Skip to main content
Download PDF

Physiological and analgesic effects of continuous-rate infusion of morphine, butorphanol, tramadol or methadone in horses with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced carpal synovitis

BMC Veterinary Research volume 10, Article number: 966 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Continuous-rate infusion (CRI) of drugs results in more stable plasma drug concentrations than administration of intermittent boluses, thus providing greater stability of physiological parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiologic and analgesic effects of the administration of morphine, butorphanol, tramadol or methadone by CRI in horses with induced synovitis of the radiocarpal joint.

Results

Increased values of cardiorespiratory parameters and body temperature were observed in all groups after initiation of opioid administration, and these increases were sustained throughout the CRI period. Morphine, butorphanol and methadone each caused a reduction in gut sounds, and this effect was greatest in animals that received morphine. Administration of morphine or methadone reduced the degree of lameness after the end of intravenous infusion. Administration of tramadol did not alter the degree of lameness in the animals.

Conclusions

CRI of morphine or methadone, but not butorphanol or tramadol, provided analgesia in horses with carpal synovitis. All of these opioids increased cardiovascular and respiratory parameters and reduced gut sounds during CRI.

Background

Despite the analgesia provided by opioids, in pain free horses they may procude dose-dependent central nervous system (CNS) excitation [1]-[3], increased spontaneous locomotor activity [4] and reduced intestinal motility [5],[6]. Ataxia, shivering and restlessness have been reported in horses that received a single IV injection of 0.1 mg/kg butorphanol [7],[8]. The same side effects have been reported for IV injection of 0.5 mg/kg methadone [9]. Tramadol also elicited undesirable effects, especially muscle twitching and head nodding, after 1.5 or 3 mg/kg rapid IV administration [10]. Clinically relevant doses of morphine (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) yielded minimal and short-term cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal and behavioural effects, but analgesia was only achieved for a short period of time in healthy conscious horses with no signs of pain [11]. The dose, route, and duration of the opioid treatment likely influenced whether adverse effects developed and the severity of those effects [6],[12].

The use of CRI minimises changes in plasma concentrations, which are frequent in intermittent bolus administrations. Side effects may be less likely to occur during CRI because the total dose of the drug over time is lower than the total administered boluses [7],[13]. CRI of morphine during inhalation anaesthesia did not promote any haemodynamic or pulmonary changes [14], and it provided a shorter, better-quality anaesthetic recovery compared to the no-morphine group [14],[15]. CRI of butorphanol caused a lower incidence of behavioural and gastrointestinal alterations and lower plasma cortisol levels than the saline group in horses after celiotomy [16]. Moreover, those horses displayed less weight loss while hospitalised and recovered quickly.

However, some studies report no advantages for CRI of opioids in horses. Bettschart-Wolfensberger et al. [17] observed no isoflurane-sparing effect with CRI of butorphanol, and animals that had received this opioid showed longer times to extubation than receiving only medetomidine [17]. Villalba et al. [18] reported that morphine did not improve the isoflurane-sparing effect in horses undergoing CRI of ketamine plus lidocaine [18]. In another study, CRI of morphine showed no advantages over CRI of dexmedetomidine in isoflurane-anaesthetised horses undergoing elective surgery [19]. Furthermore, horses treated with morphine developed post-operative colic and excitatory behaviour. To the authors’ knowledge, no studies to date have determined whether a bolus dose followed by CRI of tramadol or methadone provides analgesia in horses or whether it has an influence on horse physiology.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological and analgesic effects of the administration of morphine, butorphanol, tramadol or methadone by CRI in horses subjected to synovitis induced by injection of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into the radiocarpal joint.

Methods

This study was approved by the University of São Paulo Animal Care Committee, under protocol number 2012.1.106.74.4. Fourteen adult horses from the University of São Paulo farm were used in the experiment, 9 females and 5 males weighing between 350 and 500 kg, and they were considered clinically healthy as assessed by clinical examination and laboratory tests (complete blood count, and biochemical profile). The study consisted of four experimental groups, with each animal participating in two out of the four conditions. The washout period between the treatments was at least one month.

