Skip to main content

Peste des petits ruminants pathogenesis on experimental infected goats by the Moroccan 2015 isolate



Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a viral disease of major economic importance on small ruminants. Goats are usually known to be more susceptible to the disease. Infection chronology, virus circulation, and the disease early detection need to be better understood. This study evaluates the tissue tropism and pathogenesis of PPR following experimental infection of goats using a lineage IV virus, the most dominant in the world originated from Asia. PPRV infection was experimentally induced in 4 six-month-old goats by intra-nasal and intravenous route of cell virus suspension and from infectious mashed tissue. The clinical signs were observed and goats were euthanized at predetermined clinical score level for post-mortem examinations and PPRV detection by RT-PCR. Clinical signs of infection were present, pyrexia, serous-mucopurulent nasal discharges, coughing, diarrhea and asthenia, for both cell virus suspension and infectious mashed tissue. PPRV genome was highly detected in swabs and tissues with clinical signs dominated by pulmonary attack and digestive symptoms secondary.


Results of this study indicates that PPRV is an invasive infection in animals that in a short period, less than 10 days, invade all vital organs. On live animals, early diagnostic may be easily done on lacrimal and rectal swabs.


The experimental PPRV-infection model using the cell virus suspension is suitable for vaccine evaluation as a standard model.


Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) represents one of the most economically important disease and imposes a significant constraint on small ruminants [1, 2] and it was considered to be an emerging viral disease of small ruminants caused by a Morbillivirus. PPR is widespread in Africa, Middle East and Southern Asia [3,4,5].

The PPRV contaminates animals through their oral and nasal passages. After entering into the organism, the initial virus replication occurs within the nasopharyngeal/respiratory epithelium [6, 7], prior to infection of regional lymphoid organs, where a second round of replication occurs [8, 9] and these disseminated the infection to distant organs. The morbilliviruses display a strong tropism for lymphoid tissues and during infection destruction of leucocytes often causes a profound immunosuppression [10].

PPR virus (PPRV) causes severe clinical signs in its acute form and signs severity depends on the species, age, strain virulence and secondary infectious agents [11,12,13,14]. Including fever, respiratory signs, inappetence, marked depression, erosive stomatitis, catarrhal inflammation of ocular and nasal mucous, profuse diarrhea which may be watery, fetid and blood-stained, very often end-stage bronchopneumonia due to bacterial complications related to immunosuppression.

PPR virus is present in all kind of secretions. Animal excretions starting from 3 to 22 days post infection [15,16,17]. PPRV is usually transmitted via direct contact with infected animals, or through their fresh secretions or feces. Goats are considered more susceptible than sheep and occasionally wild small ruminants [18,19,20,21,22].

The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) have set up a global eradication program based on epidemiological surveillance, early case finding and comprehensive vaccination campaigns.

In fact, deep knowledge of PPR disease and their clinical sign in target species it’s a fundamental basis of effective surveillance.

The current understanding of PPRV pathology has been assumed from the closely related rinderpest virus and other morbillivirus infections [23]. Very few studies focused on the pathology of PPRV has been performed and little is known about the mechanisms underlying establishment of the disease, pathogenesis, in susceptible animals.

In this study, experimental infection in two groups of goats with PPR MOR15, belonging to lineage IV, isolated locally in 2015 was performed and the resulting pathogenesis was evaluated using real time RT-PCR [24]. Moreover, we have followed disease signs and virus secretion, lesions and viral load in different tissues using a quantitative time-course study. We evaluate the pathogenesis of PPR genotype IV virus after infection of two groups of goats with viral load detection in secretions and tissues, compared to two uninfected goats. The aim of this study is to understand infection chronology, virus circulation, and contribute to the disease early detection.



Goats were allowed to acclimate to the laboratory environment for a quarantine period prior to experimental infection with PPRV. During that time, all experimental animals were healthy. First group of two goats 1 and 2 injected with viral suspension developed hyperthermia for 7 days, a peak was noticed at 7-day post infection at 40.7 °C with 3 and 5 days up to 40 °C (Fig. 1). The two goats 3 and 4 of group II (tissue virus) developed hyperthermia for 8 days, a peak at D4 at 40.9 °C; 7 and 6 days up to 40 °C for each goat. Goats of both groups showed a long hyperthermia period (above 39 °C) during 6 to 9 days. Group II presented an earlier hyperthermia and higher temperature values than group I (Fig. 1). The body temperature of two goats of group III 5 and 6 used as unvaccinated controls, remained normal and do not exceed 39,4 °C. Hyperthermia duration criteria was calculated by number of day > 39 °C.

