Skip to main content
Download PDF

Chitosan coating silver nanoparticles as a promising feed additive in broilers chicken

BMC Veterinary Research volume 19, Article number: 265 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of chitosan coating silver nanoparticles to enhance the growth performance and immune status of broilers without inducing oxidative stress-related pathological lesions in any organs or leaving residues of silver in the edible parts. Five clusters of Cobb one-day-old chicks (n = 10/group in each replication) were given oral therapy, once a week for 36 days as follows: (1) distilled water, (2, 3) 0.5- and 5 ppm silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), respectively, (4, 5) 0.5- and 5 ppm chitosan/silver nanoconjugates (CS/Ag-NCs), respectively. The results demonstrated a marked elevation in the body weight gain with a decline in the food conversion ratio and marked improvement in feeding and drinking behavior of all nanoparticles treated groups, but higher in CS/Ag-NCs groups than AgNPs groups and control group. In contrast to the 0.5 ppm AgNPs receiving group, the group receiving 5 ppm AgNPs noticed remarkable histological changes in some organs, including the liver, kidneys, spleen, and heart. Moreover, the administration of CS/Ag-NCs at two dosage levels didn’t influence any histological changes. The AgNPs groups’ antibody titers against the ND and AI viruses were almost identical to those of the control group. Otherwise, CS/Ag-NCs groups recorded the highest antibody titers. Additionally, there was a significant increase in silver content in most edible organs of AgNPs groups at a dosage level of 5 ppm. Otherwise, the coating of AgNPs by CSNPs could decrease the aggregation of silver in the biological organs. Thus, we recommend utilizing 0.5 ppm CS/Ag-NCs in broiler farms to promote their growth performance and strengthen their immune defense.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The intensive use of sub-therapeutic antibiotic dosage as a feed additive has been shown to improve feed efficiency and growth performance in poultry. However, this practice contributes to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [1]. As a result, there is an increasing interest in the animal feed sector in looking at alternatives to antibiotic feed additives. Among the antibiotic alternatives that could be used are essential oils, probiotics, and prebiotics [2,3,4]. Additionally, metal nanoparticles such as zinc [5], copper [6], gold [7, 8], and silver [9, 10] are examples of potential antibiotic substitutes. Studies have suggested that feeding of mineral nanoparticles improved digestive efficiency, immunity, and performance in livestock and poultry [11].

Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NP) have a lot of interest because of their broad-spectrum antimicrobial capabilities [12], so they are used in a lot of biological and medical disciplines [13, 14]. They have higher antibacterial activity than other metals, such as mercury, copper, lead, and chromium [15]. Nevertheless, silver ion (Ag+) is cytotoxic [16], its use as a feed additive necessitates chelation, which involves converting the positive charge (Ag+) to a non-charge (Ag0) molecule. Several Ag-NPs-based composites have shown improved performance due to nanoparticle stabilization and support [17].

Chitosan-silver nanoparticles (CS/Ag-NPs) as silver-based nanocomposites represent an emerging group of bio-nanostructured hybrid materials owing to their biocompatibility and biodegradability [18]. Chitosan is a biopolymer made from the chitin found in shellfish exoskeletons [19]. It exhibits antibacterial and antifungal properties [20, 21], as well as excellent metal chelator potential [22]. Chitosan is a non-toxic material that is safe for humans, animals, and the environment. In the poultry field, chitosan can be used as a feed supplement [23]. Coating AgNPs with polymers as CSNPs significantly increases their antimicrobial efficacy and makes them used in food packaging, as it increases the shelf life of food products [24]. For the previous reasons, this study was conducted to figure out the role of Chitosan-silver nanoparticles as a feed additive in broiler chickens by measuring its impact on broiler performance, immune status, microscopic picture of muscles, and different organs. Additionally, the safety assessments of these nanoparticles were evaluated by measuring the content of silver in different musculature and edible parts.

Materials and methods

Preparation of silver nanoparticles

According to the procedure outlined by Moghaddam et al. [25], the colloidal solution of AgNPs at a concentration of 500 ppm was created by the co-precipitation method by the reduction of silver nitrate (AgNO3) (99.99%, Aldrich, US) with Sodium borohydride (99%, Aldrich, US).

Preparation of Chitosan-silver nanocomposites

Chitosan-silver nanocomposites (CS/Ag NCs) were synthesized through chitosan reduction of silver nitrate in accordance with Babu et al. [26].

Characterization of the prepared nanoparticles

A double-beam UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Agilent, UK) operating in the scanning range of 300–800 nm was used to record the characteristic SPR of AgNPs using absorption spectroscopy. To evaluate the morphology of the produced NPs, a transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with a Tecnai G2 200 kV accelerating voltage (FEI, Netherlands) was employed. Using a Malvern, ZS Nano, U.K. zeta sizer, the average particle size distribution curve and zeta potential of both NPs were ascertained using the dynamic light scattering (DLS) approach. An X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’Pert Pro, Analytical, Netherlands) approach was used to analyze the crystalline and phase structure of the produced nanoparticles.

Animals and experimental study

All sections in the current study adhered to the ARRIVE guidelines for the in vivo animal experiments (PLoS Bio 8(6), e1000412,2010​) and reported in the ARRIVE checklist. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Cairo University (IACUC, approval number: Vet CU 03162023669), Cairo, Egypt, approved all procedures, which were conducted in accordance with the laboratory animal care and use guidelines (8th edition, 2011).

A local hatchery (El-Hwamdya, Giza, Egypt) provided a total of one hundred one-day-old Cobb broilers chicks of both sexes. The chicks were weighed and randomly divided into five groups, each of which contained two replicates of ten birds in each (n = 10) based on the data obtained from the sample size calculation formula, whereas the single bird is considered as the experimental unit. They were raised in a deep-litter system with straw bedding, and the house was kept at standard humidity, ventilation, and temperature levels throughout the experiment. It also had a 24-hour constant-light schedule. The birds were provided unrestricted access to water and a balanced meal (including starting and growth diets) that was suitable for their maturation stage. Additionally, the birds received vaccinations against ND (live Newcastle) and IBV (Hitchner IB) through the ocular route on the seventh day of age, SC administered the H5N1 (avian influenza reassorting inactivated vaccine) on the tenth day of age, and IBD (virus strain winter field) through the ocular route on the twelfth day of age.

The birds in each replication were randomly separated into five groups (n = 10/group) using a block randomization strategy. Group 1 served as the control group, receiving sterile normal saline orally once a week for 36 days. Groups (2) and (3) received 0.5 and 5 ppm of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), respectively. Chitosan/silver nanoconjugates (CS/Ag NCs) were administered in concentrations of 0.5 and 5 ppm to Groups 4 and 5, respectively. Starting from 7 days, all chicks were orally administered the nanoparticles using a stomach tube, once a week for 36 days. AgNPs dosages were chosen in accordance with the results of the prior study [11], and the same doses were used for CS/Ag NCs since broiler chickens lack a reference dose for CS/Ag NCs. The experimenters were blinded to the therapy while processing data and making exclusion decisions. Throughout the experimental period, no adverse events were reported and therefore, we didn’t exclude any birds.

Behavioral parameters

Following the acclimation period (7 days), each bird was observed for a total of 15 min by instantaneous scan sampling three days per week, twice per day, and the behaviors were measured as a percentage of the entire number of birds seen throughout an instantaneous scan sample [27, 28]. Feeding, drinking, leg, and wing stretching, and preening behaviors were all recorded.

Growth performance assessments

The body weight and feed intake of 10 birds (5 from each replication) were measured weekly in each group in a blinded manner. Furthermore, the feed conversion ratio (FCR), was calculated according to Timmerman et al., as the ratio of feed intake to weight gain for each bird/week [29].

Sampling

Weekly blood samples were taken from the wing vein of ten chicks (five chicks per replication) that were selected by an investigator who was unaware of the treatment groups. The collected blood samples were centrifuged for five minutes at 4500 rpm to obtain clear serum samples and then stored at -20 °C until required for biochemical measurements (hemagglutination inhibition test and oxidative stress evaluation). To get samples from the skeletal muscles and other organs, including the liver, kidneys, heart, spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius, all birds were euthanized by the exsanguination at the end of the experiment by cutting their throat and allowing them to bleed out. For histopathological analysis, 10% neutral buffered formalin was used to fix the collected tissue samples.

Hemagglutination inhibition test

The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was used to measure the anti-ND and anti-AI vaccination antibody titers in serum samples at 8, 15, and 22 days old to assess the impact of both NPs at two dosage levels on the humeral immunity. It was done on 10 birds per group (5 birds from each replication). Erythrocytes are added after the virus is treated with diluted serum. The maximum dilution of serum that suppresses hemagglutination is determined by the HI titer following incubation [30].

Oxidative stress evaluation

At the end of the experiment, lipid peroxidation was evaluated by measuring the serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) following the method described by Ohkawa et al., [31]. Additionally, catalase (CAT) activity and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were measured following the method reported by Aebi, [32], using commercial kits (Biodiagnostic Co., Cairo, Egypt).

Histopathological examination

The formalin-fixed tissue samples were extracted using standard procedures, including an ascending alcohol grade for dehydration and xylene for clearing. Then, the formalin-fixed tissue samples were cut into 4-micron slices using an ordinary microtome and placed on slides for histopathological analyses using the H&E stain [33].

