Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy dairy cows in Algeria: antibiotic resistance, enterotoxin genes and biofilm formation

BMC Veterinary Research volume 20, Article number: 247 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus can colonize and infect a variety of animal species. In dairy herds, it is one of the leading causes of mastitis cases. The objective of this study was to characterize the S. aureus isolates recovered from nasal swabs of 249 healthy cows and 21 breeders of 21 dairy farms located in two provinces of Algeria (Tizi Ouzou and Bouira).

Methods

The detection of enterotoxin genes was investigated by multiplex PCRs. Resistance of recovered isolates to 8 antimicrobial agents was determined by disc-diffusion method. The slime production and biofilm formation of S. aureus isolates were assessed using congo-red agar (CRA) and microtiter-plate assay. Molecular characterization of selected isolates was carried out by spa-typing and Multi-Locus-Sequence-Typing (MLST).

Results

S. aureus was detected in 30/249 (12%) and 6/13 (28.6%) of nasal swabs in cows and breeders, respectively, and a total of 72 isolates were recovered from positive samples (59 isolates from cows and 13 from breeders). Twenty-six of these isolates (36.1%) harbored genes encoding for staphylococcal enterotoxins, including 17/59 (28.8%) isolates from cows and 9/13 (69.2%) from breeders. Moreover, 49.1% and 92.3% of isolates from cows and breeders, respectively, showed penicillin resistance. All isolates were considered as methicillin-susceptible (MSSA). Forty-five (76.3%) of the isolates from cows were slime producers and 52 (88.1%) of them had the ability to form biofilm in microtiter plates. Evidence of a possible zoonotic transmission was observed in two farms, since S. aureus isolates recovered in these farms from cows and breeders belonged to the same clonal lineage (CC15-ST15-t084 or CC30-ST34-t2228).

Conclusions

Although healthy cows in this study did not harbor methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, the nares of healthy cows could be a reservoir of enterotoxigenic and biofilm producing isolates which could have implications in human and animal health.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant opportunistic pathogen responsible for severe infections in both humans as well as in livestock species that are economically important [1]. In humans, it can cause a wide range of infections, ranging in severity from superficial skin and soft tissue infections to life-threating endocarditis, bacteriemia, toxic-shock syndrome, and necrotizing pneumonia, among others [2]. In animals, it can cause a large array of diseases with substantial economic impacts in livestock animals, including mastitis in dairy cows and ruminants, joint infections in poultry and surgical site infections in equine, among others [3]. Interestingly, as a commensal bacterium, S. aureus can colonize its hosts without causing any health issues [4]. It has been reported to colonize 30% of the nares of humans and it can also colonize practically all domesticated farm animals, including pigs, cattle, and poultry, as well as companion animals, such as cats, dogs, and horses. Additionally, it has also been found in wild animals [5].

The development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria has begun to pose a challenge both for clinicians and researchers [6]. The emergence of AMR was associated to the use of antimicrobial agents in humans and animals for therapeutic or prophylactic purposes as well as for animal growth promotion, although the latter is now banned in many countries, but still allowed in others [7]. Numerous zoonotic organisms that are frequently resistant to antibiotics and common causes of foodborne illness are highly prevalent in farm animals, including S. aureus [8]. S. aureus has the ability to acquire resistance to different types of antibiotics. For example, methicillin-resistance is acquired through the mecA gene (or very unfrequently the mecC gene), present in a mobile genetic element called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). The mec gene encodes a modified penicillin-binding protein, PBP2a (or PBP2’), which has a low affinity for most β-lactam antibiotics [9]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (MRSA) are a significant global cause of infections in both hospital and community settings [1]. The hospital-associated-MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains generally exhibit resistance to numerous antimicrobial agents and carry larger SCCmec elements (types I, II and III), whereas community-associated-MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains typically harbor smaller SCCmec elements (usually types IV and V) and are generally more susceptible to non-beta-lactam agents [9]. However, the expression of virulence factors, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), appears to be more frequent among CA-MRSA strains [10]. The increasing reports of community infections and the emergence of new virulent clones underscore the crucial importance of identifying potential reservoirs for newly emergent strains in humans to better understand the transmission routes of MRSA strains [1].

As reported, livestock serve as reservoirs for MRSA strains (LA-MRSA), which can be transmitted to humans in close contact with colonized animals [3]. Numerous reports document LA-MRSA transmission from animals to humans, especially those living and working in close proximity with farm animals [11, 12], like farmers and their family members, veterinarians and veterinary students who frequently exposed to sick and healthy animals harboring animal-associated staphylococci [13]. There are some factors influencing LA-MRSA spread, including the frequency of MRSA-carrying animals on the farm and the intensity/duration of animal contact [4]. Furthermore, the age of animals is regarded as a risk factor, with younger pigs more likely colonized with MRSA [14]. Beyond direct human-to-human transmission, MRSA can also disseminate through the food production chain via contaminated animal derived foods like milk and meat. Therefore, handling or consumption of foods of animal origin contaminated with MRSA poses another potential transmission route [13, 15].

