Skip to main content

Regulation of mRNA and miRNA in the response to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection in chicken cecum



Salmonella enterica, serovar Enteritidis (SE) is a food-borne pathogen, which can cause great threat to human health through consumption of the contaminated poultry products. Chicken is the main host of SE. The mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles were analyzed on cecum of Shouguang chicken via next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics approaches. The treated group was inoculated SE, and the control group was inoculated with phosphate buffer saline (PBS).


There were 1760 differentially expressed mRNAs in the SE-infected group, of which 1046 were up-regulated mRNA, and 714 were down-regulated mRNA. In addition, a total of 821 miRNAs were identified, and 174 miRNAs were differentially expressed, of which 100 were up-regulated and 74 were down-regulated. Functional enrichment of differentially expressed mRNAs was similar to miRNA target genes. The functional analysis results of differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs were performed. Immune-related processes and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways were enriched by up-regulated mRNA. The down-regulated mRNAs were enriched in tissue development and metabolic-related KEGG pathways. The functional analysis of up-regulated miRNA target genes was similar to the down-regulated mRNAs. The down-regulated miRNA target genes were enriched in metabolic-related GO (Gene Ontology) -BP (Biological process) terms and KEGG pathways. The overlap of the up-regulated mRNA and the up-regulated miRNA target genes (class I) was 325, and the overlap of the down-regulated miRNA target genes (class II) was 169. The class I enriched in the immune-related GO-BP terms and KEGG pathways. The class II mainly enriched in metabolic-related GO-BP terms and KEGG pathways. Then we detected the expression of mRNA and miRNA through qRT-PCR. The results shown that the expression of HHIP, PGM1, HTR2B, ITGB5, RELN, SFRP1, TCF7L2, SCNN1A, NEK7, miR-20b-5p, miR-1662, miR-15a, miR-16-1-3p was significantly different between two groups. Dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to detect the relationship between miR-20b-5p and SCNN1A. The result indicated that miR-20b-5p regulate immune or metabolic responses after SE infection in Shouguang chickens by directly targeting SCNN1A.


The findings here contribute to the further analysis of the mechanism of mRNA and miRNA defense against SE infection, and provide a theoretical foundation for the molecular disease-resistant breeding of chickens.

Peer Review reports


Salmonella is an important food-borne zoonotic pathogen, which can directly or indirectly infect animals and further contaminates animal products such as meat, eggs, milk, etc., thereby posing a threat to human health [1]. Salmonellosis is an acute or chronic animal disease caused by certain specific serotypes of Salmonella, which has important public significance of health [2]. The bacterial serotype with the highest isolation rate in sick poultry is SE with an isolation rate of 37% [3, 4] which is a major cause of food-borne gastroenteritis. 40–80% of food poisoning incidents in developed countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States were caused by SE [5]. Chicken is the major reservoir of SE. It has been reported that the losses caused by egg-related salmonellosis have reached $44 million in Australia every year [6].

Transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc., have become important research tools, among which transcriptomics has been applied earlier and has the most extensive [7]. Transcriptome sequencing is widely used in skeletal muscle of mice [8], spleen of chicken [9], fallopian tube of horse [10], etc.. The expression of TLR1A in the cecum tissue was significantly up-regulated on 7-days post infection with SE of White Leghorn Layer in our previous research [11]. The research that performed RNA-Seq from lung and spleen samples suggested that an early inactivation of important host genes could prevent an exaggerated immune response and/or viral replication, conferring resistance to HPAIV in chickens [12]. In addition, transcriptomic analysis revealed that more severe disease in line W chicken was associated with significant up-regulation of pathways involved in inflammation, cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPases, and Wnt signaling in the bursa, etc. [13] And another research focused on cecum of 1-day-old chickens infected with SE by RNA-seq, and 104 differentially expressed genes were identified, included IL-22, IL-1β, etc. inflammation-related genes [14]. The expression of IL-17C, CIKS, TRAF6, NFkappaB, C/EBPbeta, and inflammatory chemokines were significantly up-regulated in response to co-infection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Escherichia coli in chicken [15]. The study of CA09 virus infection in mice was mostly involved with genes related to the extracellular matrix (ECM), while the most significant differences after SD56 infection in mice were in immune-related genes [16].

miRNA is an endogenous single-stranded non-coding RNA molecule with a length of 18–26 nt, which is widely present in natural animals, plants and viruses. miRNA can bind to the 3’UTR region of the target gene and participates in the inhibition of mRNA degradation or translation [17], and then affect protein coding and expression [18, 19]. A large body of research results showed that autoimmune diseases and immune dysregulation are associated with different miRNA expression changes in the target cells and tissues of adaptive or innate immunity. Next-generation sequencing technology has been applied in the field of miRNA research. The splenocyte miRNA profile of pig infected with T. gondii revealed that the coordination of a large number of miRNAs regulates the host immune response during infection [20]. The studies on the expression profile of miR-155 suggest that the altered expression and function of miR-155 can mediate vulnerability to autoimmune diseases [21]. By inhibiting the expression of adipocyte-related miR-103, the expression of porcine precursor adipocyte differentiation-related genes were significantly reduced [22]. miR-125a is significantly different expressed in liver and adipose tissue, plays a regulatory role in the MAPK signaling pathway [23].

The genome-wide miRNA–mRNA interaction network following SE inoculation was not clear. In the current study, the interaction between miRNAs and mRNAs in cecum of Shouguang chicken following SE inoculation was analyzed using next-generation sequencing technology.


Identification of differentially expressed mRNA and functional enrichment analysis

In total, there were 1046 up-regulated mRNAs and 714 down-regulated mRNAs identified (|log2 (fold change) | ≥1, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). The results of functional enrichment analysis of mRNAs were shown in Fig. 2. The mainly enriched GO terms (FDR < 0.0001) of up-regulated mRNAs was related to immune and inflammatory, such as immune system process, regulation of immune system process, immune response, positive regulation of immune system process and regulation of immune response, regulation of inflammatory response. Cell cycle related GO-BP terms were cell cycle DNA replication, positive regulation of cell cycle process. The defense response GO-BP term was defense response to bacterium (Fig. 2A). The enriched KEGG pathways included Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, Intestinal immune network for IgA production and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (FDR < 0.05) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The volcano map of differentially expressed mRNA, gray colour represents non-differentially expressed mRNA, red represents up-regulated mRNA and blue represents down-regulated of differentially expressed mRNA

Fig. 2
figure 2

The results of functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed mRNAs. A Enriched GO terms for up-regulated mRNAs. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 FDR. B Enriched KEGG pathway for up-regulated mRNAs. The x-axis was –log10 FDR, and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway. C Enriched GO terms for down-regulated mRNAs. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 FDR. D Enriched KEGG pathway for down-regulated mRNAs. The x-axis was –log10 FDR, and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway

The down-regulated mRNAs were intensively enriched in 5 GO-BP terms (FDR < 0.05),involved cell adhesion, biological adhesion, tissue development, negative regulation of smooth muscle cell migration and anatomical structure morphogenesis (Fig. 2C). The top20 KEGG pathways were ECM-receptor interaction (FDR < 0.05), Drug metabolism, Wnt signaling pathway, Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, PPAR signaling pathway, Pentose phosphate pathway (FDR > 0.05) and other pathways (Fig. 2D).

Identification of differentially expressed miRNA, the prediction of miRNA target genes and functional enrichment analysis

There were 174 significantly expressed miRNAs, of those miRNAs, 100 miRNAs were up-regulated and 74 miRNAs were down-regulated (|log2 (fold change) | ≥1, P ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 3). The up-regulated miRNAs had 5092 target genes, the down-regulated miRNAs had 2704 target genes, and 2163 genes were targeted by both up-regulated miRNA and down-regulated miRNA (Fig. 4). We annotated functions for the up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs target genes using WebGestalt. The up-regulated miRNA target genes were enriched a total of 90 GO terms (FDR < 0.05), including 62 biological process terms, 27 cellular component terms, and 1 molecular function. The enriched GO terms (Fig. 5A) mainly related to metabolism, apoptotic, transport, etc. The metabolism-related terms involved nucleic acid metabolic process, RNA metabolic process, mRNA metabolic process, regulation of protein metabolic process. However, KEGG pathway was not significant (FDR > 0.05), the top20 of KEGG pathway was shown in Fig. 5B, it was mainly related to endocytosis, fatty acid metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, Pentose phosphate pathway, PPAR signaling pathway, FoxO signaling pathway.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The results of differentially expressed miRNA. There were 100 up-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs, and 74 down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs

Fig. 4
figure 4

TargetScan and miRanda, were used to predict target genes of miRNAs, 2929 genes were targeted by up-regulated miRNAs alone, 541 genes were specifically targeted by down-regulated miRNAs, and 2163 genes were targeted by both

Fig. 5
figure 5

The results of functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed miRNA target genes. A Enriched GO terms for up-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 FDR. B Enriched KEGG pathway for up-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was –log10 FDR, and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway. C Enriched GO terms for down-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 FDR. D Enriched KEGG pathway for down-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was –log10 FDR, and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway

The down-regulated miRNA target genes were enriched in 5 GO-BP terms and 7 GO-CC (Cellular component) terms, and no GO-MF (Molecular function) terms was enriched (FDR < 0.05) (Fig. 5C). GO-BP terms involved the regulation of protein metabolism, macromolecule modification, cell protein modification process, protein modification process, and cell protein metabolism regulation, which were all related to protein synthesis and metabolism. The enriched KEGG pathways (Fig. 5D) of down-regulated miRNA target genes gathered in Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (FDR < 0.05), ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, Salmonella infection, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and fatty acid metabolism (FDR > 0.05).

The analysis combined differentially expressed mRNA and miRNA

We combined the differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNA target genes to explore the regulation in Shouguang chickens infected with SE. The overlap of the up-regulated mRNAs and the up-regulated miRNAs target genes was 325, and the overlap of the up-regulated mRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs target genes (class I) was 196. The overlap of the down-regulated mRNAs and up-regulated miRNA target genes (class II) was 221, and the overlap of the down-regulated mRNAs and down-regulated 1 was 111 (Table 1). For example, the down-regulated mRNAs, SCNN1A and NEK7 were targeted by the up-regulated miRNAs, miR-20b-5p and miR-15a. And the up-regulated mRNA CENPM was targeted by the down-regulated miRNA miR-1662. Since mRNA and miRNA have potential negative regulatory relationship, we performed functional enrichment analysis of mRNA and miRNA with negative regulatory relationship (class I and class II). The enriched GO-BP terms of class I (P < 0.05) mainly included immune response, innate immune response, inflammatory response, leukocyte activation involved in inflammatory response, defense response to bacterium, toll-like receptor signaling pathway, regulation of cAMP metabolic process (Fig. 6A). There were 8 KEGG pathways (P < 0.05) have been enriched, including Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, Intestinal immune network for IgA production, Salmonella infection, Steroid biosynthesis, Cell adhesion molecules and Jak-STAT signaling pathway (Fig. 6B), which were related to the internal regulation of chicken post-infection with SE.

Table 1 The results of correlated mRNA -miRNA
Fig. 6
figure 6

The results of functional enrichment analysis for the overlap of differentially expressed mRNA and miRNA target genes. A Enriched GO terms for the overlap of up-regulated mRNA and down-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 (P value). B Enriched KEGG pathway for the overlap of up-regulated mRNA and down-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was –log10 (P value), and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway. C Enriched GO terms for the overlap of down-regulated mRNA and up-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was the GO terms and the y-axis was the –log10 (P value). D Enriched KEGG pathway for the overlap of down-regulated mRNA and up-regulated miRNA target genes. The x-axis was –log10 (P value), and the y-axis was the KEGG pathway

The enriched GO-BP terms (P < 0.05) of class II were mainly related to cell development and differentiation processes such as protein heterotrimerization, regulation of cell shape, cardiac muscle fiber development, and blood vessel development, etc. (Fig. 6C). A total of 6 KEGG pathways (P < 0.05) were significantly enriched, involved ECM-receptor interaction, Focal adhesion, Regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and Drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, Retinol metabolism, Wnt signaling pathway, which related to the metabolism (Fig. 6D).

Interacting network of differentially expressed mRNA and differentially expressed miRNA target genes

We selected some differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs (P < 0.05) randomly to draw the interaction network with Cytoscape, version 3.8 (Fig. 7). There were 12 target genes were both targeted by miR-15a and miR-20b-5p, included PGM1, CENPM, SCNN1A, and NEK7. There were 4 target genes RNF141, CENPM, SCNN1A and NEK7 both targeted by miR-15a and miR-1662. CENPM, SCNN1A, and NEK7 were targeted by miR-1662, miR-15a, miR-20b-5p.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Interacting network of differentially expressed mRNA and differentially expressed miRNA target genes. The yellow bottom layer represented differentially expression miRNA, the blue bottom layer represented differentially expression mRNA, and the line indicated the relationship between the two mRNA and miRNA. CENPM, SCNN1A, and NEK7 were simultaneously targeted by miR-20b-5p, miR-15a and miR-1662

Verification of differentially expressed mRNA and miRNAs

The relative expression of 11 mRNAs and 4 miRNAs were validated through quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR). The results (Fig. 8) showed that 9 mRNAs (HHIP, PGM1, HTR2B, ITGB5, and RELN (P < 0.01), TCF7L2, SFRP1, SCNN1A and NEK7 (P < 0.05)) were differentially down-regulated, CENPM and TLR1A were up-regulated, which consistent with the trend of RNA-seq (P > 0.05). miR-20b-5p, miR-16-1-3p (P < 0.01) and miR-15a (P < 0.05) were significantly up-regulated, and miR-1662 (P < 0.05) was down-regulated in the treated group (Fig. 9). The result was consistent with the miRNA-seq. According to the results, we can see that the expression trend of miR-1662 is opposite to that of CENPM and TLR1A, and the expression trend of miR-20b-5p, miR-16-1-3p and miR-15a is opposite to that of the other 9 differentially expressed mRNAs.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Relative expression of 11 differentially mRNAs. β-actin was the internal reference. Note: ** represent an extremely significant difference (P < 0.01); * represent a significant difference (P < 0.05), compared with the control group

Fig. 9
figure 9

Relative expression of 4 differentially miRNAs. U6 was the internal reference. Note: ** represent an extremely significant difference (P < 0.01); * represent a significant difference (P < 0.05)

Validation of targeting relationships between SCNN1A and miR-20b-5p using dual-luciferase reporter assay

The binding sites of miR-20b-5p and wild-type/mutant target sequences of SCNN1A into psiCHECK2 was showed in Fig. 10A. The dual-luciferase activity among 4 groups (psiCHECK2 + miR-20b-5p mimics, miR-20b-5p mimics NC + Wild, miR-20b-5p mimics/NC + Mut) was no significant difference, but the miR-20b-5p mimic + wild group was significantly lower than the other groups. The result indicated that miR-20b-5p can bind to the sequence of the 3’UTR of SCNN1A on the wild-type vector, thus reducing the luciferase acsetivity (Fig. 10B).

Fig. 10
figure 10

The results of dual-luciferase reporter system. A The sequences of wild type and mutant dual-luciferase reporter vector. Red nucleotides represented bind sites between miR-20b-5p and SCNN1A 3’UTR. B The relative luciferase activity of 5 groups. The relative luciferase activity of miR-20b-5p mimic + wild group was significantly lower than the other groups


Regulation of mRNA in the response to SE infection in Shouguang chicken

Transcriptome sequencing can accurately and efficiently obtain almost all the transcripts of a specific tissue at a certain period of time, and deeply excavated the subtle changes in the differential expression of each gene in the tissue or cell [24]. In current study, the KEGG pathways of up-regulated mRNAs had been enriched were mainly immune-related processes such as immune response, the intestinal immune network that produces immunoglobulin A, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Researchers have pointed out that SE infection could active the immune response of body. Matulova’s research results showed that the expression of immunoglobulin A, G and other related genes in White Leghorn Layer chickens and other chicken breeds also increased significantly after infection, which is consistent with this experiment [14]. Up-regulated mRNAs were significantly enriched in the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway in our study. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) were a type of pattern recognition receptors that could specifically recognize pathogen-related molecular patterns (PAMPs) [25]. As an important component of the body’s immune system, the body’s immune process was regulated by TLRs while activated innate immunity [26]. Different types of TLRs were expressed in the spleen, liver, lungs, intestines and other different tissues of the body, and were mainly distributed in various immune cells such as B cells, T cells and dendritic cells in various tissues [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Compared to the control group, the expression of TLR1A, TLR1B, TLR2A and TLR2B in the treated group were significantly up-regulated through RNA-seq in our research, which was consistent with Mitra’s research of TLR1B, TLR2B and TLR4 showed a continuous up-regulation in the cecum of chickens during infection or vaccination, followed by challenge with virulent parasites [33]. In addition, the expression of TLR1A in the cecum tissue was significantly up-regulated on 7-days post infection with SE of White Leghorn Layer in our previous research [11]. Therefore, we suspected that the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway played a potential role in chicken infection with SE. We found that the GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched by down-regulated genes were closely related to the development and metabolism of the body, such as tissue development, Wnt signaling pathway, and cytochrome P450 metabolism. The Wnt signaling pathway originated from int-like genes in Drosophila, which could influence cell differentiation and proliferation through signal transduction, thereby regulating growth and development [34]. The TCF7L2 protein was a key transcriptional effector of the Wnt signaling pathway, which was an important developmental pathway that negatively regulates adipogenesis [35, 36]. Inactivation of TCF7L2 protein by removing the high-mobility group (HMG)-box DNA binding domain in mature adipocytes in vivo led to whole-body glucose intolerance and hepatic insulin resistance. This phenotype was associated with increased subcutaneous adipose tissue mass, adipocyte hypertrophy, and inflammation [35]. In this work, the TCF7L2 gene was significantly down-regulated, which was consistent with Chen’s research. We speculated that the development of adipose tissue in Shouguang chickens infected with SE was negatively affected, which in turn caused the growth and development of the body to be hindered and an inflammatory response occurred. At the same time, the appearance of glucose intolerance would also affect the glucose metabolism process. Phosphoglucomutase (PGM) catalyzed the interconversion of glucose-1 phosphate (Glc-1P) and glucose-6 phosphate (Glc-6P) and therefore, it played a fundamental role in glycolysis, glycogenesis, and glycogenolysis [37]. In the present experiment, the expression levels of PGM1, PGM3, and PGM5 were all significantly down-regulated. It can be seen that the synthesis of phosphoglucomutase in Shouguang chickens infected with SE was inhibited. PGM1 deficiency resulted in a mixed phenotype of a Glycogen Storage Disorder and a Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation (CDG) [38]. The symptoms of CDG included muscle cramps, rigid limbs after exercise, slow energy recovery, etc. This might be one of the reasons for the malaise and loss of appetite in chickens infected with SE. Therefore, we boldly speculated that at the mRNA level, the infection of SE mainly caused immune responses in Shouguang chickens. At the same time, it also affected the growth, development and metabolism of the body by regulating the differentiation of adipocytes and the process of glucose metabolism.

Regulation of mRNA in the response to SE infection in Shouguang chicken

Next Generation Sequencing can be performed on any tissue/organ without prior information about sequences or secondary structure. It can also detect miRNAs with very low copy numbers, which reflect either a low expression level in the tissue or a contribution from minor cell types such as blood or adipose or connective tissues in the biopsy specimen [39,40,41]. In this experiment, the number of up-regulated miRNAs was more than down-regulated miRNAs, which was consisted with the other researches of miRNA sequencing in chicken [42, 43]. The pathways for up-regulated miRNA target genes were cell apoptosis, nucleic acid metabolism, regulation of protein metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, PPAR signaling pathway and other metabolic-related processes, the down-regulated miRNA target genes were mainly enriched in Toll -like receptor signaling pathway, which was the immune-related process. In previous researches, miRNAs could interact with key genes in metabolism-related pathways, for example, PPAR receptors played a critical role in metabolic disorders, affected glucose and lipid metabolism [44, 45]. The PPAR signaling pathway was enriched by up-regulated miRNA targets in our work, and some researches showed that the PPAR pathway was widely involved in lipid metabolism, immune process and inflammatory response process [46,47,48,49]. Zhao analyzed the expression of more than 200 miRNAs in islets, liver, and adipose tissues of mice, and found that more than half of miRNAs were expressed in the above-mentioned tissues, and there was a significant difference between diabetic mice and normal mice [50], which also confirmed that miRNAs were played an important role in the regulation of the body’s metabolic process. miR-15a was one of the miRNAs who related to metabolism. The overexpression of miR-15a would inhibit the proliferation of pre-adipocytes and increased their size, thereby regulated the lipid metabolism process [51]. The expression level of miR-15a were changed accompanied by insulin synthesis, indicating that miR-15a could affect the glucose metabolism process by regulating the insulin synthesis process [52]. Similarly, miR-20b-5p also played an important role in the metabolic process of chicken. In recent studies, miR-20b-5p overexpression increased basal glycogen synthesis in human skeletal muscle cells, and insulin-stimulated glycogen accumulation by reducing the abundance of AKTIP [53]. In addition, there were reports found that miR-20b-5p promoted myoblast differentiation and repressed myoblast proliferation by directly binding the 3′ UTR of E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) mRNA [54]. Therefore, miR-20b-5p could regulate the growth and development to a certain extent. In this experiment, the expression levels of miR-15a and miR-20b-5p in the treatment group were significantly up-regulated compared to the control group. Therefore, we inferred that the lipid metabolism and glucose metabolism were affected by the infection of SE in Shouguang chickens, and it would also have an impact on growth and development. The results of functional enrichment also involved the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, which was closely related to miR-1662. We speculate that miR-1662 was linked to the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway through its target gene TLR1A. Our previous studies have shown that miR-1662 responds to SE infection in chickens by targeting TLR1A [11]. This phenomenon was consistent with the results of this study. We believed that the immune response was activated after being infected with SE in Shouguang chickens, and miR-1662 played an important role in defending against SE infection. Therefore, we had evidence to prove that the infection of SE could cause the change expression level for miRNAs, which related to immune, metabolic, growth and development, and then regulated the biological process of the body in further.

The interacted regulation of mRNA and miRNA in the response to SE infection in Shouguang chicken

miRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules, which are key players in gene expression regulation [55]. 3′-UTRs of mRNA are primarily targeted by miRNA molecules that form complex gene regulatory networks [56]. Generally, the expression trend of miRNA and its target gene was opposite. In this study, the two groups of mRNA and miRNA with opposite expression trends for function enrichment analysis, that were class I and class II. Toll-like receptor signaling pathway and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway were enriched in class I, which related to the body’s innate immunity. JAK signaling also regulated development and maturation of cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems [57, 58]. The binding of Toll-like receptors with specific adaptor proteins in the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway could promote inflammatory response and active immune response [25, 59, 60]. Herein, the expression of TLR1A was significantly up-regulated, and the expression of miR-1662 was significantly down-regulated. Preliminary studies had shown that TLR1A was targeted by miR-1662, and TLR1A was an important gene in the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. We believed that both the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway play an important role in the regulation of the immune response in Shouguang chickens infected with SE, and the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway might be regulated by down-regulated miR-1662 and up-regulated TLR1A together, which contributed to defend against the infection of SE. The results of functional enrichment analysis of class II group involved metabolic-related and development and growth process, e.g., Wnt signaling pathway, which related to the differentiation of the muscle and adipose tissue cells, and it also affected the development of pancreatic islets [34]. The up-regulated miRNA, miR-15a and miR-20b-5p, both played a role in the development and metabolism of the body. Mainly The glucose metabolism process and the development and differentiation of precursor adipocytes were regulated of miR-15a by inhibiting the formation of insulin [52], and miR-20b-5p promoted hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion by down-regulating CPEB3 [61]. In our research, miR-20b-5p regulate immune or metabolic responses after SE infection in Shouguang chickens by directly targeting SCNN1A The down-regulated genes PGM1 and TCF7L2 was the target gene of miR-15a and miR-20b-5p, respectively, PGM1 (Phosphoglucomutase 1) encoded the metabolic enzyme that interconverts glucose-6-P and glucose-1-P, and it could modulated lipolysis and glycometabolism [62, 63]. TCF7L2 was a key mediator of the evolutionary conserved canonical Wnt signaling pathway, additionally, TCF7L2-mediated and calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells-mediated target genes were involved in insulin synthesis and secretion, insulin degradation, pancreatic beta-cell growth and regeneration, and functional application of pancreatic beta-cells [64,65,66]. Based on the above results, we found that miR-20b-5p was up-regulated and TCF7L2 expression was down-regulated in Shouguang chickens in the treatment group, both of which affected the Wnt signaling pathway and the growth and development process. Similarly, the up-regulation of miR-15a and the down-regulation of the expression of PGM1 hinder the transfer of glucose-6-P and glucose-1-P in the process of glucose metabolism, leading to abnormal metabolic processes in the birds.


In conclusion, the infection of SE shown the changes in the expression of mRNA and miRNA in the cecum tissue of Shouguang chickens. Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway, PPAR signaling pathway, Fatty acid metabolism, glucose metabolism related pathways all played a crucial role in SE infection. PGM1, TCF7L2, SCNN1A, NEK7, miR-15a, miR-20b-5p and miR-1662 were differentially expressed after SE infection. The findings here contribute to the further analysis of the mechanism of mRNA and miRNA defense against SE infection, and provides a theoretical foundation for the molecular disease-resistant breeding of chickens.


The current study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines

All animal procedures were approved by the Shandong Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval Number: # SDAUA-2018-058) and performed in accordance with China animal welfare laws.

Animal inoculation and sample collection

In the current study, Shouguang chicken, a Chinese native breed was used. A total of 70 SE-negative 2 day-old chickens were randomly divided into two groups (40 chicken in treated group, 30 chicken in control group). Chickens in treated and control groups were raised in two separate incubators with the same environmental conditions and free access to sterilized feed and water. The SE (CVCC3377) used for inoculation was provided by the China Veterinary Culture Collection Center ( Each chicken in the treated group was orally inoculated with 0.3 mL of 3.54 × 108 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL SE inoculant. Each chicken in the control group was inoculated with 0.3 mL sterile PBS. On day 3 after inoculation, six chicken in each of treated group and control group were euthanized by cervical dislocation after anesthetized with carbon dioxide (CO2), cecum was collected from each bird, snap frozen and kept in − 80 °C.

Library construction and sequencing

Total RNA from each cecum was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s procedure. The quantity, purity and integrity of total RNA were analyzed using NanoDrop 2000 (Denovix, USA) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, CA, USA) with RIN number > 7.0. mRNA was obtained using poly-T oligo from 1 μg total RNA in each sample. Then the mRNA was fragmented using NEBNext® Magnesium RNA Fragmentation Module (NEB, USA) under 94 °C 5-7 min. Then the cleaved mRNA fragments were reverse-transcribed to create the cDNA library in accordance with the protocol for the RNA-Seq sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The libraries were sequenced using Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform following the manufacturer’s protocol at the Genergy Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Approximately 1 μg of total RNA per sample was used for small RNA library construction according to the protocol of the Illumina small RNA Sample preparation kit. The 5′ adaptors and 3′ adaptors were ligated using T4 RNA ligase. And the 3′ and 5′ adapters-ligated RNA was performed to RT-PCR for amplification. The cDNA fragments located at 145–160 bp were extracted with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and purified via PAGE gel. The enriched cDNA library passed quality control with 2100 Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip and KAPA Quantitative kit (Cat no. KK4602) was sequenced using the Hiseq 2500 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by Genergy Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

RNA-seq data analysis

After removed the low quality bases and undetermined bases, we used HISAT2 software ( to map reads to the UCSC ( chicken reference genome. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled using StringTie ( StringTie and Ballgown ( were used to estimate the expression levels of all transcripts and perform expression level for mRNAs by calculating Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million fragments mapped (FPKM). The differentially expressed mRNAs were selected with the criteria of |log2 (fold change) | ≥ 1 and P < 0.05 using R package edgeR (

miRNA-seq data primary analysis and target genes prediction

Raw reads were subjected to Bowtie tool to remove adapter dimers, junk, low complexity, common RNA families (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA) and repeats. The remaining reads were used to detect known miRNA by comparing with known miRNAs from miRBase. Differentially expression of miRNAs based on normalized counts was analyzed using Student t test. The significance threshold was |log2 (fold change) | ≥ 1 and P < 0.05. Target Scan 7.0 and MiRanda 3.3a were used to predict the target genes of miRNAs, and to identify miRNA binding sites. The overlapped genes predicted by both software were defined as the target genes of miRNA.

Functional enrichment analysis

Functional annotation for mRNA and the predicted miRNA target genes were performed through the WebGestalt [67]. The GO terms and KEGG Pathway [68,69,70] enrichment analyses of the overlapped mRNA and miRNA target genes were performed using DAVID [71], version 6.7. All figures were drew using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 [72].

Verification of differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR

Every total RNA sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA with PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Dalian, China) for mRNA and SYBR™ PrimeScript miRNA RT-PCR Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) for miRNA, respectively. The primers (Table 2) were designed using DNAMAN and synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). SYBR® Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit and SYBR® Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit II (AG, Changsha, China) were used to detect the expression level of mRNA and miRNA. β-actin and U6 were used as the housekeeping genes. The qRT-PCR performed using the Roche LightCycler®96 (Roche Diagnostics, Shanghai, China). The data were analyzed using the general linear model procedure of SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Table 2 Primer sequences and the length of PCR products

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

SCNN1A and miR-20b-5p were selected for targeting relationship in chicken fibroblasts DF1 by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. The wild type vector psiCHECK2-SCNN1A-3’UTR-Wild and the mutant vector psiCHECK2-SCNN1A-3’UTR-Mut, were synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China), and miR-20b-5p mimic/negative control (NC) was synthesized by Jiangsu Saisuofei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuxi, China). In 24-well plates, DF1 cells were cultured to approximately 70% confluence and then co-transfected with either wild type or mutant luciferase reporter vector and either mimic miRNAs or NC with Lipofectamine® LTX and Plus™ Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 48 h, luciferase activity was measured using Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System Kit (Promega, USA) and normalized to the activity of renilla luciferase.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequence data of RNA-seq and miRNA-seq have been submitted to the NCGC Genome Sequence Archive with accession number CRA006250 (



Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis




Phosphate buffer saline


Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million fragments mapped


Gene Ontology


Biological process


Molecular function


Cellular component


Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes


Negative control


  1. Duquet A, Melotti A, Mishra S, Malerba M, Seth C, Conod A, et al. A novel genome-wide in vivo screen for metastatic suppressors in human colon cancer identifies the positive WNT-TCF pathway modulators TMED3 and SOX12. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(7):882–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskerville A, Humphrey TJ, Fitzgeorge RB, Cook RW, Chart H, Rowe B, et al. Airborne infection of laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. Vet Rec. 1992;130(18):395–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Afshari A, Baratpour A, Khanzade S, Jamshidi A. Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimorium identification in poultry carcasses. Iran J Microbiol. 2018;10(1):45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xin Y, Hongwei Z, Yongheng B, Youzhi L, Yue Z, Yang L, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from broiler chickens in Shandong Province, China, 2013–2018. Poult Sci. 2021;100(2):1016–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yao M, Gao W, Tao H, Yang J, Liu G, Huang T. Regulation signature of miR-143 and miR-26 in porcine Salmonella infection identified by binding site enrichment analysis. Mol Gen Genomics. 2016;291(2):789–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Samiullah CKK, Roberts JR, Sexton M, May D, Kiermeier A. Effects of egg shell quality and washing on Salmonella Infantis penetration. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;165(2):77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lockhart DJ, Winzeler EA. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature. 2000;405(6788):827–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun H, Sun J, Li M, Qian L, Zhang L, Huang Z, et al. Transcriptome analysis of immune receptor activation and energy metabolism reduction as the underlying mechanisms in interleukin-6-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:730070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Goor A, Ashwell CM, Persia ME, Rothschild MF, Schmidt CJ, Lamont SJ. Unique genetic responses revealed in RNA-seq of the spleen of chickens stimulated with lipopolysaccharide and short-term heat. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smits K, Coninck DIMD, Nieuwerburgh FV, Govaere J, Poucke MV, Peelman L, et al. The equine embryo influences immune-related gene expression in the oviduct1. Biol Reprod. 2016;94(2):36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu G, Qi Y, Liu X, Yang N, Xu G, Liu L, et al. Cecal microRNAome response to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection in white leghorn layer. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perlas A, Argilaguet J, Bertran K, Sanchez-Gonzalez R, Nofrarias M, Valle R, et al. Dual host and pathogen RNA-seq analysis unravels chicken genes potentially involved in resistance to highly pathogenic avian influenza virus infection. Front Immunol. 2021;12:800188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Asfor AS, Nazki S, Reddy V, Campbell E, Dulwich KL, Giotis ES, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of inbred chicken lines reveals infectious bursal disease severity is associated with greater bursal inflammation in vivo and more rapid induction of pro-inflammatory responses in primary bursal cells stimulated ex vivo. Viruses. 2021;13(5):933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matulova M, Varmuzova K, Sisak F, Havlickova H, Rychlik I. Chicken innate immune response to oral infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vet Res. 2013;44(1):37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Z, Ding L, Bao J, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wang J, et al. Co-infection of mycoplasma gallisepticum and Escherichia coli triggers inflammatory injury involving the IL-17 signaling pathway. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma T, Nagy A, Xu G, Xin L, Bao D, Lu C, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of influenza a virus-induced transcriptional changes in mice lung and its possible implications for the virus pathogenicity in mice. Viruses. 2021;13(10):2031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berezikov E. Evolution of microRNA diversity and regulation in animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12):846–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):522–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts JA, Sockett PN. The socio-economic impact of human Salmonella enteritidis infection. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994;21(1–2):117–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hou Z, Zhang H, Xu K, Zhu S, Wang L, Su D, et al. Cluster analysis of splenocyte microRNAs in the pig reveals key signal regulators of immunomodulation in the host during acute and chronic toxoplasma gondii infection. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15(1):58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pashangzadeh S, Motallebnezhad M, Vafashoar F, Khalvandi A, Mojtabavi N. Implications the role of miR-155 in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12:669382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li G, Wu Z, Li X, Ning X, Li Y, Yang G. Biological role of microRNA-103 based on expression profile and target genes analysis in pigs. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(7):4777–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herrera BM, Lockstone HE, Taylor JM, Wills QF, Kaisaki PJ, Barrett A, et al. MicroRNA-125a is over-expressed in insulin target tissues in a spontaneous rat model of type 2 diabetes. BMC Med Genet. 2009;2(8):54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haas BJ, Zody MC. Advancing RNA-Seq analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):421–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Temperley ND, Berlin S, Paton IR, Griffin DK, Burt DW. Evolution of the chicken toll-like receptor gene family: a story of gene gain and gene loss. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science. 2010;327(5963):291–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berghof TVL, Visker M, Arts JAJ, Parmentier HK, van der Poel JJ, Vereijken ALJ, et al. Genomic region containing toll-like receptor genes has a major impact on total IgM antibodies including KLH-binding IgM natural antibodies in chickens. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang Y, Temperley ND, Ren L, Smith J, Li N, Burt DW. Molecular evolution of the vertebrate TLR1 gene family--a complex history of gene duplication, gene conversion, positive selection and co-evolution. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nihashi Y, Ono T, Kagami H, Takaya T. Toll-like receptor ligand-dependent inflammatory responses in chick skeletal muscle myoblasts. Dev Comp Immunol. 2019;91:115–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramasamy KT, Reddy MR, Verma PC, Murugesan S. Expression analysis of Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) toll-like receptors and molecular characterization of avian specific TLR15. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(8):8539–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Velova H, Gutowska-Ding MW, Burt DW, Vinkler M. Toll-like receptor evolution in birds: gene duplication, pseudogenization, and diversifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(9):2170–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang J, Zhou M, Zhong Y, Xu L, Zeng C, Zhao X, et al. Gene duplication and adaptive evolution of toll-like receptor genes in birds. Dev Comp Immunol. 2021;119:103990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mitra T, Bramberger B, Bilic I, Hess M, Liebhart D. Vaccination against the protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis primes the activation of toll-like receptors in turkeys and chickens determined by a set of newly developed multiplex RT-qPCRs. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(9):960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shitashige M, Hirohashi S, Yamada T. Wnt signaling inside the nucleus. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(4):631–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen X, Ayala I, Shannon C, Fourcaudot M, Acharya NK, Jenkinson CP, et al. The diabetes gene and Wnt pathway effector TCF7L2 regulates adipocyte development and function. Diabetes. 2018;67(4):554–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ip W, Shao W, Chiang YT, Jin T. The Wnt signaling pathway effector TCF7L2 is upregulated by insulin and represses hepatic gluconeogenesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303(9):E1166–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jin GZ, Zhang Y, Cong WM, Wu X, Wang X, Wu S, et al. Phosphoglucomutase 1 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating glucose trafficking. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(10):e2006483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abu BN, Voermans NC, Marquardt T, Thiel C, Janssen MCH, Hansikova H, et al. Intact transferrin and total plasma glycoprofiling for diagnosis and therapy monitoring in phosphoglucomutase-I deficiency. Transl Res. 2018;199:62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun GR, Li M, Li GX, Tian YD, Han RL, Kang XT. Identification and abundance of miRNA in chicken hypothalamus tissue determined by Solexa sequencing. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11(4):4682–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cui Q, Yu Z, Purisima EO, Wang E. Principles of microRNA regulation of a human cellular signaling network. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nielsen M, Hansen JH, Hedegaard J, Nielsen RO, Panitz F, Bendixen C, et al. MicroRNA identity and abundance in porcine skeletal muscles determined by deep sequencing. Anim Genet. 2010;41(2):159–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Y, Zhang M, Shan Y, Ji G, Ju X, Tu Y, et al. miRNA-mRNA network regulation in the skeletal muscle fiber phenotype of chickens revealed by integrated analysis of miRNAome and transcriptome. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang J, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhao D, Han K, Zhang L, et al. Analysis of the microRNA expression profiles of chicken dendritic cells in response to H9N2 avian influenza virus infection. Vet Res. 2020;51(1):132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ammazzalorso A, Maccallini C, Amoia P, Amoroso R. Multitarget PPARgamma agonists as innovative modulators of the metabolic syndrome. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;173:261–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Takanabe R, Ono K, Abe Y, Takaya T, Horie T, Wada H, et al. Up-regulated expression of microRNA-143 in association with obesity in adipose tissue of mice fed high-fat diet. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376(4):728–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi S.H., Chung S.S. and Park K.S. Re-highlighting the action of PPARgamma in treating metabolic diseases. F1000Res. 2018; 7 F1000 Faculty Rev-1127.

  47. Gilardi F, Winkler C, Quignodon L, Diserens JG, Toffoli B, Schiffrin M, et al. Systemic PPARgamma deletion in mice provokes lipoatrophy, organomegaly, severe type 2 diabetes and metabolic inflexibility. Metabolism. 2019;95:8–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Li R, Xu X, Chen C, Wang Y, Gruzdev A, Zeldin DC, et al. CYP2J2 attenuates metabolic dysfunction in diabetic mice by reducing hepatic inflammation via the PPARgamma. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;308(4):E270–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lyu Z, Mao Z, Li Q, Xia Y, Liu Y, He Q, et al. PPARgamma maintains the metabolic heterogeneity and homeostasis of renal tubules. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:178–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao E, Keller MP, Rabaglia ME, Oler AT, Stapleton DS, Schueler KL, et al. Obesity and genetics regulate microRNAs in islets, liver, and adipose of diabetic mice. Mamm Genome. 2009;20(8):476–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Andersen DC, Jensen CH, Schneider M, Nossent AY, Eskildsen T, Hansen JL, et al. MicroRNA-15a fine-tunes the level of Delta-like 1 homolog (DLK1) in proliferating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(10):1681–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun LL, Jiang BG, Li WT, Zou JJ, Shi YQ, Liu ZM. MicroRNA-15a positively regulates insulin synthesis by inhibiting uncoupling protein-2 expression. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91(1):94–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Katayama M, Wiklander OPB, Fritz T, Caidahl K, El-Andaloussi S, Zierath JR, et al. Circulating exosomal miR-20b-5p is elevated in type 2 diabetes and could impair insulin action in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2019;68(3):515–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Luo W, Li G, Yi Z, Nie Q, Zhang X. E2F1-miR-20a-5p/20b-5p auto-regulatory feedback loop involved in myoblast proliferation and differentiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Duarte I, Carraco G, de Azevedo NTD, Benes V, Andrade RP. Gga-miRNOME, a microRNA-sequencing dataset from chick embryonic tissues. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bug DS, Tishkov AV, Moiseev IS, Petukhova NV. Evaluating the effect of 3′-UTR variants in DICER1 and DROSHA on their tissue-specific expression by miRNA target prediction. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;43(2):605–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo Y, Alexander M, Gadina M, O'Shea JJ, Meylan F, Schwartz DM. JAK-STAT signaling in human disease: from genetic syndromes to clinical inhibition. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(4):911–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. McInnes IB, Szekanecz Z, McGonagle D, Maksymowych WP, Pfeil A, Lippe R, et al. A review of JAK-STAT signalling in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis and the role of JAK inhibition. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;61(5):1783–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang S, Liu P, et al. Corilagin ameliorates atherosclerosis in peripheral artery disease via the toll-like receptor-4 signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Saikh KU, Ranji CM. Cells stimulated with more than one toll-like receptor-ligand in the presence of a MyD88 inhibitor augmented interferon-beta via MyD88-independent signaling pathway. Viral Immunol. 2021;34(9):646–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Li Z, Wu L, Tan W, Zhang K, Lin Q, Zhu J, et al. MiR-20b-5p promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation, migration and invasion by down-regulating CPEB3. Ann Hepatol. 2021;23:100345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Radenkovic S, Bird MJ, Emmerzaal TL, Wong SY, Felgueira C, Stiers KM, et al. The metabolic map into the pathomechanism and treatment of PGM1-CDG. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(5):835–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang HM, Xia HL, Jiang HR, Mao YJ, Qu KX, Huang BZ, et al. Longissimus dorsi muscle transcriptomic analysis of Yunling and Chinese simmental cattle differing in intramuscular fat content and fatty acid composition. Genome. 2018;61(8):549–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Abou AF, Lim GE. Metabolic contributions of Wnt signaling: more than controlling flight. Front cell. Dev Biol. 2021;9:709823.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chen J, Ning C, Mu J, Li D, Ma Y, Meng X. Role of Wnt signaling pathways in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Biochem. 2021;476(5):2219–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Dias C, Pfundt R, Kleefstra T, Shuurs-Hoeijmakers J, Boon EMJ, van Hagen JM, et al. Novo variants in TCF7L2 are associated with a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185(8):2384–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mathilakathu A, Borchert S, Wessolly M, Mairinger E, Beckert H, Steinborn J, et al. Mitogen signal-associated pathways, energy metabolism regulation, and mediation of tumor immunogenicity play essential roles in the cellular response of malignant pleural mesotheliomas to platinum-based treatment: a retrospective study. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(7):3030–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Clement JG, Winship V, Ceddia J, Al-Amad S, Morales A, Hill AJ. New software for computer-assisted dental-data matching in disaster victim identification and long-term missing persons investigations: "DAVID web". Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Berkman SJ, Roscoe EM, Bourret JC. Comparing self-directed methods for training staff to create graphs using Graphpad prism. J Appl Behav Anal. 2019;52(1):188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the colleagues in our laboratory, Yan-Ru Ren, Hong-Wei Zhang, Qing-Wei Zhang, Xiao-Yun Song, Zhi-Hao Xu for their assistance in experiment.


Research supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2018MC026), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872343), Shandong Province Agricultural Seed Project (2017LZN007), Shandong Modern Agricultural Industry & Technology System (SDAIT-11-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



X L and L L2 planned and designed the research and experiments. J Y provided Shouguang chickens. X M, G H, Y Z and G W undertook the field work and processing of samples. X M, L L1 and Y W performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianyao Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were approved by the Shandong Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval Number: # SDAUA-2018-058) and performed in accordance with China animal welfare laws. All methods were reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines ( for the reporting of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miao, X., Liu, L., Liu, L. et al. Regulation of mRNA and miRNA in the response to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection in chicken cecum. BMC Vet Res 18, 437 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: