Open Access

The immune mechanism of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 168 vaccine strain through dendritic cells

BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:285

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1194-1

Received: 27 February 2017

Accepted: 11 August 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp) causes porcine enzootic pneumonia, a disease that cause major economic losses in the pig industry. Dendritic cells (DCs), the most effective antigen-presenting cells, are widely distributed beneath respiratory epithelium, DCs uptake and present antigens to T cells, to initiate protective immune responses in different infections. In this study, we investigated the role of porcine DCs in vaccine Mhp-168 exposure.

Results

The antigen presenting ability of DCs were improved by vaccine Mhp-168 exposure. DCs could activate T-cell proliferation by up-regulating the antigen presenting molecule MHCII expression and co-stimulatory molecule CD80/86. However, the up-regulation of IL-10 and accompany with down-regulation of IFN-γ gene level may account for the limitation of attenuated Mhp-168 strain use as vaccine alone.

Conclusion

These findings are benefit for exploring the protection mechanisms and the possible limitations of this attenuated Mhp-168 vaccine.

Keywords

Vaccine Mhp-168 strain, Dendritic cells, Immune protection

Background

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp) causes porcine enzootic pneumonia (EP) and causes tremendous economic losses all over the swine industry [1]. Mhp infection is difficult to eradicate and it will long term existence in most herds by direct sow-to-pig exposure [2]. Mhp infection causes physical damage on the respiratory tract and modulates the host immune response [3], the primary Mhp infection often becomes complicated by secondary bacterial and viral infections [4]. Mhp infection causes the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-18 both in vivo and in vitro [5]. In healthy animal, the lower respiratory tract (trachea and lung) is essentially sterile, pathogenic microorganisms have the opportunity to colonize and invade the host when the cilia clearance ability is impaired [6]. Mhp-derived lipid-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs) result in either necrosis or apoptosis in macrophages and porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in vitro [7]. Accordingly, cilia clearance loss, macrophages and PBMC dysfunction are responsible for immunosuppression and predisposes pigs to secondary infections. Some drugs and antibiotics are effective against Mhp,but they can’t completely clear the infection of Mhp. In addition, drug resistance and antibiotic residues are important issues. Vaccination is another essential strategy in controlling Mhp infection. Some commercially available vaccines are the inactivated whole cells of Mhp, however, inactivated vaccine only provide the partly protection for Mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine (MPS) [8]. Shao et al. have identified that the attenuated Mhp 168 strain vaccine developed an effective protection against MPS [9]. However, the exact immunologic mechanism of this attenuated vaccine still has not been researched detailedly.

Dendritic cells (DCs), the most professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [10], are widely distributed in the mucosal tissue, preparing for monitor the invasion of pathogens [11]. By extending trans-epithelial dendrites, DCs sample incoming pathogens and migrate to the T-cell region of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) to trigger an effective immune response [12]. The nasal mucosa barrier is a key impediment for Mhp up-take and subsequent antigen-specific adaptive immune responses. The interactions between Mhp and DCs have not been investigated. Whether DCs result in the generation of beneficial immune responses during attenuated Mhp immune process still unclear.

The vaccine Mhp-168 has been used in some Chinese farms with good immune-protection against Mhp. Our study aimed to gain a better understanding of the immunologic mechanism of this attenuated vaccine. We have characterized the immune responses of porcine DCs after exposure with vaccine Mhp-168 and their capacity to induce T cell responses in vitro.

Methods

Animals

A total of 20 five weeks old, Yorkshire, Landrace, and Large White cross-bred pigs were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions (e.g. Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus, Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea Virus, Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, Mhp). All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University (Nanjing, China) and followed National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Reagents

Antibodies PE-conjugated co-stimulatory molecules cluster of differentiation (CD) 80/86 (ab69778), PE-conjugated CD1a(ab25599), FITC-conjugated Workshop Cluster 3a (SWC3a, ab24885) were obtained from Abcam (New Territories, Hong Kong). FITC-conjugated histocompatibility leukocyte Ag II-DR (MHCII, LS-C129867) was obtained from LifeSpan BioSciences (Seattle, WA, USA). PE-conjugated SWC3a (74-22-15A) was obtained from BD Biosciences (USA). Recombinant swine interleukin 4 (IL-4), was bought from BioSource (USA). Recombinant swine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was bought from Invitrogen (USA). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was bought from Sigma (Japan). RPMI 1640 medium and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution were bought from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was bought from MULTICell (Canada). SABC-POD (rabbit IgG) Kit and Peroxidase Substrate Kit were bought from BOSTER (Wuhan, China). RNA extraction kit was bought from TianGen Biotech (Beijing, China).

Mycoplasma pneumonia 168

Vaccine M. hyopneumoniae strain 168 (vaccine Mhp-168) was an attenuated vaccine strain, which cultured from continuous passage of Mhp wild strain [13]. The wild strain was completely attenuated by more than 300 passages in KM2 media. The 340th passage of M. hyopneumoniae 168 strain was confirmed safety for cross-bred pigs and 360th passage of M. hyopneumoniae 168 strain could developed the effective protection against MPS [9]. We obtained vaccine Mhp-168 from Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology and the 360 th passage of M. hyopneumoniae 168 strain was used in our experiment. This vaccine Mhp-168 was cultured in KM2 medium until the beginning of the stationary phase. Then it was collected after centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min and washed twice with PBS.

Generation of bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs)

BMDCs were isolated and cultured using our advanced method [14]. Briefly, bone marrow was extracted from the femurs of 1.5 months old piglets and treated with red blood cell lysing buffer. The bone marrow cells were differentiated into DCs by suspending the cells in complete medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 10 ng/ml GM-CSF and IL-4). After 60 h of culture, non-adherent granulocytes were removed gently by discarding the medium, and fresh medium was added. Non-adherent and loosely adherent cells were harvested on day 6 and sub-cultured overnight in complete medium. On day 7, immature DCs were collected for further experiments.

Exposure of BMDCs to vaccine Mhp-168

On day 7 of the culture, immature DCs were collected and seeded into 24-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well). RPMI 1640 medium (negative control), 10 ng/ml of LPS (positive control) or vaccine Mhp-168 (40/dendritic cell) were added for 8 h, 12 h and 24 h incubation period respectively. Both the Mock and the stimulated DCs were collected after 24 h for flow cytometry analysis. Both the Mock and the stimulated DCs were collected at 8 h, 12 h and 24 h respectively for total RNA extraction.

Flow cytometry

In order to determine the modulation of surface markers on DCs treated with LPS or vaccine Mhp-168 in particular time point, treated DCs samples were washed with cold PBS twice and stained with fluorescent mAbs specific for swine or human SWC3a, CD80/86, CD1a and MHCII at 4 °C for 0.5 h as per manufacturer’s guidelines. After washed three times with PBS, FACS was used to detect phenotype of DCs.

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of the cytokine secretion by DCs

The total RNA of Mock DCs and stimulation DCs were obtained using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was generated by reverse transcription using HiScript TM QRT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression data were collected using 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Hercules, CA) and analyzed by the Ct methods. The relative IL-10/IL-12/IFN-γ mRNA was normalized with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The specific primers were shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Primers used for RT-qPCR

Gene

Sequence (5’ to 3’)

IL-10 forwardIL-10 forward

TCTGAGAACAGCTGCATCCAC

IL-10 reverse

CGCCCATCTGGTCCTTCGTT

IL-12 forward

TCAGAAGGCCAAACAAACCCT

IL-12 reverse

GGCAACTCTCATTCGTGGCTA

INF-γ forward

CGCAAAGCCATCAGTGAACTCA

INF-γ reverse

TCTGGCCTTGGAACATAGTCT

GAPDH forward

TCATCATCTCTGCCCCTTCT

GAPDH reverse

GTCATGAGTCCCTCCACGAT

Mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) assay

To analyze the capacity of DCs to activate T lymphocytes, Pig was anaesthetized before exsanguinated. Inguinal lymph nodes were collected for lymphocytes separation. Purified T cells were stained with CFSE following the instruction. CFSE-labelled T-lymphocytes (5 × 105) were co-cultured with Mph-DCs or Mock-DCs at a ratio of 1:1; 1:5 (DCs: lymphocytes). Co-cultures were incubated for five days. Finally, the cells were harvested, and the fluorescence intensity of the CFSE was determined by flow cytometry analysis.

