Skip to main content
Download PDF

Does zinc oxide nanoparticles potentiate the regenerative effect of platelet-rich fibrin in healing of critical bone defect in rabbits?

BMC Veterinary Research volume 18, Article number: 130 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Many encouraging studies confirmed the ability of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnONPs) in accelerating bone growth and mineralization. The use of Platelet Rich-Fibrin (PRF) as a sole filling material for large segmental bone defects remains questionable. The objectives are to investigate the regenerative efficacy of autologous Platelet Rich-Fibrin (PRF) and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnONPs) in repairing large segmental bone ulnar defects in a randomized controlled study in rabbits using computed tomographic interpretations. A 12 mm critical size defect was surgically induced in the ulna of 30 rabbits (n = 10/ group). In the control group, the defect was left empty. In the PRF group, the defect is filled with PRF. In the PRF/ZnONPs group, the defect is filled with PRF that was inoculated with 0.1 ml of 0.2% ZnONPs. Radiologic healing capacity was evaluated at the first, second, and third postoperative months.

Results

Statistical analysis showed significant differences in the radiologic healing scores between the groups (P = 0.000–0.0001) at all-time points (P = 0.000–0.047) during the study.

Conclusion

Rabbits in the PRF/ZnONPs group showed the highest appreciable bone quality and quantity followed by the PRF group with high quantity but low bone quality meanwhile, rabbits in the control group showed minimal quantity but medium bone quality. Interestingly, the addition of ZnONPs to PRF can accelerate the healing of ulnar critical-size defects in rabbits.

Peer Review reports

Study design

A 12 mm critical size defect was created in the diaphysis of the right ulnae in thirty healthy male white New Zealand rabbits (n = 10/ group). In the control group, the defect was left for healing without grafts. In the platelet rich-fibrin (PRF) group, the defect is filled with autologous PRF clot. In the combination (PRF/ZnONPs) group, the defect is filled with autologous PRF clot inoculated with 0.1 ml of 0.2% ZnONPs dispersion. Radiologic healing capacity between the groups was evaluated by immediate postoperative (PO) radiologic assessment and subsequently at the first, second, and third postoperative months.

Background

Critical size bone defect (CSD) is defined as the smallest intraosseous wound that does not heal spontaneously and there would never be complete bony regeneration despite surgical stabilization [1]. Despite it depends on the bone and the species of animal, the minimal size that renders the defect to be critical could be substantially determined as a segmental bone deficiency of a length exceeding 2–2.5 times the diameter of the affected bone and usually requires surgical intervention and bone reconstruction [2]. In veterinary practice, bone losses due to severe orthopedic trauma, oncologic resection, extensive debridement, and congenital malformations mostly lead to disability and dysfunction [3, 4].

The limitation of available reconstruction methods obligates resorting to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to achieve the goal of bone augmentation and complete bone regeneration that cannot occur in the absence of osteogenic or osteoinductive bone materials [5, 6]. Several studies have shown that bone regenerative procedures may be accelerated by the addition of biomaterial containing specific growth factors. These growth factors play a central role in hemostasis, fibroblast mitogenesis, angiogenesis, macrophage activation, and cell proliferation, and subsequently, the bone healing process by inducing neovascularization and chemotaxis, and stimulating collagen synthesis [7, 8].

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an autologous strong fibrin clot rich in platelets, fibrin; leukocytes; circulating stem cells; healing cytokines; the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α; the anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-4 and interleukin-10; vascular endothelial growth factor; insulin-like growth factor-I and II; epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-β1 and platelet-derived growth factor [9]. Additionally, PRF allows significant postoperative protection of the surgical site and seems to accelerate the integration, maturation, and remodeling, while enhancing bone graft density if combined with it [10].

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) are low toxic inorganic zinc-containing metal oxide nanoparticles that can be easily obtained through various methods and have received great interest in many fields, such as pollution treatment, food packaging, and biomedicine because of their ultra-violet filter properties and photochemical, antifungal, high catalyst and anticancer activities [11]. ZnONPs were used as excellent substitutes for antibiotics against multiple drug-resistant microorganisms and also possess osteogenic properties as they can accelerate bone growth and mineralization [12, 13].

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a relatively recent CT modality that uses a cone X-ray beam instead of the conventional fan-beam and is widely used for the clinical diagnosis of dental complications for its advantages over the conventional CT as relatively lower cost and radiation dose but the higher spatial resolution [14].

Although PRF has been used in several critical bone defects, to the best of our knowledge, no study has reported the use of PRF as a sole filling biomaterial or even with ZnONPs for long bone critical segmental bone loss. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the osteogenic efficacy of autologous PRF alone or in combination with ZnONPs for the repair of induced segmental critical-sized ulnar bone defects in a rabbit model using cone-beam computed tomographic interpretations.

Results

All rabbits regained independent feeding ability with a normal gait, following recovery from anesthesia. No apparent signs of local infection were observed, other than two rabbits in the PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups which suffered from infection and were excluded and replaced. The addition of biological grafts to a 12 mm segmental ulnar CSD showed remarkable radiological changes (Fig. 1 and Table 1), where statistical analysis showed significant differences in all CBCT evaluation criteria among the three experimental groups (P = 0.000–0.001) at all time-points (P = 0.000–0.047) during the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Graphs showing the Semi-quantitative (% of defect filling) and qualitative (scores) evaluation of newly bone formation using CBCT at the 30th, 60th and 90th days

Full size image
Table 1 Semi-quantitative (% of defect filling) and qualitative (scores) evaluation of newly bone formation using CBCT at the 30th, 60th and 90th days
Full size table

Concerning the quantitative evaluation of new bone formation in the CSD, treatment either by PRF either alone (PRF group) or in combination with ZnONPs (PRF/ZnONPs group) revealed a highly significant (P = 0.000) increase in the percent of CSD filling rate versus the control group (Fig. 2). On the 30th PO day, the percent of defect filling was 70.87 ± 2.30% and 92.50 ± 1.58%, respectively versus 34.25 ± 7.58% in the control group, while at the 60th PO day; the percent of defect filling was 83.23 ± 12.98% and 97.87 ± 1.25% respectively, versus 48.73 ± 4.87% in the control group. At the 90th PO day, complete filling of the CSD was non-significantly observed in both treatment groups where the filling percent was 99.83 ± 0.41% and 100.0 ± 0.0%, respectively, versus 74.75 ± 4.69% in the control group. Accordingly, the reduction score of CSD was significantly (P = 0.000) high in PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus the control group. The maximal reduction in the defect size was firstly recorded in the PRF/ZnONPs group on the 60th PO day.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Computed tomography 3D images of the ulna with CSD in control (1PO-1c), PRF (2PO-2c) and PRF/ZnONPs (3PO-3c) at the 1st (PO), 30th (a), 60th (b) and 90th (c) postoperative days showed a highly significant increase in the percent of CSD filling rate in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus the control group

Full size image

In terms of the bridging score (Fig. 3), complete bicortical bridging of the CSD was observed in both treatment groups as early as the 30th PO day versus no bridging in the control group. All rabbits (n = 10/10) obtained complete bridging at the 60th and 90th PO days in both PRF/ZnONPs and PRF groups, respectively. Unicortical bridging was obtained in the control group from the 60th day until the end of the study. Regarding the canalization score (Fig. 4), the recreation of the bone marrow cavity wasn’t started at all in the control group meanwhile, it started after the 30th PO day in both the treatment groups with significant differences between groups (P = 0.000) within all time-points (P = 0.000–0.037). A high canalization score was recorded in both treatment groups on the 60th PO day and a maximal canalization score was obtained on the 90th day in both treatment groups. Referring to the callus score (Fig. 3), rabbits in PRF/ZnONPs group expressed the minimal callus size while rabbits in the PRF group showed the maximal callus size. On the 90th PO day, statistical analysis showed a non-significant difference in callus score between both control and PRF groups. Results of this study showed that both time and treatment had a significant impact (P = 0.000–0.043) on ulna remodeling after the experimental establishment of CSD. High appreciable remodeling scores (scores = 3, 7, and 8) were observed in the animals of the PRF/ZnONPs group on the examined time points respectively, versus both in the PRF group (scores = 1, 5, and 6) and the control group (scores = 2.5, 2, and 2). The coronal CBCT images (Fig. 5) showed regression of the bone in the interosseous space between radius and ulna and a reduction in the callus size in the PRF/ZnONPs group indicating better remodeling versus both PRF and control groups.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Computed tomography sagittal plane images of the ulna with CSD in control (1PO-1c), PRF (2PO-2c) and PRF/ZnONPs (3PO-3c) at the 1st, 30th (a), 60th (b) and 90th (c) postoperative days showed complete bicortical bridging of the CSD in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus unicortical bridging in the control group. Notice abundant callus formation in PRF group versus both control and PRF/ZnONPs groups

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Computed tomography axial plane images of the ulna with CSD in control (1PO-1c), PRF (2PO-2c) and PRF/ZnONPs (3PO-3c) at the 1st, 30th (a), 60th (b) and 90th (c) postoperative days showed recreation of the bone marrow cavity in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus absence of canalization in the control group

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Computed tomography cross section images of the ulna with CSD in control (1PO-1c), PRF (2PO-2c) and PRF/ZnONPs (3PO-3c) at the 1st, 30th (a), 60th (b) and 90th (c) postoperative days showed extensive fusion between the ulna and radius with incomplete remodeling of the defect site in both PRF and control groups versus regression of the bone in the interosseous space between radius and ulna and a reduction in the callus size in the PRF/ZnONPs group indicating better remodeling

Full size image

Concerning the quantitative measurement of the bone densities (Fig. 6 and Table 2), results showed that time had a direct proportion significant effect on increasing the densities of normal ulnar bone (P = 0.000–0.012). Referring to the treatment method, results showed that the AOI of the PRF group had the relatively least bone density among the three groups at all time-points, while AOI of the PRF/ZnONPs group had the significant maximal (P = 0.000–0.009) density among the groups at all time-points. Consequently, when comparing the AOI densities of each group at each time to the normal ulnar densities, results showed that PRF/ZnONPs group displayed non-significant differences from the normal ulnar bone density on both the 60th and 90th PO day. Time showed a direct proportional significant effect on increasing the AOI’s bone densities in both the PRF and the PRF/ZnONPs groups (P = 0.000), versus the control group (P = 0.186). Both the control and the PRF groups were non-significant from each other in terms of AOI density from the 60th PO day till the end of the study.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Graphs showing quantitative bone densities of normal bone, new bone in-growth density (AOI density), and density of bone adjacent to the defect area (BAD density) in HU obtained by CBCT and expressed as mean ± SD at the 30th, 60th and 90th days

Full size image
Table 2 Quantitative bone densities of normal bone, new bone in-growth density (AOI density), and density of bone adjacent to the defect area (BAD density) in Houns Field units (HU) obtained by CBCT and expressed as mean ± SD at the 30th, 60th and 90th days
Full size table

The density of the bone adjacent to the defect (BAD) was significantly different between all groups (P = 0.000). Passage of time was shown to have a significant impact (P = 0.008–0.027) on the BAD density in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus the control group (P = 0.104). Both treatment groups were the most negatively affected groups on the 30th day while BAD density in the control group was the least affected and the nearest to the normal density. On the 60th day, the BAD density of the PRF/ZnONPs group had improved to be non-significant from the normal density while both the control and PRF groups were the most affected and non-significant from each other. On the 90th postoperative day, the BAD density of the control group was the least among the groups while it was non-significantly different between both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups. As an overall view, all BAD densities in all experimental groups were less than the mean of normal bone density at all time-points but an ascending manner was observed in both treatment groups along with the study while a descending manner was observed in the control group. A significant moderate negative correlation (spearman’s rho = − 0.547, P = 0.006) was observed between the BAD density and the level of callus score. In the control group, the callus increased significantly by the time and the BAD density decreased by the time. Meanwhile, in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups the callus score decreased with time and the BAD density increased.

Discussion

Bone repair in refractory cases of bone losses had represented a major difficulty in both veterinary and human practice. The presence of a large gap interrupts the progression of bone healing unless filling the gap with bone grafts or using distraction osteogenesis. The standard previous treatment modalities exhibit extremely high complication rates [2, 15]. Many efforts to develop new treatment modalities for segmental bone loss have resulted in designing new biodegradable implants that can incorporate novel osteogenic, osteoinductive, and/ or osteoconductive bone healing augmentation materials.

Ulna was selected in the present study because the fibro-osseous union with the adjoining radius proximal and distal to the surgical site is strong enough to act as a natural internal splint and support the animal during weight-bearing [16, 17]. Additionally, the relatively low cost, due to neither external nor internal fixation for the non-weight bearing ostectomized ulna, motivates this selection. Because the defect size is one of the substantial factors determining the degree and rate of bone union besides animals’ age, weight, and gender [18], a CSD of 12 mm diameter was selected after Gugala et al. [2] who declared that the segmental bone deficiency of a length exceeding 2–2.5 times of the diameter of the long bone can be considered the minimal size that renders the defect to be critical and usually requires surgical intervention and bone reconstruction. Generally, a bone osteotomy can be performed either by drilling [19, 20] or sawing [21, 22]. In this study, low-speed drilling was used under constant irrigation with normal saline to prevent thermal necrosis of the defect edges. After removal of the ulna segment, flushing of the defect with saline was mandatory in all groups to remove any resultant drilled bone swath materials which were used by many authors [23, 24] as morselized bone chips for their osteoinductive properties. Thus they could falsely affect the results and disturb radiographs and CT images.

From different bone tissue engineering models, PRF had been selected after several encouraging clinical studies which utilized PRF alone in CSD [23] or with bone cement on segmental bone defects [25], and resulted in better bone regeneration and good restoration of osteoblast attachment and subsequently bone healing [26, 27]. Additionally, autologous PRF that is obtained from the patient’s own blood contains several growth factors that contribute to tissue regeneration and healing in the defect area [28]. Furthermore, there is rare immunologic rejection and complications [29]. Most studies utilized the sole PRF for soft tissue repair [30] while using it as the sole filling material for large segmental bone defects remains questionable. Natural polymers such as gelatin, chitosan, fibrin, and collagen are commonly used along with each other or even as sole scaffolding materials in bone regenerative medicine [31, 32]. Consequently, we assumed that PRF can be used as a sole bio-scaffold for filling the ulnar segmental CSD with no need for additional solid osteoconductive material since fibrin matrix is the main constituent of PRF and ulna is a non-weight bearing bone. In this study, PRF was used for the first time in the treatment of segmental CSD without bone cement or bone graft. In our study, 4 ml of whole blood was used after Akyildiz et al. [33] for the preparation of autologous PRF for each animal and the eventual PRF clot was appropriate to the ulnar defect size as it wasn’t too small to prevent PRF-bone contact or too large to hinder the closing of the surrounding muscles without being ruptured.

Nanoparticles had been chosen to be involved in this study from the point of their rapidly growing concepts in tissue engineering for bone regeneration as mentioned by Mirzaei and Darroudi [34]. ZnONPs were selected because of their low toxicity, low cost and its availability compared to the other different natural non-organic metallic NPs [35], and Zn2+ ions are well-known to stimulate bone formation and mineralization and to have an active role in the proliferation of osteoblastic cells [36]. Although the low toxicity of ZnONPs, their solubility may contribute to cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction [37]. Therefore, their dispersion was diluted to 0.2% as recommended by Fielding et al. [38].

The three major properties that influence the selection of bone graft and its ability to promote fusion are osseointegration, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction and they must be completely biocompatible to reveal satisfactory results [39, 40]. Our experimental results showed that PRF and PRF/ZnONPs have osteogenic potential expressed by early reduction of the defect size, bicortical bridging of the defect, and recreation of the marrow cavity. Osseointegration was defined as the direct contact between living bone and implant at the light microscope level [41]. The osseointegration property of PRF could be attributed to the high tensile strength of the PRF clot in addition to its adhesiveness and stability [42]. Osteoinduction is the ability to produce signals that encourage primitive, undifferentiated, and pluripotent progenitor cells to differentiate into active osteoblasts. Zhou et al. [23] mentioned that PRF is considered a good medium for proliferation, differentiation, migration, and mineralization of cells during bone formation due to the progressive release of growth factors for more than 14 days in conjunction with fibrin net degradation after PRF application [43]. In terms of osteoconductivity, the ability to provide a scaffold for bone growth and vascularization [41], PRF can be considered as an excellent osteoconductive medium due to the fibrin matrix that exhibited an optimal environment for mesenchymal stem cells to adhere and differentiate [44,45,46]. From the same concept, great attention was paid to ensure graft-bone contact in order to obliterate any space which could prevent the osteoconductive property of the PRF.

All results of this study showed the superiority of the PRF/ZnONPs combination over the sole PRF clot in stimulation of bone healing in segmental CSD expressed by a faster reduction in defect size, higher bone density, lower callus size, and better remodeling with earlier canalization. Zhang et al. and Toledano et al. [12, 47] confirmed the ability of ZnONPs to enhance the osteogenic differentiation of the stem cells thus accelerating bone growth and mineralization. Zinc is an essential trace element naturally located at sites of tissue calcification, including osteons and calcified cartilage, and as bone mineralization increases, levels of zinc in bone tissue increase [48]. The alkaline phosphatase enzyme uses zinc as a cofactor involved in bone mineralization [49]. Zn2+ can also promote bone formation, growth, and mineralization [50]. All nanoparticles including ZnONPs can penetrate smaller blood capillaries and are amenable to be absorbed by the cells, allowing an efficient drug delivery to the target sites [51]. The biodegradable ZnONPs allows the release of drugs within the target site over a prolonged period ranging from days to weeks [52], and the full resorption of the PRF membrane was not fully achieved after 14 days, thus the release of the trapped growth factors and the other osteoinductive stimulators will last for more than 14 days [53]. In this study, the superiority of the PRF/ZnONPs could be attributed to the ZnONPs synergistic effect with the PRF fibrin mesh in trapping and slowly releasing the growth factors and the other osteoinductive stimulators in the target site and subsequently accelerating bone growth and mineralization.

The significant differences in the size of the radiologic callus between the experimental groups could be attributed to the PRF clot itself. The intact PRF clot that fills and bulges from the CSD in the PRF group could contribute to the abundant callus formation. Meanwhile, in the PRF/ZnONPs group, the PRF membrane was perforated during the injection of ZnONPs and resulted in a reduction in the size of the PRF clot, and subsequently, moderate to minimal callus size was observed.

As mentioned by Mäkitaipale et al. [54], the growing rabbits have a high bone growth rate and their bone density is positively proportional with the age of the rabbit. So, for evaluation of the AOI density at each time-point, the measurement of the normal bone density was a must at each time-point where a significant increase in the density of the normal bone was observed and the AOI in the PRF/ZnONPs group had restored the normal density as early as the second month of the study.

The HU attenuation measurements applied in CBCT scanning can theoretically represent, describe and compare different bone densities in various sites [55, 56]. Regarding the selected CBCT acquisition parameters, Haiter-Neto et al. [57] reported that more accurate lesion depth estimates were obtained at 0.125-mm voxel size (but not 0.16, 0.25, and 0.36 mm). Depending on these results, a voxel size of 0.125 mm was used in this study.

The PRF group expressed the least AOI bone densities at all time-points while the PRF/ZnONPs group provided the highest measurements. To explain this phenomenon, we must know that the proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells in secondary gap healing of CSD is proportional to the quality and the quantity of the collagen matrix where the larger the callus volume, the lower the bone density [58]. Results showed that the amount of the newly formed bone varied between the experimental groups; it was abundant in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups versus little in the control group. So the control group showed higher densities than the PRF group. On the contrary, PRF/ZnONPs group showed the higher density despite the abundant collagen matrix and this could be attributed to ZnONPs which have osteogenic potential by stimulating collagen synthesis, alkaline phosphatase activity, synthesis of osteocalcin releasing zinc ions, and generating Zn-OH which acts as bone apatite nuclei and results in accelerated mineralization [12]. Additionally, Toledano et al. [36] mentioned that Zn Scaffold combinations provided the highest regenerative efficiency for bone healing by producing more branches and junctions at the trabecular bone and achieving a higher number of osteoblasts.

Normally, in spite of its apparently static structure, bone tissue is dynamic and undergoes a constant remodeling cycle controlled by a balanced coupling between bone resorption (by osteoclasts) and bone formation (by osteoblasts) to ensure a constant bone mass and to maintain skeletal integrity. It is of crucial importance that the amount of bone resorbed matches the amount of newly formed bone in each remodeling site [59]. Of note, experimental studies used mice Prx1 as a periosteal marker demonstrated that local periosteum and endosteum are the primary source of progenitor cells that differentiate directly into osteoblasts and contribute directly to fracture callus [60,61,62] and unfortunately, bone marrow-derived cells have a very minimal direct contribution to fracture healing [63]. Generally, after fracture, the release of inflammatory mediators; cytokines, growth factors, and prostaglandins, all of which lead to chemotaxis of these periosteal and endosteal osteoprogenitor cells toward the defect site [64]. Our findings demonstrated that the early BAD density of both PRF treatment groups was significantly less than the normal. This may be attributed to the high mediators and subsequently the high chemotaxis of the progenitor cells and osteoblasts toward the defect site instead of the normal bone. Additionally, the results of the control group confirmed this explanation where the least chemotaxis of the progenitor cells toward the defect allows the normal anabolic action in the bone adjacent to the defect. Moreover, the negative correlation between BAD density and the callus score confirmed this explanation. Generally, further studies using cell markers are needed to explain the certain cause of altered BAD density.

Most of the studies on rabbits’ radii and ulnae showed an evident fusion between the two bones and this was explained by Bodde et al. and Kasten et al. [65, 66] as a biologic natural response from cells of the surrounding tissues such as the periosteum remnants above and below the defect, in addition to the membrana interossea found between the two bones, might be responsible for the clear synostosis between the radius and the ulna in these bone regeneration researches. In this study, extensive fusion was observed in the cross-section of CBCT images between the ulna and adjacent radius which appeared as one bone and this was considered a major feature indicating incomplete remodeling of the defect healing. However, by the end of the study, a regression of the bone in the interosseous space and a reduction in the callus size in the PRF/ZnONPs group indicate better remodeling versus both PRF and control groups. The remodeling score was greatly dependent on the sum of the canalization, the bridging, and the callus scores. Results of this study showed that the signs of remodeling were appreciable in the animals of both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups but not in the animals of the control group. The passage of time was shown to have a significant impact on the remodeling between all experimental groups reflecting the anabolic and catabolic coupled bone repair process [67, 68].

Conclusions

In conclusion, PRF enhanced reduction of the defect size, defect bridging by bicortical callus, recreation of marrow cavity, and remodeling while likely contributing to the formation of a huge callus of low density. The addition of ZnONPs to the PRF potentiates its effect by accelerating bone formation, and increasing bone quality and density.

Clinical significance

This study illustrates the felicitous regenerative effects of both PRF and ZnONPs in critical segmental ulnar defects in rabbits that highlights the possible application as complementary therapies in different intraosseous wounds that do not heal spontaneously which may attribute to the osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and osseointegration properties of PRF and the mineralization potential of ZnONPs.

Study limitations

Although PRF and ZnONPs exhibited great results in CSD bone regeneration, further histopathological, and histomorphometric examinations in addition to gene analysis are required to investigate their effects on CSD healing. Similar to other PRF studies, the application frequency should be verified with additional studies.

Methods

Animals and housing

A total of thirty healthy male New Zealand White rabbits, aged (mean ± SD) 4.0 ± 0.3 months and weighed 2.5 ± 0.5 Kg were allowed to acclimatize to their new conditions for 2 weeks before the start of the study and kept at the experimental animal room of the Surgery Department of Mansoura Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, at a constant temperature of 22° ± 1 °C, 55% humidity, and a 12-h light/dark cycle. They had free access to a standard rabbit diet and water ad-libitum throughout the experimental period. Animals were managed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt, and registration number (M/6) and all methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Experimental design

In all rabbits (n = 30), a mid diaphyseal critical size defect was ostectomized in the right ulna. Then rabbits were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10): Control group where no materials were applied, PRF group, where the defect was filled with autologous PRF, and PRF/ZnONPs group where the defect was filled with ZnONPs based on PRF.

Implants

Preparation of autologous PRF grafts

Autologous PRF was prepared from each rabbit in the PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups by one step simple centrifugation (Hettich EBA 8S centrifuge, D-78532 Tuttlingen, Germany) of autologous 4 mL of whole blood in a sterile 5 ml vacuumed plain glass tube (Shanghai Goldenwell Medical Technology Co, Ltd., China) at a rate of 3000 rpm for 10 min (RCF = 402×g) at a 45° rotor angulation with a radius of 40 mm [69, 70]. The blood separated into three distinct layers; the upper acelluar plasma, the middle a strong leukocyte-rich PRF clot and the lower RBCs layer. The obtained PRF clot, was placed carefully into the ulnar bone defect with particular attention to PRF-bone contact.

Zinc oxide nanoparticles

ZnONPs dispersion with a concentration of 20 wt.% in H2O (Sigma-Aldrich chemicals no, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt) was purchased and kept in a dark place at room temperature. The package contains 100 g of ZnONPs in a form of milky white color dispersion in a dark glass bottle (Table 3). ZnONPs dispersion was diluted to 0.2% according to Fielding et al. [38] using 0.9% normal saline.

Table 3 Specification of ZnONPs according to Sigma-Aldrich Co
Full size table

Surgical procedures

The preoperative antibiotic regimen included intramuscular injection of Cefotaxime sodium (Cefotax, EIPICO pharmaceutical company, Egypt) at a dose of 50 mg/kg an hour before surgery. General anesthesia was achieved using an IM injection of 7.5 mg/kg xylazine (20 mg/ml; Xylaject; Adwia Co, Egypt) and 35 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Ketamine 50 mg /10 ml, Rotexmedica, Germany).

On lateral recumbency and under complete aseptic preparation, a 4–5 cm long incision was made over the craniolateral aspect of the mid of the antebrachium where both subcutaneous tissue and antebrachial fascia were opened carefully. Using a periosteal elevator, the ulna was separated from the attached muscles then the bone was exposed by retraction of the muscles. Using a low-speed electric drill (APT, China) with a 1.5 ml diameter drill bit, A 12-mm segmental diaphyseal defect was ostectomized from the mid-shaft of the ulna under irrigation with 0.9% sterile saline solution. The periosteum was removed with the bone and great care was taken to avoid muscle damage. The defect was flushed using sterile normal saline solution (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The surgical procedures for induction of 12 mm critical size ulnar defect. A 5 cm long linear incision was made over the craniolateral aspect of the mid of the antebrachium (A). The ulna was exposed by retraction of the surrounding muscles (B) where 2 drilling holes with 12 mm apart were created in the mid-diaphysis (C). The defect was left empty in the control group (D), filled with PRF clot in the PRF group (E) or ZnONPs were inoculated into the PRF clot in the PRF/ZnONPs (F)

Full size image

In the control group, the defect was left empty while in both PRF and PRF/ZnONPs groups, PRF clot was used to fill up the defects and particular attention was paid to ensure graft bone contact. In the PRF/ZnONPs group, 0.1 ml of ZnONPs dispersion 0.2% (2 mg ZnONPs), was inoculated carefully into the PRF clot using an insulin syringe. Closure of the antebrachial fascia over the defect preceded closure of the subcutis using 3–0 vicryl (ETHICON, USA) then the skin was sutured using 3–0 silk (ETHICON, USA). A protective bandage was applied.

Postoperative management and follow-up

All rabbits were allowed to recover in an area warmed to 37 °C until they were fully awake. Afterward, they were moved to their cage. All animals received meloxicam (Anticox II 15 mg, ADWIA, Egypt) in a dose of 0.6 mg/kg for 5 days. The preoperative antibiotic regimen continued for 5 days. The incisions were dressed daily with povidone-iodine and bivatracin antibiotic local spray (ECAP, Egypt) then re-application of protective bandages was done. The feeding condition, weight, body temperature, and breathing were investigated daily. Additionally, animals were observed daily to evaluate the status of cutaneous wound healing and the movement function of rabbits till the end of the study.

Radiologic evaluation of healing

Both quantitative and qualitative bone healing evaluation criteria have been utilized to build a picture for the progression of healing up to 90 days in vivo PO period. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed on the 30th, 60th, and 90th PO days using an orthodontic-grade CBCT scan (120 kV, 5 mA; i-CAT FLX V17–19; Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, USA), at a clinically typical 0.125-mm voxel size and FOV dimensions of 16 cm diameter х 4 cm height. 3D images were reconstructed from the series of 2D projections using the classical filtered back-projection algorithm. The On-Demand 3D software app version.1.0.7510 (Cybermed, Korea) was used to produce 3D volume renderings. Visualization options included multiplanar orthogonal (coronal, axial, and sagittal) viewing angles. The Area of interest (AOI, the rarified bone in-growth) was identified visually from the original dense structure of the ulnar cortical plates based on observing longitudinal serial slices throughout the sample.

Compared to the baseline defect size (12 mm), all the CT images were visually analyzed by two independent reviewers in each group at each time-point for the presence of new bone formation and reduction of the defect size, bridging of the gap, callus size, and canalization of the marrow cavity. These criteria (Table 4) were determined according to modified scoring systems [65]. The remodeling score was calculated as the sum of the canalization, bridging, and callus scores.

Table 4 Modified radiological scoring system (Bodde et al. [65])
Full size table

The bone mineral density of the original dense structure of the normal ulnar cortex, regenerated bone in-growth (AOI), and the bone adjacent to the defect (BAD) were quantified using a quantitative CT method by Houn’s Field units based on Itoi et al. [21]. Due to the non-uniformity of the bone mineral density in the same CT image, five-point densities were measured with a specified 5 × 5 mm2 diameter region of interest (ROI) for each point and the mean ± SD was calculated. The mean of AOI densities of each group at each time (30th, 60th, and 90th PO days) was statistically compared with the total mean of the normal densities of the ulnar bone at the same time.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software program version 25. Both quantitative values (bone densities) and semi-quantitative values (percent of defect filling) were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were assessed using normal probability plots. Non-parametric qualitative data (reduction in the defect size, bridging score, canalization score, callus score, and remodeling score) were expressed as median (minimum-maximum) and were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric ANOVA. To assess the effect of PRF and ZnONPs, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data followed by Tukey-Kramer HSD for multiple comparisons. Results were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05. In addition, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was computed to assess the relationship between the BAD density and the extent of the callus in the CBCT.

Availability of data and materials

Not available.

Abbreviations

ZnONPs:

Zinc oxide nanoparticles

PRF:

Platelet-rich fibrin

PO:

Postoperative

CSD:

Critical size defect

CBCT:

Cone beam computed tomography

AOI:

Area of interest

HU:

Hounsfield units

BAD:

Bone adjacent to the defect

ROI:

Region of interest

References

  1. Roddy E, DeBaun MR, Daoud-Gray A, Yang YP, Gardner MJ. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(3):351–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gugala Z, Lindsey RW, Gogolewski S. New approaches in the treatment of critical-size segmental defects in long bones. Macromol Symp. 2007;253(1):147–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Rashidy AA, Roether JA, Harhaus L, Kneser U, Boccaccini AR. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:1–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vidal L, Kampleitner C, Brennan MÁ, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Reconstruction of large skeletal defects: current clinical therapeutic strategies and future directions using 3D printing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilipchuk SP, Plonka AB, Monje A, Taut AD, Lanis A, Kang B, et al. Tissue engineering for bone regeneration and osseointegration in the oral cavity. Dent Mater. 2015;31(4):317–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang XQ. Biomaterials for bone defect repair and bone regeneration. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017;52(10):600–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrahamsson SO, Lohmander S. Differential effects of insulin-like growth factor-I on matrix and DNA synthesis in various regions and types of rabbit tendons. J Orthop Res. 1996;14(3):370–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marui T, Niyibizi C, Georgescu HI, Cao M, Kavalkovich KW, Levine RE, et al. Effect of growth factors on matrix synthesis by ligament fibroblasts. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(1):18–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJJ, Mouhyi J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(3):e37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kökdere NN, Baykul T, Findik Y. The use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and PRF-mixed particulated autogenous bone graft in the treatment of bone defects: an experimental and histomorphometrical study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015;12(5):418–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Becheri A, Dürr M, Lo Nostro P, Baglioni P. Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles: application to textiles as UV-absorbers. J Nanopart Res. 2008;10(4):679–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang T, Liu J, Fellner M, Zhang C, Sui D, Hu J. Crystal structures of a ZIP zinc transporter reveal a binuclear metal center in the transport pathway. Sci Adv. 2017;3(8):e1700344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalpana VN, Devi RV. A review on green synthesis, biomedical applications, and toxicity studies of zno nps. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2018;2018:3569758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim D-G. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density? J Bone Metab. 2014;21(2):117–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafiei Z, Bigham AS, Dehghani SN, Nezhad ST. Fresh cortical autograft versus fresh cortical allograft effects on experimental bone healing in rabbits: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009;10(1):19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Einhorn TA. Clinically applied models of bone regeneration in tissue engineering research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367s:S59–67.

  17. Horner EA, Kirkham J, Wood D, Curran S, Smith M, Thomson B, et al. Long bone defect models for tissue engineering applications: criteria for choice. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(2):263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aalami OO, Nacamuli RP, Lenton KA, Cowan CM, Fang TD, Fong KD, et al. Applications of a mouse model of calvarial healing: differences in regenerative abilities of juveniles and adults. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(3):713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manassero M, Viateau V, Matthys R, Deschepper M, Vallefuoco R, Bensidhoum M, et al. A novel murine femoral segmental critical-sized defect model stabilized by plate osteosynthesis for bone tissue engineering purposes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013;19(4):271–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao M-D, Huang J-S, Zhang X-C, Gui K-K, Xiong M, Yin W-P, et al. Construction of radial defect models in rabbits to determine the critical size defects. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Itoi T, Harada Y, Irie H, Sakamoto M, Tamura K, Yogo T, et al. Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 combined with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells improves bone regeneration in canine segmental ulnar defects. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12:201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Wang W, Li M, Liu L. Repair of segmental bone defect using tissue engineered heterogeneous deproteinized bone doped with lithium. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou T, Yang H-W, Tian Z-W, Wang Y, Tang X-S, Hu J-Z. Effect of Choukroun platelet-rich fibrin combined with autologous Micro-Morselized bone on the repair of mandibular defects in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(1):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halalmeh DR, Perez-Cruet MJ. Use of local morselized bone autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cost analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e544–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bölükbaşı N, Yeniyol S, Tekkesin MS, Altunatmaz K. The use of platelet-rich fibrin in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate in the treatment of bone defects: a histologic and histomorphometric study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013;75:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thorat M, Pradeep AR, Pallavi B. Clinical effect of autologous platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of intra-bony defects: a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(10):925–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh A, Kohli M, Gupta N. Platelet rich fibrin: a novel approach for osseous regeneration. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11(4):430–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown AC, Barker TH. Fibrin-based biomaterials: modulation of macroscopic properties through rational design at the molecular level. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(4):1502–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang QL, Yang PP, Ge LH, Liu H. Preliminary evaluation of platelet rich fibrin-mediated tissue repair in immature canine Pulpless teeth. Chin J Dent Res. 2016;19(1):49–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee J-W, Kim S-G, Kim J-Y, Lee Y-C, Choi J-Y, Dragos R, et al. Restoration of a peri-implant defect by platelet-rich fibrin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(4):459–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Saravanan S, Leena RS, Selvamurugan N. Chitosan based biocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;93(Pt B):1354–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Akyildiz S, Soluk-Tekkesin M, Keskin-Yalcin B, Unsal G, Ozel Yildiz S, Ozcan I, et al. Acceleration of fracture healing in experimental model: platelet-rich fibrin or hyaluronic acid? J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1794–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirzaei H, Darroudi M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: biological synthesis and biomedical applications. Ceram Int. 2017;43(1):907–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Delahaut V, Rašković B, Salvado MS, Bervoets L, Blust R, De Boeck G. Toxicity and bioaccumulation of cadmium, copper and zinc in a direct comparison at equitoxic concentrations in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) juveniles. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0220488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Toledano M, Gutierrez-Pérez JL, Gutierrez-Corrales A, Serrera-Figallo MA, Toledano-Osorio M, Rosales-Leal JI, et al. Novel non-resorbable polymeric-nanostructured scaffolds for guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(6):2037–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vandebriel RJ, De Jong WH. A review of mammalian toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2012;5:61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Fielding GA, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S. Effects of silica and zinc oxide doping on mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed tricalcium phosphate tissue engineering scaffolds. Dent Mater. 2012;28(2):113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaz K, Verma K, Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Lonner B, Errico T. Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications. SAS J. 2010;4(3):75–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fu T-S, Wang I-C, Lu M-L, Hsieh M-K, Chen L-H, Chen W-J. The fusion rate of demineralized bone matrix compared with autogenous iliac bone graft for long multi-segment posterolateral spinal fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(Suppl 2):S96–101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gassling V, Purcz N, Braesen J-H, Will M, Gierloff M, Behrens E, et al. Comparison of two different absorbable membranes for the coverage of lateral osteotomy sites in maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(1):76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. He L, Lin Y, Hu X, Zhang Y, Wu H. A comparative study of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the effect of proliferation and differentiation of rat osteoblasts in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(5):707–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Doglioli P, de Peppo GM, Del Corso M, Charrier J-B. Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) stimulates in vitro proliferation and differentiation of human oral bone mesenchymal stem cell in a dose-dependent way. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(3):185–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gassling V, Douglas T, Warnke PH, Açil Y, Wiltfang J, Becker ST. Platelet-rich fibrin membranes as scaffolds for periosteal tissue engineering. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(5):543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang Y-H, Jeon SH, Park J-Y, Chung J-H, Choung Y-H, Choung H-W, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin is a bioscaffold and reservoir of growth factors for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(3–4):349–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Toledano M, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Osorio MT, Muñoz-Soto E, Toledano-Osorio M, Vallecillo C, et al. Zn-containing membranes for guided bone regeneration in dentistry. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(11):1797.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kambe T, Tsuji T, Hashimoto A, Itsumura N. The physiological, biochemical, and molecular roles of zinc transporters in zinc homeostasis and metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):749–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Coleman JE. Structure and mechanism of alkaline phosphatase. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:441–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cerovic A, Miletic I, Sobajic S, Blagojevic D, Radusinovic M, El-Sohemy A. Effects of zinc on the mineralization of bone nodules from human osteoblast-like cells. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007;116(1):61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shinde NC, Keskar NJ, Argade PD. Nanoparticles: advances in drug delivery systems. Res J Pharm, Biol Chem Sci. 2012;3(1):922–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Feng P, Wei P, Shuai C, Peng S. Characterization of mechanical and biological properties of 3-D scaffolds reinforced with zinc oxide for bone tissue engineering. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Faot F, Deprez S, Vandamme K, Camargos GV, Pinto N, Wouters J, et al. The effect of L-PRF membranes on bone healing in rabbit tibiae bone defects: micro-CT and biomarker results. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mäkitaipale J, Sievänen H, Laitinen-Vapaavuori O. Tibial bone density, cross-sectional geometry and strength in Finnish pet rabbits: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study. Vet Rec. 2018;183(12):382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Choi MK, Kim SM, Lim JK. Diagnostic efficacy of Hounsfield units in spine CT for the assessment of real bone mineral density of degenerative spine: correlation study between T-scores determined by DEXA scan and Hounsfield units from CT. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158(7):1421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim T-H, Lee D-Y, Jung S-K. Comparison of trabecular bone mineral density measurement using Hounsfield unit and trabecular microstructure in orthodontic patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Appl Sci. 2021;11(3):1028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(1):18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Paiva AG, Yanagihara GR, Macedo AP, Ramos J, Issa JPM, Shimano AC. Analysis of fracture healing in osteopenic bone caused by disuse: experimental study. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(3):e5076.

  59. Erben RG. Hypothesis: coupling between Resorption and formation in Cancellous bone remodeling is a mechanically controlled event. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Murao H, Yamamoto K, Matsuda S, Akiyama H. Periosteal cells are a major source of soft callus in bone fracture. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013;31(4):390–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Matthews BG, Grcevic D, Wang L, Hagiwara Y, Roguljic H, Joshi P, et al. Analysis of αSMA-labeled progenitor cell commitment identifies notch signaling as an important pathway in fracture healing. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1283–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ouyang Z, Chen Z, Ishikawa M, Yue X, Kawanami A, Leahy P, et al. Prx1 and 3.2kb Col1a1 promoters target distinct bone cell populations in transgenic mice. Bone. 2014;58:136–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Xing Z, Lu C, Hu D, Miclau T, Marcucio RS. Rejuvenation of the inflammatory system stimulates fracture repair in aged mice. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(8):1000–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mayr-Wohlfart U, Waltenberger J, Hausser H, Kessler S, Günther KP, Dehio C, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates chemotactic migration of primary human osteoblasts. Bone. 2002;30(3):472–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bodde EWH, Spauwen PHM, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. Closing capacity of segmental radius defects in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85(1):206–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kasten P, Vogel J, Geiger F, Niemeyer P, Luginbühl R, Szalay K. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing in critical-size long-bone defects. Biomaterials. 2008;29(29):3983–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yassine KA, Mokhtar B, Houari H, Karim A, Mohamed M. Repair of segmental radial defect with autologous bone marrow aspirate and hydroxyapatite in rabbit radius: a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Vet World. 2017;10(7):752–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Weivoda MM, Chew CK, Monroe DG, Farr JN, Atkinson EJ, Geske JR, et al. Identification of osteoclast-osteoblast coupling factors in humans reveals links between bone and energy metabolism. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Del Corso M, Diss A, Mouhyi J, Charrier JB. Tree-dimensional architecture and cell composition of a Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin clot and membrane. J Periodontol. 2010;81:546–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Watanabe T, Isobe K, Suzuki T, Kawabata H, Nakamura M, Tsukioka T, et al. An evaluation of the accuracy of the subtraction method used for determining platelet counts in advanced platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factor preparations. Dent J. 2017;5(1):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank staff members of surgery department of Mansoura University for their help and technical support.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Esraa Zalama, Gamal Karrouf, Awad Rizk & Alaa Samy

  2. Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry of Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Basma Salama

Authors
  1. Esraa Zalama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gamal Karrouf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Awad Rizk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Basma Salama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alaa Samy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EZ: Surgical procedures, data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing. GK: Study design, main supervisor, and manuscript editing and revision. AR: Study design, experimental operation, and manuscript editing. BS: Supplementation and preparation of ZnO nanoparticles inoculum. AS: Study design, experimental operation, statistical analysis, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript writing, and editing. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamal Karrouf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

“All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Egyptand registration number (M/6) and all methods are reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines”.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zalama, E., Karrouf, G., Rizk, A. et al. Does zinc oxide nanoparticles potentiate the regenerative effect of platelet-rich fibrin in healing of critical bone defect in rabbits?. BMC Vet Res 18, 130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03231-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03231-6

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us