Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGII infection associated with lung disease in a goat

BMC Veterinary Research volume 13, Article number: 41 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cryptococcus gattii-induced cryptococcosis is an emerging infectious disease of humans and animals with worldwide distribution and public health importance due to its significant morbidity and mortality rate. The present study aimed to report a case of pulmonary infection by C. gattii molecular type VGII in State of São Paulo, Brazil.

Case presentation

A 5-year-old goat showing intermittent dry cough, ruminal tympany, anorexia, fever, tachycardia and tachypnea was presented for necropsy at the Veterinary Hospital of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil. Postmortem examination revealed numerous 2.0–6.0 cm diameter yellow gelatinous pulmonary masses. Tissues were evaluated by a combination of pathological, mycological, and molecular diagnostic techniques. Microscopically, pneumonia granulomatous, multifocal to coalescing, moderate, with many intralesional carminophilic yeasts was observed. The immunohistochemistry and mycological culture confirmed Cryptococcus spp. Internal transcribed spacers and orotidine monophosphate pyrophosphorylase nucleotide differentiation demonstrated that the isolate corresponds to the C. gattii VGII molecular subtype.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pulmonary infection in a goat linked to C. gattii molecular type VGII in Southeastern Brazil. Our findings emphasize the need for an active surveillance program for human and animal new infections to improve the current public health policies due to expansion of the epidemiological niche of this important microorganism.

Background

Cryptococcosis is a life-threatening systemic mycosis affecting humans and a large variety of animals. The two main pathogenic species are Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii [1]. C. neoformans, which has a worldwide distribution, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts (especially AIDS-patients) and commonly found in bird feces, nests, and tree bark. It is divided into the molecular types VN I and VN II (var. Grubii, serotype A), VN III (serotype AD), and VN IV (var. Neoformans, serotype D). Otherwise, C. gattii, which is found in leaves, tree bark, and fruits in tropical and subtropical areas as well as in eucalyptus flowers and usually infects immunocompetent hosts, is classified into serotypes B and C and into four molecular types: VGI, VGII, VGIII, and VGIV [2, 3].

There are reports of cryptococcosis in different domestic and wild animals. Dogs and cats become infected by inhalation of spores through the nasal cavity, and the infection spreads throughout the respiratory system and often reaches the nervous system. In horses, sheep, and goats, the lesions are restricted to the respiratory system; while in cattle, lesions are usually located in the mammary glands [4]. Wild animals such as koalas, snakes, ferrets, and porpoises can also be affected and show different clinical manifestations, which are restricted to lungs and central nervous system. In ferrets, Cryptococcus spp. can affect the gastrointestinal and respiratory systems such nasal cavity and eyes [5]. In contrast, there are few reports of cryptococcosis in birds because these animals are resistant to this fungal disease due to their high body temperature (41–43 °C) [6]. In humans, after inhalation, the disease progresses into the lungs, followed by involvement of the innate immune system, occurs tissue and macrophage invasion, and consequently, systemic dissemination [7].

In caprines, reports of pulmonary cryptococcosis are rare, and the main alterations observed include pleuropneumonia, nasal congestion, mucopurulent exudate, dyspnea, anorexia, and cachexia [8]. In Australia, skin granulomas on the head region and nasal cavity involvement were described in two goats [9, 10]. C. neoformans is rarely diagnosed as a pneumonia-causing agent [10], but according to Baró et al. [9], outbreaks in cattle and caprines have been reported. C. neoformans infection is occasionally reported in association with other diseases, such as caprine arthritis, encephalitis, pleuropneumonia, and neoplasms [11]. Thirteen autochthonous strains of C. gattii serotype B was recently reported to cause severe and disseminated pulmonary cryptococcosis in goats, as well as outbreaks of pneumonia, with cachexia and involvement of central nervous system in goats herds in Spain, however, molecular genotype was not identified [9]. In goats, C. gattii has been mainly associated with respiratory diseases, while C. neoformans mainly affects the central nervous system [12].

