An epidemiological investigation of porcine circovirus 3 infection in cattle in Shandong province, China
BMC Veterinary Research volume 15, Article number: 60 (2019)
Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3) is a single-stranded, closed circular DNA virus, which causes porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS), multisystemic inflammation, and reproductive failure. The present study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of PCV3 in cattle (Bos taurus) in Shandong province, China, and examine its genome diversity.
PCR amplification and sequencing showed that 74 of 213 bovine samples (34.7%) were positive for PCV3. Among them, the capsid gene (n = 12) and the complete genome (n = 4) were sequenced. These sequences had high identities to the reference capsid gene (98.0–100%) and the complete genome (97.5–99.8%). The PCV3 strains were classified into two different genotypes (PCV3a and PCV3b), according to phylogenetic analysis based on the complete genome and capsid gene sequences. Specifically, the bovine-origin strains in this study were grouped into PCV3a, showing a close relationship with PCV3-US/SD2016 (American strain; GenBank: KX966193.1). Notably, a comparison of the inferred amino acid sequences revealed a mutation from D124 to Y124.
This was the first seroprevalence and genetic investigation of PCV3 in cattle in Shandong province, China. The results could provide insights into the epidemiology and pathogenesis of this important virus.
Porcine circovirus (PCV; Circovirus, Circoviridae) is a single-stranded, non-enveloped, closed circular DNA virus [1, 2]. PCV has been reported as one of the smallest viruses. Its genome contains two major open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2), encoding a replication-associated protein (Rep) and capsid protein (Cap), respectively . Specifically, Cap is a major structural protein, containing a number of cell epitopes that are associated with virus neutralization [4, 5].
Two major genotypes of PCV have been reported. Although Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) is considered non-pathogenic, Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was recognized as one of the main pathogen in PCV-associated disease (PCVAD) [6, 7]. Clinically, infection by PCV2 causes systemic, respiratory, and enteric manifestations in pigs, such as post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) and PDNS . In addition, PCV2 is capable of cross-species transmission and is associated with multiple diseases in cattle (including respiratory disease, a fatal hemorrhagic syndrome, and bovine neonatal pancytopenia). Globally, PCV2 infection has caused serious economic losses to the worldwide swine industry in the past fifty years.
Recently, a new species of the circovirus genus, PCV3, was detected in pigs with PDNS and PMWS in the USA , and subsequently in Poland, Germany, Brazil, and Italy [10,11,12,13]. In addition, this virus has become prevalent in many provinces and specific cities in China [14, 15]. Retrospective studies indicated that PCV3 infection could be traced back to 1996 . These data suggest that PCV3 is an emerging and important pathogenic virus for pigs, with a worldwide distribution.
PCV3 has been implicated in a range of diseases. High positive rates (85.7%, 12/14) of PCV3 were reported in pigs suffering from reproductive failure [9, 17, 18]. Currently, most researchers recognize that PCV3 is classified into two genotypes, PCV3a and PCV3b [19,20,21]. Recently, Jiang et al. confirmed a PDNS-like clinical disease reproduced by PCV3 infection alone, and further research suggested that PCV3 is more pathogenic for piglets than PCV2 . Surprisingly, recent works indicated that dogs could be infected by PCV3 . The results indicated that PCV3 could transmit to non-porcine hosts, possibly through cross-species transmission routes. Consequently, we became interested in understanding the seroprevalence of PCV3 in cattle (Bos taurus), preferably using a molecular approach that facilitates any necessary genetic analyses.
Screening for PCV3 prevalence in clinical samples
In this study, among the 213 bovine serum samples, 74 were detected as positive for PCV3, representing a 34.7% positive detection rate. In addition, samples from11 of the 13 (84.6%) cattle farms in Shandong province were positive for PCV3. The rates were 34.6% (9/26) positivity in Jinan, 32.3% (11/34) positivity in Dezhou, 44.4% (12/27) positivity in Weifang, 30.0% (6/20) positivity in Linyi, 29.6% (8/27) positivity in Zaozhuang, 53.1% (17/32) positivity in Yantai, 27.3%(6/22) positivity in Heze, and 20.0% (5/25) positivity in Jining (Fig. 1).
Multiple sequence alignment and analysis
Similar to the PCV2 genome, which has multiple sizes, the complete genome of PCV3 has been detected as two sizes: 1999 bp and 2000 bp [15, 19]. However, the four complete genomes (length = 2000 bp) sequenced in this study were similar to most previously isolated strains. In addition, 12 sequences of the capsid gene were determined. Multiple sequence alignment of these sequences showed 98.0–100% identity to the reference capsid gene sequence and 97.5–99.8% identity to the reference genome sequence. The alignment of the sequences among the PCV3 strains in this study showed that they shared 99.4 to 100% and 99.6 to 99.8% nucleotide similarity for the ORF2 gene and the complete genome, respectively.
Similar to previous reports, we detected six variant sequences of amino acids 24 to 27 of the Cap (VRRK, VRRR, ARRK, ARRR, ARKR, and LRRK); the vast majority of PCV3 strains are VRRK, with only the DE18.2 strains having ARKR and the DE5.15 strains having LRRK. Interestingly, a mutation was detected for the virus detected from cattle, compared with that isolated from pigs or dogs. Specifically, the inferred amino acid at position 124 (aspartic acid, D124) of the capsid protein detected in swine was mutated to tyrosine (Y124) in the virus detected in cattle (Fig. 2).
Phylogenetic analysis of PCV3
Based on their phylogenetic divergence, all the PCV3 strains can be classified into two different genotypes (PCV3a and PCV3b), and the strains in the present study were clustered in a branch representing PCV3a. Specifically, strains Shandong-01, 02, 03, and 04 had a close relationship to strain US/SD-2016, rather than strains detected in other parts of China (Fig. 3). The results revealed that PCV3a was prevalent in cattle in Shandong.
All types of farm animals (e.g., goats, cattle, camels, and chickens) and farm worker can be infected by circoviruses [2, 24, 25]. PCV2 is an important member of this family and is one of the major agents causing PCVAD, resulting in serious economic and production losses in the porcine industry [3,4,5,6,7,8]. PCV2 is capable of cross-species transmission to non-porcine hosts (for example, cattle, goats, rodents, and humans). PCV3 was first reported in 2016 and was detected in pigs with unexplained cardiac and multi-organ inflammation in the USA . Recent research has confirmed that PCV3 is associated with multiple clinical diseases in infected pigs. Retrospective studies also showed that PCV3 strains collected between 1996 and 2017 had a high degree of genetic stability . Surprisingly, recent works indicated that dogs could be infected by PCV3 , which suggested that the virus might also be propagated in hosts other than its natural host (pigs). These observations prompted us to speculate that similar to PCV2, PCV3 could be transmitted to cattle. In this study, the molecular epidemiological investigation results confirmed that PCV3 was prevalent in cattle in Shandong province, China.
PCV3 had been reported to be prevalent in at least seven countries, including America, Poland, German, and Italy [10, 12]. Especially, the prevalence of this virus was extensively reported in China, including many provinces and specific cities. Recent epidemiological surveillance data showed that a rate of PCV3 infection between 19.1 and 39.4% in different provinces (or cities) of China [14,15,16, 23]. In the present study, limited numbers of samples for detection may have resulted in the high prevalence in Yantai (53.1%) and low prevalence in Jinning (20%). Overall, the positive rates of PCV3 were 34.7% (74/213) in cattle in Shandong province, China.
Currently, there is a debate concerning the classification of PCV3. Overall, most research has divided PCV3 into two genotypes [14, 16, 18], from which, Li et al. used maximum likelihood (ML), maximum clade credibility (MCC), and neighbor joining (NJ) methods to reconstruct the phylogenies of PCV3 complete coding sequences, which were stably divided into two clades [20, 21]. In the present study, we used the methods detailed by Li et al., which also divided PCV3 into two different genotypes, PCV3a and PCV3b. At the same time, by combining genetic evolution analysis with amino acid sequence analysis, it was found that the 24th to the 27th amino acid sequence VRRR and most of VRRK were found mainly in PCV3a, and the amino acid sequences ARRK, ARKR, and ARRR are found mainly in PCV3b (Fig. 3). However, we encountered the same problem that adding more reference sequences for the ORF2 gene led to non-identical phylogenies. Therefore, we suggest using the whole genome sequences for PCV3 genotyping.
In circoviruses, Cap is not only the sole structural protein, but also contains immunologically important epitopes associated with virus neutralization. Therefore, it has been the main target for vaccine and diagnostic test development . Multiple commercial vaccines against PCV2 have been introduced worldwide, which have been considered as a success story in veterinary vaccinology. However, the Cap of PCV3 and PCV2 share only approximately 30% amino acid identity . Thus, cross protection seems unlikely. In previous reports, the amino acid at position 206 of the Cap mutated from lysine (V) to alanine (A) in dogs . A similar mutation has been reported previously. Tyrosine at position 124 (Y124) of the Cap was only found in the bovine-origin PCV3 strains, whereas D124 was strictly conserved among all reference strains derived from dogs and pigs, based on all entries in the GenBank database. However, the limited reference sequence information in public databases makes it difficult to determine whether residue Y124 is truly a genetic marker to differentiate bovine-origin PCV3 from pig or dog-origin PCV3; thus, further research is required.
This study reports is the first detection of PCV3 in cattle. Our results and those of previous reports indicate the possible transmission of PCV3 to non-porcine hosts, which might involve cross-species transmission. Notably, a comparison of the inferred amino acid sequences revealed a mutation from D124 to Y124 in the Cap. Further research is needed to determine the prevalence and pathogenesis of this virus in cattle, which would be useful to determine the possible origin and transmission route.
From 2015 to 2017, serum samples (n = 213) of cows without clinical symptoms were collected from 13 cattle farms in Jinan, Yantai, Weifang, Linyi, Zaozhuang, Jining, Heze, and Dezhou in Shandong Province, China (Fig. 1). This study received animal ethics approval (No. Xidakezi2000138) from Guangxi University (see Ethics approval and consent to participate).
DNA isolation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
DNA was extracted from these serum samples using a TIANamp Virus DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two primer pairs were designed based on sequences of the Chongqing-148/2016 strain (Accession no. KY075991.1) (Table 1). The PCR reaction mixture contained 1.5 μL of extracted DNA, 1 μL of primer pairs (10 μM), 12.5 μL PCR Master Mix (TIANGEN), and 10 μL of RNase-free water. The PCR amplification conditions were as follows: predenaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 65 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; and then a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated using a 1% agarose gel for purification, and then inserted into the pMD19-T vector after gel extraction. The recombined vectors were amplified in Escherichia coli DH5α and extracted for sequencing.
Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
The ORF2 gene and the genome sequences of PCV3 obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MH107148–MH107159 and MH107161–MH107165, respectively. Reference genome sequence for PCV3 was obtained from NCBI (Table 2). Multiple sequence alignments were carried out using ClustalW within the Megalign program (DNAStar software) and the phylogenetic relationships were determined using the maximum likelihood method and visualized with the MEGA software (version 7). Support for the phylogenetic relationships was determined by bootstrapping 1000 replicates. In the present study, the method described by Li et al. was used to divide clades of PCV3 [19,20,21].
Maximum clade credibility
Porcine circovirus disease
Porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome
Post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome
Chen Y, Sun J, Tong X, Xu J, Deng H, Jiang Z, Jiang C, Duan J, Li J, Zhou P, et al. First analysis of synonymous codon usage in porcine circovirus. Arch Virol. 2014;159(8):2145–51.
Rosario K, Breitbart M, Harrach B, Segales J, Delwart E, Biagini P, Varsani A. Revisiting the taxonomy of the family Circoviridae: establishment of the genus Cyclovirus and removal of the genus Gyrovirus. Arch Virol. 2017;162(5):1447–63.
Lv QZ, Guo KK, Zhang YM. Current understanding of genomic DNA of porcine circovirus type 2. Virus Genes. 2014;49(1):1–10.
Lekcharoensuk P, Morozov I, Paul PS, Thangthumniyom N, Wajjawalku W, Meng XJ. Epitope mapping of the major capsid protein of type 2 porcine circovirus (PCV2) by using chimeric PCV1 and PCV2. J Virol. 2004;78(15):8135–45.
Walia R, Dardari R, Chaiyakul M, Czub M. Porcine circovirus-2 capsid protein induces cell death in PK15 cells. Virology. 2014;468-470:126–32.
Tischer I, Rasch R, Tochtermann G. Characterization of papovavirus-and picornavirus-like particles in permanent pig kidney cell lines. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1974;226(2):153–67.
Opriessnig T, Meng XJ, Halbur PG. Porcine circovirus type 2 associated disease: update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2007;19(6):591–615.
Harding JCS, Clark EG. Recognizing and diagnosing postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Swine Health Prod. 1997;5(5):201–3.
Palinski R, Pineyro P, Shang P, Yuan F, Guo R, Fang Y, Byers E, Hause BM. A novel porcine circovirus distantly related to known circoviruses is associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome and reproductive failure. J Virol. 2017;91(1).
Stadejek T, Woźniak A, Miłek D, Biernacka K. First detection of porcine circovirus type 3 on commercial pig farms in Poland. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017.
Fux R, Sockler C, Link EK, Renken C, Krejci R, Sutter G, Ritzmann M, Eddicks M. Full genome characterization of porcine circovirus type 3 isolates reveals the existence of two distinct groups of virus strains. Virol J. 2018;15(1):25.
Franzo G, Legnardi M, Hjulsager CK, Klaumann F, Larsen LE, Segales J, Drigo M. Full-genome sequencing of porcine circovirus 3 field strains from Denmark, Italy and Spain demonstrates a high within-Europe genetic heterogeneity. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(3):602–6.
Tochetto C, Lima DA, Varela APM, Loiko MR, Paim WP, Scheffer CM, Herpich JI, Cerva C, Schmitd C, Cibulski SP, et al. Full-genome sequence of porcine circovirus type 3 recovered from serum of sows with stillbirths in Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):5–9.
Shen H, Liu X, Zhang P, Wang L, Liu Y, Zhang L, Liang P, Song C. Genome characterization of a porcine circovirus type 3 in South China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):264–6.
Wen S, Sun W, Li Z, Zhuang X, Zhao G, Xie C, Zheng M, Jing J, Xiao P, Wang M, et al. The detection of porcine circovirus 3 in Guangxi, China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):27–31.
Sun J, Wei L, Lu Z, Mi S, Bao F, Guo H, Tu C, Zhu Y, Gong W. Retrospective study of porcine circovirus 3 infection in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018.
Saraiva GL, Vidigal PMP, Fietto JLR, Bressan GC, Silva Júnior A, de Almeida MR. Evolutionary analysis of porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3) indicates an ancient origin for its current strains and a worldwide dispersion. Virus Genes. 2018.
Phan TG, Giannitti F, Rossow S, Marthaler D, Knutson TP, Li L, Deng X, Resende T, Vannucci F, Delwart E. Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation. Virol J. 2016;13(1):184.
Ha Z, Xie CZ, Li JF, Wen SB, Zhang KL, Nan FL, Zhang H, Guo YC, Wang W, Lu HJ, et al. Molecular detection and genomic characterization of porcine circovirus 3 in pigs from Northeast China. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14(1):321.
Li G, He W, Zhu H, Bi Y, Wang R, Xing G, Zhang C, Zhou J, Yuen KY, Gao GF, et al. Origin, genetic diversity, and evolutionary dynamics of novel porcine circovirus 3. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2018;5(9):1800275.
Li G, Wang H, Wang S, Xing G, Zhang C, Zhang W, Liu J, Zhang J, Su S, Zhou J. Insights into the genetic and host adaptability of emerging porcine circovirus 3. Virulence. 2018;9(1):1301–13.
Jiang H, Wang D, Wang J, Zhu S, She R, Ren X, Tian J, Quan R, Hou L, Li Z, et al. Induction of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome in piglets by infection with porcine circovirus type 3. J Virol. 2018.
Zhang J, Liu Z, Zou Y, Zhang N, Wang D, Tu D, Yang L, Deng Z, Yang Y, Jiang P, et al. First molecular detection of porcine circovirus type 3 in dogs in China. Virus Genes. 2018;54(1):140–4.
Zhai SL, Zhou X, Lin T, Zhang H, Wen XH, Zhou XR, Jia CL, Tu D, Zhu XL, Chen QL, et al. Reappearance of buffalo-origin-like porcine circovirus type 2 strains in swine herds in southern China. New Microbes New Infect. 2017;17:98–100.
Li L, Kapoor A, Slikas B, Bamidele OS, Wang C, Shaukat S, Masroor MA, Wilson ML, Ndjango JB, Peeters M, et al. Multiple diverse circoviruses infect farm animals and are commonly found in human and chimpanzee feces. J Virol. 2010;84(4):1674–82.
We would like to thank Ningning Hu for her assistance with reagent preparation. We would also like to thank Guangxu Ma for editing the manuscript.
This work was supported by the following Grants: the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant numbers 2017YFD0500101 and 2016YFD0500401), and the Technologies R & D Program of Jilin Province (Grant number 20140309024NY). The funding body was solely involved in funding and had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Bovine serum samples used in this study were obtained from the Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the experiment was approved by the Animal Welfare and the Animal Experimental Ethical Committee (Guangxi University, No. Xidakezi2000138). Written consent for the use of samples before participation in the study was obtained from the cattle’s owners.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Sun, W., Cao, L. et al. An epidemiological investigation of porcine circovirus 3 infection in cattle in Shandong province, China. BMC Vet Res 15, 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1793-0
- Porcine circovirus type 3
- Phylogenetic analysis