Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exposure to chemical pollutants and biological aerosol in indoor facilities for recreational and sport horses

BMC Veterinary Research volume 20, Article number: 78 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Due to the increasing prevalence of equine non-infectious respiratory disease, the air contamination in equine housing (Stables A-C) and training facilities (indoor riding arenas A - C) was investigated. The aim of the study was to monitor gaseous pollutants, bioaerosols, and dust concentrations at three different sites (stables and riding halls), where different floor materials were used in the riding halls.

Materials and methods

Air quality was monitored in housing for horses and in riding halls in terms of dust concentration, the presence of gaseous chemical pollutants, and concentrations of biological aerosol. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The levels obtained were compared with acceptable limits.

Results

Among the gaseous pollutants identified, the highest concentration was obtained for ammonia in stables B and C (16.37 and 22.39 mg/m3, respectively). Standards for total dust were exceeded in stables B and C and in riding halls B and C. The highest numbers of bacteria and fungi were recorded in stables A and C and in riding hall B. Ulocladium sp. had the highest percentage share among the moulds identified.

Conclusions

The results confirm that the wrong choice of bedding in the stable and indoor riding arenas may contribute, even in short training periods, to equine non-infectious respiratory disease (equine asthma). Bioaerosol suspended in the air together with released gaseous pollutants can exacerbate this phenomenon, which even in the case of short training periods can lead to equine asthma of varying degrees of severity. For this reason, the choice of floor material in riding halls should be treated as a priority, as the wrong decision can shorten the period during which the horse can be used for recreational purposes.

Peer Review reports

Background

The crucial factors determining the health of horses include their housing system and the environmental conditions in indoor spaces (boxes, stables, and riding halls) [1, 2]. Staying in buildings with inadequate air exchange parameters and excessive concentrations of pollutants can lead to respiratory disease. It is particularly difficult to maintain optimal microclimate parameters in the autumn and winter, when the CO2 concentration and relative humidity in stables increase, which can increase the number of breaths taken by horses and impede adequate oxygenation of the body [3, 4]. Changes caused by bacterial enzymes in animal waste and feed residues lead to the release of ammonia, which irritates the lungs and impairs the immune system, causing immune incompetence in animals and increasing their susceptibility to microbiological pollution [5,6,7]. Dust concentration plays an important role in the spread of microbes in the air of indoor facilities for animals. In winter, the levels of total and respirable dust and (1.3)-β-D-glucan are higher than in summer [8]. These factors lead to an increase in neutrophil counts in the blood and in expression of IL-6 at the mRNA level. Researchers suggest monitoring markers of pulmonary inflammation in horses kept in traditional stables as markers of the state of the microclimate in indoor spaces [9].

The most common disease resulting from poor air quality is chronic aseptic inflammation called “equine asthma” [6, 10, 11]. Due to similar clinical symptoms to other diseases, it is necessary to diagnose respiratory system disorders that not only affect the health of horses but also their performance in various equestrian disciplines [11, 12]. According to Bond et al. [13], progressive respiratory inflammation in horses often stems from poor microclimatic conditions. Monitoring the air contamination in the stables is essential for the prevention of equine asthma and therefore is also substantial for their quality of life [14, 15]. To avoid the negative effects of microclimatic factors and poor-quality floor material (litter) on the health of horses and workers, indoor spaces that may have an aerogenic effect require monitoring. Therefore, a study was carried out to monitor released chemical pollutants and biological aerosol in stables and riding halls with varied microclimatic conditions and different types of floor material. The results may suggest to users about the microclimatic conditions and choice of floor material during recreational use of horses.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites

The study was carried out at three stables (SA, SB, and SC) and the indoor riding halls (RHA, RHB, and RHC). Each building varied in terms of its modernity and the timing of its modernization. The type of ventilation in all buildings was natural gravity ventilation.

Site A was the newest (built in 2005–2007), a wooden stable with boxes facing outward, housing 25 horses during the study period. Quartz sand was used as the floor material in their riding hall.

Site B – a decades-old stable (built in 1918) and riding hall (built in the 1970s), following slight modernization. The floor material in their riding hall was sand, regularly replenished and supplemented with sawdust. During the study there were 12 horses in the buildings.

Site C – a farm (stables were built in the 1960s, and the riding hall at the turn of the 20th century) where space was made for horses to stay in boxes, alongside other animals, and their indoor riding hall was filled with sand mixed with fine gravel. There were 10 horses in the stables during the study period.

The bedding material in all stables was straw. The study was carried out during a typical nominal workday, when these conditions prevail. ‘Standard’ may not be the best word. The samples were taken in close proximity to the horses, up to about 30 cm. The work day during which the study was conducted can be described as representative. The workers carried out their activities associated with handling of the animals or their use for recreational purposes.

Chemical and biological analysis

Monitoring of microclimatic conditions was carried out in all examined facilities in the autumn and winter, when temperatures are lower and when breeders close the stable doors so it will not be too cold. Samples for analysis of gaseous pollutants in the air of three stables and riding halls were collected into Tedlar® bags (Sensidyne, Inc., Clearwater, USA) using an electric pump and then condensed on MX-06-2131 sorbent tubes (SKC Inc., Pennsylvania, USA). Then thermal desorption was carried out (Dynatherm, Analytical Instruments, Inc., Oxford, USA), and the sample was injected into a gas chromatograph with an FPD detector (HP 5890 series II, Hewlett Packard, Santa Clara, USA). Thermal desorption tubes were analysed by GC–MS (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) using a thermal desorption system with a 0.25 μm FFAP column. Compounds were identified using mass spectra and retention times of reference standards and/or mass spectra from the NIST98 library (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD), at a match level of > 70%. Chromatograms of the gases were prepared in a permeation chamber heated to the optimal temperature for the tube. The peaks of the gases were identified on the basis of baselines, and the procedure and operation of the chromatographic system were identical for the reference and test samples. Compounds were quantified using external standards and estimates based on molecular weight and chemical class [16].

In the stables and riding halls, three half-hour measurements of the dust concentration were made by the gravimetric method using an SKC air sampler with an SKC IOM cassette (SKC Ltd, USA) and a GilAir 5 sampler (Sensidyne, Inc. Clearwater, USA) with an HD Cyclone head for respirable dust. The total and respirable dust fractions were measured using conditioned Whatman GF/A filters with a diameter of 25 mm (no. 1820-025) with air flow of 2 m/s2 and 2.2 m/s2, respectively. After each sampling the cassette was replaced. The cassettes were sealed during transport. In the laboratory, the samples were conditioned and weighed using an XA 110 analytical balance (Radwag, Radom, Poland) with accuracy (d) within 0.01 mg. The dust concentration was calculated as the ratio of the weight of dust retained in the filters to the volume of filtered air. Microclimatic parameters, i.e. temperature, humidity, and air movement, were measured during the study using a thermohygrometer (Termo-higrometr AB-3321, Abatronic Sp. zo.o., Radom, Poland) and an anemometer (Hot Wire Anemometer AM-4204, Lutron, Taipei, Taiwan).

Biological aerosol in the stables and riding halls was measured using a MicroBio MB1 sampler with a 220-hole head. There were 6 measurement points at each site, and the measurements were repeated at each point. Sampling Volume per Sample was set at 100 L of air (De Ville Biotechnology, Raszyn, Poland). Following incubation of plates, the results were expressed as colony forming units (CFU) per m3 of air. For the quantitative assessment of bacterial aerosol, TSA (tryptone-soybean-agar; BTL Polska Sp. z o.o.) was used, MEA (Malt Extract Agar; BTL Polska Sp. z o.o.) was used for fungal aerosol, and MacConkey medium for coliform bacteria was used. Moulds were identified using microcultures on the basis of keys [17,18,19,20,21]. The percentage shares of the taxa identified were calculated, assuming that the total number of fungi was 100%. Analysis of bacterial aerosol was based on quantitative determination of CFU/m3.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of all results was performed using Statistica software ver. 13.3. Mean values were determined for each site. The results were given as means (M), standard deviation (SD) and standard error of the mean (SEM). Analysis of variance of the data was performed, checking the normality of the distribution, and the level of statistical significance was adopted for p < 0.05. For data that were not normally distributed, the criteria for ANOVA were not met, so Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA was used. Statistically significant values were designated with different letters (a, b…). MS Excel Solver as a tool that can be used to find the optimum value, which can be the maximum or minimum, was used to model dust concentrations in the stables in relation to the acceptable limits in Poland has been determined to be 3 mg/m3. This value satisfies animal welfare requirements, including microclimate conditions, and is given by [1].

Results

Concentrations of gaseous pollutants in the air

The results obtained for the concentrations of gaseous pollutants in the air at sites A, B, and C are presented in Table 1. The highest concentration for hydrogen sulphide was obtained in stable C (33.87 µg/m3). The lowest values for this pollutant were recorded in stable A (17.26 µg/m3; Table 1).

Among the inorganic compounds identified in the air at the sites, the highest concentration was obtained for ammonia in riding hall C (0.43 mg/m3; Table 1). Among the inorganic substances identified in the air of the stables, the highest level was obtained for ammonia in stable C (22.39 mg/m3), as in the case of the riding halls (Table 1).

Table 1 Concentrations of inorganic pollutants in the air of the riding halls and stables at each site (mg/m3; N = 12)
Full size table

Dust concentration in the air

The measurements of dust concentrations took into account total and respirable dust. In the riding halls, the highest total dust concentration was noted in riding hall C (15.33 mg/m3), and the lowest in riding hall A (0.96 mg/m3). In the case of respirable dust, the highest concentration was noted in riding halls A and C (9.08 mg/m3 and 9 mg/m3, respectively), and the lowest in riding hall B (1.78 mg/m3; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Average dust concentration in riding halls (mg/m3) (RHA, RHB, RHC - individual riding halls)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Average dust concentration in stables (mg/m3) (SA, SB, SC - individual stables)

Full size image

In the stables, the highest total dust concentration was noted in stable C (7.92 mg/m3), and the lowest in stable A (0.38 mg/m3). In the case of respirable dust, the highest level was obtained in stable C (2.61 mg/m3), and the lowest in stable A (0.84 mg/m3; Fig. 2).

For comparison with acceptable limits for horses, modelling in MS Excel Solver was used to determine the length of time that was safe for horses to remain in the buildings (Tables 2 and 3). The dust concentrations allow horses to remain safely in riding hall A for 52 min, but only for a few minutes in riding halls B and C (Table 2).

Table 2 Dust concentrations in riding halls modelled in MS Excel Solver in relation to acceptable limits (3 mg/m3)
Full size table
Table 3 Dust concentrations in stables modelled in MS Excel Solver in relation to acceptable limits (3 mg/m3)
Full size table

For comparison with acceptable limits for horses, modelling in MS Excel Solver was used to determine the length of time that was safe for horses to remain in the stables (Table 3). Horses can remain safely in stable A for 131 min (about 2 h), but for only a few minutes in stables B and C (Table 3).

Comparison of the results reveals a significant problem arising from the high dust concentration in the stables in relation to the time the horses spend in them.

Bioaerosol

The results obtained for the bioaerosol concentrations in the air of the stables are presented in Table 4. The highest number of bacteria was noted in stable B (1.05 × 105 CFU/m3), and it was statistically significantly higher than in stable A (6.4 × 104 CFU/m3). On the other hand, the number of fungi was higher in the air of stable C (6.2 × 103 CFU/m3). The number of bacteria was highest in the air in riding hall B (5.8 × 104 CFU/m3) and was statistically significant at p < 0.007 (Table 4).

Table 4 Average bioaerosol concentration in the stables and riding halls [CFU/m3]
Full size table

Among the moulds identified, Ulocladium sp. accounted for the highest percentage. This percentage was highest in stable A (83.33%) and riding hall A (50.0%; Table 5).

Table 5 Percentages of mould taxa in air samples from the buildings (%)
Full size table

Temperature and humidity

Microclimatic parameters (temperature, relative humidity, and air movement) were measured in the stables and riding halls during the study. The results are presented in Table 6. The air temperature in the stables ranged from 4.63 °C (B) to 8.07 °C (A), with relative humidity from 71.57% (C) to 74.30% (B) and air movement from 0.12 m/s2 (A) to 0.27 m/s2 (C). In the riding halls the air temperature was between 3.5 °C (C) and 8.77 °C (B), with relative humidity from 53.22% (B) to 73.53% (A) and air movement from 0.23 m/s2 (A) to 0.3 m/s2 (C) (Table 6).

Table 6 Microclimatic parameters in the stables and riding halls (N = 12)
Full size table

Discussion

Air quality is a very important factor influencing the occurrence of respiratory disease in horses, hence the high level of interest in the effect of the floor material in the riding hall where training takes place and bedding in the boxes where the horses rest [22]. White et al. [23] report that there are numerous allergens in the horse’s environment which can lead to severe equine asthma (sEA). Asthma in horses limits their use. Air quality is determined by numerous factors, including the quality of the feed, the type of bedding, the floor material used in riding halls and how often it is changed, and maintenance of cleanliness in the boxes and paddocks [24, 25]. Relationships are observed between the presence of organic and respirable dust and chronic bronchitis in riding instructors, which suggests that horses can be an excellent model for assessment of the quality of this environment [26]. Particular attention should be paid to the riding hall, where during increased physical activity the animal takes in more air, and with it increased levels of harmful chemical and biological agents. This problem concerns artificial surfaces as well [17, 26, 27]. In stables during winter, the relative humidity should not exceed 80%, assuming that the temperature in the stable is less than 10oC [28]. In studies by Elfman et al. the average level of dust concentration was 0.6 mg/m3 [28]. Referring to the Swedish guidelines for horses (10 mg/m3), the obtained total dust values in our own research did not record any exceedances of these values, with the exception of riding school C [29].

According to the European Committee for Standardization (Comité Européen de Normalization), the smaller the particle size (< PM 0.1), the greater risk the particles pose to the body, as they diffuse to the lower respiratory system and penetrate the alveoli. Therefore, assessment of biological aerosol and dust concentrations in stables and riding halls must take into account the size of the particles in the air. Wheeler et al. [30], in a study conducted in equestrian arenas, showed that in a riding hall with a sand floor, 60% of the dust collected was respirable. In riding halls, A and C, the percentage of respirable dust during training of horses was higher than at site B. Gesche and Engel [17] demonstrated interactions between dust concentrations and the month of the year as well as the time spent by the animals in the riding hall. The authors point out that moistening the surface can reduce the dust concentration in the air.

The German Senate Standing Committee on the Investigation of Harmful Working Materials (Ständige Senatskommission zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe) gives normative values for individual dust fractions. The acceptable concentration of the respirable fraction of granular dust was determined to be 0.3 mg/m3, while the limit for the total dust concentration is 4 mg/m3. In the present study, these recommended levels were exceeded in stables B and C. Using the MS Excel Solver model in relation to the acceptable levels, safe time periods for horses in air with sustained long-term dust concentrations were obtained. The presence of suspended particulates (PM 10 and PM 2.5) in the horses’ breathing zone is conducive to the accumulation of mucus in the trachea and an increase in inflammatory cells. In addition to dust, Penicillium spp., Cladosporium spp. and Aspergillus spp. are often suspended in the air [16, 17, 31]. For this reason, it is important to pay attention to the air exchange in the stable and, at the planning stage, to the orientation of the stable. In the present study, Ulocladium spp. and Aspergillus spp. had the highest percentage shares of the moulds. Moulds of the genus Ulocladium spp. are found in feed, air, soil, and even building materials, carrying out biodeterioration [32]. The presence of this biological aerosol depends on the quality of feed, the sanitary condition of the facilities, and microclimatic conditions. Due to the use of horses for sport and recreational purposes, there is a need to monitor the air quality, especially during training sessions in the riding hall, in order to reduce the horses’ exposure to dust particles on which bioaerosol is suspended. Keeping in mind that workers are also exposed to these pollutants [33]. Optimal microclimatic conditions positively influence the welfare of horses. These levels were maintained in the present study [34].

It should be borne in mind, however, that ammonia is generated from the degradation of nitrogen compounds in manure and from conversion of urea by urease and microorganisms present in bedding [20]. According to Elfman et al. [28], Ivester et al. [11], and Saastamoinen et al. [35], the ammonia concentration in the building is influenced by the bedding in the stable and the floor material in the riding hall. Inhalation of ammonia by horses, especially those used for sport and recreation, can lead to conjunctivitis and also increases susceptibility to respiratory disease. At low concentrations, ammonia mainly affects the upper respiratory tract, while increased concentrations and prolonged exposure lead to metabolic disorders of the liver and secretion in the form of urea. Intensive use of horses, especially sport horses, can furthermore lead to oxidative stress and have a negative impact on welfare [36].

Biological (fungi) and chemical agents (PM 10, PM 2.5, NO, NO2, and SO2) in the air play a major role in diseases of the lower and upper respiratory tract. Training causes the horse to take in more air, and physical exertion results in bronchodilation and an increase in the respiratory rate and tidal volume. NO plays an important role in regulating airway function by signalling that the airways are relaxed. It also regulates the animal’s immune response and controls the release of various inflammatory substances involved in inflammatory responses. Their concentration in the air may be a biomarker of the respiratory [37,38,39]. Araneda [40] observed that air pollution affects the performance of horses used for sport and draws attention to a wide range of effects of inhaled air components on the body. According to Whittaker et al. [41] in stables and riding halls with an efficient ventilation system the main factor determining exposure to air pollutants and respirable dust is the floor material and feed [42]. Mönki et al. [22] demonstrated that the floor material and suspended compounds in dust are significantly linked to the occurrence of equine asthma in horses. Similar results were obtained by Fleming et al. [43] in a study of respirable dust from various floor materials. PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels were highest for litter consisting of hemp and flaxseeds and lowest for straw pellets, wood shavings, paper cuttings, and straw. In the present study, the highest total dust concentration was obtained in the riding halls using sand, sawdust and gravel (RHB and RHC), as confirmed by Wheeler et al. [30]. The authors report that increasing the moisture in the floor material in the riding hall improves air quality.

Mönki et al. [44] found that peat bedding causes fewer cases of respiratory inflammation in horses than wood shavings. An increase in the concentration of pollutants in the air increases inhalation exposure in horses. According to Whittaker et al. [41] the respirable dust fraction in the stable can account for 30% to even 60% of total dust, and the indoor dust concentration increases in winter [11] which is in agreement with the present study.

In the literature on maintenance conditions for horses used for recreation, there are few studies on the problem of the accumulation of inhalation hazards in stables, not only microbiological contaminants, but also chemical contaminants and dust. The synergistic effect of these factors, however, is of great importance in animals such as horses, which have a sensitive respiratory tract. Among the many chemical compounds identified, the respiratory system of horses is most threatened by ammonia, which can synergistically magnify the toxic effect of the high dust concentrations in the air. The other gaseous pollutants identified (trace gases) may enhance this harmful effect. Animal welfare may be additionally harmed by high concentrations of microscopic fungal spores, which are one of the main groups of inhalant allergens. Given the existing threat to the respiratory system of horses, there is a need for monitoring and for measures to improve air quality through the choice of bedding material and hygiene in indoor facilities.

Conclusions

Among the chemical air pollutants identified, ammonia remains the gas of greatest concern. Its concentration is variable and depends on both management and conditions of horse maintenance. The problem of harmful gaseous pollutants may be compounded by an increase in total dust concentrations, exceedances of which have been recorded in both the stable and the C riding arena. According to the study, the age of the facility is an important factor affecting the condition and degree of dust and chemical pollution. Concentrations of bacterial and fungal aerosol obtained the highest values precisely in the oldest facility. The results indicate that it is necessary to modernize the facilities where horses are housed, appropriate selection of the substrate in the dressage halls to avoid respiratory health problems during the use of animals. In addition, when planning the recreational use of horses, it is advisable to control the microclimatic conditions in the premises to maintain the welfare of the horses.

Data availability

Most of the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The rest of data is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fiedorowicz G. The requirements concerning environmental conditions in raising of the horses. Problemy Inżynierii Rolniczej. 2007;4:133–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Łojek J, Łojek A. Breeding and use of horses. Tom 2 SGGW, 2013;25–9.

  3. Fiedorowicz G, Łojek J, Clausen E, Finderup J. Horse maintenance systems. Guide. Denmark: IBMER, Warsaw, DAAS, National Center, Skejby; 2004. pp. 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janczarek I, Stachurska A, Wnuk-Pawlak E, Wiśniewska A, Wilk I, Tkaczyk E, Cikacz K. Influence of air temperature and humidity in the stable on the physiological parameters in horses: preliminary study. Med Weter. 2020;76(12):718–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fiedorowicz G, Łojek J, Clausen E. Modern technologies for keeping horses [part. I]. Przegląd Hodowlany. 2004;72(10):21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seedorf J, Schröder M, Köhler L, Hartung J. Suitability of biocompost as a bedding material for stabled horses: respiratory hygiene and management practicalities. Equine Vet J. 2007;39(2):129–35. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x170085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wålinder R, Riihimäki M, Bohlin S, Hogstedt C, Nordquist T, Raine A, Pringle J, Elfman L. Installation of mechanical ventilation in a horse stable: effects on air quality and human and equine airways. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011;16(4):264–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-010-0195-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riihimäki M, Raine A, Elfman L, Pringle J. Markers of respiratory inflammation in horses in relation to seasonal changes in air quality in a conventional racing stable. Can J Vet Res. 2008;72(5):432–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Riihimäki M, Lilliehöök I, Raine A, Berg M, Pringle J. Clinical alterations and mRNA levels of IL-4 and IL-5 in bronchoalveolar cells of horses with transient pulmonary eosinophilia. Res Vet Sci. 2008;85(1):52–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.09.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kováts N, Horváth E, Jancsek-Turóczi B, Hoffer A, Gelencsér A, Urbán P, Kiss ÍE, Bihari Z, Fekete C. Microbiological characterization of stable resuspended dust. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(3):375–80. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivester KM, Couëtil LL, Zimmerman NJ. Investigating the link between particulate exposure and airway inflammation in the horse. J Vet Intern Med. 2014;28(6):1653–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sikora J. Horse respiratory system diseases. Publisher SI-MA Warsaw 2009;76–86.

  13. Bond S, Léguillette R, Richard EA, Couetil L, Lavoie JP, Martin JG, Pirie RS. Equine asthma: integrative biologic relevance of a recently proposed nomenclature. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32(6):2088–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development on minimum conditions for keeping farm animal species other than those for which protection standards are specified in European Union regulations. (Dz.U. 2019 poz. 1966).

  15. Topczewska J, Rogowska A. Assessment of housing conditions in selected horse stables. Scientific. Yearbooks Pol Zootechnical Soc. 2017;13(4):67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nowakowicz-Dębek B, Pawlak H, Wlazło Ł, Kuna-Broniowska I, Bis-Wencel H, Buczaj A, Maksym P. Evaluation of working conditions of workers engaged in tending horses. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):718–22. https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1129921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gesche C, Engel FH. Particulate matter in Equestrian stables and Riding Arenas. J Equine Veterinary Sci vol. 2017;55:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MAK- und BAT-Werte-Liste 2022 Ständige Senatskommission zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe. Mitteilung 58.

  19. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Ammonia. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence LM, Bicudo JR, Wheeler EF. Horse manure characteristics literature and data base review. In: 9th International Symposium on Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes, Raleigh, NC. 2003;277–284. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.15262.

  21. Watanabe T. Pictorial atlas of soil and seed Fungi. CRS Press LLC; 2002.

  22. Mönki J, Saastamoinen M, Karikoski N, Norring M, Rajamäki M, Mykkänen A. Effects of Bedding Material on equine Lower Airway inflammation: a comparison of two Peat Beddings, Wood Pellet, and Straw Pellet. Front Vet Sci. 2021;17(8):799645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.799645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. White SJ, Moore-Colyer M, Marti E, Hannant D, Gerber V, Coüetil L, Richard EA, Alcocer M. Antigen array for serological diagnosis and novel allergen identification in severe equine asthma. Sci Rep. 2019;23(1):15170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51820-7.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Clauβen G, Hessel E. Particulate matter in equestrian stables and riding arenas. J Equine Vet Sci. 2017;55:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grzyb J, Podstawski Z, Bulski K. Bacterial aerosol, particulate matter, and microclimatic parameters in the horse stables in Poland. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(18):26992–7006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18142-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lühe T, Mielenz N, Schulz J, Dreyer-Rendelsmann C, Kemper N. Factors associated with dust dispersed in the air of indoor riding arenas. Equine Vet J. 2017;49(1):73–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheats MK, Davis KU, Poole JA. Comparative review of Asthma in Farmers and horses. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019;19(11):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-019-0882-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Elfman L, Wålinder R, Riihimäki M, Pringle J. Air Qual Horse Stables InTech. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/18228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Authority SWE. Occupational exposure limit values and measures against air contaminants. Swedish Work Environmental Authority; 2005.

  30. Wheeler E, Diehl N, Zajaczkowski J, Brown D. Horse riding arena dust measurements. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium. Beijing, China. ASAE. St. Joseph, MI. 2005;171–178. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.18362.

  31. Dauvillier J, Ter Woort F, van Erck-Westergren E. Fungi in respiratory samples of horses with inflammatory airway disease. J Vet Intern Med. 2019;33(2):968–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Andersen B, Hollensted M. Metabolite production by different Ulocladium species. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;126(1–2):172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pośniak M, Skowroń J. Harmful factors in the work environment. Limit values 2022. ISBN: 978-83-7373-346-6.

  34. Act of 21. August 1997 on animal protection. (Dz.U. 1997 nr 111 poz. 724).

  35. Saastamoinen M, Särkijärvi S, Suomala H. Correction: Saastamoinen et al. Protein source and Intake effects on Diet Digestibility and N Excretion in Horses-A risk of environmental N load of horses. Animals. 2021;11(3568). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070848.

  36. Bis-Wencel H, Rowicka A, Kubik-Komar A, Krukowski H, Nowakowicz-Dębek B, Wlazło Ł. Effect of defined, seasonally variable exercise on oxidative status markers (TOS, TAS) in jumping horses. Med Weter. 2020;76(7):394–9. https://doi.org/10.21521/mw.6381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Araneda OF, Cavada G. Atmospheric Pollutants Affect Physical Performance: A Natural Experiment in Horse Racing Studied by Principal Component Analysis. Biology (Basel). 2022; 30;11(5):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050687.

  38. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;45(7):1170–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mills PC, Marlin DJ, Demoncheaux E, Scott C, Casas I, Smith NC, Higenbottam T. Nitric oxide and exercise in the horse. J Physiol. 1996;15:495:863–74. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Araneda OF. Horse Racing as a model to study the relationship between Air pollutants and physical performance. Anim (Basel). 2022;28(9):1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Whittaker AG, Hughes KJ, Parkin TDH, Love S. Concentrations of dust and endotoxin in equine stabling. Vet Rec. 2009;165(10):293–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alvarado T.D, Elghandour M.M, Ekanem, N.J, Alcala-Canto Y, Velázquez A.E, Pacheco E.B.F, … Salem A.Z. Influence of Azadirachta Indica and Cnidoscolus Angustidens dietary extracts on equine fecal greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science,2022;116, 104049. doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104049.

  43. Fleming K, Hessel EF, Weghe HV. Generation of Airborne particles from different bedding materials used for horse keeping. J Equine Veterinary Sci. 2008;28:408–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2008.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mönki J, Saastamoinen M, Karikoski N, Rajamäki M, Raekallio M, Junnila J, Särkijärvi S, Norring M, Valros A, Oranen Ben Fatma S, Mykkänen A. Effects of Bedding Material on equine Lower Airway inflammation: a crossover study comparing Peat and Wood Shavings. Front Vet Sci 202;9;8:656814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.656814.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, Lublin, 20-950, Poland

    Izabela Rodzyń, Katarzyna Karpińska, Hanna Bis-Wencel, Łukasz Wlazło, Mateusz Ossowski & Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek

  2. Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20‑950, Lublin, Poland

    Katarzyna Strzelec

  3. Student Scientific Association of Occupational and Environmental Hazards, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Science in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20‑950, Lublin, Poland

    Sebastian Jaguszewski

Authors
  1. Izabela Rodzyń
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katarzyna Karpińska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanna Bis-Wencel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Łukasz Wlazło
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mateusz Ossowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Katarzyna Strzelec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sebastian Jaguszewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, B.N.D; Ł.W.; IR.; KK; methodology, Ł.W., B.N.D.; formal analysis, Ł.W., H.B-W.; investigation, B.N.D.; W.Ł.; H.B-W.; S.J.; M.O.; data curation, B.N.D; Ł.W.; writing-original draft preparation, B.N.D; Ł.W.; I.R. and K.K; writing-review and editing, B.N.D; Ł.W.; H.B.W; K.K.; I.R.; KS.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Karpińska.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodzyń, I., Karpińska, K., Bis-Wencel, H. et al. Exposure to chemical pollutants and biological aerosol in indoor facilities for recreational and sport horses. BMC Vet Res 20, 78 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-03930-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-03930-2

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us