Skip to main content

Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibilities and risk factors of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in dairy bovines


Staphylococcus aureus is a common mastitis pathogen in dairy cows, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has been found in dairy farms all over the world. The study carried out on bovines from three governorates in Egypt, with the goal of determining the prevalence of MRSA in positive milk samples of subclinical mastitis, performing an antibiotic susceptibility test against MRSA isolates and determining the risk factors associated with MRSA. A total of 350 quarter milk samples (n = 200 mixed breed cow; n = 150 water buffalo) were collected and examined for subclinical mastitis using the California mastitis test (CMT) before being exposed to standard microbiological procedures for S. aureus isolation. The disc diffusion method was used to phenotypically analyse the positive S. aureus isolates for MRSA, which was verified by a PCR assay targeting the mecA gene. According to the findings of the study, 41.4% (145/350) milk samples were positive based on CMT, while 35.7% (125/350) of positive samples identified as MRSA based on PCR assay. However, the obtained results revealed non-significant disparity between cattle and buffalo and all predicted risk factors were strongly associated with prevalence of subclinical mastitis. The in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility test revealed that cefoxitin was completely resistant, whereas linezolid, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole were sensitive against the MRSA isolates. The relevance of S. aureus to public health, as well as the development of resistance to antibiotics like methicillin, needs ongoing testing of antimicrobial medications against MRSA isolates.

Peer Review reports


Mastitis is a serious disease that affects bovines all over the world, resulting in significant economic losses due to intramammary infection in lactating animals [1, 2]. The dairy industry in Egypt is constantly exposed to a variety of health risks, the most common of which is mastitis, which is a major concern and risk factor in the sector’s development. It causes lower in milk output, milk condemnation, animal replacement, culling, and a drop in quarter-wise productivity [3, 4]. Overall, the frequency of mastitis pathogens varies greatly between herds and locations. Environmental Streptococci and Coliform bacteria appear to be the most prevalent pathogens causing clinical mastitis, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Despite the fact that treatment efforts are frequently limited, S. aureus infections are difficult to control and are well-known for generating subclinical, clinical, and chronic mastitis [5]. S. aureus has gained multidrug resistance, making it easier for it to infiltrate the immune system of the host [6]. Penicillin was thought to be effective against a wide range of staphylococcal infections, but by the mid-1940s, it had begun to develop resistance to S. aureus strains. Consequently, methicillin drugs (β-lactams antibiotics) have been developed, which are regarded effective against penicillin-resistant S. aureus. However, a mecA gene mediates the resistance of methicillin. This gene is found on a mobile genetic element called ‘‘Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec’’ (SCCmec). The gene produces an altered penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a). PBP2a has a weaker affinity for β-lactam antimicrobials than PBP. Accordingly, most of β-lactam antibiotics are ineffective against mecA /mecC positive staphylococci.

In Egypt, the unrestrained and massive use of antibiotics (particularly penicillin groups) for the treatment of bovines has resulted in the establishment of resistant S. aureus strains. S. aureus’ methicillin resistance has a negative impact on the treatment of both animal and human diseases [7,8,9,10].

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was more common in the United States than in Europe [11]. According to various studies, prevalence rates in South Korea and Vietnam were over 70%, while prevalence rates in Portugal, Greece, and Italy were less than 50% [12]. According to a studies conducted in Egypt, the prevalence of S. aureus was 17.2% while 70–73% S. aureus strains obtained from a variety of foods were resistant to β-lactam antibiotics including penicillin and ampicillin [13]. Furthermore, bovines in the governorates of Dekahlia and Ismalia were found to have a high incidence of S. aureus strains isolated from subclinical mastitis and resistant to penicillin and cefoxitin [7, 14]. However, there have been few studies on the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in dairy animals in Egypt, particularly in the study areas of the present study.

Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of subclinical mastitis, as well as MRSA, in relation to potential risk factors in some Egyptian governorates.

Materials and methods

Study area

The research was carried out in three governorates in northern Egypt in 2021: Beheira, Kafr ElSheikh, and Menofia. Geographically, these governorates are located at 30.61°N 30.43°E, 31°06′42′′N 30°56′45′′E, and 30.52°N 30.99°E, respectively. Egypt is mostly characterised by a hot desert environment (Köppen climate classification BWh). The yearly rainfall in the study region ranges from 200 to 400 mm, with a mean annual temperature of 25 °C. The study area’s agricultural production system is a mixed crop and livestock farming system.


The sample size was determined using Thrusfield’s formula [15], with a 95% confidence interval, a absolute precision of 5%, and a 50% predicted prevalence. A total of 350 dairy animals (200 mixed breed cattle and 150 water buffalo) raised by individual farmers, all of which appeared to be healthy, were chosen at random from the studied regions. Following the initial screening of subclinical mastitis (SCM) with the California Mastitis Test (CMT), milk samples were collected [16]. A total of 350 quarter milk samples (2 mL) were obtained from CMT positive cases and forwarded to Benha University’s Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory in icebox for further analysis. A pre-defined questionnaire was used to collect information about risk factors such as species, age, hand washing between milking, parity, lactation stage, teat dipping, and mastitis history.

Bacteriological examination

All of the milk samples (0.01 mL) were cultured on blood agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. To confirm S. aureus, the bacterial colonies were streaked to Mannitol salt agar (Merck, Germany) and biochemically identified using Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology’s recommended techniques [17]. Moreover, microscopy, Gram staining, and biochemical tests such as coagulase, catalase, and mannitol fermentation were used to investigate the presence of S. aureus [18].

Phenotypic identification of MRSA and in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility test

To identify MRSA, 1 µg of oxacillin was applied to activate growth of S. aureus (0.5 McFarland) on Muller Hinton agar plates. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Vernier callipers were used to assess growth inhibition zones around antibiotic discs in comparison to standard zones as defined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute [19]. MRSA were defined as isolates resistant to oxacillin discs. According to the standard approach, antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [20]. The in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of MRSA to different antibiotics which was choose based on common antimicrobial treatments used in this region such as oxytetracycline (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), penicillin G (10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), linezolid (30 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), tylosin (30 μg), and trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole (1.25 μg, 23.75 μg) was performed by putting antibiotic discs on Mueller Hinton agar streaked with activated MRSA growth of 1 × 108 CFU/ml and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Vernier callipers were used to measure the growth inhibition zones surrounding the antibiotic discs, which were compared to CLSI 2020 criteria. The results were classified into three categories: sensitive, moderate, and resistant.

Molecular detection of mecA gene

The mecA gene was confirmed by PCR in confirmed S. aureus samples that were resistant to oxacillin. The DNA was extracted using QIAamp DNA Mini (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extracted DNA was examined using PCR assay targeting mecA gene with primers P1:5′-TGGCATTCGTGTCACAATCG-3′ and P2: 5′- CTGGAACTTGTTGAGCAGAG-3′ which amplify product of 310 bp, as described by Galdiero, et al. [21]. Identified S. aureus strain obtained from animal health research institute, Cairo was used as mecA positive control. The methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were confirmed by PCR assay in cattle (n = 73) and buffalo (n = 52).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 24 was used for the statistical analysis (SPSS Inc., Chicago, U.S.A.). The chi square test was used to assess the risk factors’ associations with the prevalence of SCM in a univariate analysis. Potential risk factors with a P value less than 0.2 were re-entered into the final model using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Risk variables with a P value of < 0.05 were determined to have a statistically significant link with positivity to SCM, and their confidence intervals (95% CI) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated.


The CMT found an overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis in bovines from the study areas of 41.4% (145/350). Cattle had a prevalence of 40.5% (81/200) versus 42.7% (64/150) in buffaloes. Moreover, the highest prevalence was observed in Kafr ElSheikh governorate in comparison with other localities, and it was 45.7% and 47.3% for cattle and buffalo, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in different localities

The resistance of S. aureus isolates to oxacillin was confirmed by PCR assay targeting the mecA gene. In the current study, MRSA was observed in 35.7% (125/350) of bovine milk from the governorates under the study.

Antibiotic sensitivity tests revealed that ciprofloxacin, and linezolid had 100% efficacy, levofloxacin had 85% efficacy, amikacin and trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole had 80% efficacy, while tylosine, gentamicin, and oxytetracyline had 60%, 60%, and 40% efficacy against MRSA found in buffalo milk, respectively. Contrary, all MRSA isolates were resistant to cefoxitin. With a few exceptions, the efficacy of amikacin and trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole was higher against MRSA isolates from cattle milk than that of buffalo milk, Table 2.

Table 2 Results of antimicrobial sensitivity test against Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in animals of median age group (> 4–8 years), particularly in animals in more than 4th parity. Moreover, hygienic risk factors like hand washing between milking and teat dipping is significantly associated with prevalence of SCM. The lactation stage and history of previous mastitis were found significant predictor for occurrence of the disease, Table 3.

Table 3 Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in relation to different variables

A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate variables associated with the prevalence of SCM that were found in the univariate study. When compared to other animals, the risk of contracting the disease was shown to be 2.51, 2,65, 2,71, and 2.93 times higher in animals of median age (> 4–8 years), more than 4th parity, in lactation stage more than 120 days, and with a history of mastitis.Interestingly, the odds of disease were observed 6.56 and 4.86 times in absence of application of hand washing between milking and absence of teat dipping more than in case of application of hand washing or teat dipping, Table 4.

Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with subclinical mastitis


The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus increased dramatically due to overuse of antibiotics, making treatment of clinical cases extremely difficult. Drug-resistant bacteria have arisen as a major public health concern, as these diseases can be transmitted to humans via animal byproducts [6, 22, 23].

In the present study, the overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis is directly in line with previous findings of Javed, et al. [24], it was 41.4% (145/350). Additionally, the prevalence of SCM was 40.5% and 42.6% in cattle and buffalo, respectively, which was higher in comparison to reported prevalence rate by Javed, et al. [24] in cattle and buffalo living in Pakistan.

The prevalence rate of MRSA was 35.7% (125/350) in the PCR assay targeting the mecA gene, which agrees with the findings of Aqib, et al. [25] and Abo-Shama [26], who identified 34% and 40% MRSA in bovine milk, respectively. However, the prevalence of MRSA was found to be lower in Michigan (0.6%) [27], Wisconsin (1.8%) [28], Germany (16.7%) [29], Korea (6.3%) [30], and India (13.1%) [31]. In terms of estimating MRSA prevalence, there are some inconsistencies. The lower prevalence of MRSA could be due to insufficient expression of the mecA gene or overproduction of beta-lactamase, which leads to disparity of diagnosis [32]. Moreover, the pH and osmolality of culture media, on the other hand, can affect phenotypic expression and the higher variety in MRSA strains can be a reason of diagnostic difficulty [33, 34].

In accordance with previous results of Javed, et al. [24] and Aqib, et al. [25], they observed all of MRSA strains are 100% sensitive to ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and linezolid but 100% resistant to cefoxitin. The current study’s findings on linezolid sensitivity and resistance to cefoxitin were similarly consistent with previous findings [35]. Also, the findings come in agreement with previous reports in Egypt, where most of S. auraus isolates are resist to oxytetracycline and cefoxitin [7, 14]. The results of this investigation contradicted those of Umaru, et al. [36], who found that 10% and 5% of MRSA isolates were resistant to sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and amikacin, respectively, while the findings of both studies were consistent in that ciprofloxacin was found to be sensitive against all isolates. However, no MRSA isolates from buffalo or cattle milk were found to be cefoxitin sensitive, which is consistent with Nemeghaire, et al. [35], who reported 100% resistance of MRSA isolates to cefoxitin.

From the results, it is clear that the prevalence of S. aureus increased significantly with age and number of parity. These findings are in accordance with findings of Elemo, et al. [37], who observed higher prevalence of S. aureus infection among older cattle with high number of calving. This could be due to pathogenic organisms being more susceptible in udders with relaxed sphincter muscles and the defence mechanisms of primiparous cows are more effective than those of multiparous cows [27].

Interestingly, unhygienic hands of milker are a possible source for disseminating of contagious pathogens during milking practices; these findings are consistent with prior findings [25].

The present findings found that the incidence of S. aureus varied greatly depending on the stage of lactation. When compared to early lactation, late lactation had a substantial effect on the prevalence of S. aureus. A similar conclusion was obtained by Abera, et al. [38] and Elemo, et al. [37]. These results could be attributable to chronic nature of mastitis, which is usually subclinical and more common in late stage of lactation. Moreover, S. aureus is the most common cause of subclinical mastitis [39].

Furthermore, in line of previous results of Abera, et al. [40], it can be concluded that animals having a history of mastitis exhibited a greater prevalence of S. aureus than animals without a history of mastitis. The obtained finding suggests that treating animals for mastitis may not be efficient in eliminating pathogens and those pathogens may be passed along from one lactation to the next.

The present results confirmed that teat dipping had significant effect on prevalence of S. aureus, which was consistent with research reported that washing of udder before milking reduce the spreading of S. aureusin lactating bovines [41, 42].


The methicillin resistant S. aureus was prevalent in buffalo and cattle from all studied governorates, Egypt. The prevalence of S. aureus in lactating bovines was significantly associated with age, washing of hands between milking, number of parity and lactation, teat dipping and history of previous mastitis. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin, linezolid, and trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole were found to be effective against MRSA isolates from cattle and buffalo in vitro. MRSA prevalence can be reduced through regular investigation and treatment protocols, proper surveillance, and the implementation of appropriate control measures.

Availability of data and materials

All data that were generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. Romero J, Benavides E, Meza C. Assessing financial impacts of subclinical mastitis on Colombian dairy farms. Front Vet Sci. 2018;273:273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elhaig MM, Selim A. Molecular and bacteriological investigation of subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae in domestic bovids from Ismailia Egypt. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015;47:271–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harmon RJ, Reneau JK. National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2001.

  4. Gonçalves J, et al. Bovine subclinical mastitis reduces milk yield and economic return. Livest Sci. 2018;210:25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li T, et al. Molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus causing bovine mastitis between 2014 and 2015. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:127.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Altaf M, et al. Molecular Characterization of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Associated Risk Factors with the Occurrence of Goat Mastitis. Pak Vet J. 2020;40:1–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Algammal AM, Enany ME, El-Tarabili RM, Ghobashy MO, Helmy YA. Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance profiles, virulence and enterotoxins-determinant genes of MRSA isolated from subclinical bovine mastitis in Egypt. Pathogens. 2020;9:362.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Selim A, Elhaig M, Taha S, Nasr E. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against field and reference strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis and multiple-drug-resistant tuberculosis strains. Rev Sci Tech OIE. 2018;37:823–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Selim A, Attia KA, Alsubki RA, Kimiko I, Sayed-Ahmed MZ. Cross-sectional survey on Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis in dromedary camels: seroprevalence and risk factors. Acta Tropica. 2022;226:106261.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selim A, Ali A-F, Ramadan E. Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Johne’s disease in Egyptian cattle. Acta Trop. 2019;195:1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dulon M, Peters C, Schablon A, Nienhaus A. MRSA carriage among healthcare workers in non-outbreak settings in Europe and the United States: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chukwunonso E, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a mini review. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2018;7:122–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beyene T, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus in dairy farms, abattoir and humans in Addis Ababa Ethiopia. Bmc Res Notes. 2017;10:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Ashker M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance pattern and virulence profile of S. aureus isolated from household cattle and buffalo with mastitis in Egypt. Vet Microbiol. 2020;240:108535.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thrusfield M. Veterinary epidemiology. England: Wiley; 2018.

  16. Radostits OM, Gay C, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. Vet Med. 2007;10:2045–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bergey, David Hendricks. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1994.

  18. Boerlin P, Kuhnert P, Hussy D, Schaellibaum M. Methods for identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in cases of bovine mastitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:767–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wayne P. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2010. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2010;20:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biemer JJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1973;3:135–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galdiero E, Liguori G, D’Isanto M, Damiano N, Sommese L. Distribution of mecA among methicillin-resistant clinical staphylococcal strains isolated at hospitals in Naples Italy. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:139–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Caruso M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in sheep and goat bulk tank milk from Southern Italy. Small Rumin Res. 2016;135:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Selim A, El-Haig M, Galila ES, Gaede W. Direct detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in bovine milk by multiplex Real-time PCR. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 2013;31:291–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Javed MU, et al. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin and vancomycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from Bovine Milk. Pak Vet J. 2021;41:463–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aqib AI, et al. Antibiotic susceptibilities and prevalence of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from bovine milk in Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2017;176:168–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abo-Shama U. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus isolated from cattle, buffalo, sheep and goats raws milk in Sohag Governorate Egypt. Assiut Vet Med J. 2014;60:63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erskine R, Walker R, Bolin C, Bartlett P, White D. Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:1111–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Makovec JA, Ruegg PL. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from dairy cow milk samples submitted for bacterial culture: 8,905 samples (1994–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:1582–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spohr M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in three dairy herds in southwest Germany. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:252–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lim S-K, et al. Transmission and persistence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in milk, environment, and workers in dairy cattle farms. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:731–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar R, Yadav B, Singh R. Antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity factors in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from mastitic Sahiwal cattle. J Biosci. 2011;36:175–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turutoglu H, Hasoksuz M, Ozturk D, Yildirim M, Sagnak S. Methicillin and aminoglycoside resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis and sequence analysis of their mecA genes. Vet Res Commun. 2009;33:945–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haran K, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from bulk tank milk from Minnesota dairy farms. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:688–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar R, Yadav B, Singh R. Genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from milk of mastitic crossbred cattle. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60:379–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nemeghaire S, Argudín M, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusnasal carriage isolates from bovines. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Umaru GA, Kabir J, Umoh VJ, Bello M, Kwaga J. Occurrence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in fresh and fermented milk in Nigeria: a preliminary report. Int J Public Health and Epidemiol. 2014;3:054–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Elemo KK, Sisay T, Shiferaw A, Fato MA. Prevalence, risk factors and multidrug resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in selected dairy farms in and around Asella town, Arsi Zone, South Eastern Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2017;11:1632–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abera M, Demie B, Aragaw K, Regassa F, Regassa A. Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitic milk and their drug resistance patterns in Adama town, Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Health. 2010;2:29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Garedew L, Melese B, Tesfaye R. Staphylococcus aureus in mastitic crossbreed cows and its associated risk factors in Addis Ababa City Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J. 2015;19:107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abera M, et al. Major causes of mastitis and associated risk factors in smallholder dairy cows in Shashemene, southern Ethiopia. Afr J Agric Res. 2012;7:3513–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yohannis M, Molla W. Prevalence, risk factors and major bacterial causes of bovine mastitis in and around Wolaita Sodo, Southern Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7:5400–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Radostits O, Blood D, Gay C, Hinchiff K, Handerson J. Veterinary medicine. 9th ed. London: Bailliere & Tindall Publication, Ltd.; 2000. p. 1450–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors extend their appreciation to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project Number (PNURSP2022R20), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Human and human data

Not applicable.


Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This work funding by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project Number (PNURSP2022R20).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing-original draft preparation, A.S., K.K., M.A., F.A. and K.A.; writing-review and editing, A.S., K.K., M.A., F.A. and K.A.; project administration, A.S., K..K. and K.A.; funding acquisition, A.S., K.K. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelfattah Selim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures and handling were carried out in accordance with current standards and regulations and approved by an ethics committee at Benha University’s Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. The owners consented to the collection of the samples after being fully informed. When conducting this study, the ARRIVE guidelines were followed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selim, A., Kelis, K., AlKahtani, M.D.F. et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibilities and risk factors of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in dairy bovines. BMC Vet Res 18, 293 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  • Bovines
  • Phenotypically
  • Antibiotic susceptibility test
  • Risk factors
  • Egypt