Following the procedures outlined by Hassanen et al., [9], the severity of the evident microscopic lesions was evaluated using the traditional semiquantitative multiparametric grading methodology. Seven microscopic fields per slide in a total of 10 slides per group were graded by a pathologist who was unaware of the treatment groups to avoid bias. The diffuse lesion was blindly evaluated and graded on a 5-point scale as mild, moderate, severe, and extensive severe changes as follows: (1) Mild 25%, (2) Moderate 25–50%, (3) Severe 50–75%, and (4) Extensive Severe > 75% tissue damage are all possible outcomes. Meanwhile, the focal lesions were graded as follows: according to the approach of Hassanen et al., [34], (0) no foci, (1) 3 foci, (2) 3–6 foci, (3) 7–12 foci, and (4) > 12 foci/field at low magnification power.

Assessment of the silver content in the muscle and some vital organs

The amount of silver in muscle and some edible organs like the heart, liver, and spleen tissue was measured using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ZEISS, AAS5, and Germany). Briefly, 0.5 g tissue samples were treated with strong nitric acid and 30% H2O2 overnight, then cooked in a microwave digestion system (ETHOS One; Milestone, Sorisole, Italy) until it was totally digested and colorless. The remaining solutions were then diluted with 2% nitric acid after the samples had had time to cool [35].

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Duncan’s test was performed to compare the nanoparticle’s treatment groups versus the control group. Whereas the non-parametric values as the histological lesion scoring were expressed as median and were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis H test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Characterization of the prepared nanoparticles

The results of the physicochemical characterization of the prepared nanoparticles were illustrated in supplementary materials (Fig. S1, S2). UV-spectroscopy showed the characteristic Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) absorption peak at 404 nm with a Gaussian distribution curve for the prepared AgNPs. TEM electrographs showed spherical-shaped particles with a size range of 17 ± 4 nm for both AgNPs and CS/Ag NCs. DLS showed an average particle size of 17 nm with an excellent polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.392 for AgNPs and 20 nm for CS/Ag NCs as well as zeta potential 66 mV for CS/Ag NCs. XRD analysis based on low Bragg’s reflections was used to examine the phase formation of silver nanoparticles. Typical diffraction pattern with distinct peaks at 38.14°, 44.41°, 64.61°, and 77.74° 2 angles, respectively, corresponding to the hill parameters of (111), (200), (220), and (311). The generated diffraction pattern was compared with the installed PDF4 software’s default ICCD library, card number: (04-003-5625). Moreover, chitosan and silver were present in the synthesized CS-Ag NCs, although there were no impurity phases, according to the XRD pattern. Chitosan peak appeared at 2 values of the broad peak between 15 and 35 degrees. The face-centered cubic structure was used to index the silver peak locations, and this structure agrees well with the JCPDS card No.04-004-8730. The three silver peaks that were discovered correspond to the reflections (111), (220), and (311), respectively. The position and relative intensity of all the diffraction peaks of the samples were consistent with the crystalline pattern of silver, proving that the produced nanoparticles were in fact silver nanoparticles.

The growth performance

A significant increase in body weight gain and a decrease in the food conversion ratio were observed in all nanoparticle-treated birds compared with the control one. Birds given either 0.5- or 5 ppm CS/Ag NCs showed marked improvement in BWG and FCR compared with those receiving AgNPs (Table 1).

Table 1 The effect of AgNPs and CS/Ag NCs on chicken body weight and FCR
Full size table

Behavioral assessment

The behavioral results in Table 2 show a significant increase in feeding and drinking behaviors in the group receiving 0.5- or 5 ppm CS/Ag NCs compared with the broiler in other groups. Furthermore, the percentages of leg and wing stretch, as well as preening, were higher in birds fed with CS/Ag NCs either at 0.5- or 5 ppm when compared to those fed with AgNPs and control groups.

Table 2 The effect of AgNPs and CS/Ag NCs on some behavioral parameters
Full size table

The antibody titers against ND and AI virus

Compared with the control group, all AgNPs treated birds didn’t exhibit any significant difference in the antibody titers against ND and AI virus. Otherwise, the group receiving CS/Ag NCs either at 0.5- or 5 ppm showed a significant increase in the antibody titers against ND and AI virus compared with other groups, and the highest level recorded in the group receiving 5 ppm CS/Ag NCs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of the nanoparticles on the antibody titers against ND and AI virus in broiler chicken. Values represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 birds/group). Different superscript letters (a-c) mean significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Full size image

Oxidative stress evaluations

A significant increase in MDA levels and decrease in TAC and CAT activity were observed in birds that were given 5 ppm AgNPs followed by those receiving 0.5 ppm AgNPs compared with the control group. Otherwise, the group receiving 0.5- or 5 ppm CS/Ag NCs showed marked improvement in the parameters in contrast to other groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of the nanoparticles on some oxidative stress biomarkers in the serum of broiler chicken. Values represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 birds/group). Different superscript letters (a-c) mean significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Full size image

Microscopical findings of different organs

Skeletal and cardiac muscle sections as well as kidney tissues from the control group displayed typical histological architecture (Fig. 3a-c). Likewise, the group receiving 0.5 ppm AgNPs exhibits normal histological organization (Fig. 3d-f). Otherwise, the group receiving 5 ppm AgNPs demonstrated moderate to severe histological changes. Both skeletal and cardiac muscles showed moderate cytoplasmic vacuolization of some myocytes (Fig. 3g, h). Some sections showed inflammatory cells infiltration between muscle bundles. Kidney sections displayed moderate tubular epithelial degeneration and necrosis along with vascular congestion (Fig. 3i). Furthermore, those obtained from CS/Ag NCs showed normal histological structures (Fig. 3j-o).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photomicrograph of skeletal and cardiac muscles and kidney tissue sections stained with H&E representing different treatment groups. (a-c) Control group showed normal histological structure. (d-f) Group receiving 0.5 mg AgNPs showed normal histological structure. (g-i) Group receiving 5 mg AgNPs displayed moderate cellular degeneration and necrosis (arrows) along with splitting of myofibrils (triangles). (j-l) and (m-o) Groups receiving 0.5- and 5 mg CS/Ag NCs, respectively, exhibit normal histological organization. Images with scale bar 100 μm were captured at magnification power 10x, whereas images with scale bar 50 μm were captured at magnification power 20x

Full size image

Regarding immune organs, the control group showed normal histology of the liver, thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius (Fig. 4a-d). Additionally, those obtained from birds receiving 0.5 mg AgNPs displayed a normal microscopic appearance, too (Fig. 4e-h). Otherwise, birds receiving 5 mg AgNPs noticed severe portal and centrilobular infiltration of mononuclear inflammatory cells along with random hepatocellular vacuolation and necrosis in most liver sections (Fig. 4i). Thymus showed a decrease in the cortical layer width with focal necrotic area (Fig. 4j). Lymphoid follicles of both splenic white pulp and bursal tissue exhibit extensive lymphoid depletion and lymphocytolysis associated with enormous number of tangible-like macrophages (Fig. 4k, l). Moreover, administration of CS/Ag NCs at two dosage levels didn’t influence any histological changes in the immune organs (Fig. 4m-t).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Photomicrograph of tissue sections obtained from different immune organs that stained with H&E representing different treatment groups. (a-c) Control group showed normal histological structure. (d-f) Group receiving 0.5 mg AgNPs showed normal histological structure. (g-i) Group receiving 5 mg AgNPs displayed moderate to severe histological alterations including, cellular vacuolation and necrosis (arrows), inflammatory cells infiltration (star), focal lymphocytolysis (circles), lymphocytic cell depletion (triangles). (j-l) and (m-o) Groups receiving 0.5- and 5 mg CS/Ag NCs, respectively, exhibit normal histological organization. Images with scale bar 100 μm were captured at magnification power 10x, whereas images with scale bar 50 μm were captured at magnification power 20x

Full size image

Table 3 summarizes the microscopic lesion scoring in all the examined organs. The highest scores of all histopathological parameters were observed in the group given 5 mg AgNPs followed by those receiving 0.5 mg. Meanwhile, the groups’ given CS/Ag NCs either at dosage levels 0.5- or 5 mg didn’t record any significant difference compared with the control group, except for moderate muscular degeneration observed in the 5 mg CS/Ag NCs receiving group.

Table 3 Microscopic lesion scoring in different examined organs
Full size table

Silver content in the muscle and some edible organs

A significant elevation in silver concentration of the liver was recorded in groups receiving AgNPs at both doses, whereas the group receiving 5 mg AgNPs only displayed a significant elevation of silver contents in broilers’ musculatures compared with those receiving 0.5 mg. However, the silver concentrations of the muscle, liver, spleen, and heart did not significantly differ between the groups receiving CS/Ag NCs and the control group (Table 4).

Table 4 Silver contents (ppp) in muscle and edible organs
Full size table

Discussion

Nanotechnology is a promising as well as emerging technology that will have an essential role in poultry and animal nutrition in the future [36]. Nanoparticles have a variety of benefits, including the ability to enter the cells faster through the stomach’s wall than bigger particle sizes. In addition, nano-additives may be added to natural feed ingredients like protein capsules, micelles, and other components [9]. There are various kinds of nanoparticles particularly AgNPs usually viewed as antimicrobial agents [37]. However, the use of chitosan coating silver nanoparticles as growth promoter potential is not well studied in the broilers, hence our research was intended to evaluate and compare the potential impacts of two different doses of AgNPs and CS/Ag-NCs on the growth performance, oxidative stress damage, immunological indices, and histopathological organizations in different organs of the broilers.

The results of the current research showed that the oral supplementation of chicken with 0.5 and 5 ppm CS/Ag-NCs once a week for 36 days significantly increased the body weight gain (BWG) and decreased the food conversion ratio (FCR) throughout the entire experiment, whereas a group of birds that were treated with 0.5 and 5 ppm AgNPs showed slight improvements in body weight gain and food conversion ratio compared to the control group. The findings of our study could be attributed to the biological actions of chitosan and silver on intestinal pathogenic bacteria, which also caused enhanced development and growth as nutrient absorption was elevated [38]. Moreover, nanoparticles could improve intestinal mineral uptake and consumption, by increasing their surface area, which would enhance growth performance [39].

Our findings also revealed that CS/Ag NCs markedly improved both physical and psychological broilers welfare which are consistent with previously mentioned findings, CS/Ag-NCs improved body weight gain and food conversion ratio. Feeding, drinking, scratching, foraging, perching, resting, and comforting behavior patterns are among the crucial behavioral parameters that determine broiler welfare [40]. Interestingly, the current findings revealed that the CS/Ag-NCs significantly enhanced feeding activity more than those of the control group, whereas AgNPs supplementation slightly enhanced broiler feeding and drinking behavior. Our findings were in context to Ayman et al., [40] who reported that the supplementation of chitosan to broiler food enhanced feeding activity and body weight gain which was attributed to its bactericidal and immunostimulant activities. Regarding AgNPs, some studies revealed the potential of AgNPs to improve both the feeding and drinking behavior of broilers [41, 42], while others showed that AgNPs didn’t affect feeding and drinking [43]. These variations may be related to many factors, including NPs size and concentration, routes of administration, and duration of exposure. In terms of broiler comfort and body care behavior, several studies have demonstrated that comfort activity, including preening, wing, and leg stretching, wing flapping, and body shaking, is crucial for feather care and body maintenance [44]. Preening regulates lipid levels in the feathers and maintains the viability of the chicken’s skin and plumage [40]. Broilers fed with CS/Ag-NCs displayed a significantly increased activity in preening and stretching of the wings and legs compared to the AgNPs and control groups.

A recent study indicated that CS/Ag-NCs can improve the intestinal absorption of minerals and nutrients and animal health [45]. In our study, the histopathological analysis of the examined organs revealed normal histology in the 0.5- and 5 ppm CS/Ag-NCs received groups, confirming that the broiler was in good health. On the other hand, all the examined organs displayed severe histopathological alterations in the 5 ppm AgNPs group. In this group, the lymphoid follicles of the spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius revealed significant lymphocytolysis and lymphoid cell deficiency. Our results suggest that 5 ppm AgNPs may have an immunosuppressive effect on broiler chickens related to T- and B-lymphocyte depletion. In addition, our findings revealed a significant drop in antibody levels against Newcastle disease (ND) and avian influenza (AI) in the 5 ppm AgNPs group. The phagocyte and lymphocyte are well known to be the principal barriers to nanoparticle invasion of animal cells and tissues. Consequently, it is undoubtedly of great interest to study how AgNPs interact with phagocytic cells, their intracellular absorption, as well as immune cell responses to them. Ognik et al. found that orally administered AgNPs with varying sizes enhanced phagocytosis and leukocyte metabolic activity which may be signs of an inflammatory condition evolving in the organism [46].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction induced oxidative stress, rendering cells incapable of performing normal physiological activities [47]. Cellular activity disorders entail lipid peroxidation, modulation of inflammatory processes via signal transduction, as well as modulation of gene expression via transcriptional regulator activation, all of which can have cell death and immunotoxic effects [48,49,50]. There are numerous oxidative stress indicators, including ROS themselves, which reflect the level of ROS overproduction. However, ROS has a short half-life but is highly reactive. Due to this, evaluating the oxidation target products of oxidative stress, such as lipid peroxidation, oxidative nucleic acid damage, and oxidized proteins is more applicable [51]. In the present research, the group that administered 5 ppm AgNPs had significantly higher blood levels of MDA, a lipid peroxidation byproduct, and significantly reduced CAT and TAC activity, which are antioxidants, those that indicated oxidative stress damage. Since membrane phospholipids are important targets of oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation is the primary parameter evaluated to indicate the presence of free radical damage. Peroxidation of lipids results in a progressive deterioration of cell membrane integrity, disturbance of cellular ion homeostasis, as well as dysfunctional membrane transport [52]. The elevated MDA levels and lowered CAT activities after AgNPs exposure in our work were consistent with Sreelekha et al., who found a marked rise in MDA levels and significantly decreased CAT levels in broiler chicken intestinal mucosa after 42 d of AgNPs exposure [53].

Comparing the group of birds treated with AgNPs to those treated with CS/Ag-NCs, the current study found a significantly higher level of silver in both the liver and spleen of the treated group of birds. Our research suggests that the AgNPs accumulation in broiler chicken livers may be transferred to consumers, causing a range of undesirable adverse effects. These findings are consistent with much previous research that found that broiler chickens’ livers retained Ag significantly more than other organs [54, 55]. Chitosan nanoparticles also serve as a capped site for nanoparticle stability because they have a certain functional group (amino compounds) that binds with Ag ions [56]. Additionally, CS/NCs function as a binding agent for AgNPs by creating a network on the surface of NPs, which enables uniform AgNPs distribution upon the surfaces without any discernible aggregation consequences [57]. Our study provides insights into the ability of CS/Ag NCs to enhance the growth performance and immune status of broiler chickens, however, further studies are required to confirm these insights on other species including layer chickens, pigeons, rabbits, and others.

Conclusion

Based on our data, we conclude that the oral intake of either 0.5- or 5 ppm CS/Ag-NCs weekly to broiler chickens was beneficial in improving their growth performance, welfare index, and immunological status, which neither left toxic residues in muscles and edible organs nor damaging the histological organizations of their internal organs. However, broiler chickens exposed to 5 ppm AgNPs exhibited severe cytotoxicity as evidenced by changes in oxidant/antioxidant parameters, and histological structures. Consequently, we recommend utilizing 0.5 ppm CS/Ag NCs as feed additives in broiler farms to promote their growth performance and strengthen their immune defense without leaving any residues in the muscle and edible parts of broiler chicken.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Doriane YMD, Raphaël KJ, Augustave K, Lavoisier FT, Ruben NT, Narcisse VB, Alexis T, Amir M. Chelating effect of silver nitrate by chitosan on its toxicity and growth performance in broiler chickens. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 2017;4(2), 187–193. Retrieved from https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/JAVAR/article/view/33117

  2. Dieumou FE, Teguia A, Kuiate JR, Tamokou JD, Fonge NB, Dongmo MC. Effects of ginger (Zingiber officinal) and garlic (Allium sativum) essential oils on growth performance and gut microbial population of broiler chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2009;21(8): 23–32. http://www.Irrd.org/Irrd21/8/dieu21131.htm.

  3. Krishan G, Narang A. Use of essential oils in poultry nutrition: a new approach. J Adv Veterinary Anim Res. 2014;1(4):156–62. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2014.a36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmenawey MA, Mohammed FA, Morsy EA, Abdel-Alim GA, Awaad MHH. The impact of essential oils blend on experimental colisepticemia in broiler chickens. Int J Veterinary Sci. 2019;8(4):294–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mohamed S, Salah E, Saudi MA, Morsy EA, Ahmed S, Amin A. In Vitro evaluation of Antibacterial properties of Zinc Oxide nanoparticles alone and in combination with antibiotics against Avian Pathogenic E. Coli. J World Poult Res. 2020;10(2S):278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morsy EA, Hussien AM, Ibrahim MA, Farroh KY, Hassanen EI. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in chickens. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199(12):4731–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02595-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei DW, Qian WP, Shi Y, Ding SH, Xia Y. Mass synthesis of single-crystal gold nanosheets on chitosan. Carbohydr Res. 2007;342:2494–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2007.07.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassanen EI, Morsy EA, Hussien AM, Ibrahim MA, Farroh KY. ; The effect of different concentrations of gold nanoparticles on growth performance, toxicopathological and immunological parameters of broiler chickens. Biosci Rep 27 March 2020; 40 (3): BSR20194296. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20194296

  9. Dongwei W, Wuyong S, Weiping Q, Yongzhong Y, Xiaoyuan M. The synthesis of Chitosan-based silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Carbohydr Res. 2009;344:2375–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2009.09.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassanen EI, Morsy EA, Hussien AM, Farroh KY, Ali ME. Comparative assessment of the bactericidal effect of nanoparticles of copper oxide, silver, and chitosan-silver against Escherichia coli infection in broilers. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(4): BSR20204091. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20204091

  11. Marappan G, Beulah P, Kumar RD, Muthuvel S, Govindasamy P. Role of nanoparticles in animal and poultry nutrition: modes of action and applications in formulating feed additives and food processing. Int J Pharmacol. 2017;13(7):724–31. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2017.724.731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Awaad MHH, Moustafa KE, Zoulfakar SA, Elhalawany MS, Mohammed FF, El-Refay RM, Morsy EA. The role of silver nanoparticles in the reluctance of colisepticemia in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2021;30(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100155

  13. Kraśniewska K, Galus S, Gniewosz M. Biopolymers-based materials containing silver nanoparticles as active packaging for food applications–a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Salata O. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnol. 2004;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-2-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen S, Wu G, Zeng H. Preparation of high antimicrobial activity thiourea chitosan–Ag + complex. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;60(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.11.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cha K, Hong HW, Choi YG, Lee MJ, Park JH, Chae HK, Ryu G, Myung H. Comparison of acute response of mice livers to short-term exposure to nano-sized or micro sized silver particles. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(11):1893–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9786-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly FM, Johnston JH. Colored and functional silver nanoparticle-wool fiber composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011;3(4):1083–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/am101224v

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassanen EI, Khalaf AA, Tohamy AF, Mohammed ER, Farroh KY. Toxicopathological and immunological studies on different concentrations of chitosan-coated silver nanoparticles in rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:4723–39. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S207644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(7):603–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP. Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility, and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34(7):641–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Avila-Sosa R, Palou E, Munguía MTJ, Nevárez-Moorillón GV, Cruz ARN, López-Malo A. Antifungal activity by vapor contact of essential oils added to Amaranth, Chitosan, or starch edible films. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153(1–2):66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chi S, Zivanovic S, Penfield MP. Application of chitosan films enriched with oregano essential oil on Bologna-active compounds and sensory attributes. Food Sci Technol Int. 2006;12(2):111–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013206063845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hassanen EI, Ragab E. Vivo and in Vitro assessments of the Antibacterial potential of Chitosan-Silver Nanocomposite against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus–Induced Infection in rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020;199:244–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02143-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khambualai O, Yamauchi K, Tangtaweewipat S, Cheva-Isarakul B. Effects of Dietary Chitosan diets on Growth performance in broiler chickens. J Poult Sci. 2008;45(3):206–9. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.45.206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moghaddam AB, Nazari T, Badraghi J, Kazemzad M. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and electrodeposition of polypyrene/ZnO nanocomposite film. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2009;4(2):247–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Babu B, Nair RS, Angelo JM, Mathai V, Vineet RV. Evaluation of the efficacy of chitosan-silver nanocomposite on Candida albicans when compared to three different antifungal agents in combination with standard irrigation protocol: an ex vivo study. Saudi Endod J. 2017;7:87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Helle HK, Neville BP, Graham CP, Jan L, Annette KE, Katja CO, Christopher MW. The behavior of broiler chickens in different light sources and illuminances. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007;103:75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hany E, Kassem I, Fatma W. Improving broiler productive performance and reducing environmental pollution by manipulating feed consumption. Bioscience Res. 2019;16:1104–12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Timmerman HM, Veldman A, van den Elsen E, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC. Mortality and Growth Performance of Broilers Given drinking Water supplemented with Chicken-Specific Probiotics. Poult Sci. 2006;85:1383–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.8.1383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Swayne DE, Glisson JR, Jackwood MW, Pearson JE, Reed WM. A Laboratory Manual for the isolation and identification of avian pathogens. 4th ed. Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.: American Association of Avian Pathologists. Inc.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by Thio barbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95:351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Suvarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft JD. (2019). Theory and practice of histological techniques, 8th edition. UK: Elsevier Health Sci.

  34. Hassanen EI, Korany RM, Bakeer AM. Cisplatin-conjugated gold nanoparticles‐based drug delivery system for targeting hepatic tumors. J Biochem Mol Toxicol, 2021;35(5), e22722.

  35. Recordati C, De Maglie M, Bianchessi S, Argentiere S, Cella C, Mattiello S, Cubadda F, Aureli F, D’Amato M, Raggi A, Lenardi C, Milani P, Scanziani E. Tissue distribution and acute toxicity of silver after single intravenous administration in mice: nano-specific and size-dependent effects. Part fiber Toxicol. 2016;13:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0124-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanini A, Schmitt A, Kacem K, Chau F, Ammar S, Gavard J. Evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticle biocompatibility. Int J Nanomed. 2011;6:787–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen WY, Lin JY, Chen WJ, Luo L, Wei-Guang Diau E, Chen YC. Functional gold nanoclusters as antimicrobial agents for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:755–64. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.10.43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Das CA, Kumar VG, Dhas TS, Karthick V, Govindaraju K, Joselin JM, Baalamurugan J. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles (biosynthesis): a short review on recent advances. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;27:101593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hill EK, Li J. Current and future prospects for nanotechnology in animal production. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0157-5. 8,26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lourenço da Silva, MI, Almeida Paz, ICDL, Chaves, GHC, Almeida, ICDL, Ouros, CCD, Souza, SRLD, … & Glavina, ASG. Behavior and animal welfare indicators of broiler chickens housed in an enriched environment. PLoS one, 2021;16(9):e0256963.

  41. Kumar I, Bhattacharya J. Assessment of the role of silver nanoparticles in reducing poultry mortality, risk and economic benefits. Appl Nanosci. 2019;9(6):1293–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kumar I, Bhattacharya J, Das BK, Lahiri P. Growth, serum biochemical, and histopathological responses of broilers administered with silver nanoparticles as a drinking water disinfectant. Biotech. 2020;10:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fouda MM, Dosoky WM, Radwan NS, Abdelsalam NR, Taha AE, Khafaga AF. Oral administration of silver nanoparticles–adorned starch as a growth promotor in poultry: immunological and histopathological study. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:830–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kamel MM, Elhady M, Iraqi E, K. G., Wahba F. Biological immune stimulants effects on immune response, behavioral and productive performance of broilers. Egypt Poult Sci J, 2015;35(3).

  45. Pineda L, Chwalibog A, Sawosz E, Lauridsen C, Engberg R, Elnif J, et al. Effect of silver nanoparticles on growth performance, metabolism, and microbial profile of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr. 2012;66:416–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ognik K, Cholewińska E, Czech A, Kozłowski K, Nowakowicz-Dębek B, Szlązak R, Tutaj K. Effect of silver nanoparticles on the immune, redox, and lipid status of chicken blood. Czech J Anim Sci. 2016;61(10):450–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hassanen EI, Abdelrahman RE, Aboul-Ella H, et al. Mechanistic Approach on the pulmonary oxido-inflammatory stress Induced by Cobalt Ferrite nanoparticles in rats. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-03700-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Abdelrahman RE, Khalaf A, Elhady MA, Ibrahim MA, Hassanen EI, Noshy PA. Antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects of quercetin against ochratoxin A-induced nephrotoxicity in broiler chickens. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology,2022;96, 103982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2022.103982

  49. Mo E, Ebedy YA, Ibrahim MA, Farroh KY, Hassanen EI. Newly synthesized chitosan-nanoparticles attenuate carbendazim hepatorenal toxicity in rats via activation of Nrf2/HO1 signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9986. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13960-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fu PP, Xia Q, Sun X, et al. Phototoxicity and environmental transformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-light-induced reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30:1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2012.653887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. AbdElrazek DA, Ibrahim MA, Hassan NH, Hassanen EI, Farroh KY, Abass HI. Neuroprotective effect of Quercetin and Nano-Quercetin against Cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress in the rat brain: role of Nrf2/ HO-1/Keap-1 signaling pathway. Neurotoxicology. 2023;98:16–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hassan NH, Mehanna S, Hussien AM, Ibrahim MA, Hassanen EI. The potential mechanism underlying the hepatorenal toxicity induced by hymexazol in rats and the role of NF-κB signaling pathway. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2023;e23304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23304

  53. Sreelekha E, George B, Shyam A, Sajina N, Mathew B. A comparative study on the synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant activity of green and chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. BioNanoScience. 2021;11:489–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang B, He X, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Feng W. Metabolism of nanomaterials in vivo: blood circulation and organ clearance. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:761–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar2003336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nabinejad AR, Noaman V, Khayam Nekouei SM. Evaluation of silver residues accumulation in tissues of broilers treated with nano silver using MNSR (a clinical trial). Arch Razi Inst. 2016;71:51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kalaivani R, Maruthupandy M, Muneeswaran T, Hameedha Beevi A, Anand M, Ramakritinan CM, et al. Synthesis of chitosan mediated silver nanoparticles for potential antimicrobial applications. Front Lab Med. 2018;2:30–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flm.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zienkiewicz-Strzalka M, Derylo-Marczewska A, Skorik AY, Petrova VA, Choma A, Komaniecka I. Silver nanoparticles on chitosan/silica nanofibers: characterization and antibacterial activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, P.O.Box 12211, Giza, Egypt

    Eman I. Hassanen

  2. Toxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Ahmed M. Hussien

  3. Department of Veterinary Hygiene and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Sally Mehanna

  4. Poultry Disease Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Eman A. Morsy

Authors
  1. Eman I. Hassanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed M. Hussien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sally Mehanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eman A. Morsy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Eman, I. Hassanen and Eman, A. Morsy conceived the study, designed and performed the experiment, written the first draft of the manuscript and reviewed all the results; Eman, I. Hassanen performed the pathological studies; Eman, A. Morsy performed HI test; Ahmed, M. Hussien assessed oxidative stress evaluations and carried out data analysis; Sally Mehanna performed the behavioral parameters. All authors wrote, read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman I. Hassanen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the laboratory animal care and use (8th edition 2011) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Cairo University (IACUC), Cairo, Egypt.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanen, E.I., Hussien, A.M., Mehanna, S. et al. Chitosan coating silver nanoparticles as a promising feed additive in broilers chicken. BMC Vet Res 19, 265 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03826-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03826-7

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us