Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of zoonotic platyhelminthe infections identified in slaughtered livestock in Iran, 2015–2019

BMC Veterinary Research volume 17, Article number: 185 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Platyhelminth infections of livestock can result in considerable economic losses. This study aims to evaluate the spatial frequency of cystic echinococcosis (CE), dicrocoeliasis, and fascioliasis in livestock slaughtered in Iran during the years 2015–2019 and estimate direct costs associated with organ condemnation due to these parasites.

Methods

Abattoir data from 413 abattoirs representing all 31 Iranian provinces were collected from the Iran Veterinary Organization. Infection prevalence was calculated per year at the province level. The Local Moran’s I statistic was performed to evaluate spatial autocorrelation of animals positive at slaughter for the years 2015–2019. Direct costs associated with condemned livers were calculated for each parasitic condition, with costs associated with condemned lungs also included for CE.

Results

Overall prevalence values for the study timeframe were as follows: sheep and goat fascioliasis 1.56% (95% CI: 1.56–1.56%), cattle fascioliasis 3.86% (95% CI: 3.85–3.88%), sheep and goat dicrocoeliasis 4.63% (95% CI: 4.62–4.63%), cattle dicrocoeliasis 3.08% (95% CI: 3.07–3.09%), sheep and goat CE 5.32% (95% CI: 5.32–5.33%), and cattle CE 7.26% (95% CI: 7.24–7.28%). Northwest Iran had the highest prevalence of CE and fascioliasis. High infection areas for Dicrocoelium spp. included the provinces of Zanjan, Gilan, Qazvin, and Tehran, which are located in northern Iran. Direct economic losses for sheep and goat fascioliasis, dicrocoeliasis, and CE for the study period were US$13,842,759, US$41,771,377, and US$22,801,054, respectively. Direct economic losses for cattle fascioliasis, dicrocoeliasis, and CE for the study period were US$1,989,200, US$1,668,986, and US$2,656,568, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings provide valuable data for future monitoring of these important parasitic diseases in Iranian livestock. Disease control strategies are required to reduce the economic and public health impact of these platyhelminths.

Background

Livestock products provide an important source of protein for people worldwide [1]. Helminth infections are common in livestock and can result in economic losses to the livestock industry [2, 3]. Parasite infections can lead to decreased growth, weight, and fertility, which can impact the production and/or quality of meat, milk, and hide/wool [4, 5]. For example, financial losses due to fascioliasis in livestock are estimated to total US$ 3 billion per year globally [6].

Fascioliasis and dicrocoeliasis are two of the most common zoonotic helminth diseases of domestic livestock and both are included on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) list of important human foodborne infections [7, 8]. These trematodes are found in the gallbladder and bile ducts of ruminants such as sheep, cattle, and goats [9]. Humans can also become infected via inadvertent ingestion of metacercariae on aquatic plants (Fasciola spp.) or in ants (Dicrocoelium spp.) [10, 11]. A systematic review estimated a fascioliasis pooled prevalence of 6.2% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.8–6.5%) in Iranian livestock, with prevalence values of 3.1% (95% CI: 2.4–3.7%) in goats, 4.2% (95% CI: 3.8–4.5%) in sheep, and 9.0% (95% CI: 8.0–9.9%) in cattle [12]. In northern Iran, a large outbreak of human fascioliasis occurred in 1989, infecting approximately 10,000 individuals in Gilan Province. In 1999, another outbreak occurred in the same region, infecting approximately 5000 people. Also, in 2000, there were a reported 1306 cases of human fascioliasis in the province of Gilan [13].

Dicrocoeliasis is known to be quite common in Iranian livestock. Between 2015 and 2018, 2.9% of 571,991 slaughtered sheep and goats and 0.8% of 80,001 slaughtered cattle were positive for Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Tehran Province [14]. Human dicrocoeliasis occurs sporadically in Iran, with only five cases reported in the literature [15].

Cystic echinococcosis (CE), due to infection with the larval form of Echinocococcus granulosus sensu lato, is a globally important disease caused by zoonotic cestodes that cycle between canid definitive hosts and a variety of livestock intermediate hosts. Humans can act as aberrant intermediate hosts through ingestion of parasite eggs found on infected dogs, contaminated vegetables, or in water [16]. Hydatid cysts can be observed in various parts of the body, but are most commonly found in the liver and lungs [17]. CE is considered an endemic disease in Iran, especially in rural communities [18]. Between 1995 and 2014, 8518 cases of human CE were recorded in different provinces of Iran, with the largest number of cases from Razavi Khorasan Province. The average annual number of human cases was 277 for this time period [19]. Between 1990 and 2015, a study found that 5.9% of sheep, 8.8% of cattle, and 6.4% of goats in Iran had CE at the time of slaughter [20]. An additional study conducted in Tehran Province, found that 2.5% of 571,991 slaughtered sheep and 2.2% of 80,001 slaughtered cattle had CE between February 1, 2015, and January 31, 2018 [14]. The objective of the current study was to determine the province-level prevalence, spatial distribution, and direct economic impact of livestock infections with Fasciola spp., Dicrocoelium spp., and E. granulosuss s.l. in Iran for the years 2015–2019.

Methods

Data collection and infection prevalence

Sheep are the most common livestock in Iran, followed by goats, and cattle. In April 2020, there were approximately 4,900,000 cattle, 47,300,000 sheep, and 17,000,000 goats in Iran (https://www.amar.org.ir), with the highest livestock populations in the northwestern part of the country (Fig. 1) [21]. This retrospective study was conducted by using data from the Iran Veterinary Organization, which is a central repository for all abattoir-based data. In the current study, data from 2015 to 2019 were assessed from 413 abattoirs representing all 31 Iranian provinces. The data included total number of slaughtered cattle, sheep, and goats by abattoir location as well as fascioliasis, dicrocoeliasis, and CE infection status. Since these three parasites are visible by the naked eye on postmortem inspection, detection was carried out by official veterinary meat inspectors working at the various abattoirs. There have been no studies conducted in Iran to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the meat inspection process to detect platyhelminthes. However, a study conducted in Switzerland reported a sensitivity of 63.2% (95% credible interval: 55.6–70.6%) and a specificity nearing 100% to detect liver flukes in cattle using visual meat inspection [22]. A study conducted in Australia found a sensitivity of 24.9% (95% CI: 18.9–32.3%) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.6–99.6%) to detect CE in cattle using standard visual meat inspection practices [23]. