Skip to main content

Larva migrans in BALB/c mice experimentally infected with Toxocara cati ensured by PCR assay



Toxocara cati, the cat roundworm, is a parasitic nematode that known to cause toxocariasis in intermediate hosts and humans. In this study, we characterized the dynamics of T. cati larvae migration in BALB/c mice after inoculation with eggs and ensured the migration detecting the larval DNA by a PCR. To evaluate the dynamics of larval migration and distribution, twenty-four BALB/c mice were orally inoculated with 2500 T. cati infective eggs and the visceral organs of the infected animals were examined by pepsin digestion and microscopic parasite counts, followed by PCR at day 1 to 28 post-inoculation.


The PCR assays were successfully used for detection of T. cati larvae in tissue samples and T. cati larvae and the DNAs were found in the liver, lungs, heart, kidneys and the brain. We detected T. cati in 92.2% of tissue samples by PCR, 30% higher than the conventional pepsin digestion technique.


Our findings demonstrated that the PCR assay is a sensitive and specific for the detection of T. cati larvae. Therefore, it could become a useful tool for the investigation of the dynamics of larval migration and Toxocara infection in murine model.

Peer Review reports


Toxocara cati, a global cosmopolitan and typically neglected parasitic zoonosis, is an ascarid nematode in the family Toxocaridae [1, 2]. Felids are the most common definitive hosts of T. cati, while humans as one of the many mammalian and many animals such as rodents and birds can serve as paratenic hosts [3]. Small mammals such as mice accidentally acquire the infection when they ingest infective Toxocara species eggs and are considered as a natural source of infection in the environment for predators [4, 5]. On the other hand, humans become infected by ingestion of infective eggs from various environmental sources contaminated with definitive hosts feces. Toxocariasis encompasses four clinical syndromes: visceral larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, neurotoxocariasis, and hidden or covert toxocariasis. Presentation and outcome of infection are determined by interaction between the host and the parasite [6].

Experimentally, some animals were infected with helminthic parasites and encapsulated larvae were found in the tissues of internal organs of these animals. BALB/c mice has been used as a model to study the host-parasite relationship in human and/or animal toxocariasis [7,8,9]. The larvae hatch and migrate out of the intestine to become lodged in organs and tissue [8]. Infection of rodents with T. cati has been carried out in different strains of rats and mice [5, 10]. However, the kinetic time-lines and migratory route have not been established in the BALB/c strain. The gold standard for the diagnosis of the majority of helminthic infections is conventional microscopy and shown it is one of the most important diagnostic method to determine parasite migration routes and lesions caused by Toxocara species in paratenic hosts [5, 8, 11,12,13,14,15].

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques have revolutionized many areas of study including parasitic infection diagnosis. PCR is widely used mainly because its sensitivity allows the amplification of gDNA fragments from minute amounts of parasite material [16]. Performing a PCR assay does not require any parasitological proficiency and can be easily adapted by diagnostic laboratories that routinely use molecular assays to detect other pathogens. Several reports have shown a high PCR sensitivity for detection of Toxocara DNA in various biological samples from different hosts [17,18,19].

In the current study, the sensitivity between conventional methodology and PCR was compared to characterize T. cati infection in BALB/c mice. This comparison was carried out in two steps. First stage, initially was established the dynamics of infection by digestion method and microscopic observation, and PCR analysis of tissue samples. Then, the larvae migration route by PCR and parasitological examination was evaluated.


Ethical consideration

The study design, including its ethical aspects, was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR.ZUMS.REC.1400.133).


Worm samples were taken from cats with Toxocara referred to Karaj veterinary clinics by taking anti-helminthic drugs (with the consent of animal owners). Unembryonated T. cati eggs were collected from the faeces of naturally infected cats and harvested from adult female worms, incubated for three weeks at 25 °C for embryonation, following the technique described by Zibaei and Uga, [20]. Before inoculation, the eggs were washed three times with distilled water to remove formalin.


Specific pathogen-free male BALB/c mice aged 6–8 weeks, weighing 18–22 g, were used in the study. Animals were purchased from a commercial experimental animals company (Royan Animal Breeding Center, Karaj, Iran). Similar to earlier research, mice were individually housed in plastic cages in an animal maintenance room for the duration of the experiments [5, 12]. The room was maintained at approximately 20–24 °C and 50 ± 5% relative humidity, and operated on a 12 h light/dark photoperiod. Water and pelleted commercial food were supplied ad libitum, and cages were cleaned on a regular basis. The animal care and experimentation were performed according to the national guidelines and protocols approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Alborz University of Medical Sciences in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No.85–23, revised 1996).

