Skip to main content
Download PDF

Two novel monoclonal antibodies against fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 and their application in detection of FAdV-4/10

BMC Veterinary Research volume 15, Article number: 232 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recently, serotype 4 fowl adenovirus (FAdV-4) has spread widely and caused huge economic loss to poultry industry. However, little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of FAdV-4. Fiber protein is thought to be vital for its infection and pathogenesis.

Results

Two novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 were generated, designated as mAb 3B5 and 6H9 respectively. Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) showed that both mAbs only reacted with the FAdV-4 and FAdV-10, not with other serotypes including FAdV-1, FAdV-5, FAdV-6, FAdV-7, FAdV-8 and FAdV-9 tested. Although both mAbs did not recognize the linear epitopes, they could efficiently immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 protein in LMH cells either infected with FAdV-4 or transfected with pcDNA3.1-Fiber-1. Moreover, mAb 3B5 as a capture antibody and HRP-conjugated mAb 6H9 as a detection antibody, a novel sandwich ELISA for efficient detection of FAdV-4 was generated. The limit of detection of the ELISA could reach to 1000 TCID50/ml of FAdV-4 and the ELISA could be efficiently applied to detect FAdV-4 in the clinical samples.

Conclusion

The two mAbs specific targeting fiber-1 generated here would pave the way for further studying on the role of fiber-1 in the infection and pathogenesis of FAdV-4, and the established mAb based sandwich ELISA would provide an efficient diagnostics tool for detection of FAdV-4/10.

Background

Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) belongs to the family Adenoviridae, genus Aviadenovirus [1]. Based on its genome sequence and sera cross-neutralization, FAdV is currently clustered into 5 species (FAdV-A to FAdV-E) with 12 serotypes (FAdV-1 to -8a and FAdV-8b to − 11) [1, 2]. The diseases caused by the infection of FAdV mainly include inclusion body hepatitis (IBH), hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome (HPS), and gizzard erosion and ulceration (GEU) [2,3,4]. Disease of IBH and HPS in chicken flocks has been spread globally, particularly in Eurasian. Among these serotypes, serotype FAdV-2, 8a, 8b and 11 can induce IBH, whereas serotype FAdV-4 is the main causative agent for HPS [5]. Recently, the spread of HPS caused by FAdV-4 has resulted in huge economic loss to poultry industry [5]. Notably, the emerging of the highly pathogenic FAdV-4 with novel genotype and broad host range in China called for more efficient control strategies for the FAdV-4 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The binding of the viral protein with host receptor is critical for initiating the viral infection. Hexon, penton and fiber are three major proteins on the surface of viral particle of the adenovirus [1]. During the infection, the fiber protein, but not the hexon and penton, can directly bind to the viral receptor [1]. It should be noted that serotypes FAdV-1, FAdV-4 and FAdV-10 carry two fiber proteins, designated as fiber-1 and fiber-2 [1]. Previous studies demonstrate that both fiber proteins of FAdV-4 play significant roles in the viral infection and pathogenesis and they carry dominant B cell epitopes which can differentiate FAdV-4 from other serotypes of FAdV [13,14,15]. Since the commercial monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the fiber proteins of FAdV-4 is not available, the molecular mechanism for its infection and pathogenesis of FAdV-4 is largely unknown, and the efficient diagnostics for FAdV-4 is also available. In this study, two novel mAbs specific to the fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 were generated. Both mAbs could efficiently immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 protein either in the infected cells or the transfected cells. Moreover, a mAb based sandwich ELISA for specific detection of FAdV-4/10 was established.

Results

Two mAbs specific to fiber-1 of FAdV-4 were generated

Balb/c mice were immunized with purified prokaryotic fusion protein GST-F1-S and LMH cells infected with FAdV-4 were used as a screening antigen for mAbs. Through IFA screening, two hybridomas cell strains stably secreting mAb against FAdV-4 were generated, named as 3B5 and 6H9 respectively. Moreover, both mAbs could efficiently react with the LMH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1, but not with pcDNA3.1-F2 as described in Fig. 1. To investigate the specificity for the two mAbs, different serotypes of fowl adenoviruses were used to be tested in IFA. As shown in Fig. 2, mAb 3B5 and 6H9 could not react with the LMH cells infected with FAdV-1, FAdV-5, FAdV-7, FAdV-8 and FAdV-9 tested while they could efficiently react with the LMH cells infected with FAdV-4 and FAdV-10. Notably, both FAdV-4 and FAdV-10 belong to FAdV-C species carrying similar fiber-1 protein. Therefore, the two mAbs showed great specificity to FAdV-C species, indicating the application for differentiating FAdV-C from other species of FAdV.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Recognizing fiber-1 of FAdV-4 by the two mAbs in IFA mAb 3B5 and 6H9 reacted with the LMH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 and pcDNA3.1-F2 expressing fiber-1 and fiber-2 of FAdV-4 respectively. The FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was used as secondary antibody

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Cross-reaction for mAb 3B5 and 6H9 against different FAdV viruses in IFA mAb 3B5 and 6H9 reacted with the LMH cells infected with different serotype FAdV viruses including FAdV-1, FAdV-4, FAdV-5, FAdV-6, FAdV-7, FAdV-8, FAdV-9 and FAdV-10 respectively. The FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was used as secondary antibody

Full size image

mAb 3B5 and 6H9 could efficiently immunoprecipitate fiber-1 of FAdV-4

To further characterize the two mAbs generated here, LMH cells infected with FAdV-4 or transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 were analyzed through Western blot and immunoprecipitation. Although both mAbs did not recognize the linear epitopes in Western blot assay, they could efficiently immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 protein in LMH cells either infected with FAdV-4 or transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1. As described in Fig. 3, after the immunoprecipitation of the lysates from LMH cells either infected with FAdV-4 or transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 using mAb 3B5 and 6H9, a specific protein band with the size of 48kD could be found in the immunoprecipitated pellets in the Western blot by using a chicken polyclonal antibody against FAdV-4, whereas such protein band could not be found when using the control mAb. This data demonstrated that mAb 3B5 and 6H9 could efficiently recognize the natural or conformational epitopes in the fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Immunoprecipitation assay for mAb 3B5 and 6H9 a mAb 3B5 and 6H9, but not the control mAb, could immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 protein (about 48kD) in LMH cells infected with FAdV-4. a and b, Western blot assay for the immunoprecipitated pellets or the lysates of the infected cells using chicken sera against FAdV-4 respectively; b mAb 3B5 and 6H9, but not the control mAb, could immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 protein (about 48kD) in LMH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1. a and b, Western blot assay for the immunoprecipitated pellets or the lysates of the transfected cells using chicken sera against FAdV-4 respectively

Full size image

A novel mAbs based sandwich ELISA for detection of FAdV-4/10 was developed

Since both mAbs could efficiently capture the natural fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4, to evaluate whether the two mAbs 3B5 and 6H9 could be applied to generate a sandwich ELISA for specific detection of FAdV-4, the purifed mAbs were labeled with HRP. As shown in Fig. 4-a, the heavy chain and light chain of the purified mAbs 3B5 and 6H9 could be found in the SDS-PAGE analysis. After conjugated with HRP and optimal selection, the mAb 6H9-HRP was used as detection antibody and the purified mAb 3B5 was selected as capture antibody. Since the arithmetric mean OD450 value of the six FAdV-4 free samples was 0.0584, and the cut-off was defined as the two-fold of the mean of the negative samples. Therefore, the OD450 value for the cut-off of the ELISA was determined as 2 × 0.0584 = 0.1168. Specificity analysis demonstrated that the ELISA reacted only with the FAdV-4 and FAdV-10 with high OD450 value, but not with serotypes FAdV-1, FAdV-5, FAdV-6, FAdV-7, FAdV-8 and FAdV-9 tested as shown in Fig. 4-b. Notably, the ELISA did not show cross-reaction with other viral pathogens such as MDV, AIV, ALV, REV, IBV and CAV tested. Sensitivity analysis further showed that the limit of detection (LOD) of the ELISA was 104 TCID50/ml of FAdV-4. As shown in Fig. 4-c, the OD450 of the different FAdV-4 strains with dose of 104 TCID50/ml or higher doses were all higher than the cut-off value whereas those of the FAdV-8 tested were all less than the cut-off value. Moreover, the ELISA could be efficiently used to detect the FAdV-4 in the clinical samples. As shown in Fig. 4d, all the thirty two liver samples from the diseased chicken flock naturally infected with FAdV-4 were positive in the ELISA. Except for three samples with low OD450 value, all other samples showed high OD450 value. This ELISA data for these clinical samples was further confirmed by PCR for amplifying the specific band of FAdV-4 (data not shown).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A novel mAbs based sandwich ELISA for efficient detection of FAdV-4/10 a SDS-PAGE assay for the purified mAb 3B5 and 6H9. Lane 1 and lane 2: the purified mAb 3B5 and 6H9 respectively; Lane3 and lane 4: the unpurified mAb 3B5 and 6H9 respectively; b Specificity assay for the sandwich ELISA using different viruses including FAdV-1, FAdV-4, FAdV-5, FAdV-6, FAdV-7, FAdV-8, FAdV-9, FAdV-10, MDV, AIV, ALV, REV, IBV and CAV; c Sensitivity assay for the sandwich ELISA using different doses of different FAdV-4 isolates; d Detection of FAdV-4 in 32 clinical liver samples using the sandwich ELISA. Three liver samples from the SPF chickens were used as negative control and three liver samples from the chickens experimentally infected with FAdV-4 were used as positive control

Full size image

Discussion

The hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome induced by FAdV-4 infection has caused huge economic losses to the poultry industry globally. However, the molecular mechanism for the infection and pathogenesis of FAdV-4 need to be elucidated. Although ELISA and PCR for detection of antibody and DNA respectively have been reported for FAdV-4 [6, 17, 18], the rapid and efficient ELISA for detection of FAdV-4 virus was not available so far. As the surface protein of the viral particle, fiber protein plays vital roles in the viral infection and contains dominant B cell epitopes which could differentiate different species or serotypes of FAdV. In our previous report, a novel monoclonal antibody (3C2) against fiber-2 of FAdV-4 could not only immunoprecipitate fiber-2 protein, but also could efficiently inhibit the viral replication of FAdV-4 in vitro [16]. That study indicated that fiber-2 of FAdV-4 carries B cell epitopes for neutralizing the infection of FAdV-4. Here, two mAbs against the fiber-1 of FAdV-4, designated as 3B5 and 6H9, were generated using a purified GST fusion protein with the shaft domain of the fiber-1 of FAdV-4 as immunogen. Although both mAbs could not recognize the linear epitopes of fiber-1 and also did not show neutralizing activity against FAdV-4, they could efficiently immunoprecipitate the fiber-1 from the LMH cells either infected with the FAdV-4 or transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 plasmid, highlighting their application in identifying the cellular proteins for interacting with the fiber-1 of FAdV-4. Notably, a sandwich ELISA based on the two mAbs were developed for specific detection of FAdV-4/10. Except for the high specificity to FAdV-4/10, the limit of detection of the ELISA could reach to 1000 TCID50/ml of FAdV-4 and could be efficiently applied in detecting FAdV-4 in the clinical tissue samples, highlighting the feasibility of the ELISA. Since FAdV-10 and FAdV-4 belong to the same species and the fiber proteins from the two serotypes are highly homologous, the cross-reaction with FAdV-10 for the ELISA was also expected which was consistent with the IFA result. This cross-reaction with FAdV-10 is also consistent with the previous finding reported by Feichtner et al when a fiber-2 based ELISA was used to detect the antibody against FAdV-4 [17]. All these studies suggested that FAdV-4 and FAdV-10 could be clustered into one serotype based on the fibers. Moreover, unlike FAdV-4, the infection of FAdV-10 was rarely happened in the field and FAdV-10 was known as a kind of low pathogenic FAdV.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the generation of mAbs against fiber-1 of FAdV-4 and a novel mAbs based sandwich ELISA for efficient detection of FAdV-4/10. The two mAbs specific targeting fiber-1 of FAdV-4 developed here would pave the way for further studying on the roles of fiber-1 in the infection and the identification of the cellular receptor, and provide novel and efficient diagnostics tools for detection of FAdV-4/10.

Methods

Viruses and clinical samples

Serotype 1, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 fowl adenoviruses (FAdV-1, FAdV-5, FAdV-6, FAdV-7, FAdV-9 and FAdV-10) were from ATCC. Serotype 8 fowl adenovirus (FAdV-8), Marek’s disease virus (MDV), avian reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV), Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), chicken infectious anemia virus (CAV), H9N2 avian influenza virus (AIV) and subgroup J avian leukosis virus (ALV) were kept in our laboratory. The Serotype 4 fowl adenovirus FAdV-4 strains SD15, SDWF15, AHFY15, JSCZ15 and JH13 were isolated as previously described [6]. Thirty two liver samples of chickens were from a diseased chicken flock naturally infected with FAdV-4. All the studies associated with the viruses were performed in cabinet under ABSL2 facility.

Cells and plasmids

The LMH cell (the chicken liver cell line, from ATCC) was cultured in F12/DMEM (Gibco, NY, USA) with 10% FBS (Lonsera, Shanghai, China). The plasmids pcDNA3.1-F2 and pcDNA3.1-F1 kept in our laboratory could efficiently express the fiber-2 and fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 respectively.

Antibodies and protein

Chicken sera specific to different serotypes of FAdV were provided by Sinopharm Yangzhou VAC Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. The secondary antibodies including FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG and HRP-labelled rabbit anti-chicken IgY were from Sigma (CA, USA). The purified fusion protein GST-fiber1-S (about 40kD) with the shaft domain of the fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 (corresponding to the amino acids 79–208 of the fiber-1 protein) was generated in our laboratory.

Generation of mAbs

The 6-week-old BALB/C mice were immunized with the purified GST-fiber1-S fusion protein four times every 10 days as previously described [16]. At day 3 post the last immunization, the spleen cells from one immunized mouse were collected and fused with SP2/0 cells as previously described [16]. The hybridoma cells secreting antibodies specific to the fiber-1 of FAdV-4 were screened using IFA. In the IFA analysis, the LMH cells infected with FAdV-4 were used as antigen. After the subcloning of the positive hybridoma cells, the mAbs secreted by these positive clones were further identified by IFA, western blot and immunoprecipitation. The ascites of these identified mAbs were prepared and purified as previously described [16]. All the mice studies were performed under ABSL2 facility. At the end of the experiment, all the mice were first anesthetized with isofluorane and then euthanized by cervical dislocation.

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

LMH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 and pcDNA3.1-F2 respectively or infected with FAdV-4 for three days were fixed with the fixed solution (acetone and ethanol 3:2) for 5 min, and then the IFA was performed according to the previous report [16].

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting

LMH cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-F1 or infected with FAdV-4 for 3 days were lysed in lysis buffer (CST, MA, USA) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktail (CST), and PMSF (Beyotime, Shanghai China). The lysates were collected after centrifugation for 20 min at 12000 rpm and the supernatants were used for western blot and immunoprecipitation as previously described [16].

Sandwich ELISA

The ELISA plates were coated with the capture mAb (100 μL/well) diluted in 0.1 M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4 °C. And the coated ELISA plates were then blocked with PBST (pH 7.4, containing 0.05% Tween-20) with 1% FBS and 5% skimmed milk for 2 h at 37 °C. After the ELISA plates were washed once with PBST, the diluted samples (100 μL/well) in PBST were subsequently added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After the ELISA plates were washed with PBST for four times and the mAb conjugated with HRP (100 μL/well) diluted with 1% skimmed milk in PBST was added to each well. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C and washing another four times with PBST, the TMB substrate solution (100 μL/well) was added into each well, and the ELISA plates were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the dark. 2 M H2SO4 (50 μL/well) was then added to stop the reaction and the value of OD450 was determined by an ELISA plate reader. The condition for the ELISA was optimized by analysis of the OD450 value and the positive/negative ratio (P/N) of the samples at different conditions. The cut-off value of the ELISA was evaluated by using 60 FAdV-4 free samples including tissue samples and chicken cloacal swab samples, and was determined by calculating the two folds of the arithmetic mean of these FAdV-4 free samples. For detection of the clinical tissue samples, the liver samples from a diseased chicken flock were homogenated (1 g tissue in 1 mL PBS), and the supernatants from the homogenates were diluted in 1:10 with PBS for the ELISA test.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AIV:

Avian influenza virus

ALV:

Avian leukosis virus

CAV:

Chicken infectious anemia virus

FAdV:

Fowl adenovirus

IBV:

Infectious bronchitis virus

IFA:

Indirect immunofluorescent assay

mAb:

Monoclonal antibody

MDV:

Marek’s disease virus

REV:

Avian reticuloendotheliosis virus

References

  1. Family-Adenoviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus Taxonomy. Edn. San Diego: Elsevier; 2012. p. 125–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niczyporuk JS. Phylogenetic and geographic analysis of fowl adenovirus field strains isolated from poultry in Poland. Arch Virol. 2016;161(1):33–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittal D, Jindal N, Tiwari AK, Khokhar RSJV: Characterization of fowl adenoviruses associated with hydropericardium syndrome and inclusion body hepatitis in broiler chickens. 2014, 25(1):114–119.

  4. Okuda Y, Ono M, Shibata I, Sato S. Pathogenicity of serotype 8 fowl adenovirus isolated from gizzard erosions of slaughtered broiler chickens. J Vet Med Sci. 2004;66(12):1561–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schachner A, Matos M, Grafl B, Hess M. Fowl adenovirus-induced diseases and strategies for their control - a review on the current global situation. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(2):111–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye JQ, Liang GC, Zhang JJ, Wang WK, Song N, Wang P, Zheng WL, Xie Q, Shao HX, Wan ZM, et al. Outbreaks of serotype 4 fowl adenovirus with novel genotype, China. Emerg Microbes Infec. 2016;5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu YK, Wan WY, Gao DS, Li YT, Yang X, Liu HY, Yao HX, Chen L, Wang CQ, Zhao J. Genetic characterization of novel fowl aviadenovirus 4 isolates from outbreaks of hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome in broiler chickens in China. Emerg Microbes Infec. 2016;5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T, Jin QY, Ding PY, Wang YB, Chai YX, Li YF, Liu X, Luo J, Zhang GP. Molecular epidemiology of hydropericardium syndrome outbreak-associated serotype 4 fowl adenovirus isolates in Central China. Virol J. 2016;13.

  9. Niu Y, Sun Q, Zhang G, Sun W, Liu X, Xiao Y, Shang Y, Liu S. Epidemiological investigation of outbreaks of fowl adenovirus infections in commercial chickens in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):e121–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li PH, Zheng PP, Zhang TF, Wen GY, Shao HB, Luo QP. Fowl adenovirus serotype 4: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic detection, and vaccine strategies. Poultry Sci. 2017;96(8):2630–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li CJ, Li HY, Wang DD, Wang JJ, Wang YM, Wang SC, Li JD, Liu P, Wang JL, Xu SZ, et al. Characterization of fowl adenoviruses isolated between 2007 and 2014 in China. Vet Microbiol. 2016;197:62–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao J, Ruan SF, Guo Y, He ZR, Xu MY, Zhang GZ. Serological and phylogenetic analysis indicating prevalence of fowl adenovirus in China. Vet Rec. 2018;182(13):381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen L, Yin LJ, Zhou QF, Li QH, Luo YY, Xu ZC, Zhang Y, Xue CY, Cao YC. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant fiber-2 protein in protecting SPF chickens against fowl adenovirus 4. Vaccine. 2018;36(9):1203–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schachner A, Marek A, Jaskulska B, Bilic I, Hess M. Recombinant FAdV-4 fiber-2 protein protects chickens against hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome (HHS). Vaccine. 2014;32(9):1086–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruan SF, Zhao J, Yin XM, He ZR, Zhang GZ. A subunit vaccine based on fiber-2 protein provides full protection against fowl adenovirus serotype 4 and induces quicker and stronger immune responses than an inactivated oil-emulsion vaccine. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:145–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang P, Zhang JJ, Wang WK, Li TF, Liang GC, Shao HX, Gao W, Qin AJ, Ye JQ. A novel monoclonal antibody efficiently blocks the infection of serotype 4 fowl adenovirus by targeting fiber-2. Vet Res. 2018;49.

  17. Feichtner F, Schachner A, Berger E, Hess M. Development of sensitive indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for specific detection of antibodies against fowl adenovirus serotypes 1 and 4 in chickens. Avian Pathol. 2018;47(1):73–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He ZR, Ruan SF, Zhao J, Yang HM, Zhang GZ. Recombinant Fiber-2 protein-based indirect ELISA for antibody detection of fowl adenovirus serotype 4. Avian Dis. 2018;62(1):73–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thanks for Dr. Wei Zhang (Sinopharm Yangzhou VAC Biological Engineering Co.Ltd) for kindly helping us collect the clinical samples.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research & Development (R&D) Plan (2018YFD0500106, 2016YFD0501605), International cooperation projects for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31761133002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472171), Special Foundation for State Basic Research Program of China (2013FY113300–4), Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Biological Hazard Factors (Animal Origin) for Agrifood Safety and Quality (26116120), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hongxia Shao and Yanan Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu, China

    Hongxia Shao, Yanan Lu, Weikang Wang, Tuofan Li, Zhimin Wan, Guangchen Liang, Wei Gao, Aijian Qin & Jianqiang Ye

  2. Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu, China

    Hongxia Shao, Yanan Lu, Weikang Wang, Tuofan Li, Zhimin Wan, Guangchen Liang, Wei Gao, Aijian Qin & Jianqiang Ye

  3. Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu, China

    Hongxia Shao, Yanan Lu, Weikang Wang, Tuofan Li, Zhimin Wan, Guangchen Liang, Wei Gao, Aijian Qin & Jianqiang Ye

  4. Sinopharm Yangzhou VAC Biological Engineering Co. Ltd, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China

    Jianjun Zhang

  5. Institutes of Agricultural Science and Technology Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu, China

    Aijian Qin & Jianqiang Ye

Authors
  1. Hongxia Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weikang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tuofan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianjun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhimin Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guangchen Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Aijian Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jianqiang Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HS, JY and AQ designed the project. HS, YL, WW and GL carried out the experiments, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript. JY supervised all the experiments and participated in the data analysis. HS, TL, JZ, ZW and WG discussed and prepared the final report. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqiang Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The 32 liver samples collected from a diseased chicken flock were kindly provided by the farm owner for diagnostics. The 6-week-old BALB/C mice for preparing monoclonal antibodies were purchased from the Center of Comparative Medicine in Yangzhou University. At the end of the experiment, all the mice were first anesthetized with isofluorane and then euthanized by cervical dislocation. All animal experiments complied with institutional animal care guidelines and were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Yangzhou University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, H., Lu, Y., Wang, W. et al. Two novel monoclonal antibodies against fiber-1 protein of FAdV-4 and their application in detection of FAdV-4/10. BMC Vet Res 15, 232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1987-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1987-5

Keywords

  • FAdV-4
  • Fiber-1
  • mAb
  • IFA
  • Immunoprecipitation
  • Sandwich ELISA

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us