Skip to main content

Bacterial and parasite co-infection in Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) by Aeromonas bestiarum, Aeromonas sobria, Plesiomonas shigelloides and Ichthyobodo necator

Abstract

Background

Bacterial infections are responsible of high economic losses in aquaculture. Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) is a threatened native trout species that has been introduced in aquaculture both for species conservation and breeding for production and for which no studies of bacterial infections have been reported.

Case presentation

Fish from juvenile stages of Mexican golden trout showed an infectious outbreak in a farm in co-culture with rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), showing external puntiform red lesions around the mouth and caudal pedunculus resembling furuncles by Aeromonas spp. and causing an accumulated mortality of 91%. Isolation and molecular identification of bacteria from lesions and internal organs showed the presence of Aeromonas bestiarum, Aeromonas sobria, Plesiomonas shigelloides and Ichthyobodo necator isolated from a single individual. All bacterial isolates were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazoline. P. shigelloides was resistant to third generation β-lactamics.

Conclusions

This is the first report of coinfection by Aeromonas bestiarum, Aeromonas sobria, Plesiomonas shigelloides and Ichthyobodo necator in an individual of Mexican golden trout in co-culture with rainbow trout. Resistance to β-lactams suggests the acquisition of genetic determinants from water contamination by human- or livestock-associated activities.

Highlights

  1. 1.

    This is the first report of a coinfection by Aeromonas bestiarum, Aeromonas sobria, Plesiomonas shigelloides and the ectoparasite Ichthyobodo necator in a Mexican golden trout (Oncorynchus chrysogaster), a threatened native species.

  2. 2.

    The antibiotic resistance profiles suggest the influence of the water source contaminated by human activities.

Background

Mexico has a high diversity of endemic trout species which are considered the most southerly salmonids compared to the natural distribution of other salmonids [13]. Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) is a native species living at heights greater than 1900 m over the sea level, in the basins of the Sinaloa, Culiacán and El Fuerte rivers in the Sierra Madre Occidental in México. Mexican golden trout is the most important source of food protein for surrounding human populations [1, 4]. Mexican golden trout is considered either a threatened or a near threatened native species by International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) [4] or national NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 [5] regulatory organisms, respectively. The threatened condition is due to deforestation, habitat degradation, climate change and overexploitation [2]. Another threat for Mexican golden trout is the current hybridization with an exotic salmonid, the rainbow trout (Oncorynchus mykiss) which is considered one of the more harmful to native fish exotic species [4, 6].

The genetic background of native trout provides this species with a unique adaptation to environment that are not favourable to other salmonids, so commercial breeding programs have been proposed [1, 2] to avoid loss of genetic background for the native species [7, 8]. Important threats for aquaculture are also illnesses; accounting for 50% of the decrease in production, being those caused by bacteria the most significant [9, 10].

Aeromonas spp. are important pathogens for aquaculture [11]. They are Gram-negative, oxidase positive bacilli [12]. All species but A. media and A. salmonicida are motil due to the presence of a polar flagellum and all are ubiquitous of brackish water and freshwaters [13]. A. salmonicida, A. hydrophila, A. caviae, A. veroniibiovar sobria,A. veronii biovar veronii, A. dhakensis,A. encheleia, A. allosaccharophila,A. schubertii, A. bestiarum, A. sobria, A. piscicola and A. jandaeihave been reported as pathogens in fish culture [1416]. Particularly important are A. hydrophila, A. caviae and A. veronii which cause sepsis and ulcerative syndrome with a high economic impact on production [17]. A. salmonicida has been recognized as the causal agent of the so-called “Ulcer disease” or “Red-Sore disease” [18] which may reach mortalities to about 90% in fish farms [19]. To date, there are no reports of Aeromonas spp.-related disease in Mexican golden trout.

Plesiomonas shigelloides is also a Gram-negative, oxidase positive, motile Enterobacteriaceae [20]. Along with Aeromonas spp. and Fusobacterium mortiferum, they are common pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of freshwater fish from orders Perciformes (Micropterus salmoides, Lepomi macrochirus), Siluriformes (Hypostomus auroguttatus, Ictalurus punctatus, Pimeolodus maculatus), Salmoniformes (O. mykiss) and Characiformes (Prochilodus argenteus) among others [2123]. In rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) P. shigelloides infections has been associated with thin, weak, 1-2 year old fish showing yellowish exudate from anus, petechiae and ascites in internal organs and 40% mortality [24]. In grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) P. shigelloides causes muscular erosion [25] while in silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) 60% mortality showing exophthalmia and diffuse haemorrhagic spots [26]. In ornamental cichlids P. shigelloides may cause up to 100% mortality [27].

Infestations by parasites from the genus Ichthyobodo, have been reported in salmonids from the genus Oncorhynchus [9, 2833]. In particular, Ichthyobodo necator can cause mortalities of up to 40% [28, 32]. Fish showing Ichthyobodosis usually show a grayish layer over the skin, loss of epidermis and small ulcers, which have been related to secondary infections [34]. The goal of the present study was to identify bacteria associated with an apparent outbreak of Red-Sore disease in a farm cultivating both Mexican golden trout and rainbow trout.

Case presentation

Case history

In a rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) production farm in the municipality of Pucuato, in the State of Michoacán de Ocampo, México, located at 1939’N, 10045’O and 2,511 m.a.s.l., Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) is also cultivated as an experimental approach for domestication and farming. Rainbow trout is cultivated in concrete tanks fed with water from the “El Retranque” dam in Pucuato. This facility also contains an experimental area with PVC gutters and glass aquariums. The water source for this area is from a spring shared with the nearest human settlement in the town of Pucuato. In September, 2019, the experimental Mexican golden trout showed an outbreak of an infectious disease with a duration of 35 days that caused 91% of accumulated mortality, with 12 of 131 individuals surviving. On the 33rd day, 6 specimens were collected with mean lengths and weighs of 11.33 cm and 53.9 g, respectively. The specimens were transported to the laboratory alive for clinical descriptions of pathological signs and microbiological analysis. Specimens showed normal swimming with preferent location at the borders of the container. Red and inflamed lesions were observed in the abdomen and mouth, fins were haemorrhagic and gills were inflamed with petechiae (Fig. 1). An ectoparasite, Ichthyobodo necator, was identified from fresh samples of skin and gills. Stomachs showed low content of chyme. The bowel showed either soft brown (4 individuals) or gelatinous yellow (2 individuals) faeces. Gallbladders were yellow. Spleens with black spots, abnormal firmness and presence of fat. Kidneys showed mild inflammation, abnormal firmness and in one individual it was necrotic. For microbiological analysis, samples from skin, inflamed fins, gelatinous faeces, kidney, spleen, brain, heart and gallbladder were collected with a cotton swab [35] and plated in rich (Soybean Trypticase, Brain-Heart Infusion) and selective (McConkey, Salmonella-Shigella, Cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin – CIN -, Cetrimide, Glutamate-starch-phenol red – GSP - and Sabourad) solid culture media. Isolates were obtained from rich media and GSP agar which is a selective medium for Aeromonas spp. Since signs were similar to Red Sore Disease, we proceed to analyse only GSP agar isolates for the search of Aeromonas spp.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lesions in Mexican golden trout. External lesions: a Ulcer and grayish layer over the skin; b Mouth lesion and scale loss; c Skin ulcer in peduncle. Internal lesions. d Kidney inflammation with abnormal firmness; e necrotic kidney; f gelatinous yellow faeces and spleen presenting black spots; g stomach with low food content Arrows point to the lesions

At the 3rd,5th and 7th day of the beginning of the outbreak, the volume of water in the tanks was reduced to 50% and 25 ml/l of 10% of commercial aldehyde product (Paraguard, Seachem) were added. On day 8 and 10, 25mg/l of kanamycin sulfate (Kanaplex, Seachem) was applied. From days 12th to 16th, 20 mg/l of a mixture of Sulfamethoxypyridacin (125 mg), Trimethoprim (25 mg) and tylosine (30 mg) per g of product (Koryn Triple, Tornel). On days 17 to 19, Kanaplex was applied again but mixed with 10 g/l NaCl. From days 21 to 28, oxytetracycline (20 mg/kg of fish weight) was applied until mortality stopped. Florfenicol (Florfen 10, Preveson) 10 mg/kg of live weight was then incorporated in the food for 6 additional days, until fish do not take the food anymore.

Bacterial isolation was performed as described in Whitman et al. (2004). Liver, spleen and kidney from five individuals with Red Sore disease signs were aseptically collected and samples were inoculated in GSP culture medium which is selective for the genus Aeromonas. Yellow colonies formed by Gram-negative oxidase positive bacilli were further analysed for motility and glucose fermentation. Isolates that fit to Aeromonas spp. phenotype were stored in Brain-Heart infusion (BHI) added with 15% glycerol at -75C for further characterization. Molecular identification of presumptive Aeromonas spp. isolates was performed by sequencing an 820 bp fragment from rpoD gene [36]. Sequences were obtained from Macrogen (Korea) and assembled with Unipro UGENE v39.0 sequence assembly software v5.15 [37]. Sequences were registered under GenBank numbers MZ668583 (RSDI-X6), MZ668586 (RSDI-P6), MZ668585 (RSDI-R6) and MZ668584 (RSDI-Q6). Similarity search was performed with Basic Local Alignment Research Tool (BLAST) at the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI, USA). Four bacterial isolates were obtained. Two of them correspond to Aeromonas bestiarum isolated from oral lesion (RSDI-X6) and spleen (RSDI-P6) with 99.27% and 99.05% of sequence identity for each sequence. One isolate (RSDI-R6) sequence was 98.61% identical to Aeromonas sobria isolated from kidney, and the last one (RSDI-Q6) showed also 99.29% identity with a P. shigelloides sequence and was isolated from spleen. Isolates RSDI-P6, RSDI-R6 and RSDI-Q6 were recovered from the same individual. To assess evolutionary relatedness of the bacterial species, a similarity tree (Fig. 2) was constructed using MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) version X software [38]. Evolutionary relatedness was inferred using the Neighbour joining method [39]. Confidence values were estimated with a bootstrap test with 1000 replicates [40] and evolutionary distances with the Kimura-2 parameter method [41]. Figure 2 shows strong evolutionary relatedness of our A.bestiarum (RSDI-X6, RSDI-P6, 100% of confidence) and A. sobria(RSDI-R6, 100% of confidence) isolates with reference sequences. Isolate RSDI-Q6 identified as P. shigelloides, also associated with a reference sequence with 100% of confidence.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Similarity tree of bacterial isolates. Black dots represent the position in the tree of the isolates reported in this work. Numbers in each node are the confidence values. Distance bar is the number of nucleotide substitutions per site

Antimicrobial sensitivity tests were performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, USA) manuals M45 and M100 for disk diffusion tests [42, 43]. Isolates were tested against 21 antibiotics at their specified concentration (Table 1). Briefly, 24 h cultures at 28C were adjusted to an OD610nm of 0.5-0.7 and plated with a cotton swab in Muller-Hinton agar over which sensidiscs (Oxoid) were placed. After 24h, the inhibition zone was measured with a Vernier calibrator. The three Aeromonas spp. isolates were resistant or intermediate resistant to Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin and cefoxitin. RSDI-X6 and RSDI-P6 A. bestiarum isolates were resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam while A. sobria (RSDI-R6) showed intermediate susceptibility. The three Aeromonas spp. Isolates were resistant to carbapenems (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem). Aeromonas spp. Isolates were sensitive to cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime sodium, aztreonam, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol.

Table 1 Antibiotic sensitivity test results

P. shigelloides (RSDI-Q6) isolate showed resistance to cefazolin, cefotaxime, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, intermediate resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftazidime and meropenem, and was sensitive to the rest of the antibiotics.

For the identification of ectoparasites, wet mount examination of gill clips and skin scrapes taken from several sites on the fish were examined by light microscopy. I. necatorwas identified in skins and gills samples. Due to the high mortality rate and the late moment in which samples were collected for analysis, it was not possible to analyse healthy fish from this outbreak for the search of ectoparasites. However, in august 2018, in sick rainbow trouts from the same farm, A. hydrophila, A. sobria, or A. allosaccharophyla were isolated from internal organs, but no ectoparasites were observed. In December 2018, neither of the above-mentioned bacteria nor ectoparasites, were found in healthy fish from the same farm.

Discussion and conclusions

Although Mexican golden trout is an endangered species ongoing transition to commercial exploitation, no research is available on its bacterial pathogens. This is the first report of coinfection of Mexican golden trout with A. bestiarum, A. sobria, P. shigelloides and the ectoparasite Ichthyobodo necator.

I. necator is a common parasite of the genus Oncorhynchus, infesting species such as O. mykiss, O. tshawytscha, O. masou, O. gorbuscha, O. ketay O. nerka [9, 2833]. In this report, A. bestiarum RSDI-X6 was isolated from an external lesion. Epithelial destruction by ectoparasites causes an imbalance in osmoregulation followed by hyperplasia and lamellar fusion of the gills followed by respiratory malfunction [28, 44]. Synergistic effects of ectoparasites and bacteria co-infecting salmonids, have been described [4547], but has also been suggested that ectoparasites may act as vectors of bacteria in fish infections [4850]. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate that I. necator has a role as a vector of bacterial infections in Mexican golden trout.

Aeromonas spp. are well known to cause high mortality in salmonids [18, 51].In the aquatic environment, fish are exposed to a great variety of pathogens [52] with co-infections as a factor increasing susceptibility [53]. Co-infections can be a challenge for diagnosis and treatment [52]. To the best of our knowledge, there is only a report on bacterial co-infections for the genus Oncorhynchus. In a study of pathogen prevalence in Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) several bacterial pathogens were identified, but a significant association was only observed for Renibacterium salmoninarum and aeromonads; R. salmoninarum and A. salmonicida were the most abundant pathogens with prevalence values about 25% and 15%, respectively [54]. Bacterial co-infections are common in other fish species in aquaculture and may alter prevalence, severity and impact on fish disease or success of vaccination strategies due to the synergistic effect of the pathogens [53]. In Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), co-infections have been described with Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus iniae, Francisella noatunensissubsp. orientalis, A. hydrophila, P. shigelloidesand Edwardsiella tarda [55].

A. bestiarum, A. sobriaand P. shigelloides identified in Mexican golden trout in this work, are common inhabitants of aquatic ecosystems. Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloidesare also considered as emergent pathogens of intestinal and extraintestinal diseases [5658]. Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloides were previously isolated from fish, amphibians, molluscs, crustaceans, reptiles and mammals [12, 5961]. Aeromonas spp. have been proposed as indicators of the presence and development of microbial resistance to antibiotics both in fish farms and natural environment, and as a potential source of transmission of resistance determinants to human pathogens, as they are zoonotic [58, 62]. Aeromonas spp. are also commonly found in vegetables, foods of animal origin, faeces of animal and human origin and contaminated water as important sources of transmission to humans [63]. In intestinal outbreaks, frozen foods or insufficiently cooked meals have also been associated with Aeromonas spp. transmission [64]. In some foods, Aeromonas spp. cell densities may reach up to 105 bacteria ·g−1 or ml−1 [57]. Due to the presence of antimicrobial resistance, virulence and biofilm producing gene markers in isolates from aquaculture and abattoir environments, Aeromonas spp. are becoming good indicators of water and food quality [65, 66].

P. shigelloides, previously classified as Aeromonas shigelloides, share several features with Aeromonas spp. It is also commonly found in foods of animal and plant origin [57]. P. shigelloides has high clinical relevance because it has been ranked as the third and fourth causes of gastroenteritis in Nigeria and China, respectively [67, 68], being water its most common source of transmission [64]. P. shigelloides may grow easily in a great variety of foods [57]. Ingestion of seafoods as oysters and uncooked fish meals have been associated with outbreaks of P. shigelloides infections [64]. So, since Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloides are both considered as good indicators of food contamination and as emergent pathogens in aquaculture, the finding of these two pathogens in co-infection in an outbreak in Mexican golden trout suggest external contamination of water sources.

In this report three of the Aeromonas spp. isolates from Mexican golden trout were resistant to β-lactamic antibiotics, particularly to first and second generation cephalosporins (cefazolin and cefoxitin) and β-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanic acid and sulbactam). Amoxicillin and ampicillin resistance were also reported for rainbow trout (O. mykiss), tilapia (O. mossambicus) and Koi carp (Cyprinus carpio) Aeromonas spp. isolates in South Africa [69]. Resistance to β-lactams have been increasing in Aeromonas spp. from clinical and environmental origin [70, 71]. In México, Aeromonas spp. isolates from rainbow trout contained extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) encoding genes (bla SHV y bla CphA/IMIS) [72]. Aeromonas spp. isolates from this report were susceptible to third generation cephalosporins and monobactam, suggesting the absence of ESBL gene determinants, as has been reported for trout, tilapia and Koi carp isolates [69]. Susceptibility to monobactams, tetracyclines, quinolones and phenicols in our Aeromonas spp. isolates are in accordance with a previous study [12].

Our Plesiomonas shigelloidesisolate showed resistance and intermediate resistance to cefotaxime, ceftazidime respectively, third generation cephalosporins for which ESBL bacteria are resistant. ESBLs are common in Escherichia coliand other Enterobacteriaceae [73], which were found in isolates from intestinal samples in fish from India and Switzerland [74, 75]. Since third generation cephalosporins are not commonly recommended for treatment of bacterial infections in aquaculture, it is possible that ESBL genetic determinants may be mobilizing from contaminating enterobacteria from the environment that are horizontally transferring their genes to P. shigelloides. High prevalence of cephalosporin resistant P. shigelloides suggest also high level of contamination of water [76], although isolates from other sources (humans, dogs, aquarium) were susceptible to cephalosporins [77]. P. shigelloides isolate RSDI-Q6 also showed intermediate resistance to β-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) and a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin). Resistance to a wide variety of β-lactams in P. shigelloidesisolates is common [78]. This result is in contrast to that reported for P. shigelloides isolates from tilapia which were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftazidime and gentamicin [79]. These same authors also reported resistance to tetracycline and chloramphenicol, for which our isolate was susceptible. Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloides isolates in this work were either resistant or intermediate-resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin, a β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor, a first-generation cephalosporin and carbapenems. Neither of these antibiotics are approved by the Food and Drug Administration from USA which are also applied in Mexican regulations, so genetic resistance may be acquired from other bacterial species from animal or human origin contaminating the water. Although it has been suggested that there may be some intrinsic resistance to these antibiotics for these species [79]; evidence is also reported that describe sensitive and resistant isolates both from clinical and environmental origin [80] for Aeromonas spp. It is suggested that variation in antimicrobial susceptibility may be due to different genetic backgrounds in the environment and the selective pressures by antibiotics contaminating the water sources [70], reinforcing the hypothesis that antibiotic resistance determinants in bacteria from aquatic environments may be a consequence of anthropogenic contamination [62]. The presence of Aeromonas spp. showing antibiotic resistance may be used as indicators of contamination in vulnerable aquatic environments [81]. According to this, presence of integrons and other mobile genetic elements are frequently found that encode antibiotic resistance determinants in Aeromonas spp. [82]. Antibiotics are commonly used in anthropogenic activities related to aquaculture, animal production and even in treatment of companion animals, so its presence is frequent in the environment and they become a risk for public health [83, 84]. Resistance to antibiotics not commonly used in aquaculture is also frequent in other fish pathogenic bacteria [85]. Antimicrobial resistance is considered an important health risk in aquaculture [86], particularly for Mexican golden trout and their cross breeds due to their threatened condition. This particular threat for Mexican golden trout is added to others as geographic isolation, habitat transformation, chemical contamination from pesticides and industrial and mining activities in the surrounding environment [87, 88].

This report describes the co-infection of Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloides in a Mexican golden trout operation and outlines their antibiotic resistance to β-lactams and third generation cephalosporines which suggests an infection from contaminated waters. Due to the emerging importance of these bacterial species as environmental quality markers and as emergent zoonotic pathogens, it is important to make a continuous surveillance of these pathogens in aquaculture. To complement surveillance, it is necessary to perform studies on the presence of virulence factors, haemagglutination patterns, infectivity in cellular models, and biofilm forming abilities, among others, to better understand the pathogenic potential of each isolate. Studies with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [89] and macro-restriction analysis in pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) [90] will also help to understand Aeromonads pathogen diversity and the possible relation of particular clones as human or fish pathogens or as environmental strains [91]. Comparative genome analysis of our Aeromonas spp. and P. shigelloides isolates against others from different sources will also allow understanding differences in pathogenic potential and host specificity and how are they contributing to the co-infection process.

Availability of data and materials

All data related to this study are included in this manuscript. Sequences obtained in the present study are available in the GenBank repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore) under accession numbers: MZ668583 (RSDI-X6), MZ668586 (RSDI-P6), MZ668585 (RSDI-R6) and MZ668584 (RSDI-Q6).

Abbreviations

GSP:

Glutamate Starch Phenol red

BHI:

Brain-heart infusion

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

IUCN:

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases

References

  1. Hendrickson DA, Neely DA, Mayden RL, Anderson K, Brooks JE, Camarena RF, et al.Conservation of Mexican native trout and the discovery, status, protection and recovery of the Conchos trout, the first native In: Lozano VMDL, Contreras BAJ, editors. Studies of North American desert fishes in honor of E.P. (Phil) Pister conservationist. Faculty of Biological Sciences. Mexico: Autonomous University of Nuevo León: 2006. p. 162–201.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barriga SIA, Arredondo FJL, Ingle MG, García L FJ. Estrategias acuícolas para la conservación de trucha nativa: primeras experiencias. 2016. http://cibnor.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1001/1364. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  3. Ruiz LA, Hernández GR, García DLFJ, Ramírez HAL. Potential distribution of endangered Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) in the Rio Sinaloa and Rio Culiacan basins (Sierra Madre Occidental) based on landscape characterization and species distribution models. Environ Biol Fish. 2017; 100:981–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0624-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hendrickson D, Tomelleri JR. Oncorhynchus chrysogaster. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019. 2019. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/142674122/145641611 Accessed 7 Jan 2020.

  5. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. 2010. https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5173091. Accessed 3 Jan 2020.

  6. Global Invasive Species Database. 2020. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/speciesname/Oncorhynchus+mykiss. Accessed 08 Feb 2020.

  7. McGinnity P, Prodöhl P, Ferguson A, Hynes R, Maoiléidigh NÓ, Baker N, et al.Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc R Soc Lond. 2003; 270(1532):2443–50. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Escalante MA, García De León FJ, Dillman CB, De los Santos CAB, George A, Barriga SIÁ. Introgresión genética de la trucha arcoíris exótica en poblaciones de trucha dorada mexicana In: García-De León FJ, editor. La trucha dorada mexicana. México: CIAD-CIBNOR: 2016. p. 125–36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meyers TR. First report of erythrocytic inclusion body syndrome (EIBS) in chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha in Alaska, USA. Dis Aquat Org. 2007; 76(2):169–72. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao076169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Assefa A, Abunna F. Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: Review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish. Vet Med Int. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5432497.

  11. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Major bacterial diseases affecting aquaculture. 2016. http://www.fao.org/fi/static-media/MeetingDocuments/WorkshopAMR/presentations/07_Haenen.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  12. Janda JM, Abbott SL. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23(1):35–73. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00039-09.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrarathna HPSU, Nikapitiya C, Dananjaya SHS, Wijerathne CUB, Wimalasena SHMP, Kwun HJ, et al.Outcome of co-infection with opportunistic and multidrug resistant Aeromonas hydrophila and A. veronii in zebrafish: Identification, characterization, pathogenicity and immune responses. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018; 80:573–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.06.049.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Esteve C, Gutiérrez MC, Ventosa A. Aeromonas encheleia sp. nov., isolated from European eels. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1995; 45(3):462–6. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-3-462.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Austin B, Austin DA. Bacterial fish pathogens: disease of farmed and wild fish, 6th ed: Springer; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32674-0.

