Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Mycoplama synoviae, and infectious bronchitis virus in poultry in Myanmar

BMC Veterinary Research volume 15, Article number: 261 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Southeast Asian countries, including Myanmar, poultry farming is a major industry. In order to manage and maintain stable productivity, it is important to establish policies for biosecurity. Infectious respiratory diseases are a major threat to poultry farming. Avian influenza and Newcastle disease have been reported in Myanmar, but no scientific information is available for other respiratory pathogens, such as mycoplasmas and infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). Identifying the genotypes and serotypes of IBVs is especially important to inform vaccination programs. In this study, we detected Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), M. synoviae (MS), and IBV in several poultry farms in Myanmar.

Results

Samples were collected from 20 farms in three major poultry farming areas in Myanmar, and MG, MS, and IBV were detected on two, four, and eight farms, respectively, by polymerase chain reaction. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the observed MG and MS isolates were not identical to vaccine strains. Three different genotypes of IBV were detected, but none was an unknown variant.

Conclusions

Mycoplasmas and IBV were detected on poultry farms in Myanmar. Periodic surveillance is required to establish the distribution of each pathogen, and to institute better vaccine protocols.

Background

Myanmar lies in the western region of mainland Southeast Asia. Agriculture is the backbone of the Myanmar economy, and poultry farming is one of the country’s major industries. In association with the recent economic development of Myanmar, the total number of raised chickens has increased over the last decade [1]. In order to provide a stable supply of poultry products, the development of farm biosecurity measures is required, and it is important that farmers and veterinarians are aware of these measures. Infectious respiratory diseases have severe impacts on the poultry industry. Avian influenza and Newcastle disease are major threats to the poultry industry, and these diseases have been reported in Myanmar [2,3,4]. Other respiratory pathogens, such as mycoplasmas and infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), have not been investigated in Myanmar, although clinical signs suggesting contagious respiratory diseases have been detected, according to local veterinarians’ observations. These diseases cause considerable economic losses worldwide, and vaccines for their prevention have been developed. It is important to determine the genotypes and/or serotypes of each pathogen circulating in Myanmar to inform vaccination programs.

Avian mycoplasmosis is caused by several pathogenic mycoplasmas. Among them, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and M. synoviae (MS) are the most impactful to the poultry industry. MG infections usually cause chronic respiratory disorders and are characterized by sneezing, coughing, and snicks as well as nasal and ocular discharges [5, 6]. MS infections most frequently occur as subclinical upper respiratory tract infections and may cause air sac disease. MS results in infectious synovitis, an acute to chronic infectious disease of chickens [5]. The co-infection by MG or MS with respiratory virus infections, such as IBV and Newcastle disease, can exacerbate the disease conditions [5]. Both MG and MS infections cause considerable economic losses in the poultry industry by reducing weight gains and meat quality in broilers, causing severe drops in egg production in layers, and increasing embryo mortality in breeders [7].

Infectious bronchitis (IB) is a severe acute disease of poultry caused by IBV, which primarily infects the respiratory tracts, with respiratory disease being the most frequent sign. In addition, IBV can infect the kidneys and reproductive tracts and consequently cause kidney damage and decrease in egg production [8]. Generally, IB is controlled by serotype-specific vaccines [9]. The identification of field isolates is necessary for appropriate vaccinations because these vaccines exhibit little cross-reactivity among different serotypes [10, 11].

In this study, we performed molecular detection of MG, MS, and IBV in chickens from poultry farms at the outskirts of three large cities in Myanmar: Mandalay and Pyin Oo Lwin in February 2018 and Yangon in May 2018. In addition, by analyzing genetic characteristics, we detected at least three genotypes of IBV existing in Myanmar. To our knowledge, this is the first report using molecular analysis to detect MG, MS, and IBV in Myanmar.

Results

Detection of MG, MS, and IBV in poultry farms in Myanmar

MG, MS and IBV were detected on two, four, and eight farms, respectively (Table 1). Both MG and IBV were detected on farm Ma-4, and both MG and MS were detected on farm Ya-1. On farm Ma-4, where MG and IBV were detected, most sampled chickens showed hypodynamia (Table 1). MS was not detected in Mandalay and Pyin Oo Lwin, while four out of the 10 farms in Yangon were positive for MS. However, IBV was widely detected on the farms in Mandalay and Pyin Oo Lwin, whereas it was not detected in the Yangon area (Table 1). Seasonally, MG and MS were detected in both the wet season (May) and dry season (February), whereas IBV was detected only in the dry season (Table 1).

Table 1 Details of the distribution of avian pathogens
Full size table

Phylogenetic analysis of MG, MS, and IBV

The phylogenetic tree for MG revealed that the two MG isolates detected in farm Ma-4 and Ya-1 were genetically identical; however, they were classified in a different cluster than those of vaccine strains (Fig. 1). All the detected MS isolates were not identical to vaccine strains. The detected MS isolates were closely related to strains isolated in East Asian countries (South Korea and Japan) (Fig. 2). No unknown variants were detected in the observed IBV isolates (Fig. 3). The IBV isolates detected in farms Ma-1, Ma-3, Ma-5, and Py-1 were closely related to a vaccine strain, C-78, and IBV isolates detected in farms Ma-2, Ma-4, and Py-5 were similar to IBV strains GN, K446–01 and TM86, respectively (Table 1, Fig. 3).

Fig. 1
figure1

A phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the gapA gene in isolated and reference strains of M. gallisepticum. The tree was built with the neighbor-joining method using the MEGA 6.0 software. Numbers indicate bootstrap percentages (1,000 replicates). The scale indicates the divergence time

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

A phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the vlhA gene in isolated and reference strains of M. synoviae. The methodology was the same as that for M. gallisepticum in Fig. 1

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

A phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the S1 glycoprotein gene in isolated and reference strains of infectious bronchitis virus. The methodology was the same as that for M. gallisepticum in Fig. 1

Full size image

Discussion

Respiratory diseases cause significant economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. Poultry farming is an important industry in Southeast Asian countries, including Myanmar. Nevertheless, surveillance of the distribution of such pathogens causing respiratory diseases is lacking in Myanmar. According to the observations by local veterinarians, respiratory signs that are indicative of IB or mycoplasmosis have been observed in poultry farms in Myanmar. We detected MG, MS, and IBV in poultry farms in Myanmar.

In this study, MG was sporadically detected regardless of the area and season, whereas MS was detected only in the Yangon area in May. In addition, each bacteria strain detected in this study was genetically different from vaccine strains. Furthermore, the vlhA genes of all the MS strains were closely related to those strains isolated in East Asian countries, such as South Korea and Japan, indicating that endemic strains from Asian countries may be prevalent in the poultry farms in Myanmar. Appropriate vaccination programs are necessary to prevent diseases caused by mycoplasmas, because both MG and MS can spread easily through vertical and horizontal transmission [6, 12].

We found that IBV was widely distributed in the two districts around the center of Myanmar (Mandalay and Pyin Oo Lwin) in this study. In contrast, IBV was not detected at farms in the Yangon, the southern area of the country. Samples were collected in Yangon in May, which is the wet season in Myanmar, whereas sampling in Mandalay and Pyin Oo Lwin was conducted in February (the dry season). The climates in Myanmar are largely different in each season and in each area. Therefore, surveillance should be periodically performed throughout the country over the course of the year, especially considering the seasons.

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the S1 gene of the IBVs detected at the Ma-1, Ma-3, Ma-5, and Py-1 farms were closely related to that of the C-78 IBV vaccine strain and that the IBV detected at farm Ma-2 was close to strain GN (both are classified as JP-1 types [13, 14]). The isolate at farm Ma-4 was close to K446–01 (Mass type [13]), and the isolate from farm Py-5 was close to TM86 (JP-2 type [13]). All the IBV types detected are widely distributed [13, 14], and vaccines for their attenuated strains are commercially available. In this survey, we found that the JP-1, JP-2, and Mass types of IBV were present in poultry farms in Myanmar. According to local veterinarians, vaccines with Mass, D274 and 793B serotypes are mainly used to prevent the incidence of IB disease in Myanmar. It is possible that the IBVs detected at farm Ma-4 were derived from attenuated vaccine strains. The fact that other types of IBVs were detected in Myanmar is important for the identification of appropriate vaccines, because vaccines for different types of IBVs do not cross-protect. Therefore, periodical surveillance using larger samples is required to identify the distributions and types of IBVs circulating in Myanmar.

Conclusions

This is the first report showing the presence of MG, MS and IBV in poultry farms in Myanmar. Several genotypes of IBV were detected in Myanmar, and some of them appear to be genetically different from the vaccine strains currently used in Myanmar. To improve vaccination programs and reduce the economic losses caused by these devastating pathogens, periodic surveillance including appropriate sample sizes should be performed. In addition, some agents threatening the poultry industry include enteropathogens, oncogenic viruses, and other respiratory pathogens. Further study is necessary to assess the prevalence of infectious agents and develop control strategies..

Methods

Sample collection

Chicken oropharyngeal swabs were collected from five farms in Mandalay and five farms in Pyin Oo Lwin in February 2018, and 10 farms in Yangon in May 2018. Swab samples were collected from six, nine or twelve chickens in each farm (Table 1), and all samples were collected from adult laying hens. The sample collection was carried out after we obtained informed consent from farm owners. The breeds of chickens were Rhode Island Red and White Leghorn. Samples were transferred to the laboratory in cool condition as dry swabs within 2 days, and kept at − 80 °C until use. Three swabs taken from each chicken were pooled and used for DNA/RNA extraction, following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection and sequence analysis.

Nucleic acid extraction and cDNA synthesis

DNA was extracted from pooled swab samples using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the samples were stored at − 20 °C until use. For RNA extraction, a FastGene RNA Premium/Basic Kit (NIPPON Genetics Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript™ Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) as directed by the manufacturer.

PCR

The DNA and cDNA samples were used as templates for PCR analysis. MG, MS, and IBV were detected by amplifying the pMGA1.2 (hemagglutinin protein) gene, the MS2/12 DNA fragment of vlhA (variable lipoprotein hemagglutinin A gene), and the S1 (the spike glycoprotein) gene, respectively. The primer sequences used in each amplification and the PCR conditions are summarized in Table 2. For MG and MS, nested PCRs were performed. The PCR mixture contained 10 pmol of each primer, 1 U of TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa Bio Inc.), and 200 μM of each deoxynucleotide (TaKaRa Bio Inc.).

Table 2 Primers used for amplification of each gene in this study
Full size table

Sequence analysis

To analyze the genetic characteristics of MG and MS, the gapA gene and the DNA fragment of vlhA gene were amplified using a PCR assay and sequenced. For sequencing, the amplicons were purified using a FastGene gel/PCR extraction kit (NIPPON Genetics Co. Ltd.), and the nucleotide sequences were determined using the GenomeLab™ GeXP Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The resulting sequences of the gapA, vlhA, and S1 genes were aligned using MEGA6 software [19], and the phylogenetic trees were constructed with the same software using the neighbor-joining method [20].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IB:

Infectious bronchitis

IBV:

Infectious bronchitis virus

MG:

Mycoplasma gallisepticum

MS:

Mycoplasma synoviae

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. 1.

    Central Statistical Organization, Ministry of Planning and Finance, The Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar. CHAPTER 9. Agriculture. In: Myanmar statistical yearbook 2016. Nay Pyi Taw; 2016. p. 229–300.

  2. 2.

    Lin TN, Nonthabenjawan N, Chaiyawong S, Bunpapong N, Boonyapisitsopa S, Janetanakit T, et al. Influenza A (H9N2) virus, Myanmar, 2014-2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1041–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Henning J, Morton J, Hla T, Meers J. Mortality rates adjusted for unobserved deaths and associations with Newcastle disease virus serology among unvaccinated village chickens in Myanmar. Prev Vet Med. 2008;85:241–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Saito T, Uchida Y, Myint WW, Thein WZ, Watanabe C, Takemae N, et al. Characterisation of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in Myanmar. Vet Rec. 2008;163:722–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gharibi D, Ghadimipour R, Mayahi M. Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae among commercial poultry in Khouzestan province, Iran. Arch Razi Inst. 2018;73:139–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Raviv Z, Ley DH. Mycoplasmosis: Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Suarez DL, Nair V, editors. Diseases of poultry. 13th ed. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 877–93.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Messa Júnior A, Taunde P, Zandamela AF, Pondja Junior A, Chilundo A, Costa R, et al. Serological screening suggests extensive presence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in backyard chickens in Southern Mozambique. J Vet Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2743187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cavanagh D. Coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. Vet Res. 2007;38:281–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jordan B. Vaccination against infectious bronchitis virus: a continuous challenge. Vet Microbiol. 2017;206:137–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cavanagh D, Elus MM, Cook KA. Relationship between sequence variation in the S1 spike protein of infectious bronchitis virus and the extent of cross-protection in vivo. Avian Pathol. 1997;26:63–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gelb J Jr, Keeler CL Jr, Nix WA, Rosenberger JK, Cloud SS. Antigenic and S-1 genomic characterization of the Delaware variant serotype of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Dis. 1997;41:661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kleven SH. Control of avian mycoplasma infections in commercial poultry. Avian Dis. 2008;52:367–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jackwood MW. Review of infectious bronchitis virus around the world. Avian Dis. 2012;56:634–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mase M, Inoue T, Yamaguchi S, Imada T. Existence of avian infectious bronchitis virus with a European-prevalent 4/91 genotype in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2008;70:1341–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mardassi BB, Mohamed RB, Gueriri I, Boughattas S, Mlik B. Duplex PCR to differentiate between Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma gallisepticum on the basis of conserved species-specific sequences of their hemagglutinin genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:948–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mase M, Tsukamoto K, Imai K, Yamaguchi S. Phylogenetic analysis of avian infectious bronchitis virus strains isolated in Japan. Arch Virol. 2004;149:2069–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ferguson NM, Hepp D, Sun S, Ikuta N, Levisohn S, Kleven SH, et al. Use of molecular diversity of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by gene-targeted sequencing (GTS) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis for epidemiological studies. Microbiology. 2005;151:1883–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dijkman R, Feberwee A, Landman WJ. Development and evaluation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme for Mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Pathol. 2016;45:426–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Saw Bawm, Lat Lat Htun, Ye Htut Aung, and Mar Mar Win, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, and all the farmers and veterinarians who kindly helped with sample collection. We thank Drs. Masayoshi Isezaki, Naoya Maekawa, Tomohiro Okagawa, and Satoru Konnai, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, for their helpful advice. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing. This research was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B: 16H05804 and B: 18H02332) and a Young Scientists grant (B: 16 K18798) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Funding

This research was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B: 16H05804 and B: 18H02332) and a Young Scientists grant (B: 16 K18798) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. All of the funding bodies were applied to sample collection, data analysis and interpretation, and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    Sotaro Fujisawa, Shiro Murata, Masaki Takehara, Ken Katakura & Kazuhiko Ohashi

  2. University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar

    Myint Myint Hmoon & Shwe Yee Win

Authors
  1. Sotaro Fujisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiro Murata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masaki Takehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ken Katakura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Myint Myint Hmoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shwe Yee Win
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kazuhiko Ohashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SF, SM, KK, and KO were responsible for the conception and design of the study. SM, MT, KK, MMH, and SYW collected samples. SF, MT, and SM performed the experiments. SF, MT, and SM analyzed the data. SF, SM, and MT provided intellectual input, laboratory materials, reagents and/or analytic tools. SF wrote the manuscript. SM, KK, and KO contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiro Murata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Swab samples used in this study had obtained based on informed consent from farm owners. Collection of swab samples from chickens was approved by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation of Myanmar (approval number: 5/6000/moali (1192/2017) and 1080/pa10(kha)/2017).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujisawa, S., Murata, S., Takehara, M. et al. Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Mycoplama synoviae, and infectious bronchitis virus in poultry in Myanmar. BMC Vet Res 15, 261 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2018-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Avian mycoplasmosis
  • Mycoplasma gallisepticum
  • Mycoplasma synoviae
  • Infectious bronchitis virus
  • Myanmar

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us