Skip to main content
Download PDF

Differential cellular localization of lectins in the testes of dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) during active and inactive breeding seasons

BMC Veterinary Research volume 19, Article number: 230 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The reproductive activity of the male dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) as a seasonal breeder is affected by various seasonal changes that reflect on the reproductive performance. In the current study, we explored a differential cellular localization of lectins in eight dromedary camel testes utilizing lectin histochemistry (LHC). The glycoconjugates’ localizations were detected within the testicular tissue utilizing 13 biotin-labeled lectins (PNA, ConA, LCA, RCA120, GS IB4, WGA, BPL, DBA, ECA, PHA-E4, UEA-1, PTL-II, and SBA) distributed into six sets. The cellular structures revealed diverse lectins distribution that may reflect various glycoproteins’ structures and their compositional modifications during spermatogenesis. Some of the investigated lectins were restricted to acrosomes of spermatids that will help study different stages during the spermatogenic cycle of dromedary camel, particularly PNA, and ECA. The statistical analysis showed a marked positive correlation between the response intensity of various lectins and the breeding season (P < 0.05). We can conclude that lectins have a fundamental role during camel spermatogenesis and are associated with the reproductive activity of dromedary camel.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Camel has a high ability to survive under harsh conditions [1, 2]. The reproductive activity of camels was a main subject that was interesting to many researchers [3,4,5]. It is well known that reproduction in camel is affected by many various factors affecting spermatogenesis including hormonal, biochemical, cytokines, and direct interaction between somatic and spermatogenic cells. All these factors are in turn affected by seasonal variations. During the rutting or breeding period, the male camel reveals higher sexual activity [6,7,8]. The dromedary camel as a seasonal breeder has extreme gross, microscopic, and ultra-structural morphological changes in genital organs, which give rise to different hormonal urges, which in turn lead to different reproductive activities and sexual behaviors during different seasons [9].

The camel testis showed seasonal and monthly alterations but there is no complete activity stoppage [3, 10]. During all seasons, spermatogenesis is persistent but it is significantly activated through the rut season [7, 9, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Camel testes includes several glycoconjugates (containing glucosyl, galactosyl, and mannosyl residues), and they are deficient in fucosyl residues, both in the active breeding season and in the non-breeding season [3].

Spermatogenesis is a highly self-renewing productive mechanism that consumes around 30 − 75 days in various mammals [19, 20]. Although the spermatogenesis features are similar in all mammals [21], some characteristics such as morphological characteristics of germ cells, number of generations, and type can vary between species [22, 23]. Cellular glycoconjugates depend on interactions between carbohydrates and proteins indicating the oligosaccharides importance [24, 25]. The sugar codes express the biological information and the glycan epitopes transmission [26,27,28,29,30].

The lectins are non-immune glycoproteins that precipitate glycoconjugates [31,32,33,34]. Lectins could be termed as non-immunoglobulin proteins able to specifically recognize and reversibly bind to carbohydrate moieties without changing the covalent composition of the glycosyl ligands [33, 35]. Lectins could be obtained from invertebrates, plants, or vertebrates, and they have specific affinities for sugar sequences or glycoconjugate sugar residues [36, 37]. Therefore, lectins have been utilized to detect the distribution of glycoconjugate in malignant and normal tissues [38,39,40]. Furthermore, many reports have confirmed that cellular glycoconjugates have pivotal functions such as motility, development, and growth regulation [41,42,43]. Many studies have revealed various modulations in the sugar residues within the spermatocytes that differ between species such as some domesticated mammals [30, 44,45,46], rodents [47, 48], and humans [49].

It is well known that most previous studies were concerned with the evaluation of either testicular morphology or the hormonal profile of camel. In addition, the previous studies on the lectins in the dromedary testes were very few. So, the aim of this work referred to elucidate the seasonal variations of a wide range of sugar residues in the dromedary camel testis at the level of LHC and their association with reproductive performance to provide helpful data for better understanding spermatogenesis occurred during active and inactive breeding seasons.

Materials and methods

Animal samples

Eight male apparently healthy adult camels were used in the present study. The samples were obtained from Kom Hamada abattoir (four camels in the Summer and Winter seasons). The right testis was taken just after slaughtering. The specimens were gathered in 4% paraformaldehyde solution in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for lectin histochemistry.

Lectin histochemistry (LHC)

LHC was conducted according to MS Gewaily, M Kassab, A Aboelnour, EA Almadaly and AE Noreldin [30]. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated till saturated with distilled water. Then, the antigen retrieval was applied using 0.02 M of Tris HCL (PH 9) autoclaved for 15 min at 95ºC. After washing with PBS, the non-specific reactions were discarded utilizing 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS solution including 0.05% NaN3 for 5 min. We incubated sections with biotin-labeled lectins (1:200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) (Table 1) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with PBS, the immunoreaction was visualized by Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugate (1:400, Invitrogen) incubated for 1 h at room temperature pursued by PBS washing. The sections were counterstained by Hoechst 33,258 (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 10 min. After PBS washing, we mounted sections utilizing Fluoromount™ (Diagnostic BioSystems, Japan). Finally, the examination of the stained sections was carried out by fluorescence microscope (BZ-X710; Keyence, Japan).

Table 1 Biotinylated lectins that have been used in this study, sugars binding specificities, and their inhibitory sugars. Man: mannose. Glc: glucose, Fuc: fucose, Gal: Galactose, GlcNAc: N-acetylglucosamine, GalNAc: N-acetyl galactosamine
Full size table

Specific reactions of lectin staining were confirmed by exposure of negative control sections to Streptavidin without lectins. The intensities of staining were grouped into five classes: no labeling, weak labeling, moderate labeling, strong labeling, and very strong labeling as (–), (+), (++), (+++), and (++++) respectively. The biotinylated lectins utilized in this investigation and their inhibitory sugars and binding specificities are revealed in Table 1.

Statistical analysis

We classified the reactions of each cell to various lectins depending on the staining intensities. 1 (negative response), 2 (low response), 3 (medium response), 4 (strong response), and 5 (very strong response). We studied the correlation between the response intensity and several variables, such as lectin type, lectin class, breeding season, and testicular cell type utilizing a generalized linear regression model (ordinal logistic regression) with the response intensity as the output variable [50]. We assessed the odds ratios to evaluate the correlation between the variable of response intensity and other variables. We carried out the statistical analyses utilizing IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Armonk, NY. USA).

Results

All investigated lectins in the present study showed different labeling intensities in the camel testicular cells either spermatogenic (spermatogonia; Sg, spermatocytes; Sp, round spermatids; Rs, and elongated spermatids; Es), somatic Sertoli cells or interstitial cells (IC). This localization pattern was confirmed by the negative control result (Fig. 1A and B). The labeling intensities of different lectins are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The labeling intensities of different lectins in the one-humped camel testis during rutting and non-rutting seasons. The used lectin groups included Glc; Glucose binding lectin, Gal; Galactose binding lectin, GlcNAc; Glucose amine binding lectin, GalNAc; Galactose amine binding lectin, Fu; Fucose binding lectin, and NS; Nonspecific binding lectin. Sg; spermatogonia, Sp; spermatocytes, Rs; round spermatids, Es; elongated spermatids, Sc; Sertoli Cells, IC; interstitial Cells. The levels of labeling were described as negative (-), weak (+), moderate (++), strong (+++), and very strong (++++)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

lectin histochemistry (LHC) in the testes of dromedary camel revealing positions of glucose (Glc) binding lectins; ConA, and LCA as well as a negative control during rutting (A, C, E) and non-rutting (B, D, F) seasons. The cellular nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 (blue fluorescence). Spermatogonia; Sg: white arrowhead, Spermatocyte; Sp: white arrow, round spermatid; Rs: yellow arrow, elongated spermatid; Es: yellow arrowhead, Sertoli cell: green arrowhead, and interstitial cells; IC: green arrow. There was not any reactivity in the negative control section in both breeding and non-breeding seasons. ConA was mildly labeled in spermatocytes and interstitial cells in both seasons. LCA was more labeled in spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and interstitial cells but in a higher intensity (red fluorescence) in breeding than in the non-breeding season in addition to the basement membrane and interstitial blood vessels (red arrow). Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

Glucose (glc) binding lectins

The Glc-binding lectins (ConA, LCA) were absent in Sertoli cells, round, and elongated spermatids in both breeding and non-breeding seasons. However, they were localized in other spermatogenic (Sg and Sp) and interstitial cells, they showed higher expression in rutting than non-rutting months. In addition, the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule as well as interstitial blood vessels were strongly labeled by LCA (Figs. 1C-F and 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Summarized data representing the labeling intensities of different investigated lectins in the dromedary camel testes in different testicular cells during rutting and non-rutting season (A-E) spermatogonia (Sg), spermatocyte (Sp), round spermatid (Rs), elongated spermatid (Es), Sertoli cells (Sc) and interstitial cells (IC)

Full size image

Galactose (gal) binding lectins

Gal-binding lectin was examined via three lectins: PNA, RCA, and GS-IB4 which were not localized in Sertoli cells. The IC was not labeled by PNA and was moderately labeled by GS-IB4 all over the year. On the other hand, RCA labeling was more expressed in breeding than in non-breeding season. Both spermatogonia and spermatocytes were strongly labeled by Gal-binding lectins in rutting months or not labeled during non-rutting months. Notably, the round and elongated spermatids clearly localized all investigated lectins within this group; however, the intensity was stronger in active than non-active seasons (Figs. 3 and 2B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

LHC in the testes of dromedary camel displaying positions of galactose (Gal) binding lectins; PNA (upper panel), RCA (middle panel), and GS-IB4 (lower panel) during rutting (A, C, E) and non-rutting (B, D, F) seasons. The cellular nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 (blue fluorescence). Spermatogonia; Sg: white arrowhead, Spermatocyte; Sp: white arrow, round spermatid; Rs: yellow arrow, elongated spermatid; Es: yellow arrowhead, Sertoli cell: green arrowhead, and interstitial cells; IC: green arrow. The round and elongated spermatids clearly reacted to all investigated lectins within this group; however, the intensity (red fluorescence) was stronger in active than non-active seasons as well as interstitial tissue for RCA. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

Glucose amine (GlcNAc) binding lectin

GlcNAc was investigated by WGA. It was worth notably that this lectin had nearly the same labeling pattern in both rutting and non-rutting camels’ testis. The WGA labeling affinity was restricted to spermatogonia (weak intensity), spermatocytes (very strong intensity), round spermatids (moderate intensity), and elongated spermatids (strong intensity). The other cellular component of the camel testis (Sertoli cells, IC) showed negative localization for WGA (Figs. 4A-B and 2C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

LHC in the testes of dromedary camel displaying positions of GlcNAc; WGA (upper panel) and GalNAc; BPL and DBA (middle and lower panels respectively) during rutting (A, C, E) and non-rutting (B, D, F) seasons. The cellular nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 (blue fluorescence). Spermatogonia; Sg: white arrowhead, Spermatocyte; Sp: white arrow, round spermatid; Rs: yellow arrow, elongated spermatid; Es: yellow arrowhead, Sertoli cell: green arrowhead, and interstitial cells; IC: green arrow. WGA had nearly the same labeling pattern (red fluorescence) in both rutting and non-rutting camels’ testes. BPL was mainly restricted in the spermatids (Rs and Es) with strong expression during the rutting season. DBA was absent in most testicular cells except for weak localization in the elongated spermatid during the active breeding season. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

Galactose amine (GalNAc) binding lectins

GalNAc was examined in the testicular components of the camel testis by many lectins including BPL, DBA, ECA, SBA, and PTL-II. BPL was mainly restricted in the spermatids (round and elongated) with strong expression during the rutting season and moderate intensity during the inactive season in addition to weak localization in IC during both seasons (Fig. 4C-D). DBA was absent in most testicular cells except for weak localization in the elongated spermatid during the active breeding season (Fig. 4E-F). ECA was also restricted in the spermatids but in a strong labeling intensity during both seasons (Fig. 5A-B). SBA was localized in all testicular cells even in the Sertoli cells but by the stronger intensity in rutting than non-rutting periods (Fig. 5C-D). PTL-II was strongly localized in rutting camel spermatids and IC while in the non-rutting camel, it was moderately found in IC and weak in the spermatids while, it was absent in other testicular cells (Fig. 5E-F). The differential expression within this group of lectins was summarized in Fig. 2D.

Fig. 5
figure 5

LHC in the testes of dromedary camel revealing positions of GalNAc; ECA (upper panel), SBA (middle panel), and PTL-II (lower panel) during rutting (A, C, E) and non-rutting (B, D, F) seasons. The cellular nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 (blue fluorescence). Spermatogonia; Sg: white arrowhead, Spermatocyte; Sp: white arrow, round spermatid; Rs: yellow arrow, elongated spermatid; Es: yellow arrowhead, Sertoli cell: green arrowhead, and interstitial cells; IC: green arrow. ECA was restricted to the Rs and Es in a strong reactivity (red fluorescence) during both seasons. SBA was localized in all testicular cells even in the Sertoli cells but by the stronger intensity in rutting than non-rutting periods. PTL-II was strongly localized in rutting camel spermatids and IC while in the non-rutting camel, it was moderately found in IC and weak in the spermatids. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

Fucose and nonspecific binding lectins

UEA-1 had a weak intensity in spermatocytes, moderate intensity in spermatids, and IC in rutting camel testis. While in the non-rutting camel, it was absent except for weak labeling in spermatocytes and IC (Figs. 6A-B and 2E).

Fig. 6
figure 6

LHC in the testes of dromedary camel showing cellular localization of fucose binding lectin (UEA-1) and non-specific binding lectin (PHA-E4) during rutting (A, C) and non-rutting (B, D) seasons. The cellular nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 (blue fluorescence). Spermatogonia; Sg: white arrowhead, Spermatocyte; Sp: white arrow, round spermatid; Rs: yellow arrow, elongated spermatid; Es: yellow arrowhead, Sertoli cell: green arrowhead, and interstitial cells; IC: green arrow. UEA-1 had a weak intensity in spermatocytes, and moderate intensity in spermatids and IC in rutting camel testes but in the non-rutting camel, it was absent except for weak labeling in spermatocytes and IC. PHA-E4 reacted to all testicular cells of both species except spermatogonia and Sertoli cells. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

PHA-E4 represented the nonspecific binding lectin that was absent in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells while showing a strong reaction in the other testicular cells during both active and inactive seasons (Figs. 6C-D and 2E).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis in Table 3 did not show any marked correlation between the response intensity and most of the indicator variables such as type and group of lectins and the cell type (p > 0.05). On the other hand, a marked correlation between the breeding season and response intensity was detected at P < 0.05. Odds ratio estimates showed a tendency for a non-significant stronger response depending on the name of the lectin used (OR: 1.176). Moreover, the intensity of response was modified by 0.994 and 0.751 points based on the cell type and lectin group, respectively. Breeding season significantly alters the intensity of response by 0.498 points.

Table 3 Results of generalized linear regression model for the association between the intensity of the response and different variables including the group of lectins, name of lectin, breeding season, and type of cell examined
Full size table

Discussion

Spermatogenesis in the camel is more active during the winter season, but it is reduced without complete spermatogenesis during the summer season [5, 10, 51]. Therefore, many factors affecting spermatogenesis showed variation between the two periods of the year. One of these factors is the distribution of different sugar residues in adult camel testicular cells during non-rutting and rutting seasons that have been investigated in the present study. Most of these residues are limited to the interstitial Leydig cells and germ cells, while the Sertoli cells are rarely reacted or even left unlabeled as previously reported by [3, 52].

The lectin histochemistry is attributed to revealing certain epitopes on the glycan chains of cellular glycoconjugates [30, 53, 54] that may give the sugar residues the ability to store biological data. Additionally, the importance of lectin histochemistry includes using lectin-specific markers in cytochemistry and histochemistry, purifying reactive sugar receptors, designing selective high-affinity ligands of glycoconjugates, and aiming to make long-term participation in structure-function relationships at the level of cells, molecules, organs, and tissues [53, 55].

The results of this study revealed that the camel testicular components reacted to the most investigated lectins (Glc, Gal, GlcNAc, GalNAc). In the camel testis, the structural allocation of the sugar moieties may suggest that specific sugar residues are crucial for spermatogenesis through different seasons. Therefore, their expression appeared in different patterns. The specific protein-carbohydrate interactions are considered an important factor responsible for controlling and regulating numerous regulatory processes, such as cell growth, apoptosis, glycoprotein folding and transport, and cell adhesion [53, 56]. All investigated lectins in the present study did not have any reactivity with Sertoli cells except SBA. This could be explained that the main role of sugar residues during spermatogenesis occurred through the spermatogenic cells [57] and interstitial cells, not the somatic cells.

The Glc-binding lectins (LCA and ConA) were restricted to Spermatogonia, Spermatocytes, and interstitial cells, particularly during the active breeding season in agreement with [3] where mannose and glucose residues are prevalent in the compounds having ion transport properties [58, 59]. Moreover, strong LCA reactivity in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubule was observed that may be necessary for interactions between Sertoli and germ cells during spermatogenesis [60].

The acrosomes of spermatids include many glycoproteins-associated enzymes such as acrosin, acid phosphatase, and hyaluronidase which are crucial for fertilization. Therefore, spermatids were the major lectin-linked cells in the camel testis [3, 61, 62]. Gal-binding lectins were mainly localized in the spermatid during both breeding seasons, particularly PNA that had no labeling with interstitial cells. Therefore, it could be used as an acrosomal marker during studying spermatogenesis by IHC. It is worth mentioning that the galactose residues were suggested as markers of cell differentiation [58, 63] and essential for intercellular adhesions [64, 65]. Furthermore, spermatid glycans engage in ion transport as well as contact and interaction with adjacent Sertoli cells [66]. Therefore, the galactose residues are common in glycans that interfere with fluid and ion transport, anchoring structure development and are also thought to be indicators of acrosomal differentiation [67, 68].

GlcNAc (WGA) had nearly the same labeling pattern in both rutting and non-rutting camels’ testis in Spermatogonia, Spermatocytes, round and elongated spermatids that may refer to its essential role during both seasons, particularly at the level of spermatogenic cells. On the other hand, previous investigations revealed that WGA was labeled in spermatocytes and spermatogonia only through the rutting season in addition to constant reactivity to the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubules and Leydig cells during both seasons [3].

Regarding GalNAc, there was a wide range of distribution in the seminiferous epithelium as well as interstitial cells by different intensities of response. The different reactivities within the same group of lectin may be due to various terminating oligosaccharides according to the variety of linkage and underlying glycoconjugate residues [69, 70] since similar monosaccharide binding by various lectins might result in different fine specificities.

The current study clarified that most investigated lectins were clearly reactive to the interstitial Leydig cells during both rutting and non-rutting seasons. It was previously reported that Leydig cells in the dromedary camel testis go through two phases of increased activity throughout the year. The first phase begins in the early months of winter, while the second, occurring in the summer, is not as obvious as the first one and may be necessary to keep spermatogenesis at a low level until the next highest activity period [71,72,73]. This indicates that camel Leydig cells are active throughout the year, with high activity during the active rutting period. This activity is similar to that of the spermatogenic epithelium.

The statistical analysis in the current study displayed a significant correlation between the response intensity and breeding season where the breeding season significantly alters the intensity of response by 0.498 points. These findings support the idea that a particular type of carbohydrate is necessary for effective spermatogenesis during the active breeding season [69].

In conclusion, the distribution profile of glycoconjugates within the camel testis is affected by breeding season and affects somatic-spermatogenic cellular adhesion which in turn affects spermatogenesis and reproductive performance. Furthermore, certain examined lectins particularly PNA and ECA were found to be restricted to the acrosomes of spermatids, which could be valuable for the investigation of various stages in the spermatogenic cycle of the dromedary camel.

Data Availability

All data and materials were present in the article.

References

  1. Ibrahim MA, Abd-El-Rahman HM. Studies on some biochemical, hormonal, histopathological and seminal characters in relation to rutting and non-rutting season in camels. Alexandria J Veterinary Sci. 2016;49(2):189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashour G, Abdel-Rahman SM. Camels as a miracle key for animal production sustainability in Egypt. Egypt J Anim Prod. 2022;59(4):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abd-Elmaksoud A, Sayed-Ahmed A, Kassab M, Aly K. Histochemical mapping of glycoconjugates in the testis of the one humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) during rutting and non-rutting seasons. Acta Histochem. 2008;110(2):124–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdel-Raouf M, El-Bab MR, Owaida MM. Studies on reproduction in the camel (Camelus dromedarius) V. morphology of the testis in relation to age and season. J Reprod Fertil. 1975;43(1):109–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tibary A, El Allali K. Dromedary camel: a model of heat resistant livestock animal. Theriogenology. 2020;154:203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pasha R, Qureshi AS, Lodhi L, Jamil H, Masood A, Hamid S, Iqbal J, Kamran Z, Khamas W. Seasonal changes in the anatomy of testis of one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). J Camel Pract Res. 2011;18(1):145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elsharnoby H, Kandil O, Abu-Elnaga H. Dromedary camel epididymal sperm characteristics at breeding and non-breeding seasons. Al-Azhar Bull Sci. 2021;32(1–C):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Bulushi S, Manjunatha B, De Graaf S, Rickard J. Reproductive seasonality of male dromedary camels. Anim Reprod Sci. 2019;202:10–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasha RH, Qureshi AS, Ur-Rehman Z, Khamas WA. (2013) Seasonal anatomical changes in the testis of the one-humped camel: a review. Eur j anat:132–41.

  10. Gherissi DE, Afri-Bouzebda F, Bouzebda Z. Seasonal changes in the testicular morphology and interstitial tissue histomorphometry of Sahraoui camel under Algerian extreme arid conditions. Biol Rhythm Res. 2018;49(2):291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tingari M, Ramos A, Gaili E, Rahma B, Saad A. Morphology of the testis of the one-humped camel in relation to reproductive activity. J Anat. 1984;139(Pt 1):133.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdel-Raouf M, El-Bab MF, Owaida M. Studies on reproduction in the camel. (Camelus Dromedarius) Reproduction. 1975;43(1):109–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elwishy A. Reproduction in the male dromedary (Camelus dromedarius): a review. Anim Reprod Sci. 1988;17(3–4):217–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abd-Elaziz M, Kassem A, Zaghloul D, Derbalah A, Bolefa M. Ultrastructure of the interstitial tissue in the testis of Egyptian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Pak Vet J. 2012;32:65–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain R. Morphological and functional characteristics of the testis of one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) in the natural ecology of Punjab, Pakistan. Faisalabad Pakistan: University Of Agriculture; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osman D, Plöen L. Spermatogenesis in the camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anim Reprod Sci. 1986;10(1):23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh U, Bharadwaj M. Histological studies on the testicular seminal pathway and changes in the epididymis of the camel (Camelus dromedarius). Cells Tissues Organs. 1980;108(4):481–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ainani H, Achaâban MR, Tibary A, Pévet P, Simonneaux V, El Allali K. Environmental and neuroendocrine control of breeding activity in the dromedary camel. Revue Marocaine Des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires. 2018;6(2):143–57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kubota H, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2018;99(1):52–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao X, Wan W, Zhang X, Wu Z, Yang H. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in large animals. Animals. 2021;11(4):918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharpe R. (1994) Regulation of spermatogenesis. The physiology of reproduction 1:1363–1434.

  22. De Rooij DG, Russell LD. All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl. 2000;21(6):776–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gherissi DE, Boukhili M, Gherissi A. (2020) Genital histomorphometrical evaluation and survey on reproductive traits of male camel (Camelus dromedarius) in relation to the pubertal age under extreme arid conditions. Asian J Agric Biology 8(4).

  24. Manning J, Seyrek K, Kaltner H, André S, Sinowatz F, Gabius H. (2004) Glycomic profiling of developmental changes in bovine testis by lectin histochemistry and further analysis of the most prominent alteration on the level of the glycoproteome by lectin blotting and lectin affinity chromatography. Histology and histopathology.

  25. Cheng C-W, Wu C-Y, Hsu W-L, Wong C-H. Programmable one-pot synthesis of oligosaccharides. Biochemistry. 2019;59(34):3078–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gabius H-J. Biological information transfer beyond the genetic code: the sugar code. Naturwissenschaften. 2000;87(3):108–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gabius H-J, André S, Kaltner H, Siebert H-C. The sugar code: functional lectinomics. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-General Subj. 2002;1572(2–3):165–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gabius HJ, Siebert HC, André S, Jiménez-Barbero J, Rüdiger H. Chemical biology of the sugar code. ChemBioChem. 2004;5(6):740–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Solís D, Jiménez-Barbero J, Kaltner H, Romero A, Siebert H-C, Von der Lieth C-W, Gabius H-J. Towards defining the role of glycans as hardware in information storage and transfer: basic principles, experimental approaches and recent progress. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001;168(1–2):5–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gewaily MS, Kassab M, Aboelnour A, Almadaly EA, Noreldin AE. Comparative Cellular localization of Sugar residues in bull (Bos taurus) and donkey (Equus asinus) testes using Lectin Histochemistry. Microsc Microanal. 2021;27(6):1529–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldstein I, Poretz RD. (2012) Isolation, physicochemical characterization, and carbohydrate—binding specificity of Iectins. The lectins Properties, functions, and applications in biology and medicine:233–247.

  32. Goldstein IJ. What should be called a lectin? Nature. 1980;285:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsaneva M, Van Damme EJ. 130 years of plant lectin research. Glycoconj J. 2020;37(5):533–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Acharya PP, Sahu AK, Sahu D. (2019) Isolation and purification of lectin from pisum sativum.

  35. Vibhute P, Jaabir M, Sangeetha Bharath S, Sivakamavalli J. Overview of Lectins. In: Lectins. edn.: Springer; 2021: 1–25.

  36. Vibhute P, Radhakrishnan A, Sivakamavalli J, Chellapandian H, Selvin J. (2022) Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Role of Fish Lectins. Aquat Lectins:257–86.

  37. Gautam AK, Sharma D, Sharma J, Saini KC. Legume lectins: potential use as a diagnostics and therapeutics against the cancer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;142:474–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pinart E, Bonet S, Briz M, Pastor L, Sancho S, Garcıa N, Badia E, Bassols J. Histochemical study of the interstitial tissue in scrotal and abdominal boar testes. Vet J. 2002;163(1):68–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Verini-Supplizi A, Stradaioli G, Fagioli O, Parillo F. Localisation of the lectin reactive sites in adult and prepubertal horse testes. Res Vet Sci. 2000;69(2):113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mane V, Arakera SB, Pingle S, Thakkar L. Lectin as an Anticancer Therapeutic Agent. In: Handbook of Research on Natural products and their bioactive compounds as Cancer therapeutics. edn.: IGI Global; 2022: 384–97.

  41. Gabius H. Vertebrate lectins and their possible role in fertilization, development and Tumor biology. In vivo (Athens. Greece). 1987;1(2):75–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hakomori S-i. Glycosphingolipids in cellular interaction, differentiation, and oncogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50(1):733–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shivatare SS, Shivatare VS, Wong C-H. (2022) Glycoconjugates: Synthesis, Functional Studies, and Therapeutic Developments. Chemical Reviews.

  44. Ertl C, Wrobel K-H. Distribution of sugar residues in the bovine testis during postnatal ontogenesis demonstrated with lectin-horseradish peroxidase conjugates. Histochemistry. 1992;97(2):161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bains H, Bawa S, Pabst M, Sehgal S. Plasma membrane alterations of maturing goat (Capra indicus) spermatozoa: lectin-binding and freeze-fracture study. Cell Tissue Res. 1993;271(1):159–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bains H, Werner G, Bansal M, Bawa S. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Lectin Binding on the Epididymal Spermatozoa of Cat (Felis catus). Acta Microscopica. 1994;3(2):51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jones CJ, Morrison CA, Stoddart RW. Histochemical analysis of rat testicular glycoconjugates. 3. Non-reducing terminal residues in seminiferous tubules. Histochem J. 1993;25(10):711–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Martínez-Menárguez JA, Avilés M, Madrid JF, Castells M, Ballesta J. Glycosylation in Golgi apparatus of early spermatids of rat. A high resolution lectin cytochemical study. Eur J Cell Biol. 1993;61:21–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Arenas M, Madrid J, Bethencourt F, Fraile B, Paniagua R. Lectin histochemistry of the human testis. Int J Androl. 1998;21(6):332–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Harrell J, Frank E, Harrell FE. (2015) Ordinal logistic regression. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis:311–325.

  51. Samatar A, Ashour A, Zeidan A. Influence of Seasons of the Year and ages on the testicular measurements and semen characteristics of the male Dromedary camels. Al-Azhar. J Agricultural Res. 2022;47(1):89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Alkafafy M, Ebada S, Rashed R, Attia H. Comparative morphometric and glycohistochemical studies on the epididymal duct in the donkey (Equus asinus) and dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Acta Histochem. 2012;114(5):434–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gabius HJ. (2001) Glycohistochemistry: the why and how of detection and localization of endogenous lectins. Anatomia, histologia, embryologia 30(1):3–31.

  54. Gabius H-J, Manning J, Kopitz J, André S, Kaltner H. Sweet complementarity: the functional pairing of glycans with lectins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(10):1989–2016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Notova S. Ingénierie De Neo-lectines et lectines Janus. Université Grenoble Alpes; 2022.

  56. Kaltner H, Abad-Rodríguez J, Corfield AP, Kopitz J, Gabius H-J. The sugar code: letters and vocabulary, writers, editors and readers and biosignificance of functional glycan–lectin pairing. Biochem J. 2019;476(18):2623–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Abd-Elmaksoud A. Morphological, glycohistochemical, and immunohistochemical studies on the embryonic and adult bovine testis. lmu; 2005.

  58. Spicer S, Schulte B. Diversity of cell glycoconjugates shown histochemically: a perspective. J Histochem Cytochemistry. 1992;40(1):1–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Blackmore PF, Eisoldt S. The neoglycoprotein mannose–bovine serum albumin, but not progesterone, activates T-type calcium channels in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5(6):498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Budipitojo T, Padeta I, Yulianti BU, Masithoh DB. Distribution Profile and function of carbohydrate residues in testes of immature and mature Sunda Porcupine (Hystrix javanica). World. 2020;10(1):53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang N, Zhang X, Li X, Liu C, Yang M, Han B, Hai C, Su G, Li G, Zhao Y. Cysteine is highly enriched in the canonical N-linked glycosylation motif of bovine spermatozoa. N-Glycoproteome Theriogenology. 2022;184:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gould SF, Bernstein M. The localisation of bovine sperm hyaluronidases. Differentiation. 1975;3(1–3):123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gewaily MS, Noreldin AE, Dawood MA, Hegazy YM, Kassab M. The distribution profile of glycoconjugates in the testis of brown-banded bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium punctatum) by using lectin histochemistry. Microsc Microanal. 2021;27(5):1161–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Töpfer-Petersen E. Carbohydrate-based interactions on the route of a spermatozoon to fertilization. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(4):314–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Conte F, van Buuringen N, Voermans NC, Lefeber DJ. (2021) Galactose in human metabolism, glycosylation and congenital metabolic Diseases: time for a closer look. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General subjects 1865(8):129898.

  66. Sackstein R, Stowell SR, Hoffmeister KM, Freeze HH, Varki A. Glycans in systemic physiology. Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet]; 2022.

  67. Jones CJ, Morrison CA, Stoddart RW. Histochemical analysis of rat testicular glycoconjugates. 2. β-galactosyl residues in O-and N-linked glycans in seminiferous tubules. Histochem J. 1992;24(6):327–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Pomin VH. Phylogeny, structure, function, biosynthesis and evolution of sulfated galactose-containing glycans. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;84:372–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu AM, Sugii S, Herp A. (1988) A guide for carbohydrate specificities of lectins. Mol Immunol Complex Carbohydrates:819–47.

  70. Shivatare SS, Shivatare VS, Wong C-H. Glycoconjugates: synthesis, functional studies, and therapeutic developments. Chem Rev. 2022;122(20):15603–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Zayed A, Hifny A, Abou-Elmagd A, Wrobel K-H. Seasonal changes in the intertubular tissue of the camel testis (Camelus dromedarius). Annals of. Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 1995;177(3):199–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Marai IF, Zeidan A, Abdel-Samee A, Abizaid A, Fadiel A. Camels’reproductive and physiological performance traits as affected by environmental conditions. Trop Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2009;10(2):129–49.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rateb S. (2011) Improving Reproductive Efficiency of Sub-fertile One-Humped Bull Camels Under Semi-Arid Conditions. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. Agric. Alex. Univ. Egypt.

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors acknowledge and thank their universities.

Funding

Open access funding is provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt

    Mahmoud S. Gewaily

  2. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohamed Gaber Abdallah

  3. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Matrouh University, Matrouh, 51511, Egypt

    Norhan E. Khalifa

  4. Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Ola A. Habotta

  5. Department of Histology and Cytology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, 22511, Egypt

    Ahmed E. Noreldin

Authors
  1. Mahmoud S. Gewaily
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Gaber Abdallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norhan E. Khalifa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ola A. Habotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed E. Noreldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MSG and AEN designed and supervised the study. MSG, MGA, NEK, and OAH contributed to the experiment, setup, and data analysis. MSG, NEK, and AEN wrote the first versions of the manuscript with all authors’ contributions. All authors assisted with editing the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mahmoud S. Gewaily or Ahmed E. Noreldin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All steps of the experiment were carried out based on the Guidelines for Animal Care at Damanhour University in Egypt. All experimental protocols were ethically approved by the Committee of Local Experimental Animal Care, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Egypt (DMU/VetMed-2023/019).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gewaily, M.S., Abdallah, M.G., Khalifa, N.E. et al. Differential cellular localization of lectins in the testes of dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) during active and inactive breeding seasons. BMC Vet Res 19, 230 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03791-1

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us