Statistical analysis

Each of the experiments was performed at least three individual times. Data was performed using Statistical Product and Services Solutions (SPSS) package. Statistical difference was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Morphology of BMDCs after 6 days culture

Bone marrow-derived cells were cultured for 6 days by using RPMI 1640 media with GM-CSF and rpIL-4 to allow them to differentiate into immature BMDCs. Cell phenotypes were then evaluated by using microscopy. BMDCs formed clusters until the day 5 (Fig. 1a), and dendritic processes could be observed on the day 6 (Fig. 1b). When porcine monocytes were cultured without adding GM-CSF and IL-4, only a few live cells were left and no cell aggregates were observed in the plates by day 6 (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

Generation of BMDCs. Porcine BMDCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4. a The clusters of BMDCs on day 5, as viewed by optical microscopy at 100 ×magnification. b Morphology of cells after 6 days of culture, dendritic processes could be observed using optical microscopy at 400 × magnification. c Porcine BMDCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented without GM-CSF and IL-4 as control

Phenotypic alteration of BMDCs stimulated by vaccine Mhp-168 in vitro

DCs phenotypic maturation is essential for T cells activation and immune response. DCs up-regulate the expression of co-stimulatory and antigen presentation associated factors at the mature stage [15]. We used flow cytometry and the antibodies described earlier to detect surface expression of CD80/86, MHCII and CD1a to determine whether vaccine Mhp-168 affects the maturation and activation of DCs. By gating on untreated BMDCs, we compared the variation of phenotype between the untreated BMDCs and vaccine Mhp-168 treated-BMDCs in the same culture condition. Comparing with untreated immature Mo-DCs, immature Mo-DCs showed changes in surface marker expression characteristic of DC maturation (up-regulation of SWC3a + CD80/86+ and SWC3a + MHCII+), after being stimulated by the vaccine Mhp-168 or LPS (Fig. 2b and c). There is no significant change of SWC3a+CD1a+ co-stimulatory molecule expression after being exposed to vaccine Mhp-168 (Fig. 2a and b). These results suggest that stimulation of immature Mo-DCs triggers maturation.
Fig. 2

Expression of antigen presenting molecules and co-stimulatory molecules on DCs after vaccine Mhp-168 exposure at 24 h.p.i. Immature BMDCs were exposed to vaccine Mhp-168 (40/dendritic cell) or LPS (10 ng/ml) as positive control for 24 h. Dot plots show the percentage of CD1a+SWC3a+DCs, CD80/86+SWC3a+ DCs and MCHII+SWC3a+ DCs. a Untreated BMDCs. b Mhp 168 treated DCs. c LPS treated DCs. d Bar graphs show the percentage of CD1a+SWC3a+, CD80/86+SWC3a+, MHCII+SWC3a+ cells in BMDCs populations after vaccine Mhp-168 exposure. Data show the means ± SEM (n = 3 per group). All experiments were performed independently three times. Statistical significance was assessed by Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01

Vaccine Mhp-168 stimulation modulates the expression of cytokines

Cytokines production by DCs also play an important role in immunomodulation besides the expression of surface molecules [16]. Therefore, we investigated whether vaccine Mhp-168 was able to modulate cytokine production by monitoring the mRNA expression level of IL-10, IL-12, INF-γ in vaccine Mhp-168 stimulated BMDCs lysis. Immature Mo-DCs stimulated with vaccine Mhp-168 show up-regulation of IL-10 and IL-12 mRNA expression level at 8 h incubation and increased at a steady-state level, with maximal production at 24 h incubation (Fig. 3a and b). While down-regulation expression of cytokines was observed in INF-γ at 8 h incubation and at a steady-state level, with maximal production at 24 h incubation (Fig. 3c). All LPS stimulated immature Mo-DCs showed increasing in IL-12, IFN-γ and IL-10 mRNA expression level. These results indicated that immature Mo-DCs have the capacity to activate an immune response to vaccine Mhp-168 by up-regulation IL-12 and IL-10 mRNA expression level.
Fig. 3

Cytokines mRNA expression levels of DCs after vaccine Mhp-168 exposure. a IL-10; b IL-12; c IFN-γ. BMDCs were treated with vaccine Mhp-168 or LPS (10 ng/mL) for 8 h, 12 h and 24 h. The mRNA expression levels of IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ were detected by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3 per group). All experiments were performed independently three times. Statistical significance was assessed by Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01

Vaccine Mhp-168 treated-BMDCs promote T cells proliferation

The immune stimulatory properties of DCs to T cells are essential for adaptive immune responses. Here, allogenic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) was performed to determine whether the ability of BMDCs induced T cells proliferation have changed after being treated with vaccine Mhp-168. As shown in Fig. 4, mature BMDCs stimulated by LPS up-regulate the ability of T cells proliferation at a DC/T cell ratio of 1:1 and 1:5. The proliferation capacity of T cells were promoted after being stimulated by Mhp-168 both at a DC/T cell ratio of 1:1 and 1:5.
Fig. 4

Vaccine Mhp-168 treated DCs increased the capacity of T lymphocytes stimulation. Pretreatment DCs with vaccine Mhp-168 for 24 h. Vaccine Mhp-168-treated DCs were co-cultured with T lymphocytes (ratios 1:1, 1:5) for another 5 days (a, b). DCs were stimulated with LPS or remained unstimulated then co-cultured with T lymphocytes as positive or control group. T lymphocytes proliferation was evaluated using CFSE. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 per group). All experiments were performed independently three times. Statistical significance was assessed by Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01

Discussion

Mhp is the primary etiological agent responsible for swine enzootic pneumonia (EP), which cause tremendous economic losses all over the swine industry [17]. There are many strategies to prevent Mycoplasma infection, such as drugs and antibiotics. However, they have not been proved effective inhibition of this pathogens in vivo, and still have problems of resistance and antibiotics residue [18]. Until now, vaccination is one of the essential strategy in controlling EP. Clinical study shows vaccine Mhp-168 activated the systemic cellular immunity and local mucosal immunity, which is benefit for prevention and control of EP [9]. Dendritic cells (DCs), the most effective antigen-presenting cells, are widely distributed beneath respiratory epithelium. DCs have the ability to capture antigens and then present to T cells, initiating protective immune responses during infection [19]. In the present study, we examined whether vaccine Mhp-168 could affect DCs generated from porcine monocytes in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 [14]. The function of antigen presentation of DCs is related to surface molecules [20]. In this study, we demonstrated that exposure of immature BMDCs to vaccine Mhp-168 results in the up-regulation of MHCII and CD80/86, which stimulates immature BMDCs to develop antigen presentation functions. Generally, DCs present antigen with CD1a or MHCII as the first signal and CD80/86 as the second co-stimulatory signal to activate T cells [20]. CD1a is a member of the MHCI family which involves in the presentation of intracellular and lipid antigens [21]. Many pathogenic microorganisms, such as porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, can be presented by CD1a [22, 23]. However, surface molecule CD1a has no significant difference between vaccine Mhp-168 treated group and control group. This results indicate that DCs present Mhp-168 to T cells do not via CD1a. These results indicate that vaccine Mhp-168 exposure causes the maturation of immature BMDCs. Up-regulating the expression of surface molecules and co-stimulatory molecules such as CD80/86, mature BMDCs present antigen information to T cells.

In addition to antigen recognition and presentation, DCs provide different cytokine microenvironments that leading differentiation of T cells into effector cells [24]. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine, which can both impede pathogen clearance and ameliorate immunopathology [25]. Autocrine IL-10 signaling in DC can inhibit chemokine production and prevent their homing to lymph nodes, leading to the failure to recruit and induce TH1 differentiation of naïve T cells [26]. Many bacterial infections induce overexpression of IL-10, which is leading to uncontrolled pathogen growth [27]. Studies have shown that the systemic and local immune levels were not effectively activated after intranasal vaccination with the attenuated Mhp-168 strain alone [28]. IFN-γ secretion by DCs is a crucial cytokine for the control of infectious diseases [29]. IFN-γ production were negatively regulated by IL-10 [30]. Our results demonstrate that exposure of vaccine Mhp-168 to DCs induces significant increase in IL-10 production. The increase indicated that although Mhp-168 exposure would induce maturation of DCs, it also promotes massive secretion of IL-10. Our study also found a down-regulation of IFN-γ produced by DCs. Overexpression of IL-10 and accompany with down-regulation of IFN-γ level may be one of the reasons why vaccination with the Mhp-168 strain alone could not achieve productive immune effect in practical application.

Stimulation of T cell proliferation is one of the important functions of dendritic cells. We used mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) assay to evaluate the ability of DCs to induce T cell proliferation [31]. We found that vaccine Mhp-168 treated BMDCs increase the proliferation of T cells both at DC/T cell ratio of 1:1 and 1:5. The stimulation level at a DC/T cell ratio of 1:1 exhibited a stronger stimulatory effect. This results indicate that primary T cells is activated by presentation of BMDCs though surface molecule MHCII and CD80/86. This results are also correlated with the highest expression of CD80/86 and MHCII in Mhp-168 treated immature BMDCs.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study is the first description of the interaction between vaccine Mhp-168 and porcine BMDCs. Our data indicates that Mhp-168 enhances the ability of BMDCs to present and induce the proliferation of T lymphocytes. However, vaccine Mhp-168 exposure induce significant increase in IL-10 and accompany with decrease in INF-γ expression by DCs, which indicate the possibility of immune failure in practical application with vaccine Mhp-168 alone.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Antigen-presenting cells

BMDCs: 

Bone marrow-derived DCs

DCs: 

Dendritic cells

EP: 

Porcine enzootic pneumonia

LAMPs: 

Lipid-associated membrane protein

MALT: 

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue

Mhp

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae

PBMCs: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Guoqing Shao and Prof. Zhixin Feng for providing us with the Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains as well as his laboratory space and for the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Grant of PR China (No. 31372465) and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YMS contributed to study design, collected and analyzed data and wrote the first draft of the paper. WWH analyzed data and revised the manuscript. YNW analyzed data and revised the manuscript. ZXF revised the manuscript. QY conceived the study, contributed to study design and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

The animal care and use protocol was approved by the Health Sciences Animal Care Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University, in accordance with the guidelines of the China Council on Animal Care.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Veterinary College, Nanjing Agricultural University
(2)
Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, National Center for Engineering Research of Veterinary Bio-products

References

  1. DeBey M, Jacobson C, Ross R. Histochemical and morphologic changes of porcine airway epithelial cells in response to infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Am J Vet Res. 1992;53(9):1705–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rautiainen E, Wallgren P. Aspects of the transmission of protection against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from sow to offspring. J Veterinary Med Ser B. 2001;48(1):55–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Opriessnig T, Thacker E, Yu S, Fenaux M, Meng X-J, Halbur P. Experimental reproduction of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs by dual infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2. Vet Pathol Online. 2004;41(6):624–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Maes D, Segales J, Meyns T, Sibila M, Pieters M, Haesebrouck F. Control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2008;126(4):297–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Woolley LK, Fell SA, Djordjevic SP, Eamens GJ, Jenkins C. Plasmin activity in the porcine airways is enhanced during experimental infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, is positively correlated with proinflammatory cytokine levels and is ameliorated by vaccination. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164(1):60–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mizgerd JP. Acute lower respiratory tract infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):716–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai F, Ni B, Liu M, Feng Z, Xiong Q, Shao G. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-derived lipid-associated membrane proteins induce inflammation and apoptosis in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Vet Microbiol. 2015;175(1):58–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thacker EL, Thacker BJ, Boettcher TB, Jayappa H. Comparison of antibody production, lymphocyte stimulation, and protection induced by four commercial Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bacterins. J Swine Health Prod. 1998;6(3):107–12.Google Scholar
  9. Feng Z-X, Shao G-Q, Liu M-J, Wu X-S, Zhou Y-Q, Yuan G. Immune responses to the attenuated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 168 strain vaccine by intrapulmonic immunization in piglets. Agric Sci China. 2010;9(3):423–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Harman AN, Bye CR, Nasr N, Sandgren KJ, Kim M, Mercier SK, Botting RA, Lewin SR, Cunningham AL, Cameron PU. Identification of lineage relationships and novel markers of blood and skin human dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(1):66–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee H, Ruane D, Law K, Ho Y, Garg A, Rahman A, Esterházy D, Cheong C, Goljo E, Sikora A. Phenotype and function of nasal dendritic cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(5):1083–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. von Garnier C, Nicod LP. Immunology taught by lung dendritic cells. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139(13–14):186–92.Google Scholar
  13. Jing H, Mao H. Diagnosis and prevention for mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Publications; 1993. p. 4–6. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Chen X, Tu C, Qin T, Zhu L, Yin Y, Yang Q. Retinoic acid facilitates inactivated transmissible gastroenteritis virus induction of cd8+ t-cell migration to the porcine gut. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24152.Google Scholar
  15. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392(6673):245–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Steinman RM. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991;9(1):271–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sørensen V, Ahrens P, Barfod K, Feenstra AA, Feld NC, Friis NF, Bille-Hansen V, Jensen NE, Pedersen MW. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs: duration of the disease and evaluation of four diagnostic assays. Vet Microbiol. 1997;54(1):23–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hannan P, Windsor H, Ripley P. In vitro susceptibilities of recent field isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae to valnemulin (Econor®), tiamulin and enrofloxacin and the in vitro development of resistance to certain antimicrobial agents in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Res Vet Sci. 1997;63(2):157–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Farache J, Koren I, Milo I, Gurevich I, Kim K-W, Zigmond E, Furtado GC, Lira SA, Shakhar G. Luminal bacteria recruit CD103+ dendritic cells into the intestinal epithelium to sample bacterial antigens for presentation. Immunity. 2013;38(3):581–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Mellman I, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines. Cell. 2001;106(3):255–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Barral DC, Brenner MB. CD1 antigen presentation: how it works. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(12):929–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Spada FM, Grant EP, Peters PJ, Sugita M, Melián A, Leslie DS, Lee HK, Van Donselaar E, Hanson DA, Krensky AM. Self-Recognition of Cd1 by γ/δ T Cells. J Exp Med. 2000;191(6):937–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao Q, Zhao S, Qin T, Yin Y, Yu Q, Yang Q. Effects of inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on porcine monocyte-derived dendritic cells and intestinal dendritic cells. Res Vet Sci. 2016;106:149–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Merad M, Sathe P, Helft J, Miller J, Mortha A. The Dendritic Cell Lineage: Ontogeny and Function of Dendritic Cells and Their Subsets in the Steady State and the Inflamed Setting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31(5):563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Couper KN, Blount DG, Riley EM. IL-10: the master regulator of immunity to infection. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):5771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Demangel C, Bertolino P, Britton WJ. Autocrine IL-10 impairs dendritic cell (DC)-derived immune responses to mycobacterial infection by suppressing DC trafficking to draining lymph nodes and local IL-12 production. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32(4):994–1002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Groux H, Cottrez F, Rouleau M, Mauze S, Antonenko S, Hurst S, Mcneil T, Bigler M, Roncarolo MG, Coffman RL. A transgenic model to analyze the immunoregulatory role of IL-10 secreted by antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1999;162(3):1723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Y, Li P, Wang X, Yu Q, Yang Q. Co-administration of attenuated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 168 strain with bacterial DNA enhances the local and systemic immune response after intranasal vaccination in pigs. Vaccine. 2012;30(12):2153–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Suzue K, Asai T, Takeuchi T, Koyasu S. In vivo role of IFN-γ produced by antigen-presenting cells in early host defense against intracellular pathogens. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33(10):2666–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukao T, Matsuda S, Koyasu S. Synergistic effects of IL-4 and IL-18 on IL-12-dependent IFN-γ production by dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2000;164(1):64–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med. 1994;179(4):1109–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement