Skip to main content

Protein expression of the tear film of domestic cats before and after inoculation with Toxoplasma gondii

Abstract

Background

Tear film (TF) helps maintain and protect ocular function against damage to the ocular surface. Proteins are one of its main constituents, whose expression pattern can be used as a biomarker of ocular changes and systemic diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of proteins in the TF of domestic cats before and after infection with Toxoplasma gondii, in the phases of acute infection and chronicity. Twelve healthy cats received orally homogenized brain matter obtained from mice inoculated with T. gondii oocysts, strain ME49. Cat feces were collected daily from the third day after infection to assess the release of oocysts. TF samples were obtained from cats, by Schirmer’s Tear Test 1, on day 0 (before infection), day 5 after infection (acute phase of infection, with maximum peak release of oocysts in feces) and on day 21 after infection (start of chronic phase, 7 days after total absence of oocyst release in feces). Tear samples were also submitted to proteomic analysis in a Q-Tof-Premier mass spectrometer.

Results

A total of 37 proteins with scores equal to or greater than 100 were identified on D0, followed by 36 on D5 and 42 on D21. Of these, 27 were common to D0 and D5, 33 to D0 and D21, 27 to D5 and D21, and 26 were common to the three groups, totaling 54 proteins. The most abundant proteins were lipocalin allergen Fel d, serum albumin, aldehyde dehydrogenase, lactoperoxidase and lactotransferrin. There was no significant difference in the abundance of proteins found on D0 and D5, but there was a statistical difference between D0 and D21 for ACT1_AEDAE, CERU_HUMAN and GELS_HUMAN. Regarding D5 and D21, there were significant differences for KV1_CANLF, LAC_PIG, TRFL_PIG, ACT1_AEDAE, CERU_HUMAN, GELS_HUMAN and OVOS2_HUMAN.

Conclusions

The main proteins identified in the TF of domestic cats are similar to those found in humans and other animal species. Most are part of the ocular surface defense system against injuries. The most expressed proteins in animals in the chronic phase of T. gondii infection are associated with the immune response to the parasite.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tear film (TF) is a viscous, trilaminar fluid that forms an interface between ocular tissue and air and consists of layers of components that cover the surface of the eyes, composed of proteins, lipids, water and electrolytes, which protect the ocular surface [1, 2]. The ocular surface, in turn, is constantly exposed to external and internal factors that can generate changes in its homeostasis, such as ultraviolet radiation and environmental pollutants, which generate oxidative stress [3], in addition to ocular and systemic pathologies [2]. In this context, the TF is of fundamental importance for the maintenance of a healthy ocular surface, as well as for defense against damage. Thus, the interaction between the TF and the corneal and conjunctival epithelium are crucial to maintain the ocular protective barrier [3, 4]. Among its main functions are lubrication of the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea; nutrition of the cornea through the transport of nutrients and metabolites to its surface; removal of foreign bodies from the conjunctiva and cornea; and maintenance of the surface for light refraction and defense against pathogens and harmful substances [1]. Therefore, tissue constituents such as proteins are essential for the functioning of these mechanisms [2].

Studies involving TF components, especially proteins, can help in the assessment of tear production abnormalities associated to ocular changes, such as in cases of keratoconjunctivitis [5]. Furthermore, research indicates that changes in the expression of proteins in the TF can also accompany systemic diseases, since proteins play an important role in combating pathogens, as mentioned above [2].

Toxoplasmosis is a widely studied systemic disease with significant importance for human and animal health. This is a zoonosis with worldwide distribution, caused by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, of which felids are the definitive hosts. Depending on the stage of infection, the disease can have different clinical signs in cats, such as depression, anorexia, jaundice, dyspnea, convulsions and ocular changes such as uveitis [6].

Although molecular studies of aqueous humor and tear samples have already been developed in human [7,8,9] and veterinary medicine [2, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16], only one study on the tear proteome of domestic felines has been published so far [17], carried out with healthy cats. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of proteins in the TF of healthy domestic cats before and after inoculation with Toxoplasma gondii, in the acute phase and start of the chronic phase of the infection.

Results

A total of 37 proteins with scores equal to or greater than 100 were identified on D0, while 36 were noted on D5 and 42 on D21. Of these, 27 were common to D0 and D5, 33 to D0 and D21, 27 to D5 and D21, and 26 were common to the three groups, thus totaling 54 proteins (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Venn diagram illustrating the number of proteins found in the TF of domestic cats, through mass spectrometry, in the different sample groups. Source: personal file

The PCA graph (Fig. 2) revealed that the accumulation of proteins expressed on D21 was grouped according to the day of collection, also indicating a distinct diversity in relation to day D0 and a proximity to day D5.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Graph. Subtitle: D0; D5; D21. Source: personal file

The proteins that predominated in the TF of healthy domestic cats were allergen feld 4 (lipocalin), serum albumin, aldehyde dehydrogenase, lactoperoxidase and lactotransferrin and others, which are identified in Table 1. In addition, the following were observed in cats after infection with T. gondii: malate dehydrogenase, serotransferrin, keratin, phosphoglycerate mutase, elongation factor, ceruloplasmin, gelsolin, crystalline alpha chain and annexin A1.

Table 1 Proteins identified in the tear of healthy and infected cats

Table 1 shows the abundance of each protein in each group. There was no significant difference (Student t-test, p ≤ 0.05) between the proteins found when comparing their abundance between D0 and D5. There was a statistical difference between D0 and D21 for the following proteins: ACT1_AEDAE (actin), CERU_HUMAN (ceruloplasmin) and GELS_HUMAN (gelsolin), all more abundant on D21; these proteins were above the fold change (Fig. 3A). Regarding D5 and D21, there was a significant difference (Fig. 3B) for: KV1_CANLF (kappa immunoglobulin), LAC_PIG (lambda immunoglobulin), TRFL_PIG (lactotransferrin), ACT1_AEDAE (actin), CERU_HUMAN (ceruloplasmin) and GELS_HUMAN (gelsolin), all more abundant on D21, in addition to OVOS2_HUMAN (ovostatin), more abundant on D5.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Abundance of proteins. Points above the horizontal line had significant abundance (t-test, p < 0.05). A Comparison between days D0 and D21. Proteins that have positive accumulation are represented by red dots (fold-change = 1.5). B Comparison between days D5 and D21. Proteins that had negative and positive accumulation are represented by blue and red dots, respectively (fold-change = 1.5)

The protein interaction network was constructed from Mus musculus proteins homologous [17] to those identified as differentially abundant in the F. catus TF (Table 2) on day 21 after inoculation with T. gondii. The network had a total of 490 nodes (proteins), 5782 connectors and eight clusters (Fig. 4).

Table 2 Mus musculus proteins homologous to the proteins identified in the cats’ TF
Fig. 4
figure 4

Interaction network. Proteins from M. musculus homologous to those identified in F. catus as differentially abundant on day 21 after inoculation with T. gondii. Each node represents a protein. The larger triangle-shaped nodes denote the proteins identified as having increased abundance, and the inverted triangle-shaped proteins represent those that were identified as having reduced abundance in comparison with the proteins identified on day 5. The proteins within the red square also had a significant difference of expression on day 21 after inoculation compared to proteins identified on day 0. The node degree is represented by the edge of the nodes, where wider edges correspond to greater node degrees. The betweenness value is represented on the blue tone scale. Clusters are numbered and separated into grids. One or two biological processes were assigned to each cluster. The p-value of the hypergeometric test with Benjamini & Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction is shown for each process

For each cluster, a genetic ontology enrichment analysis was performed, of which nine biological processes were assigned to the clusters, including: signaling pathway; defense and stimulus response; antigen processing; antigen presentation of endogenous peptide via class I MHC; and activation of plasma proteins involved in the acute inflammatory response. The expression level of each process can be related to the expression level of the protein identified in F. catus present in the respective cluster (Table 2).

Among the differentially identified proteins, actin-1 had the highest betweenness and node degree values (Additional file 1).

Discussion

The most abundant proteins in human TF are lipocalin, lysozyme, lactoferrin and serum albumin [18, 19]. Studies of animal TF have also been carried out [2, 11,12,13,14,15]. However, although there are studies of the tear proteome of healthy cats [17], none has been published so far on the protein expression of the TF of cats infected with T. gondii.

The results of this study demonstrate similarity between the tear components of domestic cats, humans [20] and other animal species, such as rabbits [11], which presented lactoferrin, albumin and lipocalin among the major proteins. Additionally, the results obtained by Shamsi et al. (2011) [2], who evaluated and compared the TF of humans, cows, sheep and camels, indicated similarity between the most predominant proteins in the species they studied (lactoferrin, serum albumin, lipocalin, lysozyme), some of which were also abundant in the samples evaluated by us. In the present study, proteins never described in the tear film of any species were also identified, such as allergen Fel d 4; major allergen 1 and elongation factor 1-alpha.

Regarding the most abundant proteins identified in the TF of the cats evaluated in this study, a brief discussion of the main functions of each in the ocular system is presented in Table 3. Those differently expressed (p ≤ 0.05) in animals after infection with T. gondii will be discussed in more detail.

Table 3 Most abundant proteins identified in the TF of the evaluated cats and their respective functions.

Although the strain of T. gondii used to infect the animals in this study was ME49, classified as moderately virulent in mice [21, 22], the results suggest that it was able to modify the expression of some proteins. In this sense, studies have shown that a high parasite load of a type II strain, such as ME49, is able to stimulate high levels of cytokines (in response to infection) similar to strain I, with greater virulence [22]. Additionally, according to Angeloni (2013) [23], this strain was able to stimulate the immune response through the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, although at lower intensity than the strain with greater virulence (RH), in infected trophoblast cells. These findings indicate that even being a less virulent strain, not associated with clinical ophthalmic signs [22], ME49 is able to stimulate the immune response, in line with the results of the present study, which revealed changes in the tear proteome after infection of animals, suggesting its ability to penetrate ocular cells. It should also be noted that the susceptibility of the affected species also influences the appearance of signs associated with infection. In general, regardless of the strain, immunocompetent cats tend to have asymptomatic evolution after infection with T. gondii [6], which may also explain why the animals in this study did not show clinical signs.

