Open Access

Prime-boost vaccination with attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium ΔznuABC and inactivated Salmonella Choleraesuis is protective against Salmonella Choleraesuis challenge infection in piglets

Contributed equally
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:284

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1202-5

Received: 24 November 2015

Accepted: 30 August 2017

Published: 11 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis (S. Choleraesuis) infection causes a systemic disease in pigs. Vaccination could represent a solution to reduce prevalence in farms. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of an attenuated strain of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC) against S. Choleraesuis infection. The vaccination protocol combined priming with attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC vaccine and boost with an inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine and we compared the protection conferred to that induced by an inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine.

Methods

The first group of piglets was orally vaccinated with S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC and boosted with inactivated S. Choleraesuis, the second one was intramuscularly vaccinated with S. Choleraesuis inactivated vaccine and the third group of piglets was unvaccinated. All groups of animals were challenged with a virulent S. Choleraesuis strain at day 35 post vaccination.

Results

The results showed that the vaccination protocol, priming with S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC and boosted with inactivated S. Choleraesuis, applied to group A was able to limit weight loss, fever and organs colonization, arising from infection with virulent S. Choleraesuis, more effectively, than the prime-boost vaccination with homologous S. Choleraesuis inactivated vaccine (group B).

Conclusion

In conclusion, these research findings extend the validity of attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC strain as a useful mucosal vaccine against S. Typhimurium and S. Choleraesuis pig infection. The development of combined vaccination protocols can have a diffuse administration in field conditions because animals are generally infected with different concomitant serovars.

Keywords

Attenuated and inactivated vaccines Mucosal vaccine Salmonella Choleraesuis Piglets Salmonellosis IFN-gamma

Background

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) and Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis (S. Choleraesuis) are the main etiological agents of salmonellosis in pigs. The former is responsible for enterocolitis in pigs [1] and zoonotic infections through consumption of contaminated pork products [2]. Conversely, S. Choleraesuis induces septicemia, pneumonia, enterocolitis, hepatitis, meningo-encephalitis and abortion in pigs [3], causing significant economic losses in pig industries [1, 4].

The principal tools for controlling typhoid-Salmonella are antimicrobials, vaccines, farm management and biosecurity plans. Differently, clinical cases of non-typhoid Salmonella are rare and, generally, pigs are sub-clinically infected [5, 6]. Recent monitoring programs had demonstrated that number of Salmonella multi-drug-resistant strains (typhoid and non-typhoid) has been incrementing. Antimicrobials are generally used for metaphylaxis or treatment of enterocolitis or other diseases caused by several pathogens in post-weaning phase. This activity has also determined an increment of multidrug strains frequently present in herds without clinical evidence (included Salmonella strains). It is also well recognized the ability of these bacteria to acquire drug-resistance from other bacteria by plasmid-transfer. However, due to the diffusion of multi-drug-resistant strains, the further uses of antibiotics is highly discouraged [7]. In alternative, vaccines could be an efficacious solution in reducing shedding of Salmonella spp., especially when vaccination is combined with biosecurity strategies [8, 9]. Unfortunately, safe and immunogenic live Salmonella attenuated vaccines are limited on the market and their efficacy against heterologous challenge is still not completely known [6, 10].

In recent years we have shown that mutant strains of S. Typhimurium, deleted of znuABC genes (S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC) are drastically attenuated and have significant potential as live vaccine [11]. In fact, we have demonstrated that this strain is attenuated and protective in both mouse and pig models of infections, against challenges with Salmonella Typhimurium wild type [1216].

The aim of this study was to assess whether S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC, boosted with the inactivated S. Choleraesuis, is able to exert protective effects versus wild type S. Choleraesuis and to compare its efficacy related to that induced by an inactivated S. Choleraesuis prime-boost vaccine. We boosted an attenuated S. Typhimurium vaccine with an inactivated S. Choleraesuis because attenuated vaccines favor T-cell response, which is very highly protective against intracellular bacteria as Salmonella. However, it is only partially protective against a typhoid S. Choleraesuis infection. For this reason, we boosted with a homologous inactivated vaccine, favoring maturation of affinity of the immune response and, in particular, of B cell, to complete immune response. In this way, antibodies versus all epitopes of this strain were generated, ensuring protection against extracellular bacteria which systemically spread during typhoid-infection.

Methods

Salmonella spp. cultures

As a vaccine strain, we used an attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC strain containing a cassette for chloramphenicol resistance inserted in the znuABC locus made resistant also to streptomycin by P-22 mediated transduction of hsdR::spec allele. Briefly, a fragment containing chloramphenicol resistance cassette was amplified from plasmid pKD3 and electroporated in a S. Typhimurium virulent strain (ATCC 14028). Correct insertion was confirmed by inability to grow in a zinc-poor medium and by PCR. Phage P-22 was used to transduce the mutation into a S. Typhimurium strain also resistance for streptomycin (transduction of hsdR::spec allele) [11].

S. Choleraesuis was cultivated in BHI broth (Reparto produzione Terreni, IZSLER, Brescia) at 37 °C overnight in a fermenter (Sartorius, Biostat Cplus, Italy) and then was inactivated with formaldehyde 0.8% (v/v). The final concentration of 2 × 1010 CFU/ml was determined by a Cell Density Meter (WPA CO 8000 Biowave Cell Density Meter, Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK) and then absorbed in 10 mg/ml of Aluminum hydroxide. Complete inactivation was confirmed by cultivating an aliquot of prepared vaccine in BHI agar at 37 °C for 48 h. (Vaccine and Reagent Preparation Laboratory of the “Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Lombardy and Emilia Romagna”, IZSLER).

S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC and virulent S. Choleraesuis were grown overnight at 37 °C in Brain Heart Infusion (Oxoid Ltd., UK), harvested by centrifugation and then washed twice in ice-cold phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (Sigma–Aldrich, Italy).

Experimental design

Experiments were authorized by the national authorities in accordance with Italian and European regulations (D.lgs 116/1992 implementing the European directive n° 86/609/CEE) and were conducted under the supervision of certified veterinarians.

Eighteen weaned piglets (28 days-old) were housed in the animal facility of the IZSLER, acclimatized for one week before the experiment and checked to be Salmonella-free using microbiological and serological analysis. The health-status of the native farm was monitored during last years. Particularly, sows were negative because they did not produce antibodies against a broad range of serogroups (IDEXX Herd-check Swine Salmonella Antibody test kit) and fecal samples, collected during last weeks of pregnancy, were negative for Salmonella culture performed in accordance with ISO 6579:2002. Similarly, serum and feces of their piglets, enrolled in this study, were collected a week before movement to test seroconversion and presence of positive culture. Piglets were divided into three groups (6 animals per group).

Vaccines were administered a week after their arrival (35 days-old) following a protocol described below. Group A, vaccinated by oral gavage, with 5 × 107 CFU of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC dissolved in 20 ml of sodium bicarbonate buffer, and boosted after two weeks with an intramuscular administration of inactivated S. Choleraesuis at the dose of 2 × 109 CFU/ml. Group B was intramuscularly vaccinated with S. Choleraesuis inactivated vaccine and boosted after two weeks at the dose of 2 × 109 CFU/ml. Group C was maintained as an unvaccinated naïve control. Fecal samples were collected at 1, 5, 13, 18 and 33 days after vaccination to determine the amount of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC attenuated strain.

All groups were challenged, by gavage, with 5 × 108 CFU of S. Choleraesuis virulent strain dissolved in 20 ml of sodium bicarbonate buffer, at day 35 from first vaccination. Temperature was measured at 3, 4, 5 and 7 days after infection. Animals were weighed at first vaccination and before necropsy (day 47 from first vaccination). Tonsils, ileocecal lymph nodes, spleen, liver, intestinal content of ileum, cecum, colon and jejunum were collected during necropsy for microbiological analyses and gross lesions of organs were recorded.

Microbiology

Fecal shedding and organ colonization of S. Choleraesuis and S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC were determined using the ISO 6579: 2002/ Amendment 1: 2007 protocol. Samples were weighed and homogenized in 9 parts of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) (Oxoid Ltd., UK). This solution was first used to perform a Serial Dilution in BPW. All BPW samples (diluted or not) were incubated at 37 °C for 18 ± 3 h. Afterwards, 0.1 ml of BPW cultures were seeded on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis agar (MSRV) plates (Oxoid Ltd., UK) and incubated at 41.5 °C for 48 h for selection and enrichment of Salmonella. A loopful of culture from an MSRV plate was streaked onto Xylose-Lysine-Deoxycholate Agar (Oxoid Ltd., UK) and Brillant Green Agar (Oxoid Ltd., UK) plates and then incubated at 37 °C overnight. Suspect Salmonella colonies were subjected to biochemical identification by BBL Enterotube II (BD Franklin Lakes, NJ USA) and serological identification using Salmonella group-specific antisera. XLD agar allows a primary distinction of H2S+ and H2S- Salmonella strains. This is a semi-quantitative approach consisting in application of the qualitative approach to each ten-fold dilution.

The semi-quantitative approach allows us to establish a range of concentration of Salmonella in a sample. This method limits enumeration of Salmonella in a sample, but it reduces presence of concomitant bacteria and favors isolation of Salmonella. Results express a range of concentration in each sample as reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Semi-quantitative approach for count of Salmonella-colonies

Ten-fold dilution positive

results express in

LOG10

CFU/g

Negative

0

Negative also after enrichment

1:101

1

1–10 CFU/g

1:102

2

11–100 CFU/g

1: 103

3

101–1000 CFU/g

1: 104

4

1001–10,000 CFU/g

1: 105

5

10,001–100,000 CFU/g

1: 106

6

100,001–1,000,000 CFU/g

1: 107

7

1,000,001–10,000,000 CFU/g

Results of positive ten-fold dilution are expressed as LOG10 and correspond to a range of CFU/g. They represent a semi-quantitative approach to establish concentration in a sample

Interferon-γ production

At necropsy, ileocecal lymph nodes, draining the site of inoculum, were collected from animals of groups A-C to compare IFN-γ concentration after challenge. Lymph nodes were homogenized by a mortar in fetal calf serum (Gibco Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) + 5% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO, USA) and filtered with gauze to retain coarse particles. An aliquot of cell suspension was then stored at −80 °C using a proteinase inhibitor (Protease Inhibitor Cocktail kit, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL., USA), until use. IFN-γ production was assessed by a sandwich ELISA (Pig Interferon-γ; −IFN-γ, ELISA Kit, Cusabio, P.R. China), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The exact amount of IFN-γ production was then calculated by normalizing the result using total protein content. Total protein content was determined by application of Lambert-Beer Law [17]. In particular, The amount of the tissues after homogenization was standardized by total protein concentration and a specific volume of each homogenate was analyzed by ELISA kit. In conclusion, results were determined by the concentration of cytokine per ng of total protein (pg of IFN-g/ng of total protein).

Serology

The serological examination was performed using a commercial indirect ELISA test capable of detecting antibodies against Salmonella serogroups B, C1 and D (Herd-Check Swine Salmonella Antibody Test Kit, IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Switzerland). The test was carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and analyzed at an optical density of 450 nm. Results were expressed as a sample to positive ratio [S:P ratio = (OD of sample – OD of negative control)/(OD of positive control – OD of negative control)].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (vers. 4.0) software (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data related to temperature and antibody titers were analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA and completed with the Bonferroni post-test. Data related to organ colonization were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (non-parametric one-way analysis of variance – ANOVA) and completed with the Dunn’s Multiple Comparison post-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC strain is not detectable in feces 18 days after vaccination

Firstly, we wanted to reconfirm the safety and the limited environmental contamination of attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC. For this reason, fecal samples were weekly collected after vaccination in animals of group A, to estimate the amount of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC (Fig. 1). Fecal samples were also collected in animals of groups B and C, but these animals did not shed Salmonella spp. (data not shown). The attenuated strain was shed up to 18 days after vaccination and the number of shedder pigs and the concentration of bacteria sharply decreased from vaccination and thereafter.
Fig. 1

Attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC is not detectable from day 18 after vaccination. In a, symbols depict the mean concentration of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC (expressed as LOG10 CFU/g) in group A at different time points (day 1, 5, 13, 18, 33 after vaccination). Bars represent the standard deviation. In b, columns represent the percentage of shedder piglets of group A at different time-points. S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC is not detectable from day 18 after vaccination. Group B and C are not shown because negative. Depicted microbiological results derived from the semi-quantitative approach

Combined vaccination protocol reduces clinical symptoms induced by S. Choleraesuis infection

We analyzed the efficacy of vaccination, considering the clinical, microbiological and immunological parameters influenced by a S. Choleraesuis infection.

The mean temperatures of the three groups are shown in Fig. 2. Overall, irrespective to the treatment, piglets challenged with the wild-type strain of Salmonella Choleraesuis showed a raise of body temperature which tend to drop back down to baseline one week after infection.
Fig. 2

Vaccination with attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC prevents fever. Body temperature of groups A, B and C is shown at different time points (day 3, 4, 5 and 7 after challenge). Symbols represent mean and bars standard deviation. Symbols (*) represent differences statistically significant among groups with p < 0.01

Nevertheless, we observed that the raise of body temperature of group B and C was higher than that of group A, especially at 3 and 5 days after infection (p < 0.05).

We further compared the weight gain from vaccination to the killing to assess if different protocols of vaccination could influence the weight gain. As depicted in Fig. 3, we did not record any difference among groups throughout the observation in terms of weight gain.
Fig. 3

Attenuated strain of S. Typhimurium does not retard the weight gain of piglets. Symbols represent the weight gain of eighteen animals, divided into groups A, B and C, while vertical bars represent the standard deviation from the beginning to the end of the study (day 0 and 47). No differences are recorded. The weight of animals vaccinated with the attenuated strain of S. Typhimurium is not different from other groups

Combined vaccination protocol significantly reduces organ colonization after challenge infection with virulent S. Choleraesuis

Organ colonization tested at 12 days after challenge was low and barely detectable in many organs. Tonsils, spleen, liver and intestinal content of jejunum were colonized only in a very limited percentage (data not shown). Organs which showed the most reliable colonization were cecum and ileocecal lymph nodes (Fig. 4). Overall, we observed that piglets of group A, treated with combined vaccination protocol (oral administration of attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC vaccine boosted after two weeks with an intramuscular injection of inactivated S. Choleraesuis), showed a reduction of Salmonella Choleraesuis colonization and that inactivated vaccine, administered to piglets of group B, did not exert an analogous effect. In particular, cecum colonization of group A was statistically different from group B and C, and ileocecal lymph nodes colonization of group A was significantly lower than group B.
Fig. 4

S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC vaccine reduces organ colonization. Amount of S. Choleraesuis in lymph nodes, ileum, cecum and colon of group A-C piglets was determined 12 days after challenge. Depicted microbiological results derived from the semi-quantitative approach. Each symbol represents microbiological results obtained from each animal and each bar represents mean concentration. Differences are statistically significant in cecum between group A and the other groups (p < 0.05) and in lymph nodes between group A and B

Combined vaccination protocol induces both innate and humoral immunity in response to a S. Choleraesuis challenge infection

We estimated the response induced by vaccination and infection, by analyzing IFN-γ and humoral response. At day 47 after the first vaccination (i.e. 12 days after the challenge infection), IFN-γ was produced in a higher concentration in the ileocecal lymph nodes from piglets of group C compared to those from piglets of vaccinated groups (Fig. 5). In particular, IFN-γ concentration was approximately 0.02 ng/ml in group C and the difference was statistically significant when compared to the concentration in group A. On the contrary, the concentration of IFN-γ in leukocytes of group B was not statistically different from that in group C.
Fig. 5

S. Choleraesuis challenge infection induces IFN-ɤ production. Symbols and bars represent piglets and IFN-ɣ mean concentration, respectively. Concentration of IFN-ɤ was normalized in relation to total protein content. Difference was statistically significant between the unvaccinated group (C) and group A vaccinated with the attenuated strain ** (p < 0.05). LLD indicates Lower Limit of Detection (15.6 pg/ml); LS indicates Limit of Sensitivity (minimum detectable dose, 3.9 pg/ml)

Antibody response was monitored after vaccination and after challenge in all groups of piglets enrolled in this study. Vaccinated piglets of group A and B had a humoral response starting from the first week after vaccination, with an increasing of s/p ratio (OD) thereafter; in group C, on the other hand, the response started after infection. Humoral responses were similar between the two vaccinated groups and the differences observed were statistically significant when comparing the group A to C (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC vaccine and inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine induce antibody production. Symbols and bars represent mean and standard deviation of s/p ratio in 3 groups, respectively. The pattern of humoral immunity is similar between group A (vaccinated with Attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC) and in group B (vaccinated with killed S. Choleraesuis). The X-axis is divided into two segments to differentiate between antibody response after vaccination (DAV) and challenge (DAC). Differences are statistically significant between vaccinated piglets with attenuated strain and unvaccinated piglets from day 18 after vaccination. On the contrary, differences are statistically different between vaccinated piglets with inactivated strain and unvaccinated piglets only at day 35 and 47 after vaccination. Gray star indicates significant difference between groups B and C, while black star indicates significant difference between group A and C

Discussion

Salmonellosis is a public health problem primarily caused by consumption of pork products contaminated with S. Typhimurium [2]. On the contrary, S. Choleraesuis, a host-adapted serovar in pigs, causes a typhoid-like disease in piglets, which is characterized by reduced growth and, in the most severe cases, a high mortality rate, and hence mainly representing an economic problem [1, 18]. S. Choleraesuis is not considered to be a major agent of zoonotic infections, although some cases of human infection have been recorded, especially in Asia [8].

Vaccination of pigs could represent a valid control system in countries with a high prevalence of salmonellosis in animals. Attenuated vaccines are more effective than inactivated ones in protecting against enteric diseases, due to their ability to induce cell-mediated and mucosal immunity [19]. To address this issue, in previous study we assessed the safety and efficacy of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC strain in different models of infection [1116]. In the current work, an attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC boosted with an inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine was compared to an inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine in providing immune-based protection against a S. Choleraesuis challenge infection.

The cross-protection had already been investigated in a mouse challenge infection [12], suggesting that S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC is able to induce partial protection against heterologous challenge with S. Choleraesuis. We therefore set up a new vaccination protocol based on an oral vaccination with attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC followed by an intramuscular boost with an inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine after two weeks.

As control groups, piglets were vaccinated and boosted with inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine or were kept as naïve unvaccinated ones. Attenuated vaccines induce a more effective T-cell involvement against facultative intracellular bacteria, such as Salmonella [20, 21]. We hypothesized that, a boost with an inactivated vaccine may favor the maturation of affinity of the immune response and the production of mucosal and serum antibodies against somatic antigens, thus completing the host immune response and enhancing the efficacy of the attenuated strain. The shedding pattern of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC was characterized by a sharp decline within few days and then it was not detectable in feces after five weeks. Those data corroborate findings and data previously published that showed a limited and self-limiting persistence of S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC [1416]. We found that, when challenged with virulent S. Choleraesuis, piglets vaccinated with the prime-boost protocol with attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC and inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine showed a lower increase in body temperature compared to the other groups. In this study, we observed a modest colonization of organs which suggests that the employed Salmonella Choleraesuis strain is not highly virulent and/or that it needs more time or different condition to develop the acute form. Nonetheless, cecum colonization of group A was lower than colonization of groups B and C, whilst ileocecal lymph nodes colonization was lower only in comparison to group B.

These findings suggest that this combined vaccination protocol is able to exert protection, while prime-boost vaccination with inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine does not curb the progression of infection and organ colonization. These data support the hypothesis that vaccination with the attenuated S. Typhimurium ΔznuABC, previously investigated as safe and effective against S.Typhimurium [1416], followed by boost with inactivated S. Choleraesuis vaccine could decrease the number of pigs carrying different serovars of Salmonella in field conditions.

Studies focused on the heterologous protection have previously been published. Schwarz et al. [22] demonstrated that an attenuated strain of S. Choleraesuis reduced the prevalence of Salmonella in carrier pigs at the slaughterhouse. This attenuated strain was used on a farm infected with S. Brandenburg, S.Typhimurium and S. Agona. Moreover, cross-protection was also documented between host-specific strains. House et al. [23] demonstrated that an attenuated S. Choleraesuis vaccine, licensed for swine, was more efficacious than an autogenous Salmonella bacterin in pregnant cows infected with S. Montevideo. We can infer that there is an overlap between antigenic determinants that induce protection. Other studies, however, should be performed to identify the common virulence factors of different serovars involved in animal salmonellosis. This knowledge is necessary to develop an efficacious multivalent Salmonella vaccine.

To better understand the protection induced by vaccination, we analyzed host response after challenge, considering IFN-γ and antibody production. IFN-γ was chosen as a paradigmatic cytokine for a Th1 cell mediated immune response which is known to be involved in the control of Salmonella infection. Particularly, IFN-γ is an important cytokine produced by natural killer cells (NK) and T-cells, in response to phagocytosis of Salmonella by macrophages and other antigen presenting cells (APC) during the earlier phase of its systemic dissemination [19, 24]. In our study, the concentration of IFN-γ in groups A and B was lower than that of group C, at day 12 after infection suggesting that IFN-γ production is a marker of the host response, as reported previously [15]. Moreover, we obtained a seroconversion of piglets one week after vaccination that significantly increase after challenge with virulent S. Choleraesuis. These results are in line with the study of Husa et al. [25] that compared the safety, cross-protection and serological response of two commercial live S. Choleraesuis in response to experimental challenge infection with S. Typhimurium. S. Choleraesuis vaccines, indeed, induced a humoral response characterized by an increase in antibody titers after vaccination, which rapidly rose after challenge with the heterologous strain.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we produce scientific evidence that a vaccination protocol, characterized by combination of attenuated and inactivated vaccines of S. Typhimurium and S. Choleraesuis, is effective against challenge infection with S. Choleraesuis. In perspective, these data suggest that it is could be possible to develop new effective vaccine strategies for the treatment of animals simultaneously infected by different serovar of Salmonella, a condition that commonly occurs in field conditions.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

BPW: 

Buffered peptone water

CFU: 

Colony Forming Unit

DMSO: 

DiMethyl sulfoxide

IFN-γ: 

Interferon-gamma

IZSLER: 

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna [Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Lombardy and Emilia Romagna]

ml: 

milliliter

MSRV: 

Modified semisolid rappaport vassiliadis agar

ng: 

nanogram

NK: 

Natural killer cells

OD: 

Optical density

PBS: 

Phosphate buffer solution

XLD: 

Xylose-lysine-deoxycholate agar

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Staff of the animal facilities for their dedication and to Studio Moretto for the English writing assistance. The research by Pesciaroli Michele was partly supported by a PICATA postdoctoral contract of the Moncloa Campus of International Excellence (UCM-UPM, Campus Moncloa, VISAVET).

Funding

The research study was supported by internal funding of IZSLER.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

GLA: Designed experimental approach; performed experimental design; analyzed data. JR: Performed experimental design and microbiological and serological analyses; analyzed results; drafted manuscript. MP: Performed experimental design and analyses; analyzed results; drafted manuscript. NM: Performed experimental design. BC: Performed serological and immunological analyses; analyzed results; contributed to draft manuscript. SA: Performed experimental design and analyses; contributed to draft manuscript. AB: Designed experimental approach; analyzed results; contributed to draft manuscript. MCO: Designed experimental approach; performed experimental design. AC: Designed experimental approach; performed experimental design. PP: Designed experimental approach; performed experimental design; analyzed data, contributed to draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study had involved eighteen animals and it was conducted in accordance to European and National Legislation (D.lgs 116/1992 implementing the European directive n° 86/609/CEE). It was approved by Ethical committee of IZSLER.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna [Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Lombardy and Emilia Romagna]
(2)
FAO Reference Center for Veterinary Public Health, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità
(3)
UCM-UPM, Campus Moncloa
(4)
Department of Biology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata
(5)
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma

References

  1. Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R. Salmonella challenges: prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates1,2J Anim Sci. Apr. 2008;86:E149–62. Epub 2007 Oct 2. ReviewGoogle Scholar
  2. EFSA. Trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA J. 2010;8(1):1496.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ku YW, McDonough SP, Palaniappan RU, Chang CF, Chang YF. Novel attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis strains as live vaccine candidates generated by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Infect Immun. 2005;73:8194–203.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Selke M, Meens J, Springer S, Frank R, Gerlach GF. Immunization of pigs to prevent disease in humans: construction and protective efficacy of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium live negative-marker vaccine. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2476–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Wales AD, Cook AJ, Davies RH. Producing Salmonella-free pigs: a review focusing on interventions at weaning. Vet Rec. 2011;168:267–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Busser EV, De Zutter L, Dewulf J, Houf K, Maes D. Salmonella control in live pigs and at slaughter. Vet J. 2013;196:20–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Glenn MN, Lindsey RL, Frank JF, Meinersmann RJ, Englen MD, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Frye JG. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes detected in multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolated from food animals.. Crit rev Microbiol. 2013; 39:57-69. Microb Drug Resist. 2011;17(3):407–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haneda T, Okada N, Kikuchi Y, Takagi M, Kurotaki T, Miki T, Arai S, Danbara H. Evaluation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Choleraesuis slyA mutant strains for use in live attenuated oral vaccines. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;34:399–409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilhelm B, Rajic A, Parker S, Waddell L, Sanchez J, Fazil A, Wilkins W, McEwen S. Assessment of the efficacy and quality of evidence for five on-farm interventions for Salmonella reduction in grow-finish swine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Vet Med. 2012;107:1–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Foss DL, Agin TS, Bade D, Dearwester DA, Jolie R, Keich RL, Lohse RM, Reed M, Rosey EL, Schneider PA, Taylor LP, Willy MS. Protective immunity to Salmonella enterica is partially serogroup specific. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;155:76–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ammendola S, Pasquali P, Pistoia C, Petrucci P, Petrarca P, Rotilio G, Battistoni A. High-affinity Zn2+ uptake system ZnuABC is required for bacterial zinc homeostasis in intracellular environments and contributes to the virulence of Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun. 2007;75:5867–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pasquali P, Ammendola S, Pistoia C, Petrucci P, Tarantino M, Valente C, Marenzoni ML, Rotilio G, Battistoni A. Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter confers immune-based protection against challenge infections in mice. Vaccine. 2008;26:3421–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pesciaroli M, Aloisio F, Ammendola S, Pistoia C, Petrucci P, Tarantino M, Francia M, Battistoni A, Pasquali P. An attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain lacking the ZnuABC transporter induces protection in a mouse intestinal model of Salmonella infection. Vaccine. 2011;29:1783–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pesciaroli M, Gradassi M, Martinelli N, Ruggeri J, Pistoia C, Raffatellu M, Magistrali CF, Battistoni A, Pasquali P, Alborali GL. Salmonella Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter is attenuated and immunogenic in pigs. Vaccine. 2013;31:2868–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gradassi M, Pesciaroli M, Martinelli N, Ruggeri J, Petrucci P, Hassan WH, Raffatellu M, Scaglione FE, Ammendola S, Battistoni A, Alborali GL, Pasquali P. Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter: an efficacious orally-administered mucosal vaccine against salmonellosis in pigs. Vaccine. 2013;31:3695–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruggeri J, Pesciaroli M, Gaetarelli B, Scaglione FE, Pregel P, Ammendola S, Battistoni A, Bollo E, Alborali GL, Pasquali P. Parenteral administration of attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium ΔznuABC is protective against salmonellosis in piglets. Vaccine. 2014;32:4032–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodger A. Concentration Determination Using Beer-Lambert Law. In: Roberts GCK, editor. Encyclopedia of Biophysics. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 360–1.Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz KJ. Salmonellosis. In: Straw BE, D'Allaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ, editors. Diseases of swine. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1999. p. 535–51.Google Scholar
  19. Mastroeni P, Chabalgoity JA, Dunstan SJ, Maskell DJ, Dougan G. Salmonella: Immune response and vaccines. Vet J. 2000;161:132–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wallis TS. Salmonella pathogenesis and immunity: we need effective multivalent vaccines. Vet J. 2001;161:104–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, Chiers K, Maes D, Ducatelle R, Decostere A. Efficacy of vaccines against bacterial diseases in swine: what can we expect? Vet Microbiol. 2004;100:255–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwarz P, Kich JD, Kolb J, Cardoso M. Use of an avirulent live Salmonella Choleraesuis vaccine to reduce the prevalence of Salmonella carrier pigs at slaughter. Vet Rec. 2011;169:553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. House JK, Ontiveros MM, Blackmer NM, Dueger EL, Fitchhorn JB, McArthur GR, Smith BP. Evaluation of an autogenous Salmonella bacterin and a modified live Salmonella serotype Choleraesuis vaccine on a commercial dairy farm. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:1897–902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lalmanach AC, Lantier F. Host cytokine response and resistance to Salmonella infection. Microbes Infect. 1999;1:719–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Husa JA, Edler RA, Walter DH, Holck JT, Saltzman RJ. A comparison of the safety, cross-protection, and serologic response associated with two commercial oral Salmonella vaccines in swine. J Swine Health Prod. 2009;17:10–21.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement