Skip to main content

Development of in-vitro maturation protocol for rat oocytes; under simple culture vs co-culture with cumulus cell monolayer and its developmental potential via Parthenogenetic/artificial activation



Murine is the most abundantly used as laboratory animal models. There has been a tremendous amount of research including; their evolution, growth, physiology, disease modeling as well as genomic mapping. Rats and mice are the most widely used among them. Although both rats and mice fall under the same category still both are different a lot too. As regarding in vitro maturation and development mouse studies are well established as compared to rats which still lies in the early phase of development. So, we tried to figure out rat oocytes in vitro maturation and their developmental potential by performing 3 experiments i.e. superovulation, in vitro Maturation as simple culture (COC’s only), and COC’s & cumulus cells co-culture, which later further developed using parthenogenetic activation after IVM. Female Sprague Dawley rat 3–4 week used for these studies, we hyper-stimulated their ovaries using PMSG and hCG 150 IU/kg each. After that, we collected ovaries via dissection and retrieved oocytes. We matured them in TCM 199 supplemented with FSH, Estrogen, EGF, and Pyruvate. After maturation, we activated them using two types of activators i.e. Ethanol 7%, Ionomycin. After that, we saw and compared their developmental potential in vitro.


Oocytes matured in COC’s and Cumulus cell monolayer co-culture (59% ± 4*) showed significantly more even growth and extrusion of the first polar body as compared to the COC’s only culture (53.8 ± 7%*). While oocytes activated using Ionomycin showed more promising development until 8 cells/blastocyst level compared to ethanol 7%.


we concluded that COC’s and cumulus monolayer co-culture is better than COC’s only culture. Cumulus monolayer provides extra aid in the absorption of nutrients and supplements thus providing a better environment for oocytes growth. Also, we concluded that matured oocytes showed more developmental capacity after activation via ionomycin compared to ethanol.


Murine are widely used laboratory animal because of their easy to handle size and fast growth rate. Rat is preferable because of its ideal size as compared to the mouse as well as its physiological more resemblance with humans thus used for many biomedical and genetic research [1]. Rat models have an edge because of its accurate representation of human diseases thus, widely used in studies like hypertension [2], atherosclerosis [3], and Huntington disease [4], etc. Not only rat provides accurate pathological data but also rat has widely diverse Genomic data [5] which provides a promising area that still needs to be explored, understands, and research. All this provides rat disease models edge over other lab animal models.

With the advancement in genome engineering and diverse genomic data [5] of rat still pending to be explored the creation of humanized rats is one of the possible field areas yet to be studied completely. Since the development of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) [6, 7] we have seen a rapid advancement in the production of genetically modified mouse models [8, 9]. Thus, we see a diverse and vast variety of mouse models available for research to date.

But as we discussed earlier rat models have an edge over mouse models because of comparatively easy handling and more accurate physiological and pathological data representation. So, as a vacuum for transgenic rat production developed, the need to produce genetically engineered rats increased. Over the years many precise genome modification tools and methods been developed for example; Targeted endonucleases, including zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) [10], transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [11], and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system [12].

In vitro maturation may be the answer to our problems and provides us the opportunity to maximize the potential of transgenic animal production [13] but with ease comes hurdles as well. Mouse oocytes maturation protocol is well studied compared to rat counterparts. Thus, we can find research data dating back to the 1970s either in terms of in vitro maturation and meiotic progression [14], mouse oocytes development in various culture systems [15] and studies regarding oocytes development, fertilization, or embryo development [16], etc. There are many reasons for that i.e. either more popularity of mouse as a laboratory animal, ease of availability, and focus of study. But one of the reasons in vitro maturation is long ignored and researchers still rely on conventional in vivo practices in rats because the quality of IVM oocytes is lower than in vivo counterparts [17, 18]. Nuclear maturation is evident but cytoplasmic maturation doesn’t go that well [19].

To overcome these challenges many biologists tried to understand the physiology of COC’s maturation in rats and many important suggestions were advised over the past decade. Rat oocytes require special signaling from the cumulus cells, follicular somatic cells, and bidirectional communication is necessary for successful maturation [20, 21]. Thus, many scientists tried to mimic in vivo conditions and advised co-culture for the proper maturation of oocytes [22].