Fig. 1

Rectal temperatures of goats following PPRV infection. Rectal temperatures were measured 3 days prior to experimental infection with PPRV (MOR15), and following infection every day until 9 dpi. Results presented are average temperature of four goats infected with cell virus suspension and infectious mashed tissue

Clinical scoring

Following inoculation with PPRV, four goats of the two groups showed typical PPR signs from 4 dpi, i.e. nasal and lacrimal discharges, coughing and dyspnea (Fig. 2). The two goats 1 and 2 of group I were euthanized at D9 and D10, presenting respectively a clinical score of 13 and 15. Both presented lacrimal, mucopurulent nasal discharges, coughing, diarrhea and asthenia. One goat presented a mild dyspnea and alimentation decrease in the last days. One goat of group II died at D9 with a clinical score of 14. The second goat was euthanized at D7 with a clinical score of 17. Both presented lacrimal, mucopurulent nasal discharges, dyspnea, coughing, diarrhea and asthenia. One goat presented an important dyspnea, depressive comportment and alimentation decrease in the last days (Table 1). The two goats of control group remained in healthy condition without any clinical sign and were euthanized at D10.

Fig. 2

signs and lesions observed on goats. Nasal discharge (a), hypertrophy of mesenteric nodes (b) and lung congestion (c) observed on Peste des Petits Ruminants infected goat

Table 1 Results of PPR experimental infection on goats according five severity criteria

Viral excretion, viraemia and antibody detection

For both groups I and II lacrimal PPRV genome excretion was detected with similar value from D3, nasal PPRV genome excretion from D6, rectal PPRV genome excretion at D6. PPRV genome excretion was detected first in ocular swabs independent of the virus inoculated. Highest PPRV genome excretion value was obtained in rectal swabs followed by nasal swabs and lacrimal swabs. Viraemia began for group I at D6 with 40.4 Ct value respectively, for group II at D3 with 35.2 Ct value. Viraemia was higher and detected earlier in group II (Table 2). PPRV genome was not detected by PCR for all samples collected swabs and viremia of two goats of group III.

Table 2 individual Ct values per animal

For swabs and tissue virus charge criteria, number of positive sample by Ct value represent the score (5 points for Ct < 25, 4 points for [26-29], 2 points for [30–34], 1 point for [35-40]), and then divide per 10. The obtained swabs virus charge score for group I and II was respectively 1.8 and 2.1 (Table 1).

Consistent results were obtained for serological testing by VNT and bELISA. Both goats of group I had a 1.5 log10 value of antibody neutralizing titer at 9 dpi by VNT. The first detection of antibody seroconversion were detected from 6 dpi for one animal of group II with a 1.02 log10 value of antibody neutralizing titer by VNT. The second animal of group II died at D9 before we could take a sample for analysis. Animals evaluated positive by VNT were confirmed by bELISA. Goats of unvaccinated group remain seronegative for both VNT and bELISA.

Post mortem lesion and viral detection in tissue

Prior to euthanasia, animals were anesthetized by intravenous administration of xylazine (Rompun 2%, Bayer) and intramuscular administration of ketamine (Imalgene 1000, Merial). Animals were partially exsanguinated by jugular catheterization.

At necropsy goats 3 and 4 of group II presented lesions of respiratory tract. The lungs were red with area firm to touch, mainly in the anterior and cardiac lobes (Fig. 2), trachea was congested and mesenteric and pulmonary nodes were enlarged and hypertrophied. Goat 3 presented inflammation of the pharynx with bacterial complication and petechial leaflet in lung. in the digestive tract he intestinal mucosa of the small intestine were moderately congested. For goats 1 and 2 of group I we observed congestion and hepatization lung, hypertrophy of mesenteric and pulmonary nodes, and one goat presented mild inflammation of intestine (Fig. 2). No lesions were observed at necropsy of two goats of unvaccinated group.

In both groups I and II, lung is the tissue with the higher viral detected charge (Ct value of 22.6 for group II and 27.1 for group I), followed by mesenteric, sub-maxillary and pulmonary nodes and abomasum with respectively average Ct values of 26.1, 27.8, 27.8, 28.0. In the spleen, intestine, liver, kidney and heart virus charge Ct values were 30.3, 31.2, 32.6, 35.6 and 37.4 respectively. The obtained tissue virus charge score for group I and II was respectively 2.5 and 3.2 (Table 1). Ct values in the organs of the two controls goats were negative.

For mortality criteria, the first to die at D7 had 3 points, the last one at D10, the two others had 2 point as they died at D9, Group II presented a higher mortality score (2.5) comparatively with group I (1.5) (Table 1).

Regarding the five selected criteria, goats 3 and 4 of group II presented a higher severity score (102.2) comparatively with of group I (86.8) (Table 1).


In spite of the importance of PPR as the priority disease for eradication, very few studies have been dedicated to describe infection kinetic in the animal body [20, 25,26,27,28]. The pathogenesis of PPR is still poorly understood and PPRV strains have different pathogenic profiles [15, 19]. it’s then important to properly understand the pathogenesis of the disease of different strains.

In our study, we demonstrated that experimental infection could reproduce typical PPR signs in young susceptible goats using a virulent strain, administered by the natural route of infection IN route associated with IV route.

Age and species are the key factor to succeed a PPR experimental infection. As described by several authors, susceptibility to the virus decrease rapidly with age. Adult animals can carry the virus with mild or no signs, which represent a constraint for diagnostic and surveillance. It is also known that goats are more sensitive than sheep especially for North African breed as described by many authors [19, 29, 30]. Alpine goats were used for a challenge model by Elharrak et al. (2012) with great success. However, in this study local goat breed showed similar sensitivity to PPRV as Alpine goats and could be used for challenge model.

We selected a virulent strain recently isolated in Morocco and tested on susceptible Alpine goats which showed a high clinical score with mortality [24]. It is a genotype IV virus, the most dominant in the world originated from Asia. We confirm in our study the high virulence of the used 2015 Morocco strain (mortality up to D10) comparatively to the 2008 Morocco strain for which mortality occurs later (up to D33) [31]. West African dwarf goats inoculated by culture of PPRV belonging to lineage I died from D28, with clinical signs of pyrexia, serous-mucopurulent nasal discharges with copious ocular discharge, sneezing and coughing, while oral erosions, profuse diarrhoea after the first 15 dpi [29]. In comparison with other strains from lineages II and IV, oral lesions were seen at 5–9 dpi, diarrhoea at 8–10 dpi and death 7–12 dpi [19]. 86% of hill goats (13 of 15) experimentally infected with a virulent Indian isolate (PPR/Izatnagar/94) died between 9 and 13 days pi [25].

Used route of infection is the most appropriate since IN spray reproduce the natural infection conditions and the IV injection allow to secure a minimal quantity of the virus administered.

To appreciate the severity of the infection we considered the five criteria listed in the results chapter. The early mortality observed in all animals was associated with a high clinical score. Similar signs has been also observed by several authors confirming that PPR is dominated by pulmonary signs [20, 31, 32]. With our strain we did not observed any lesions at buccal mucosa.

PCR analysis of collected swabs suggest that animals became contagious from D3 through lacrimal secretion then nasal secretion and faeces from D6. Rectal swabs are the most indicated for diagnostic and epidemio-surveillance with the highest Ct value detected. Nasal and lacrimal secretion represent the first and the direct way of virus transmission.

Increasing body temperature was reported in group I at D5 pi with a maximum at D7pi while in group II hyperthermia started at D2 at to D7 pi. The temperature reached 40.5 °C at D7 and D4 for group I and 2 respectively. Despite the hyperthermia, very low viraemia is detected by PCR.

In the study, characteristics lesions of PPR disease were obtained in post mortem tissues. Lung is the tissue with the highest viral detected charge (Ct 22.6 for Group II and 27.1 for Group I). followed by mesenteric, sub-maxillary and pulmonary nodes and abomasum (with average Ct value of 27.5). Lower Ct were obtained in the spleen, intestine, liver, kidney and heart (30.3, 31.2, 32.6, 35.6 and 37.4 respectively). Lung is the preferred source of virus among all other tissues for virus detection and isolation.

Signs, lesions, mortality and viral charge are clearly expressed in group II (infected with tissue mixture) comparatively to group I (infected by cell suspension). This difference can be attributed to the virus titre even if it can not be determined for the group 2, while with cell culture the used titre (6.5 log TCID50/ml) seems to be enough to reproduce a typical disease. Cell culture is always preferable to tissue because of purity concern and known titre. However. in our study, the use of infected tissue is much more efficient than the cell culture suspension virus probably because of virus adaptation on cells.


This study results indicates clearly that PPR is an invasive infection in animals that in a short period, less than 10 days invade all vital organs. Transmission to naïve animals may starts 2 days after infection and last for certainly more than 2 weeks as in this study animals died quickly. Swabs and tissues showed high charge of the virus and clinical signs dominated by pulmonary attack and digestive symptoms secondary. On live animals early diagnostic may be easily done on lacrimal swabs, rectal swabs show the lowest Ct. Virus isolation could be done on swabs or lung tissue. Antibody seroconversion could be detected beginning from 6 dpi.

The vaccine efficacy test on animals consist of vaccination, followed by experimental infection of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals by using virulent strain of PPRV. The vaccinated animals should be completely protected after the experimental infection and unvaccinated animals must show typical signs of PPR. The obtained results demonstrate that the 2015 Morocco isolate, genotype IV, is highly virulent and could be used in challenge to test vaccine efficacy under specified conditions.



Infection was carried out according to international guidelines described for the care and handling of experimental animals, chapter 7.8 of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code and Directive 2010/63/UE of the European commission [32, 33]. The protocol was submitted and approved by the internal Laboratory Committee.

Six local breed goats, males, aged 6 to 9 months, of around 30 Kg, are arranged to three groups of 2 goats each. Animals were randomly chosen from MCI Santé Animale breeding farm located at Sidi Yahya Zaer in North-West region of Morocco Animals. Goats were fed a complete balanced diet and water ad libitum and housed in animal boxes (Biosecurity level 3 containment) at MCI Santé Animale.

Animals were maintained 2 weeks under observations before starting the following experiments. Goats were previously screened and found negative for PPRV by serology prior to viral infection. Animals were tested negative for PPRV specific antibody by ELISA using the blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) and virus neutralization test (VNT).

Group I (goats 1 and 2) was infected by cell virus suspension and group II (goats 3 and 4) by infectious mashed tissue (lung and mesenteric node), both from the same isolate. Group III (goats 5 and 6) was inoculated by placebo solution and this group was in a separated room from the other groups.

Virus strain

The PPR Moroccan virulent strain MOR15 strain used for the experiment was isolated at MCI Santé Animale laboratories, during the 2015 outbreak in Morocco from a lamb showing characteristic clinical signs of PPR and it belonging to lineage IV [24].

The cell virus suspension had a titer of 6.2 logTCID50/ml. The viral stock was passaged 8 times in Vero (African green monkey kidney cells, ATCC No.CCL-81). Infected cells and supernatant were harvested and frozen at − 80 °C for subsequent experiments. Virus titration was performed using the method described in the OIE Terrestrial Manual (Chapter 2.7.11).

The infectious mashed tissue was prepared from lung and mesenteric node presenting a Ct of 20.2 in qPCR.

Experimental infection, animal sampling and monitoring

The experiment infection was carried out according to the protocol described by El Harrak et al. (2012) [34]. Each goat of the two inoculated groups was infected by two different routes of inoculation, 1 ml via intravenous (IV) route and 1 ml via intra-nasal (IN) spray.

All animals were observed daily, with rectal temperature, clinical signs and clinical scoring recorded throughout the study. The rectal temperature was recorded for each animal of each group during the quarantine period by repeated measurements. If a rectal temperature exceeds above 39 °C, we defined Hyperthermia.

A clinical scoring was applied with notation system from 0 to 4 based on the gravity of different clinical symptoms observed on goats during the experiment: general clinical appearance, hyperthermia, alimentation, behavior, diarrhea, nasal discharge, salivation, respiratory signs including dyspnoea, coughing and sneezing. These signs were scored as described in Table 3. Lacrimal, nasal and rectal swabs, as well as blood samples were collected from goats every 3 days post infection (dpi) and analysed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to monitor viral load.

Table 3 Scoring of recorded clinical signs

If severe clinical symptoms were observed and the cumulative clinical score arrived at a value between 15 and 18, goats were euthanized by overdose anesthesia through intravenous xylazine and intramuscular ketamine injections followed by exsanguination [34, 35].

Post mortem samples were collected from the lungs, abomasum, liver, spleen, heart, kidney, intestine, mesenteric, sub-maxillary and pulmonary lymph nodes.

For each individual goat, a severity score was calculated. We listed five criteria by significance: 1) Mortality, 2); Clinical scoring; 3) Viral load in post mortem tissue; 4) Hyperthermia duration; 5) Viral load in swabs (number of positive and cycle threshold (Ct) values). Each criteria has a coefficient of significance (5 point for criteria 1, 4 point for criteria 2, 3 point for criteria 3, 2 point for criteria 4 and 1 point for criteria 5). The severity score is a cumulative value of each criteria score, previously multiplied by the coefficient of significance.

Sample treatment

All biological samples were transported to the laboratory on ice and analyzed by PCR for viral genome detection. Swabs were collected in 2 ml PBS supplemented and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. Tissues were homogenized and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was kept and used for analysis. The blood samples were directly used for RNA extraction.

Samples analysis

Animals were tested negative for PPRV specific antibody by virus neutralization test (VNT) and ELISA using the blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA). Serological testing was carried out every 3 days.

VNT test was done as described in the OIE Terrestrial Manual [13]. The test was based on serial 1:3 dilutions of heat inactivated sera, mixed with a constant dose of PPR virus (100 TCID50), incubated for 1 h, and then inoculated onto Vero cells to be observed for neutralization of cytopathic effect (CPE) after 7 days of the incubation period at 37 °C with 5% of CO2. The neutralizing antibody titer was calculated in accordance with Reed and Muench method.

bELISA was developed, tested and validated by the Pan African Veterinary Vaccine Centre of the African Union (AU-PANVAC) [36]. Sera samples from goats were tested at a 1:100 dilution for PPRV antibody by an ELISA using PANVAC PPR-Ab check bELISA purchased from AU-PANVAC. Briefly, 25 μl of sera samples were added to 96 and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing the wells of the plates with PBS, 100 μl of an Monoclonal antibody C4F3 & conjugate anti-mouse was added to fix the remaining free epitopes. After 45 min of incubation 37 °C, 100 μl of 3,30,5,50-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution were added to each well. The reaction was stopped after 15 min at room temperature by the addition of 100 μl of 0.16 M sulfuric acid, and then the reactivity results were read at 450 nm. Antibody positive and negative cut-off values were calculated as recommended by manufacturer with the sera being negative, if a percentage of inhibition was < 30%, and positive if a percentage of inhibition was > 30%.

All the samples were screened for viral genome detection by qRT-PCR. RNA extraction was carried out using an RNA extraction kit (Bioline BIO-52075, isolate II RNA Mini kit). Real time RT-PCR amplification and detection was performed using a Applied Biosystem 7500 real time PCR system with the SensiFast Probe Lo Rox one step kit (Bioline). Viral genome detection was performed using primer and probe described by Batten [37]. specific for nucleocapsid (N) gene. Briefly, each 25 μl reaction contained 4 μl extracted RNA; 12.5 μl of 2x SensiFAST Probe Lo-ROX One-Step Mix; 0.5 μl probe (10 μM); 1 μl (10 μM) forward and reverse primer and 6 μl nuclease free water. The cycling conditions were as follows: Reverse transcription 45 °C for 10 min; reverse transcription inactivation and DNA polymerase activation 95 °C for 2 min; followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 20 s).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Biosafety level 3


Cycle Threshold


Day post infection


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Food and Agriculture Organization






World Organization for Animal Health


Peste des petits ruminants virus


Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction


Virus neutralization test


  1. 1.

    Baron MD, Diop B, Njeumi F, Willett BJ, Bailey D. Future research to underpin successful peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) eradication. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:2635–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jones BA, Rich KM, Mariner JC, Anderson J, Jeggo M, Thevasagayam S, et al. The economic impact of eradicating peste des petits ruminants: a benefit-cost analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Albina E, Kwiatek O, Minet C, Lancelot R, Servan de Almeida R, Libeau G. Peste des petits ruminants, the next eradicated animal disease? Vet Microbiol. 2013;165:38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Buczkowski H, Muniraju M, Parida S, Banyard AC. Morbillivirus vaccines: recent successes and future hopes. Vaccine. 2014;32:3155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Parida S, Muniraju M, Altan E, Baazizi R, Raj GD, Mahapatra M. Emergence of PPR and its threat to Europe. Small Rumin Res. 2016;142:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yanagi Y, Takeda M, Ohno S. Measles virus: cellular receptors, tropism and pathogenesis. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2767–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mc chesney MB, Miller CJ, Rota PA, Zhu Y, Antipa L, Lerche NW, et al. Experimental Measles. I. Pathogenesis in the normal and the immunized host. Virology. 1997;84:74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Esolen L, Ward B, Moench T, Griffin D. Infection of monocytes during measles. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:47–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Osunkoya B, Ukaejiofo E, Ajayi O, Akinyemi A. Evidence that circulating lymphocytes act as vehicles or viraemia in measles. West Afr J Med. 1990;9:35–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rajak KK, Sreenivasa BP, Hosamani M, Singh RP, Singh SK, Singh RK, et al. Experimental studies on immunosuppressive effects of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus in goats. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;28:287–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zahur AB, Ullah A, Irshad H, Farooq MS, Hussain M, Jahangir M. Epidemiological investigations of a Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) outbreak in afghan sheep in Pakistan. Pakistan Vet J. 2009;29:174–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kivaria FM, Kwiatek O, Kapaga AM, Swai ES, Libeau G, Moshy W, et al. The incursion, persistence and spread of peste des petits ruminants in Tanzania: epidemiological patterns and predictions. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2013;80:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    OIE. Peste des petits ruminants. In: OIE Terrestrial Manual; 2013. p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chowdhury EH, Bhuiyan AR, Rahman MM, Siddique MSA, Islam MR. Natural peste des petits ruminants virus infection in black Bengal goats: Virological, pathological and immunohistochemical investigation. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Couacy-Hymann E, Bodjo SC, Danho T, Koffi MY, Libeau G, Diallo A. Early detection of viral excretion from experimentally infected goats with peste-des-petits ruminants virus. Prev Vet Med. 2007;78:85–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Munir M. Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus. UK: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Parida S, Muniraju M, Mahapatra M, Muthuchelvan D, Buczkowski H, Banyard AC. Peste des petits ruminants. Vet Microbiol. 2015;181:90–106.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nanda Y, Chatterjee A, Purohit A, Diallo A, Innui K, Sharma R, et al. The isolation of peste des petits ruminants virus from northern India. Vet Microbiol. 1996;51:207–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Couacy-Hymann E, Bodjo C, Danho T, Libeau G, Diallo A. Evaluation of the virulence of some strains of peste-des-petits-ruminants virus (PPRV) in experimentally infected West African dwarf goats. Vet J. 2007;173:178–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Truong T, Boshra H, Embury-Hyatt C, Nfon C, Gerdts V, Tikoo S, et al. Peste des petits ruminants virus tissue tropism and pathogenesis in sheep and goats following experimental infection. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Singh RP, Saravanan P, Sreenivasa BP, Singh RK, Bandyopadhyay SK. Prevalence and distribution of peste des petits ruminants virus infection in small ruminants in India. Rev Sci Tech l’OIE. 2004;23:807–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Balamurugan V, Saravanan P, Sen A, Rajak KK, Venkatesan G, Krishnamoorthy P, et al. Prevalence of peste des petits ruminants among sheep and goats in India. J Vet Sci. 2012;13:279–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wohlsein P, Saliki J. Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants - the diseases: clinical signs and pathology. In: Rinderpest and Peste des Petits ruminants. Eds Barret. London, Burlington, San Diego: Academic Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fakri F, Embarki T, Parida S, Bamouh Z, Jazouli M, Mahapatra M, et al. Re-emergence of Peste des Petits ruminants virus in 2015 in Morocco: molecular characterization and experimental infection in Alpine goats. Vet Microbiol. 2016;197:137–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kumar P, Tripathi BN, Sharma AK, Kumar R, Sreenivasa BP, Singh RP, et al. Pathological and Immunohistochemical study of experimental Peste des Petits ruminants virus infection in goats. J Vet Med Ser B. 2004;51:153–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pope RA, Parida S, Bailey D, Brownlie J, Barrett T, Banyard AC. Early events following experimental infection with Peste-des-Petits ruminants virus suggest immune cell targeting. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55830.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Aruni AW, Lalitha PS, Mohan AC, Chitravelu P, Anbumani SP. Histopathological study of a natural outbreak of Peste des petits ruminants in goats of Tamilnadu. Small Rumin Res. 1998;28:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bundza A, Afshar A, Dukes TW, Myers DJ, Dulac GC, Becker SA. Experimental peste des petits ruminants (goat plague) in goats and sheep. Can J Vet Res. 1988;52:46–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Emikpe BO, Akpavie SO. Clinicopathologic effects of Peste des petit ruminant virus infection in west African dwarf goats. Small Rumin Res. 2011;95:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wernike K, Eschbaumer M, Breithaupt A, Maltzan J, Wiesner H, Beer M, et al. Experimental infection of sheep and goats with a recent isolate of peste des petits ruminants virus from Kurdistan. Vet Microbiol. 2014;172:140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fakri FZ, Elhajjam A, Bamouh Z, Jazouli M, Boumart Z, Tadlaoui K, et al. Susceptibility of Moroccan sheep and goat breeds to peste des petits ruminants virus. Acta Vet Scand. 2017;59:1–6.

  32. 32.

    Directives EU Commission. Protection des animaux utilisés à des fins scientifiques. J Off l’Union Eur. 2010;276:1–162.

  33. 33.

    OIE. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Use of Animals In Research And Education. In: Chapter 7.8, OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code; 2016. p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    El Harrak M, Touil N, Loutfi C, Hammouchi M, Parida S, Sebbar G, et al. A reliable and reproducible experimental challenge model for peste des petits ruminants virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3738–40.

  35. 35.

    Hammouchi M, Loutfi C, Sebbar G, Touil N, Chaffai N, Batten C, et al. Experimental infection of alpine goats with a Moroccan strain of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV). Vet Microbiol. 2012;160:240–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bodjo SC, Baziki J-D, Nwankpa N, Chitsungo E, Koffi YM, Couacy-Hymann E, et al. Development and validation of an epitope-blocking ELISA using an anti-haemagglutinin monoclonal antibody for specific detection of antibodies in sheep and goat sera directed against peste des petits ruminants virus. Arch Virol. 2018;163:1745–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Batten CA, Banyard AC, King DP, Henstock MR, Edwards L, Sanders A, et al. A real time RT-PCR assay for the specific detection of Peste des petits ruminants virus. J Virol Methods. 2011;171:401–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


All the authors have seen and approved the content and have contributed significantly to the work. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this study by MCI (Multi-Chemical Industry) Santé animale.


No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information




ZBa and FzF performed the experiment, data analysis and drafted the manuscript. FzF performed serology testing. MJ carried out PCR testing. KT participated in the design and the follow up of the study. NS data analysis and critical review of the manuscript. ME participated in the design of the study, data analysis, interpretations and manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Bamouh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the international guidelines for care and handling of experimental animals. The study protocol was submitted and approved by the Internal Ethic Committee “Internal ethic committee for animal experiment, MCI santé animale”. Internal ethical commitee of MCI analyzed and approved the protocol before starting the trial. The consent was obtained from MCI Santé Animale breeding farm to use the animals in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bamouh, Z., Fakri, F., Jazouli, M. et al. Peste des petits ruminants pathogenesis on experimental infected goats by the Moroccan 2015 isolate. BMC Vet Res 15, 452 (2019).

Download citation


  • PPR virus
  • Lineage IV
  • Experimental infection
  • Tissue tropism
  • Pathogenesis
  • Goats