Cryptococcosis can be diagnosed by identification of oval and encapsulated budding organisms during cytologic examination of smears, histopathology, fungal isolation, culture and molecular tests [10] or in a pre-mortem diagnosis by cytology or antigen search in serum by latex agglutination [13]. Thus, the present study aimed to report a case of C. gattii molecular type VGII infection in a goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) as well as demonstrate and discuss the different diagnostic methods available for small ruminants.

Case presentation

A 5-year-old mixed-breed goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) was necropsied at Veterinary Hospital of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of São Paulo (HOVET/FMVZ-USP), São Paulo, Brazil. The animal belonged to a pre-school located in the municipality of Cotia, state of São Paulo, and was kept in a pasture during the day, along with a horse and three ewes. The goat was fed with alfalfa hay, feed and grazed in the pasture. The goat had a history of ruminal tympany, sternum and limb edema, tachycardia, tachypnea, anorexia, fever, and occasional diarrhea. Its owner reported that the animal had an intermittent dry cough and was treated with an orogastric tube in clinical crisis. However, the animal had several relapses over a few days and was taken to the HOVET/FMVZ-USP, when died during transportation.

A complete necropsy was performed, and the macroscopic findings indicated an adequate body condition. No ectoparasites, trauma signs, or marked abdominal distention were present. The gross lesion was restricted to the chest cavity, where 2.0 to 6.0 cm multiple nodular masses were observed in the lungs (Fig. 1a) in cranial and caudal portions of right cranial and in the middle lobes of lung. The nodules were soft and drained a large amount of yellow-whitish gelatinous content at cut (Fig. 1b). Other organs showed no macroscopic alterations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gross lesions of lungs. a The lung was distended and pink with reddish areas and there were multiple nodular areas in right cranial and middle lobes. Bar = 4 cm. b Nodular areas containing yellow-whitish gelatinous content. Bar = 2 cm

Full size image

Tissue samples were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin and cut in 5 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Mayer’s Mucicarmin for microscopical analyses. Microscopically, discrete alveolar edema and multifocal, well-circumscribed cavity areas were observed in the lungs. Within these foci there were mild to moderate lymphoplasmacytic and histiocytic inflammatory infiltrate, and rare neutrophils, associated with numerous round extracellular yeasts structures with variable capsular thickness, narrow-based budding, that measured approximately 5.0–20 μm in diameter (Fig. 2a), which stained weakly with HE and strongly stained the capsule by Mayer’s Mucicarmin (Fig. 2b). These areas were characterized of cryptococcomas.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lung photomicrography. a Well-circumscribed cavitations areas of granulomatous pneumonia associated pleomorphic, yeast structures with mucinous capsule of variable thickness which show clear and refractile halo (HE stain, bar = 25 μm). b Yeast in details with oval to round, and 5–20 μm in diameter organism’s structure which capsule (carminophilic) stain in red inside of cavitations areas (cryptococcomas). (Mayer’s Mucicarmin stain, bar = 50 μm). c Cryptococcal antigen was detected by immunohistochemistry using anti-Cryptococcus polyclonal antibody, 1:50,000 diluted. Positive yeast structures stained in strong brown for Cryptococcus spp. PictureMax Kit™, DAB stain, bar = 25 μm

Full size image

Samples of lung were collected during the necropsy and cultured in Sabouraud-dextrose broth and Sabouraud-dextrose agar with chloramphenicol (100 mg/l), incubated at 25 °C for three days or seven days, respectively, and evaluated daily. Samples grown in Sabouraud-dextrose broth were plated on Sabouraud-dextrose agar with chloramphenicol (100 mg/l), which was incubated as previously described. Beige, mucoid, bright, and viscous colonies with a milky aspect were subjected to morphological evaluation using China ink for capsule visualization. Biochemical tests such as urease, sugar assimilation (glucose, galactose, lactose, melibiose, and sucrose) and potassium nitrate (KNO3) tests, as well as evaluation of growth at 37 °C and in media containing cycloheximide, were performed. These tests were performed as described by Lacaz et al. [14] and Larone [15], and their results confirmed identification of the fungal agent as a member of the Cryptococcus spp. complex.

Histological sections of lungs were subjected to immunohistochemistry using antibody-specific for Cryptococcus spp. Histological sections (3 μm) were subjected to an antigen retrieval protocol in 10 mM citric acid solution (pH 6.0) in a pressure cooker for three minutes at 120 °C. Subsequently, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with H2O2 for 30 min, followed by non-specific binding blocking (Protein Block - PictureMax Kit™ Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) for 15 min. The anti-Cryptococcus polyclonal primary in house antibody was diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution with 1% bovine serum (pH 7.4; 1:50,000), and the slides were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. This primary antibody was purified from immunoglobulin fraction of rabbit antiserum, injected with an isolate of Cryptococcus gatti (LMM21) serotype B (MAT-alpha), VGII/AFLP6 as described by Kidd et al. [16] and Lourenço [17]. The antibody was tested in immunohistochemistry for reactivity with a variety of organisms. No cross-reactivity was observed with Histoplasma capsulatum, Candida, Pneumocystis carinii, Cryptosporidia and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Signal amplification was performed with a PictureMax Kit™ (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, the staining was revealed by 100 mg of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB D-5637; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) diluted in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37 °C for three minutes, and counter-staining was performed with Harris’ hematoxylin. Reaction was observed with an optical microscope, which confirmed the presence of structures that were positively stained and compatible with Cryptococcus spp. (Fig. 2c).

Genotype of fungus was achieved through PCR and sequencing. Initially, DNA was extracted from frozen lung tissue fragments, stored at -80 °C, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illustra tissue and cells genomic Prep Mini Spin Kit - GE Healthcare, USA). DNA quality and concentration were evaluated by analyzing the integrity and purity of the samples with a NanoDrop (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA).

PCR was performed based on the protocols of Mirhendi et al. [18] and Meyer et al. [19] using the primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′); URA5 (5′-ATGTCCTCCCAAGCCCTCGACTCCG-3′) and SJ01 (5′-TTAAGACCTCTGAACACCGTACTC-3′). Approximately 100 ng of DNA was used for each PCR reaction and FastStart PCR Master (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) in a 25 μl reaction volume. Solution was initially incubated at 94 °C for three minutes for denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for one minute, 58 °C for the first primer pair and 61 °C for the second primer pair for one minute, and 72 °C for one minute, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. Amplicons were visualized on a 2% agarose gel and photographed using an Image Master VDS (Pharmacia Biotech, USA). RNase and DNase free ultra-pure water was used as a negative control (UltraPure™DEPC- Treated Water, Invitrogen, USA). PCR product was sequenced by the Center for Human Genome Studies, Institute of Biosciences-USP after purification using a commercial kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, QIAgen, Hilden, Germany). For sequencing, 4 μL of BigDye 3 (BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit, Applied Biosystems, USA), 4 μL of 5X buffer, 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM ITS1, ITS4, URA5, and SJ01) in separate reactions, 40 ng of target DNA, and RNase- and DNase-free ultra-pure water were used for a final reaction volume of 20 μL in a capillary automated sequencer (ABIPrism 3730 DNA Analyser, Applied Biosystems, USA). The quality of the chromatograms generated for each primer (forward and reverse) of each sample was evaluated using the online application Phred (http://asparagin.cenargen.embrapa.br/phph/) and then manually edited using the Chromas Lite v. 2.1.1. software (http://technelysium.com.au/?page_id=13). The final sequence of each sample was obtained using the application Cap-contig of the BioEdit v.5.0.9 software (www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html) and subjected to a homology search for other sequences deposited in GenBank using the Blast 2.2.29 software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/).

The sequencing results showed 100% homology to a region of the internal transcript sequence 1 (ITS1) of the ribosomal DNA amplified with C. gattii strain [GenBank acc # JQ812708 (ATCC MYA-4877)] and 99% homology to IDR1100011626 (GenBank acc # JN675352). Moreover, orotidine monophosphate pyrophosphorylase gene (URA5) signature sequence from this isolate exactly matched that of C. gattii corresponds with PCR-fingerprint molecular type VGII.

Discussion

C. gattii is recognized as the main agent of endemic primary cryptococcosis in the North and Northeast (NE) Region of Brazil, where it is responsible for 89% of human cryptococcosis, and has the potential to cause life-threatening disease in immunocompetent hosts and [20]. The first VGII strain (LMM 293) identified in Brazil was isolated in Rio de Janeiro in 1988 from a patient coming from the NE [21]. In 1999, a total of 19 cases of cryptococcosis, nine of them caused by C. gattii infections, were described in children in Pará [22]. In the same region, an other study, showed that C. gattii is an endemic primary mycosis affecting HIV-negative hosts, with most cases caused by molecular type VGII, including an unexpectedly high number of children, [22, 23].

Most of the clinical isolates of VGII in the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo have been collected from patients born in Northeastern Brazil [24]. In South and Southeast Brazil, 43% of C. gattii infections are caused by VGII [21]. However, a diagnosis of meningoencephalitis caused by a VGII strain in a 5-year-old child who has lived all his life in the state of Rio de Janeiro suggests that the VGII strain may be spreading from the Northeast to Southeast region of Brazil. In addition, C. gattii has been the agent of one outbreak in captive psittacine birds in São Paulo, Brazil [25].

Also, C. gattii molecular type VGII was described as a primary emerging pathogen on Vancouver Island, Canada, and, subsequently, spread to people and animals in British Columbia, Washington and Oregon. Retrospective studies suggested that C. gattii may have circulated in Southern California for much longer. The mechanism of the switch from tropical to temperate climates is unknown. However, most eucalyptus associated outbreaks in Australia are of molecular type VGI, whereas 90% of isolates from the Pacific Northwest are type VGIIa, and southern California isolates are type VGIII, the genotype commonly identified in Mexico. This suggests that different genotypes have different biogeoclimatic distributions [26–28].

C. gattii can acts as a primary pathogen and causes endemic cryptococcosis, including meningoencephalitis, in HIV-negative patients. However, fully competent immune response in these hosts has been questioned, since infection with C. gattii is increasingly linked to the presence of various types of autoantibodies, which interfere with the host defenses, like anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [29].

Cryptococcus is the most common systemic mycosis in cats and often results in a severe disseminated disease in dogs [30]. According to Torres-Rodríguez et al. [31], the large number of cats and dogs diagnosed with cryptococcosis might be related to evident clinical signs, which facilitate the diagnosis. In other species of domestic animals such as cattle, horses, sheep, and goats, the final diagnosis depends on anatomopathological findings, which hinders the diagnosis. The increased incidence of disease associated with C. gattii can be attributed to three factors: environmental expansion, a lack of diagnostic tests, and the increased frequency of identification by molecular detection procedures [32]. Epidemiological studies of cryptococcosis are difficult because fungus species identification is rarely performed [33]. Byrnes et al. [34], emphasize that determination of the molecular type is very important in the clinical and epidemiological clarification of the disease, which highlights the importance of the present study.

Treatment options for cryptococcal infections are dependent on the severity and localization of the infection. In humans, treatment guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend treatment of severe cases of cryptococcosis in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients using induction therapy for 2 weeks with a combination of amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine, followed by 2 weeks of consolidation therapy using fluconazole [35]. Compared to C. neoformans, infections with C. gattii might need a more aggressive antifungal therapy due to the higher probability of severe neurological complications and possible delayed response to used antifungal compounds in humans [36]. It has been observed that in vitro antifungal susceptibilities significantly differ between genotype VGI and VGII C. gattii strains, which might affect the outcome of antifungal therapy, and which is an indication that in vivo differences may exist [35]. Dose and length of treatment with oral fluconazole for Cryptococcus spp. was established on available literature in horses, cats and dogs [37–39]. However, in ruminants, the bioavailability of oral medications usually varies from that in monogastric animals, so intravenous administration has been preferred. One goat with cryptococcal infection in cesarean incision site was treated daily with oral fluconazole for 6 months; however it demonstrated a cryptococcoma peritoneal recurrence after 2 years from the first diagnosis [12].

Despite the few epidemiological studies available in humans and animals, molecular subtype VGII does not seen to be a rare genotype of C. gattii in South America. In fact, it behaves as a primary fungal pathogen and causes endemic cryptococcosis in immunocompetent hosts in the northern region of Brazil, where it is particularly well-adapted to environmental biotypes associated with wood decay. However, this molecular type may be adapting to new areas in the southeast due to human activities and global climate change, or it may be present at a low density in the southeast, causing occasional human infections [21].

Conclusion

Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, microbiology, and molecular test are important to determine infectious agents and their differential diagnosis in cases of systemic respiratory diseases in small ruminants. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pulmonary infection linked to C. gattii molecular type VGII in a goat in state of São Paulo, Brazil. Our findings emphasize the need for an active surveillance program for human and animal infections due to expansion of the epidemiological niche of this important zoonotic microorganism.

Abbreviations

DAB:

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

HE:

Hematoxylin-eosin

HOVET/FMVZ-USP:

Veterinary Hospital of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of São Paulo

IDSA:

Infectious Diseases Society of America

ITS:

Internal transcript sequence

KNO3 :

Potassium nitrate

NE:

Northeast

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

URA5:

Orotidine monophosphate pyrophosphorylase gene

References

  1. Kwon-Chung KJ, Fraser JA, Doering TL, Wang Z, Janbon G, Idnurm A, Bahn YS. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(7):a019760.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Soares MLM, Bodo W, Santos LM, Luciana T, Gonçalves BG, de Lima MRC, et al. Genotypes of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii as agents of endemic cryptococcosis in Teresina, Piauí (northeastern Brazil). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106:725–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats. Fungal Diseases: An Emerging Threat to Human, Animal, and Plant Health: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Appendix A, Contributed Manuscripts. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83182/

  4. Duncan C, Stephen C, Campbell J. Clinical characteristics and predictors of mortality for Cryptococcus gattii infection in dogs and cats of southwestern British Columbia. Can Vet J. 2006;47:993–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ropstad EO, Leiva M, Peña T, Morera N, Martorell J. Cryptococcus gattii chorioretinitis in a ferret. Vet Ophthalmol. 2011;14(4):262–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castellá G, Abarca ML, Cabañes FJ. Criptococosis y animales de compañía. Revta Iberoam Micol. 2008;225:S19–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown SM, Campbell LT, Lodge JK. Cryptococcus neoformans: A Fungus Under Stress. Curr Opin Microb. 2007;10:320–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aller B, Santiago E, Escudero A. Criptococosis pulmonar en cabras. Revista del Patronato de Biología Animal. 1971;15:287–97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baró T, Torres-Rodríguez JM, De Mendoza MH, Morera Y, Alía C. First identification of autochthonous Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii isolated from goats with predominantly severe pulmonary disease in Spain. J Clin Microb. 1998;36:458–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, MC, Sherman, DM. Respiratory Sustem. In: Smith, MC.; Sherman, DM. Goat Medicine. 4. ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-blackwell, 2009. Cap. 9. p. 339-375.

  11. Gutiérrez M, García Marin JF. Cryptococcus neoformans and Mycobacterium bovis causing granulomatous pneumonia in a goat. Vet Pathol. 1999;36:445–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Villarroel A, Maggiulli TR. Rare Cryptococus gattii infection in an immunocompetent dairy goat following a cesarean section. Med Mycol. 2012;1:91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robson K, Smith PM. Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in a dog. Vet Rec. 2011;168:538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacaz CS, Porto E, Martins JEC, Heins-Vaccari EM, Melo NT. Tratado de Micologia Médica. Sarvier: São Paulo; 2002. p. 1104.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larone DH. Medically important fungi, A guide to identification. 3rd ed. Washington: ASM Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kidd SE, Hagen F, Fyfe M. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:17258–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenço MGF. Alterações histopatológicas iniciais pulmonares na infecção aguda experimental de camundongos Swiss webster imunocompetentes por Cryptococcus neoformans e C. gatti. 2008. Thesis (Doctorate in parasite biology) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro.

  18. Mirhendi H, Diba K, Rezaei A, Jalalizand N, Hosseinpur L, Khoda- dadi H. PCR is a rapid and sensitive method for DNA amplification in yeasts. Iran J Public Health. 2007;36:40–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer W, Castañeda A, Jackson S, Huynh M, Castañeda E. Molecular typing of Ibero American Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:189–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishikawa MM, Lazera MS, Barbosa GG, Trilles L, Balassiano BR, Bezerra CF, Perez MA, Cardareli P, Wanke B. Serotyping of 467 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from clinical and environmental sources in Brazil: analysis of host and regional patterns. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:73–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Trilles L, Lazera M, Wanke B, Oliveira RV, Barbosa GG, Nishikawa MM, Morales BP, Meyer W. Regional pattern of the molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103:455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Corrêa MPSC, Oliveira EC, Duarte RRBS, Pardal PPO, Oliveira FM, Severo LC. Criptococose em crianças no estado do Pará. Brasil Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32:505–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos WRA, Meyer W, Wanke B, Costa SPSE, Trilles L, Nascimento JLM, Medeiros R, Morales BP, Bezerra CCF, Macêdo RCL, Ferreira SO, Barbosa GG, Perez MA, Nishikawa MM, Lazéra MS. Primary endemic cryptococcosis gattii by molecular type VGII in the state of Pará. Brazil Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103:813–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rozenbaum R, Gonçalves AJ. Clinical epidemiological study of 171 cases of cryptococcosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:369–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raso TF, Werther K, Miranda T, Mendes-Giannini MJS. Cryptococcosis outbreak in psittacine birds in Brazil. Med Mycol. 2004;42:355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraser JA, Giles SS, Wenink EC, Geunes-Boyer SG, Wright JR, Diezmann S, Allen A, Stajich JE, Dietrich FS, Perfect JR, Heitman J. Same-sex mating and the origin of the Vancouver Island Cryptococcus gattii outbreak. Nature. 2005;27:1360–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kidd SE, Bach PJ, Hingston AO, Mak S, Chow Y, MacDougall L, Kronstad JW, Bartlett KH. Cryptococcus gattii dispersal mechanisms, British Columbia, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Upton A, Fraser JA, Kidd SE, Bretz C, Bartlett KH, Heitman J, Marr KA. First contemporary case of human infection with Cryptococcus gattii in Puget Sound: evidence for spread of the Vancouver Island outbreak. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3086–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Saijo T, Chen J, Chen SC, Rosen LB, Yi J, Sorrell TC, Bennett JE, Holland SM, Browne SK, Kwon-Chung KJ. Anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies are a risk factor for central nervous system infection by Cryptococcus gattii in otherwise immunocompetent patients. M Bio. 2014;18(5):e00912–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singer LM, Meyer W, Firacative C, Thompson 3rd GR, Samitz E, Sykes JE. Antifungal drug susceptibility and phylogenetic diversity among Cryptococcus isolates from dogs and cats in North America. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2061–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Torres-Rodriguez JM, Mendoza MH, Alvarado-Ramirez E, Segura-Roca G. Cryptococcosis by Cryptococcus gattii in immunocompetent goats in Spain and review of the literature. Acta Sci Vet. 2006;34:245–53.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lester SJ, Malik R, Bartlett KH, Duncan CG. Cryptococcosis: update and emergence of Cryptococcus gattii. Vet Clin Pathol. 2011;40:4–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marr KA. Cryptococcus gattii as an important fungal pathogen of western North America. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10:637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Byrnes 3rd EJ, Li W, Lewit Y, Ma H, Voelz K, Ren P, Carter DA, Chaturvedi V, Bildfell RJ, May RC, Heitman J. Emergence and pathogenicity of highly virulent Cryptococcus gattii genotypes in the northwest United States. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000850.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:291–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hagen F, Illnait-Zaragozi MT, Bartlett KH, Swinne D, Geertsen E, Klaassen CH, et al. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities and AFLP genotyping of a worldwide collection of 350 clinical, veterinary and environmental Cryptococcus gattii isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Graves TK, Barger AM, Adams B, Krockenberger MB. Diagnosis of systemic cryptococcosis by fecal cytology in a dog. Vet Clin Pathol. 2005;34:409–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Brien CR, Krockenberger MB, Martin P, Wigney DI, Malik R. Long-term outcome of therapy for 59 cats and 11 dogs with cryptococcosis. Aust Vet J. 2006;84:384–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hart KA, Flaminio MJ, LeRoy BE, Williams CO, Dietrich UM, Barton MH. Successful resolution of cryptococcal meningitis and optic neuritis in an adult horse with oral fluconazole. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22:1436–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the histological support given by Cláudio Arroyo and Luciano Antas Bugalho at the Department of Pathology.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) to support the English correction and publication fees.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ECS, LNT, AMDL, DMR, RGG and LRMS performed the necropsy and described the macroscopical and microscopical alterations. CCM and FJB were involved in the clinical management of the case. RAR performed the immunohistochemistry reaction. PAM performed the microbiological analysis. JMG was involved in the molecular analysis. ECS, JMG, LRMS and BC revised the manuscript critically, and provided helpful discussion and final correction to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed by the approved veterinarians in the course of routine veterinary health management.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Departamento de Patologia, Serviço de Patologia Animal – Hospital Veterinário (HOVET), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, Brazil

      Evelin Catarine da Silva, Juliana Mariotti Guerra, Luciana Neves Torres, Alessandra Maria Dias Lacerda, Raquel Gonçalves Gomes, Danilo Marin Rodrigues, Lílian Rose Marques de Sá & Bruno Cogliati

    2. Instituto Adolfo Lutz (IAL) - Centro de Patologia, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 351 – 7o. Andar – Sala 705 - Pacaembú, São Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil

      Juliana Mariotti Guerra & Rodrigo Albergaria Réssio

    3. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, Brazil

      Priscilla Anne Melville

    4. Clínica de Bovinos e Pequenos Ruminantes – Hospital Veterinário (HOVET), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-900, Brazil

      Camila Cecilia Martin & Fernando José Benesi

    Authors
    1. Evelin Catarine da Silva
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Juliana Mariotti Guerra
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Luciana Neves Torres
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Alessandra Maria Dias Lacerda
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Raquel Gonçalves Gomes
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Danilo Marin Rodrigues
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Rodrigo Albergaria Réssio
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Priscilla Anne Melville
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Camila Cecilia Martin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Fernando José Benesi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Lílian Rose Marques de Sá
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Bruno Cogliati
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Bruno Cogliati.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    da Silva, E.C., Guerra, J.M., Torres, L.N. et al. Cryptococcus gattii molecular type VGII infection associated with lung disease in a goat. BMC Vet Res 13, 41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0950-6

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0950-6

    Keywords

    BMC Veterinary Research

    ISSN: 1746-6148

    Contact us