Skip to main content
Download PDF

Truncated Rep protein of porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) caused by a naturally occurring mutation reduced virus replication in PK15 cells

BMC Veterinary Research volume 15, Article number: 248 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) is the causative agent of porcine circovirus-associated diseases (PCVADs). The infection of PCV2 is widespread and has serious consequence, thereby causing significant economic losses in the swine industry worldwide. Previously, we found that a strain named YiY-3-2-3 has a naturally occurring point mutation (G710 to A710) in ORF1 region, which leads to a shorten product of the rep gene (945 to 660 base pair). Importantly, the Rep protein is responsible for genome replication of PCV2. To explore the effects of this mutation on the PCV2 replication, in the current study we constructed infectious clone of this IF-YiY-3-2-3, as well as those of its two parental strains of IF-YiY-3-2-1 and IF-YiY-3-2-10. Subsequently, these infectious clones which have 1.1 copy of PCV2 genome of their corresponding strains were transfected into PK15 cells to obtain rescued viruses, respectively.

Results

Though all of the three infectious clones could be rescued, the copy number and infectivity of these rescued viruses were significantly different, as analyzed by fluorescence quantitative PCR, Tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50), and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Notably, whether the PCV2 copy number, viral titer or the infectivity of rescued viruses from infectious clone IF-YiY-3-2-3 was significantly less than those of its parental clones. Meanwhile, the spatial structure of the Rep protein from the IF-YiY-3-2-3 displayed an apparent truncation at the C-terminal.

Conclusions

These findings therefore suggest that the Rep protein with truncated C-terminal would reduce virus replication and infectivity, and there might also exist both favorable and unfavorable mutations in the ORF1 of PCV2 in the process of its evolution.

Background

Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2), belonging to the genus Circovirus of the family Circoviridae, is a small, circular, single-stranded DNA virus [1]. PCV2 causes the intumescentia of lymph node, weight loss, jaundice, anemia and diarrhea mainly in 10–15 weeks old piglets, thus resulting in low productivity and enormous economic losses [2, 3]. PCV2 is considered the major etiological agent of porcine circovirus associated diseases (PCVADs), which includes postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS), porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS), porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), congenital tremors type A-II (CT), and reproductive failure [4,5,6].

The PCV2 genome is 1767 or 1768 nucleotides (nt) in length and contains three major open reading frames (ORFs), namely, ORF1, ORF2 and ORF3. ORF1 encodes two replication-related proteins, Rep and Rep’; ORF2 encodes the major structural capsid (Cap) protein which is also the major immunogenic protein; ORF3 encodes an apoptosis-inducing/pro-apoptotic protein [7,8,9]. Currently, PCV2 is classified into five major groups: PCV2a, PCV2b, PCV2c, PCV2d and PCV2e, and the genetic distance between these different genotypes is at least 0.035 [10, 11]. Additionally, PCV2a and PCV2b can be further divided into five subgroups (2A-2E) and two subgroups (1A-1B), respectively. The occurrence of high genetic variation and genotype shift often leads to the prevalence of a major genotype or the coexistence of different genotypes of PCV2 in diverse regions and different periods [12, 13]. Nowadays, PCV2b and PCV2d are deemed to be the predominantly circulating genotypes, and increase the pathogenicity of PCVAD [12, 14,15,16,17].

Accumulating studies have confirmed that PCV2 is continuously evolving through genome recombination or point mutation [18, 19]. Indeed, the manner of point mutation for PCV2 evolution has been described by many studies [20,21,22,23]. In this regard, we, in a previous study, not only confirmed the individual animal or the individual organ from this animal co-infected with diverse PCV2 genotypes, or even sub-genotypes, but also provided evidence of diverse point mutations acquired during immune escape by PCV2. Additionally, we noticed that the occurrence of point mutations exists in both ORF1 and ORF2 of PCV2 [24], as consistent with previous reports [25, 26]. However, the biological importance and significance of novel amino acid alterations, especially those in ORF1, are less characterized and explored.

In this study, we intended to investigate the consequence of one naturally occurring mutation (G710 to A710) in the ORF1 region of a recently reported PCV2 strain (YiY-3-2-3), which potentially has a shortened Rep protein [24]. To this aim, we compared the replication capability of this PCV2 mutant strain with its two parental strains YiY-3-2-1 (PCV2b-1B) and YiY-3-2-10 (PCV2d) [24] by constructing the infectious clones of them. Meanwhile, we analyzed the infectivity of these recovered viruses through a series of methodologies.

Methods

Samples collection and PCV2 detection

The collection of clinical samples (spleen, lymph node, and lung) and the preparation of genomic DNAs have been described previously. The presence of PCV2 was identified by PCR using a forward primer ZY009 and a reverse primer ZY010 (Table 1) [24]. PCR amplification was initiated by preheating at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 1 Primers used in this study
Full size table

PCV2 genomic DNA amplification and sequencing

The complete genome of PCV2 was amplified from the sample DNAs using a set of primers designed according to the sequence of a PCV2 strain (GenBank No. AY321991). The forward primer was ZY001 and the reverse primer was ZY002 (Table 1). PCR amplification was initiated by preheating at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by extraction with a DNA Gel Extraction Kit (omega, USA). The purified PCR products were cloned into pSP-72 cloning vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced by genscript (Nanjing, China). The whole genome sequence was assembled by using DNAstar.

Construction of infectious clones

To construct the infectious clones, a set of primers including HY008, HY009, HY010, HY011 for pSP72-PCV2b-1B-YiY-3-2-1 (IF-YiY-3-2-1) and pSP72-PCV2b-1B-YiY-3-2-3 (IF-YiY-3-2-3), a set of primers containing HY010, HY011, HY012, HY013 for pSP72-PCV2d-YiY-3-2-10 (IF-YiY-3-2-10), were designed and synthesized to amplify the DNA fragment of 1.1 copy PCV2 genome via PCR (Table 1 and Fig. 1) [27]. PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gels by electrophoresis. DNA band having full length PCV2 genome was excised and purified by using a kit (Omega, USA). The plasmids of infectious clones were constructed by inserting the 1.1 copy of PCV2 genomic DNA fragment into double-digested pSP72 vector (KpnI and HindIII), respectively. The resultant plasmids named IF-YiY-3-2-1, IF-YiY-3-2-3 and IF-YiY-3-2-10 were verified by restriction enzyme KpnI and HindIII digestion and DNA sequencing.

Fig. 1
figure1

Diagram demonstrating the constructed infectious clone which includes a 1.1 copy of PCV2 genome, additionally, the location of the major ORFs encoding structural and non-structural proteins are also indicated

Full size image

Transfection of infectious clone plasmids

Constructed infectious clones were separately transfected into PK15 cells seeded into 6-well plate using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Normal PK15 cells served as negative control. The cells were incubated for 8 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a serum-free DMEM, then discarded the media and incubated with fresh DMEM containing 5% FBS (fetal bovine serum) for serial passages. The rescued viruses cultured via serial passages was separately collected from the cell supernatants and stored at − 20 °C.

Transmission Electron microscopy (TEM)

Seventy-two hours after the transfection of the infectious clone plasmids into PK15 cells, the media and cells were collected, followed by three freeze-thawed cycles, and then the cell debris were removed by centrifugation [28]. The morphology of the rescued viruses, together with that of the PCV2 virus-like particle (VLP) described before [29], were examined by TEM.

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

PCV2-free PK-15 cells were grown in 48-well plate until reaching 70–80% confluency. Each plate was inoculated with identical amounts of various rescued viruses (108 copy number) or the positive control rescued viruses which were produced by transfecting PK15 cells with the infectious clone of PCV2d (Genbank number: KP112486), respectively. After 2 h of incubation, the inoculum was removed and washed three times with PBS. DMEM medium (Gibco BRL Life Technologies, NY, USA) containing 5% FBS was added and the infected cells were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was performed to detect infectious viruses. Rabbit anti-PCV2 serum (1:1000) diluted with 1% BSA was added to the wells, then incubated with a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin donkey IgG (1:1000) (Gibco BRL Life Technologies, NY, USA). The fluorescent signals were observed by a fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For the quantification of the percentage of cells infected by PCV2 viruses, cells in at least five random fields were examined and calculated. All assays were repeated at least three times.

Real-time PCR analysis

Real-time PCR primers were designed by primer-blast according to the virus-specific sequence (Genbank number: KJ867555). Primer pairs ZY097 and ZY098 (Table 1) were used for real-time PCR to calculate the virus load in the supernatants of 1st to 6th passages. The real-time PCR assay was conducted with SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, China) and 2 μl of virus in 20 μl reaction mixtures. The parameter for real-time PCR consisted of 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing and extension at 60 °C for 30 s. All assays were repeated at least three times with each experiment performed in triplicate.

Tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) assay

TCID50 assay was used to determine the titers of the rescued viruses. Briefly, the rescued viruses of 3rd to 6th passages were 10-fold serially diluted in DMEM medium supplemented with 2% FBS and antibiotics. Each rescued virus dilution was inoculated into four separate wells containing about 2 × 104 PK15 cells. After absorption for 2 h at 37 °C, the liquids in the wells were removed, and DMEM with 2% FBS was added to the wells. Plates were incubated for an additional 72 h at 37 °C. After the media were removed, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS solution for 20 min at room temperature and washed three times with PBS. Positive cells were made visible through the IFA method using anti-PCV2 antibody as described above. Virus titers in cell cultures for each passage were then determined by a microtitration infectivity assay and recorded as TCID50/ml by using the Reed-Muench method [30]. The TCID50 assay was at least repeated three times.

One-step growth curve experiment

One-step growth curve assay was particularly performed to determine the growth of the rescued viruses (including the Positive control, YiY-3-2-3, YiY-3-2-1 and YiY-3-2-10) [31]. Briefly, PCV2-free PK-15 cells were grown in a 12-well plate until the density reaching 50%. Each well was inoculated with identical amounts of rescued viruses. Both the supernatant and cell pellet were collected at different time intervals after inoculation. One-step growth curve was drawn according to the results of fluorescence quantitative PCR. The assay was at least repeated three times.

Three-dimensional mapping of amino acids in the Rep protein of PCV2

The Rep amino acid residues among the three PCV2 isolates were aligned through the website (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/). The spatial structures of these three PCV2 Rep proteins were analyzed by mapping them with a solid surface, simulated with the modeller software. Three-dimensional structures of the PCV2 Rep protein were displayed with PyMOL version 1.7.4.4 (www.pymol.org) [32].

Statistical analysis

All assays were repeated at least three times, with each experiment performed in triplicate. One-way ANOVA was used to compare results between different groups. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS, non-significant.

Results

The generation of rescued viruses for mutant PCV2 and its parental strains

The YiY-3-2-3 strain had a G710 to A710 point mutation in the ORF1 region, which leads to a shortened rep gene (from 945 to 660 base pairs) in length, thereby encoding a carboxyl-terminally truncated Rep protein with 219 amino acids (aa) instead of 315aa in length. To investigate the effect of this G710 to A710 mutation in ORF1 on PCV2 virus replication, we constructed the infectious clones of this mutant strain and its two parental strains. These three infectious clone plasmids which respectively contain 1.1 copy of PCV2 genome illustrated in Fig. 1 were confirmed by the digestion of double restrictive enzymes since an appropriate 1.9 kb inserted fragment could be observed. Additionally, DNA sequencing also verified the sequences. Successfully constructed infectious clone plasmids were designated as IF-YiY-3-2-1, IF-YiY-3-2-3 and IF-YiY-3-2-10, respectively, and transfected into PK15 cells for the generation of rescued viruses.

The morphology and infectivity of rescued viruses

The rescued viruses were firstly examined by TEM. As shown in Fig. 2, the viruses had a spherical morphology with a size of 17–22 nm in diameter, as similar to those of PCV2-VLPs, suggesting that the viruses derived from infectious clones were successfully rescued. To substantiate this conclusion, we performed IFA to analyze the infectivity of these viruses. IFA results reflected an important fact that the rescued viruses had the ability to infect PK15 cells and possessed good reactivity and specificity against the anti-PCV2 antibody, while the infectivity of them was significantly different (Fig. 3a). The quantification of PCV2-positive cells demonstrated that the wild type or positive control viruses had the highest infectivity (16.25%), followed by the rescued viruses from IF-YiY-3-2-10 and IF-YiY-3-2-1 infectious clones, whereas no or few fluorescent signals were observed in IF-YiY-3-2-3 rescued viruses infected cells, as almost comparable to those in uninfected cells. The statistical analysis clearly demonstrated significant differences among these three rescued viruses (P<0.01) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 2
figure2

The morphology and microstructure of the rescued viruses produced from PK15 cells, the representative image indicated that the rescued viruses have a spherical morphology with a size of 17–22 nm in diameter, as similar to those of PCV2-VLPs

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

IFA results of PK cells infected by PCV2 rescued viruses. a Shown were representative IFA images (Magnification: 20 × 10, Olympus), NC, negative control; PC, positive control. b Quantification of PK15 cells infected by PCV2 viruses (n = 5). Results were expressed as mean ± SD. IFA assays were independently repeated three times. **represents statistical significance P<0.01 between indicated groups

Full size image

The analysis of viral load and titer

To further analyze the effect of G710 to A710 point mutation in the ORF1 on PCV2 virus replication, the rescued viruses from passage 1st to 6th (e.g. 1–6 generation) were respectively harvested from PK15 cells, and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR assay for the measurement of PCV2 DNA copy number. As indicated in Fig. 4, the viral load in the supernatants of those three rescued viruses displayed pronounced differences among them (P<0.01). Several characteristics could be summarized: a) the viral load from rescued viruses YiY-3-2-1 and YiY-3-2-10 was similar at the beginning (namely, 1st generation), a slight increase in viral load was observed for YiY-3-2-10, while a markedly decrease in viral load was seen for YiY-3-2-1 with the increase of passages; b) the initial viral load of YiY-3-2-3 was lower than those of the other two, furthermore, the downward trend of the viral load from 1st to 6th generation was more pronounced than that of YiY-3-2-1; c) from 1st to 6th generation the viral load for those three rescued viruses demonstrated an order of YiY-3-2-10 > YiY-3-2-1 > YiY-3-2-3.

Fig. 4
figure4

The virus load of PCV2 from 1st to 6th generation of serial passages was reflected by determining PCV2 copy number using quantitative real-time PCR. The X-axis shows the generations examined, while the Y-axis indicates the viral load as the logarithm of the copy number in the cell supernatants. Results were expressed as mean ± SD. Real-time PCR was repeated at least three times with each experiment performed in triplicate. **represents statistical significance P<0.01 among different groups

Full size image

Additionally, the viral titer of rescued viruses from passage 3rd to 6th (e.g. 3–6 generation) was also determined by IFA [30]. As indicated in Fig. 5, the viral titer of those three rescued viruses displayed significant differences among them (P<0.01). The results were generally in accordance with the data of the detection of PCV2 genomic copy number. Notably, the titers for YiY-3-2-3 rescued viruses were almost undetected in the whole process, and the TCID50 for the P1 and P2 generations of YiY-3-2-10 and YiY-3-2-1 remained low level and non-significant difference (Data not shown).

Fig. 5
figure5

The viral titers of PCV2 from 3rd to 6th generation of serial passages was determined by IFA assay. The X-axis indicates the generations tested, while the Y-axis shows the viral titer as the logarithm of the TCID50 in the cell supernatants. **represents statistical significance P<0.01 among different groups

Full size image

The virus growth of the mutant strain YiY-3-2-3

To explore whether the strain YiY-3-2-3 losses its ability to replicate, a one-step growth curve experiment was performed to determine the virus contents in both the supernatant and the cell pellet. As indicated in Fig. 6, the results for the contents of intracellular and extracellular viruses demonstrated that following the infection of PK15 cells with YiY-3-2-3 rescued viruses, there were no significant changes in the virus contents within 72 h, which are significantly different from the one-step growth curves of the positive control and YiY-3-2-10 [31].

Fig. 6
figure6

The one-step growth curves of the rescued viruses (including the Positive control, YiY-3-2-3, YiY-3-2-1 and YiY-3-2-10) were performed by determining PCV2 genomic copy number using quantitative real-time PCR. a The content of the intracellular virus; b The content of the extracellular virus. The X-axis shows the incubation time, while the Y-axis indicates the viral load as the logarithm of the copy number of intracellular and extracellular virus. Results were expressed as mean ± SD. This assay was repeated three times. ** and *** represents statistical significance P<0.01 and P<0.001 relative to the YiY-3-2-3 group, respectively

Full size image

The aa sequence and structural analysis for the Rep proteins of the mutant and parental strains

To study the effect of single amino acid alteration on the structure of PCV2 Rep protein, primary amino acid sequence alignment of the three PCV2 Rep proteins from the mutant YiY-3-2-3 and its parental strains were conducted by using MultAlin, and the spatial structures of them were simulated by mapping with a solid surface. As shown in Fig. 7a, there were two amino acid alterations in the ORF1 of the two parental strains, while the Rep protein from the mutant YiY-3-2-3 strain only had 219 amino acids, 95 amino acids less than those of the other two parental strains. Consequently, the spatial structure of the Rep protein from theYiY-3-2-3 strain had an apparent truncation at the C-terminal, while those of the two parental strains were highly similar.

Fig. 7
figure7

Primary amino acid sequence alignment and three-dimensional mapping of amino acids for the three PCV2 Rep proteins. a Comparison of the sequences of amino acid residues in the Rep proteins among the three PCV2 isolates. (GenBank accession numbers KU317473, KX831483 and KX831476). b The surface structures of PCV2 Rep proteins were generated based on the amino acid sequences, and displayed using PyMOL

Full size image

Discussion

The genome of PCV2, being in a closed stem-loop shape (Fig. 1), is replicated in a rolling circle manner [33], early studies constructed infectious clone of it through the ligation of two copies of PCV2 genomic DNA, thereby facilitating to enhance the replication feasibility and form continuous genome for progeny viruses [34]. In this study we used 1.1 copy of PCV2 genome including two in tandem PCV2 origins to generate infectious clones, as consistent with a recent report [35]. Importantly, rescued viruses were obtained and confirmed, as indicated by TEM observation and IFA assay. Therefore, our work and previous reports collectively suggest that a length of about 1.1 copy of PCV2 genome may represent the minimum requirement for successfully constructing PCV2 infectious clone and obtaining rescued virus.

As mentioned above, the major immunogenic capsid (Cap) protein encoded by the ORF2 of PCV2 is tightly related to the pathogenicity of this virus, the mutations in the ORF2 therefore are much concerned and intensively studied [30, 36,37,38,39]. In contrast, the mutations occurred in the ORF1 are rarely reported, mainly because the Rep protein and the splice variant Rep’ protein are regarded just responsible for PCV2 genome replication [40]. However, several studies have demonstrated that things may be not so simple. For instance, PCV1 has 86% amino acid sequence identity and antigenic cross-reactivity with PCV2, while it is non-pathogenic. Furthermore, a chimera incorporating ORF1 from PCV1 and ORF2 from PCV2 is also non-pathogenic in pigs [41]. These suggest that ORF1 not only is responsible for encoding Rep and Rep’ proteins but also contributes to the alteration in the pathogenicity of PCV2. So far, there was only one report describing the effects of the mutations in the ORF1 on PCV2 replication, while these mutations reported were artificially created [42]. Thus, our study should be the first report characterizing the effect of naturally occurring mutation in the ORF1 on the PCV2 genome replication. More importantly, the results of IFA, viral load assay and viral titration commonly indicated that the G710 to A710 mutation in the ORF1 causing a shortened Rep protein significantly reduced virus replication and infectivity. In accordance with this, the results of the simulation of non-homologous structure also confirmed that the Rep protein of this mutant PCV2 strain is truncated, while those of its two parental strains remain highly similar. These results suggest that single amino acid change may be not enough to affect the major structure of Rep protein unless this alteration leads to a completely structural abnormality (e.g. a truncated Rep protein reported here). This may at least partially explain the differences observed in virus replication and infectivity among these PCV2 strains, though the structures modeling of PCV2 Rep protein are not so ideal due to lacking of a reference. Therefore, this finding not only strengthened the contribution of the ORF1 to PCV2-associated pathogenesis, but also provided the first and direct evidence that in the process of PCV2 evolution there may also exist both favorable and unfavorable mutations in the ORF1, implying the possibility to find higher titer viruses for producing more effectively inactivated vaccine to prevent porcine circovirus diseases. Moreover, our finding also raised an interesting question about whether enhancing the levels of Rep and Rep’ protein in cells facilitates the virus replication of PCV2. In addition, our study revealed that the genome copy number and TCID50 of the two parental virus strains YiY-3-2-1 and YiY-3-2-10 are significantly different. We speculated that the difference might be derived from the alterations of two amino acids at the N-terminal of the ORF1 between them, or this might be associated with the difference in the Cap proteins of them. Notably, compared with that of YiY-3-2-1 strain, there was an amino acid (lysine) elongation at the C-terminus of YiY-3-2-10 strain [43]. Further investigations are required to clarify these.

Conclusion

In summary, this study for the first time demonstrates that the infectious clones which have 1.1 copy of PCV2 without or with point mutations in the ORF1 can be recovered in vitro and the naturally occurring G710 to A710 mutation resulting in C-terminal truncated Rep protein reduces viral replication and infectivity. The information reported here facilitates future investigations on the contribution of the ORF1 to the virulence and pathogenicity of PCV2.

Availability of data and materials

Raw data for tables and figures of the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Cap:

Capsid

CT:

Congenital tremors type A-II

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

IFA:

Indirect immunofluorescence assay

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

NC:

Negative control

ORFs:

Open reading frames

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PC:

Positive control

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PCV2:

Porcine circovirus 2

PCVADs:

Porcine circovirus-associated diseases

PDNS:

Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome

PK15:

Porcine kidney cell line

PMWS:

Postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome

PRDC:

Porcine respiratory disease complex

TCID50 :

Tissue culture infective dose 50

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

VLP:

Virus-like particle

References

  1. 1.

    Allan GM, Ellis JA: Porcine circoviruses: a review. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc 2000, 12(1):3–14.

  2. 2.

    Ramamoorthy S, Meng XJ. Porcine circoviruses: a minuscule yet mammoth paradox. Anim Health Res Rev. 2009;10(1):1–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Segales J, Kekarainen T, Cortey M. The natural history of porcine circovirus type 2: from an inoffensive virus to a devastating swine disease? Vet Microbiol. 2013;165(1–2):13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Grau-Roma L, Crisci E, Sibila M, Lopez-Soria S, Nofrarias M, Cortey M, Fraile L, Olvera A, Segales J. A proposal on porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) genotype definition and their relation with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) occurrence. Vet Microbiol. 2008;128(1–2):23–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ellis J, Clark E, Haines D, West K, Krakowka S, Kennedy S, Allan GM. Porcine circovirus-2 and concurrent infections in the field. Vet Microbiol. 2004;98(2):159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Opriessnig T, Meng XJ, Halbur PG. Porcine circovirus type 2 associated disease: update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007;19(6):591–615.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cheung AK. Transcriptional analysis of porcine circovirus type 2. Virology. 2003;305(1):168–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nawagitgul P, Morozov I, Bolin SR, Harms PA, Sorden SD, Paul PS. Open reading frame 2 of porcine circovirus type 2 encodes a major capsid protein. J Gen Virol. 2000;81(Pt 9):2281–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liu J, Chen I, Kwang J. Characterization of a previously unidentified viral protein in porcine circovirus type 2-infected cells and its role in virus-induced apoptosis. J Virol. 2005;79(13):8262–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Segales J, Olvera A, Grau-Roma L, Charreyre C, Nauwynck H, Larsen L, Dupont K, McCullough K, Ellis J, Krakowka S, et al. PCV-2 genotype definition and nomenclature. Vet Rec. 2008;162(26):867–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang F, Guo X, Ge X, Wang Z, Chen Y, Cha Z, Yang H. Genetic variation analysis of Chinese strains of porcine circovirus type 2. Virus Res. 2009;145(1):151–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Afolabi KO, Iweriebor BC, Okoh AI, Obi LC. Global status of porcine circovirus type 2 and its associated diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Adv Virol. 2017;2017:6807964.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Thangthamniyom N, Sangthong P, Poolperm P, Thanantong N, Boonsoongnern A, Hansoongnern P, Semkum P, Petcharat N, Lekcharoensuk P. Genetic diversity of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in Thailand during 2009-2015. Vet Microbiol. 2017;208:239–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Beach NM, Meng XJ. Efficacy and future prospects of commercially available and experimental vaccines against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2). Virus Res. 2012;164(1–2):33–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xiao CT, Halbur PG, Opriessnig T. Global molecular genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) sequences confirms the presence of four main PCV2 genotypes and reveals a rapid increase of PCV2d. J Gen Virol. 2015;96(Pt 7):1830–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Franzo G, Tucciarone CM, Cecchinato M, Drigo M. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) evolution before and after the vaccination introduction: a large scale epidemiological study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39458.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu C, Liu Y, Chen H, Feng H, Chen Y, Wang Y, Wang J, Liu D, Deng R, Zhang G. Genetic and immunogenicity analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 strains isolated in Central China. Arch Virol. 2018.

  18. 18.

    Hesse R, Kerrigan M, Rowland RR. Evidence for recombination between PCV2a and PCV2b in the field. Virus Res. 2008;132(1–2):201–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Olvera A, Cortey M, Segales J. Molecular evolution of porcine circovirus type 2 genomes: phylogeny and clonality. Virology. 2007;357(2):175–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Guo L, Fu Y, Wang Y, Lu Y, Wei Y, Tang Q, Fan P, Liu J, Zhang L, Zhang F, et al. A porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) mutant with 234 amino acids in capsid protein showed more virulence in vivo, compared with classical PCV2a/b strain. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41463.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mu C, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Martin DP, Xia P, Cui B. Genetic variation and phylogenetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 infections in Central China. Virus Genes. 2012;45(3):463–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang N, Zhan Y, Wang A, Zhang L, Khayat R, Yang Y. In silico analysis of surface structure variation of PCV2 capsid resulting from loop mutations of its capsid protein (cap). J Gen Virol. 2016;97(12):3331–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhan Y, Wang N, Zhu Z, Wang Z, Wang A, Deng Z, Yang Y. In silico analyses of antigenicity and surface structure variation of an emerging porcine circovirus genotype 2b mutant, prevalent in southern China from 2013 to 2015. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(4):922–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hu Y, Zhan Y, Wang D, Xie X, Liu T, Liu W, Wang N, Deng Z, Lei H, Yang Y, et al. Evidence of natural co-infection with PCV2b subtypes in vivo. Arch Virol. 2017;162(7):2015–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kekarainen T, Gonzalez A, Llorens A, Segales J. Genetic variability of porcine circovirus 2 in vaccinating and non-vaccinating commercial farms. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 8:1734–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Constans M, Ssemadaali M, Kolyvushko O, Ramamoorthy S. Antigenic determinants of possible vaccine escape by porcine circovirus subtype 2b viruses. Bioinf Biol Insights. 2015;9(Suppl 2):1–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cai J, Xie X, Hu Y, Zhan Y, Yu W, Wang A, Wang N. Generation of PCV2 in PK15 cells transfected with recombinant baculovirus containing a 1.1 copy of the PCV2 genome. Acta Vet Hung. 2017;65(2):278–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tischer I, Peters D, Rasch R, Pociuli S. Replication of porcine circovirus: induction by glucosamine and cell cycle dependence. Arch Virol. 1987;96(1–2):39–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhan Y, Gong Q, Yu W, Deng Z, Wang A, Yang Y, Wang N. Generation of E. coli-derived virus-like particles of porcine circovirus type 2 and their use in an indirect IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Arch Virol. 2016;161(6):1485–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Guo LJ, Lu YH, Huang LP, Wei YW, Wu HL, Liu CM. First construction of infectious clone for newly emerging mutation porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) followed by comparison with PCV2a and PCV2b genotypes in biological characteristics in vitro. Virol J. 2011;8:291.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aboezz ZR, Mahsoub HM, El-Bagoury G, Pierson FW. In vitro growth kinetics and gene expression analysis of the Turkey adenovirus 3, a siadenovirus. Virus Res. 2019;263:47–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khayat R, Brunn N, Speir JA, Hardham JM, Ankenbauer RG, Schneemann A, Johnson JE. The 2.3-angstrom structure of porcine circovirus 2. J Virol. 2011;85(15):7856–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cheung AK. Rolling-circle replication of an animal circovirus genome in a theta-replicating bacterial plasmid in Escherichia coli. J Virol. 2006;80(17):8686–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fenaux M, Halbur PG, Haqshenas G, Royer R, Thomas P, Nawagitgul P, Gill M, Toth TE, Meng XJ. Cloned genomic DNA of type 2 porcine circovirus is infectious when injected directly into the liver and lymph nodes of pigs: characterization of clinical disease, virus distribution, and pathologic lesions. J Virol. 2002;76(2):541–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang WC, Zeng ZY, Tang DY, Liang HY, Liu Z, Dai ZJ. Construction of a novel porcine circovirus type 2 infectious clone as a basis for the development of a PCV2 iDNA vaccine. J Virol Methods. 2015;220:21–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shen HG, Halbur PG, Opriessnig T. Prevalence and phylogenetic analysis of the current porcine circovirus 2 genotypes after implementation of widespread vaccination programmes in the USA. J Gen Virol. 2012;93(Pt 6):1345–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Opriessnig T, Xiao CT, Gerber PF, Halbur PG, Matzinger SR, Meng XJ. Mutant USA strain of porcine circovirus type 2 (mPCV2) exhibits similar virulence to the classical PCV2a and PCV2b strains in caesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived pigs. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 11:2495–503.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jiang CG, Wang G, Tu YB, Liu YG, Wang SJ, Cai XH, An TQ. Genetic analysis of porcine circovirus type 2 in China. Arch Virol. 2017;162(9):2715–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Fenaux M, Opriessnig T, Halbur PG, Elvinger F, Meng XJ. Two amino acid mutations in the capsid protein of type 2 porcine circovirus (PCV2) enhanced PCV2 replication in vitro and attenuated the virus in vivo. J Virol. 2004;78(24):13440–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhang L, Wu X, Shi J, Peng Z, Zheng S, Xu S, Han H, Xin C, Liu Y, Gao M, et al. The correlation between the mutual deletions of amino acids within porcine circovirus rep protein and the discrepancy of replication. Microb Pathog. 2018;117:327–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fenaux M, Opriessnig T, Halbur PG, Meng XJ. Immunogenicity and pathogenicity of chimeric infectious DNA clones of pathogenic porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and nonpathogenic PCV1 in weanling pigs. J Virol. 2003;77(20):11232–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shi J, Peng Z, Fu F, Xu S, Xu S, Cong X, Yuan X, Yu J, Wu J, Sun W, et al. Mutant rep protein of the porcine circovirus type 2 N-glycosylation:23-25aa, 256-258aa mutation reduced virus replication but 286-288aa mutation enhanced virus replication in PK-15 cells. Vet Microbiol. 2015;177(3–4):370–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gibbs MJ, Weiller GF. Evidence that a plant virus switched hosts to infect a vertebrate and then recombined with a vertebrate-infecting virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(14):8022–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Mary Ann Conti for providing useful advice on the preparation and revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by: General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 31571432); Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2015JC3097). Support was also provided by “Shennong” Scholar funding to Aibing Wang.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Lab of Animal Models and Functional Genomics (LAMFG), The Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine & Protein Engineering, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University (HUNAU), Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Yi Hu, Xiaomin Yuan, Tanbin Liu, Lei Tan, Yalan Li, Lingchen Yang, Wei Liu & Aibing Wang

  2. Institute of Innovation and Applied Research in Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China

    Xiong Cai

  3. Lab of Functional Proteomics (LFP), The Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine & Protein Engineering, College of Veterinary Medicine, HUNAU, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Yang Zhan, Zhibang Deng, Naidong Wang & Yi Yang

  4. State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology and College of Pharmacy, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China

    Lijie Zhang

  5. College of Food Science and Technology, HUNAU, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Shiyin Guo

Authors
  1. Yi Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiong Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Zhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaomin Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tanbin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yalan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lijie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lingchen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhibang Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Naidong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Shiyin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Aibing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH conceived and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. AW and SG supervised the project and edited the manuscript. YZ, XY, TL, LT and LZ conducted part of the experiments. YL and LY analyzed part of the data. YY, NW, ZD, WL provided important suggestions. XC contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiyin Guo or Aibing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Cai, X., Zhan, Y. et al. Truncated Rep protein of porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) caused by a naturally occurring mutation reduced virus replication in PK15 cells. BMC Vet Res 15, 248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1984-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Porcine circovirus 2(PCV2)
  • Truncated Rep protein
  • Infectious clone
  • Rescued viruses
  • Virus replication
  • PCV2 evolution

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us