One of the most popular co-culture is the development of oocyte in cumulus clumps [23, 24]. Cumulus and serum played an essential role in normal cytoplasmic maturation and subsequent developmental capability of rat oocytes [25]. In these studies, we tried to further evaluate and explore in vitro maturation of rat oocyte under co-culture, tried to assess their development using parthenogenetic activation using two activation chemicals Ionomycin and 7% ethanol.


All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC. (Missouri, USA) unless otherwise specified.

Care and use of animals

SD rats used in this study were purchased by Orient-bio (Republic of Korea). All-female rats aged 3–4 weeks were maintained in 24 ± 2 °C, 50% humidity, and 12:12 h light-dark cycle, a sample size of 6.5 ± 2 are maintained. All animal care and experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (No.160719a-2-7) and performed under the guideline of Seoul National University.


All sample rats were euthanatized humanely by anesthesia (alfaxanole 10 mg /kg) accompanied by cervical dislocation under guidelines and training of Seoul National University.

COC collection

The rats were injected PMSG (150 IU/kg) and hCG (150 IU/kg) (HCG, Daesung microbiological labs, Gyenggi, Republic of Korea) Intra peritoneally 48 h and 16 h prior to dissection respectively. Rats were anesthetized using Alfaxan (Jurox inc.) 10 mg/kg body weight IM (Intramuscular). The surgical site is disinfected using Ethanol 70%, an incision was given on linea alba, ovaries were retrieved and dissected and stored in pre-warm PBS solution. Later collected ovaries were sliced using a scalpel blade in M2 media (Special rat oocytes media). The released oocytes were then collected in 4 well plates containing 500 ul M2 solution in each well. Only germinal vesicle oocytes which have 3 layers unexpended cumulus layers and balanced cytoplasm were collected. They were washed three times in M2 solution and then incubated in pre-prepared TCM 199 media for maturation.

In vitro maturation of oocytes

Oocytes were matured in TCM 199 (cat. M5017) which was supplemented with; Fetal calf serum 10% volume by volume, estrogen 1 μg/ml, EGF 10 ng/ml, Cysteamine 100uM, Sodium pyruvate 0.45 mM, FSH 5 μg/ml. 4 well plate is used as maturation container. In each well 500 ul of TCM 199 plus supplementation, media is used. Oocytes collected from ovaries were first washed 3 times in M2 media than one time in TCM 199 media. After that, they are incubated in above mentioned supplemented TCM 199 media for 20 h at 37 °C temp. The quantity of 25–40 oocytes per/well is maintained (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of in vitro Maturation protocol, starting from superovulation via PMSG and hCG 150 IU 48 and 16-h prior sample collection respectively. Ovaries are collected via surgical incision and then dissected in M2 washing media, oocytes with 3 layers of intact cumulus cells are selected. They then incubated for 20 h in Co-culture or simple culture containing culture media TCM 199 supplemented with Fetal calf serum 10% volume by volume, estrogen 1 μg/ml, EGF 10 ng/ml, Cysteamine 100uM, Sodium pyruvate 0.45 mM, FSH 5 μg/ml. Figure is created by author himself using miscrsoft power point software and own all rights to it

Cumulus mono cell layer production

Cumulus cell monolayer is developed to co-culture it with oocytes to mimic the in vivo physiological conditions. For Cumulus cell monolayer development cumulus cells after denuding of oocytes are recovered in 1 ml Eppendorf tube. Then it’s centrifuged for 100 s at 370 g, the supernatant solution was aspirated and replaced with PBS. The procedure is repeated 3 times to wash cumulus cells. Pre-warmed DMEM supplemented with 10% volume by volume Fetal calf serum is used as culture media. Cells were grown until the completion of the monolayer; the media was replaced every few days. Later this monolayer is used to co-culture freshly obtained oocytes from the ovaries.

Oocyte activation and culture

After 20 h of incubation oocytes, growth and maturation were checked. The Cumulus cell growth and extrusion of the polar body are preliminary morphological quality determinants. The TCM 199 media is aspirated using an aspirator and 0.1% hyaluronidase 500 ul is poured into each well to denude the oocytes. The plate was incubated for 3 min for successful distribution and effective denuding. The pipette is set to 50 ul and slow pipetting is done to detached cumulus cells from oocytes. After denuding oocytes were transferred to a fresh plate containing 500 ul of M2 media, then after washing twice the oocytes were then activated.

Parthenogenetic activation

For activation 2 different type of activation chemicals are used;

Ethanol 7%

Seventy ul 100% ethanol is mixed in 930 ul of M2 to make 7% Ethanol solution. Oocytes were incubated in freshly made 7% ethanol solution for 3 min and then washed in M2 solution. After that incubated in DMAP 2 mM for 4 h.


Denuded oocytes were activated in ionomycin solution for 4 min. Ionomycin is sensitive to light thus the procedure was done in a dark room with minimum microscopic light. Later to avoid light either wrap it with aluminum foil or incubate in the incubator for 4 min. Then wash activated oocytes in M2 and incubate in DMAP 2 mM for 4 h.

In vitro embryo culture

Incubated oocytes were then washed again using M2 media and transferred to 200 ul drop of KSOM media covered with an oil film, where they incubated for a further 20 h. After 20 h activated oocytes were observed and those with the second polar body or 2 cells were transferred to 100 um MR1ECM media (ARK Resource, Kumamoto, Japan). Twenty-five activated oocytes were kept per drop. Observed for further development, within 2–3 days oocytes usually reach 8 cells and blastocyst stage respectively. The procedure can be seen in the illustrated schematic diagram (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of parthenogenetic activation and procedure until embryo development (2 cells). The main phases involved denuding, activation using either Ionomycin or ethanol 7%, and development in growth media till 2 cell embryos. Figure is created by author himself using Microsoft power point software and owns all rights to it

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by independent t-test (IBM SPSS 23). Results are mentioned as the mean ± standard deviation. A probability of P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.


Oocyte maturation

Oocyte maturation was checked 20 h. post-incubation in TCM 199 media plus supplementation. The even growth of cumulus cell layers and even cytoplasm, as well as extrusion of the first polar body, were the initial markers of the development. Oocytes matured in cumulus cell monolayer co-culture showed more even growth and extrusion of the first polar body as compared to the normal culture. (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Comparison between Oocytes matured in the presence of Cumulus mono cell layer (a) vs Oocytes matured in simple culture (b).

Parthenogenetic activation

The initial development of embryos was almost similar. Almost both methods of parthenogenetic activation have shown two cell division 20 h. post-activation (Fig. 4). Ethanol 7% shown fragmentation after 8 cell stages while Ionomycin has shown proper development till BL formation. On average 116.42 ± 66.13 oocytes were activated using both methods 57% ± 0.05% Shown active cleavage after 20 h of incubation as can be seen in Fig. 5). We see a significant improvement of development post-activation in co-culture with 59% ± 4 two cell development while 23% ± 2 at the eight-cell stage as can be seen in Table 1 and Fig. 6.

Fig. 4

Activated oocytes post 20-h incubation, we can see dividing oocytes, 2 cells, and 4 cells

Fig. 5

Parthenogenetic activation summary a total of an average of 116.42 ± 66.13 oocytes were activated using both methods i.e. Ethanol 7% and Ionomycin. 57.0% ± 0.05% oocytes Shown active cleavage after 20 h of incubation

Table 1 Comparison between IVM methods Simple vs Co-culture
Fig. 6

Comparison between in vitro maturation under simple and co-culture conditions. Showing significantly better development in co-culture compared to simple culture


In this study, we tried to evaluate and develop basic guidelines for in vitro maturation protocol in rat oocytes. We tried to evaluate oocyte quality based on different markers i.e. expansion of the cumulus layer, the formation of polar bodies, cytoplasmic equilibrium (equal distribution of cytoplasm), and post parthenogenetic activation development. Our studies showed that those oocytes grown in co-culture with cumulus cell clumps showed better development than COC’s only culture. Many studies show that cytoplasmic maturation is crucial for the development of oocytes [26, 27]. One of the most important markers of cytoplasmic maturation is meiotic progression, redox state, and post-fertilization or activation development [28]. Previous studies have shown the metabolic and protective role of cumulus cells, for example, cumulus cells can reduce cystine to cysteine, enhance the uptake of cysteine cumulus cells can reduce cystine to cysteine [29], and increase the intra-oocyte glutathione level and protect the oocytes against oxidative stress [30]. Cumulus cells can also metabolize glucose to pyruvate that can be used by the oocyte to improve cytoplasmic maturation [31]. There are many ways of parthenogenetic activation and can be induced both physically as well as chemically. The key is to mimic the physiology involved during the fertilization process i.e. Conveying Ca2+ signals to the metaphase-II arrested oocytes. For that purpose, many different modes of stimuli are being studied for example, Electric stimuli are long used to induce exogenous Ca2+ into the cytoplasm of mature oocytes [32]. Also, many chemical activation agents have been studied as well like calcium ionophore, ethanol, and ionomycin they all increase intracellular Ca2+, which leads to activation of mammalian oocytes [26, 33]. Parthenogenetic activation opens a whole world of embryo development, either its SCNT, ISCI, or development of maternal genes only embryonic stem cells. It’s a field yet to be explored and exploited. Specifically, concerning rat parthenogenetic activation and embryo development is least understood as well as developed. Thus, based on previous studies we tried to develop an IVM co-culture protocol that may provide a key for the future development of transgenic rats in the in vitro environment and tried to access their developmental potential based on parthenogenetic activation, our studies can act as basic model to further study rat oocytes IVM and their developmental potential.


Our studies have shown that a co-culture is the best protocol for IVM and ionomycin shows promising results in the activation of IVM oocytes. As demand for transgenic rats is increasing rapidly in vitro maturation in rats can answer to the humane and ethical production of transgenic rat models. Also, Parthenogenetic Activation of in vitro matured oocytes can help us develop ESC ethically as it doesn’t involve the manipulation of a fertilized embryo. In short, IVM is a broad useful area that still needs to be studied, explored, utilized, and conquered.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Assisted reproduction technology


Cumulus-oocyte complex


Dimethyl sulfoxide


Deoxyribonucleic acid


Equine chorionic gonadotropin


Embryonic stem cell


Follicle-stimulating hormone




Human chorionic gonadotropin


Intraperitoneal injection


Intravenous injection


Nota bene (Note well)


Ribonucleic acid


Somatic cell nuclear transfer


Sprague Dawley


  1. 1.

    Doorschodt BM, Teubner A, Kobayashi E, Tolba RH. Promising future for the transgenic rat in transplantation research. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2014;28(4):155–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mullins JJ, Peters J, Ganten D. Fulminant hypertension in transgenic rats harbouring the mouse Ren-2 gene. Nature. 1990;344(6266):541–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Herrera VL, Makrides SC, Xie HX, Adari H, Krauss RM, Ryan US, Ruiz-Opazo N. Spontaneous combined hyperlipidemia, coronary heart disease and decreased survival in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats transgenic for human cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Nat Med. 1999;5(12):1383–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Carreira JC, Jahanshahi A, Zeef D, Kocabicak E, Vlamings R, von Horsten S, Temel Y. Transgenic rat models of Huntington's disease. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2015;22:135–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Filipiak WE, Hughes ED, Gavrilina GB, LaForest AK, Saunders TL: Next generation transgenic rat model production. Methods Mol Biol 2019, 2018:97–114.

  6. 6.

    Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292(5819):154–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(12):7634–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Charreau B, Tesson L, Soulillou JP, Pourcel C, Anegon I. Transgenesis in rats: technical aspects and models. Transgenic Res. 1996;5(4):223–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mullins LJ, Wilmut I, Mullins JJ. Nuclear transfer in rodents. J Physiol. 2004;554(Pt 1):4–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carroll D, Beumer KJ, Morton JJ, Bozas A, Trautman JK. Gene targeting in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans with zinc-finger nucleases. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;435:63–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Qiu Z, Liu M, Chen Z, Shao Y, Pan H, Wei G, Yu C, Zhang L, Li X, Wang P, et al. High-efficiency and heritable gene targeting in mouse by transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(11):e120.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li D, Qiu Z, Shao Y, Chen Y, Guan Y, Liu M, Li Y, Gao N, Wang L, Lu X, et al. Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(8):681–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yuan Y, Spate LD, Redel BK, Tian Y, Zhou J, Prather RS, Roberts RM. Quadrupling efficiency in production of genetically modified pigs through improved oocyte maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(29):E5796–804.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Erickson GF, Sorensen RA. In vitro maturation of mouse oocytes isolated from late, middle, and pre-antral graafian follicles. J Exp Zool. 1974;190(1):123–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Eppig JJ. Mouse oocyte development in vitro with various culture systems. Dev Biol. 1977;60(2):371–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC. Ovary and ovulation: in-vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development of immature oocytes from early preantral follicles from prepuberal mice in a simplified culture system. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(12):2656–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sirard MA, Blondin P. Oocyte maturation and IVF in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 1996;42(1):417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Trounson A, Anderiesz C, Jones GM, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C: Oocyte maturation. Hum Reprod 1998, 13 Suppl 3:52–62; discussion 71-55.

  19. 19.

    Sun QY, Wu GM, Lai L, Park KW, Cabot R, Cheong HT, Day BN, Prather RS, Schatten H. Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro. Reproduction. 2001;122(1):155–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eppig JJ. Oocyte control of ovarian follicular development and function in mammals. Reproduction. 2001;122(6):829–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    van den Hurk R, Zhao J. Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology. 2005;63(6):1717–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gil MA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Martinez EA. Advances in swine in vitro embryo production technologies. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(Suppl 2):40–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhou CJ, Wu SN, Shen JP, Wang DH, Kong XW, Lu A, Li YJ, Zhou HX, Zhao YF, Liang CG. The beneficial effects of cumulus cells and oocyte-cumulus cell gap junctions depends on oocyte maturation and fertilization methods in mice. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Feng G, Shi D, Yang S, Wang X. Co-culture embedded in cumulus clumps promotes maturation of denuded oocytes and reconstructs gap junctions between oocytes and cumulus cells. Zygote. 2013;21(3):231–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vanderhyden BC, Armstrong DT. Role of cumulus cells and serum on the in vitro maturation, fertilization, and subsequent development of rat Oocytes1. Biol Reprod. 1989;40(4):720–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fulka J Jr, First NL, Moor RM. Nuclear and cytoplasmic determinants involved in the regulation of mammalian oocyte maturation. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(1):41–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Watson AJ. Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: a key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(13 Suppl):E1–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jiao GZ, Cao XY, Cui W, Lian HY, Miao YL, Wu XF, Han D, Tan JH. Developmental potential of prepubertal mouse oocytes is compromised due mainly to their impaired synthesis of glutathione. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58018.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Takahashi M, Nagai T, Hamano S, Kuwayama M, Okamura N, Okano A. Effect of thiol compounds on in vitro development and intracellular glutathione content of bovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 1993;49(2):228–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tatemoto H, Sakurai N, Muto N. Protection of porcine oocytes against apoptotic cell death caused by oxidative stress during in vitro maturation: role of cumulus cells. Biol Reprod. 2000;63(3):805–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Downs SM, Utecht AM. Metabolism of radiolabeled glucose by mouse oocytes and oocyte-cumulus cell complexes. Biol Reprod. 1999;60(6):1446–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yi YJ, Park CS. Parthenogenetic development of porcine oocytes treated by ethanol, cycloheximide, cytochalasin B and 6-dimethylaminopurine. Anim Reprod Sci. 2005;86(3):297–304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wani NA. Chemical activation of in vitro matured dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) oocytes: optimization of protocols. Theriogenology. 2008;69(5):591–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The funding bodies were not involved in the experimental design and data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data in this study, nor the writing of the manuscript. We also thank the members of the G. Jang lab for their valuable comments.


This study was supported financially by the Research Institute of Veterinary Science, the Creative Veterinary Graduate program of the Brain Korea 21 Program for Leading Universities & Students (BK21 PLUS), MSS (Technology Development Program, #S2566872) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B3004972).

Author information




Muhammad J. A carried out the main experiments i.e. Superovulation, Collection of oocytes, in vitro maturation, parthenogenetic activation, and data collection. Y. K Jin, H. K Kim helped in the collection of samples i.e. rats maintenance, hormones injections, surgical assistance, and euthanasia. G. Jang attended and supervised all procedures, participated in the design of the study, drafted the manuscript, and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goo Jang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal care and experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (No.160719a-2-7) and performed under the guideline of Seoul National University.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ailia, M.J., Jin, YK., Kim, HK. et al. Development of in-vitro maturation protocol for rat oocytes; under simple culture vs co-culture with cumulus cell monolayer and its developmental potential via Parthenogenetic/artificial activation. BMC Vet Res 17, 44 (2021).

Download citation


  • SD rats
  • Ovaries
  • Superovulation
  • Oocytes
  • In vitro maturation
  • Parthenogenesis