Regarding the proteins that showed a significant difference when their expressions on D21 were compared to D0, we suggest that the increase in actin, a component of the cytoskeleton of cells, is associated with the entry and persistence of T. gondii in cells of the ocular system of infected cats. This hypothesis is based on the results of a study that demonstrated that not only factors inherent to the parasite, but also components of the host, can facilitate the entry of T. gondii into cells of its tissues. Among these, the microtubules and microfilaments present in the host tissue stand out [24]. The authors concluded that 24 host proteins are involved in the entry of T. gondii into the host cell, of which six act by modifying the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, leading to its increase in the host cell’s periphery and thus facilitating the entry of the parasite, which in the present case possibly occurred in the cells of the ocular system. This reorganization of the cytoskeleton is represented in cluster 2 of the network, where actin is found. These findings help explain why actin was more strongly expressed in infected animals in the present study, since T. gondii can parasitize cells of the ocular system [6, 7]. Furthermore, in the network, actin is a hub and bottleneck protein due to the large number of connections that cross it and because it is a meeting point of two clusters, one of them represented by the transcription regulation process. It has been shown that an actin-based myosin engine is associated with transcription of ribosomal genes in the cell nucleus [25], suggesting that actin may also participate in regulating the expression of genes involved in T. gondii infection.

Gelsolin, in turn, is a modulating protein present in the actin filament, acting in its remodeling, which is important for cell locomotion and phagocytosis. It is responsible for cell differentiation, epithelial cell regeneration and apoptosis, and is expressed in all tissues of the ocular system and is secreted in the TF. It is more abundant in tissues belonging to the ocular surface compared to parenchymal organs [26, 27]. As mentioned above, since actin can be modified to facilitate the entry of T. gondii into host cells, possibly the increase in gelsolin was associated with this. The relationship between actin and gelsolin was represented in the network, since both proteins were within the same cluster (cluster 2).

Regarding ceruloplasmin, it is a ferroxidase found in plasma [28], about which studies indicate a high-affinity interaction with lactoferrin [29], which (as previously described) is one of the most abundant tear film proteins [2, 18]. We suggest that its high affinity with lactoferrin was a secondary cause of its increase in the samples evaluated, since lactoferrin showed increased expression on D21 compared to D5, as discussed below. In the interaction network, ceruloplasmin belonged to cluster 4, associated with the response to stimuli, with a close relationship with the cluster in which lactoferrin is located, of the defense immune response. Thus, the results of the network corroborate the analysis and interpretation of the data presented here.

Also with regard to D21, there was a significant difference in expressions, in addition to actin, ceruloplasmin and gelsolin, of lactotransferrin and kappa and lambda immunoglobulins, when compared to D5 samples. Ig kappa and Ig lambda are light chain immunoglobulins, components of the immune response, which also make up the cornea, where their concentration is related to the serum concentration of IgG. These immunoglobulins are probably derived from serum, since their levels in tear and aqueous humor are not high [30]. These immunoglobulins belong to cluster 2 of the network, related to the signaling mechanism. We suggest that the increased expression of these proteins comes from the immune response of infected cats, since there is an IgG response in animals infected with T. gondii, indicative of recent seroconversion or chronicity [31].

Lactotransferrin is produced by acinar cells of the main and accessory lacrimal glands. It is one of the proteins with the strongest antimicrobial action in the tear film, together with lipocalins, lysozyme and IgA [32]. Within the network, this protein belongs to cluster 3, represented by the defense response process. The increase in its expression on D21 can be explained by its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities and important role in innate immunity, helping to fight pathogens and maintain the health of the ocular system [33, 34]. Furthermore, lactotransferrin protects eye tract cells against oxidative damage [3], and cells producing reactive oxygen species have anti-toxoplasma activity [35]. Thus, it is possible that these cells acted to combat T. gondii and generated reactive species, responsible for oxidative damage, which triggered the increase in lactotransferrin.

Still regarding the comparison between the proteins observed on D21 in relation to D5, ovostatin was more abundant on D5. This protein is a metalloproteinase (MMP1, 3, 8), of the zinc-dependent endopeptidase family, important for the degradation and reabsorption of extracellular matrix components. Like other metalloproteinases, ovostatin is important for biological processes such as angiogenesis, morphogenesis and tissue repair [36]. In the interaction network, the homolog of this protein is related to clusters 1 and 5, represented by the processes of keratinization and nucleotide metabolism. Niehus et al., (2012) [37] reported that T. gondii components stimulate human macrophages to synthesize metalloproteinase, which would act in the degradation of the cell matrix collagen, facilitating parasite migration through tissues. Our research results corroborate the study cited above, since ovostatin is a metalloproteinase and its level was high in the acute phase of infection by T. gondii in the samples evaluated.

There was no significant difference in the expression of proteins from D5 samples compared to D0 due to the time required for the parasite, after infection of intestinal cells, to spread through the bloodstream and reach the cells of the ocular system, generating a response on the proteomic expression. A study with a murine model found that ocular alterations occurred in mice 15 days after infection with T. gondii, strain ME49 [38]. Thus, further elucidative studies are needed in this regard.

Additionally, although trypsin was identified in the samples evaluated, we suggest its presence wass due to the fact it was used during the preparation of tears for proteomic analysis.

Conclusions

From the results obtained, it was possible to identify 54 proteins present in the tear film of healthy domestic cats infected with T. gondii with a score equal to or greater than 100. Of these, 37 were components expressed in healthy animals. Most of the identified proteins are part of the ocular surface’s defense system against injuries. The most strongly expressed proteins in animals in the chronic phase of T. gondii infection are associated with the immune response to the parasite. Furthermore, an increase in actin was also observed, a protein that was possibly modified by the agent to facilitate its entry into the cells of the ocular system of infected cats.