  16. Zepeda VAP, Vega SV, Ortega SC, Rubio GM, Oca MDM, Soriano VE. Pathogenicity of Mexican isolates of Aeromonas sp. in immersion experimentally-infected rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792). Acta Tropica. 2017; 169:122–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaix G, Roger F, Berthe T, Lamy B, Jumas-Bilak E, Lafite R, et al.Distinct Aeromonas populations in water column and associated with copepods from estuarine environment (seine, France). Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:1259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01259.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Menanteau-Ledouble S, Kumar G, Saleh M, El-Matbouli M. Aeromonas salmonicida: updates on an old acquaintance. Dis Aquat Org. 2016; 120(1):49–68. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kırkan Ş, Göksoy EÖ, Kaya O. Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas salmonicida in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Turkey hatchery farms. J Vet Med. 2003; 50(7):339–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00671.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Janda JM, Abbott SL, McIver CJ. Plesiomonas shigelloides revisited. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 29(2):349–74. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00103-15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva FCP, Brito MFG, Farías LM, Nicoli JR. Composition and antagonistic activity of the indigenous intestinal microbiota of Prochilodus argenteus Agassiz. J Fish Biol. 2005; 67(6):1686–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00877.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duarte S, Zauli DAG, Nicoli JR, Araújo FG. Gram-negative intestinal indigenous microbiota from two Siluriform fishes in a tropical reservoir. Braz J Microbiol. 2014; 45(4):1283–92. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822014000400019.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Larsen AM, Mohammed HH, Arias CR. Characterization of the gut microbiota of three commercially valuable warmwater fish species. J Appl Microbiol. 2014; 116(6):1396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12475.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cruz JM, Saraiva A, Eiras JC, Branco R, Sousa JC. An outbreak of Plesiomonas shigelloides in farmed rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, in Portugal. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol. 1986; 6:20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Q, Lin Q, Shi C, Fu X, Li N, Liu L, Wu S. Isolation and identification of a pathogenic Plesiomonas shigelloides from diseased grass carp. Acta Microbiol. 2014; 54:229–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Behera BK, Bera AK, Paria P, Das A, Parida PK, Kumari S, et al.Identification and pathogenicity of Plesiomonas shigelloides in Silver Carp. Aquac. 2018; 493:314–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.04.063.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nisha RG, Rajathi V, Manikandan R, Prabhu NM. Isolation of Plesiomonas shigelloides from infected cichlid fishes using 16S rRNA characterization and its control with probiotic Pseudomonas sp. Acta Sci Veterinariae. 2014; 42(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Urawa S, Awakura T. Protozoan diseases of freshwater fishes in Hokkaido. Sci Rep Hokkaido Fish Hatch. 1994; 48:47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Urawa S, Kusakari M. The survivability of the ectoparasitic flagellate Ichthyobodo necator on chum salmon fry (Oncorhynchus keta) in seawater and comparison to Ichthyobodo sp. on Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). J Parasitol. 1990; 76:33–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3282624.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Todal JA, Karlsbakk E, Isaksen TE, Plarre H, Urawa S, Mouton A, et al.Ichthyobodo necator (Kinetoplastida) a complex of sibling species. Dis Aquat Org. 2004; 58(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao058009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Callahan HA, Litaker RW, Noga EJ. Genetic relationships among members of the Ichthyobodo necator complex: implications for the management of aquaculture stocks. J Fish Dis. 2005; 28(2):111–8. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00603.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Balta F, Balta ZD, Akhan S. Seasonal distribution of protozoan parasite infections in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in the Eastern Black Sea of Turkey. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol. 2019; 39:31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jensen HM, Karami AM, Mathiessen H, Al-Jubury A, Kania PW, Buchmann K. Gill amoebae from freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): In vitro evaluation of antiparasitic compounds against Vannella sp. J Fish Dis. 2020; 43(6):665–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13162.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Isaksen TE, Karlsbakk E, Sundnes GA, Nylund A. Patterns of Ichthyobodo necator sensu stricto infections on hatchery reared salmon (Salmo salar L.) in Norway. Dis Aquat Org. 2010; 88:207–14. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02173.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Whitman KA. Finfish and shellfish bacteriology manual: techniques and procedures. USA: Iowa state press: 2004.

  36. Soler L, Yanez MA, Chacon MR, Aguilera AMG, Catalán V, Figueras MJ, et al.Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Aeromonas based on two housekeeping genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54:1511–9. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03048-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M, UGENE team. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. J Bioinform. 2012; 28:1166–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 35:1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4:406–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evol. 1985; 39:783–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16:111–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious Bacteria; approved guideline-second edition CLSI document M45-A2. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 31st ed. CLSI supplement M100. USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Urawa S, Ueki N, Karlsbakk E. A review of Ichthyobodo infection in marine fishes. Fish Pathol. 1998; 33(4):311–20. https://doi.org/10.3147/jsfp.33.311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Busch S, Dalsgaard I, Buchmann K. Concomitant exposure of rainbow trout fry to Gyrodactylus derjavini and Flavobacterium psychrophilum: effects on infection and mortality of host. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 117(1-2):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.07.018.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bandilla M, Valtonen ET, Suomalainen LR, Aphalo PJ, Hakalahti T. A link between ectoparasite infection and susceptibility to bacterial disease in rainbow trout. Int J Parasitol. 2006; 36(9):987–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.05.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Arriagada G, Hamilton WC, Nekouei O, Foerster C, Müller A, Lara M, et al.Caligus rogercresseyi infestation is associated with Piscirickettsia salmonis-attributed mortalities in farmed salmonids in Chile. Prev Vet Med. 2019;171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104771.

  48. Xu DH, Shoemaker CA, Klesius PH. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis as a potential vector of Edwardsiella ictaluri in channel catfish. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012; 329(2):160–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02518.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Novak CW, Lewis DL, Collicutt B, Verkaik K, Barker DE. Investigations on the role of the salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Caligidae), as a vector in the transmission of Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. J Fish Dis. 2016; 39(10):1165–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12449.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hadfield KA, Smit NJ. Parasitic Crustacea as Vectors In: Smit N, Bruce N, Hadfield K, editors. Parasitic Crustacea. Zoological Monographs. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17385-2_7.

  51. Fečkaninová A, Koščová J, Mudroňová D, Popelka P, Toropilova J. The use of probiotic bacteria against Aeromonas infections in salmonid aquaculture. Aquac. 2017; 469:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.11.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ma J, Bruce TJ, Oliver LP, Cain KD. Co-infection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and Flavobacterium psychrophilum. J Fish Dis. 2019; 42(7):1065–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Abdel-Latif HM, Dawood MA, Menanteau-Ledouble S, El-Matbouli M. The nature and consequences of co-infections in tilapia: A review. J Fish Dis. 2020; 43(6):651–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13164.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Loch TP, Scribner K, Tempelman R, Whelan G, Faisal M. Bacterial infections of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum), returning to gamete collecting weirs in Michigan. J Fish Dis. 2012; 35(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01322.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Delphino MKVC, Leal CAG, Gardner IA, Assis GBN, Roriz GD, Ferreira F, et al.Seasonal dynamics of bacterial pathogens of Nile tilapia farmed in a Brazilian reservoir. Aquac. 2019; 498:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Theodoropoulos C, Wong TH, O’Brien M, Stenzel D. Plesiomonas shigelloides enters polarized human intestinal Caco-2 cells in an in vitro model system. Infect Immun. 2001; 69(4):2260–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.4.2260-2269.2001.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bhunia AK. Opportunistic and Emerging Foodborne Pathogens: Aeromonas hydrophila, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Cronobacter sakazakii, and Brucella abortus. In: Foodborne Microbial Pathogens. New York: Springer: 2018. p. 343–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Borella L, Salogni C, Vitale N, Scali F, Moretti VM, Pasquali P, et al.Motile aeromonads from farmed and wild freshwater fish in northern Italy: an evaluation of antimicrobial activity and multidrug resistance during 2013 and 2016. Acta Vet Scand. 2020; 62(1):1–8. https://10.1186/s13028-020-0504-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. González MJ, Villanueva MP, Latif F, Fernández F, Fernández H. Aislamiento de Plesiomonas shigelloides y Aeromonas veronii biotipo sobria en heces de lobo marino común sudamericano, Otaria flavescens (Shaw,1800). Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr. 2009; 44(3):763–5. doi:10.4067/S0718-19572009000300021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pu W, Guo G, Yang N, Li Q, Yin F, Wang P, et al.Three species of Aeromonas (A. dhakensis, A. hydrophila and A. jandaei) isolated from freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus siamensis) with pneumonia and septicemia. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019; 68(3):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13112.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Salighehzadeh R, Sharifiyazdi H, Akhlaghi M, Khalafian M, Gholamhosseini A, Soltanian S. Molecular and clinical evidence of Aeromonas hydrophila and Fusarium solani co-infection in narrow-clawed crayfish Astacus leptodactylus. Dis Aquat Org. 2019; 132:135–41. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03309.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Grilo ML, Sousa SC, Robalo J, Oliveira M. The potential of Aeromonas spp. from wildlife as antimicrobial resistance indicators in aquatic environments. Ecol Indic. 2020;115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106396.

  63. Igbinosa IH, Igumbor EU, Aghdasi F, Tom M, Okoh AI. Emerging Aeromonas species infections and their significance in public health. Sci World J. 2012;625023. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/625023.

  64. Dodd CER. Infrequent Microbial Infections. Foodborne Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385007-2.00013-9.

  65. Djuikom E, Njiné T, Nola M, Kemka N, Togouet SZ, Jugnia LB. Significance and suitability of Aeromonas hydrophila vs. fecal coliforms in assessing microbiological water quality. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 24(11):2665–70. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9793-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Igbinosa IH, Beshiru A, Odjadjare EE, Ateba CN, Igbinosa EO. Pathogenic potentials of Aeromonas species isolated from aquaculture and abattoir environments. Microb Pathog. 2017; 107:185–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.037.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nwokocha ARC, Onyemelukwe NF. Plesiomonas shigelloides diarrhea in Enugu area of the southeastern Nigeria: incidence, clinical and epidemiological features. J Dent Sci. 2014; 13:68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chen X, Chen Y, Yang Q, Kong H, Yu F, Han D, et al.Plesiomonas shigelloides infection in Southeast China. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Jacobs L, Chenia HY. Characterization of integrons and tetracycline resistance determinants in Aeromonas spp. isolated from South African aquaculture systems. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 114(3):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.030.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu CJ, Ko WC, Lee NY, Su SL, Li CW, Li MC, et al.Aeromonas isolates from fish and patients in Tainan City, Taiwan: genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019; 85(21):e01360-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01360-19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Piotrowska M, Przygodzińska D, Matyjewicz K, Popowska M. Occurrence and variety of β-lactamase genes among Aeromonas spp. isolated from urban wastewater treatment plant. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00863.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vega SV, Latif EF, Soriano VE, Beaz HR, Figueras MJ, Aguilera AMG, et al.Re-identification of Aeromonas isolates from rainbow trout and incidence of class 1 integron and β-lactamase genes. Vet Microbiol. 2014; 172(3-4):528–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.06.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Sah SK, Hemalatha S. Extended spectrum Beta lactamase (ESBL) Mechanism of antibiotic resistance and Epidemiology. Int J Pharmtech Res. 2015; 7(2):303–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Abgottspon H, Nüesch-Inderbinen MT, Zurfluh K, Althaus D, Hächler H, Stephan R. Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum-and pAmpC-type β-lactamase-encoding genes isolated from freshwater fish from two lakes in Switzerland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58(4):2482–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02689-13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Marathe NP, Gaikwad SS, Vaishampayan AA, Rasane MH, Shouche YS, Gade WN. Mossambicus tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) collected from water bodies impacted by urban waste carries extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and integron-bearing gut bacteria. J Biosci. 2016; 41(3):341–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-016-9620-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ekundayo TC, Okoh AI. Antimicrobial resistance in freshwater Plesiomonas shigelloides isolates: Implications for environmental pollution and risk assessment. Environ Pollut. 2019;257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113493.

  77. Wiegand I, Burak S. Effect of inoculum density on susceptibility of Plesiomonas shigelloides to cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004; 54(2):418–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh322.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Stock I, Wiedemann B. Natural antimicrobial susceptibilities of Plesiomonas shigelloides strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 48(6):803–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.6.803.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Martins AFM, Pinheiro TL, Imperatori A, Freire SM, Sá-Freire L, Moreira BM, et al.Plesiomonas shigelloides: A notable carrier of acquired antimicrobial resistance in small aquaculture farms. Aquaculture. 2019; 500:514–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.10.040.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Aravena RM, Inglis TJJ, Henderson V, Riley TV, Chang BJ. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Aeromonas strains isolated from clinical and environmental sources to 26 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(2):1110–2. http://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05387-11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kolda A, Mujakić I, Perić L, Smrzlić IV, Kapetanović D. Microbiological Quality Assessment of Water and Fish from Karst Rivers of the Southeast Black Sea Basin (Croatia), and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Aeromonas Isolates. Curr Microbiol. 2020; 77:2322–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02081-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Baron S, Granier SA, Larvor E, Jouy E, Cineux M, Wilhelm A, et al.Aeromonas diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility in freshwater – an attempt to set generic epidemiological cut-off values. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00503.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Pazda M, Kumirska J, Stepnowski P, Mulkiewicz E. Antibiotic resistance genes identified in wastewater treatment plant systems–A review. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 697:134023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134023.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Limbu SM. Antibiotics Use in African Aquaculture: Their Potential Risks on Fish and Human Health In: Abia A, Lanza G, editors. Current Microbiological Research in Africa. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35296-7_8.

  85. Preena PG, Swaminathan TR, Kumar VJR, Singh ISB. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: a crisis for concern. Biol. 2020; 75:1497–517. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00456-4.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zdanowicz M, Mudryk ZJ, Perliński P. Abundance and antibiotic resistance of Aeromonas isolated from the water of three carp ponds. Vet Res Commun. 2020; 44:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-020-09768-x.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Aguilar ZG, Ruiz LA, Betancourt LM. Presencia de compuestos organoclorados persistentes (COPS) en poblaciones de trucha dorada Mexicana (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster), especie endémica de la Sierra Madre Occidental In: Ruiz LA, García-De León FJ, editors. La trucha dorada mexicana. México: CIAD-CIBNOR: 2016. p. 115–24.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ruiz LA, García DLJF. Estado actual y perspectivas en la investigación de la trucha dorada mexicana, un recurso poco conocid In: Ruiz LA, García De León FJ, editors. La trucha dorada mexicana. México: CIAD-CIBNOR: 2016. p. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Martino ME, Fasolato L, Montemurro F, Rosteghin M, Manfrin A, Patarnello T, et al.Determination of microbial diversity of Aeromonas strains on the basis of multilocus sequence typing, genotype and presence of putative virulence genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77:4986–5000. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00708-11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Hanninen ML, Hirvela KV. Genetic diversity of atypical Aeromonas salmonicida studied by pulse field gel electrophoresis. Epidemiol Infect. 1999; 123:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268899002903.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Levin RE. Rapid Detection and Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens by Molecular Techniques, 1st ed: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420092431.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank Carlos Antonio Ochoa Macedo and Jorge Andrés Suárez Ramírez for their contribution with microbiological characterization of isolates and María Eréndira Árciga Delgado and Mariana Dafne Moreno Basurto for their contribution for analysis and description of internal lesions and photography.

Funding

The project was partially funded by a project from Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Inocuidad y Calidad Alimentaria (SENASICA) to the Comité Estatal de Sanidad Acuícola de Michoacán (CESAMICH) to JJVA for an epidemiological survey of Aeromonas spp. in rainbow trout in Michoacán including study design, sample collection and microbiological analysis of the isolates. Partial funding from a project from the Laboratorio Nacional de Nutrigenómica Digestiva Animal to CAMP and a project from Coordinación de la Investigación Científica-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (CIC-UMSNH) to JJVA for molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance profiles of Aeromonas spp. isolates in rainbow trout; and from PLT Lab S.A.P.I. de C.V. in agreement with JJVA to implement molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of bacterial isolates.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAFV, CAMP, JLCA, and JJVA contributed with experimental design and to reach funding for the project; MAFV, EBT, GIM and AAT contributed with sample collection and case documentation and description; MAFV, JLOE and EBT contributed to microbial and ectoparasite isolation and identification; MAFV, JLOE, VMBA, ABP and MCJ contributed to molecular identification and data analysis and discussion; MAFV, CAMP, JLCA, and JJVA drafted the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan José Valdez Alarcón.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent of participation is not applicable to this study.

Consent for publication

The administrator of the farm in this case report gave written consent to publish the case in public.

Competing interests

JJVA has an agreement with PLT Lab S.A.P.I. de C.V. for the future development of molecular diagnosis and control solutions for animal, plant and human infectious diseases. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuentes-Valencia, M.A., Osornio-Esquivel, J.L., Martínez Palacios, C.A. et al. Bacterial and parasite co-infection in Mexican golden trout (Oncorhynchus chrysogaster) by Aeromonas bestiarum, Aeromonas sobria, Plesiomonas shigelloides and Ichthyobodo necator. BMC Vet Res 18, 137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03208-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03208-5

Keywords

  • Salmonids
  • Oncorhynchus chrysogaster
  • Bacterial coinfection
  • Antimicrobial resistance