Experimental design and protocol

Twenty-four animals were divided into 7 groups: control group (n = 6, with distilled water), six infected groups (n = 3/group). Mice were allowed to acclimatize for 1 week prior to commencing experiments. Total, 18 mice of infected groups were each orally inoculated with 2500 T. cati embryonated eggs suspended in 0.5 mL of saline solution, by stomach tube. The animals were monitored daily for clinical signs during routine animal care.

Recovery of larvae

The infected animals were euthanized using Ketamine-Xylazine (60 mg/kg ketamine with 8 mg/kg xylazine) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 post-inoculation. Larvae were recovered and counted from the liver, lungs, heart, and kidneys using a pepsin digestion method and the modified Baermann technique (Fig. 1) [5]. The brain were removed individually and pressed between two slide-glasses to count the larvae under a light microscope. The controls were euthanized at the end of the study days.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pepsin digestion method. A Anesthesia and euthanization of BALB/c mice using the standard laboratory methods, (B) Tissue digestion by digestive solution (pepsin, HCl, and water), (C) Complete digestion by magnetic stirrer, and (D) The modified Baermann technique for the recovery and counting of larvae

Larval DNA

After necropsy, target organs including the liver, lungs, heart, kidneys and brain were removed in infected and control groups of the studied animals, as previously described [19]. For subsequent extraction of genomic DNA, these tissue samples were fragmented with a scissors and pointed forceps in 5 fractions of 10 mg to 20 mg. Tissue samples were frozen and stored at -80 ºC. After at least 24 h, total DNA was isolated from the stored samples using a commercially available kit.

DNA isolation

Purify gDNA was isolated from samples using Favorprep™ Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech, Ping-Tung, Taiwan, and China) regarding the manufacturer’s instruction. The isolated DNA was eluted in 10 mM Tris–HCl and stored at -20 °C until further use.

PCR primers

A primer pair JW4 and NC2 (Forward primer 5′-ACTGTCGAGGATGAGCGTGA-3′ and Reverse primer 5′-TTAGTTTCTTTTCCTCCGCT-3′, respectively) was used to target a 600-bp fragment of the ribosomal ITS1 and ITS2 regions of T. cati [21].

PCR conditions

All PCR reactions were carried out in 25 μL final volume containing 12.5 μL of Super master mix 2X (Favorgen Biotech, Ping-Tung, Taiwan, China), 1.5 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 pmol/μL), 3 μL of DNA template. The final reaction volume was adjusted to 25 μL with sterile demineralised water. The detailed PCR temperature cycling conditions as described previously [21] as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min. The final cycle was followed by extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and visualized with a UV transilluminator (UV Transilluminator, QUANTUM SD4-1000, VILBER, France) after staining with 3 μg/mL GelRed.


Comparison of sensitivity between conventional and PCR techniques to detect larval infection was evaluated by the Chi-square test and the agreement between techniques, by the McNemar Test. The level of significance was set at 5% (P-values < 0.05). All data analyses were with SPSS 21.0 statistical software.


Animals and dynamics of infection

The outcome of the infection was initially determined by counting the number of larvae that migrated to the tissue in the days after inoculation. The maximum number of tissues larvae was 40 (± 11.34) larvae observed on day 3 post-inoculation. From the 7th day onwards, the amount of recovered larvae steadily decreased until day 28.

Performing the PCR using the genus primer detected the T. cati DNA in samples from days 1 to 28, the last day of evaluation. Interestingly, the more intense parasite DNA amplification bands coincided with the highest amount of parasite larvae recovered with the digestion method.

Migration route characterization by digested tissues analysis

This analysis was initiated on day 1 post-inoculation and at this time parasites were located in the liver tissues in 3 BALB/c, and at the heart in one BALB/c in the six groups each containing 3 animals. Larvae were not found in the kidneys and brain tissues 24 h after infection. However, appearance of larvae in the lungs was clear at 24 h. At this time, two of three animals already showed larvae located inside the tissue. The analysis at days 3 and 7 post-inoculation revealed that all animals had larvae in the liver, lungs, heart and kidneys samples. At this time, no larvae were found in any other tissues that were examined. At days 14, 21 and 28 post-inoculation, the larvae disappeared from the liver samples examined. It is interesting, at these times, some samples from the nine infected-animals had larvae inserted in the lungs, heart, and kidneys. On the other hand, no larvae were observed in the examined brain tissues on the mentioned days. The number of recovered larvae is documented in Table 1. There was no significant difference between larval recovery in the tissues and days post-inoculation (P > 0.05).

Table 1 Number of larvae and detection of DNA of Toxocara cati from BALB/c mice (n = 3) inoculated with 2500 eggs and necropsied at different days post-inoculation

Tissue parasite detection by PCR

The size of PCR product amplified from DNA samples from tissue specimens using the primers JW4 and NC2 were in size 600. This band was detected in DNA samples obtained from the different tissues of sixteen mice in groups of three animals that were euthanized 1 day after infection. This specific band was also amplified in DNA samples from the liver (seven animals), lungs (sixteen animals), heart (five animals), kidneys (four animals), and from the brain (two animals) at days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 72 post-inoculation, respectively. This 600-bp specific amplification band was also present in brain DNA samples obtained from one animal at day 21 and from another BALB/c at the 28 day-period evaluation (Fig. 2A). As expected, this specific band was not detected in any of the samples obtained from the control experimental group (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

DNA amplification of Toxocara cati recovered from BALB/c mice by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels in the analysis of PCR products. A Infected groups, lane M: 100 bp DNA size marker; lanes 1–5: 600 bp DNA from the liver, lungs, heart, kidneys, and brain respectively. Full-length gel image is provided in Supplementary Fig. 2A. B: Control group, lane M: 100 bp ladder; lanes 1–5: the tissue samples without DNA; lane 6: the negative control; and lane 7: DNA standard. Full-length gel image is presented in Supplementary Fig. 2B

The parasite was found by PCR analysis in 83 tissue samples of 90 samples and using digestion analysis in 55 tissue samples of the 90 samples taken from the infected animals in different periods after post-inoculation. The statistical comparison of the two approaches shows that 62.2% were positive by microscopic observation and 92.2% were positive by PCR, and were statistically similar (P > 0.05).

In this study, the agreement on the qualitative assessment was fair for digestion method (n = 6) and PCR assay (n = 55) (Table 2). Divergent results between techniques were observed in 29 samples: 28 were positive by PCR and negative by the microscopic observation analysis, while only 1 was positive by the microscopic analysis and negative by PCR. These divergent results were not statistically significant regarding to McNemar Chi-square test (P ˃ 0.05).

Table 2 Results of microscopic analyses and PCR for detection of Toxocara cati larvae in tissue samples of BALB/c mice sacrificed from day 1 to 28th after artificial infection


Although the life cycles of most helminths of zoonotic importance are well known, there are still major gaps in our knowledge especially in the fields of Toxocara species infection. In 1956, the life cycle of T. cati was first described by Dr. Sprent [22]. He argued that the life cycle of T. cati includes parthenic hosts that acquires infection by consuming larval in the tissues of the intermediate hosts. He also discussed the larvae were found in the liver, lungs and muscles after first week of infection, but did not reach the alimentary tract.

In the first part of the present study, by counting the number of larvae per gram of tissue, we have shown that toxocariasis caused by T. cati in BALB/c mice presents a dynamics that is very similar to the infection by this helminth or by T. canis in BALB/c mice [13, 23]. It has been shown that tissue digestion and conventional evaluation such as microscopic observations could remain a reliable tool for the diagnosis of toxocariasis in affected mice, given that they recovered large quantities of larvae during the course of the experimentally infection [24,25,26,27,28]. In BALB/c mice, orally infected with 2500 larval eggs, parasite larvae were detected for the first time in the liver at day 1 and the recovery time in the tissues continued until the day twenty-eighth. The number of larvae in the tissues decreased continuously from day 3 after infection so that no larvae recovered on day 28 after inoculation. Therefore, due to our data, it can be said that the acute phase of the disease occurred around day 7 and recovery between days 14 and 28 after inoculation. A similar kinetic has been described in male Wistar rats and Mongolian gerbil [5]. On day 14 of the experiment, the larvae were found in the lungs, heart and the kidneys and this coincided with their disappearance from the liver. These findings coincide with those of Prokopic and Figallova [29] who used a dose of 2500 T. canis embryonated eggs and Sprent [22] with a dose of 5000 T. cati eggs. The research results revealed that hatching of T. cati eggs in mouse intestines is faster than that of T. canis eggs. In a study using a dose of 2000 T. cati embryonated eggs, higher concentrations of larvae were found in the liver on the first day post-inoculation and in the lungs on days 2 and 3 post-inoculation. Also, in a similar survey by Hrckova et al. [30] using a dose of 1000 T. cati embryonated eggs and starting the study 4 h post-inoculation, recovered larvae in the liver as from 12 h post-inoculation and the maximum count was estimated on day 3 post-inoculation, the same as in the lungs.

One of our main goals was to compare the sensitivity of the conventional method of microscopic observation of the parasite with the PCR technique performed with specific primer. According to our previous study, primer species pairs that were able to detect parasite DNA in tissues were used [21]. The use of a special primer pair can increase the ability of PCR assays for parasite DNA. Regarding this issue, assessment of T. cati larvae were consistently positive from days 1 to 28 after experimental infection. Due to the higher sensitivity of PCR, and its comparison with conventional approaches to diagnosing infections, including helminth diseases [31], earlier detection of the parasite using PCR was expected. The very high infectious inoculation that has been used can be considered as the reason for the lack of significant differences in methods. This probably caused a large number of larvae to migrate simultaneously, which also reached microscopically detectable levels. However, it is important to note that T. cati is present in the host liver after 5 days of inoculation [5]. If migrating, their presence in tissue samples can be detected by PCR. The fact that PCR was positive throughout the recovery period while the microscopic method was only positive for inoculation at the beginning indicates that PCR assay is a better choice when the prevalence of infection or intensity of infection is low [32, 33]. Interestingly, the more intense parasite DNA amplification bands coincided with the highest amount of parasite larvae in the tissues. A similar correlation of parasite specific DNA and amount of parasite larvae was described using a PCR–RFLP to evaluate parasite in tissue samples of BALB/c mice infected with T. canis [33].

In the current study, the 600 bp band was derived from mice tissues DNA, which was confirmed by testing positive DNA samples. In the early stage of the infection, it was interesting not to observe the 600 bp band in some of the tissue samples, as larval DNAs were expected to be present in all specimens. A possible explanation for this finding could be a differential tendency of the genus primer pair for animals experimentally infected and parasite DNA. In this regard, it could be assume that this primer pair would be have a much higher affinity for T. cati larvae DNA than mice DNA. Undoubtedly, a visual inspection at the agarose gel documented in the figure confirms this possibility. For example, from lanes 1 to 4, very strong 600 bp bands are present. On the other hand, during later periods of infection, when the number of larvae is already decreasing, weaker 600 bp band is appears.

In the second part of the current study, we investigated if the tissue migration path of the larvae in BALB/c mice was similar to the observed in other rodents. We also tried to demonstrate that PCR performed with a genus-specific primer was more sensitive than traditional digestion and microscopic observation to detect larval migration in different tissues. The analysis of digested tissues and microscope examination showed that from the gastrointestinal luman site the larvae penetrated through circulation to the liver and then reached the lungs and other organs. This hepatic and pulmonary stage occurred within 24 h of infection.

Cardillo et al., [8] showed that T. cati causes considerable brain lesions in BALB/C on days 4 to 28 after inoculation and Zibaei et al., [5] reported through the study of brain tissue the importance of T. cati as causal agent of neurotoxocariasis. In addition, it has been shown recently Toxocara is included among one of the most common nematodal infections of the central nervous system [34]. This helminth is more commonly associated with seizure, dementia, or behaviour disorders mimicking primary psychiatric diseases [35]. One of the interesting aspects of the present study was the absence of larvae on microscopic examination during migration into brain tissue, while in the molecular assay a weakly band of 600 bp was detected in the brain tissue on the 28th day post-inoculation. Thus, we believe that the PCR we described will provide better performance in evaluating the detection of T. cati larvae in tissue samples from brain of infected mice.


The present study faced limitations such as resource constraints and lack of access to sequencing tests. Molecular testing with high sensitivity/specificity has been done to overcome some limitations. In addition, the migration pattern of T. cati larvae on carcasses and eyes will be investigated in the future studies.


Finally, the results of the present study demonstrated that the experimental infection with T. cati in BALB/c mice presents the same kinetics as other rodents. This can be better characterized by PCR with a specific primer than by microscopic observation of larvae after tissue digestion. In addition, these findings also showed that simultaneous classical parasitological analysis and PCR with the genus primers were to most extent sensitive to detect parasites in different tissues.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. More complete data and information are provided in the supplement file according to the STROBE checklist (Additional file 2).



Base pairs


Covet toxocariasis


Genomic DNA


National institutes of health




Ocular larva migrans


Polymerase chain reaction


Restriction fragment length polymorphism

T. canis :

Toxocara canis

T. cati :

Toxocara cati


Visceral larva migrans


  1. French AF, Castillo-Alcala F, Gedye KR, Roe WD, Gartrell BD. Nematode larva migrans caused by Toxocara cati in the North Island brown kiwi (Apteryx mantelli). Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020;11:221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rostami A, Sepidarkish M, Ma G, Wang T, Ebrahimi M, Fakhri Y, et al. Global prevalence of Toxocara infection in cats. Adv Parasitol. 2020;109:615–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strube C, Heuer L, Janecek E. Toxocara spp. infections in paratenic hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:375–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubinský P, Havasiová-Reiterová K, Petko B, Hovorka I, Tomasovicová O. Role of small mammals in the epidemiology of toxocariasis. Parasitol. 1995;10:187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zibaei M, Sadjjadi SM, Uga S. Experimental Toxocara cati infection in gerbils and rats. Korean J Parasitol. 2010;48:331–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma G, Holland CV, Wang T, Hofmann A, Fan CK, Maizels RM, et al. Human toxocariasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:e14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rai SK, Uga S, Wu Z, Takahashi Y, Matsumura T. Use of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of toxocariasis: an experimental study. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997;28:541–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardillo N, Rosa A, Ribicich M, López C, Sommerfelt I. Experimental infection with Toxocara cati in BALB/c mice, migratory behaviour and pathological changes. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56:198–205.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bakhshani A, Khodaverdi M, Borji H. Distribution of Toxocara cati larvae in experimentally infected BALB/c mice. Vet Parasitol. 2020;285:109220.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Strube C, Waindok P, Raulf MK, Springer A. Toxocara-induced neural larva migrans (neurotoxocarosis) in rodent model hosts. Adv Parasitol. 2020;109:189–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Epe C, Sabel T, Schnieder T, Stoye M. The behavior and pathogenicity of Toxacara canis larvae in mice of different strains. Parasitol Res. 1994;80:691–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zibaei M, Sadjjadi SM, Karamian M, Uga S, Oryan A, Jahadi-Hosseini SH. A comparative histopathology, serology and molecular study, on experimental ocular toxocariasis by Toxocara cati in Mongolian gerbils and Wistar rats. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:109580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fonseca GRE, Santos SVD, Chieffi PP, Paula FM, Gryschek RCB, Lescano SAZ. Experimental toxocariasis in BALB/c mice: relationship between parasite inoculum and the IgG immune response. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017;112:382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruiz-Manzano RA, Hernández-Cervantes R, Del Río-Araiza VH, Palacios-Arreola MI, Nava-Castro KE, Morales-Montor J. Immune response to chronic Toxocara canis infection in a mice model. Parasite Immunol. 2019;1:e12672.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bowman DD. History of Toxocara and the associated larva migrans. Adv Parasitol. 2020;109:17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasser RB. PCR-based technology in veterinary parasitology. Vet Parasitol. 1999;84:229–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodrigues E, Fonseca G, Baptista de Melo G, Martins de Paula F, Mello Malta F, Borges Gryschek RC, et al. Toxocara DNA amplification in serum and tissue samples in BALB/c mice. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2021;246:111429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gasser RB. A perfect time to harness advanced molecular technologies to explore the fundamental biology of Toxocara species. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:353–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raissi V, Mohebali M, Kia EB, RahimiForoushani A, Sohrabi N, Rokni MB, et al. Expression of mir-21 and mir-103a in Toxocara canis: potential for diagnosis of human toxocariasis. Iran J Parasitol. 2020;15:559–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zibaei M, Uga S. Modified method to enhanced recovery of Toxocara cati larvae for the purposes of diagnostic and therapeutic. Exp Parasitol. 2016;169:107–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zibaei M, Sadjjadi SM, Maraghi S. The occurrence of Toxocara species in naturally infected broiler chickens revealed by molecular approaches. J Helminthol. 2017;91:633–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sprent JF. The life history and development of Toxocara cati (Schrank 1788) in the domestic cat. Parasitol. 1956;46:54–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolbeková P, Větvička D, Svoboda J, Skírnisson K, Leissová M, Syrůček M. Toxocara canis larvae reinfecting BALB/c mice exhibit accelerated speed of migration to the host CNS. Parasitol Res. 2011;109:1267–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubey JP. Migration of Toxocara cati larvae in mice. Trop Geogr Med. 1968;20:172–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holland CV, Cox DM. Toxocara in the mouse: a model for parasite-altered host behaviour? J Helminthol. 2001;75:125–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taira K, Saitoh Y, Kapel CM. Toxocara cati larvae persist and retain high infectivity in muscles of experimentally infected chickens. Vet Parasitol. 2011;180:287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taira K, Yanagida T, Akazawa N, Saitoh Y. High infectivity of Toxocara cati larvae from muscles of experimentally infected rats. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196:397–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Okada N, Ooi HK, Taira K. Toxocara cati larval migration to mouse fetuses through transplacental infection. Vet Parasitol. 2021;90:109350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prokopic J, Figallová V. Migration of some roundworm species in experimentally infected white mice. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1982;29:309–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hrckova G, Velebny S, Tomasovicova O, Medved’ova M, Pajersky A. Pathomorphological changes in mice infected with Toxocara cati following administration of fenbendazole and glucan. Acta Parasitol. 2001;46:313–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roeber F, Jex AR, Gasser RB. Next-generation molecular-diagnostic tools for gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants: a turning point? Adv Parasitol. 2013;83:267–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Shibata M, Nguyen YTH, Hayata Y, Nonaka N, Maruyama H, et al. Development of nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati and Ascaris suum contamination in meat and organ meats. Parasitol Int. 2018;67:622–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Özbakış G, Doğanay A. Visceral larva migrans detection using PCR-RFLP in BALB/c mice infected with Toxocara canis. J Helminthol. 2019;94:e70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee KP, Shen PC, Shih YC, Chou CM, Tsai CS, Sun YT, et al. The first two cases of neurotoxocariasis in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:1520–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eberhardt O, Bialek R, Nägele T, Dichgans J. Eosinophilic meningomyelitis in toxocariasis: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005;107:432–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We sincerely thank the technical supports of the Parasitology Laboratory staffs of Alborz University of Medical Sciences and Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The results described in this paper formed part of a master of sciences student thesis.


The authors state that they have not received any funding or grants to write and publish the results of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MN, MZ, and AH performed the collection of samples. MN, MZ, FF, and ZH performed the molecular detection of the target genes. MN, MZ, and AH were the project coordinator and participated in all parts of the work. MN, MZ wrote the manuscript following discussions with AH. MZ, AH, FF, ES and KT revised the paper and improved the technical quality of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammad Zibaei or Ali Haniloo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from the owner or legal custodian of all animals described in this study for the procedures undertaken. The ethical statement of this study was approved and written by the Ethical Committee for Zanjan University of Medical Sciences with the code of IR.ZUMS.REC.1400.133. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This project was partially supported by the Vice Chancellor for Research of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences by the code A-10–95-14.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additionalfile 1:

Supplementary Fig. 2. Full-length gel images of PCR assay. (A) Representative results of polyacrylamidegel electrophoresis (1%) PCR products amplified from digested tissue samples ofinfected groups. The present study confirms that Toxocara cati larvaereached tissues from the alimentary canal. Molecular size marker 100kb (M) andlanes 1 to 4 indicate samples from the liver, lungs, heart, kidneys tissueswith DNA 600 bp. Lane 5 provide the presence a small amounts of DNA in the braintissue on the 28th day post-inoculation. (B) Result of polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis of PCR products amplified from tissue samples of control group.The findings of the study showed that the tissues are free of Toxocara catilarvae. The negative control (NC) without DNA and positive control (PC) withstandard DNA 600 bp, lanes 1 to 5 represents tissue samples from the liver,lungs, heart, kidneys, and brain.

Additional file 2

. STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be includedin reports of cross-sectional studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naderbandi, M., Zibaei, M., Haniloo, A. et al. Larva migrans in BALB/c mice experimentally infected with Toxocara cati ensured by PCR assay. BMC Vet Res 18, 257 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Toxocara cati
  • Larva Migrans
  • BALB/c mice
  • Microscopic larvae count
  • PCR