) and assembly A (n = 1) were identified. Two novel G. duodenalis multilocus genotype (MLGs) were identified, with one belonging to subgroup AI and the other to subgroup E5. Nine known genotype (BEB6, CD6, CHC8, CHG3, CHG5, Peru6, CHG1, CHG2, and COS-I) and four new genotype (CHG26, CHG27, CHG28, and CHS18) were identified in E. bieneusi, with CHG3 dominant in this group.

Conclusions

The present results highlight the role of sheep and goats as reservoir hosts for this three gastrointestinal pathogens. In summary, we provided a platform for more detailed research on genotyping or subtyping intestinal pathogens to better understand their risks and modes of transmission.

Background

Cryptosporidium, Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi are three opportunistic pathogens infect humans and animals. Susceptible individuals infected by these pathogens may become asymptomatic; however, other patients can experience self-limiting diarrhea or severe wasting disease, especially those immunocompromised with human immunodeficiency virus [1,2,3]. To date 47 Cryptosporidium species and approximately 70 genotypes have been identified in fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals [4]. Most Cryptosporidium species and genotypes are host-specific; thus far, Cryptosporidium andersoni, Cryptosporidium bovis, Cryptosporidium ryanae, Cryptosporidium fayeri, Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium canis, Cryptosporidium scrofarum, Cryptosporidium suis, and Cryptosporidium xiaoi have been identified in sheep and goats [5].

Giardia duodenalis is composed of eight assemblages: A - H, of which A and B are more common in humans, but can infect a variety of animals [1]. Assemblages C- H mainly infect non-human species. Epidemiological data on G. duodenalis showed that the infections with A、E assemblages were more commonly identified in sheep in China, with assemblage E being the dominant one [6].

More than 500 different E. bieneusi genotypes, clustering into 11 groups, have been identified based on sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcriptional spacer gene (ITS) [7,8,9]. Group 1 comprises the zoonotic evolution group containing approximately 314 genotypes, of which, genotypes A, D, EbpC and IV are the most common [10]. Group 2 genotypes were previously considered host-specific and mainly infected ruminants, but several reports indicated that group 2 genotypes such as BEB4, BEB6, I and J infected humans and other animals [8]. Thus, group 2 genotypes pose potential risks to public health whereas genotypes in groups 3–11 appear to be more host-specific.

In recent years, Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi infection studies have been conducted in sheep and goats in China [6, 11,12,13]. However, most of these studies were limited to one region or one pathogen, thus the data were not fully comprehensive. Thereby, in order to estimate their zoonotic potential, we aimed to evaluate the molecular prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi infections among sheep and goats in China.

Results

The occurrence of cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi

The overall infection rates of Cryptosporidium, E. bieneusi, and G. duodenalis were 1.9% (9/472), 44.5% (210/472), and 20.6% (97/472), respectively. The prevalence of of Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi were 2.3% (8/352), 19.3% (68/352), and 47.7% (168/352), respectively in goats. In contrast, 24.2% (29/120), and 35.0% (42/120) of sheep samples were positive for G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). In addition, co-infections were detected in some samples, with the highest rate of 10.4% (49/472) observed between E. bieneusi and G. duodenalis.

Table 1 Infection rates and mixed infections of Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi in different regions
Full size table
Table 2 Prevalence and genotype distribution of Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi in goats and sheep in different provinces
Full size table

Correlation analysis

As shown (Table 3), significant differences of infection rates between E. bieneusi and G. duodenalis was observed in different regions (p = 0.000 < 0.01), however, there are no statistically significant in the infection rates of Cryptosporidium were in different regions.

Table 3 Correlation analysis of different factors on the infection of three intestinal pathogens
Full size table

Cryptosporidium infection rates were 0.8 and 5.5% in female and male animals (sheep and goats), respectively, indicating a significant difference (p = 0.016 < 0.05). Likewise, significant differences were also observed between E. bieneusi and G. duodenalis prevalence in different gender groups (p = 0.036 < 0.05, p = 0.000 < 0.01), respectively.

Also, E. bieneusi infection rates were 35.0 and 47.7% in sheep and goats, respectively, indicating a significant difference (p = 0.015 < 0.05). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in infection rates between Cryptosporidium and G. duodenalis in terms of sheep/goat breeds.

Cryptosporidium species

Three Cryptosporidium species, C. xiaoi (n = 5), C. ubiquitum (n = 3) and C. andersoni (n = 1), were identified in goats in this study(Table 2). The C. ubiquitum was identified in Jiangsu(n = 1) and Hainan(n = 2), and 100% similarity with to KT922236 in lambs in Ethiopia, and KT027437 in the eastern gray squirrel in the USA. C. xiaoi was identified in Henan (n = 1) and Jiangsu(n = 4), which was identical to the isolate derived from goats in China (KM199748 and KM199756). In contrast, C. andersoni was only observed in Hainan(n = 1), and 100% similarity with HQ007049 from cattle in Brazil.

G. Duodenalis assemblages and MLGs

There are 97 PCR positive samples amplified successfully at least one gene locus (SSU rRNA, bg, gdh, and tpi) of G. duodenalis, 60, 22, 37, and 50 sequences of above four genes were obtained, respectively. Two G. duodenalis assemblages, E and A were identified in these samples (Table 2). Of the SSU rRNA sequences, all E assemblages belonged to the subtype E1, with their sequences showing 100% similarity to the isolate derived from cattle in China (MN593002). Of these PCR positive specimens, 11 were successfully amplified at the other three loci, and formed five assemblage E MLGs and one assemblage A MLG (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic relationship between G. duodenalis assemblage E multilocus genotype (MLG). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using a mosaic dataset of bg, gdh and tpi gene sequences, and the topology obtained by the adjacency analysis was the same. ▲: The known genotypes identified in this study. △:Reference sequences are from the studies of Jin [14]. HN: Hainan, JS: Jiangsu, GS:Gansu. qh:Qinghai

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship between G. duodenalis assemblage A multilocus genotype (MLG). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using a mosaic dataset of bg, gdh and tpi gene sequences, and the topology obtained by the adjacency analysis was the same. Novel 1 represent isolates from this study. Reference sequences are from the studies of Cacciò [15] and Lebbad M [16]

Full size image

E.bieneusi genotypes

Based on ITS sequence analysis, a total of 13 genotypes were detected in the 210 positive samples from sheep and goats, including 9 known genotype: BEB6 (n = 45), CD6 (n = 24), CHC8 (n = 1), CHG3 (n = 96), CHG5 (n = 20), Peru6 (n = 1), CHG1 (n = 8), CHG2 (n = 8) and COS-I (n = 1), and 4 new genotype: CHG26, CHG27, CHG28, and CHS18 were detected in this study (Table 2).

The most prevalent E. bieneusi genotype was CHG3 (90/352, 25.6%) in goats, while BEB6 (24/120, 20.0%) in sheep. 10 out of 11 genotypes in goats detected in this study were clustered into group 2 based on phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences and reference sequences downloaded from GenBank, while only genotype Peru 6 was belonged to 1 (Table 2, Fig. 3). In contrast, six genotypes in sheep were located in group 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic analysis of E.bieneusi based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) nucleotide sequence. Genotypes were based on the genetic distance calculated by the Kimura two-parameter model (Saitou and Nei, 1987), and contiguous trees were constructed using the ITS locus. The self-test value is 1000 repetitions. ▲: new genotype identified in this study. △: Known genotype identified in this study

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, Cryptosporidium was only detected in goats, and its prevalence (1.9%) was lower than that in Henan (34.0%) [17], Qinghai (12.3%) [18], Inner Mongolia (13.1%) [19], and Sichuan (14.6%) [20]. This low prevalence may have been due to the fact that most stool samples were collected from asymptomatic flocks. It is accepted that Cryptosporidium is a major opportunistic pathogen, with humans and animals with low immunity more prone to infection [21]. Additionally, the true prevalence may be underestimated, as oocyst shedding was previously reported as intermittent or below PCR detection limits [22].

C. xiaoi, C. parvum, C. ubiquitum, C. andersoni, C. hominis were previously documented in goats [23,24,25,26,27]. In this study, we detected C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum and C. andersoni in goats, of which C. xiaoi was the dominant species. This finding agreed with other studies [17, 28]. However, goat studies conducted in Henan and Chongqing, reported that C. andersoni and C. ubiquitum were dominant species, respectively [26]. To date, many human infections caused by C. xiaoi and C. ubiquitum have been reported [29,30,31]. In our study, C. andersoni was considered a cattle-adapted species, only detected in Hainan. C. andersoni was first described in 2000 in the USA [32], but since then, several studies reports the parasite infects different animals [33]. Previous reports also showed that humans infected with C. andersoni were detected in several countries including the UK [34], Malawi [35], Australia [36], Iran [37], India and China [38]. Thus, C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum, and C. andersoni are human infections and require further studies to clarify their potential zoonotic transmission in China.

When compared with G. duodenalis epidemiological data in other regions, the overall G. duodenalis infection rate in goats (19.3%) across the eight provinces was higher than that reported in Sichuan (14.9%) [11], Heilongjiang (2.9%) [39] and Anhui (6.3%) [40]. The overall G. duodenalis infection rate in sheep (24.2%) was higher than that reported in Henan (6.7%) [6] and Qinghai (13.1%) [14], but lower than two studies from Australia (44.0%) and Brazil (34.0%) [41,42,43]. The G. duodenalis infection rate in sheep varied greatly from region to region, however this finding agreed with previous reports showing that global G. duodenalis infection rates in sheep had changed dramatically from 1.5 to 55.6% [1]. The reasons for this may be due to several factors: first, samples came from different regions across China, with different climatic conditions; second, animal age information was unclear; more young animals may have been farmed in some regions; third, poor sampling technology was to blame; and fourth, insufficient management systems were in place in some farms [43].

G. duodenalis assemblage E was dominantly detected in goats and sheep, in agreement with several reports. Assemblage E is accompanied by strong host specificity, and mainly occurs in cloven-hoofed livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs), but also spreads between other livestock and non-human primates [13, 44]. Assemblage E was also identified in humans in Egypt, Brazil and Australia [45,46,47]. These observations suggested that assemblage E may lead to zoonotic infection, therefore animals infected with this assemblage could be primary hosts for animal-to-human transmission.

In this study, the only MLG belonging to assemblage A was distributed in the same branch as the MLG AI-2 isolate [15]. No human case infected with MLG AI-2 have been reported, however, further studies should be carried out to determine if it is zoonotic or not. Five assemblage E MLGs were identified in this study, and were located in different branches of the same cluster. Moreover, they were located in different clusters from assemblage E MLGs sequences from Qinghai Tibetan sheep [14] (Fig. 1). These findings suggested different geographical distributions among isolates, in agreement with previous observations in Sichuan and Xinjiang [11, 48].

The overall E. bieneusi infection rate was 44.5%, which was the highest infection rate among the three intestinal pathogens. The infection rate across different regions varied significantly from 0.0 to 66.7% (p < 0.01), and was consistent with a goat and sheep study in another parts of China [49]. The E. bieneusi infection rate was 35.0% in sheep, similar to that in Gansu (34.5%) [13], but higher than that in Qinghai (23.4%) [50] and Liaoning (9.4%) [49]. The E. bieneusi infection rate was 47.7% in goats, similar to that in Shaanxi (47.8%); lower than that in Chongqing (62.5%) [49], but higher than in Anhui (7.5%) and Yunnan (8.9%) [20].

Based on ITS sequence analysis, 13 genotypes were identified, of which the BEB6 genotype was dominant in sheep in agreement with previous reports [12, 13, 49, 51]. Other studies also reported this infection genotype was identified in cattle, cats, and geese [33]. Additionally, BEB6 was shown to infect children without diarrhea in China [8], suggesting this genotype may pose particular health threats to children. The CHG3 genotype was identified in all regions and suggested a wide geographical distribution. However, in group 2, such as genotype J, BEB4, and BEB6, were reported in human cases [52]. These data [8, 52] confirmed that genotypes in group 2 displayed zoonotic potential.

Interestingly, when analyzing parasite infection rates by sex, the rate in males were significantly higher than that in females (p < 0.01). To the best of our knowledge, no other study have reported these observations, therefore the infection rates of these intestinal pathogens in goats and sheep may be gender-related. To verify the accuracy of this hypothesis, the molecular epidemiology of these gastrointestinal pathogens in goats and sheep of different genders must be investigated.

Conclusion

Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi infection rates varied across different provinces, with prevalence possibly related to sex. C. xiaoi, G. duodenalis assemblage E, and E. bieneusi BEB6 and CHG3 were the predominant zoonotic species/assemblages/genotypes identified in this study, with important roles in pathogen transmission from animals to humans. Based on MLG analysis, G. duodenalis may be geographically isolated in different regions. In summary, we provided a platform for more detailed research on genotyping or subtyping intestinal pathogens to better understand their risks and modes of transmission.

Methods

Sample collection

From April to August 2019, 472 fecal samples were collected from 352 randomly selected goats and 120 randomly selected sheep in eight provinces across China (Fig. 4). In these areas, the majority of farms used the captive feeding model (e.g. Henan, Hainan, Guizhou, Gansu, Jilin, and Jiangsu), one used the grazing (Liaoning), and one used semi-grazing/semi-stable feeding (Qinghai). These farms produced sheep of all ages in good sanitary conditions. (age analysis was not conducted in this study).. For each specimen, approximately 20 g freshly voided feces was opportunistically collected using sterile latex gloves and placed into clean plastic containers on ice in a cold box. Samples were transported to the International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, China, and stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate solution at 4 °C for later use. At the time of feces collection, no diarrhea was observed in animals.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of sampling locations in China. The figure was designed by Arcgis 10.2, and the original vector diagram imported in Arcgis was adapted from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com)

Full size image

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Approximately 200 mg fecal samples were used to extract DNA using the E.Z.N.A®. Stool DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA，USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA samples were stored at − 20 °C until required.

The small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene was used to screen Cryptosporidium samples by nested PCR amplification [53]. The SSU rRNA, β-giardin (bg), triose phosphate isomerase (tpi), and glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) genes were used to identify G. duodenalis samples [15, 54,55,56]. E. bieneusi samples were determined using ITS [57]. The amplification was performed in 25 μL reaction mixtures. Positive and negative controls were included (positive samples of three protozoa, and double distilled water was used as the negative control). All PCR products were analyzed using 1% (w/v) agarose gels stained with DNA Green (Tiandz, Inc., Beijing, China) and visualized with a fluorescence gel documentation system (ZOMANBIO, Beijing, China).

Sequence analysis

All positive amplification products were bidirectionally sequenced on an ABI PRISM™ 3730xl DNA Analyzer using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and all PCR positive samples were sequenced in both directions. To determine Cryptosporidium, G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi, genotypes, sequences were identified using reference sequences downloaded from GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using Clustal X 2.1 (http://www.clustal.org/). To evaluate multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of G. duodenalis, we only included specimens that were successfully subtyped at all three loci, whereas ambiguous sequences (double peaks) were not included for phylogenetic analyses. Sequences were concatenated for each positive isolate to form a multilocus sequence (bg + tpi + gdh). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net) using distance matrices calculated in the Kimura 2 parameter model. Tree reliability was evaluated using a bootstrap analysis with 1000 repetitions.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Software (http://www.ibm.com/products/spssstatistics). The prevalence with the 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also calculated. Differences in corresponding infection rates among locations, breed, and gender were examined by Fisher’s exact test, and differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

Representative nucleic acid sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to NCBI’s GenBank database under the accession numbers MN845610-MN845626 and MN833262-MN833285.

Availability of data and materials

All of the data used or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Representative nucleic acid sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to NCBI’s GenBank database under the accession numbers MN845610-MN845626 and MN833262-MN833285.

Abbreviations

G. duodenalis :

.

E. bieneusi :

.

C. xiaoi :

.

C. ubiquitum :

.

C. Anderson :

.

C. parvum :

.

C. hominis :

.

SSU rRNA bg:

.

gdh:

.

tpi:

.

ITS:

.

MLG:

.

References

  1. Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(1):110–40. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00033-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Beatriz L, Isabel L, Cristina A, Soledad F, Julio T, Del Aguila C. Intestinal Microsporidiosis due to Enterocytozoon bieneusi in elderly human immunodeficiency virus–negative patients from Vigo, Spain. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(7):918–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):80–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zahedi A, Bolland SJ, Oskam CL, Ryan U. Cryptosporidium abrahamseni n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiiae) from red-eye tetra (Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae). Exp Parasitol. 2021;223:108089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2021.108089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan U, Fayer R, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology. 2014;141(13):1667–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182014001085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang H, Qi M, Zhang K, Li J, Huang J, Ning C, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis isolated from sheep in Henan Province, Central China. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;39:330–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li W, Xiao L. Ecological and public health significance of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. One Health. 2021;12:100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li W, Feng Y, Santin M. Host specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and public health implications. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(6):436–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li N, Ayinmode AB, Zhang H, Feng Y, Xiao L. Host-adapted Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in straw-colored fruit bats in Nigeria. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;8:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santín M, Fayer R. Microsporidiosis: Enterocytozoon bieneusi in domesticated and wild animals. Res Vet Sci. 2011;90(3):363–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhong Z, Tu R, Ou H, Yan G, Dan J, Xiao Q, et al. Occurrence and genetic characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. from adult goats in Sichuan Province, China. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang Y, Wang Y, Wu Y, Niu Z, Li J, Zhang S, et al. Molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolated from Tibetan sheep and Tibetan goats under natural grazing conditions in Tibet. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2020;67(1):100–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Y, Chang Y, Chen Y, Zhang X, Li D, Zheng S, et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from Tibetan sheep in Gansu, China. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;64:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.06.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin Y, Fei J, Cai J, Wang X, Li N, Guo Y, et al. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Qinghai, China. Vet Parasitol. 2017;247:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cacciò SM, Beck R, Lalle M, Marinculic A, Pozio E. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis reveals striking differences between assemblages a and B. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38(13):1523–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lebbad M, Mattsson JG, Christensson B, Ljungstrom B, Backhans A, et al. From mouse to moose: multilocus genotyping of Giardia isolates from various animal species. Vet Parasitol. 2010;168:231–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng XQ, Tian GR, Ren GJ, Yu ZQ, Lok JB, Zhang LX, et al. Infection rate of Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in cashmere, dairy and meat goats in China. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;41:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li P, Cai J, Cai M, Wu W, Li C, Lei M, et al. Distribution of Cryptosporidium species in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Qinghai, China. Vet Parasitol. 2016;215:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye J, Xiao L, Wang Y, Wang L, Amer S, Roellig DM, et al. Periparturient transmission of Cryptosporidium xiaoi from ewes to lambs. Vet Parasitol. 2013;197(3-4):627–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. YuJuan SHEN, JianHai YIN, ZhongYing YUAN, WeiYuan LU, YuXin XU, LiHua XIAO, et al. The identification of the Cryptosporidium ubiquitum in pre-weaned Ovines from aba Tibetan and Qiang autonomous prefecture in China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011;24(3):315–20. https://doi.org/10.3967/0895-3988.2011.03.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Li J, Qi M, Li T, et al. Occurrence, molecular characterization, and assessment of zoonotic risk of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigs in Henan, Central China. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2018;65(6):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12634.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coklin T, Farber JM, Parrington LJ, Bin Kingombe CI, Ross WH, Dixon BR. Immunomagnetic separation significantly improves the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction in detecting Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2011;23(2):260–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871102300210 PMID: 21398445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karanis P, Plutzer J, Halim NA, Igori K, Nagasawa H, Ongerth J, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium from animal sources in Qinghai province of China. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(6):1575–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0681-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tzanidakis N, Sotiraki S, Claerebout E, Ehsan A, Voutzourakis N, Kostopoulou D, et al. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in sheep and goats reared under dairy husbandry systems in Greece. Parasite (Paris, France). 2014;21:45. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2014048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koinari M, Lymbery AJ, Ryan UM. Cryptosporidium species in sheep and goats from Papua New Guinea. Exp Parasitol. 2014;141:134–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.03.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang R, Li G, Cui B, Huang J, Cui Z, Zhang S, et al. Prevalence, molecular characterization and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. in goats in Henan and Chongqing, China. Exp Parasitol. 2014;142:11–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.04.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons MB, Travis D, Lonsdorf EV, Lipende I, Roellig DM, Roellig DMA, et al. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in humans, wild primates, and domesticated animals in the greater Gombe ecosystem, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(2):e0003529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mi R, Wang X, Huang Y, Zhou P, Liu Y, Chen Y, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in goats across four provincial level areas in China. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fayer R, Santin M, Macarisin D. Cryptosporidium ubiquitum n. sp. in animals and humans. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172(1-2):23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Adamu H, Petros B, Zhang G, Kassa H, Amer S, Ye J, et al. Distribution and clinical manifestations of Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in HIV/AIDS patients in Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(4):e2831. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002831.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Elwin K, Hadfield SJ, Robinson G, Chalmers RM. The epidemiology of sporadic human infections with unusual cryptosporidia detected during routine typing in England and Wales, 2000-2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(4):673–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268811000860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindsay DS, Upton SJ, Owens DS, Morgan UM, Mead JR, Blagburn BL. Cryptosporidium andersoni n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporiidae) from cattle, Bos taurus. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000;47(1):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00016.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang H, Lin X, Sun Y, Qi N, Lv M, Xiao W, et al. Occurrence, risk factors and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dogs and cats in Guangzhou, southern China: high genotype diversity and zoonotic concern. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02421-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leoni F, Amar C, Nichols G, Pedraza-Díaz S, McLauchlin J. Genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from 2414 humans with diarrhoea in England between 1985 and 2000. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(Pt 6):703–7. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46251-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morse TD, Nichols RA, Grimason AM, Campbell BM, Tembo KC, Smith HV. Incidence of cryptosporidiosis species in paediatric patients in Malawi. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(8):1307–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268806007758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Waldron LS, Dimeski B, Beggs PJ, Ferrari BC, Power ML. Molecular epidemiology, spatiotemporal analysis, and ecology of sporadic human cryptosporidiosis in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(21):7757–65. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00615-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Agholi M, Hatam GR, Motazedian MH. HIV/AIDS-associated opportunistic protozoal diarrhea. AIDS Res Human Retrovir. 2013;29(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2012.0119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu H, Shen Y, Yin J, Yuan Z, Jiang Y, Xu Y, et al. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium, Enterocytozoon, Giardia and Cyclospora in diarrheal outpatients in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang W, Wang R, Yang F, Zhang L, Cao J, Zhang X, et al. Distribution and genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned dairy calves in northeastern China's Heilongjiang Province. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gu Y-f, Wang L-k, Li Y, Li L, Chu X-h, Xin D-w, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Giardia lamblia isolates from goats in Anhui Province. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2014;32(5):401–3 https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2014&filename=ZJSB201405023&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=LDO1AcUwNKKJrvyelY5UH-UJyhzlHtngNQL3tD8gZnUBqj07qdmHWn-YY1oqjAXm.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Silva FMP e, Lopes RS, Bresciani KD, Amarante AF, Araujo JP Jr. High occurrence of Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and Giardia duodenalis genotype E in sheep from Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 2014;59(1):193–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0223-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ryan UM, Bath C, Robertson I, Read C, Elliot A, McInnes L, et al. Sheep may not be an important zoonotic reservoir for Cryptosporidium and Giardia parasites. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(9):4992–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu Y, Chang Y, Zhang X, Chen Y, Li D, Wang L, et al. Molecular characterization and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from yaks in Tibet, China. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2172-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Cui Z, Wang L, Cao L, Sun M, Liang N, Wang H, et al. Genetic characteristics and geographic segregation of Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle from Guangdong Province, southern China. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;66:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.09.019 Epub 2018 Sep 20. PMID: 30244091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Abdel-Moein KA, Saeed H. The zoonotic potential of Giardia intestinalis assemblage E in rural settings. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(8):3197–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5081-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fantinatti M, Bello AR, Fernandes O, Da-Cruz AM. Identification of Giardia lamblia assemblage E in humans points to a new anthropozoonotic cycle. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(8):1256–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zahedi A, Field D, Ryan U. Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis in humans in Queensland - first report of assemblage E. Parasitology. 2017;144(9):1154–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Qi M, Wang H, Jing B, Wang R, Jian F, Ning C, et al. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in dairy calves in Xinjiang, northwestern China. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):546. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1828-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Shi K, Li M, Wang X, Li J, Karim MR, Wang R, et al. Molecular survey of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep and goats in China. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1304-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Q, Cai J, Li P, Wang L, Guo Y, Li C, et al. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Tibetan sheep and yaks. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(3):721–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5742-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang H, Mi R, Cheng L, Huang Y, An R, Zhang Y, et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in sheep in China. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):587. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3178-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu F, Wu Y, Li T, Cao J, Wang J, Hu S, et al. High prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi zoonotic genotype D in captive golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellanae) in zoos in China. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13(1):158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1084-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Xiao L, Singh A, Limor J, Graczyk TK, Gradus S, Lal A. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium oocysts in samples of raw surface water and wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(3):1097–101. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.3.1097-1101.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Appelbee AJ, Frederick LM, Heitman TL, Olson ME. Prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from beef calves in Alberta, Canada. Vet Parasitol. 2003;112(4):289–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00422-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Bern C, Gilman RH, Trout JM, Schantz PM, et al. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(11):1444–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lalle M, Pozio E, Capelli G, Bruschi F, Crotti D, Caccio SM. Genetic heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of Giardia duodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(2):207–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.10.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Buckholt MA, Lee JH, Tzipori S. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine: an 18-month survey at a slaughterhouse in Massachusetts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(5):2595–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.5.2595-2599.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank International Science Editing (http://www.Internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by National Key R&D Program (2018YFD0501904), China Agriculture (sheep and goats) Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-38). The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this study. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, No. 218 Longzihu University Area, Zhengdong New District, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Penglin Wang, Ling Zheng, Linke Liu, Fuchang Yu, Yichen Jian, Rongjun Wang, Sumei Zhang, Longxian Zhang, Changshen Ning & Fuchun Jian

  2. International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Penglin Wang, Ling Zheng, Linke Liu, Fuchang Yu, Yichen Jian, Rongjun Wang, Sumei Zhang, Longxian Zhang, Changshen Ning & Fuchun Jian

Authors
  1. Penglin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ling Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linke Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fuchang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yichen Jian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rongjun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sumei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Longxian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Changshen Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fuchun Jian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JFC conceived the study and participated in its design. WPL, ZL, LLK, and JYC collected fecal samples and performed the experiments. YFC, and WRJ, ZSM helped in interpretation of data. ZLX and NCS performed the statistical analyses. WPL and LLK interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuchun Jian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In accordance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Administration Act of 1988, the research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Henan Agricultural University (Approval No. IRCHENAU-20190325-03). Permissions was obtained from farmers or animal owners before stool sampling, and none of the animals were injured during the specimen collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Zheng, L., Liu, L. et al. Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi from sheep and goats in China. BMC Vet Res 18, 361 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03447-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03447-6

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us