Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Veterinary Research

Open Access

Impact of growth matrix on pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs for pig pneumonia pathogens

BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:192

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1086-4

Received: 16 December 2016

Accepted: 31 May 2017

Published: 23 June 2017

Abstract

Background

The most widely used measure of potency of antimicrobial drugs is Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). MIC is usually determined under standardised conditions in broths formulated to optimise bacterial growth on a species-by-species basis. This ensures comparability of data between laboratories. However, differences in values of MIC may arise between broths of differing chemical composition and for some drug classes major differences occur between broths and biological fluids such as serum and inflammatory exudate. Such differences must be taken into account, when breakpoint PK/PD indices are derived and used to predict dosages for clinical use. There is therefore interest in comparing MIC values in several broths and, in particular, in comparing broth values with those generated in serum. For the pig pneumonia pathogens, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida, MICs were determined for three drugs, florfenicol, oxytetracycline and marbofloxacin, in five broths [Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI) and Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB)] and in pig serum.

Results

For each drug, similar MIC values were obtained in all broths, with one exception, marbofloxacin having similar MICs for three broths and 4–5-fold higher MICs for two broths. In contrast, for both organisms, quantitative differences between broth and pig serum MICs were obtained after correction of MICs for drug binding to serum protein (fu serum MIC). Potency was greater (fu serum MIC lower) in serum than in broths for marbofloxacin and florfenicol for both organisms. For oxytetracycline fu serum:broth MIC ratios were 6.30:1 (P. multocida) and 0.35:1 (A. pleuropneumoniae), so that potency of this drug was reduced for the former species and increased for the latter species. The chemical composition of pig serum and broths was compared; major matrix differences in 14 constituents did not account for MIC differences. Bacterial growth rates were compared in broths and pig serum in the absence of drugs; it was concluded that broth/serum MIC differences might be due to differing growth rates in some but not all instances.

Conclusions

For all organisms and all drugs investigated in this study, it is suggested that broth MICs should be adjusted by an appropriate scaling factor when used to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints for dosage prediction.

Keywords

Minimum inhibitory concentrationFlorfenicolOxytetracyclineMarbofloxacin A. Pleuropneumoniae P. Multocida

Background

Dosage regimens of antimicrobial drugs should be optimized first to achieve clinical and bacteriological cure and second to provide minimal opportunities for the selection of resistant organisms. The successful outcome of therapy depends on both the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, which determines the drug concentration-time course at the site of infection and the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile that is drug effect on the pathogen [14]. Hence, a rational approach to dose prediction, for subsequent confirmation or adaptation in disease models and clinical trials, is dependent on PK/PD integration and modelling methods. These establish PK/PD breakpoints for pre-determined levels of kill [26].

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) is the primary PD parameter used to determine potency; it is the lowest drug concentration that inhibits visible bacterial growth after 16–24 h incubation. Standardised methodologies for MIC determination are described in European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [7] guidelines [VET01-A4 (formerly M31-A3)]. These ensure reproducibility between individual analysts, between laboratories and across both geographical regions and time [5, 8]. CLSI and EUCAST methods require the use of broths formulated to standardises the growth of bacteria of each bacterial species. Thus, the almost universal use of internationally recognised guidelines, methods and standards for MIC determination is highly beneficial. However, when the objective of potency determination is prediction of dosage for clinical efficacy based on PK/PD breakpoints, conditions should be representative of in vivo pathological circumstances. Zeitlinger et al. [9] commented that “bacteria with appropriate and well-defined growth in the selected medium should be employed” and “in order to be able to extrapolate data from various models to in vivo situations, models should always attempt to mimic physiological conditions as closely as possible”.

Whilst serum is not identical to extravascular infection site fluids, it is likely to be closer to the biophase than broths in chemical composition and indeed in respect of immunological components also [9, 10]. A comparison of broth MICs with potency determined in biological fluids is therefore relevant to PK/PD breakpoint estimation, when the aim is optimal dose prediction for clinical use. For some drugs and pathogens, calculation of a scaling factor to bridge between broth and serum MICs may be warranted [4, 6, 10].

A second consideration, in relation to dose prediction, is that CLSI and EUCAST guidelines have limitations regarding accuracy for individual isolates, because they require use of two-fold dilutions, giving potential for approaching 100% error. For most purposes, this is wholly acceptable, and indeed is necessary, when large numbers of isolates are examined to establish MIC distributions. When plotted on a histogram, using a log-base 2 distribution, they are log-normal. These histograms facilitate the identification of wild-type distributions. Standardisation of methodology thereby enables determination of epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFF) by EUCAST and wild type cut-offs (COWT) by CLSI. However, modification of the two-fold dilution approach may be appropriate, when MICs are correlated with PK data for establishing PK/PD breakpoints. Based on methods previously described [11, 12] five overlapping sets of doubling dilutions were used in this study to decrease inaccuracy from up to 100% to no more than 20% for a small number of individual isolates. Hence, the quantitative determination potency with improved accuracy and in biological fluids may be appropriate for some drug classes and some microorganisms, when calculating PK/PD indices [6, 10, 1216].

It is the hypothesis of this investigation that MICs determined in pig serum (potentially reflecting more closely concentrations required to achieve clinical efficacy than those determined in artificial broths) might differ from MICs determined in broths. The aims were to: (1) compare MICs measured in five broths with MICs determined in pig serum, using five sets of overlapping two-fold dilutions for three drugs, florfenicol, marbofloxacin and oxytetracycline, used in the treatment of pig pneumonia caused by the pathogens, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida; (2) determine whether any broth/serum MIC differences were attributable solely to drug binding to serum protein; (3) compare chemical compositions of CLSI recommended broths and pig serum; (4) determine rates of growth A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida in broths and pig serum in the absence of drugs. Aims 3 and 4 were included to investigate whether chemical composition differences and/or bacterial growth rate differences between broth and serum might account for matrix MIC differences over and above those attributable binding of the drugs to serum protein.

Methods

Selection of bacterial isolates for MIC studies

Don Whitley Scientific (Shipley, West Yorkshire, UK) supplied 20 isolates of P. multocida and three American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) reference strains to validate MIC tests; A. pleuropneumoniae ATCC 27090, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. Eight isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae were supplied by A. Rycroft (Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, UK). All P. multocida and A. pleuropneumoniae isolates were obtained from European Union (EU) field cases of pig pneumonia, specifically the UK and France. The quality control organisms were incorporated in each MIC test. Organisms were stored at -80 °C.

From the organisms supplied, three isolates of each species were selected, based on three criteria: (1) exhibiting logarithmic growth in all broths (see below) and pig serum; (2) sensitivity to florfenicol, marbofloxacin and oxytetracycline in disk diffusion assays (data not shown); and (3) the highest and lowest CLSI defined broth MICs and one isolate of intermediate MIC, determined using two-fold dilutions (data not shown).

Culture media and bacterial counts

For A. pleuropneumoniae Chocolate Mueller Hinton Agar (CMHA) was used to grow the organism on a solid medium. Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood, was used to grow P. multocida. Columbia broth (CB) supplemented with 2 μg/mL nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) was used as the principal liquid broth for A. pleuropneumoniae MIC determination. CLSI guidelines require use of Veterinary Fastidious Medium (VFM) for the liquid culture of A. pleuropneumoniae. However, for isolates used in this study, MIC end-points were more readily and reliably established using CB than with VFM. In the latter broth, there was difficulty defining MIC end-points, because the high density of red blood cells caused them to settle at the base of the well obscuring the result of MIC. The CLSI recommended broth for P. multocida is Cation Adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (CAMHB), and this was the principal liquid broth used in this study for this organism.

Both organisms were incubated in a static incubator at 37 °C for 18–24 h. For comparative purposes, MICs were determined for both organisms in five broths, CB, CAMHB, Mueller Hinton broth (MHB), Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI), Tryptic soy broth (TSB), and pig serum (Invitrogen Gibco Porcine Serum, Origin: New Zealand, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK).

Bacterial counts were determined by serial dilution and spot plate counts. Culture dilutions were carried out in phosphate buffered saline. Three 10 μL drops of the appropriate dilutions were dropped onto the agar surface and allowed to dry. After 24 h incubation, the mean colony forming unit (CFU) count for each 10 μL was determined and multiplied by 100 and then multiplied by the dilution factor to give the original CFU/mL count.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations in six growth matrices

MICs of florfenicol, marbofloxacin and oxytetracycline were determined by microdilution in 96-well plates for three isolates each of A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida, using CLSI guidelines, except that: (1) five sets of overlapping two-fold serial dilutions were used to reduce inaccuracy for individual isolates to no greater than 20%; (2) determinations were made in five broths, MHB, CAMHB, CB, BHIB, TSB and pig serum; (3) the bacterial culture was grown to 0.5 McFarland Standard and this was diluted ten-fold to obtain the intended starting inoculum of 1–2 × 107 CFU/mL. This starting inoculum count is higher than the CLSI recommendation of 5 × 105 CFU/mL, the higher inoculum count being selected deliberately to be equivalent clinically to a medium to heavy in vivo microbial challenge.

Drug solutions, media and culture were added sequentially to the wells of 96-well plates, with a total volume of 200 μL. These were sealed and incubated statically at 37 °C for 24 h. Spot plate counts were prepared immediately after plate inoculation. ATCC isolates were used in all assays at the CLSI recommended strength of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. A positive control well contained medium and pathogen only and a negative control well contained medium and drug only. Blank controls contained medium alone.

MICs were determined in triplicate for each isolate of each species and each drug. In previous studies in this laboratory, binding to pig serum protein had been determined for each drug over the therapeutic concentration range and shown to be independent of concentration [1719]. Percentage binding was 49, 65 and 71 for marbofloxacin, florfenicol and oxytetracycline, respectively. As serum protein bound drug is microbiologically inactive, MICs for serum were reported first, as uncorrected, experimental values and second, as values corrected for free drug (that is unbound) concentration, termed the fu serum MIC.

Chemical composition of growth matrices

For analysis of 14 chemical constituents, three batches of each broth were prepared in 10 mL quantities, according to manufacturer’s instructions and three batches each of pig and calf serum were obtained commercially (ThermoFisher Scientific, Paisley, UK). Calf serum was included to compare the composition of pig serum with another farm animal species. Samples were analysed for total protein, albumin, globulin, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, inorganic phosphorus, urea, creatinine, glucose, iron and Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity (UIBC) (ILAB 600 Instrumentation Laboratory Ltd., Cheshire UK; Nova Biomedical CCX and Phox, Cheshire UK).

Bacterial growth in broth and serum

Twenty isolates each of P. multocida and A. pleuropneumoniae (Don Whitley Scientific (Shipley, West Yorkshire, UK) supplied 20 isolates of both organisms for the purpose of determining growth in media), from clinical cases of pig pneumonia, were used to investigate bacterial growth in the absence of antimicrobial drugs. Growth rates were determined in pig serum and the CLSI recommended broths, VFM for A. pleuropneumoniae and CAMHB for P. multocida.

Three mL of serum, CAMHB or VFM were aseptically added to the wells of a 96-well plate. Two control wells containing medium alone ensured the absence of contamination. Six independent colonies were removed from a fresh agar plate aseptically and mixed into the medium within the wells. The well plates were placed in a static incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. At times of 0, 6 and 24 h viable counts were determined. Bacterial growth was monitored in triplicate for each of 20 isolates of each species.

Results

Minimum inhibitory concentration

Tables 1, 2 and 3 present MIC data for each drug as geometric means and standard deviation for pig serum, MHB, CAMHB, CB, BHIB and TSB.
Table 1

P. multocida (PM) and A. pleuropneumoniae (APP) Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for marbofloxacin; mean and standard deviation (SD) in pig serum and five brothsa

 

PM (n = 3)

APP (n = 3)

Matrix

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Serum

0.09

0.52

0.69

0.23

fu Serum

0.04

0.27

0.35

0.12

MHB

0.06

0.01

0.93

0.17

CAMHB

0.07

0.05

0.91

0.13

CB

0.25

0.14

1.00

0.00

BHIB

0.27

0.18

1.14

0.25

TSB

0.05

0.01

1.37

0.22

aCation Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) and Tryptic Soy broth (TSB)

Table 2

P. multocida (PM) and A. pleuropneumoniae (APP) Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for florfenicol; mean and standard deviation (SD) in pig serum and five brothsa

 

PM (n = 3)

APP (n = 3)

Matrix

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Serum

0.30

0.13

0.47

0.18

fu Serum

0.10

0.05

0.16

0.06

MHB

0.47

0.03

0.36

0.02

CAMHB

0.55

1.19

0.36

0.04

CB

0.50

0.00

0.43

0.03

BHI

0.50

0.00

0.45

0.05

TSB

0.49

0.02

0.44

0.04

aCation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB),, Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) and Tryptic Soy broth (TSB)

Table 3

P. multocida (PM) and A. pleuropneumoniae (APP) Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for oxytetracycline; mean and standard deviation (SD) in pig serum and five brothsa

 

PM (n = 3)

APP (n = 3)

Matrix

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Serum

6.20

2.06

3.47

2.38

fu Serum

1.80

0.60

1.01

0.69

MHB

0.28

0.04

2.56

0.29

CAMHB

0.29

0.04

2.34

0.24

CB

0.30

0.04

2.92

0.28

BHI

0.34

0.05

3.06

0.21

TSB

0.38

0.03

3.22

0.42

aCation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB),, Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) and Tryptic Soy broth (TSB)

Marbofloxacin

P. multocida MICs were similar for three broths, MHB, CAMHB and TSB (range = 0.05–0.07 μg/mL). MICs were 4–5-fold higher for CB and BHIB (0.25–0.27 μg/mL). Serum MIC was 0.09 μg/mL and, corrected for protein binding, fu serum MIC was 0.04 μg/mL. The mean MIC ratio fu serum:CAMHB was 0.63:1.

For A. pleuropneumoniae broth MICs were similar (range = 0.91 μg/mL for CAMHB to 1.37 μg/mL for TSB). Serum MIC was 0.69 μg/mL and fu serum MIC was 0.35 μg/mL; mean MIC ratio fu serum:CB was 0.35:1.

Florfenicol

For P. multocida MICs in all broths were similar; range = 0.47 μg/mL for MHB to 0.55 μg/mL for CAMHB. Serum MIC was 0.30 μg/mL and fu serum MIC was 0.10 μg/mL. The mean MIC ratio fu serum:CAMHB was 0.19:1.

For A. pleuropneumoniae broth MICs ranged from 0.36 μg/mL for both MHB and CAMHB to 0.45 μg/mL for BHIB. Serum MIC was 0.47 μg/mL and fu serum MIC was 0.16 μg/mL, so that mean MIC ratio fu serum:CB was 0.38:1.

Oxytetracycline

For P. multocida broth MICs were similar, ranging from 0.28 μg/mL (MHB) to 0.38 μg/mL (TSB). Serum MIC was 6.20 μg/mL and fu serum MIC was 1.80 μg/mL. The mean MIC ratio fu serum:CAMHB was 6.30:1.

Broth MICs for A. pleuropneumoniae ranged from 2.34 μg/mL (CAMHB) to 3.22 μg/mL (TSB). Serum MIC and fu serum MIC were 3.47 and 1.01 μg/mL, respectively, so that the mean MIC ratio fu serum:CB was 0.35:1.

Chemical composition of broths and serum

Table 4 presents comparative data on the chemical composition of six broths and pig serum for 14 constituents. In addition, for comparison with the latter, the composition of serum for another farm animal species, the calf, was determined (Fig. 1). The data were derived for the mean of three batch samples of each fluid.
Table 4

Chemical composition of brothsa and pig and calf sera: mean and standard deviation (SD) (n = 3 batches)a

Matrix

Total protein (g/L)

Albumin (g/L)

Globulin (g/L)

Sodium (mmol/L)

Potassium (mmol/L)

Calcium (mmol/L)

Magnesium (mmol/L)

Chloride (mmol/L)

Inorganic phosphorus

(mmol/L)

Urea (mmol/L)

Creatinine (μmol/L)

Glucose (mmol/L)

Iron (μmol/L)

Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity (μmol/L)

Porcine serum

79.3

40.3

39.0

153

7.13

2.59

0.98

115

2.82

4.67

139

5.47

19.1

78.00

SD

2.20

0.17

2.03

4.4

0.06

0.14

0.09

8.96

0.61

3.35

5.5

0.84

0.15

0.36

Bovine serum

74.3

38.1

37.1

148

7.07

2.55

1.00

108

3.28

5.23

149

4.43

22.2

71.00

SD

3.65

2.11

1.31

15.4

1.04

0.55

0.17

7.55

0.98

0.60

9.9

0.29

0.61

0.43

MHB

3.23

0.00

3.23

125

2.49

0.13

0.23

99.23

2.55

0.93

61.3

2.57

9.47

-6.90

SD

0.12

0.00

0.12

0.2

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.32

0.03

0.06

2.31

0.06

0.15

0.44

CAMHB

4.10

0.07

4.03

127

2.87

5.21

4.20

117

2.96

2.97

83.3

2.57

9.53

-7.20

SD

0.44

0.06

0.46

11.5

0.21

2.14

1.68

5.29

0.34

0.64

2.08

0.25

0.17

1.24

CB

12.6

0.10

12.5

130

14.58

0.22

1.41

112

4.99

2.90

217

12.90

63.9

-56.50

SD

0.20

0.00

0.20

0.1

0.01

0.01

0.02

0.26

0.02

0.10

2.31

0.00

0.62

1.74

BHI

9.67

0.10

9.57

168

10.01

0.13

0.25

123

6.86

5.97

418

10.20

7.50

-3.17

SD

0.21

0.00

0.21

0.2

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.56

0.07

0.06

3.61

0.20

0.10

1.11

TSB

9.07

0.10

9.00

118

9.56

0.05

0.18

79.33

4.85

2.17

260

11.77

6.86

-2.20

SD

0.06

0.06

0.10

0.1

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.06

0.02

0.06

1.53

0.15

0.25

1.74

VFM

11.4

0.87

10.5

132

38.73

0.33

1.16

104

14.31

4.87

198

3.40

25.9

-3.00

SD

0.26

0.12

0.15

3.5

0.31

0.03

0.10

4.04

0.44

0.72

9.07

0.10

0.52

1.31

aMueller Hinton Broth (MHB), Cation Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB),, Veterinary Fastidious Medium (VFM), Columbia Broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHIB), Tryptic Soy broth (TSB) and Veterinary Fastidious Medium (VFM)

Fig. 1

Pie chart comparing the concentrations of constituents in eight matrices: Porcine serum, bovine serum, cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB), Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), Columbia broth supplemented with NAD (CB), Veterinary Fastidious Medium (VFM), Trypic Soy broth (TSB) and Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI). Highlighted with a star is one of the more notably important components, total protein

Protein, albumin and globulin

For the six broths, total protein concentration was low in MHB and CAMHB (3.23 and 4.10 g/L, respectively) but higher and similar for the four other broths (range 9.07–12.6 g/L). Serum total protein concentrations were higher, 79.3 g/L (pig) and 74.3 g/L (calf). For all broths, the principal protein constituent was globulin (range 3.23 to 12.5 g/L) whilst albumin concentrations were uniformly low, ranging from 0.00 to 0.87 g/L, for MHB and VFM, respectively. Albumin serum concentrations were much higher; 40.2 g/L (pig) and 38.1 g/L (calf). Expressed as serum:broth albumin concentration ratios, these ranged from greater than 400:1 for CAMHB to 46:1 for VFM.

Electrolytes

There were moderate differences in sodium concentration between the growth matrices; the lowest concentration was 118 mmol/L (TSB) and the highest was 168 mmol/L (BHI) and serum concentrations were intermediate, 153 and 148 mmol/L, for pig and calf, respectively. Similarly, serum chloride ion concentrations for pig and calf were intermediate (115 and 108 mmol/L, respectively) between the lowest, 79 mmol/L for TSB, and highest broth concentration of 123 mmol/L for BHI. MHB had the lowest potassium concentration (2.49 mmol/L) whereas the highest concentration was 39 mmol/L for VFM. Serum potassium concentrations were intermediate, 7.13 and 7.07 mmol/L for pig and calf, respectively.

With the exception of CAMHB, the concentration of calcium was much lower in broths, ranging from 0.05 to 0.33 mmol/L, in comparison with serum, 2.59 and 2.55 mmol/L for pig and calf, respectively. For CAMHB the calcium concentration was 5.21 mmol/L. Concentrations of magnesium were lower in three broths (0.23 mmol/L MHB, 0.25 mmol/L BHI and 0.18 mmol/L TSB) than in serum of pig and calf, 0.98 and 1.00 mmol/L, respectively, whereas concentrations in CAMHB, CB and VFM were higher, 4.20, 1.41 and 1.16, respectively.

Inorganic phosphorus, urea, creatinine and glucose

Broth inorganic phosphorus concentrations ranged from 2.55 mmol/L (MHB) to 14.3 mmol/L (VFM) and serum concentrations were similar to MHB, 2.82 and 3.28 mmol/L for pig and calf, respectively. Broth urea concentrations ranged from 0.93 mmol/L (MHB) to 5.97 mmol/L (BHI) and concentrations in serum were slightly less than the highest broth value, 4.67 and 5.23 mmol/L, pig and calf, respectively. In broths, creatinine concentration was lowest in MHB (61 μmol/L) and highest in BHI (418 μmol/L) and serum concentrations were intermediate (139 and 149 μmol/L, for pig and calf). Broth glucose concentrations ranged from 2.56 mmol/L (MHB and CAMHB) to 12.9 mmol/L (CB) whilst serum concentrations were intermediate, 5.47 mmol/L (pig) and 4.43 mmol/L (calf).

Iron and unsaturated iron binding capacity

Iron broth concentrations varied almost 10-fold, from 6.86 μmol/L (TSB) to 63.9 μmol/L (CB) and serum concentrations were intermediate, 19.1 μmol/L (pig) and 22.2 μmol/L (calf). Unsaturated iron binding capacity also varied widely (data not shown).

Bacterial growth in absence of antimicrobial drugs

Figures 2 and 3 illustrate bacterial growth rates of P. multocida and A. pleuropneumoniae, respectively. There were no apparent inter-isolate differences in P. multocida growth rates in CAMHB at 6 and 24 h. For all isolates at 6 h, bacterial counts had increased to 6-7x109CFU/mL in broth and at 24 h counts exceeded 1010 CFU/mL for all isolates. In serum, there was again minimal inter-isolate difference in growth of P. multocida at 6 h but the count, 5-6x107CFU/mL, was lower at this time than in CAMHB by some 2 × 102 CFU/mL. After 24 h, there was further increase in growth but there were some inter-isolate differences in count, which ranged from 8-10 × 1010 CFU/mL, and the serum count was somewhat lower than the 24 h count in CAMHB at this time.
Fig. 2

In vitro growth of P. multocida (n = 20 isolates) at time points 0, 6 and 24 h in CAMHB and pig serum (n = 20). Growth quantified in log10 CFU/mL (ordinate); each bar represents mean of triplicate analyses

Fig. 3

In vitro growth of A. pleuropneumoniae (n = 20 isolates) at time points 0, 6 and 24 h in VFM and pig serum. Growth quantified in log10 CFU/mL (ordinate); each bar represents mean of triplicate analyses

For A. pleuropneumoniae, bacterial growth was much slower initially (at 6 h) in both media than for P. multocida. At 6 h the mean CFU/mL count for 20 isolates was 5.37 × 105 in broth and in in serum it was significantly lower, 1.36x102CFU/mL. In contrast with P. multocida there was clear inter-isolate variability in growth rate at 6 h. However, by 24 h considerable growth had occurred and counts were of a similar order in both media, approaching or exceeding slightly 10log10 CFU/mL.