In Algeria, a pandemic clone CA-MRSA ST80 PVL-positive has been disseminated in both community and healthcare settings [16,17,18]. Additionally, other MRSA lineages, such as MRSA-ST8 [19], MRSA-ST5 [20] and MRSA-ST80 [21] have also been isolated from food products. However, there is limited data available on the prevalence and pheno-genotypic characteristics of MSSA and MRSA strains of animal origin. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of S. aureus in the nasal cavity of healthy cows and breeders (farm owners) and to characterize the obtained isolates phenotypically and genotypically.

Methods

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by an internal ethics committee of the University Mouloud Mammeri of Tizi Ouzou, Algeria (UMMTO/09/01/2019/Eth-Ani-A102), according to the guidelines of the declaration of the Helsinki. All samples collected from animals and humans were collected under the written informed consent of farm owners and every farmer was provided with a document explaining the purpose and method of sample collection.

Sample collection

Between February 2019 and May 2020, a total of 270 nasal samples were obtained, including 249 swabs from cows and 21 from breeders (one sample of breeder from each farm) collected in 21 dairy farms located at different regions of two provinces of Algeria: Tizi Ouzou (Tigzirt, Ouaguenoun, Azazga, and Tizi Ouzou) and Bouira (Sor El Ghozlane) (Fig. 1). The choice of these two provinces was based on the concentration of dairy farms. The farms included in this study were small family farms (maximum of three to fifteen cows per farm) and included Holstein and Montbeliarde cows. The age of the cows ranged from 3 to 10 years with an average of 7 years. The farms were managed by family farmers who breed and take care of their animals. In each farm, we have selected randomly the cows based only on their health state and their treatment with antibiotics. All cows and breeders were considered healthy since at the time of sampling, none presented clinical symptoms of infection and none was treated with antibiotics. Nasal swabs were collected from cows and farm owners on cow farms in which it was obtained the consent for participation. The nasal samples were taken by swabbing both nares of each cow or breeder (one sample per cow or breeder) with a sterile cotton swab (after proper cleaning and disinfection of the external nares with cotton soaked with 70% ethyl alcohol), which was introduced into each nostril (distance of 5 to 10 cm in cows and 2 to 3 cm in breeders to reach the ventral meatus) to collect the nasal mucus. After sampling, the nasal swab was stored in Mueller Hinton broth supplemented with 6.5% NaCl. Samples were placed in cooled containers and immediately transported to the laboratory. All samples were analyzed within 24 h of arrival.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographic distribution of the 21 cow farms located at Tizi Ouzou and Bouira provinces of Algeria in which the nasal samples were taken to be analyzed in this study

Full size image

Microbiological identification of S. aureus isolates

The swab samples were enriched in 5 ml of Mueller-Hinton broth (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) containing 6.5% NaCl (v/v) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After incubation, an aliquot of the broth (0.1 ml) was spread on Baird Parker agar (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) supplemented with 5% egg yolk and tellurite (Conda Pronadisa, Spain), and plates were incubated for 24 h to 48 h at 37 °C. Suspected S. aureus colonies were selected based on their morphology and color (one to five S. aureus colonies were selected from each positive sample), and subcultured onto brain heart infusion agar (BHIA) (Biokar, France). The obtained isolates were identified as S. aureus using conventional methods including Gram stain reaction, catalase, coagulase (Biokar, France) and DNase tests. The reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25,923 was used as positive control to validate the results of all microbiological tests. Phenotypically identified S. aureus isolates were stored in brain heart infusion broth (BHIB) (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) with 30% glycerol (v/v) at -20 °C for further characterization [19].

Molecular characterization of S. aureus isolates

DNA extraction

The overnight culture of S. aureus isolates were submitted to DNA extraction using the InstaGene Kit (Bio Rad, France), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA concentrations were quantified using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) [20].

Identification of S. aureus isolates by PCR amplification of 23 S rRNA gene

The identification of S. aureus isolates was carried out using the protocol described by Straub et al. [22]. The resulting PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide (1 µg ml− 1) using the Gel Doc EQ apparatus (Bio-Rad, France). A 1-kb DNA ladder (Promega, Lyon, France) was served as a molecular weight standard. The reference strain S. aureus FRI 361 was used as positive control [20].

Detection of enterotoxin genes by multiplex-PCR

All S. aureus isolates were tested for the presence of 11 staphylococcal enterotoxin genes using the method described by Roussel et al. [23] and validated by the European reference laboratory for coagulase positive staphylococci (EURL CPS). This involved performing two multiplex PCR reactions. The first PCR detected six “classical” enterotoxin genes (sea, seb, sec, sed, see and ser), and the second PCR detected five newly identified enterotoxin genes (seg, seh, sei, sej and sep). After PCR amplification, the PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (2% agarose) and the bands were visualized using the Gel Doc EQ apparatus (Bio-Rad). Five reference S. aureus strains (i.e. FRIS6, 374 F, FRI137, FRI326 and FRI361) served as positive controls, as described previously [20].

Molecular typing of selected isolates

Selected S. aureus isolates which shared the same pheno-genotypic characteristics (antimicrobial resistance and enterotoxin gene profiles) and were recovered in both cows and breeders were typed by sequencing the repeat region of the Staphylococcus protein A gene (spa) obtained by PCR [24]. The obtained sequences were analyzed by Ridom Staph-Type software, by detection and assignment of spa repeats (http://spaserver.ridom.de/). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was also performed in these selected S. aureus isolates. The seven house-keeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi and yqiL) of the S. aureus isolates were amplified as previously described [25], and sequence type (ST) was assigned from sequence analyses on the MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/). The clonal complex (CC) of the isolates was assigned according to their spa types (when it was possible), or to their sequence types (ST).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI [26]. Eight antimicrobial agents were tested (µg/disk): penicillin G (10 UI), cefoxitin (30), gentamicin (10), tetracycline (30), erythromycin (15), ofloxacin (15), chloramphenicol (30) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75). The reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25,923 was used as control strain in susceptibility testing. After incubation, the inhibition diameters were measured and the strains were categorized as susceptible, intermediate or resistant according to breakpoints of the CLSI [26].

Detection of biofilm production

Congo red agar method (CRA)

To assess the slime production of S. aureus isolates, the Congo Red Agar method (CRA) described by Freeman et al. [27] was used. In this protocol, a single colony from each S. aureus isolate was streaked on CRA plates and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. After incubation, isolates that formed black colonies were identified as slime producers, while the non-biofilm producer strains developed red colonies on the CRA plates.

Microtiter plate assay (MPA)

The biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus isolates was evaluated using a quantitative microtiter plate assay (MPA) as described by Stepanović et al. [28], with some modifications. Initially, S. aureus isolates were grown in BHIA (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) at 37 °C for 24 h under aerobic conditions. The next day, two colonies were inoculated into 5 ml of trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) supplemented with 1% of Glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, Isère, France) and incubated overnight at 37 °C without shaking. After incubation, the cultures were diluted 1:50 in TSB-1% glucose, and 200 µl of each diluted culture were transferred into three wells of a 96-well, flat-bottomed, tissue culture-treated plate (ProLab Scientific Co Ltd, Zhejiang, China). The reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as positive control and the medium TSB-1% glucose served as a negative control. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the non-adhered cells were removed from the wells by gently overturning the plate onto paper towels, and the wells were gently washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and allowed to dry. The adherent bacterial cells were fixed with 150 µL of methanol (Honeywell, Seelze, Germany) for 15 min, and the biofilm formed was stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Biochem Chemopharma, Nièvre, France) for 15 min. After washing, the dye bound to the cells was eluted with 95% ethanol, and the biofilm formation was measured at 560 nm using microtiter-plate reader (Gentaur, Paris, France). The biofilm formation was expressed as optical density (OD) values. Each S. aureus isolate was studied in triplicate in a single experiment. The average OD value of all tested strains (ODs) and negative controls was calculated. Cut-off OD (ODc) is defined as three standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control. The isolates were classified into four following categories based on the optical density: non-biofilm producer (OD test < ODc), weak biofilm producer (ODc < OD < 2X ODc), moderate biofilm producer (2X ODc < OD < 4X ODc), and strong biofilm producer (4X ODc < OD).

Results

A total of 249 healthy cows and 21 breeders from 21 dairy herds located in two provinces of Algeria (Tizi Ouzou and Bouira) were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage. Overall, 12% of the screened cows and 28.6% of the breeders were colonized with S. aureus (Table 1). A total of 59 and 13 isolates were recovered from cows and breeders (one or two isolates per positive sample), respectively. In all, 26 of these isolates (36.1%) harbored one or more genes encoding for staphylococcal enterotoxins, including 17 (28.8%) isolates from cows and 9 (69.2%) isolates from breeders. In total, ten and four enterotoxin gene profiles were observed in S. aureus isolates from cows and breeders, respectively. The most detected gene was seb (8.5%) in cow isolates. However, seg and sei genes were the most commonly found in breeder isolates. Other enterotoxin gene profiles were identified with lower frequencies (Table 2). None of the isolates contained the see and sep genes.

Table 1 Number and distribution of cows and breeders nasal samples carrying S. aureus isolates in different regions of two provinces of Algeria (Tizi Ouzou and Bouira)
Full size table
Table 2 Distribution of enterotoxin genes among the 72 S. aureus isolates recovered from cow and breeder samples
Full size table

After antibiotic susceptibility testing, it was found that 44 (61.1%) of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent. However, only three isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR), and exhibited resistance to penicillin, tetracycline and ofloxacin. Among them, one isolate was recovered from a cow and the other two from breeders. The highest resistance rate was found for penicillin in isolates from cows and breeders, with values of 49.1% and 92.3%, respectively, followed by tetracycline (30.5% and 23.1%, respectively). Resistance to erythromycin, gentamicin and ofloxacin was not so commonly observed (≤ 15%). All isolates were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and chloramphenicol (Table 3). All S. aureus isolates were cefoxitin-susceptible and were considered as methicillin-susceptible (MSSA).

Table 3 Antibiotic resistance of the 72 S. aureus isolates from cows (n = 59) and breeders (n = 13)
Full size table

A possible transmission of S. aureus between breeders and cows was shown in two farms (number 4 and 18). In farm 4, the same clonal lineage ST15-t084 was found in S. aureus isolates from one cow and one breeder, and both isolates shared the same antimicrobial resistance phenotype. Similarly, in farm 18 another clonal lineage (ST34-t228) was found in isolates of the cow and the breeder, and the isolates shared also identical enterotoxin gene profile and resistance phenotype (Table 4).

Table 4 Pheno-genotypic characteristics of S. aureus isolates recovered from cows and breeders of two farms
Full size table

Biofilm formation ability of tested isolates from cows and breeders was phenotypically assessed by the CRA method. In total, 45 (76.3%) and 10 (76.9%) of the S. aureus isolates from cows and breeders were found to be slime-producers (Table 5). In MPA, it was observed that most of them showed the ability to produce biofilm, including 52 (88.1%) and 11 (84.6%) isolates from cows and breeders respectively. In cows, 23 (38.9%) isolates showed strong biofilm formation, 12 (20.3%) isolates showed moderate biofilm formation, and 17 (28.8%) isolates showed weak biofilm formation. The remaining isolates (11.9%) lacked the capacity to form biofilm (Table 5). In breeders, 4 (30.8%) of the isolates showed strong biofilm formation, 4 (30.8%) isolates showed moderate biofilm formation, and 3 (23.1%) isolates showed weak biofilm formation. The remaining isolates (15.4%) lacked the capacity to form biofilm (Table 5).

Table 5 Distribution of slime and biofilm producing S. aureus isolates recovered from nasal swabs of healthy cows (n = 59) and breeders (n = 13)
Full size table

Discussion

Studies on the transmission dynamic of livestock-associated MRSA between different host species have been limited, despite it being a major global concern [29]. However, reports of MRSA infection and colonization have been reported in a range of animal species, including farm and domestic animals [30]. This study aimed to investigate the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of S. aureus isolates recovered from nasal swabs of healthy cows and breeders in two provinces of Algeria.

A low rate of nasal carriage of S. aureus in healthy cows was detected in our study (12%). This result corroborates the findings of previous studies conducted in Algeria [31], Egypt [32], Portugal [33], Morocco [34], Turkey [35], Tunisia [36] and Iran [37], with values of 15%, 4.3%, 13.1%, 9.9%, 3.2%, 1.3% and 5.1%, respectively. In Algeria, Bounar-Kechih et al. [38] also reported a high prevalence rate of S. aureus in bovine (55%). In the present study, 28.6% of breeders were found colonized by S. aureus, which agree with the results of Kalayu et al. [39] in Ethiopia and Silva et al. [33] in Portugal. However, a higher rate of S. aureus was reported by Mourabit et al. [34] in Morocco, with a value of 60%. Various factors might explain the difference in the isolation frequency of S. aureus through the conducted studies, including livestock density, isolation methods, husbandry practices and geographical conditions [30].

Some isolates from cows (28.8%) in this study carried the genes encoding for staphylococcal enterotoxins, that is in agreement with the results obtained by other authors who have shown the presence of enterotoxin genes in S. aureus isolates of animal origin [40,41,42]. However, the prevalence of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes was higher in isolates obtained from breeders than in those isolated from cows. Similarly, El-Ashker et al. [42] have reported a toxinogenic S. aureus harboring the luk-S/F-PV, tst and the staphylococcal enterotoxin genes among the S. aureus isolates of human origin. The existence of enterotoxin genes in isolates from healthy cows and breeders may pose a public health hazard to consumers, since these staphylococci can contaminate raw milk during improper milking practices and potentially lead to foodborne illnesses.

In this study, the S. aureus isolates from healthy cows and breeders were resistant to tetracycline and penicillin with higher rates in relation to other antibiotics, which may be a consequence of the wide use of these antimicrobial agents not only in human medicine but also in veterinary medicine [43]. Our results corroborate those of many authors, who found a high frequency of resistance of S. aureus isolates to penicillin and/or tetracycline [31, 32, 38, 41, 44]. The use of antibiotics across various domains, including human and veterinary healthcare, agriculture, and other areas, can exert selective pressure that favors the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms [45]. Only small numbers of isolates were resistant to erythromycin, gentamicin and ofloxacin, both for isolates of animal and human origin. The values obtained do not agree with those of Bounar-Kechih et al. [38], who found high resistance rates to enrofloxacin and erythromycin. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. None of the S. aureus isolates of this study were MRSA. Our results agree with those of Khemiri et al. [41] and Mourabit et al. [34]. However, many authors have reported the presence of MRSA among S. aureus isolates from nasal swabs in cows [35, 38, 44, 46].

Healthy cattle can harbor bacterial strains potentially transmissible to humans, especially those in close contact with farm animals such as farm workers, veterinarians, and abattoir workers [43]. S. aureus may spread from cattle to farm workers through direct contact or indirect exposure within the farm environment [12]. In our study evidence of possible zoonotic transmission of S. aureus between cows and breeders was observed in two farms. In farm 4, one cow was colonized by S. aureus ST15/t084 (CC15) and one breeder was also colonized by the same clone. In addition, in farm 18, one cow was colonized by a MSSA of clonal lineage ST34/t2228 (CC30) carrying the seg, seh, sei genes and one breeder was colonized by the same clone harboring the same enterotoxin genes. As known, the lineage ST15, mainly associated to human MSSA isolates, is highly prevalent in African countries, according to the findings of healthcare institutions [47, 48]. However, this lineage has also been reported in cattle [31, 49] and wildlife animals [50]. In a study conducted by Aanensen et al. [51], six major CC were observed among MSSA lineages in Europe, including CC5, CC22, CC8, CC30, CC45 and CC15, with CC5 the most observed. However, Tavares et al. [52] reported that the CC30 was the most common clonal complex found in Portuguese MSSA isolates.

Biofilm formation is considered as a way for microorganisms to adapt to their environment, involving physiological changes from that observed in the planktonic mode of growth [53]. It represents an important virulence factor, enabling microbial survival in food production facilities and persistent colonization of biomaterials used in implanted medical devices [54]. This also applies to S. aureus, which has the ability to produce biofilms, as part of its normal life cycle [55]. As known, the persistence of staphylococci in food processing environments is linked to their ability to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces [56]. However, little published works were available concerning the biofilm formation ability of S. aureus isolates of animal origin, and the majority of existing studies in this area have focused specifically on S. aureus strains associated with bovine mastitis [57]. In this study we have used two techniques to evaluate the capacity of recovered S. aureus isolates to produce biofilms in vitro; among these isolates, 45 (76.3%) from cows and 10 (76.9%) from breeders were biofilm producers by CRA plate method. Our results agree with those of Achek et al. [58] and Ballah et al. [59], who reported that 70.9% and 89%, respectively, of S. aureus isolates derived from different origins, including animals, food and humans, were biofilm producers. A similar result was obtained by Vasileiou et al. [60] in S. aureus isolates from subclinical mastitis in sheep, with value of 69.1%. Although the CRA test is not considered the most sensitive for assessing biofilm formation, this simple qualitative phenotypic test was used for its acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity [58, 61]. Nonetheless, it is important to note that the production of slime by Staphylococcus species can be influenced by various factors, including the presence of glucose and sodium chloride [62]. The MPA test revealed that most of the isolates (88.1%) showed the ability to produce biofilms. Silva et al. [57], found that all S. aureus isolates recovered from different animal species, including pets, livestock and wild animals, produced biofilm; however, isolates from pigs and cows were the least biofilm producers among all tested animals, which does not agree with our findings. Studies conducted with S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis showed that most isolates were biofilm producers [63, 64]. In food industry, biofilm formation is highly undesirable for sanitary and safety reasons due to the possible adherence of food spoilage or pathogenic microorganisms to food or food surfaces, making their removal more difficult and raising the possibility of cross contamination [65]. Additionally, biofilms offer an environment with a high cell density and a greater innate ability for the exchange of mobile genetic elements, which are involved in the transfer of antibiotic resistance [66]. For this, biofilm formation by Staphylococcus spp. confers an evolutionary advantage to these microorganisms, as it enhances their resistance to harsh environmental conditions, such as exposure to antimicrobial agents, sanitizers, and desiccation [67].

There are various limitations to our study. Firstly, the nasal carriage of S. aureus in cows and breeders could be transient, making it difficult to detect at the time of sampling. Another limitation on our study is the small sample size, which likely had an impact on the quality of results. Further extensive research encompassing a greater number of cow farms collected at different geographical locations might provide additional insights into the nasal carriage of S. aureus in dairy cows. Furthermore, we have screened only staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in all recovered S. aureus isolates. However, the isolated S. aureus strains could harbor additional virulence factors which are implicated in broad range of clinical infections in both animals and humans.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated a low prevalence of S. aureus in the nares of healthy cows, and the absence of MRSA among them. However, most isolated strains were biofilm producers and some of them harbored enterotoxin genes that could have public health implications. Our findings highlight the importance of surveillance studies among healthy animals to gain knowledge in the genetic lineages of S. aureus that may constitute a zoonotic risk for a better understanding of S. aureus transmission routes and for implementing adequate control measures.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fitzgerald JR. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:192–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(8):520–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graveland H, Duim B, van Duijkeren E, Heederik D, Wagenaar JA. Livestock-associated methicillin Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301:630–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crespo-Piazuelo D, Lawlor PG. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) prevalence in humans in close contact with animals and measures to reduce on-farm colonization. Ir Vet J. 2021;74:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuny C, Kӧck R, Witte W. Livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) and its relevance for humans in Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruiz L, Alvarez-Ordóňez A. The role of the food chain in the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In Functionalized Nannomaterials for the Management of Microbial Infection: A strategy to Address Microbial Drug Resistance., Boukheroub S, Szunerits S, Drider. D. (2017) pp 23–47. Ed Elsevier.

  7. WHOA. Annual Report on Antimicrobial Agents Intended for Use in Animals. 6th edition. World Organization for Animal Health. 2022. pp 1-132.

  8. Gebreyes WA, Wittum T, Habing G, Alali W, Usui M, Suzuki S, Aldsworth et al. (2017) 105–30. Ed Elesevier.

  9. Uehara Y. Current status of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). Antibiotics. 2022;11(1):86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ceballos S, Aspiroz C, Ruiz-Ripa L, Azcona-Gutierrez JM, López-Cerero, López-Calleja AI, Álvarez L, Gomáriz M, Fernández M, Torres C. Study Group of Clinical LA-MRSA, Multicenter study of clinical non-β-lactam-antibiotic susceptible MRSA strains: genetic lineages and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) production. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019;37(8):509–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carfora V, Giacinti G, Sagrafoli, Marri N, Giangolini G, Alba P, Feltrin F, Sorbara L, Amoruso R, Caprioli A, Amatiste S, Battisti A. Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in dairy sheep and in-contact humans: an intra-farm study. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:4251–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Locatelli C, Cremonesi P, Caprioli A, Carfora V, Lanzano A, Barberio A, Morandi S, Casula A, Castiglioni B, Bronzo V, Moronill P. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dairy cattle herds, related swine farms, and humans in contact with herds. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(1):608–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdullahi IN, Lozano C, Ruiz-Ripa L, Fernández-Fernández R, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Ecology and genetic lineages of nasal Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA carriage in healthy persons with or without animal-related occupational risks of colonization: a review of global reports. Pathogens. 2022;10(8):1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. George AN, Stewart JR, Evans JC, Gibson JMD. Risk of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus dispersion from hog farms: a critical review. Risk Anal. 2020;40:1645–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuny C, Wieler LH, Witte W, Livestock-Associated MRSA. The impact on humans. Antibiot (Basel). 2015;4(4):521–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Antri K, Rouzic N, Dauwalder O, Boubekri I, Bes M, Lina G, Vandenesch F, Tazir M, Ramdani-Bouguessa N, Etienne J. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST80-IV in hospital and community settings in Algiers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(4):526–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alioua A, Labid A, Amoura K, Bertine M, Gacemi-Kirane D, Dekhil M. Emergence of the European ST80 clone of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of healthcare-associated infections in Eastern Algeria. Med Mal Infect. 2014;44(4):180–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mairi A, Touati A, Lavigne JP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST80 clone: a systematic review. Toxins. 2020;12:119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Titouche Y, Hakem A, Houali K, Meheut T, Vingadassalon N, Ruiz-Ripa L, Salmi D, Chergui A, Chenouf N, Hennekinne JA, Torres C, Auvray F. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST8 in raw milk and traditional dairy products in the Tizi Ouzou area of Algeria. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:6876–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Titouche Y, Houali K, Ruiz-Ripa L, Vingadassalon N, Nia Y, Fatihi A, Cauquil A, Bouchez P, Bouhier L, Torres C, Hennekinne JA. Enterotoxin genes and antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food products in Algeria. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;129(4):1043–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chenouf NS, Mama OM, Messai CR, Ruiz-Ripa L, Fernández-Fernández R, Carvalho I, Zitouni A, Hakem A, Torres C. Detection of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and PVL/mecA genes in cefoxitin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (t044/ST80) from unpasteurized milk sold in stores in Djelfa, Algeria. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(3):2684–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Straub JA, Hertel C, Hammes WP. A 23S rDNA-targeted polymerase chain reaction-based system for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in meat starter culture and dairy products. J Food Prot. 1999;62:1150–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roussel S, Felix B, Vingadassalon N, Grout J, Hennekinne JA, Guillier L, Brisabois A, Auvray F. Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning outbreaks in France: comparison of different molecular typing methods, including MLVA. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdullahi IN, Lozano C, Simon C, Latorre-Fernandez J, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Nasal staphylococci community of healthy pigs and pig-farmers in Aragon (Spain). Predominance and within-host resistome diversity in MRSA-CC398 and MSSA-CC9 lineages. One Health. 2023;16:100505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lozano C, Porres-Osante N, Crettaz J, Rojo-Bezares B, Benito D, Olarte I, Zarazaga M, Sáenz Y, Torres C. Changes in genetic lineages, resistance, and virulence in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Spanish hospitals. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19:233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. CLSI. (2020). Document M100-S30. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

  27. Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Keane CT. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42(8):872–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukić S, Cirković I, Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overeview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production. APMIS. 2007;115(8):891–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Avberšek J, Golob M, Papić B, Dermota U, Košnik IG, Kušar D, Ocepek M, Zdovc I. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: establishing links between animals and humans on livestock holdings. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68(2):789–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdullahi IN, Lozano C, Saidenberg ABS, Latorre-Fernández J, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Comparative review of the nasal carriage and genetic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy livestock: insight into zoonotic and anthroponotic clones. Infect Genet Evol. 2023;109:105408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Agabou A, Ouchenane Z, Essebe CN, Khemissi S, Chehboub MTE, Chehboub IB, Sotto A, Dunyach-Remy C, Lavigne JP. Emergence of nasal carriage of ST80 and ST152 PVL + Staphylococcus aureus isolates from livestock in Algeria. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9(10):303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdel-Moein KA, Zaher HM. Occurrence of multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among healthy farm animals: a public health concern. Int J Vet Sci Med. 2019;7(1):55–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Silva V, Correira S, Rocha J, Manaia CM, Silva A, García-Díez J, Pereira JE, Semedo-Lemsaddek T, Igrejas G, Poeta P. Antimicrobial resistance and clonal lineages of Staphylococcus aureus from cattle, their handlers, and their surroundings: a cross-sectional study from one health perspective. Microorganisms. 2022;10:941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mourabit N, Arakrak A, Bakkali M, Zian Z, Bakkach J, Laglaoui A. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in farm animals and breeders in north of Morocco. BMC J Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Garipcin M, Seker E. Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and farm workers in Turkey. Veterinarski Arhiv. 2015;85(2):117–29.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Gómez-Sanz E, Lozano C, Zarazaga M, Messadi L, Boudabous A, Torres C. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from nasal samples of healthy farm animals and pets in Tunisia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015; 15(2): 109–115.

  37. Saei, H. D, Panahi M. Genotyping and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from dairy ruminants: differences in the distribution of clonal types between cattle and small ruminants. Arch Microbiol. 2020; 202(1): 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bounar-Kechih S, Hamdi MT, Aggad H, Meguenni N, Cantekin Z. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in poultry and cattle in Northern of Algeria. Vet Med Int. 2018; 4636121.

  39. Kalayu AA, Woldetsadik DA, Woldeamanuel Y, Wang SH, Gebreyes WA, Teferi T. Burden and antimicrobial resistance of S. Aureus in dairy farms in Mekelle, Northern of Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou Z, Zhang M, Li H, Yang H, Li X, Song X, Wang Z. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from goats in Chongqing, China. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Khemiri M, Abbassi MS, Couto N, Mansouri R, Hammami S, Pomba C. Genetic characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and nasal samples of healthy cows in Tunisia: first report of ST97-t267-agrI-SCCmecV MRSA of bovine origin in Tunisia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;14:161–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. El-Ashker M, Monecke S, Gwida M, Saad T, El-Gohary A, Mohamed A, Reißig A, Frankenfeld K, Gary D, Müller E, Ehricht R. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clones isolated from healthy dairy animals and their caretakers in Egypt. Vet Microbiol. 2020;267:109374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Conceição T, de Lencastre H, Aires-de-Sousa M. Healthy bovines as reservoirs of major pathogenic lineages of Staphylococcus aureus in Portugal. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(7):845–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mairi A, Touati A, Pantel A, Zenati K, Yahiaoui-Martinez A, Dunyach-Remy C, Sotto A, Lavigne JP. Distribution of toxinogenic methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from different ecological niches in Algeria. Toxins. 2019;11(9):500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. González-Candelas F, Comas I, Martínez JL, Galán JC, Baquero F. The evolution of antibiotic resistance In Genetics and evolution of infectious diseases. Tibayrenc M. 2011; pp. 305–337. Ed Elsevier.

  46. Nemeghaire S, Argudin MA, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage isolates from bovine. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Breurec S, Fall C, Pouillot R, Boisier P, Brisse S, Diene-Sarr F, Djibo S, Etienne J, Fonkoua MC, Perrier-Gros-Claude JD, Ramarokoto CE, Randrianirina F, Thiberge JM, Zriouil SB, Garin B, Laurent F. Epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus lineages in five major African towns: high prevalence of Panton–Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(4):633–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Eibach D, Nagel M, Hogan B, Azuure C, Krumkamp R, Dekker D, Gajdiss M, Brunke M, Sarpong N, Owusu-Dabo E, May J. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among children in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Thomas A, Chothe S, Byukusenge M, Mathews T, Pierre T, Kariyawasam S, Luley E, Kuchipudi S, Jayarao B. Prevalence and distribution of multilocus sequence types of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bulk tank milk and cows with mastitis in Pennsylvania. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Heaton CJ, Gerbig GR, Sensius LD, Patel V, Smith TC. Staphylococcus aureus Epidemiology in Wildlife: a systematic review. Antibiotics. 2020;9(2):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Aanensen DM, Feil EJ, Holden MTG, Dordel J, Yeats CA, Fedosejev A, Goater R, Castillo-Ramirez S, Corander J, Colijn C. Whole genome sequencing for routine pathogen surveillance in public health: a population snapshot of invasive Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. MBio. 2016;7:e00444–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Tavares A, Faria NA, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M. Population structure of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in Portugal over a 19-year period (1992–2001). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:423–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lianou A, Nychas GJE, Koutsoumanis KP. Strain variability in biofilm formation: a food safety and quality perspective. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:870–926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sivaraman GK, Muneeb KH, Sudha S, Shome B, Cole J, Holmes M. Prevalence of virulent and biofilm-forming ST88-IV-t2526 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones circulating in local retail fish markets in Assam, India. Food Control. 2021;127:108098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Møretrø T, Hermansen L, Holck AL, Sidhu MS, Rudi K, Langsrud S. Biofilm formation and the presence of the intercellular adhesion locus ica among staphylococci from food and food processing environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5648–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Silva V, Correia E, Pereira JE, González-Machado C, Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C, Igrejas G, Poeta P. Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus from pets, livestock, and wild animals: relationship with clonal lineages and antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics. 2022;11(6):772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Achek R, Hotzel H, Nabi I, Kechida S, Mami D, Didouh N, Tomaso H, Neubauer H, Ehricht R, Monecke S, El-Adawy H. Phenotypic and molecular detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different sources in Algeria. Pathogens. 2020;9:153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ballah FM, Islam MS, Rana ML, Ferdous FB, Ahmed R, Pramanik PK, Karmoker J, Ievy S, Sobur MA, Siddique MP, Khatun MM, Rahman M, Rahman MT. Phenotypic and genotypic detection of biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus from different food sources in Bangladesh. Biology (Basel). 2022;11:949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Vasileiou NGC, Chatzopoulos DC, Gougoulis DA, Sarrou S, Katsafadou AI, Spyrou V, Mavrogianni VS, Petinaki E, Fthenakis GC. Slime-producing staphylococci as causal agents of subclinical mastitis in sheep. Vet Microbiol. 2018;224:93–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jain A, Agarwal A. Biofilm production, a marker of pathogenic potential of colonizing and commensal staphylococci. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;76:88–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee JS, Bae YM, Han A, Lee SY. Development of Congo red broth method for the detection of biofilm-forming or slime-producing Staphylococcus Sp. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2016;73:707–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Felipe V, Morgante CA, Somale PS, Varroni F, Zingaretti ML, Bachetti RA, Correa SG, Porporatto C. Evaluation of the biofilm forming ability and its associated genes in Staphylococcus species isolates from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy farms. Microb Pathog. 2017;104:278–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Torres G, Vargas K, Sánchez-Jiménez M, Reyes-Velez J, Olivera-Angel M. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine intramammary infections in Colombian dairy farms. Heliyon. 2019;5(10):e02535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Landeta G, Curiel JA, Carrascosa AV, Muñoz R, de las Rivas B. Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from Spanish dry cured meat products. Meat Sci. 2013;93:387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Madsen JS, Burmølle M, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ. The interconnection between biofilm formation and horizontal gene transfer. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;65(2):183–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Castro RD, Pedroso SHSP, Sandes SHC, Silva GO, Luiz KCM, Dias RS, Filho RAT, Figueiredo HCP, Santos SG, Nunes AC, Souza MR. Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the production process of Minas artisanal cheese from the region of Campo das vertentes, Brazil. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(3):2098–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the farmers for their collaboration in this study. This work was supported by Laboratory for Food Safety, ANSES, Maisons-Alfort, France.

Funding

The experimental work performed in the University of La Rioja has been performed with project PID2022-139591OB-I00 financed by MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Analytical Biochemistry and Biotechnology (LABAB), University Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria

    Yacine Titouche, Yasmina Djaoui, Donia Mechoub & Karim Houali

  2. Laboratory of Biotechnologies Related to Animal Reproduction, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University of Saad Dahlab, Blida 1.Blida, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria

    Madjid Akkou

  3. Laboratory For Food Safety, University Paris Est, Maisons-Alfort, Paris, France, Anses, F-94700, France

    Abdelhak Fatihi, Pascal Bouchez, Laurence Bouhier, Yacine Nia & Jacques-Antoine Hennekinne

  4. Area of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain

    Allelen Campaña-Burguet & Carmen Torres

Authors
  1. Yacine Titouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madjid Akkou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasmina Djaoui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donia Mechoub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdelhak Fatihi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Allelen Campaña-Burguet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pascal Bouchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Laurence Bouhier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Karim Houali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Carmen Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yacine Nia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jacques-Antoine Hennekinne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.T and M. A: performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Y.D, D.M, P. B, and L. B: collaborated in the design of experiments. A. C-B: performed part of experiment and revised the manuscript. A.F, K. H, C. T, Y. N and J-A. H: supervised the experiments, analyzed the results and revised the different version of the manuscript. The final version of the manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yacine Titouche.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All samples collected from animals and humans were collected under the written informed consent of farm owners and every farmer was provided with a document explaining the purpose and method of sample collection. All experimental protocols of this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of University Mouloud Mammeri of Tizi Ouzou, Algeria (UMMTO/09/01/2019/Eth-Ani-A102).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Titouche, Y., Akkou, M., Djaoui, Y. et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy dairy cows in Algeria: antibiotic resistance, enterotoxin genes and biofilm formation. BMC Vet Res 20, 247 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04103-x

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us