Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of a broad-spectrum lytic Myoviridae bacteriophage using multidrug resistant Salmonella isolates from pig slaughterhouses as the indicator and its application in combating Salmonella infections

BMC Veterinary Research volume 18, Article number: 270 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Salmonella is a leading foodborne and zoonotic pathogen, and is widely distributed in different nodes of the pork supply chain. In recent years, the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella poses a threat to global public health. The purpose of this study is to the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in pig slaughterhouses in Hubei Province in China, and explore the effect of using lytic bacteriophages fighting against antimicrobial resistant Salmonella.

Results

We collected a total of 1289 samples including anal swabs of pigs (862/1289), environmental swabs (204/1289), carcass surface swabs (36/1289) and environmental agar plates (187/1289) from eleven slaughterhouses in seven cities in Hubei Province and recovered 106 Salmonella isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that these isolates showed a high rate of antimicrobial resistance; over 99.06% (105/106) of them were multidrug resistant. To combat these drug resistant Salmonella, we isolated 37 lytic phages using 106 isolates as indicator bacteria. One of them, designated ph 2–2, which belonged to the Myoviridae family, displayed good capacity to kill Salmonella under different adverse conditions (exposure to different temperatures, pHs, UV, and/or 75% ethanol) and had a wide lytic spectrum. Evaluation in mouse models showed that ph 2–2 was safe and saved 80% (administrated by gavage) and 100% (administrated through intraperitoneal injection) mice from infections caused by Salmonella Typhimurium.

Conclusions

The data presented herein demonstrated that Salmonella contamination remains a problem in some pig slaughter houses in China and Salmonella isolates recovered in slaughter houses displayed a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, broad-spectrum lytic bacteriophages may represent a good candidate for the development of anti-antimicrobial resistant Salmonella agents.

Peer Review reports

Background

Salmonella is a leading cause of diarrhea and an important foodborne pathogen. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates Salmonella bacteria cause about 1.35 million infections, 26,500 hospitalizations, and 420 deaths in the United States every year [1]. In China, a laboratory-based surveillance revealed 3% (n = 662) of Salmonella enterica infections in 23,140 stool specimens in 126 hospitals in 44 cities and counties from eight provinces [2]. Another analysis on 29,210 diarrheal patients in the outpatient department of a hospital in China between 1998 and 2013 has identified Salmonella as the third-most frequent cause of diarrhea from 1998 to 2006, as the second-most frequent cause from 2006 to 2010, and as the most frequent cause from 2011 to 2013 [3]. To date, more than 2500 serovars have been described for Salmonella, but only less than 100 serotypes account for most infections in humans [4]. Of particular note is serovar Typhimurium, which is responsible for the majority of Salmonella infection cases worldwide [5]. Ecologically, Salmonella bacteria are widely distributed in animals, particularly in food animals such as poultry, pigs, and cattle, and the inhabitant environment of humans and animals [6]. Investigation of contaminated food and drinking water has been recognized as a main reason for Salmonella infections in humans [1].

The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) condition of Salmonella has also raised a global concern in recent years [7]. Over the past few decades, the prevalence of antibiotic resistant Salmonella has increased in many regions of the world, including the developed world such as Australia, the United States, and the European Union [7, 8]. The rapid emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistant Salmonella, in particular those resistance to the last-resort antibiotics such as colistin, carbapenems, and/or tigecycline, may raise the difficulty of treatment or lead to the treatment failure in both human and veterinary medicine [9,10,11]. From this point, seeking alternative options combating against antibiotic resistant Salmonella is important and necessary. Since their discovery in 1915, lytic bacteriophages (or phages) have been proposed as promising therapeutic tools for infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria due to their inherent capacity to kill pathogens [12]. Recently, phages have achieved a great success in treating patients infected by multidrug resistant bacteria [13]. In agriculture and food industry, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have approved the use of phages for Salmonella control in poultry, and against E. coli in red meat [14]. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and AMR profile of Salmonella in pig slaughterhouses in Hubei Province, China. By using those Salmonella isolates recovered as indicator bacteria, we isolated many lytic Salmonella phages and established a Salmonella phage library. One phage isolate showed a broad-spectrum of killing antibiotic resistant Salmonella strains belonging to different serotypes. This phage also exhibited good effect on control Salmonella infection in mouse models.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates from slaughterhouses in Hubei Province

Between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, we collected a total of 1289 samples including anal swabs of pigs (862/1289), environmental swabs (204/1289), carcass surface swabs (36/1289) and environmental agar plates (187/1289) from eleven slaughterhouses in seven cities in Hubei Province in China and recovered 106 Salmonella isolates from these samples (Fig. 1A). The total isolation rates of Salmonella from different types of samples from the eleven slaughterhouses ranged from 0 (0/36) to 9.74% (84/862) (Fig. 1B). Determination of serovars demonstrated four types of serovars, and 71.70% (76/106) of the isolates belonged to Salmonella Typhimurium (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Isolation and antimicrobial resistant phenotypes of Salmonella from pig slaughter houses in Hubei Province in China. A A column chart showing the distribution of different types of samples collected for Salmonella isolation; B A column chart showing the isolation rates of Salmonella from different types of samples; C A column chart showing the distribution of different Salmonella serovars; D A column chart showing the percent isolates of Salmonella with different phenotypes against different antibiotics; E A column chart showing the numbers of Salmonella isolates with resistant phenotypes to different antimicrobial classes; F A column chart showing the numbers of Salmonella isolates resisting different numbers of antimicrobial classes

Full size image

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) revealed that over 90% of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin (100%, 106/106), spectinomycin (96.23%, 102/106), doxycycline (93.40%, 99/106), tilmicosin (91.51%, 97/106), and tetracycline (90.57%, 96/106) (Fig. 1D). Conversely, less than 15% of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (13.21%, 14/106), ceftiofur (9.43%, 10/106), gentamicin (5.66%, 6/106), imipenem (2.83%, 3/106), enrofloxacin (1.89%, 2/106), cefepime (0.94%, 1/106), and colistin (0.94%, 1/106). Regarding different antimicrobial classes, all Salmonella isolates recovered from pig slaughterhouses were resistant to macrolides (100%; erythromycin & tilmicosin) while a large proportion of the isolates were resistant to tetracyclines (97.17%; tetracycline & tigecycline & doxycycline), aminocyclitols (96.23%; spectinomycin), phenicols (79.25%; florfenicol), penicillins (78.30%; ampicillin & amoxicillin), and folate pathway antagonists (67.92%; sulfisoxazole & sulfamethoxazole) (Fig. 1E). In contrast, a low proportion of the isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones (14.15%; ciprofloxacin & enrofloxacin), cephalosporins (9.43%; ceftiofur & cefepime), aminoglycosides (5.66%; gentamicin), carbapenems (2.83%; imipenem), and polymyxins (0.94%; colistin). Over 99.06% (105/106) of the isolates displayed phenotypes of multidrug resistance (resistant to more than 3 antimicrobial classes) and nearly half of them (42.86%, 42/105) were resistant to six of the eleven antimicrobial classes tested (Fig. 1F). Resistance to “macrolides plus tetracyclines plus aminocyclitols” was the most common multidrug resistant phenotypes, accounting for 94.29% (99/106) of the multidrug resistant isolates.

Isolation and phenotypical characteristics of Salmonella bacteriophages

Using Salmonella isolates from slaughterhouses as indicator bacteria, we isolated 37 phages from pig anal swabs collected from different pig farms and slaughterhouses in Hubei Province. According to the plaque size formed by these phages, we selected one designated ph 2–2, which produced the largest and clearest plaques for further evaluation (Fig. 2A). Phage ph 2–2 was isolated using a Salmonella Paratyphi strain 201,107 as the indicator and a titer of 1.8 × 1010 PFU/ml was produced using the host bacterium. Electron microscopy showed that ph 2–2 had an icosahedrally symmetric head of approximately 70.00 nm in diameter and a long tail of ~ 110.00 nm in length (Fig. 2B). Based on these morphological characteristics and according to the latest International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) classification, ph 2–2 was defined as a member of the Siphoviridae family.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phenotypical characteristics of Salmonella phage ph 2–2. A Plaques of phage ph 2–2 on Salmonella Paratyphi 201,007; B Transmission electron micrograph of phage ph 2–2; C A column chart showing the titers of phage ph 2–2 at different multiplicity of infection (MOI) values; D One-step growth curve of phage ph 2–2; E A line chart showing the effect of phage ph 2–2 killing Salmonella Paratyphi strain 201,107 at different MOI values; F A line chart showing the effect of phage ph 2–2 killing Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 at different MOI values; G A line chart showing the changes of ph 2–2 titers at different temperatures; H A column chart showing the changes of ph 2–2 titers at different pHs; I A column chart showing the changes of ph 2–2 titers exposed to UV for different times; J A column chart showing the changes of ph 2–2 titers exposed to 75% ethanol for different times. Data represents mean ± SD. The significance level was set at P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.001 (**); ns: No significance

Full size image

We next tested different life cycle parameters of ph 2–2. Measurement of optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI) showed that ph 2–2 had the highest titer (3.0 × 1010 PFU/ml) in the host bacterium at MOI =0.1 (Fig. 2C). One-step-curve determination tests demonstrated that the life cycle of ph 2–2 consisted of an approximately 10-min eclipse period and a 90-min infection process; the average burst size was 476 phage particles per infected cell after 100 min at 37 °C (Fig. 2D). Test of bacteriophage lytic curve showed that ph 2–2 displayed good effects to lyse both the host bacterium Salmonella Paratyphi strain 201,107 and a Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 (Fig. 2E and F). Thermolability tests revealed ph 2–2 was stable from 4 ~ 60 °C, but it still exhibited lytic activities at 70 °C for 40 min or 80 °C for 20 min (Fig. 2G). pH sensitivity tests showed that ph 2–2 was stable from pH 5.0 to pH 11.0 (Fig. 2H). UV and ethanol exposure tests demonstrated that ph 2–2 still displayed good antibacterial effects after exposure to UV for 5 min (Fig. 2I), and/or treatment with 75% ethanol for 20 min (Fig. 2J).

Host range tests revealed that the phage was able to kill all the 106 Salmonella isolates from the slaughterhouses (Table 1). However, it displayed no capacity to lyse bacteria belonging to other species, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Streptococcus suis (Table 1).

Table 1 Host range of Salmonella phage ph 2–2
Full size table

Genomic characteristics of a lytic Salmonella bacteriophage

Whole genome sequencing demonstrated that ph 2–2 possessed a double-strand genomic DNA of approximately 85,944 bp in length with a G + C content of 38.81% (Fig. 3A). The genome of ph 2–2 encoded 128 putative proteins involved in phage structure and assembly, DNA replication and regulation modules, lysis function, and/or unknown function (Table S1 in supplementary file). Phylogenetic analysis based on the nucleotide sequences of the large subunit of phage terminase showed that ph 2–2 was a member of the Felixounavirus genus of the Myoviridae family (Fig. 3B). Sequence alignments revealed that the genome sequence of ph 2–2 was highly homologous to those of Salmonella phage SP2 SHa-2019 (GenBank accession number: MW362867) and Salmonella phage SP4 SHa-2019 (GenBank accession number: MW321605) (Fig. 3C). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between the genomes of ph 2–2 and SP2 SHa-2019 was 95.38% (calculated by ANI, http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/), and 95.38% between the genomes of ph 2–2 and SP4 SHa-2019. However, the genome of ph 2–2 encoded two putative lysozymes, while both the genomes of SP2 SHa-2019 and SP4 SHa-2019 encoded one lysozyme (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Genomic characteristics of Salmonella phage ph 2–2. A A circle map showing the complete genome sequence of phage ph 2–2; circles from inside to outside represent the numbers of coding sequences (CDS) and tRNAs (circle 1), depth of illumine sequencing (circle 2), GC skew (circle 3), G + C content (circle 4), and the genome circle (circle 5); B Phylogenetic relationships of bacterial phages belonging to the Myoviridae family; the tree was generated based on the nucleotide sequences of the large subunit of phage terminases; The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site; The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.31527374 is shown; The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches; There were a total of 1605 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X; (C) A co-linearity comparison diagram of the genomic organization at the nucleotide level between Salmonella phages ph 2–2, SP2 SHa-2019 (GenBank accession number: MW362867) and SP4 SHa-2019 (GenBank accession number: MW321605); The figure was generated via Easyfig v.2.0. The color code refers to the BLASTn identity of those regions between genomes. Arrows represent putative CDSs encoded by different genomes

Full size image

Application of a lytic bacteriophage to control Salmonella infections in mouse models

To further investigate the activity of ph 2–2 on the control of Salmonella infection, 4–6-week-old C57BL/6 J mice were challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 through gavage (~ 107 CFU per mouse) and intraperitoneal routine (~ 106 CFU per mouse), and then received a treatment of either ph 2–2 (107 PFU per mouse, MOI = 1) or PBS (Fig. 4A). In parallel, mice were also treated with ph 2–2 or PBS only by gavage or through the intraperitoneal routine. The results revealed a good safety of ph 2–2 to the mice, as the administration of the phage, either by gavage or intraperitoneal routine, did not affect the growth condition and/or lead to the death of the mice (Fig. 4B, C, and D). Moreover, ph 2–2 therapy, either by gavage or through intraperitoneal administration, dramatically lessened body-decrease caused by Salmonella (Fig. 4B), and reduced the mortality by Salmonella (Fig. 4C and D). Treatment of ph 2–2 by gavage saved 75% (3/4) of the mice from Salmonella infection by gavage (Fig. 4C), while intraperitoneal administration of ph 2–2 saved 100% (5/5) of the mice from Salmonella infection by intraperitoneal challenge (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Experimental scheme for the evaluation of ph 2–2 treatment efficacy in mice infected with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344. A Study design of the animal tests; dpc: days post challenge; hpc: hours post challenge; B A line chart showing changes of body weight of mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 by gavage and received a treatment of PBS by gavage (blue line); mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 by gavage and received a treatment of ph 2–2 by gavage (purple line); mice received an administration of PBS (green line) and/or ph 2–2 by gavage (orange line); Data represents mean ± SD. ns: No significance; C Mortality of mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 by gavage and received a treatment of PBS by gavage (blue line); mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 by gavage and received a treatment of ph 2–2 by gavage (purple line); mice received an administration of PBS (green line) and/or ph 2–2 by gavage (orange line); D Mortality of mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 through intraperitoneal injection and received a treatment of PBS through intraperitoneal injection (blue line); mice challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 through intraperitoneal injection and received a treatment of ph 2–2 through intraperitoneal injection (purple line); mice received an administration of PBS (green line) and/or ph 2–2 through intraperitoneal injection (orange line)

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of Salmonella, which is a very important foodborne and zoonotic pathogen, in eleven slaughterhouses in seven cities in Hubei Province. Our results revealed that Salmonella isolates could be recovered from different types of samples collected from these pig slaughterhouses, indicating that contamination of Salmonella represents a problem in the pig slaughtering node of the pork supply chain. Considering pork is the primary meat for most of the people in China [15], the prevalence of Salmonella in pig slaughterhouses should receive more attention, and actions should be taken to decrease the contamination of Salmonella. This is particularly important as Salmonella is responsible for 37.3% of foodborne bacterial diseases in China [16]. Our data of bacterial isolation also revealed that many Salmonella isolates were recovered from the anal swabs of pigs, suggesting that the pig farms might be an important origin for Salmonella contamination in slaughterhouses. In the next step, we intend to investigate the contamination of Salmonella in the upstream pig farms of those Salmonella-recovered pigs. Our determination of serovars showed that most Salmonella isolates recovered from slaughterhouses were Salmonella Typhimurium. These results are in agreement with those from other studies performed in both China and outside China [17,18,19]. It should be noted that Salmonella Typhimurium has been recognized to be responsible for the majority of Salmonella infection cases worldwide [5]. Therefore, the contamination of this serovar poses a big threat to public health. This study also recovered nine Salmonella Paratyphi isolates from both pig anal swabs (n = 6) and environmental samples (n = 3) from slaughterhouses (Fig. 1C). Among different Salmonella Paratyphi members, Salmonella Paratyphi A strains are host-restricted pathogens whose reservoir is humans [20]; while other Salmonella Paratyphi sub-serovars such as B or C strains have been widely recovered from non-human hosts [21, 22]. In the next step, we intend to study the sub-serovars, virulence and genomics of these nine Salmonella Paratyphi isolates.

Administration of antibiotics is still an effective option for the treatment of bacterial infections in both human and veterinary medicine [23]. However, the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria may lead to antibiotic-based therapy failure in clinical activity and therefore have raised a global public health concern in recently years [7]. Since food animals are considered as key reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [24], we determined the AMR phenotypes of Salmonella isolates recovered in this study, and our AST results indicated a high rate of antimicrobial resistance of these isolates. Many isolates displayed resistance phenotypes to macrolides, tetracyclines, aminocyclitols, phenicol, penicillin, and folate pathway antagonists. While most of these antibiotics are not used in slaughterhouses, they are frequently used in pig farms in China [25,26,27]. The extensive use of these antibiotics in farms may induce the resistance phenotypes in Salmonella, and these drug-resistant Salmonella are finally recovered from the swabs of pigs shipped to the slaughter houses. It should be noted that a large proportion of isolates (80.19%, 85/106) were found to be tigecycline-resistant. This might be because currently only a EUCAST breakpoint for tigecycline is available, and this value is very low (Resistant enterobacteria are interpreted as those with a MIC value over 0.5 μg/ml) [28]. Most of the tigecycline-resistant Salmonella recovered in this study possessed MIC values of 1 μg/ml (39 isolates) or 2 μg/ml (31 isolates). While as a last-resort antibiotic for treating infections caused by gram-negative bacteria, tigecycline has never been approved to be used in agriculture in China, but tetracycline-resistant bacteria displaying tigecycline-resistance at low level have been documented [29,30,31]. Therefore, the phenotypes of tigecycline-resistance determined in these isolates might be associated with their tetracycline-resistance. As another kind of last-resort antibiotic, imipenem has also never been approved to be used in livestock in China, several imipenem-resistant isolates were still recovered. The recovery of these isolates might due to contaminated in-house environment, as a recent study have found a high detection rate (26.8–31.4%) of blaNDM (which confers resistance to carbapenems) in environmental samples except air after standard cleaning and disinfection during the vacancy period in a Chinese poultry farm [32]. While it still lacks of direct evidence, similar conditions might also occur in pig farms. In addition, we also recovered several colistin-resistant Salmonella isolates. Although colistin has been banned for use in agriculture in China in 2017 [33], colistin-resistant bacteria or genes (e.g., the mcr family) may persist in livestock in China [34,35,36]. In the next step, we intend to analyze the molecular mechanisms of resistance to these last-resort antibiotics in the Salmonella isolates recovered in this study.

As the natural predators of bacteria, phages are recognized as promising therapeutics for bacterial infections since their discovery [12], and they indeed have achieved a great success in saving lives from infections caused by MDR-pathogens [13]. While there is still a long way to go, many laboratory studies have tested the potential use of phages or their related products in fighting against bacteria, and those studies have also demonstrated good results [37,38,39]. Therefore, we also isolated and screened lytic phages using the Salmonella isolates as indictor bacteria and evaluated their use in combating the drug resistant Salmonella recovered in this study. According to the results of a series of laboratory tests, a lytic phage ph 2–2 demonstrated a good potential. This phage was stable and displayed good capacity of killing drug resistant Salmonella in different adverse conditions (high or low temperatures, high or low pHs, UV exposure, 75% Ethanol exposure). In particular, the burst size, thermolability, and pH stability of ph 2–2 are better than those of the three Salmonella phages we tested previously [40]. A good stability of a phage in different adverse conditions increases its potential use in fighting against pathogenic bacteria [37, 38, 40, 41]. In addition to good stability, a potential phage candidate should also have a wide host range [37, 38, 40]. Our test revealed that although ph 2–2 was isolated using a Salmonella Paratyphi strain, it displayed good capacity to kill Salmonella isolates belonging to other serovars, including Salmonella Typhimurium. Considering Salmonella Typhimurium is the causative agent of the majority of Salmonella infection cases worldwide [5], we therefore investigated the effect of ph 2–2 on treating S. typhimurium infections in mouse models in different administration routines. Our results showed that ph 2–2 was safe to mice and could save experimental mice from lethal infections caused by Salmonella Typhimurium. These findings indicate that ph 2–2 might be a good candidate to combat drug-resistant Salmonella in vivo and in vitro.

Conclusions

The data presented herein demonstrated that Salmonella contamination remains a problem in some pig slaughter houses in China and Salmonella isolates recovered from pigs or environmental samples of slaughter houses displayed a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, we also showed a broad-spectrum lytic Myoviridae phage ph 2–2 displayed good capacity to kill drug resistant Salmonella in vivo and in vitro. It might represent a good candidate for the development of anti-Salmonella agents.

Methods

Sample collection, bacterial isolation, purification, and serotyping

Between July 2020 and July 2021, a total of 1289 samples including anal swabs of pigs (862/1289), environmental swabs (204/1289), carcass surface swabs (36/1289) and environmental agar plates (187/1289; Salmonella Shigella [SS] Agar plates were left in the open for at least 3 hours in different spaces along the pig treatment direction in the slaughterhouses) were collected from eleven slaughterhouses in seven cities in Hubei Province in China (Fig. 1A). Swabs were stored in Buffered Peptone Water (BPW). All samples were shipped to laboratory on ice and were treated immediately after collection. Salmonella was isolated as described previously [42]. Briefly, swabs were streaked on SS agars and were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Environmental agar plates were put into a 37 °C chamber directly. Presumptive colonies were selected and Salmonella was confirmed by gram-staining, biochemical tests, 16S rRNA sequencing, as well as PCR detection of the invA gene as described previously [43]. A previously reported multiplex PCR serotyping method was applied to determine the serovars of Salmonella isolates recovered in this study [44]. The determined serovars were finally confirmed through the Kauffmann–White classification method [45]. Salmonella antisera were purchased from Ningbo Tianrun Bio-pharmaceutical Co., LTD (Ningbo, China).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution method following the protocol published by Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [46]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 18 types of antibiotics belonging to aminocyclitols (spectinomycin; MedChemExpress [MCE], Monmouth Junction, US), aminoglycosides (gentamicin; MCE), carbapenems (imipenem; MCE), cephalosporins (ceftiofur, cefepime; MCE), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin; MCE), folate pathway antagonists (sulfisoxazole, sulfamethoxazole; MCE), macrolides (erythromycin, tilmicosin; MCE), penicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin; MCE), phenicols (florfenicol; MCE), polymyxins (colistin; MCE), and tetracyclines (tetracycline, tigecycline, doxycycline; MCE). Results were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (CLSI M100: amoxicillin [Resistant (R): ≥ 32 μg/ml, Intermediate (I): 16 μg/ml, Susceptible (S): ≤ 8 μg/ml]; ampicillin [R: ≥ 32 μg/ml, I: 16 μg/ml, S: ≤ 8 μg/ml]; cefepime [R: ≥ 16 μg/ml, S: ≤ 2 μg/ml]; ciprofloxacin [R: ≥ 1 μg/ml, I: 0.12–0.5 μg/ml, S: ≤ 0.06 μg/ml]; colistin [R: ≥ 4 μg/ml, I: 2 μg/ml]; doxycycline [R: ≥ 16 μg/ml, I: 8 μg/ml, S: ≤ 4 μg/ml]; gentamicin [R: ≥ 16 μg/ml, I: 8 μg/ml, S: ≤ 4 μg/ml]; sulfamethoxazole [R: ≥ 76 μg/ml, S: ≤ 8 μg/ml]; sulfisoxazole [R: ≥ 512 μg/ml, S: ≤ 256 μg/ml]; imipenem [R: ≥ 4 μg/ml, I: 2 μg/ml, S: ≤ 1 μg/ml]; tetracycline [R: ≥ 16 μg/ml, I: 8 μg/ml, S: ≤ 4 μg/ml]; CLSI M31-A3: ceftiofur [R: ≥ 8 μg/ml, I: 4 μg/ml, S: ≤ 2 μg/ml]; enrofloxacin [R: ≥ 4 μg/ml, I: 1–2 μg/ml, S: ≤ 0.5 μg/ml]; florfenicol [R: ≥ 16 μg/ml, I: 8 μg/ml, S: ≤ 4 μg/ml]) [46, 47], or EUCAST breakpoints (tigecycline [R: > 0.5 μg/ml, S: ≤ 0.5 μg/ml]) [28], or by reference published articles (erythromycin [R: ≥ 8 μg/ml]; spectinomycin [R: ≥ 32 μg/ml]; tilmicosin [R: ≥ 32 μg/ml]) [48]. For each type of the antibiotics, the MIC value was tested three times separately. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control.

Bacteriophage isolation and purification

Bacteriophages were isolated from 83 anal swabs of pigs collected from slaughterhouses and farms in Hubei Province through a previously described double-layer agar method [37, 38], with several minor modifications. Salmonella isolates recovered in this study were used as indicator bacteria. Briefly, anal swabs were washed thoroughly using PBS. The mixtures were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min, followed by a filtration through a 0.22-μm pore size membrane. After that, the filtrates, the bacterial culture of Salmonella at mid-log phase, and fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were mixed at a volume ratio of 1: 1: 2. The mixture was shaken at 220 rpm, 37 °C for 2.5–3.5 h. The above-cocultures were rested at 4 °C for 2 h, followed by another centrifugation at 4 °C, 7000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were filtered again through a 0.22-μm pore size membrane. Thereafter, the filtrate was mixed with the indicator bacterium at a volume ratio of 1: 3, and was poured into 8 ml of molten soft LB agar (LB broth + 1.5% w/v agar [final concentration]). Finally, the mixture was poured onto a prepared Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, US) and incubated overnight at 37 °C to numerate the plaques.

After the plaques were numerated, a single plaque was picked and resuspended using a SM buffer [5.8 g of NaCl, 2.0 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 50 mL of Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5.0 mL of 2% gelatin] [49]. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 30 s, the supernatant of the phage-containing SM buffer was filtered through a 0.22-μm pore size membrane. Next, the phage preparations were given serial 10-fold dilutions with sterile SM buffer. Phage isolation by above-mentioned double-layer agar method was repeated four more times, and the phage suspensions were stored at 4 °C. Finally, the phages were purified by CsCl gradient ultra-centrifugation, as described previously [41].

Phenotypical characterization

To determine the morphology of ph 2–2, samples were prepared according to the protocol described previously [41], and were observed under a 100-kV transmission electron microscope (HITACHI H-7650, Tokyo, Japan). To measure the optimal MOI value, ph 2–2 at different MOI values (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0) were incubated with the indicator bacterium Salmonella Paratyphi strain 201,107 at mid-log phase (2.94 × 107 CFU) in LB broth at 37 °C, 180 rpm for 3 h, and the optimal MOI value was determined through the above-mentioned double-layer agar method. For the measurement of the one-step growth curve, ph 2–2 at optimal MOI value was co-cultured with Salmonella Paratyphi 201,107 at mid-log phase. After that, phage titers were measured once every 10 min for 150 min. The experiment was repeated three times, and the burst size was calculated as the ratio between the number of phages before and after the burst [37, 38]. The thermolability of ph 2–2 was tested by measuring the titers of the phage following treatments of the phage particles (in SM buffer) at different temperatures (4 °C, 20 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and/or 80 °C) from different times (20 min, 40 min, and 60 min); while the pH sensitivity was tested by measuring the titers of the phage following incubations of the phage particles (in SM buffer) at 37 °C for 1 h under different pH levels (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). To test the UV sensitivity, phage particles were treated under UV (20 W) for different times (0, 5, 15, 30 min), and were then treated at dark atmosphere for another 30 min before measuring the titers. For the determination of ethanol sensitivity, phage particles were treated using 75% ethanol and the titers were measured every 10 min post the treatment. In the above tests of thermolability, pH sensitivity, UV sensitivity, and ethanol sensitivity, samples were titered by the double-layer agar plate method [37], and each assay was performed in triplicate.

The host range of ph 2–2 was determined by spot tests, as described previously [50]. All 106 Salmonella isolates recovered in this study as well as our laboratory stored eight strains belonging to the other bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Streptococcus suis) were used (Table 1). Each of the bacterial strains at mid-log phase were mixed with the above-mentioned molten soft LB agar at a volume ratio of 1:3, which was then poured onto a prepared Tryptic Soy Agar. After each overlay solidified, 4 μL of the phage lysate (1 × 1010 PFU/mL) was spotted onto the bacterial overlays, dried, and then incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. The same volume of sterile phage buffer was also spotted onto the bacterial overlays and incubated under the same conditions as the controls. Lytic specificity was defined based on the formation of bacteriophage plaques. The spot tests were repeated three times to confirm the results. The efficiency of plating (EOP) value was calculated as previously described [37], which was determined by calculating the ratio of plaque-forming units (PFUs) of each phage-susceptible strain to the PFUs of indicator strain (Salmonella Paratyphi 210,007). This experiment was also repeated three times.

Whole genome sequencing, data availability, and bioinformatic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform method, as described previously [37]. DNA quality and quantity was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel as well as using a Qubit 2.0 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA). Afterwards, 300–400 bp sequencing libraries were prepared using a commercial Agencourt AMPure XP medium kit, and were sequenced on a BGI MGISEQ-2000 platform (BGI, Shenzhen, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 643,053,476 bp raw reads (sequence coverage: 7482 ×) were yielded. Thereafter, raw reads with low quality were filtered and eliminated by SOAPnuke (version 1.5.0) software [51] according to the following criteria: reads with a certain proportion of low-quality bases (40% as the default, parameter setting at 20 bp), and/or with a certain proportion of Ns (10% as the default, parameter setting at 1 bp) were removed. Adapter contamination (15 bp overlap between the adapter and reads as the default, parameter setting at 15 bp) and duplication contamination were also removed. Through this step, approximately 643,053,476 bp clean reads (Q20% = 100%) were produced. These high-quality reads were de novo assembled using Unicycler package (version 0.4.8) [52]. Finally, an 85,944 bp (N50: 85,944 bp) genome sequence was obtained. Genome annotation was performed using RAST sever [53]. The complete genome sequence of ph 2–2 and its annotations have been deposited into GenBank, the accession number is OL474141. To clarify the taxonomical characteristics of ph 2–2, the nucleotide sequences of the large subunit of terminase were extracted from the whole genome sequences of different phages downloaded from NCBI (accession numbers are given in Fig. 3B). A phylogenetic tree generated based on the sequences of the large subunit of phage terminase was conducted in MEGA X [54] with a bootstrap value of 1000. Sequence alignment was performed and visualized using EasyFig v. 2.2.2 [55]. Average nucleotide identities between two genome sequences were calculated using an ANI calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/).

Animal tests and ethic statement

All experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and the study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Mouse experiments were performed at the Laboratory Animal Center of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China) with the approval from the Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs) of the University (approval number: HZAUMO-2021-0143). Laboratory animals were treated following the Regulations on the Administration of Laboratory Animals in Hubei Province [2005]. Study design is shown in Fig. 4A. Briefly, forty 4–6-week-old C57BL/6 J mice were divided into eight groups (A1 ~ A4; B1 ~ B4) and each group contained 5 mice. Mice in groups A2 and A3 were challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 (107 CFU per mouse) by gavage while those in groups B2 and B3 were challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium 1344 (106 CFU per mouse) through intraperitoneal routine. At 6-, 18-, 30-, 42-, and 54-hours post challenge (hpc), bacterial-infected mice in groups A2, A3, B2, and B3 received a treatment of phage ph 2–2 (107 PFU per mouse by gavage), PBS (0.1 ml per mouse by gavage), phage ph 2–2 (107 PFU per mouse through intraperitoneal injection), and PBS (0.1 ml per mouse through intraperitoneal injection), respectively. At the same time points, mice in groups A1, B1, A4, and B4 were administrated with PBS (0.1 ml per mouse) by gavage, ph 2–2 (107 PFU per mouse) by gavage, PBS (0.1 ml per mouse) through intraperitoneal injection, phage ph 2–2 (107 PFU per mouse) through intraperitoneal injection, respectively. Body weights and mortality of the experimental mice in each group were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed through the “Two-way ANOVA” strategy in GraphPad Prism8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data represents mean ± SD. The significance level was set at P < 0.05 (*).

Availability of data and materials

The complete genome sequence of ph 2–2 and its annotations have been deposited into GenBank, the accession number is OL474141.

Abbreviations

AMR:

Antimicrobial resistance

AST:

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

CFU:

Colony-forming unit

LB:

Luria-Bertani

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

PFU:

Plaque-forming unit

References

  1. CDC: Salmonella. https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/. Accessed 13 Feb 2022.

  2. Ran L, Wu S, Gao Y, Zhang X, Feng Z, Wang Z, et al. Laboratory-based surveillance of nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in China. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8:921–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qi XL, Wang HX, Bu SR, Xu XG, Wu XY, Lin DF. Incidence rates and clinical symptoms of Salmonella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Shigella infections in China, 1998-2013. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grimont PA, Weill F-X. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. WHO Collaborating Centre Ref Res Salmonella. 2007;9:1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hernandez SM, Keel K, Sanchez S, Trees E, Gerner-Smidt P, Adams JK, et al. Epidemiology of a Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Typhimurium strain associated with a songbird outbreak. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7290–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chlebicz A, Śliżewska K. Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, yersiniosis, and listeriosis as zoonotic foodborne diseases: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:863.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. WHO. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frost I, Van Boeckel TP, Pires J, Craig J, Laxminarayan R. Global geographic trends in antimicrobial resistance: the role of international travel. J Travel Med. 2019;26:taz036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osei Sekyere J. Current state of resistance to antibiotics of last-resort in South Africa: a review from a public health perspective. Front Public Health. 2016;4:209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin S, Qi H, Zhang Q, Zhao D, Liu Z-Z, Tian H, et al. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant Proteus mirabilis harboring a conjugative NDM-1 plasmid and a novel Salmonella genomic island 1 variant, SGI1-Z. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6601–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer J, Rodríguez I, Schmoger S, Friese A, Roesler U, Helmuth R, et al. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica producing VIM-1 carbapenemase isolated from livestock farms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:478–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salmond GP, Fineran PC. A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:777–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. UCSD: Novel phage therapy saves patient with multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-04-phage-therapy-patient-multidrug-resistant-bacterial.html. Accessed 13 Feb 2022.

  14. Sillankorva SM, Oliveira H, Azeredo J. Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:863945.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan C, Kinsey JD. The supply chain of pork: US and China; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Li W, Dai Y, Jiang Y, Liang J, Wang S, et al. Characteristics of settings and etiologic agents of foodborne disease outbreaks—China, 2020. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3:889.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu B, Ed-Dra A, Pan H, Dong C, Jia C, Yue M. Genomic investigation of Salmonella isolates recovered from a pig slaughtering process in Hangzhou, China. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:704636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanenburg M, Urlings HA, Snijders JM, Keuzenkamp DA, van Knapen F. Salmonella in slaughter pigs: prevalence, serotypes and critical control points during slaughter in two slaughterhouses. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;70:243–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Botteldoorn N, Heyndrickx M, Rijpens N, Grijspeerdt K, Herman L. Salmonella on pig carcasses: positive pigs and cross contamination in the slaughterhouse. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95:891–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanderson KE, Liu SL, L. T, R.N. J. Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A. Mol Med Microbiol (Second Edition). 2015;2:1275–306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Hernández R, Bernal JF, Cifuentes JF, Fandiño LC, Herrera-Sánchez MP, Rondón-Barragán I, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Salmonella isolated from broiler farms at the Tolima region-Colombia. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(4):970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fadlalla IM, Hamid ME, Rahim AGA, Ibrahim MT. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella serotypes isolated from human and animals in Sudan. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2012;4:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma C, Rokana N, Chandra M, Singh BP, Gulhane RD, Gill JPS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: its surveillance, impact, and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Founou LL, Founou RC, Essack SY. Antibiotic resistance in the food chain: a developing country-perspective. Front Microbiol. 1881;2016:7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang H, Paruch L, Chen X, van Eerde A, Skomedal H, Wang Y, et al. Antibiotic application and resistance in swine production in China: current situation and future perspectives. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnasamy V, Otte J, Silbergeld E. Antimicrobial use in Chinese swine and broiler poultry production. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015;4:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang QQ, Ying GG, Pan CG, Liu YS, Zhao JL. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:6772–82.

  28. EUCAST: Clinical breakpoints - bacteria (v 11.0). 2021. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_11.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2022.

  29. Grossman TH. Tetracycline antibiotics and resistance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6:a025387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Linkevicius M, Sandegren L, Andersson DI. Potential of tetracycline resistance proteins to evolve Tigecycline resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:789–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Akiyama T, Presedo J, Khan AA. The tetA gene decreases tigecycline sensitivity of Salmonella enterica isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;42:133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhai R, Fu B, Shi X, Sun C, Liu Z, Wang S, et al. Contaminated in-house environment contributes to the persistence and transmission of NDM-producing bacteria in a Chinese poultry farm. Environ Int. 2020;139:105715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Xu C, Zhang R, Chen Y, Shen Y, Hu F, et al. Changes in colistin resistance and mcr-1 abundance in Escherichia coli of animal and human origins following the ban of colistin-positive additives in China: an epidemiological comparative study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:1161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Q, Chen W, Elbediwi M, Pan H, Wang L, Zhou C, et al. Characterization of Salmonella Resistome and Plasmidome in pork production system in Jiangsu, China. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Elbediwi M, Beibei W, Pan H, Jiang Z, Biswas S, Li Y, et al. Genomic characterization of mcr-1-carrying Salmonella enterica Serovar 4,[5],12:i:- ST 34 clone isolated from pigs in China. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Elbediwi M, Pan H, Biswas S, Li Y, Yue M. Emerging colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Newport isolates from human infections. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:535–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Y, Guo G, Sun E, Song J, Yang L, Zhu L, et al. Isolation of a T7-like lytic Pasteurella bacteriophage vB_PmuP_PHB01 and its potential use in therapy against Pasteurella multocida infections. Viruses. 2019;11(1):86.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang D, Chen Y, Sun E, Hua L, Peng Z, Wu B. Characterization of a lytic bacteriophage vB_EfaS_PHB08 harboring Endolysin Lys08 against enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Microorganisms. 2020;8(9):1332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Peng Z, Wang S, Gide M, Zhu D, Lamabadu Warnakulasuriya Patabendige HM, Li C, et al. A novel bacteriophage Lysin-human Defensin fusion protein is effective in treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in mice. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Y, Sun E, Song J, Tong Y, Wu B. Three Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis bacteriophages from the Siphoviridae family are promising candidates for phage therapy. Can J Microbiol. 2018;64:865–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y, Sun E, Song J, Yang L, Wu B. Complete genome sequence of a novel T7-like bacteriophage from a Pasteurella multocida capsular type a isolate. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75:574–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang X, Kuang D, Meng J, Pan H, Shen J, Zhang J, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular typing of Salmonella Stanley isolated from humans, foods, and environment. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12:945–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chiu CH, Ou JT. Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in feces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and spvC, by an enrichment broth culture-multiplex PCR combination assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2619–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jean-Gilles Beaubrun J, Ewing L, Jarvis K, Dudley K, Grim C, Gopinath G, et al. Comparison of a PCR serotyping assay, check&trace assay for Salmonella, and Luminex Salmonella serotyping assay for the characterization of Salmonella enterica identified from fresh and naturally contaminated cilantro. Food Microbiol. 2014;42:181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  46. CLSI. M100: performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 30th ed; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  47. CLSI. M31-A3: performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for Bacteria isolated from animals; Approved Standard-Third Edition. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Khaitsa ML, Kegode RB, Bauer ML, Gibbs PS, Lardy GP, Doetkott DK. A longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance patterns in North Dakota feedlot cattle. J Food Prot. 2007;70:476–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chibani-Chennoufi S, Sidoti J, Bruttin A, Kutter E, Sarker S, Brüssow H. In vitro and in vivo bacteriolytic activities of Escherichia coli phages: implications for phage therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2558–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Jensen KC, Hair BB, Wienclaw TM, Murdock MH, Hatch JB, Trent AT, et al. Isolation and host range of bacteriophage with lytic activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and potential use as a fomite decontaminant. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen Y, Chen Y, Shi C, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Li S, et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience. 2018;7:1–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1009–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members at Wu Lab for sample collection and treatment.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Hubei Provincial Research and Development Program of China (grant number: 2021BBA085), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Number 31902241), and Walmart Foundation (Project # 61626817) and supported by Walmart Food Safety Collaboration Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Mengfei Zhao, Rui Xie, Shuang Wang, Xi Huang, Hao Yang, Wenqing Wu, Lin Lin, Hongjian Chen, Jie Fan, Lin Hua, Wan Liang, Xiangru Wang, Huanchun Chen, Zhong Peng & Bin Wu

  2. Key Laboratory of Preventive Veterinary Medicine in Hubei Province, The Cooperative Innovation Centre for Sustainable Pig Production, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Mengfei Zhao, Rui Xie, Shuang Wang, Xi Huang, Hao Yang, Wenqing Wu, Lin Lin, Hongjian Chen, Jie Fan, Lin Hua, Wan Liang, Xiangru Wang, Huanchun Chen, Zhong Peng & Bin Wu

  3. Present address: Hubei Jin Xu Agricultural Development Limited by Share Ltd., Wuhan, China

    Wan Liang

  4. National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Jianmin Zhang

  5. Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China

    Zhong Peng

Authors
  1. Mengfei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenqing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hongjian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jie Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lin Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wan Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jianmin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiangru Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Huanchun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Zhong Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Bin Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZP and BW: designed the study and wrote the manuscript; MZ, RX, SW, XH, HY, WW, LL, HC (Hongjian Chen), JF, LH, WL: conducted the experiment and analyzed the data; ZP, HC (Huanchun Chen) and BW: supervised the project and revised the manuscript; JZ and XW: participated in project implementation and contributed with data analysis. All authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhong Peng or Bin Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Mouse experiments were performed at the Laboratory Animal Center of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China) with the approval from the Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs) of the University (approval number: HZAUMO-2021-0143).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Wan Liang is currently an employee of Hubei Jin Xu Agricultural Development Limited by Share Ltd., Wuhan, China. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Putative proteins encoded by the genome sequence of Salmonella phage ph 2–2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Xie, R., Wang, S. et al. Identification of a broad-spectrum lytic Myoviridae bacteriophage using multidrug resistant Salmonella isolates from pig slaughterhouses as the indicator and its application in combating Salmonella infections. BMC Vet Res 18, 270 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03372-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03372-8

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us