Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Development and evaluation of an interferon gamma assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in red deer experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 4,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile and
  • 1
Contributed equally
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:341

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1262-6

Received: 1 December 2016

Accepted: 9 November 2017

Published: 16 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Red deer (Cervus elaphus) is regarded as an epidemiologically relevant host for Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) and closely related members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex that cause animal tuberculosis (TB). The standard antemortem screening test for the detection of TB in deer is the intradermal tuberculin skin test, but the detection of interferon-gamma (IFNγ) produced by white blood cells exposed to M. bovis antigens can be used as an alternative or supplemental assay in most TB eradication/control programs. This study aims to develop an in-house sandwich ELISA for deer IFNγ, based on the cross-reactivity of the antibodies to both cervid and bovine IFNγ, and to evaluate the potential of this assay to detect M. bovis-infected red deer in response to the in vitro stimulation of whole-blood cells with bovine purified protein derivative (bPPD), p22 protein complex derived from bPPD or using the specific tuberculous mycobacterial proteins ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c. The positive control stimulant used in this study was pokeweed mitogen, which resulted in a consistent induction of IFNγ in samples from red deer, thus allowing the interpretation of the assay.

Results

The percentage of animals correctly classified by this technique as M. bovis non-infected was 100%. The detection of infected animals as positive was high and ranged widely depending upon the antigen and the cut-off value applied, as well as the time after infection. Our findings indicate that this protocol may serve as a reliable assay for the antemortem diagnosis of TB from the initial stage of M. bovis-infection, and may also be adequately sensitive.

Conclusions

The suggested optimal antigens and cut-off are bPPD, p22 and the combination of ESAT-6/CFP-10 and Rv3020c with a 0.05 Δ optical density, which yielded a up to 100% correct classification of TB positive and negatve red deer under our experimental conditions. This technique will aid in TB testing of farmed and translocated deer. Future studies should evaluate the ability of this IFNγ assay to detect specific responses under field conditions.

Keywords

  • Animal tuberculosis
  • Cellular immune response
  • Farmed Cervus elaphus
  • In vivo test
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

Background

Animal tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) has been identified in a wide range of hosts, including both domestic animals and wildlife, which can become reservoirs of infection and contribute to infection maintenance [1]. This disease has a worldwide distribution and is still a major infectious disease among the domestic animals and wildlife in many countries [24]. The eradication of TB in cattle is based on diagnosing infection through the intradermal tuberculin test and the slaughter of infected animals or whole herds [5].

The red deer (Cervus elaphus) is considered an epidemiologically important wildlife host for M. bovis and closely related members of the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) that cause TB [1]. Red deer are also hosts of M. avium paratuberculosis, which causes paratuberculosis (PTB) or Johne’s disease. These two diseases, TB and PTB, are a priority in the management and sanitary control of farmed deer [68]. Deer farming is a growing activity in Spain, since the animals produced are used to restock estates on which they are subsequently hunted [9]. Pre-movement tests are currently compulsory for the translocations of live deer in Spain.

Serological tests have been developed and employed to detect antibodies to M. bovis antigens in deer, but no assay has to date proven to have an adequate sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) for routine TB diagnosis in deer [1013]. The poor performance of this diagnostic approach can be attributed to the immunological response generated in ruminants infected with M. bovis, with a minor involvement of the humoral response which is initially counterbalanced by a more effective cell-mediated immune response (CMI) [14], widely recognized as the main factor involved in the containment of the infection [15]. TB diagnosis should, therefore, be based on the evaluation of CMI, which can be determined using the tuberculin skin test or, alternatively, interferon-gamma (IFNγ) release assays [16].

The standard antemortem screening test for TB detection in farmed deer is the intradermal tuberculin skin test, a diagnostic method designated by the World Organization for Animal Health [17] which is used worldwide. This test consists of the inoculation of purified protein derivative tuberculin (PPD) to measure the increase in the cervical skin fold thickness induced by a single inoculation of PPD prepared from M. bovis (bPPD) (single cervical skin-test, SCST). Another valid technique is the comparative cervical skin test (CCST), which consists of also injecting avian PPD, prepared from M. avium ssp. avium (aPPD) into a separate site in order to allow a comparative assessment of the skin fold increase [18, 19].

As an alternative or supplemental assay to the skin test, in most TB eradication/control programs the CMI response can also be measured in vitro by an assay that detects the IFNγ produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) exposed to M. bovis antigens [20, 21]. The IFNγ test has proven to be the best option, since this cytokine is thought to be involved in immunity to mycobacterial infections and is released in vitro, and thus readily measurable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [2022]. This assay has been accepted for use as an ancillary test to the intradermal test in the European Union since 2002 [Council Directive 64/ 432/EEC, amended by (EC) 1226/2002], as it provides national TB control programs and industry with an additional tool for use in curtailing the spread of TB in cattle and other Bovidae [16, 23]. The European Commission recently requested the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to issue a scientific opinion on the suitability of the IFNγ test for its inclusion in Directive 64/432/EEC as an official primary or stand-alone test and as an equivalent to the intradermal test employed to define the infectious status [24].

When compared to the skin test, the IFNγ avoids the continuous stimulation of the animal with PPDs, does not require the animal to be captured twice and prevents the technical variability associated with assessing skin test reactions [16, 23, 25]. In cattle, the IFNγ test has an increased Se with a slightly lower Sp than the intradermal tuberculin test [26, 27]. The Se and Sp of the IFNγ assay are estimated at 85 to 100% and 70 to 93%, respectively, with the use of bPPDs [23, 25, 2729]. bPPDs consist of a complex mixture of proteins and include a great variety of antigens, many of which are shared with other mycobacterial species and closely related bacteria, something that may lead to a lack of Sp [30, 31]. Specific antigens, which are present in tuberculous mycobacteria and not in non-tuberculous mycobacteria or M. bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), can be used for blood stimulation in the IFNγ assay in tests that discriminate between M. avium-exposed and BCG vaccinated individuals [28, 3235], increasing the Sp of these diagnostic tests [25, 2729, 36]. Several antigens have been described as potential diagnostic targets (e.g. ESAT-6/CFP-10, MPB70, MPB83, Rv3615c or Rv3020c) for skin testing, IFNγ assay or antibody response assessment in domestic livestock and wild animals [27, 3640].

An assay was designed to detect the IFNγ produced by red deer leukocytes (Cervigam; Pfizer Animal Health) that also reacts with the IFNγ produced by reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and other deer species leukocytes, indicating that antibodies within the assay are cross-reactive with the IFNγ produced in these different species [35, 41]. The in vitro measurement of IFNγ production, such as in the Cervigam assay, served as a useful test for the antemortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in Cervidae [41, 42]. However, this product is not currently commercially available, and it is therefore necessary to develop an alternative protocol suitable for cervids.

Since red deer are, from a taxonomic point of view, closely related to bovines, many of the tests developed for bovines used previously in cattle have also been described to work in deer. In particular, the high amino acid sequence homology between Bos taurus and Cervus elaphus IFNγ (91%, http://www.uniprot.org) made it likely that antibodies recognising bovine IFNγ would cross-react wtih cervid IFNγ. This study was designed to develop an in-house sandwich ELISA for the detection of cervid IFNγ in red deer, based on the cross-reactivity of the antibodies specific to bovine IFNγ, and to evaluate the potential of this assay to detect M. bovis-infected deer in response to the in vitro stimulation of whole-blood cells with bPPD, p22 protein complex derived from bPPD and aPPD or using specific M. bovis proteins, such as ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c or Rv3020c.

Methods

Animals and experimental design

Fifteen 7–8 month-old female red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves were obtained from a TB-free red deer farm in southern Spain (no positive cases and the use of CCST and bacterial isolation since 2003). All individuals were tested using ELISA to confirm their MTC antibody-free status before the study started. The animals were housed in a class III bio-containment at the NEIKER institute in Derio (Spain), where the calves were allowed to adapt for 1 week before starting the study and had ad libitum food and water.

An experimental infection with M. bovis was carried out as part of a vaccine trial [43]. For the challenge, a M. bovis field strain (2008/2575) was propagated in Middlebrook 7H9 broth containing 10% OADC Enrichment (Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA), 0.2% glycerol and 0.05% Tween 80 (v/v). Bacterial growth was harvested by means of centrifugation, washed twice and thoroughly re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.2% glycerol and 0.05% Tween 80. Bacterial concentration was calculated by plating serial dilutions on agar-solidified Middlebrook 7H9 and adjusted to 106 colony forming units (CFU)/ml. The suspension was stored at −80 °C until used. The animals were sedated with xylazine (Xilagesic 2%; Laboratorios Calier, Barcelona, Spain) and the inoculum containing 106 CFU of M. bovis in 10 ml of sterile PBS was administered by intratracheal injection with an 18 G needle.

Blood samples were collected at different time points during the experiment, including prior to the challenge (day 0), fifteen days post-inoculation (15 dpi), one month after challenge (30 dpi) and on the day of the necropsy (60 dpi).

The animals were sedated with xylazine (Xilagesic 2%) and euthanized by means of an intravenous injection of T-61 (Intervet S.A., Salamanca, Spain) at 60 dpi following the manufacturer’s instructions. All euthanized calves were subjected to a systematic necropsy with the main objective of assessing the presence and extension of tuberculous lesions. Samples were collected from head lymphoid tissues, including oropharyngeal tonsil and mandibular, parotid and retropharyngeal lymph nodes (LNs), lung, tracheobronchial and mediastinal LNs, spleen, ileocaecal valve and mesenteric and hepatic LNs. Liver, kidneys and LNs from other locations were sampled when suspicious lesions had been observed in these organs. The samples were placed individually in sterile bags and stored at −80 °C until the bacteriological culture took place.

Microbiology

Samples of tissues for the culture of mycobacteria were thoroughly homogenized in sterile distilled water (2 g in 10 ml or equivalently). Five ml of this suspension were decontaminated and processed following the manufacturer’s instructions in order to inoculate BBL MGIT tubes supplemented with BBL MGIT PANTA and BACTEC MGIT growth supplement (Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA). BBL tubes were incubated for 42 days in a BACTEC MGIT 960 System. The remaining 5 ml were decontaminated in hexadecyl-pyridinium chloride at a final concentration of 0.75% (w/v) for 12–18 h. The samples were centrifuged at 2500 × g for 5 min and the pellets cultured in Coletsos (bioMèrieux, Madrid, Spain) and Lowenstein-Jensen with pyruvate (Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Company) tubes at 37 °C for 4 months. All isolates were spoligotyped in order to confirm the strain [44].

Serum antibody detection

Sera obtained by centrifugation (3000 × g for 10 min) from blood samples at 0, 15, 30 and 60 dpi were tested in duplicate. We applied an in-house ELISA with some modifications was described previously by Boadella et al. [45], using bovine PPD (CZ Veterinaria SL, Lugo, Spain) as an antigen and protein G horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich Química SA, Madrid, Spain) as a conjugate. Sample results were expressed as an ELISA percentage (E%) that was calculated using the following formula: [sample E% = (mean sample optical density (OD) / 2 × mean of negative control OD) × 100]. The cut-off values were defined as the ratio of the mean sample OD to the double of mean OD of the negative control. Serum samples with E% values greater than 100 were considered positive.

IFNγ test

Blood samples were collected in tubes with lithium heparin at 0, 15, 30 and 60 dpi and processed at room temperature within the following 8 h. Blood samples were dispensed in aliquots into individual wells of a 24-well plate (Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA) with each antigen/control. Stimulation of whole blood was performed with aPPD (20 μg/ml), bPPD (20 μg/ml), a protein complex named p22 (20 μg/ml), and cocktails of synthetic peptides spanning the full sequences of early secretory antigenic target-6 kDa and culture filtrate protein 10 (ESAT-6/CFP-10; 5 μg/ml for each peptide; AHVLA), Rv3615c (5 μg/ml each peptide) and Rv3020c (5 μg/ml per peptide). The peptides cocktails were kindly provided by Drs G. Jones and M. Vordermeier (APHA) [46]. Pokeweed mitogen (PWM; 20 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Spain) was used as a positive control, while no stimulation (PBS) was employed as a negative control. The protocol was performed as described for other species [47, 48]. Blood cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified incubator (5% CO2). Plasma was harvested after 24 h and stored at −20 °C until assayed.

The IFNγ levels in non-stimulated and stimulated plasma were determined using an in-house sandwich ELISA that specifically detects this soluble cytokine using commercially available monoclonal antibody (mAbs) pairs for bovine IFNγ (Serotec, Oxford, UK). Microplates (Nunc Maxisorb, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 50 μl of highly purified anti-IFNγ Abs at 5 μg/ml in PBS (pH 7.5) and incubated at 4 °C overnight. After a blocking step with 75 μl of PBS, 0.05% Tween-20 and 2% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature, the plates were washed 3 times with PBS/Tween-20 and incubated with 50 μl of plasma diluted 1:2 for 1 h at 37 °C. The plates were then washed 3 times and incubated with 50 μl of biotinylated anti-IFNγ Abs at 5 μg/ml for 1 h at room temperature. This was followed by another washing step and the addition of 50 μl of streptavidin–peroxidase (1,2000; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) for 45 min at room temperature. After a final wash, 100 μl of chromogenic substrate (Fast OPD, Sigma-Aldrich, Spain) were added and the reaction was stopped with 50 μl of 3 N H2SO4. The OD was measured in a spectrophotometer at 450 nm. Optimal concentrations of mAbs were determined by evaluating the responses to 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 μg/ml of each Ab. Individual samples were analyzed in duplicate and the assay was repeated if the duplicate responses were not consistent. The data were presented as OD readings or as differences between the response to antigen or mitogen and the response to PBS (Δ OD). Results for a given sample were only validated when PWM Δ OD was higher than or equal to 0.5 and low OD readouts were obtained in non-stimulated wells (PBS wells).

IFNγ test was performed by an experienced researcher but with no previous knowledge of which sample was being analyzed. The interpretation of the responses was based on methods commonly used in the Spanish National Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program for Bovigam assay and in the former commercial Cervigam assay. The responses to the bPPD and p22 must exceed the responses to both aPPD and PBS by a given cut-off (0.1 or 0.05 Δ OD) to be considered positive. The responses to the specific antigens (ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c) were compared with the responses to PBS.

M. bovis proteins selection

bPPD consists of a complex mixture of proteins from M. bovis and includes a great variety of antigens, being the most common antigen used for in vitro IFNγ assays [27]. Recently, a new immunopurified subcomplex protein named as P22 was purified by affinity chromatography from bPPD (CZ Veterinaria SL, Porriño, Spain), and could become a solid alternative to bPPD for detecting antibodies against MTC. P22 is composed of several antigens including MPB83, ESAT-6, CFP-10 and, especially MPB70. It improves standardization and reproducibility by different laboratories (patent EP16382579).

ESAT-6 and CFP-10 are two of the major antigenic targets identified in both cattle and human MTC [49, 50]. These proteins are absent in BCG vaccine strains [51] and can therefore serve as targets for differentiating vaccinated from infected animals (DIVA test) [52]. The cocktail ESAT-6/CFP-10 supports the notion that a combination of epitopes of different antigens increases the diagnostic Se without compromising Sp [36, 53]. The antigen Rv3615c can also be used in combination with ESAT-6/CFP-10 (PC-HP, Prionics, Schlieren, Switzerland) or alone, detecting a significant portion of TB infected animals that were negative to the ESAT-6/CFP-10 peptides cocktail [54] or recognizing a significant proportion (37%) of infected animals but not in BCG vaccinates [39]. Moreover, Jones et al. demonstrated that the antigen Rv3020c also induced IFNγ production in whole blood from M. bovis-infected animals but not from BCG-vaccinated cattle [45]. Both candidate antigens have been tested for their DIVA capabilities and showed promising results when used as antigens in the BOVIGAM® assay as well as for skin testing [5557].

Statistical analyses

ELISA data were analyzed by means of a one-way variance analysis followed by a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. This approach was followed to test for statistical differences in ELISA values through time. The t-test was employed to search for statistical differences in IFNγ levels (OD) in the different times post-inoculation with regard to 0 dpi for any of the mycobacterial antigens, mitogen and negative control used to stimulate IFNγ production. Pearson’s product-moment correlations were computed between the IFNγ levels in plasma stimulated with different antigens. Concordance between the IFNγ test and antibody levels to bPPD measured using ELISA was calculated by means of Cohen’s κ coefficient. Statistical analyses were run on GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

The animals were observed daily throughout the experiment and clinical signs of TB were detected, including those of depression, cough, dyspnoea and open-mouth breathing. The intratracheal inoculation of M. bovis in the deer resulted in gross tuberculosis lesions in every animal, which were especially prominent in lung, tracheobronchial and mediastinal LNs. A bacteriological culture confirmed M. bovis infection in all the animals and spoligotyping confirmed the only presence of the administered M. bovis strain.

ELISA responses to bPPD of infected deer were low before and immediately after (15dpi) infection but increased thereafter progresively up to 60 dpi (p < 0.05), when 70% of the infected animals were tested as positive to the disease with this technique (mean of 121%, with a cut-off equal to or greater than 100%) (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1. Table S1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Individual red deer antibody levels (in ELISA percentage, E%) to bovine purified protein derivative (bPPD) measured by using ELISA immediately before and until 60 days post-inoculation of M. bovis. Serum samples with E% values greater than 100 were considered positive (horizontal grey line). *Significant differences (p < 0.05) between pre-inoculation values and those from different post-inoculation time points

The stimulation of whole-blood cultures with PWM after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C led to responses of IFNγ in plasma that exceeded an OD of 0.5 at every time point tested. The production of IFNγ increased significantly during the course of the study (0.5 at the time of inoculation when compared to 0.88 at 30 dpi; p < 0.05) (Fig. 2), but some of the animals became less responsive to PWM (PWM OD < 0.5) at 60 dpi. However, controls (PBS) were consistently low throughout the experiment (OD, 0.20 ± 0.018), and we found no alterations after infecting the deer with M. bovis (Fig. 2 and Additional file 2. Table S2).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

IFNγ responses in plasma from heparinized blood stimulated in M. bovis-infected red deer (n = 15) presented as mean (±SD) of the optical density at 450 nm (OD450nm) to Pokeweed mitogen (PWM), negative control (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS), bovine and avian purified protein derivatives (PPD), p22; early secretory antigenic target-6 kDa and culture filtrate protein 10 (ESAT-6/CFP-10), Rv3615c and Rv3020c. *Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) observed at specific time points since M. bovis infection in comparison to pre-inoculation values

As early as 15 dpi, and at most time points thereafter until the completion of the study (60 dpi), the IFNγ responses of the infected deer to bPPD and p22 significantly exceeded those prior to the challenge (p < 0.05), peaking at 30 dpi (0.88 for bPPD and 0.67 for p22; p < 0.001). Several specific antigens produced by pathogenic mycobacteria of the M. tuberculosis complex but not by environmental or non-M. tuberculosis complex pathogens were evaluated as an approach to decrease the detection likelihood of false positive animals. We observed that whole blood samples stimulated with ESAT-6/CFP-10 and Rv3020c significantly increased the levels of IFNγ after M. bovis challenge during the course of the experiment (p < 0.05). This was not the case for Rv3615c, which induced signficantly elevated responses only at 15 dpi (p < 0.05;Fig. 2). The ESAT-6/CFP-10 and Rv3020c responses followed kinetics similar to those shown by PPDs and PWM, peaking at 30 dpi and dropping slightly at 60 dpi. The responses of IFNγ to aPPD differed at 30 and 60 dpi, but only increased by 0.2 in OD when compared with the pre-infection levels (Fig. 2).

The mean IFNγ responses (averaged over various time points) of infected deer to different mycobacterial antigens with regard to PBS in whole-blood were also evaluated. At the time of infection, the OD values for mycobacterial antigen stimulation were very low and similar to those of PBS. There were no significant differences at this time, with the exception of IFNγ levels in response to PWM (p < 0.05). The responses in samples stimulated with aPPD, Rv3615c and Rv3020c remained low during the course of the study and were not statistically different from PBS (p < 0.05) after infection, with the exception of an increase to Rv3020c at 30 dpi. However, the IFNγ responses of infected deer were higher at all time points after stimulation with either PWM, bPPD, p22 and ESAT-6/CFP-10 as compared to those with PBS, and there were statistically significant changes in all the antigens tested (p < 0.001). The mean IFNγ responses decreased only slightly at 60 days after M. bovis infection.

The interpretation of the responses to different antigens was based on protocols commonly used for the Bovigam assay in cattle or other farmed bovines. The responses to bPPD and p22 must be higher to both aPPD and PBS responses by 0.1 or 0.05 ΔOD to be considered positive. The responses to the specific antigens (ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c) were compared to PBS (OD > 0.05 or 0.1). In order to evaluate the nonspecific responses to M. bovis antigens in non-infected deer, samples were collected from the TB-free deer before M. bovis inoculation (n = 15) and the production of IFNγ in response to mycobacterial antigens and mitogen was measured. All deer had responses to PWM (OD > 0.5); however, none of them had a response to mycobacterial antigens, independently of the cut-off value (data not shown).

Only results in which the control mitogen responses exceeded OD values of 0.5 were used for the evaluation of the test. Only 10 animals had PWM responses that exceeded 0.5 ΔOD at 60 dpi. Table 1 shows the differences in the percentage of positive samples to the IFNγ assay regarding M. bovis-infected deer depending on the time post-infection, the antigen used or the cut-off value. The differences in test Se were therefore detected at different times of infection for every mycobacterial antigen analyzed with both cut-off points. We observed a higher proportion of positive samples at 30 dpi, which decreased considerably at necropsy time (60 dpi), when the number of animals with a response to the mitogen also declined. In the earlier stages of infection, a higher proportion of positive samples was obtained with bPPD, p22 and ESAT-6/CFP-10 (85% to 92.8% Se at 15 dpi and 85% to 100% Se at 30 dpi) when compared to Rv3615c and Rv3020c (40% to 66.6% Se at 15 dpi and 26.6% to 100% Se at 30 dpi). The specific antigens ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c are usually applied in parallel, and a test is thus positive if an animal responds to one of these cocktails. The evaluation in parallel of ESAT-6/CFP-10 with Rv3615c and Rv3020c considerably increased the Se of the technique when compared to the separate use of these antigens. At a cut-off value of 0.1 there were more differences between antigens but the detection of animals infected with M. bovis by the test was lower, whereas smaller differences and a higher percentage of infected animals were found when using 0.05 as the cut-off for the assay (Table 1).
Table 1

Percentage (%) of positive samples to IFNγ assay (95% Wilson’s confidence intervals) from M. bovis-infected deer

 

15 dpi

30 dpi

60 dpi

 

< 0.1 (%)

< 0.05 (%)

< 0.1 (%)

< 0.05 (%)

< 0.1 (%)

< 0.05 (%)

bPPD

92.8 (68.5–98.7)

92.8 (68.5–98.7)

100 (79.6–100)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

75 (40.9–92.9)

P22

85.7 (60.1–96)

92.8 (68.5–98.7)

100 (79.6–100)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

87.5 (52.9–97.8)

ESAT-6/CFP-10

92.3 (66.7–98.6)

92.3 (66.7–98.6)

85.7 (60.1–96)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

75 (40.9–92.9)

Rv3615c

40 (19.8–64.3)

40 (19.8–64.3)

26.6 (10.9–52)

26.6 (10.9–52)

25 (7.1–59.1)

37.5 (13.7–69.4)

Rv3020c

53.3 (41.7–84.8)

66.6 (30.1–75.2)

73.3 (48–89.1)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

87.5 (52.9–97.8)

ESAT-6/CFP-10 + Rv3615c

92.3 (66.7–98.6)

92.3 (66.7–98.6)

86.6 (62.1–96.3)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

87.5 (52.9–97.8)

ESAT-6/CFP-10 + Rv3020c

93.3 (70.2–98.8)

93.3 (70.2–98.8)

100 (79.6–100)

100 (79.6–100)

75 (40.9–92.9)

87.5 (52.9–97.8)

IFNγ interferon gamma, bPPD bovine purified protein derivative, ESAT-6/CFP-10 early secretory antigenic target-6 kDa and culture filtrate protein 10; dpi: days post-infection

IFNγ responses to PWM, bPPD, aPPD, p22 and ESAT-6/CFP-10 were strongly correlated in M. bovis-infected deer (p < 0.001). The correlations between the responses to Rv3615c, Rv3020c and the other mycobacterial antigens were moderately positive (p < 0.05) (Additional file 3. Table S3).

The agreement (kappa value) reported between the IFN-γ assays and the antibody levels to bPPD measured using ELISA depended on the time post-infection, the antigen used and the cut-off value applied (Additional file 4. Table S4). The agreement between these techniques was 0 at the early stage of the disease, regardless of the cut-off value applied. Thereafter, the agreement between both techniques increased for all the antigens when micobacterial antibodies were produced, except in the case of Rv3615c. At necropsy time, the agreement obtained between the IFN-γ assay and ELISA for bPPD antibodies analyzed with the cut-off detailed in Spanish guidelines (0.05) varied from good to very good (0.73 < k < 0.86) in the case of all the antigens used, with the exception of Rv3615c, and good values of proportion of positive samples were maintained with this IFN-γ test (Table 1).

Discussion

The main goal of this study was to assess the ability of an in-house sandwich ELISA to detect the IFNγ produced by M. bovis-infected deer in response to in vitro stimulation with bPPD, p22 and aPPD or using specific M. bovis proteins, such as ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c or Rv3020c.

The development of IFNγ assays is an important advance in the diagnosis of TB infection as regards measuring an effective CMI response. The results of our study also demonstrate that the in-house sandwich ELISA based on the cross-reactivity with bovine IFNγ detects the IFNγ response produced by stimulated leukocytes from experimentally M. bovis-infected red deer. The optimization of an in-house sandwich ELISA has many advantages because it is relatively inexpensive and can be easily automated to process large numbers of samples. Moreover, the ability to modify IFNγ test parameters provides challenges to ensure the standardization of testing procedures and quality assurance, making it possible to provide a closer adaptation of this assay to the needs of different species of wild ruminants within a TB program.

The initial development of IFNγ-based tests for TB surveillance requires a powerful stimulation with mitogens or superantigens to effectively demonstrate the functional capacity of the sample or to detect an underlying CMI response suppression, thereby reducing the risk of false-negative test results. Prior studies have identified the PWM as a reliable trigger of the IFNγ production in other cervids [11, 41, 42, 58]. PWM was also the mitogen used as the positive control stimulant in this study and resulted in a consistent induction of acceptable quantities of IFNγ in samples from red deer, thus favoring the interpretation of the assay. Although PWM elicited a consistent positive control stimulus for the leukocytes with an OD greater than or equal to 0.5, the highest OD observed was 0.88, while in other experiences with reindeer the OD of the IFNγ response fluctuated from 1 to 1.8 when using the Cervigam test [41, 42, 58]. However, Waters et al. (2008) found a low OD response to the mitogen and evidenced of a limited usefulness of the Cervigam in samples from white-tailed deer, elk (Cervus canadensis) and fallow deer (Dama dama) [58].

The red deer used in this study were obtained from a TB-free farm and were negative to antibodies against bPPD when using ELISA before the experiment started. The animals were intratracheally challenged with M. bovis and infection was confirmed by means of pathology and culture. It is worth noting that some red deer responded with antibodies to bPPD from 30 dpi onwards and that, according to the ELISA test, most of them were positive to M. bovis at necropsy time (60 dpi). The antibody response was not directly correlated with the IFNγ results until 60 dpi (k = 0.73 with 95% confidence intervals), given that the development of humoral immunity to M. bovis takes longer than that of cell-mediated immunity, even in deer where the humoral immune response is initiated earlier than in other animals [6].

In effective TB eradication programs, the early detection of infected animals is a key to avoid maintaining and disseminating the infection. Significant efforts have therefore been made to improve the Se of diagnostic methods using ancillary tests such as the IFNγ assay. This test is expected to identify infected individuals at an earlier stage of infection than the skin test and the antibody ELISA [16, 5962]. In this study, IFNγ production was found as early as 15 dpi, thus enabling us to diagnose the disease at the initial stage, prior to the detection of serum antibodies.

Both nonspecific responses to PWM and specific responses to mycobacterial antigens varied widely between individual deer over time. This led us to exclude some samples at necropsy time owing to their inability to produce IFNγ in response to PWM (OD less than 0.5). This poor response to mitogen stimulation indicated a concurrent poor response to mycobacterial antigens, suggesting that either the assay was unable to detect the cytokine consistently or the leukocytes from M. bovis-infected deer were unable to produce IFNγ after 60 dpi. The inconsistent detection of IFNγ in the assay may be discarded because we detected a good response of this cytokine throughout the study with the protocol developed; the alterations in the immune response that affect the kinetics of the cytokine response would, therefore, be the most probably associated factor. Some immunological factors that depress the cell-mediated immunuty decrease the probability of detecting infected cattle in a context of impaired CMI response to mycobacterial antigens in IFNγ and skin tests, thus affecting their Se [58, 63, 64]. This state of “anergy” is recorded in animals subjected to stress and in cattle with advanced or generalized TB [10, 65]. This agrees with the findings observed in our study, in which the deer inoculated intratracheally with 106 CFU of M. bovis had generalized TB with a massive growth of mycobacteria in different tissues [43], which could explain this state of immunosuppression at 60 dpi. However, the suppression of the CMI appears to drift to a humoral immune response according to the response of antibodies to bPPD observed at necropsy time. This suggests that a combination of CMI-based techniques and the ELISA as an ancillary test for the detection of antibodies may increase the detection of infected animals, thus helping to control TB [66].

bPPD and aPPD, along with antigens specific for M. bovis, have been evaluated in this study for the diagnosis of TB in red deer using the IFNγ test. Responses to bPPD and p22 greater than 0.1 or 0.05 ΔOD with regard to aPPD and PBS are generally considered positive, while the responses to ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c were compared only with PBS. However, cut-off levels similar to those for tuberculin are being applied in cattle when considering these antigens (antigen minus PBS > 0.05 or 0.1) [45]. In the current study, we used samples obtained before the challenge and no deer had an IFNγ response to any of the antigens tested, as in previous studies of ruminants [25, 28, 29, 67]. After infection, the highest percentage of detection of infected deer with the IFNγ assay was for bPPD at the initial stage of the disease (92.8 to 100%) in comparison with other antigens, which is again in parallel with previous reports for ruminants [23, 25, 28, 29, 36, 41]. These results were the same as those obtained with the p22 stimulation when the 0.05 threshold was used (r = 0.9; p < 0.0001). However, slight differences in the identification of tuberculous animals were detected in the positive samples when using different antigens and the 0.1 cut-off point, indicating a lower degree of variation with a more stringent cut-off.

In this study, TB gave rise to a very slight cross-reactivity with aPPD, since OD values of aPPD were considerably lower than the readings produced when using bPPD. In field conditions, the exposure to M. avium or environmental non-tuberculous Mycobacterium spp. may induce cross-reactive responses with M. bovis antigens [68]. The presence of PTB or other infections caused by environmental mycobacteria is an interference factor in the diagnosis of TB using PPDs [67], but not using the ESAT-6/CFP-10 protein cocktail [68]. A limitation of this study was not including samples from animals infected with other species of mycobacteria as control owing to limited BSL3 laboratory space availability. Further studies are necessary to estimate the effects of these other mycobacteria, in addition to the single and comparative skin test, on IFNγ responses and to evaluate the mechanisms involved in these effects.

We compared the potential of specific antigens, present only in tuberculous mycobacteria and absent in non-tuberculous mycobacteria (ESAT-6/CFP-10, Rv3615c and Rv3020c), for their use in this diagnostic test. In particular, the use of these antigens may enhance the Sp of IFNγ-based tests in comparison to that achieved when standard PPDs are used as the eliciting agent.

The percentage of M. bovis-infected deer postitive to the technique with individual M. bovis specific antigens ranged widely depending on the antigens and the cut-off value applied. Proteins encoded within the ESAT-6 gene cluster (including ESAT-6 and CFP-10) of tuberculous mycobacteria play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease, inducing potent T-cell responses that have been used in TB diagnostic tests [28, 69, 70]. In the present study, the peptides cocktail combining ESAT-6 and CFP-10 elicited robust recall IFNγ responses in M. bovis-infected deer from 15 dpi onwards and reached a satisfactory detection of infected animals (92.3 to 100%), which is higher than in previous studies of domestic ruminants [28, 36, 39, 53, 65]. However, the relatively small sample size in our experiment resulted in a wide 95% CI, and future studies are required to confirm this observation under field conditions. It is possible, for example, that the high detection of M. bovis-infected animals seen in our study could be owing to the fact that all the animals used were exposed to a high dose of M. bovis and the samples were collected at an early stage of the disease. This may have led us to observe a decrease in the detection of TB-positive animals with all the antigens at 60 dpi due to a possible anergy of the animals.

In contrast to the responses to ESAT-6/CFP-10, the responses of M. bovis-infected deer to Rv3615c only slightly exceeded the pre-infection values, with a maximum detection of TB-positive deer at 15 dpi when 40% of the animals elicited an IFNγ response to the stimulation, similar to that which has been previously reported for cattle [39]. Various authors have reported that the use of Rv3615c in combination with ESAT-6 and CFP10 appears to increase the detection of TB-positive deer without false positives in the IFNγ assay [39, 56]. This observation is suggested by our results, were the use of antigen combinations provided better detection of infected animals. In particular, Rv3615c or Rv3020c were found to recognize infected deer missed by ESAT-6/CFP-10.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that the in-house sandwich ELISA developed for red deer IFNγ and based on the cross-reactivity with bovine IFNγ may serve as a valuable assay for the antemortem diagnosis of TB in deer experimentally infected with M. bovis, as early as 15 dpi. The suggested optimal antigens and cut-off are bPPD, p22 and the combination of ESAT-6/CFP-10 and Rv3020c with a 0.05 ΔOD. This yielded the detection of up to 100% of the positive and negatve deer under our experimental conditions. This technique will aid in TB testing of farmed and translocated deer. It would be useful to carry out further studies in order to evaluate the ability of this IFNγ assay to detect specific responses in field conditions.

Abbreviations

aPPD: 

Avian PPD

BCG: 

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin

bPPD: 

Bovine PPD

CCST: 

Comparative cervical skin test

CFU: 

Colony forming units

CMI: 

Cell-mediated immune response

dpi: 

Days post-infection

E%: 

ELISA percentage

EFSA: 

European Food Safety Authority

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

ESAT-6/CFP-10: 

Early secretory antigenic target-6 kDa and culture filtrate protein 10

IFNγ: 

Interferon gamma

LNs: 

Lymph nodes

M. bovis

Mycobacterium bovis

mAbs: 

Monoclonal antibodies

MTC: 

M. tuberculosis complex

OD: 

Optical density

p22: 

Protein complex purified bPPD tuberculin

PBMCs: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

PPD: 

Purified protein derivative

PTB: 

Paratuberculosis

PWM: 

Pokeweed mitogen

SCST: 

Single cervical skin-test

Se: 

Sensitivity

Sp: 

Specificity

TB: 

Tuberculosis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to Drs G. J. Jones and M. Vordermeier (APHA, Weybridge, UK) for their generous supply of peptide cocktails and for providing valuable comments on the manuscript. We also thank Sally Newton for her careful English review.

Funding

Research funding was provided by ‘Plan Nacional’ grant AGL2014–56305 (MINECO, Spain and FEDER). M.A. Risalde holds a ‘Juan de la Cierva program’ contract and F. Ruiz-Fons was funded by the ‘Ramón y Cajal’ program (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain). J. Thomas was supported by a grant from the Indian Council of Agricultural Research-International Fellowship 2014–15 (ICAR-IF 2014–15).

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article (and its Additional files).

Authors’ contributions

JFRF, CG, JG & MAR participated in the design and coordination of the experiment. MAR & JT participated in the conceptual aspects of the work. IS, MS, JAO & JG participated in sample collection and analysis. IS, MS, MAR, JG, CG & JFRF performed post-mortem examinations. MD & LD provided the p22 protein complex derived from bPPD and participated in the design of the experiment. All authors provided consultation and coordination. MAR, JT, CG & JFRF wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with all authors involved in reviewing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

This work was carried out with the informed consent of the owner of the red deer from the farm used in this study. The whole experimental procedure was carried out in accordance with the Code of Practice for Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures, approved by the European Economic Community in 1986 (86/609/EEC amended by the directive 2003/65/EC) and Spanish laws (R.D. 223/1988, R.D. 1021/2005). The protocol was also approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Regional Agriculture Authority (Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, Permit Number: NEIKER-OEBA-2015-010).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
SaBio (Health and Biotechnology), Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain
(2)
Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Maimonides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
(3)
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India
(4)
NEIKER-Tecnalia, Animal Health Department, Derio, Spain
(5)
Medianilla Red Deer Genetics, Benalup, Spain
(6)
Servicio de Inmunología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain
(7)
VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre. Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

References

  1. Gortázar C, Che Amat A, O'Brien DJ. Open questions and recent advances in the control of a multi-host infectious disease: animal tuberculosis. Mammal Rev. 2015;45:160–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Grange JM. Mycobacterium bovis infection in human beings. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81:71–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kazwala RR, Daborn CJ, Sharp JM, Kambarage DM, Jiwa SF, Mbembati NA. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from human cases of cervical adenitis in Tanzania: a cause for concern? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5:87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Roth F, Kazwala R. Economics of bovine tuberculosis. In: Thoen OC, Steel JH, Gilsdorf MJ, editors. Mycobacterium Bovis infection in animals and humans. 2nd ed. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2006. p. 68–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cousins DV. Mycobacterium bovis infection and control in domestic livestock. Rev Sci Tech. 2001;20:71–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffin JF, Buchan GS. Aetiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis in deer. Vet Microbiol. 1994;40:193–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fredriksen B, Djonne B, Sigurdardottir O, Tharaldsen J, Nyberg O, Jarp J. Factors affecting the herd level of antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 2004;154:522–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mackintosh CG, de Lisle GW, Collins DM, Griffin JF. Mycobacterial diseases of deer. N Z Vet J. 2004;52:163–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez-de-Mera IG, Vicente J, Hofle U, Fons FR, Ortiz JA, Gortazar C. Factors affecting red deer skin test responsiveness to bovine and avian tuberculin and to phytohaemagglutinin. Prev Vet Med. 2009;90:119–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollock JM, Neill SD. Mycobacterium bovis infection and tuberculosis in cattle. Vet J. 2002;163:115–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrington NP, Surujballi OP, Prescott JF, Duncan JR, Waters WR, Lyashchenko K, et al. Antibody responses of cervids (Cervus elaphus) following experimental Mycobacterium bovis infection and the implications for immunodiagnosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1650–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Buddle BM, Wilson T, Denis M, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Lyashchenko KP, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and confounding factors of novel serological tests used for the rapid diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:626–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Waters WR, Buddle BM, Vordermeier HM, Gormley E, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, et al. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for use in the detection of bovine tuberculosis in cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:1882–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Plackett P, Ripper J, Corner LA, Small K, de Witte K, Melville L, et al. An ELISA for the detection of anergic tuberculous cattle. Aust Vet J. 1989;66:15–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernstein E, Kaye D, Abrutyn E, Gross P, Dorfman M, Murasko DM. Immune response to influenza vaccination in a large healthy elderly population. Vaccine. 1999;17:82–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de la Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Christiansen KH, Clifton-Hadley RS. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: a review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci. 2006;81:190–210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. OIE. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Bovine tuberculosis. Available at: http://www.oie.int/doc/ged/D7710.PDF. (accessed on 28 Oct 2016). World Organization for Animal Health. 2009.
  18. Fernandez JG, Fernandez-de-Mera I, Reyes LE, Ferreras MC, Perez V, Gortazar C, et al. Comparison of three immunological diagnostic tests for the detection of avian tuberculosis in naturally infected red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Vet Diagn Investig. 2009;21:102–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Good M, Clegg TA, Murphy F, More SJ. The comparative performance of the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test in Irish cattle, using tuberculin PPD combinations from different manufacturers. Vet Microbiol. 2011;151:77–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wood PR, Corner LA, Plackett P. Development of a simple, rapid in vitro cellular assay for bovine tuberculosis based on the production of gamma interferon. Res Vet Sci 1990;49:46-9.Google Scholar
  21. Wood PR, Jones SL. BOVIGAM: an in vitro cellular diagnostic test for bovine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81:147–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lauzi S, Pasotto D, Amadori M, Archetti IL, Poli G, Bonizzi L. Evaluation of the specificity of the gamma-interferon test in Italian bovine tuberculosis-free herds. Vet J. 2000;160:17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Vordermeier HM, Chambers MA, Buddle BM, Pollock JM, Hewinson RG. Progress in the development of vaccines and diagnostic reagents to control tuberculosis in cattle. Vet J. 2006;171:229–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. EFSA. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA J. 2012:10, 2597.Google Scholar
  25. Schiller I, Vordermeier HM, Waters WR, Whelan AO, Coad M, Gormley E, et al. Bovine tuberculosis: effect of the tuberculin skin test on in vitro interferon gamma responses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010;136:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Whipple DL, Bolin CA, Davis AJ, Jarnagin JL, Johnson DC, Nabors RS, et al. Comparison of the sensitivity of the caudal fold skin test and a commercial gamma-interferon assay for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Am J Vet Res. 1995;56:415–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bezos J, Casal C, Romero B, Schroeder B, Hardegger R, Raeber AJ, et al. Current ante-mortem techniques for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci. 2014;97(Suppl):S44–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vordermeier HM, Whelan A, Cockle PJ, Farrant L, Palmer N, Hewinson RG. Use of synthetic peptides derived from the antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for differential diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:571–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Schiller I, Waters WR, Vordermeier HM, Nonnecke B, Welsh M, Keck N, et al. Optimization of a whole-blood gamma interferon assay for detection of Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:1196–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlson AG. The combined use of Ethambutol (Dextro-2, 2′-[Ethylenediimino]-Di-l-Butanol) and Isoniazid in experimental tuberculosis of Guinea pigs. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1962;86:439–41.Google Scholar
  31. Monaghan ML, Doherty ML, Collins JD, Kazda JF, Quinn PJ. The tuberculin test. Vet Microbiol. 1994;40:111–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Buddle BM, Parlane NA, Keen DL, Aldwell FE, Pollock JM, Lightbody K, et al. Differentiation between Mycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated and M. Bovis-infected cattle by using recombinant mycobacterial antigens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6:1–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Buddle BM, Ryan TJ, Pollock JM, Andersen P, de Lisle GW. Use of ESAT-6 in the interferon-gamma test for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis following skin testing. Vet Microbiol. 2001;80:37–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyashchenko K, Whelan AO, Greenwald R, Pollock JM, Andersen P, Hewinson RG, et al. Association of tuberculin-boosted antibody responses with pathology and cell-mediated immunity in cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and infected with M. bovis. Infect Immun. 2004;72:2462–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Waters WR, Nonnecke BJ, Palmer MV, Robbe-Austermann S, Bannantine JP, Stabel JR, et al. Use of recombinant ESAT-6:CFP-10 fusion protein for differentiation of infections of cattle by Mycobacterium bovis and by M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:729–35.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Aagaard C, Govaerts M, Meikle V, Vallecillo AJ, Gutierrez-Pabello JA, Suarez-Guemes F, et al. Optimizing antigen cocktails for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in herds with different prevalences of bovine tuberculosis: ESAT6-CFP10 mixture shows optimal sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4326–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. McNair J, Corbett DM, Girvin RM, Mackie DP, Pollock JM. Characterization of the early antibody response in bovine tuberculosis: MPB83 is an early target with diagnostic potential. Scand J Immunol. 2001;53:365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyashchenko KP, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Chambers MA, Vicente J, Gortazar C, et al. Animal-side serologic assay for rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in multiple species of free-ranging wildlife. Vet Microbiol. 2008;132:283–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sidders B, Pirson C, Hogarth PJ, Hewinson RG, Stoker NG, Vordermeier HM, et al. Screening of highly expressed mycobacterial genes identifies Rv3615c as a useful differential diagnostic antigen for the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3932–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiker HG. MPB70 and MPB83--major antigens of Mycobacterium bovis. Scand J Immunol. 2009;69:492–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Palmer MV, Waters WR, Whipple DL. Shared feed as a means of deer-to-deer transmission of Mycobacterium Bovis. J Wildl Dis. 2004;40:87–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Payeur JB, Harris NB, Minion FC, et al. Immune responses to defined antigens of Mycobacterium bovis in cattle experimentally infected with mycobacterium kansasii. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13:611–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas J, Risalde MA, Serrano M, Sevilla I, Geijo M, Ortíz JA, Fuertes M, Ruíz-Fons JF, de la Fuente J, Domínguez L, Juste R, Garrido J, Gortázar C. The response of red deer to oral administration of heat-inactivated Mycobacterium Bovis and challenge with a field strain. Vet Microb. 2017;208:195–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, et al. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:907–14.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Boadella M, Lyashchenko K, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Jaroso R, Carta T et al. Serologic tests for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011;23:77–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones GJ, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG, Vordermeier HM. Screening of predicted secreted antigens from Mycobacterium bovis reveals the immunodominance of the ESAT-6 protein family. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1326–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Bezos J, Alvarez J, Juan L, Romero B, Rodriguez S, Castellanos E, et al. Factors influencing the performance of an interferon-gamma assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in goats. Vet J. 2011;190:131–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Garrido JM, Sevilla IA, Beltran-Beck B, Minguijon E, Ballesteros C, Galindo RC, et al. Protection against tuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar vaccinated with heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24905.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pollock JM, Andersen P. Predominant recognition of the ESAT-6 protein in the first phase of interferon with Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Infect Immun. 1997;65:2587–92.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Berthet FX, Rasmussen PB, Rosenkrands I, Andersen P, Gicquel B. A mycobacterium tuberculosis operon encoding ESAT-6 and a novel low-molecularmass culture filtrate protein (CFP-10). Microbiology. 1998;144:3195–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Harboe M, Oettinger T, Wiker HG, Rosenkrands I, Andersen P. Evidence for occurrence of the ESAT-6 protein in mycobacterium tuberculosis and virulent Mycobacterium bovis and for its absence in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1996;64:16–22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Vordermeier HM, Cockle PC, Whelan A, Rhodes S, Palmer N, Bakker D, et al. Development of diagnostic reagents to differentiate between Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination and M. bovis infection in cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6:675–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Buddle BM, Wedlock DN, Parlane NA, Corner LA, De Lisle GW, Skinner MA. Revaccination of neonatal calves with Mycobacterium bovis BCG reduces the level of protection against bovine tuberculosis induced by a single vaccination. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6411–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Sidders B, Withers M, Kendall SL, Bacon J, Waddell SJ, Hinds J, et al. Quantification of global transcription patterns in prokaryotes using spotted microarrays. Genome Biol. 2007;8:265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones GJ, Whelan A, Clifford D, Coad M, Vordermeier HM. Improved skin test for differential diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis by the addition of Rv3020cderived peptides. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:620–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Whelan C, Whelan AO, Shuralev E, Kwok HF, Hewinson G, Clarke J, et al. Performance of the Enferplex TB assay with cattle in great Britain and assessment of its suitability as a test to distinguish infected and vaccinated animals. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:813–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Orloski K, Nol P, Harrington NP, et al. Blood culture and stimulation conditions for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in cervids by the Cervigam assay. Vet Rec. 2008;162:203–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Buddle BM, Keen D, Thomson A, Jowett G, McCarthy AR, Heslop J, et al. Protection of cattle from bovine tuberculosis by vaccination with BCG by the respiratory or subcutaneous route, but not by vaccination with killed mycobacterium vaccae. Res Vet Sci. 1995;59:10–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pollock JM, Welsh MD, McNair J. Immune responses in bovine tuberculosis: towards new strategies for the diagnosis and control of disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;108:37–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Gormley E, Doyle MB, Fitzsimons T, McGill K, Collins JD. Diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle by use of the gamma-interferon (Bovigam) assay. Vet Microbiol. 2006;112:171–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Nol P, Palmer MV, Waters WR, Aldwell FE, Buddle BM, Triantis JM, et al. Efficacy of oral and parenteral routes of Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccination against experimental bovine tuberculosis in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): a feasibility study. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44:247–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Charleston B, Hope JC, Carr BV, Howard CJ. Masking of two in vitro immunological assays for Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) in calves acutely infected with non-cytopathic bovine viral diarrhoea virus. Vet Rec. 2001;149:481–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hope JC, Thom ML, Villarreal-Ramos B, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Howard CJ. Vaccination of neonatal calves with Mycobacterium bovis BCG induces protection against intranasal challenge with virulent M. bovis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;139:48–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Lepper AW, Corner LA, Pearson CW. Serological responses in experimental bovine tuberculosis. Aust Vet J. 1977;53:301–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bezos J, Alvarez J, Romero B, Aranaz A, Juan L. Tuberculosis in goats: assessment of current in vivo cell-mediated and antibody-based diagnostic assays. Vet J. 2012;191:161–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Casal C, Infantes JA, Risalde MA, Díez-Guerrier A, Domínguez M, Moreno I, Romero B, de Juan L, Sáez JL, Juste R, Gortázar C, Domínguez L, Bezos J. Antibody detection tests improve the sensitivity of tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle. Res Vet Sci. 2017;112:214–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Queiros J, Alvarez J, Carta T, Mateos A, Ortiz JA, Fernandez-de-Mera IG, et al. Unexpected high responses to tuberculin skin-test in farmed red deer: implications for tuberculosis control. Prev Vet Med. 2012;104:327–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Flores-Villalva S, Suárez-Guemes F, Espitia C, Whelan AO, Vordermeier M, Gutiérrez-Pabello JA. Specificity of the tuberculin skin test is modified by use of a protein cocktail containing ESAT-6 and CFP-10 in cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:797–803.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Arend SM, Ottenhoff TH, Andersen P, van Dissel JT. Uncommon presentations of tuberculosis: the potential value of a novel diagnostic assay based on the mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5:680–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Renshaw PS, Lightbody KL, Veverka V, Muskett FW, Kelly G, Frenkiel TA, et al. Structure and function of the complex formed by the tuberculosis virulence factors CFP-10 and ESAT-6. EMBO J. 2005;24:2491–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement