Skip to main content
Download PDF

Detection method for reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification of avian influenza virus subtypes H5, H7, and H9

BMC Veterinary Research volume 20, Article number: 203 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Avian influenza virus (AIV) not only causes huge economic losses to the poultry industry, but also threatens human health. Reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) is a novel isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology. This study aimed to improve the detection efficiency of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV and detect the disease in time. This study established RT-RAA-LFD and real-time fluorescence RT-RAA (RF-RT-RAA) detection methods, which combined RT-RAA with lateral flow dipstick (LFD) and exo probe respectively, while primers and probes were designed based on the reaction principle of RT-RAA.

Results

The results showed that RT-RAA-LFD could specifically amplify H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV at 37 °C, 18 min, 39 °C, 20 min, and 38 °C, 18 min, respectively. The sensitivity of all three subtypes for RT-RAA-LFD was 102 copies/µL, which was 10 ∼100 times higher than that of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) agarose electrophoresis method. RF-RT-RAA could specifically amplify H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV at 40 °C, 20 min, 38 °C, 16 min, and 39 °C, 17 min, respectively. The sensitivity of all three subtypes for RF-RT-RAA was 101 copies/µL, which was consistent with the results of real-time fluorescence quantification RT-PCR, and 100 ∼1000 times higher than that of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis method. The total coincidence rate of the two methods and RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis in the detection of clinical samples was higher than 95%.

Conclusions

RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA were successfully established in this experiment, with quick response, simple operation, strong specificity, high sensitivity, good repeatability, and stability. They are suitable for the early and rapid diagnosis of Avian influenza and they have positive significance for the prevention, control of the disease, and public health safety.

Peer Review reports

Background

Avian influenza (AI), caused by avian influenza virus (AIV), is an acute, highly contagious disease, which can also infect humans [1, 2]. AIV can be divided into highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses and low pathogenic avian influenza viruses [3]. Highly pathogenic avian influenza causes high mortality in poultry, which was classified as a notifiable disease by the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) and a class I infectious disease by China [4, 5]. AIV has a wide range of hosts, not only infecting a variety of animals, for example, birds, but also jumping across species barriers to infect humans [6,7,8]. Human deaths could be caused by AIV infections, which has been reported in several influenza pandemics. There are a large number of AIV subtypes with high variability, but, no cross-immunity have been found between them, which brought frequent outbreaks of epidemics. At present, highly pathogenic strains are only found in some H5 and H7 subtypes of AIV [9]. Although the H9 subtype of AIV is a low pathogenic virus, it has a wide epidemic scope and high isolation rate. The H9 subtype is easy to recombine with other subtypes, which brings difficulties to the prevention and control work [10]. Therefore, rapid detection of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV is crucial in controlling the epidemic in the poultry industry and safeguarding human health.

There are a variety of detection methods for AIV. Although the commonly used detection method for virus isolation is relatively accurate, it is cumbersome to operate and it has high requirements for the culture conditions [11, 12]. The commonly used molecular diagnostic technology is reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), of which real-time fluorescence quantification RT-PCR (RFQ-RT-PCR) has high sensitivity. However, since RT-PCR relies on a complex thermal cycle process, it has defects such as high requirements for the professional level of instruments and operators and long detection time [13], which limits the application in rapid detection. To avoid the thermal cycling process in RT-PCR, some isothermal amplification technologies have been developed and gradually applied to nucleic acid amplification detection. Among them, the reaction temperature for nucleic acid sequence-based amplification is 42 Â°C, which can directly amplify RNA, but there are problems such as insufficient sensitivity and false positives in the detection of some viruses [14, 15]. Rolling circle amplification is an isothermal amplification technology based on the rolling circle specific replication method of circular DNA molecules in nature [16]. The reaction temperature is 37 Â°C, and SNP analysis can be performed, but the required template must be single-stranded circular DNA. If the sample does not meet the requirements, it will need annealing and cyclization treatment, and the reaction time will take longer. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification is a constant temperature nucleic acid amplification technology proposed by Notomi and his team in 2000 [17]. It can react at 60–65 °C with strong specificity and high amplification efficiency, but the primer design is more complicated, 3 ∼4 pairs of primers need to be designed for 6 ∼8 different regions [18]. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and Recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) are isothermal amplification methods that have been developed in recent years. The principle of both methods is similar, but the recombinase of RPA is usually derived from T4 phage, while the recombinase of RAA is derived from bacteria or fungi, which have a wider variety of sources [19, 20].

RecA recombinase from E. coli, single-stranded DNA binding protein, and DNA polymerase, were applied in RAA [21]. This process of in vitro DNA amplification does not require high temperature. Generally, the same target fragment can be obtained at 37 °C-42 °C for 15–30 min, which is the same as the traditional high temperature polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the detection was completed by agarose electrophoresis, lateral flow dipstick (LFD) and real-time monitoring [22, 23]. This method has been widely used in the detection of a variety of pathogens, such as Carp edema virus [24], Mycoplasma pneumoniae [25], Leishmania [26], pseudorabies virus [19], and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [27].

In this study, a pair of specific primers and probes were designed for the conserved region of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene sequence of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV. The detection method of reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) combined with LFD (RT-RAA-LFD) and real-time fluorescence RT-RAA (RF-RT-RAA) detection method combined with exo probe were established, respectively. The two detection methods with high sensitivity and strong specificity based on RT-RAA, avoid the complex thermal cycle process of RT-PCR and RFQ-RT-PCR. This study aims to provide two new methods for the detection of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV and technical support for the effective prevention and control of the disease.

Results

Optimization of reaction conditions for RT-RAA-LFD method

In this experiment, the temperature, time, and concentration of primer and probe in the AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 RT-RAA-LFD reaction systems were screened respectively. According to the judgment criteria of the optimal reaction conditions, the optimal time and temperature for AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 detection were 18 min at 37 °C, 20 min at 39 °C, and 18 min at 38 °C, respectively. The optimal concentrations of primers and probes of the three subtypes for detection were 1250 nmol/L (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Optimization of reaction temperature for RT-RAA-LFD method. (A), (B), and (C) were the optimized results of the reaction temperature of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RT-RAA-LFD method, respectively. In (A), clear detection lines were seen at 37–41 °C; in (B), clear detection lines were seen at 39–41 °C; in (C), clear detection lines were seen at 38–41 °C. According to the optimal reaction conditions, the one with the lowest required reaction temperature and a clear detection line was selected as the optimal temperature, 37 Â°C for AIV-H5, 39 Â°C for AIV-H7, and 38 Â°C for AIV-H9

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Optimization of reaction time of RT-RAA-LFD method. (A), (B), and (C) were the optimized results of the reaction time of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RT-RAA-LFD method, respectively. In (A) and (C) clear detection lines were visible at 18–26 min; in (B) the detection line was visible at 18–26 min, but the detection line at 18 min was not particularly clear, and the clearest detection line appeared around 20 min. According to the optimal reaction condition with the shortest required reaction time and clear detection line, 18 min was selected as the optimal time for AIV-H5 and AIV-H9, and 20 min was selected as the optimal time for AIV-H7

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Optimization of primer and probe concentrations for RT-RAA-LFD method. (A), (B), and (C) were the optimized results of primer and probe concentrations for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RT-RAA-LFD method, respectively. In (A), (B), and (C), the detection lines were seen when the concentrations of primer and probe were 1250 nmol/L, and the color of the detection lines became more obvious with the rise of the concentration. The required concentration of 1250 nmol/L was lower and the material loss was less. Therefore, 1250 nmol/L was selected as the optimal concentration

Full size image

Optimization of reaction conditions for RF-RT-RAA method

In this experiment, the reaction temperature and time for AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 were optimized, respectively. By observing the fluorescence signal value of the amplification curve and analyzing the slope of the amplification curve, it was concluded that the fluorescence value of AIV-H5 was the highest at 40 °C and the reaction efficiency was the best for 20 min; the fluorescence value of AIV-H7 was the highest at 38 °C and the reaction efficiency was the best for 16 min; the fluorescence value of AIV-H9 was the highest at 39 °C and the reaction efficiency was the best for 17 min (Fig. 4). According to the standard of optimal reaction conditions, the optimal reaction temperature and time for AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 detection were 40 °C, 20 min, 38 °C, 16 min, and 39 °C, 17 min, respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Optimization of reaction conditions for RF-RT-RAA method. (A), (B), and (C) were the optimized reaction conditions of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RF-RT-RAA method, respectively, which were 37 °C, 38 °C, 39 °C, 40 °C, and 41 °C from top to bottom. After a comprehensive analysis of fluorescence signal peak value and amplification efficiency, the optimal conditions were 40 °C, 20 min for AIV-H5, 38 °C, 16 min for AIV-H7, and 39 °C, 17 min for AIV-H9

Full size image

Specificity of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA methods

The results showed that both RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA were positive only in the primers and probes corresponding to the H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, on the contrary, all other groups were negative (Figs. 5 and 6). It could be proved that the primers and probes of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV designed in this study had high specificity and had no cross-reaction with other similar disease pathogens.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Specificity of RT-RAA-LFD method. (A), (B), and (C) were the specificity test results of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RT-RAA-LFD method, respectively. In (A), 1: AIV-H5, 2: AIV-H7, 3: AIV-H9; In (B), 1: AIV-H7, 2: AIV-H5, 3: AIV-H9; In (C), 1: AIV-H9, 2: AIV-H5, 3: AIV-H7; In (A), (B), and (C), 4–10 were AIV-H1N1, AIV-H3N2, Influenza B viruses (Victoria), Influenza B viruses (Yamagata), NDV, IBV, and ILTV, respectively. In (A), (B), and (C), only obvious red detection lines were observed on the corresponding test strips of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9, respectively, while other corresponding test strips showed negative results

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Specificity of RF-RT-RAA method. (A), (B), and (C) were the specificity results of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV RF-RT-RAA method, respectively. In (A), 1: AIV-H5, 2: AIV-H7, 3: AIV-H9; In (B), 1: AIV-H7, 2: AIV-H5, 3: AIV-H9; In (C), 1: AIV-H9, 2: AIV-H5, 3: AIV-H7; In (A), (B), and (C), 4–11 were AIV-H1N1, AIV-H3N2, Influenza B viruses (Victoria), Influenza B viruses (Yamagata), NDV, IBV, ILTV, and negative control, respectively. Only AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 showed obvious amplification curves in (A), (B), and (C), respectively, while no amplification curves appeared in other pathogens and negative controls

Full size image

Sensitivity of four methods of detection

AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 were detected by RT-RAA-LFD, RF-RT-RAA, RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis, and RFQ-RT-PCR, respectively. The minimum detection limit (MDL) of all three viruses by RT-RAA-LFD method was 102 copies/µL (Fig. 7); the MDL of all three viruses by RF-RT-RAA method could reach 101 copies /µL (Fig. 8); the results of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis showed that the MDL of AIV-H5 and AIV-H7 was 103 copies/µL, and the MDL of AIV-H9 was 104 copies/µL (Fig. 9). RFQ-RT-PCR was used to detect those three viruses with a minimum of 101 copies/µL (Fig. 10). Above results showed that the sensitivity of RT-RAA-LFD was slightly lower than RFQ-RT-PCR, which was 10 ∼100 times higher than that of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis. The sensitivity of RF-RT-RAA was consistent with RFQ-RT-PCR, which was 100 ∼1000 times higher than that of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis. It proved that RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA established in this study had high sensitivity.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Sensitivity of RT-RAA-LFD. (A), (B), and (C) were the sensitivity results of RT-RAA-LFD for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, respectively. 1–7 were plasmids of 106 copies/µL to 100 copies/µL, respectively; 8 was the negative control. In (A), (B), and (C), when the template concentration was 102 copies/µL, the detection lines were obvious, so the MDL of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, AIV-H9 RT-RAA-LFD method was all 102 copies/µL

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Sensitivity of RF-RT-RAA. (A), (B), and (C) were the sensitivity results of RF-RT-RAA for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, respectively. 1–5 were plasmids of 104 copies/µL to 100 copies/µL, respectively; 6 was the negative control. In (A), (B), and (C), when the template concentration was 101 copies/µL, obvious amplification curves were still visible, so the MDL of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, AIV-H9 RF-RT-RAA method was all 101 copies/µL

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Sensitivity of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis method. (A), (B), and (C) were the sensitivity results of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, respectively. (A), (B), and (C) were all cropped gel images, corresponding to Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 2, and Supplementary Fig. 3 in the Supplementary Information file, respectively, which showed the full-length gels. 1–8 were plasmids of 107 copies/µL to 100 copies/µL, respectively; 9 was the negative control. The template concentration in (A) and (B) was 103 copies/µL and the template concentration in (C) was 104 copies/µL, clear target bands could be seen. When the template concentrations were lower, no target bands could be seen, so the MDL of AIV-H5 and AIV-H7 RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis was 103 copies/µL, the MDL of AIV-H9 RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis was 104 copies/µL

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Sensitivity of RFQ-RT-PCR. (A), (B), and (C) were the sensitivity results of RFQ-RT-PCR for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, respectively. 1–7 were plasmids of 106 copies/µL to 100 copies/µL, respectively; 8 was the negative control. In (A), (B), and (C), when the template concentration was 101 copies /µL, the amplification curves were still obvious, so the MDL of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 in RFQ-RT-PCR was all 101 copies/µL

Full size image

Repeatability and stability of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA methods

The results of the RT-RAA-LFD method were shown in Fig. 11, three test groups showed positive and negative control showed negative. The results of the RF-RT-RAA method were shown in Table 1, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the three test groups of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 were all less than 5%. Above results indicated that the two detection methods established in this experiment had good repeatability and stability.

Table 1 Repeatability and stability of RF-RT-RAA method
Full size table
Fig. 11
figure 11

Repeatability and stability of RT-RAA-LFD method. (A), (B), and (C) in Fig. 11 were the repeatability and stability results of RT-RAA-LFD for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV, respectively. From left to right were three test groups and one negative control. In (A), (B), and (C), the results of the three test groups were positive and the results of the negative control were negative

Full size image

Clinical sample testing

RNA was extracted from 68 samples of sick chickens from farms with clinical symptoms that were suspected of AI, and AIV subtypes H5, H7, and H9 were detected, respectively. The results showed that only the AIV-H9 subtype was detected by RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis, RFQ-RT-PCR, RT-RAA-LFD, and RF-RT-RAA. Based on RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis, the clinical detection coincidence rate was 95.59% for RFQ-RT-PCR and RF-RT-RAA, 97.06% for RT-RAA-LFD (Table 2).

Table 2 The results of the four methods applied to the detection of clinical samples
Full size table

Discussion

AI has always been one of the major diseases plaguing the healthy development of the poultry industry. The outbreak of AI has brought huge economic losses to China and even the world, which can lead to human infection and death, threatening human health [28]. Therefore, the early and rapid detection of AIV is of great significance for its prevention and control.

It is common for different types of AIV to be caused by different HA subtypes. Therefore, this study aimed to establish RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA for distinguishing H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV. In this experiment, the HA gene was selected as the target sequence and DNAMAN software was used to analyze and compare the highly conserved and specific regions of each subtype sequence for designing primers and probes.

Different from other constant temperature detection methods, the RAA detection method only need a pair of preferred specific primers and probes, which is a new, rapid and sensitive in vitro isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology, the RT-RAA is based on RAA technology [29]. During the reaction, the compound, formed by the recombinase and the primers, finds the homologous sequence, following with a chain replacement reaction, which can rapidly amplify new DNA fragments in vitro after 15 ∼30 min reaction under isothermal conditions [30]. In this study, the RT-RAA-LFD method combined RT-RAA with LFD, using the nfo probe (46–52 bp) labeled with fluorescein (FAM) and forward/reverse primer (30–35 bp) labeled with biotin to realize the visualization of detection results. The probe has a tetrahydrofuran (THF) at least 30 bases away from the 5’ end and at least 15 bases away from the 3’ end, and the 3’ end is modified with a blocking group. The endonuclease does not work when the probe is single-stranded, but it can recognize and cleave THF when the probe binds to the homologous sequence to form a double-stranded amplification product, and finally forms a double-labeled amplification product with FAM and biotin. The detection results can be obtained within 3 min through LFD, realizing rapid and visual field detection [31]. The RF-RT-RAA method combines RT-RAA with exo probe (46–52 bp), which greatly improves the detection sensitivity and enables the detection of low-copy samples. Similarly, the THF site is labeled in the middle of the probe and required to be at least 30 bases away from the 5’ end and 15 bases away from the 3’ end. A fluorescent group and a quenching group were marked on both sides of the THF site respectively, and a blocking group was modified at the 3’ end. When the probe is single-stranded, the exonuclease does not work and the fluorescent signal emitted by the fluorescent group is absorbed by the quenching group. When the probe is combined with the homologous sequence to form a double-stranded amplification product, the exonuclease can recognize and cut THF, so that the signal emitted by the fluorescent group can be collected. With the extension of the amplification time, the fluorescent signal is continuously accumulated, which can be monitored in real time by the corresponding instrument.

Based on the above principle, RT-RAA technology was combined with test strip and fluorescent probe to establish two rapid detection methods for AIV in this experiment. In preliminary trials, to develop the two new methods for this study, multiple pairs of primers and probes were designed, and the best primers and probes were selected by agarose electrophoresis, based on the criteria of bright bands and conforming fragment size. The primers and probes used in this study were selected as optimal combinations. The results showed that the RT-RAA-LFD method can specifically amplify AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 under the reaction conditions of 37 °C, 18 min, 39 °C, 20 min, and 38 °C, 18 min, respectively. The detection results can be directly observed by naked eyes within 3 min, which is more suitable for on-site detection. The RF-RT-RAA method can specifically amplify AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 under the reaction conditions of 40 °C, 20 min, 38 °C, 16 min, and 39 °C, 17 min, respectively. It can monitor the amplification process and results in real time, which is more suitable for accurate laboratory diagnosis. Both RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA established in this study have strong specificity and have no cross-reaction with pathogens with similar symptoms during the detection process. The detection has high sensitivity, the MDL of RT-RAA-LFD method is 102 copies/µL, which is consistent with the sensitivity of RT-RAA-LFD method established by Wang et al. [32, 33], and is 10 ∼100 times higher than that of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis; the MDL of RF-RT-RAA method is 101 copies/µL, which is slightly higher than the sensitivity of hepatitis B virus RAA method established by Shen et al. [34], and which is the same as that of African classical swine fever virus real-time fluorescence RAA method established by Zhao et al. [35] and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 RF-RT-RAA method established by Wu et al. [36], which is 100 ∼1000 times higher than that of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis and consistent with the sensitivity of RFQ-RT-PCR method. In order to verify the stability of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA established in this study, we conducted a repeatability test, and the test results showed that the two methods had good repeatability and stability, the CV of RF-RT-RAA was less than 5%. In clinical application, both the coincidence rates between the two detection methods and ordinary agarose electrophoresis method are higher than 95%. In recent years, the main subtype of AIV prevalent in North China is H9, so only this subtype was detected in clinical samples. The results of this study were consistent with relevant literature reports [37, 38].

Conclusion

In conclusion, based on RT-RAA technology, this study successfully established RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA for AIV detection. Both two methods had the advantages of short detection time, simple operation, strong specificity, and high sensitivity, which were suitable for early, rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnosis of AIV in clinical field. RT-RAA-LFD was more suitable for grass-roots application with limited conditions, and RF-RT-RAA was more suitable for real-time monitoring in laboratories. The successful establishment of the two methods could provide help for AIV epidemiological investigation.

Methods

Nucleic acid extraction

The RNA of H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV and Newcastle disease virus (NDV), as well as the cDNA of AIV-H1N1 (A/Hebei/F076/2018), AIV-H3N2 (A/Hebei/BD79/2018), Influenza B viruses (Victoria) (B/Hebei/CZ176/2018), and Influenza B viruses (Yamagata) (B/Hebei/HS639/2018) were preserved in the Animal Infectious Disease Laboratory of Hebei Agricultural University. Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV, AV1511) and avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV, AV195) were purchased from China Veterinary Drug Administration. The viral DNA/RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to extract the DNA or RNA of the sample for later use.

Design of primers and probes

The hemagglutinin gene sequences of H5 (GenBank: CY014311.1), H7 (GenBank: MK453331.1), and H9 (GenBank: KP865956.1) subtypes were compared, respectively, and the conserved regions were selected. Primers and probes were designed according to the design principles of RT-RAA primers and probes. The preferred primers and probes were sent to the biotechnology company (Sangon Bioengineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for synthesis and labeling (Table 3).

Table 3 Design and modification of preferred primers and probes for H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of AIV
Full size table

Establishment of RT-RAA-LFD reaction system

The reaction system was constructed according to the instructions of RT-RAA nucleic acid amplification kit (test strip method) (Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China): base buffer 25 µL, RT-RAA-LFD forward and reverse primers (10 µM) 2.1 µL, RT-RAA-LFD probe 0.6 µL, template 1 µL, purified water 16.7 µL, and finally 2.5 µL of magnesium acetate were added. The forward and reverse primers, probe, and template were corresponding to H5, H7, and H9 subtypes one by one, the same as below. The reaction tube was placed in the RAA-B6100 constant temperature oscillation mixer (Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China) for the reaction, the temperature was set to 39 Â°C and the time was 30 min. After the reaction, the nucleic acid amplification product was diluted 20 times with sterile ddH2O, thoroughly mixed, and 80 µL of diluted amplification product was dropped onto the sample hole of the test strip (Jiennuo Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). After the quality control line (C) was colored, the test result of the test line (T) was read within 15 min.

Judgment standard: if the test strip only shows the C, the result is negative; if the test strip shows both the C and the T, the result is positive.

Optimization of reaction conditions for RT-RAA-LFD detection method

The RT-RAA-LFD reaction temperature was set to 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 Â°C, respectively; the reaction was carried out according to the optimized temperature, and the reaction time was set to 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, and 26 min, respectively; the reaction was carried out according to the optimized temperature and time, and the concentration gradients of primers and probes were 10,000, 5000, 2500, 1250, and 625 nmol/L, respectively. By comparing the reaction results, the color of the test line of the strip was observed. According to the single variable principle, the optimal reaction conditions could be judged by the following criteria: the lowest temperature, the lowest time, and the lowest primer and probe concentration required to achieve a clear detection line under different conditions.

Establishment of RF-RT-RAA reaction system

A 50 µL reaction system was constructed according to the instructions of RT-RAA nucleic acid amplification kit (fluorescence method) (Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China): buffer 25 µL, RF-RT-RAA forward and reverse primers (10 µM) 2.1 µL each, RF-RT-RAA probe 0.6 µL, the remaining reagents and dosages were the same as RT-RAA-LFD. The primers and probes used for the H5, H7, and H9 detections were applied with the set of primers and probes corresponding to the names in Table 3, respectively, the same as below. The reaction tube with the added sample was placed in the pre-heated RAA-B6100 constant temperature oscillation mixer for pre-amplification. After that, the reaction tube was taken out and put into the constant temperature nucleic acid amplification detector RAA-F1620 (Qitian Gene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China). The reaction condition was set to 39 °C for 30 min, and the results were observed in real time.

Judgment standard: after the reaction, set the slope (k) to 20, and the instrument will automatically present the determination result. The result of k ≥ 20 of the fluorescence curve is positive.

Optimization of reaction conditions for RF-RT-RAA detection method

The reaction temperatures of RF-RT-RAA were set at 37, 38, 39, 40, and 41 °C, respectively, and the reaction time was set at 30 min. The optimal reaction conditions were as follows: under different temperatures, the temperature with the highest fluorescence signal value was the optimal reaction temperature; only when the slope of the amplification curve reached the positive criterion (k ≥ 20) and its speed maintained stability, the optimal reaction time would present in the shortest time.

Specificity test of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA for detection of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9

According to the optimized reaction system, the RNA, cDNA or DNA of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, AIV-H9, AIV-H1N1, AIV-H3N2, Influenza B viruses (Victoria), Influenza B viruses (Yamagata), NDV, IBV, and ILTV was used as the template, and the forward and reverse primers and probes corresponding to H5, H7, and H9 subtypes were used to evaluate the specificity of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA.

Construction of plasmid standard

Viral RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA for PCR amplification in the following system: 2×Taq Mix 25 µL, cDNA template 2 µL, RT-PCR forward and reverse primers (10 µM) 1 µL each, purified water 21 µL filled to 50 µL, the forward and reverse primers and template according to the H5, H7, and H9 subtypes one by one. Reaction program: 94 Â°C for 5 min; denaturation at 94 Â°C for 30 s, annealing at 52 Â°C for 30 s, extension at 72 Â°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of extension at 72 Â°C for 5 min, and storage at 4 Â°C. The gel was recovered by 2% agarose electrophoresis, purified and connected to the pMD20-T vector, then introduced into the competent cells. After the blue-white screening, suitable colonies were selected for overnight culture and plasmid extraction. The DNA copies number per unit volume of plasmid was calculated according to Moore’s law. The calculation formula is as follows: plasmid copy number (copies/µL) = [plasmid concentration (g/µL) × 6.02 × 1023] / [total fragment length (bp) × 660 g/mol], total fragment length = vector length (bp) + fragment length (bp).

The constructed standard plasmid was diluted to a gradient concentration of 109-100 copies/µL by 10-fold dilution method, and was stored at -20 Â°C for future use.

Sensitivity test of four methods to detect AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9

The templates of RT-RAA-LFD method were 106-100 copies/µL plasmid in turn, and the reaction results were observed through the detection line of the test strip. The templates of RF-RT-RAA method were 104-100 copies/µL plasmid in turn, and the reaction results were observed by fluorescence signal. The templates of RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis were 107-100 copies/µL of plasmid in turn, and 2% agarose electrophoresis was used to observe the results. The RFQ-RT-PCR reaction system included TB Green Premix Ex Taqâ„¢ II (TliRNaseH Plus) (2X) 12.5 µL, RT-PCR forward and reverse primers (10 µM) 1 µL each, template (106-100 copies/µL plasmid) 1 µL, filled with purified water to 25 µL, reaction procedure: 95 °C for 30s; the results were observed after 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Negative water control was set for the above tests.

Repeatability and stability test of RT-RAA-LFD and RF-RT-RAA for detection of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9

In order to verify the repeatability and stability of the two detection methods, the same concentration of AIV-H5, AIV-H7, and AIV-H9 plasmids were used as templates (102 copies/µL for RT-RAA-LFD and 104 copies/µL for RF-RT-RAA), and each was repeated by three times, and negative control was set. The optimized RT-RAA-LFD method and RF-RT-RAA method were used for the test. The time recorded when the fluorescence curve reached the positive standard and the CV was calculated.

Detection of clinical samples

The clinical samples were collected from several individual chicken farms in northern China, and the animals were released after collecting throat swabs. The sick birds mainly presented with mild or severe respiratory symptoms, consistent with the clinical symptoms of AI. Sixty-eight throat swabs were collected and detected by RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis, RFQ-RT-PCR, RT-RAA-LFD, and RF-RT-RAA, respectively. The coincidence rates of several detection methods were compared based on RT-PCR-agarose electrophoresis.

Data availability

The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AI:

Avian influenza

AIV:

Avian influenza virus

WOAH:

World Organization for Animal Health

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RFQ-RT-PCR:

Real-time fluorescence quantification reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RPA:

Recombinase polymerase amplification

RAA:

Recombinase-aided amplification

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

LFD:

Lateral flow dipstick

HA:

Hemagglutinin

RT-RAA:

Reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification

RT-RAA-LFD:

Reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification lateral flow dipstick

RF-RT-RAA:

Real-time fluorescence reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification

MDL:

Minimum detection limit

FAM:

Fluorescein

THF:

Tetrahydrofuran

CV:

Coefficient of variation

NDV:

Newcastle disease virus

IBV:

Infectious bronchitis virus

ILTV:

Avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus

C:

Control line

T:

Test line

RF:

Real-time fluorescence

References

  1. Li Y, Ye HL, Liu M, Song SQ, Chen J, Cheng WK, Yan LP. Development and evaluation of a monoclonal antibody-based competitive ELISA for the detection of antibodies against H7 avian influenza virus. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17(1):64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin H, Jin Y, Wang YF, Liu B, Zou MQ. Amplification-free detection of H7 subtype avian influenza virus with CRISPR-Cas13a. Chin Front Health Quarant. 2022;45(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tang WJ, Li XY, Tang L, Wang TH, He GM. Characterization of the low-pathogenic H7N7 avian influenza virus in Shanghai, China. Poult Sci. 2021;100(2):565–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu M, Song QQ, Li YF, Xu QG, Peng DX, Liu XF. Genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of one H6N6 subtype avian influenza virus A/duck/Jiangsu/022/2009. Chin J Zoonoses. 2010;26(7):642–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Liu HJ, Li X, Lv XR, Chai HL. Global epidemiology of H5N8 subtype highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. Acta Microbiol Sinica. 2022;62(1):10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belser JA, Bridges CB, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. Past, present, and possible future human infection with influenza virus a subtype H7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(6):859–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rebel JMJ, Peeters B, Fijten H, Post J, Cornelissen J, Vervelde L. Highly pathogenic or low pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H7N1 infection in chicken lungs: small differences in general acute responses. Vet Res. 2011;42(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu KT, Gao RY, Wang XQ, Liu XF. The development of epidemiology and pathogenic mechanism of avian influenza virus in pigeons. Chin J Virol. 2021;37(2):483–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guan Y, Liu ZT, Wang X, He WT, Li WQ, Li JR, Chen ZX, Zhao BB, Cao WY, Jiao PR. H5 avian influenza prevalence and epidemic features in recent years in China. Chin J Anim Infect Dis. 2020;28(5):72–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu YL, Wang ND, Gao XY, Huang YH, Chen YH, Liu Y, Gu XX, Yuan L, Yang L, Xin SP, et al. Preparation of qualitative reference material for detection of nucleic acid of avian influenza a virus. Chin Vet Sci. 2021;51(05):575–80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xiao YX, Yang F, Liu FM, Yao HP, Wu NP, Wu HB. Antigen-capture ELISA and immunochromatographic test strip to detect the H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus rapidly based on monoclonal antibodies. Virol J. 2021;18(1):198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yehia N, Eldemery F, Arafa A-S, Abd El Wahed A, El Sanousi A, Weidmann M, Shalaby M. Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Rapid Detection of Avian Influenza Virus H9N2 HA gene. Vet Sci. 2021;8(7):134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kandie R, Ochola R, Njaanake K. Evaluation of fluorescent in-situ hybridization technique for diagnosis of malaria in Ahero Sub-county hospital, Kenya. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Deiman B, van Aarle P, Sillekens P. Characteristics and applications of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Mol Biotechnol. 2002;20:163–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao SD, Chang HY, Cong GZ, Du JZ, Shao JJ, Lin T. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and its applications in viral diagnosis. Chin Biotechnol. 2009;29(1):80–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liang HY, Liu WX, Yang ZG. Progress of isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques. Chin Med Innov. 2017;14(16):145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(12):e63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Golabi M, Flodrops M, Grasland B, Vinayaka AC, Quyen TL, Nguyen T, Bang DD, Wolff A. Development of reverse transcription Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for Rapid and On-Site detection of Avian Influenza Virus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:652048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tu F, Zhang YN, Xu SK, Yang XT, Zhou L, Ge XN, Han J, Guo X, Yang HC. Detection of pseudorabies virus with a real-time recombinase-aided amplification assay. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69(4):2266–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li YD, Yu ZR, Jiao SL, Liu YH, Ni HX, Wang Y. Development of a recombinase-aided amplification assay for rapid and sensitive detection of porcine circovirus 3. J Virol Methods. 2020;282:113904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li JS, Hao YZ, Hou ML, Zhang X, Zhang XG, Cao YX, Li JM, Ma J, Zhou ZX. Development of a recombinase-aided amplification combined with lateral Flow Dipstick Assay for the Rapid Detection of the African swine fever virus. Biomed Environ Sci. 2022;35(2):133–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lv B, Cheng HR, Yan QF, Huang ZJ, Li YN, Luo D, Shen GF, Zhang ZF, Deng ZX, Lin M, et al. In vitro nucleic acid amplification technology fast development and constant innovation. Chin Biotechnol. 2011;31(3):91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fan XX, Li L, Zhao YG, Liu YT, Liu CJ, Wang QH, Dong YQ, Wang SJ, Chi TY, Song FF, et al. Clinical validation of two recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays (RPA/RAA) for the Rapid Detection of African Swine Fever Virus. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lv XN, Xu LP, Zhang W, Cao H, Wang XL, Wang S, Wang JB. Development of a recombinase-aid amplification assay combined with lateral flow dipstick for the detection of carp edema virus. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2020;42(3):263–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xue GH, Li SL, Zhao HQ, Yan C, Feng YL, Cui JH, Jiang TT, Yuan J. Use of a rapid recombinase-aided amplification assay for Mycoplasma pneumoniae detection. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin H, Zhao S, Liu YH, Shao L, Ying QJ, Yang K. Development of a fluorescent recombinase-aided isothermal amplification-based nucleic acid assay for detection of Leishmania. Chin J Schisto Control. 2021;33(5):452–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Feng ZS, Li JY, Zhang JY, Li FY, Guan HX, Zhang RQ, Liu H, Guo Q, Shen XX, Kan B, et al. Development and evaluation of a sensitive recombinase aided amplification assay for rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Microbiol Methods. 2022;193:106404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blagodatski A, Trutneva K, Glazova O, Mityaeva O, Shevkova L, Kegeles E, Onyanov N, Fede K, Maznina A, Khavina E, et al. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and Virus Ecology. Pathogens. 2021;10(5):630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma QN, Wang M, Zhu XQ. Research advances in recombinase-aided amplification technology and its application in rapid detection of pathogenic microorganisms. Chin Biotechnol. 2021;41(6):45–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Q, Ding X, Wu XM, Liu YH, Liu JF, Xu XZ, Ying QJ, Cao J, Dai Y. Establishment and preliminary evaluation of recombinase aided isothermal amplification (RAA) assay for specific nucleic acid detection of Clonorchis sinensis. Chin J Schisto Control. 2019;31(5):468–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen WX, Fan JD, Li ZY, Zhang YY, Qin YW, Wu KK, Li XW, Li YW, Fan SQ, Zhao MQ. Development of recombinase aided amplification combined with Disposable Nucleic Acid Test Strip for Rapid Detection of Porcine Circovirus Type 2. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:676294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang WJ, Wang CG, Zhang P, Yao SS, Liu JR, Zhai XH, Zhang T. Reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification assay combined with a lateral flow dipstick for detection of avian infectious bronchitis virus. Poult Sci. 2020;99(1):89–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang WJ, Li XY, Zhang P, Liu JR, Yao SS, Wang CG, Zhang T. Establishment of visual detection method for avian influenza RT-RAA lateral flow dipstick. Chin J Vet Sci. 2020;40(11):2159–63.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shen XX, Qiu FZ, Shen LP, Yan TF, Zhao MC, Qi JJ, Chen C, Zhao L, Wang L, Feng ZS, et al. A rapid and sensitive recombinase aided amplification assay to detect hepatitis B virus without DNA extraction. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao KY, Zeng DX, Hu YX, Qian BX, Xue F, Qian YJ, Wu XD, Dai JJ. Establishment of a real-time recombinase aided amplification (RAA) for the detection of African swine fever virus. Chin Vet Sci. 2021;51(01):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wu T, Ge YY, Zhao KC, Zhu XJ, Chen Y, Wu B, Zhu FC, Zhu BL, Cui LB. A reverse-transcription recombinase-aided amplification assay for the rapid detection of N gene of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2). Virology. 2020;549:1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li WS. Epidemiological analysis of avian influenza virus in Hebi City, Henan Province from 2018 to 2023. Guide Chin Poult. 2024;41(03):41–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jia WX, Liao M. The current situation of H5N1 avian influenza epidemic and its impact on domestic poultry industry. Poult Husb Dis Control. 2022;(06):2–4.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Laboratory of the College of Animal Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University for providing viruses.

Funding

This work was supported by the S&T Program of Hebei (22326608D) from Science and Technology Department, Hebei Province, China. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zongshu Zhang and Zichuang Zhang have contributed equally to this study and share the first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China

    Zongshu Zhang, Chunguang Wang, Xianghe Zhai, Wenjing Wang, Xi Chen & Tie Zhang

  2. Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

    Zichuang Zhang

Authors
  1. Zongshu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zichuang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunguang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xianghe Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenjing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZZ1, WW, XZ, and TZ* designed the experiments and performed the experiments. ZZ1 and WW analyzed the data. ZZ1, ZZ2, and CW wrote and revised the manuscript. The clinical samples used in the experiments were collected by XC. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tie Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Clinical samples used in this study were collected from several individual chicken farms in northern China, and informed consent was obtained from the farm owners before animals were used in the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Ethics Committee of Hebei Agricultural University. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, C. et al. Detection method for reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification of avian influenza virus subtypes H5, H7, and H9. BMC Vet Res 20, 203 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04040-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04040-9

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us