It is important to know the proteins present in the TF of healthy domestic cats, as well as those affected by some pathology, since they can be used both as early biomarkers of diseases as well as for monitoring disease progress, as is already the case in humans and other animal species. Although other body fluids are already used for this purpose, TF is a good option, especially because its monitoring is noninvasive and it is easier to collect in felines compared to blood samples. Since this study was a pioneer in the proteomic evaluation of the tear film of cats infected with T. gondii, future studies should be carried out to better elucidate the use of the protein profile not only in cats affected by toxoplasmosis, but also by other diseases of clinical importance, a such as glaucoma, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, diabetes and numerous neoplasms. New studies can reveal more comprehensive results and enable the identification of effective biomarkers for diseases in felines, allowing better treatments.

Methods

Screening of animals

Twelve mixed breed domestic cats (Felis catus), of both sexes, were included in the study at 30 days of age and were monitored in catteries by the research team during the subsequent months. The animals were donated by the owners for research after formal consent. The selected animals were dewormed upon admission, immunized against the main infectious diseases of felines at 3 months of age, and castrated between 7 and 8 months of age. At approximately 15 months of age, the cats were infected with tissue cysts of T. gondii. After the end of the study, all animals were sent for adoption.

Before being infected, these animals were screened, which included physical examination, blood count, serum biochemistry, serology and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for FIV/FeLV; serology for T. gondii; and coproparasitological examination. The last two exams were performed every 15 days, from the admission of the cats until the infection with T. gondii, with all results being negative in both cases. Thus all the animals included in the study were negative for T. gondii and FIV/FeLV, and were healthy at the end of the study.

The project was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA), under protocols 003/17 and 024/15. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology’s (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and the NIH Statement and also followed the Cat-Friendly Practice guidelines.

Blood counts were performed using an automated hematology counter (ABC Vet, automated blood cell counter, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Commercial kits and a biochemical analyzer (BIO-2000 IL, Bioplus Produtos para Laboratórios Ltda, Barueri, SP) were used to measure levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, bilirubin, urea and serum creatinine.

For the diagnosis of FIV/FeLV, 5 ml of venous blood was obtained from puncture of the jugular vein, of which 2.5 ml was stored in tubes without ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and allocated for performance of the commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) serological test (FIV Ac FeLV Ag Test Kit), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The remaining 2.5 ml was stored in tubes with EDTA and submitted to genomic DNA extraction, using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen®), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To perform nested PCR, primers and the methodology previously described were used [39,40,41].

For the investigation of antibodies against T. gondii IgM and IgG, indirect immunofluorescence reaction was used, developed according to the description by Pinto et al. (2009) [42].

Toxoplasma gondii infection

A total of 26 female Swiss mice were used, weighing between 20 and 25 g, which received 40 oocysts of T. gondii strain ME49 (provided by professor João Luís Garcia, from State University of Londrina). This strain is considered to have moderate virulence and is not associated with clinical ophthalmic signs [21, 22]. The animals were maintained with commercial feed and water ad libitum and observed daily for 6 weeks. After these 6 weeks of infection, the animals were euthanized in a CO2 chamber. Then, to confirm the infection, their brains were removed and a fragment of each was evaluated (squashed) for the presence of T. gondii cysts, based on their morphology. These cysts were observed in all samples evaluated, and were quantified in a Neubauer chamber. Subsequently, the brains were homogenized and 800 T. gondii cysts were offered to each cat, orally, after 24-h fasting.

Coproparasitological analysis to confirm infection

After ingestion of the infected mice brains, for the coproparasitological evaluation of the infection phase, feces of the cats were collected daily, from the 3rd day until 30 days after infection. The samples were processed and examined by the modified centrifuge-flotation technique with sucrose solution, described by Sheather (1923) [43] and modified by Duszynsk and Wilber (1997) [44]. To identify the eliminated oocysts, stool samples were processed according to Dubey (2001) [45] and Gondim et al. (2002) [46].

Identification of phases after infection and tear collection

Tear samples were collected on days 0 (before infection), 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 21 (after infection). However, for proteomic analysis, in addition to the samples from day 0, those corresponding to days 5 and 21 after infection were selected for later comparison of results. The choice was based on the analysis of coproparasitological results, from which it was observed that peak of oocyst release in the feces occurred on day 5, characterizing the acute phase of the infection, as indicated by Galvão et al., (2014) [47]. After day 14, there was no further release of oocysts in the feces. Thus, we selected the sample on day 21, 7 days after the total absence of oocyst release in the feces, characterizing the beginning of the chronic phase.

Feline tear collection was performed with Schirmer’s Tear Test 1 kit (TLS-1). For this purpose, the standardized paper strip (5 mm notch) was inserted into the ventral conjunctival sac of both eyes and the length of the moistened portion was measured with a millimeter scale immediately after the protocol time (60 s). Subsequently, the wet strips obtained from the 12 cats were transferred to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and kept under refrigeration for 2 h. Then, the samples were centrifuged in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4 °C, to avoid evaporation, for 10 min, at 15000 xg, and were stored in three pools of supernatants: one pool of 12 samples from day 0 (D0), one from day 5 (D5) and one from day 21 (D21), which were frozen in triplicate, at a temperature of − 20 °C, until the moment of proteomic analysis. The samples were quantified by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.

Proteomic analysis

Enzymatic digestion with trypsin

The frozen tear samples were processed at the National Biosciences Laboratory (LNBio), belonging to the National Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), located in the city of Campinas, São Paulo.

Approximately 2 μL were pipetted from each sample pool (D0, D5 and D21). To start the digestion process, 22 μL of H2O was added to each sample pool to obtain a final volume of approximately 25 μL. The reactions were made in triplicate. Subsequently, 25 μL of urea and 0.5 μL of dithiothreitol (DDT) 0.5 mol L− 1 were added to each sample, which was incubated for 25 min at 56 °C. Then, 1.4 μL of 0.5 mol L− 1 iodoacetamide was added, and again incubated for 30 min at room temperature in a place protected from light. A volume of 0.5 μL of 0.5 mol L− 1 DDT was added to the samples, which were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in a place protected from light. The samples were diluted by adding 131 μL of 50 mmol L− 1 ammonium bicarbonate, 1.83 μL of CaCl2 and 3 μL of 20 ng μL− 1 trypsin. Between each addition and incubation, the tubes were shaken for 5 s and centrifuged for 10 s. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h (overnight) and later acidified (pH below 2) to stop the action of trypsin, by adding 4 μL of 100% formic acid.

Sample desalination

Once the acidification of the sample with a reagent tape was proven, the desalination process was carried out. For this process, the samples were added in stage-tips that received the addition of 100 μL of 100% methanol and 100 μL of 0.01% formic acid.

After several centrifugation steps, the stage-tips were inserted into new tubes (1.5 mL), with the addition of 100 μL of a solution of 20% ultrapure water + 80% acetonilate + 0.1% formic acid.

After centrifugation, the stage-tips were removed from inside the tubes and subjected to drying in a speed vac. Afterwards, the samples were analyzed with a Q-Tof-Premier mass spectrometer.

Mass spectrometry

For protein analysis, a 2.0 μL aliquot of peptides resulting from digestion with the protein was separated in RP-nanoUPLC (nanoAcquity, Waters) C18 column (100 × 100 mm) coupled to a Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer (Waters) with nanoelectrospray source at a flow rate of 0.600 ul min− 1. The gradient was 2–90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 60 min. Voltage was set at 3.5 kV, cone voltage at 30 V and source temperature at 100 °C. The instrument was operated in “top three” mode, in which an MS spectrum was acquired followed by MS/MS of the three most intense peaks detected. After MS/MS fragmentation, the ion was placed on the exclusion list for 60 s, and for the analysis of endogenous cleavage peptides, real-time exclusion was used. Samples were injected in triplicate.

Data analysis

For data analysis, spectra were acquired with the help of MassLynx v.4.1 software and raw data files (RAW files) were converted into a peak list format (mgf) by the software Mascot Distiller v.2.6.2.0, 2009 (Matrix Science Ltd). Subsequently, the data were compared against the general UniProt database, using the Mascot Daemon engine v.2.3.2 (Matrix Science Ltd), with carbamidomethylation as fixed modification and methionine oxidation as variable modification, loss of a trypsin cleavage, and 0.1 Da tolerance for ion precursors and fragments. The file merging was performed in triplicate. Proteins with a score equal to or greater than 100 were considered for analysis. The justification for the choice was based on the fact that protein scores are significant values pre-established by the bioinformatics tool that considers the most likely protein. Thus, the higher the score obtained, the lower the probability that the analysis is a random result. The results were analyzed using the Student t-test, with the Agilent Mass Profiler Professional 15.1 software, considering a significance of p ≤ 0.05 of the protein abundance between days D0 and D5, D0 and 21, and D5 and D21. In addition, the days of protein accumulation were plotted and separated by a principal component analysis (PCA) graph.

Systems biology

A network was built from Mus musculus proteins homologous to those identified in Felis catus as differentially abundant. The proteins were subjected individually to interactome analysis using the STRING version 11.0 database (http://string-db.org) with the following parameters: meaning of network edges: confidence; active interaction sources: text mining, experiments, databases, co expression, neighborhood, gene fusion and co-occurrence; minimum required interaction score: high confidence (0.700); max number of interactors to show: 1st and 2nd shell: no more than 50 interactions. The file for each network was downloaded in TSV format and later the files were merged and analyzed using the Cytoscape software version 3.8.2. The modularity and centrality properties (betweenness and node degree) of the network were calculated using the igraph package of the statistical tool R. For each cluster, an enrichment analysis of gene ontology was performed using the BiNGO version 3.0.4 plugin.

In the network, proteins are represented by nodes. The node degree (number of connections that cross the node) and betweenness (a node’s ability to join two or more clusters) properties were calculated. Proteins with an above-average degree of knotting are called hubs and proteins with an above-average betweenness are called bottlenecks. Both hub proteins and bottleneck proteins play an important regulatory role within the network.

Availability of data and materials

Most data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. The other data are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. 1.

    Davidson HJ, Kounen VJ. The tear film and ocular mucins. Vet Ophthalmol. 2004;7:71–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shamsi FA, Chen Z, Liang J, Li K, Al-Rajhi AA, Chaudbry IA, et al. Analysis and comparison of proteomic profiles of tear fluid from human, cow, sheep and camel eys. Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;52:9156–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Higuchi A, Inoue H, Kawakita T, Ogishima T, Tsubota K. Selenium compound protects corneal epithelium against oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shankardas J, Senchyna m, Dimitrijevich SD. Presence and distribution of 14-3-3 proteins in human ocular surface tissues. Mol Vis. 2008;4:2604–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hohenstein-Blaul NTU, Funke S, Grus FH. Tears as a source of biomarkers for ocular and systemic diseases. Exp Eye Res. 2013;117:126–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis – a waterborne zoonosis. Vet Parasitol. 2004;126:57–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bourdin C, Busse A, Kouamou E, Touafek F, Bodagui B, Le Hoang P, et al. PCR-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in blood and ocular samples for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:3987–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jones CD, Okhravi N, Adamson P, Tasker S, Ligthman S. Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18S rDNA genes of T. gondii in aqueous humor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:643–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Norose K, Tokushima T, Yano A. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121:441–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Couture S, Doucet M, Moreau M, Carrier M. Topical effect of various agents on gelatinase activity in the tear film of normal dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2006;9:157–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhou L, Beuerman RW, Barathi A, Tan D. Analysis of rabbit tear proteins by high-pressure liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:401–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hemsley S, Cole N, Canfield P, Willcox MDP. Protein microanalysis of animal tears. Res Vet Sci. 2000;68:207–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raposo AC, Portela RD, Masmali A, Cardoso-Brito V, Bernardo M, Oliveira DC, et al. Evaluation of lacrimal production, osmolarity, crystallization, proteomic profile, and biochemistry of capuchin monkeys tear film. J Med Primatol. 2018;47:371–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Raposo AC, Portela RD, Aldrovani M, Barral TD, Cury D, Oriá AP. Comparative analysis of tear composition in humans, domestic mammals, reptiles, and birds. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Terhaar HM, Allbaugh RA, MocheL JP, Sebbag L. Serum albumin and total protein concentration in the tear film of horses with healthy or diseased eyes. Vet Ophthalmol. 2020;00:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Winiarczyk M, Winiarczyk D, Banach T, Adaszek L, Madany J, Mackiewicz J, et al. Dog tear film proteome in-depth analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Veloso JF, Guedes PEB, Lacerda LC, Santana JO, Mora-Ocampo IY, Pirovani CP, et al. Tear film proteome of healthy domestic cats. Vet Med Int. 2021;2021:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Green-Church KB, Nichols KK, Kleinholz NM, Zhang L, Nichols JJ. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol Vis. 2008;14:456.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fu R, Klinngam W, Heur M, Edman MC, Hamm-Alvarez SF. Tear proteases and protease inhibitors: potential biomarkers and disease drivers in ocular surface disease. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46:70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tong L, Zhou XY, Jylha A, Aapola U, Liu DN, Koh SK, et al. Quantitation of 47 human tear proteins using high resolution multiple reaction monitoring (HR-MRM) based-mass spectrometry. J Proteome. 2015;115:36–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Boothroyd JC, Grigg ME. Population biology of Toxoplasma gondii and its relevance to human infection: do different strains cause different disease? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5:438–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saeij JPJ, Boyle JP, Boothroyd JC. Differences among the three major strains of Toxoplasma gondii and their specific interactions with the infected host. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21:476–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Angeloni MB. Influência de Toxoplasma gondii (cepas RH e ME49) na modulação da apoptose de células trofoblásticas (Linhagem BeWo). Tese (Doutorado em Imunologia e Parasitologia Aplicadas) – Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Minas Gerais. 2013;94.

  24. 24.

    Rajshekhar YG, Huynh M-H, Carruthers VB. A novel high throughput invasion screen identifies host actin regulators required for efficient cell entry by toxoplasma gondii. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fomproix N, Percipalle P. An actin-myosin complex on actively transcribing genes. Exp Cell Res. 2004;294:140–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sun HQ, Yamamoto M, Mejillano M, Yin HL. Gelsolin, a multifunctional actin regulatory protein. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:33179–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wittmann J, Dieckow J, Schröder H, Hampel U, Garreis F, Jacobi C, et al. Plasma gelsolin promotes re-epithelialization. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hellman NE, Gitlin JD. Ceruloplasminmetabolism and function. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:439–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sokolov AV, Voynova IV, Kostevich VA, Vlasenko AY, Zakharova ET, Vasilyev VB. Comparison of interaction between Ceruloplasmin and Lactoferrin/transferrin: to bind or not to bind. Biochemistry. 2017;82:1073–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Eiferman RA, Rodrigues MM. Unusual superficial stromal corneal deposits in IgGK monoclonal gammopathy. Arch Ophtalmol. 1980;98:78–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tekkesin N, Keskin K, Kllinc C, Orgen N, Molo K. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii: evaluation of two comercial immunoassay systems. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44:21–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yaginuma S, Akune Y, Shigeyasu C, Takano Y, Yamada M. Tear protein analysis in presumed congenital alacrima. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2591–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Balasubramanian AS, Pye DC, Willcox MDP. Levels of lactoferrin, secretory IgA and serum albumin in the tear film of people with keratoconus. Exp Eye Res. 2011;96:132–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hanstock HG, Edwards JP, Walsh N. Tear Lactoferrin and lysozyme as clinically relevant biomarkers of mucosal immune competence. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shrestha SP, Tomitaa T, Weissa LM, Orlofskya A. Proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii in inflammatory macrophages in vivo is associated with diminished oxygen radical production in the host cell. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:433–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tokuhara CK, Santesso MR, Oliveira GSN, Ventura TMS, Doyama JT, Zambuzzi WF, et al. Updating the role of matrix metalloproteinases in mineralized tissue and related diseases. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Niehus S, Elass E, Coddeville B, Guérardel Y, Schwarz RT, Debierre-Grockiego F. Glycosylphosphatidylinositols of Toxoplasma gondii induce matrix metalloproteinase-9 production and degradation of galectin-3. Immunobiology. 2012;217:61–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gazzinelli RT, Brézin A, Li Q, Nussenblatt RB, Chan C-C. Toxoplasma gondii: acquired ocular toxoplasmosis in the murine model, protective role of TNF-α and IFN-γ. Exp Parasithol. 1994;78:217–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hohdatsu T, Motokawa K, Usami M, Amioka M, Okada S, Koyama H. Genetic subtyping and epidemiological study of feline immunodeficiency virus by nested polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis ofthegaggene. J Virol Methods. 1998;70:107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Guimarães AMS. Detecção de Micoplasmas, Bartonelas e Vírus da Leucemia Felina em pequenos felídeos neotropicais mantidos em cativeiro no refúgio Bela Vista, Foz do Iguaçu. Dissertação (Mestrado em Epidemiologia Experimental e Aplicada às Zoonoses) - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, vol. 129; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Marçola TG. Estudo da avaliação laboratorial e ocorrência da infecção pelo vírus da imunodeficiência felina e coinfecções em felinos domésticos de diferentes localidades do Distrito Federal. Dissertação (Mestrado em Saúde Animal) - Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Brasília, vol. 80; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pinto LD, Araujo FAP, Stobb NS, Marques MST. Soroepidemiologia de Toxoplasma gondii em gatos domiciliados atendidos em clínicas particulares de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Cienc Rural. 2009;39:2464–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sheather AL. The detection of intestinal protozoa and mange parasites by a floatation technique. J Comp Pathol. 1923;36:266–75.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Duszynski DW, wilbwe PG. A guideline for the preparation of species descriptions in the Eimeriidae. J Parasitol. 1997;83:333–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dubey JP. Oocyst shedding by cats fed isolated bradyzoites and comparison of infectivity of bradyzoites of VEG strain Toxoplasma gondii to cats and mice. J Parasitol. 2001;87:215–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gondim LFP, Gao L, Mcallister MM. Improved production of Neospora caninum oocysts, cyclical oral transmission between dogs and cattle, and in vitro isolation from oocysts. J Parasitol. 2002;88:1159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Galvão ALB, Vasconcelos AL, Navarro IT, Bresciani KDS. Aspectos da toxoplasmose na clínica de pequenos animais. Semin Cien Agrar. 2014;35:1393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Apostolovic D, Sánchez-Vidaurre S, Waden K, Curin M, Grundström J, Gafvelin G, et al. The cat lipocalin Fel d 7 and its cross-reactivity with the dog lipocalin can F1. Allergy. 2016;71:1490–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bonnet B, Messaoudi K, Jacomet F, Michaud E, Fauquert JL, Caillaud D, et al. An update on molecular cat allergens: Fel d 1 and what else? Chapter 1: Fel d 1, the major cat allergen. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;14:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Smith W, Butler AJL, Hazell LA, Chapman MD, Pomés A, Nickels DG, et al. Fel d 4, a cat lipocalin allergen. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:1732–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wandalsen GF, Sano F, Solé D. Alérgenos do gato nas alergias respiratórias: situação atual e novas perspectivas. Arq Asm Aler Imunol. 2020;4:61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sebbag L, McDowell EM, Hepner PM, Mochel JP. Effect of tear collection on lacrimal total protein content in dogs and cats: a comparison between Schirmer strips and ophthalmic sponges. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:61–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhou L, Zhao SZ, Koh SK, Chen L, Vaz C, Tanavde V, et al. In depth analysis of the human tear proteome. J Proteome. 2012;75:3877–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Koppaka V, Thompson DC, Chen Y, Ellermann M, Nicolaou KC, Juvonen RO, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: a comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharmacol Ver. 2012;64:520–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Marchitti AS, Chen Y, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V. Ultraviolet radiation: cellular antioxidant response and the role of ocular aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:206–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kussendrager KD, Van Hooijdonk ACM. Lactoperoxidase: physico-chemical properties, occurrence, mechanism of action and applications. B J Nutri. 2000;84:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Eckenroth BE, Mason AB, Mcdevitt ME, Lamber LA, Everse SJ. The structure and evolution of the murine inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase: a member of the transferrin superfamily. Protein Sci. 2010;19:1616–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sugiura Y, Soeta S, Ichihara N, Nishita T, Murakami M, Amasaki H, et al. Immunohistolocalization and gene expression of the carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes (CA-II and CA-VI) in glands associated with the canine lacrimal apparatus. Anat Histol Embryol. 2010;39:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ligtenberg AJM, Karlsson NG, Veerman ECI. Deleted in malignant brain tumors-1 protein (DMBT1): a pattern recognition receptor with multiple binding sites. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:5212–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ananthi S, Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Valarnila M, Dharmalingam K. Pathogen induced changes in the protein profile of human tears from fusarium keratitis patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Freitas DRJ, Junior ISV, Masuda A. Expressão e atividade enzimática de glutationa s-transferase em tecidos de fêmeas de Boophilus microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2008;17:99–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zernii EY, Golovastova MO, Baksheeva VE, Kabanova EY, Ishutina EI, Gancharova OS, et al. Alterations in tear biochemistry associated with postanesthetic chronic dry eye syndrome. Biochemistry. 2016;81:1549–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Machado CMM, Valim IML. Receptores para imunoglobulina G (FcgR). Medicina. 2005;38:82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Broadhurst MJ, Leung JM, Lim KC, Girgis NM, Gundra UM, Fallon PG, et al. Upregulation of retinal dehydrogenase 2 in alternatively activated macrophages during retinoiddependent type-2 immunity to helminth infection in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kuizenga A, Stolwijk TR, Van Agtmaa EJ, Van Haeringen NJ, Kijlstra A. Detection of secretory IgM in tears of IgA deficient individuals. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:997–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Elhodaky M, Diamond AM. Selenium-binding protein 1 in human health ad disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhou L, Beuerman RW, Chan CM, Zhao SZ, Li XR, Yang H, et al. Identification of tear fluid biomarkers in dry eye syndrome using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:4889–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Guo Q, Huang H, Pi Y, Zhang H. Evaluation of tear malate dehydrogenase 2 in mild dry eye disease. Eye Sci. 2014;29:204–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Van Haeringen NJ, Glasius E. The origin of some enzymes in tear fluid, determined by comparative investigation with two collection methods. Exp Eye Res. 1976;22:267–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Fullard RJ, Carney LG. Diurnal variation in human tear enzymes. Exp Eye Res. 1884;38:15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hegarty DM, David LL, Aicher SA. Lacrimal gland denervation alters tear protein composition and impairs ipsilateral eye closures and corneal nociception. Invest Ophtalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:5217–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Palaniappan CK, Schütt BS, Bräuer L, Schicht M, Millar TJ. Effects of keratin and lung surfactant proteins on the surface activity of Meibomian lipids. Invest Ophtalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2571–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Wu Y, Liu Q, To CH, Li KK, Chun RKM, Yu JFJ, et al. Differential retinal protein expressions during form deprivation myopia in albino guinea pigs. Curr Proteom. 2014;11:37–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Hitosugi T, Zhou L, Elf S, Fan J, Kang H-B, Seo JH, et al. Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 coordinates glycolysis and biosynthesis to promote tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:585–600.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Jakobsson ME, Małeck J, Falnes P. Regulation of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha (eEF1A) by dynamic lysine methylation. RNA Biol. 2018;15:314–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lee S, Ann DK, Wang E. Cloning of human and mouse brain cDNA coding for S1, the second member of the mammalian elongation fator-1 alpha gene family: analisys of a possible evolutionary pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;203:1371–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Horwitz J. Alpha-crystallin. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:145–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    May CA, Welge-Lüßen U, Jünemann A, Bloemendal H, Lütjen-Drecoll E. αB-Crystallin in lacrimal gland duct and tears. Curr Eye Res. 2000;21:588–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Girol AP, Mimura KKO, Drewes CC, Bolonheis SM, Solito E, Farsky SHP, et al. Anti-inflamatory mechanisms of annexin A1 protein and its mimetic peptide Ac2-26 in models of ocular inflammation in vivo and in vitro. J Immunol. 2013;190:5689–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sugimoto MA, Vago JP, Teixeira MM, Sousa LP. Annexin A1 and the resolution of inflammation: modulation of neutrophil recruitment, apoptosis, and clearance. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yazid S, Leonardi A, Calder V, Flower R. Identification of the anti-inflammatory Annexin-A1 protein in tears of normal subjects and association of its cleaved-inactive form with active vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:6280.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), belonging to the National Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Brazil for their support with the use of equipments (such as Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer), and to all researchers and technicians who collaborated with the execution of the proteomic analysis of the samples, especially Bianca Alves Pauletti and Romênia Ramos Domingues. To professor João Luís Garcia, from State University of Londrina, for giving the strain ME49.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 – offering schoolarships; Fapesb (APP0028/2016); CNPq (430375/2016-6).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JFV and RSAC performed the ophthalmic examination of all cats. JFV and PEBG collected and processed all of the tear samples. PEBG, JOS and IYM-O analyzed and interpreted the results obtained. LCL, RDSC and ADM selected and clinically evaluated all cats included in the study. JOS, IYM-O and CPP assisted in the processing and proteomic analysis of the samples. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript; everyone read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Elisa Brandão Guedes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA), under protocols 003/17 and 024/15. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology’s (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and the NIH Statement and also followed the Cat-Friendly Practice guidelines.

The animals included in the study were donated by the owners for research after formal consent.

The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guedes, P.E.B., Veloso, J.F., Lacerda, L.C. et al. Protein expression of the tear film of domestic cats before and after inoculation with Toxoplasma gondii. BMC Vet Res 17, 386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03080-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03080-9

Keywords

  • Felis catus
  • Proteome
  • Teardrop
  • Toxoplasmosis