For induction of synovitis, 0.5 ng of LPS of the Escherichia coli strain 055:B5 (E. coli 055:B5; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) was aseptically administered into the right or left radiocarpal joint according to the experimental design. The LPS was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) to a final volume of 1 mL for each administration. After clinical examination of the physiological parameters (baseline), the animals were sedated with 1 mg/kg xylazine IV (Sedazine - Schering-Plough, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). Once sedated, the horses were given an intra-articular administration of LPS [20].

Only two of the horses were submitted to a trial study without any opioid treatment. The trial study revealed that within three hours post-induction of synovitis, there was already an evident degree of lameness (3 or 4). Accordingly, three hours after LPS injection, jugular venipuncture was performed with a 14G catheter and used for the administration of one of four CRI treatments: morphine (Mo, bolus of 0.15 mg/kg followed by CRI of 0.1 mg/kg/h morphine; Dimorf 10 mg/mL, Cristalia Prod Quim Farm Ltda, Itapira, SP, Brazil), butorphanol (B, bolus of 25 μg/kg followed by CRI of 25 μg/kg/h butorphanol; Torbugesic, Fort Dodge Saude Animal Ltda, Campinas, SP, Brazil), tramadol (T, bolus of 1.5 mg/kg followed by CRI of 1 mg/kg/h tramadol; Tramadon, Cristalia Ltda, Itapira, SP, Brazil) or methadone (Me, bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by CRI of 0.25 mg/kg/h methadone; Mytedon 10 mg/mL, Cristalia Ltda, Itapira, SP, Brazil). All treatments were assigned in a randomised manner. The bolus and infusions were administered using a syringe infusion pump (DigiPump SR8x, Digicare Animal Health, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) and maintained for three hours, where the volumes were standardised with a bolus of 17 mL/10 min and CRI of 50 mL/h such that the observers were blinded to the treatment.

Physiological parameters and analgesia were evaluated before sedation (baseline) and 1.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 24 hours after induction of synovitis. Heart rate (HR) was determined with a stethoscope between the 3rd and 6th intercostal space and was measured in beats per minute (bpm). Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in mmHg was measured non-invasively using an ultrasonic Doppler (Doppler, model 841 A, Parks Medical Electronics) with the transducer positioned over the coccygeal artery at the base of the tail. The measurements were taken with the cuff positioned cranially to the transducer such that the cuff’s width was half the diameter of the tail [21]. The respiratory rate (RR) was measured by manually counting chest movements per minute (mpm), and the core body temperature (T°C) was measured with a flexible digital thermometer (Pro-Check, ONBO Electronics, USA) inserted approximately 3 cm into the rectum.

Gut sounds were evaluated by abdominal auscultation, dividing the right lateral flank into two portions and determining the opening of the ileocecal valve (dorsal portion) and the right ventral colon (ventral portion). The same procedure was performed on the left side. Each quadrant was auscultated for one minute, with an interval of a few seconds between quadrants. Scores of 0 to 4 were noted and later summed, resulting in values between 0 and 16 [1].

To assess lameness, the horses were recorded while being led at a walk and at a trot in a straight line (50 metres) on a hard surface. The images were analysed in a random order, after the end of all treatments, by an experienced observer (Dr. Dória) who was unaware of the treatments used and the time of each measurement. The lameness was scored as follows: 0, absence of visible lameness; 1, discrete asymmetry, occasionally inconsistent; 2, visible lameness, rarely inconsistent; 3, visible lameness at all times; and 4, no weight bearing [22]. The highest scores for walking or trotting were considered for statistical purposes. At each evaluation point, physiological parameters were measured before each lameness assessment. CRI of the opioid was interrupted for only two minutes at 3, 4 and 5 hours so that the animal’s walking and trotting could be filmed.

Rescue analgesia was administered to animals that showed after each evaluation, a lameness score of 3 or 4 and that did not show any improvement of gait, or that showed any signs of moderate to severe pain at 6 hours (end of CRI). This was evaluated by one experienced observer (Dr. Carregaro) who was unaware of all treatments. For rescue analgesia, 0.1 mg/kg morphine and 1 mg/kg flunixin meglumine were administered IV. The animals were then continuously monitored to check the improvement of their clinical status. All animals were given 1 mg/kg flunixin meglumine IV once a day for three days after the evaluation period.

Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The parametric variables HR, SAP, RR and T°C were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s post-test for comparisons of means within each group in relation to baseline. Comparisons between groups at each time were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The Friedman test was utilised for the non-parametric variables gut sounds and lameness. The parametric results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the non-parametric results were expressed as the median and interquartile range. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

At 3 hours, all animals showed signs of pain, such as lowered head, reluctance to move, and a peculiar facial expression [23] with stiffly backward ears, orbital tightening, strained nostrils and flattening of the profile. During CRI, signs of restlessness were observed in two animals in the B group, two in the Mo group and one in the Me group. These animals showed continuous head nodding, digging, and shifting of limbs. In contrast, the other animals in the same groups remained calm during CRI. No animal in the T group showed excitation, but all animals were unable to stand on the affected leg and shifted weight to their hind legs. Skin twitching was also observed in four animals in the T group and three in the Me group, particularly in the upper regions of the forelimbs and the dorsolateral area of the thorax and abdomen, especially during the first 30 minutes after bolus injection.

All groups showed an increase in cardiorespiratory parameters after the beginning of the treatments, with a marked increase in HR in animals of the B and Mo groups and in SAP in all groups. After the end of the treatments (6 hours), the parameters gradually returned to the baseline values. Temperature increased in the Mo, B and T groups; it increased between 4 hours and 7 hours in the T group (the last time point evaluated in this group) and to 14 hours in the Mo, Me and B groups (Figure 1). There was a marked decline in gut sounds in the Mo group at 4 hours, and this effect persisted up to 8 hours. Additionally, reduced gut sounds were observed in the Me and B groups during the infusion period. This effect was not observed in the T group (Figure 1). Notably, all animals in the T group defaecated at least once during the three hours in the stock. Defaecation was also observed for two animals in the B group and for none in the Mo and Me groups.

Figure 1
figure1

Effects of 0.25 mg/kg + 0.25 mg/kg/h methadone (Me), 0.15 mg/kg + 0.1 mg/kg/h morphine (Mo), 25 μg/kg + 25 μg/kg/h butorphanol (B), and 1.5 mg/kg + 1 mg/kg/h tramadol (T) on heart rate (HR – 1A; bpm – beats/minute), systolic arterial pressure (SAP – 1B; mmHg), respiratory rate (RR – 1C; bpm – breaths/minute), core body temperature (T°C – 1D; °C), and gut sounds score (1E) of horses (n = 6) submitted to the experimental synovitis model. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. Treatments were at 3 to 6 hours (in grey). The pilot study was conducted with 2 horses that received no opioid treatment (--- Trial). *Within each group, values differ significantly (P < 0.05) from the baseline value (0 minute). Values at the same time point in squares/rectangles indicate no significant difference (P < 0.05).

Full size image

Lameness was moderate at 1.5 hours and severe at 3 hours after LPS injection [22]. After 3 hours, and as in the pilot study, practically all animals showed the maximal degree of lameness except for two animals in the T group and one animal in the Me group, which showed a score of 3. During CRI, gradual improvement was noted in the Mo and Me groups. Moreover, both groups demonstrated better lameness scores, starting at 6 hours, whereas the animals in the B group only showed improvement starting at 8 hours. No improvement was observed in the animals in the T group (Table 1).

Table 1 Degree of lameness of horses (n = 6) submitted to the experimental synovitis model and treated with 0.25 mg/kg + 0.25 mg/kg/h methadone (Me), 0.15 mg/kg + 0.1 mg/kg/h morphine (Mo), 25 μg/kg + 25 μg/kg/h butorphanol (B), and 1.5 mg/kg + 1 mg/kg/h tramadol (T)
Full size table

All animals in the T group required rescue analgesia at the end of the treatment, among which four were rescued at 6 hours and two at 7 hours. Two animals in the B group were rescued at 6 hours, and only one animal in the Mo group was rescued at the same time. None of the animals in the Me group required rescue analgesia. All rescued animals showed improvement that was evident approximately 15 minutes after treatment. After an hour, lameness was minimal or absent, and the physiologic parameters were close to normal for the species. The data obtained after rescue are not shown and were not considered for statistical evaluation. All animals, rescued or not, showed normal mobility at 24 hours post LPS injection.

Discussion

Our results showed a marked reduction in the lameness of animals treated with morphine or methadone, demonstrating that CRI treatments were reasonably effective against experimentally induced inflammatory joint pain. Moreover, there was no need for rescue analgesia in animals treated with methadone. Methadone has a mu-receptor affinity similar to the affinity of morphine [24], but one should consider that the dose of methadone was twice as high as the morphine dose and must have contributed to the higher analgesic effect. Information about the analgesic effects of methadone in horses is limited, but recently, it was demonstrated that a single IV dose of 0.2 mg/kg did not produce a consistent antinociceptive effect to thermal and electrical stimuli. The administration of 0.5 mg/kg induced short-acting antinociception but may have been limited due to adverse behavioural effects and ataxia in horses [9].

To the authors’ knowledge, there are no published studies in which only morphine administered as a CRI was used as a unique treatment in clinical studies of horses. The available studies report the antinociceptive effects of morphine in inhalation anaesthesia [14] or combined with other analgesics [18],[25],[26]. The morphine dose chosen for treatment was the same as that used in the studies of Clark et al., who showed that horses receiving morphine during the anaesthetic period tended to receive fewer and lower doses of additional anaesthetic drugs in the intra- and postoperative periods [14] and to recover better from the anaesthesia [15] than control animals.

The bolus dose and CRI of butorphanol were in accordance with those used by other authors [16],[27],[28]. However, it should be noted that there was no standardisation of the dose or of the time of infusion. Even less information is available for tramadol and methadone in horses, which still have not been tested using CRI in this species. The choice of the tramadol doses was based on Grond & Sablotzki (2004) [29], who noted that the potency was approximately 10% of that of morphine. As no studies using methadone administered by CRI in horses exist, the bolus and CRI rate were established based on Linardi et al. [30], who showed that a single 0.15 mg/kg dose of methadone was insufficient to promote analgesia, and based on Oliveira et al. [9], who studied two doses of methadone (0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) and observed that the higher dose promoted intense ataxia.

One study showed that morphine failed to promote analgesia when administered in a single dose to treat thermal and electrical noxious stimuli [11]. A single dose (0.25 mg/kg) of morphine did not cause an appreciable change in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane, and it was not indicated for routine clinical use as an adjuvant to isoflurane anaesthesia in horses [31]. However, both studies were performed with an electrical and/or thermal stimulus, which may not represent inflammatory pain. As noted for CRI, Clark et al. [14] suggested that a dose of 0.15 mg/kg followed by 0.1 mg/kg/h of morphine appeared to produce analgesia in animals undergoing surgery. However, this study did not state how long the infusion was administered; this parameter could have influenced the results, as the results obtained here only demonstrated efficacy after 3 hours of infusion.

CRI of butorphanol decreased lameness only at 8 hours. Nonetheless, the results should be interpreted with caution, as two animals required rescue analgesia (Dr. Carregaro’s evaluation), and the lameness scores were higher than those after morphine and methadone treatment, demonstrating a clinical difference. Furthermore, if the lameness scores indicated by Dr. Dória were considered for establishing rescue analgesia, not two but rather five horses should have received it, demonstrating the ineffectiveness of CRI with butorphanol. Although the observers were experienced in the evaluation of lameness in horses, it should be noted that variations can occur, mainly because of the use of subjective scales [32], thereby resulting in differences among the authors’ scores.

We were not able to demonstrate analgesia with tramadol. The analgesic action of tramadol in horses has been studied in the past few years, but only one study reports transient analgesia in horses with pain caused by chronic laminitis. In that study, tramadol alone (orally at 5 mg/kg every 12 h) provided limited pain relief, and it was only effective when combined with CRI of ketamine [33].

The lack of analgesia may have resulted from the biotransformation of tramadol in the horses. In horses, tramadol likely undergoes hepatic biotransformation [34] and also produces at least five metabolites [35],[36]. The main active metabolite of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, acts on opioid receptors. N-desmethyltramadol is the inactive metabolite [34]. Although it has been suggested that N-desmethyltramadol is the major metabolite produced [34],[35], recent studies have demonstrated that horses are very efficient in metabolising tramadol to O-desmethyltramadol (phase I reaction). However, the latter metabolite is rapidly and extensively conjugated with glucuronic acid (phase II reaction) such that the fraction of nonconjugated O-desmethyltramadol in plasma is truly low [10],[37],[38]. In light of this biotransformation, we proposed a treatment of CRI with tramadol in horses. Thus, it was speculated that the accumulation of O-desmethyltramadol, combined with other pathways of action for tramadol, could provide analgesia, but the results showed no effect for tramadol. Another possibility is that the lack of analgesia may have resulted from the dose chosen, which may have been sub-therapeutic.

Prior to CRI opioid administration, there was a slight increase in cardiorespiratory parameters in all groups, indicating the physiological effects of the pain model that was used. Regarding morphine and butorphanol, some papers report an absence of cardiovascular alterations upon CRI administration to horses. The use of butorphanol was not associated with cardiovascular changes, even during a 24-hour infusion [7]. Another study also showed that morphine did not induce cardiovascular changes in horses, but the animals were under inhalation anaesthesia [14]. Additionally, restlessness may have induced the increase in these parameters in the Mo, B and Me groups. Despite the lack of differences among the groups during CRI, higher SAP values were observed in all animals; they markedly decreased after the infusions, indicating that the opioids increased the SAP values [24],[27],[39].

We also suggest that the physiologic changes in the T group may have resulted from the synovitis model, mainly considering the ineffectiveness of tramadol. This idea is reinforced by the few studies that report no substantial changes in cardiovascular parameters, even with such higher doses as 2 and 5 mg/kg of tramadol [40]-[42]. In relation to the influence of pain and opioids on cardiovascular parameters, the inclusion of a real control group, i.e., a synovitis-only group, could have addressed this concern. However, for ethical reasons, such a group was not used.

Despite the reduced doses of opioids used during the CRI in this study, reduced gut sounds were still observed from the start of the infusion of butorphanol, methadone and especially of morphine. Thus, not only the pure agonists but also butorphanol caused a reduction in gut sounds. In other studies, gut sounds did not vary significantly either during or after CRI of butorphanol, but the number of faecal piles passed during the 24-hour treatment period was reduced [7],[16]. This finding should be carefully considered because of the strong call for the use of butorphanol in horses, as this drug theoretically has little influence on gut sounds. No changes in gut sounds were observed in the T group, corroborating other authors [33],[40]. In contrast, another study reported a case of mild colic in one horse after six consecutive doses of 10 mg/kg tramadol. Thus, gastrointestinal depression with tramadol may not be common, but it is possible.

Hyperthermia was observed in the Mo, B and T groups and could have occurred as a result of the direct LPS action on the thermoregulatory centre and through the synthesis and secretion of endogenous pyrogens from neutrophils and mononuclear phagocytes, which are released as a result of joint inflammation [43]. However, given that the Me group animals did not show hyperthermia, methadone may also have anti-inflammatory properties [44].

Some limitations should be considered in the present study. The inclusion of a control group could show the influence of pain and opioid on cardiovascular parameters. In addition, if a dose–response study had been performed, we could have drawn a proper comparison between the analgesic effects of morphine and methadone and even examined the reason why tramadol and butorphanol were not effective as administered in this study. Furthermore, it is important to point out that the dose of methadone was twice as high as the morphine dose, which must have contributed to the superior analgesic effect of methadone over morphine.

Conclusions

Infusions of morphine and methadone reduced the pain of horses with carpal synovitis. However, it is suggested that CRI of these opioids in horses can increase cardiovascular and respiratory variables in addition to causing reduced gut sounds.

Abbreviations

CRI:

Continuous rate infusion

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

IV:

Intravenous

Mo:

Morphine group

B:

Butorphanol group

T:

Tramadol group

Me:

Methadone group

HR:

Heart rate

SAP:

Systolic arterial pressure

RR:

Respiratory rate

T°C:

Core body temperature

References

  1. 1.

    Carregaro AB, Neto FJ, Beier SL, Luna SP: Cardiopulmonary effects of buprenorphine in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2006, 67 (10): 1675-1680. 10.2460/ajvr.67.10.1675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Szoke MO, Blais D, Cuvelliez SG, Lavoie JP: Effects of buprenorphine on cardiovascular and pulmonary function in clinically normal horses and horses with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Vet Res. 1998, 59 (10): 1287-1291.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sanchez LC, Robertson SA, Maxwell LK, Zientek K, Cole C: Effect of fentanyl on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses. J Vet Intern Med. 2007, 21 (5): 1067-1075. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb03066.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Carregaro AB, Luna SP, Mataqueiro MI, de Queiroz-Neto A: Effects of buprenorphine on nociception and spontaneous locomotor activity in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2007, 68 (3): 246-250. 10.2460/ajvr.68.3.246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Senior JM, Pinchbeck GL, Dugdale AH, Clegg PD: Retrospective study of the risk factors and prevalence of colic in horses after orthopaedic surgery. Vet Rec. 2004, 155 (11): 321-325. 10.1136/vr.155.11.321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boscan P, Van Hoogmoed LM, Farver TB, Snyder JR: Evaluation of the effects of the opioid agonist morphine on gastrointestinal tract function in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2006, 67 (6): 992-997. 10.2460/ajvr.67.6.992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sellon DC, Monroe VL, Roberts MC, Papich MG: Pharmacokinetics and adverse effects of butorphanol administered by single intravenous injection or continuous intravenous infusion in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2001, 62 (2): 183-189. 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kalpravidh M, Lumb WV, Wright M, Heath RB: Analgesic effects of butorphanol in horses: dose–response studies. Am J Vet Res. 1984, 45 (2): 211-216.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Oliveira FA, Pignaton W, Teixeira-Neto FJ, Queiroz-Neto A, Puoli-Filho JNP, Scognamillo MVR, Viveiros BM, Luna SPL: Antinociceptive and behavioral effects of methadone alone or in combination with detomidine in conscious horses. J Equine Vet Sci. 2014, 34 (3): 380-386. 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Knych HK, Corado CR, McKemie DS, Steffey EP: Pharmacokinetics and selected pharmacodynamic effects of tramadol following intravenous administration to the horse. Equine Vet J. 2013, 45 (4): 490-496. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00688.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Figueiredo JP, Muir WW, Sams R: Cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, and analgesic effects of morphine sulfate in conscious healthy horses. Am J Vet Res. 2012, 73 (6): 799-808. 10.2460/ajvr.73.6.799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Combie J, Doughesty J, Nugent E, Tobin T: The pharmacology of narcotic analgesics in the horse. IV. dose and time response relationships for behavioral responses to morphine, meperidine, pentazocine, anileridine, methadone, and hydromorphone. J Equine Med Surg. 1979, 3: 377-385.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lucas AN, Firth AM, Anderson GA, Vine JH, Edwards GA: Comparison of the effects of morphine administered by constant-rate intravenous infusion or intermittent intramuscular injection in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001, 218 (6): 884-891. 10.2460/javma.2001.218.884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Clark L, Clutton RE, Blissitt KJ, Chase-Topping ME: Effects of peri-operative morphine administration during halothane anaesthesia in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2005, 32 (1): 10-15. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2004.00174.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Clark L, Clutton RE, Blissitt KJ, Chase-Topping ME: The effects of morphine on the recovery of horses from halothane anaesthesia. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008, 35 (1): 22-29. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2007.00393.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sellon DC, Roberts MC, Blikslager AT, Ulibarri C, Papich MG: Effects of continuous rate intravenous infusion of butorphanol on physiologic and outcome variables in horses after celiotomy. J Vet Intern Med. 2004, 18 (4): 555-563. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2004.tb02585.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Dicht S, Vullo C, Frotzler A, Kuemmerle JM, Ringer SK: A clinical study on the effect in horses during medetomidine-isoflurane anaesthesia, of butorphanol constant rate infusion on isoflurane requirements, on cardiopulmonary function and on recovery characteristics. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011, 38 (3): 186-194. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00600.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Villalba M, Santiago I, Gomez de Segura IA: Effects of constant rate infusion of lidocaine and ketamine, with or without morphine, on isoflurane MAC in horses. Equine Vet J. 2011, 43 (6): 721-726. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00355.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gozalo-Marcilla M, Steblaj B, Schauvliege S, Duchateau L, Gasthuys F: Comparison of the influence of two different constant-rate infusions (dexmedetomidine versus morphine) on anaesthetic requirements, cardiopulmonary function and recovery quality in isoflurane anaesthetized horses. Res Vet Sci. 2013, 95 (3): 1186-1194. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.09.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Freitas GC, Carregaro AB, Gehrcke MI, De La Corte FD, Lara VM, Pozzobon R, Brass KE: Epidural analgesia with morphine or buprenorphine in ponies with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced carpal synovitis. Can J Vet Res. 2011, 75 (2): 141-146.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hubbell JA: Monitoring. In Equine Anesthesia: Monitoring and Emergency Therapy. 1st edition. Edited by Muir WW, Hubbell JA. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1991:515

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Swanson TD: Guide for Veterinary Service and Judging of Equestrian Events. 3rd edition. Golden: American Association of Equine Practitioners; 1984

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC: Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (3): e92281-10.1371/journal.pone.0092281.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Toombs JD, Kral LA: Methadone treatment for pain states. Am Fam Physician. 2005, 71 (7): 1353-1358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Solano AM, Valverde A, Desrochers A, Nykamp S, Boure LP: Behavioural and cardiorespiratory effects of a constant rate infusion of medetomidine and morphine for sedation during standing laparoscopy in horses. Equine Vet J. 2009, 41 (2): 153-159. 10.2746/042516408X342984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mircica E, Clutton RE, Kyles KW, Blissitt KJ: Problems associated with perioperative morphine in horses: a retrospective case analysis. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2003, 30 (3): 147-155. 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00092.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Valverde A, Gunkel CI: Pain management in horses and farm animals. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2005, 15 (4): 295-307. 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2005.00168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ringer SK, Portier KG, Fourel I, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R: Development of a romifidine constant rate infusion with or without butorphanol for standing sedation of horses. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012, 39 (1): 12-20. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00681.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Grond S, Sablotzki A: Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004, 43 (13): 879-923. 10.2165/00003088-200443130-00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Linardi RL, Stokes AM, Keowen ML, Barker SA, Hosgood GL, Short CR: Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral and injectable formulations of methadone after intravenous, oral, and intragastric administration in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2012, 73 (2): 290-295. 10.2460/ajvr.73.2.290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Steffey EP, Eisele JH, Baggot JD: Interactions of morphine and isoflurane in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2003, 64 (2): 166-175. 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vinuela-Fernandez I, Jones E, Chase-Topping ME, Price J: Comparison of subjective scoring systems used to evaluate equine laminitis. Vet J. 2011, 188 (2): 171-177. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guedes AG, Matthews NS, Hood DM: Effect of ketamine hydrochloride on the analgesic effects of tramadol hydrochloride in horses with signs of chronic laminitis-associated pain. Am J Vet Res. 2012, 73 (5): 610-619. 10.2460/ajvr.73.5.610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stewart AJ, Boothe DM, Cruz-Espindola C, Mitchum EJ, Springfield J: Pharmacokinetics of tramadol and metabolites O-desmethyltramadol and N-desmethyltramadol in adult horses. Am J Vet Res. 2011, 72 (7): 967-974. 10.2460/ajvr.72.7.967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Giorgi M, Soldani G, Manera C, Ferrarini P, Sgorbini M, Saccomanni G: Pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its metabolites M1, M2 and M5 in horses following intravenous, immediate release (Fasted/Fed) and sustained release single dose administration. J Equine Vet Sci. 2007, 27 (11): 481-488. 10.1016/j.jevs.2007.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    De Leo M, Giorgi M, Saccomanni G, Manera C, Braca A: Evaluation of tramadol and its main metabolites in horse plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography/fluorescence and liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry techniques. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23 (2): 228-236. 10.1002/rcm.3870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Knych HK, Corado CR, McKemie DS, Scholtz E, Sams R: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tramadol in horses following oral administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2013, 36 (4): 389-398. 10.1111/jvp.12009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Guedes AG, Knych HK, Soares JH, Brosnan RJ: Pharmacokinetics and physiological effects of repeated oral administrations of tramadol in horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2014, 37 (3): 269-278. 10.1111/jvp.12086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cruz FS, Carregaro AB, Machado M, Antonow RR: Sedative and cardiopulmonary effects of buprenorphine and xylazine in horses. Can J Vet Res. 2011, 75 (1): 35-41.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dhanjal JK, Wilson DV, Robinson E, Tobin TT, Dirikolu L: Intravenous tramadol: effects, nociceptive properties, and pharmacokinetics in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009, 36 (6): 581-590. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00492.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Seo JP, Son WG, Gang S, Lee I: Sedative and analgesic effects of intravenous xylazine and tramadol on horses. J Vet Sci. 2011, 12 (3): 281-286. 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.3.281.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Silva-Júnior JR: Efeitos do uso do tramadol isolado ou associado à xilazina em equinos. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal: 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fessler JF, Bottoms GD, Coppoc GL, Gimarc S, Latshaw HS, Noble JK: Plasma endotoxin concentrations in experimental and clinical equine subjects. Equine Vet J Suppl. 1989, 7: 24-28. 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb05650.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    He L, Kim J, Ou C, McFadden W, van Rijn RM, Whistler JL: Methadone antinociception is dependent on peripheral opioid receptors. J Pain. 2009, 10 (4): 369-379. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.011.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was performed with financial support provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grant number 2012/06296-6.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, Duque de Caxias Norte ave 225, Pirassununga, SP, ZIP 13635-900, Brazil

    Adriano B Carregaro, Martina H Ribeiro, Nathalia V Xavier & Renata GS Dória

  2. College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of South Border, Realeza, PR, Brazil

    Gabrielle C Freitas

Authors
  1. Adriano B Carregaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabrielle C Freitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina H Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nathalia V Xavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Renata GS Dória
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano B Carregaro.

Additional information

Competing interests

None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could have inappropriately influenced or biased the content of the paper. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ABC participated in the design of the study, supervised the experiments, performed the statistical analysis, and revised and submitted the final manuscript. GCF participated in the study from the early phase up to the end of data collection and prepared the final draft of the manuscript. MHR and NVX participated in the study from the early phase up to the end of data collection. RGSD analysed the videos and scored horse lameness. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carregaro, A.B., Freitas, G.C., Ribeiro, M.H. et al. Physiological and analgesic effects of continuous-rate infusion of morphine, butorphanol, tramadol or methadone in horses with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced carpal synovitis. BMC Vet Res 10, 966 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0299-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Opioids
  • Analgesia
  • Inflammatory pain

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us