Discussion

For some drug classes, MICs measured in broths using internationally standardised procedures (for example, those of CLSI and EUCAST) may not differ significantly from potency estimated in biological fluids. The absence of growth matrix differences implies no significant impact on PK/PD breakpoint estimation, as a basis for dose determination, provided that the protein bound serum drug concentration is corrected for [4, 16, 20]. However, broth/biological fluid differences in potency do occur for other drug classes, even after correction for drug binding to proteins in biological fluids. For example, Honeyman et al. [21] compared potencies of several tetracyclines in broth and a 50% broth: 50% serum mixture. They established marked differences in MIC for the two growth matrices. Moreover, MICs differed and had to be determined on a matrix-by-matrix, species-by-species, compound-by-compound basis. Likewise, Brentnall et al. [10, 14] reported for oxytetracycline, after correction for serum protein binding, for a calf isolate of Mannheimia haemolytica, a MIC in serum 6 times greater than the broth MIC. In marked contrast, Toutain et al. [6] reported, after correction for serum protein binding, MICs some 80-fold smaller in calf serum compared to broth for tulathromycin for M. haemolytica and P. multocida isolates from calves. Similar findings, with quantitatively even lower MICs for Mycoplasma mycoides mycoides in calf serum compared to broth, were reported for the macrolides, tulathromycin and gamithromycin by Mitchell et al. [2224]. Thus, whilst correction for serum protein binding is always necessary, it is not always sufficient to account for potency differences between matrices.

These published data suggest: first, that serum MIC values should be considered on both a drug-by-drug and bacterial species-by-species basis to allow for the inactive protein bound fraction; and second, corrected serum values may not be the same as, and therefore might be used in preference to, the broth MIC for PK/PD breakpoint estimation.

Only free drug is microbiologically active and therefore protein binding is a major factor, and unfortunately sometimes the only factor, considered in seeking to explain growth medium differences in antimicrobial drug potency [2, 3, 9, 16, 20, 2527]. The magnitude of drug binding to serum protein can vary with methodology [16] and, moreover, for single drugs, intra-species differences have been reported. In addition, it is necessary to consider possible differences in protein binding in serum obtained from different sources, differing animal breeds, ages and indeed between healthy and diseased animals. Such variations must be borne in mind in considering the present findings, for which protein binding was determined for pig serum from a single source in healthy animals. In fact, for all three drugs investigated, the degree of binding was independent of total concentration over therapeutic ranges [1719].

For both organisms investigated in this study, correcting the serum MIC for protein binding for marbofloxacin, florfenicol and oxytetracycline yielded fu serum MICs differing from broth MICs in most instances. Fu serum:broth MIC ratios were: marbofloxacin 0.63:1 (P. multocida) and 0.35:1 (A. pleuropneumoniae); florfenicol 0.19:1 (P. multocida) and 0.38:1 (A. pleuropneumoniae); oxytetracycline 6.30:1 (P. multocida) and 0.35:1 (A. pleuropneumoniae). Thus, for marbofloxacin and florfenicol there were small to moderate trends for both pathogens of increased (1.6- to 5.2-fold) potency in serum compared to broth. Likewise, for oxytetracycline and A. pleuropneumoniae the greater potency in serum was 2.8-fold, whereas for P. multocida potency was 6.3-fold lower in serum. Consequently, correction of serum MIC for protein binding is, as stated, necessary but not sufficient for determination of potency differences between the two matrices for these two bacterial species and these three drugs. The consistent finding of differences, which were nevertheless unpredictable in direction (increased or reduced potency) and magnitude indicates the possibility of similar differences for human pathogens also more frequently than is commonly recognised.

Possibly the most important difference in chemical composition between all broths and serum was in albumin concentration, which was much higher in serum. Correction for drug binding to serum albumin revealed broth/serum potency differences for all drugs. It is therefore necessary to consider whether other differences, as well as albumin content, in chemical composition might explain the protein binding corrected potency differences. The chemical analyses indicated wide differences in composition of five broths for electrolytes, iron and organic compounds. Possibly surprisingly, these frequently large inter-broth differences resulted in, at most, very minor differences in MICs, with one exception, namely marbofloxacin, and for P. multocida only. However, even for this drug and species, MICs were similar for two broths and different but again similar for other three broths. In contrast, the broth and corrected serum MICs differed, despite the finding that chemical composition of pig serum for every analyte was within the lower and upper ranges for the five broths. Therefore, chemical composition indicated no readily apparent explanation for the broth/serum MIC differences.

In addition to the chemical differences between broths and serum, for circulating blood there are other differences e.g. the presence of white and red cells as well as a wide range of immunological components in blood. Future studies should therefore be directed towards evaluating which of these might interact with drugs, and how, to modulate drug potency. One factor, pH, is known to influence the rate and extent of growth of microorganisms [28, 29]. An effect of pH on weakly basic drugs such as macrolides and triamilides is well recognised [6].

Zeitlinger et al. [26] compared growth curves of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in MHB and serum. Slower logarithmic growth was obtained for both species in serum compared to broth, and this might be expected to provide more rapid kill in serum, as a consequence of a smaller microbial challenge [5, 30]. Indeed, Illambas et al. [31, 29] reported significant effects of inoculum count (high, medium and low) on MIC for marbofloxacin and florfenicol and the calf pneumonia pathogens, M. haemolytica and P. multocida, while Dorey et al. [1719] reported similar dependency of MIC on inoculum strength for the three drugs and the two pig pathogens investigated in this study.

In the present study, bacterial growth was initially greater in broths than serum for both P. multocida and A. pleuropneumoniae. This difference persisted for P. multocida at 24 h, whereas for A. pleuropneumoniae logarithmic growth was similar for the two media at this time. Slower growth, resulting potentially in lesser challenge to bacterial kill, therefore might explain, at least in part, the greater potency in serum compared to broth in five of six instances. The one notable exception, however, was the 6-fold reduction in potency of oxytetracycline in serum compared to broth for P. multocida. This finding indicates that some serum factor, presently unknown, operates to reduce potency of this drug for this species, whilst conversely potency was increased in serum for A. pleuropneumoniae.

The differences in MIC between serum and broth reported in this study do not provide a rationale for abandoning broths by diagnostic laboratories reporting MIC distributions of wild type organisms. This would be impractical and unnecessary. Rather, the present data suggest that, for marbofloxacin, florfenicol and oxytetracycline and the two bacterial species studied, it will be appropriate and possible to apply a scaling factor, to bridge between MICs in broths and pig serum when calculating PK/PD breakpoints.

Conclusion

For three commonly used drugs, florfenicol, oxytetracycline and marbofloxacin, and two pathogenic species of bacteria causing pig pneumonia, A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida, differences between serum and broth MICs were obtained, after correction was made for binding to serum protein. In contrast, major differences were not obtained when MICs were determined in five broths, marked differences in chemical composition between the broths notwithstanding. In the absence of drugs, the rate of logarithmic growth of A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida was slower in pig serum than in broth. It is suggested that, in using MIC data as a pharmacodynamic parameter to determine PK/PD breakpoints, the use of a scaling factor to bridge between broth and biological fluids may be required more commonly than currently recognised.

Highlights

  • For florfenicol, oxytetracycline and marbofloxacin and the pig pathogens, A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida, there were no major differences in MICs measured in five broths, widely differing in chemical composition.

  • Significant differences between serum and broth MICs were obtained, after correction for binding to serum protein, indicating that such correction is necessary but that it does not alone account for potency differences.

  • With one exception potency was greater in serum than broths.

  • In using MIC data to predict dosages for clinical use, the use of a scaling factor to bridge between broth and biological fluids may be required.

Abbreviations

ATCC: 

American Type Culture Collection

BHI: 

Brain Heart Infusion Broth

CAMHB: 

cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth

CB: 

Columbia Broth

CLSI: 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

EUCAST: 

Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

MHB: 

Mueller Hinton Broth

MIC: 

Minimum inhibitory concentration

NAD: 

Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide

PD: 

Pharmacodynamics

PK: 

Pharmacokinetics

TSB: 

Tryptic Soy Broth

VFM: 

Veterinary Fastidious Medium

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Lucy Dorey was a BBSRC CASE AWARD Scholar. A. Pridmore, Don Whitley Scientific, and A. Rycroft, Royal Veterinary College, supplied bacterial isolates.

Funding

This project was funded by a BBSRC and Norbrook Laboratories Ltd. CASE Award; grant number BB/101649X1.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article. Raw datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

LD and PL were responsible for the study design and co-ordination, data analysis and both were involved in writing the manuscript. LD conducted the experiments. Both authors approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Address: Comparative Biological Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London University, United Kingdom.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Campus

References

  1. Toutain PL, Lees P. Integration and modelling of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to optimize dosage regimens in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2004;27(6):467-7.Google Scholar
  2. Nielsen EI, Cars O, Friberg LE. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of antibiotic predicted by a semimechanistic PK/PD model: a step toward model-based dose optimization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4619–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Nielsen EI, Friberg LE. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic modeling of antibacterial drugs. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65(3):1053–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lees P, Pelligand L, Illambas J, Potter T, Lacroix M, Rycroft A, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration and modelling of amoxicillin for the calf pathogens Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2015;38(5):457–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Martinez MN, Papich MG, Drusano GL. Dosing regimen matters: the importance of early intervention and rapid attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(6):2795–805.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Toutain PL, Potter T, Pelligand L, Lacroix M, Illambas J, et al. Standard PK/PD concepts can be applied to determine a dosage regimen for a macrolide: the case of tulathromycin in the calf. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2016; doi: 10.1111/jvp.12333, in press.
  7. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals: Approved Standard - Fourth Edition. CLSI document VET01-A4 (formerly M31-A3, 2008) Supplementary information VET01-S, 2015. ISBN 1–56238–877-0 [print]; ISBN 1–56238–878-9 [electronic]. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 USA, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Papich MG. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling and the rational selection of dosage regimes for the prudent use of antimicrobial drugs. Vet Micro. 2014;171(3):480–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zeitlinger MA, Derendorf H, Mouton JW, Cars O, Craig WA, et al. Protein Binding: Do We Ever Learn? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3067–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brentnall C, Cheng Z, McKellar QA, Lees P. Pharmacodynamics of oxytetracycline administered alone and in combination with carprofen in calves. Vet Rec. 2012;171(11):273–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Aliabadi FS, Lees P. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danofloxacin in serum and tissue fluids of goats following intravenous and intramuscular administration. Amer J Vet Res. 2001;62(12):1979–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sidhu P, Landoni MF, Aliabadi FS, Lees P. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of marbofloxacin administered alone and in combination with tolfenamic acid in goats. Vet J. 2010;184(2):219–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Aliabadi FS, Lees P. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration of marbofloxacin in calf serum, exudate and transudate. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2002;25(3):161–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brentnall C, Cheng Z, McKellar QA, Lees P. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic integration and modelling of oxytetracycline administered alone and in combination with carprofen in calves. Res Vet Sci. 2013;94(3):687–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nightingale CH, Murakawa T. Microbiology and pharmacokinetics. In Microbiology and pharmacokinetics Eds Nightingale, C.H., Murakawa, T. Ambrose, P.G. Marcel Dekker, A.G. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2002. pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
  16. Barbour AM, Schmidt S, Zhuang L. Application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation for the prediction of target attainment of ceftobiprole against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using minimum inhibitory concentration and time–kill curve based approaches. Int J Antimicrob A. 2014;43(1):60–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorey L, Hobson S, Lees P. What is the true in vitro potency of oxytetracycline for the pig pneumonia pathogens A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida ? J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2016. doi:10.1111/jvp.12386.
  18. Dorey L, Hobson S, Lees P. Activity of florfenicol for the porcine pneumonia pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida using standardised versus non-standardised methodology. Vet J. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.11.004.
  19. Dorey L, Hobson S, Lees P. Potency of marbofloxacin for pig pneumonia pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida: comparison of growth media. Res Vet Sci. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.11.001.
  20. Gonzalez D, Schmidt S, Derendorf H. Importance of relating efficacy measures to unbound drug concentrations for anti-infective Agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(2):274–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Honeyman L, Ismail M, Nelson ML, Bhatia B, Bowser TE, Chen J, et al. Structure-activity relationship of the aminomethylcyclines and the discovery of omadacycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7044–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell JD, McKellar QA, McKeever DJ. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials against Mycoplasma mycoides mycoides small colony, the causative agent of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia: PLoS One 2012; v. 7, p. e44158.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell JD, Goh S, McKellar QA, DJ MK. In vitro pharmacodynamics of gamithromycin against Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides small Colony. Vet J. 2013;197(3):806–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell JD, McKellar QA, McKeever DJ. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity against Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides small Colony using an in vitro dynamic dilution pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(1):56–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wise R. The clinical relevance of protein binding and tissue concentrations in antimicrobial therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1986;11(6):470–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zeitlinger MA, Sauermann R, Traunmüller F, Georgopoulos A, Müller M, Joukhadar C. Impact of plasma protein binding on antimicrobial activity using time-killing curves. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54(5):876–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeitlinger M, Sauermann R, Fille M, Hausdorfer J, Leitner I, Müller M. Plasma protein binding of fluoroquinolones affects antimicrobial activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(3):561–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Russell JB, Dombrowski DB. Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980;39(3):604–10.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Illambas J, Potter T, Sidhu P, Rycroft AN, Cheng Z, et al. Pharmacodynamics of florfenicol for calf pneumonia pathogens. Vet Rec. 2013;172(13):340–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Drusano GL. What are the properties that make an antibiotic acceptable for therapy of community acquired pneumonia? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(suppl 3):iii61–iii67. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr100. PMID: 21482571Google Scholar
  31. Illambas J, Potter T, Cheng Z, Rycroft A, Fishwick J, et al. Pharmacodynamics of marbofloxacin for calf pneumonia pathogens. Res Vet Sci. 2013;94(3):675–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement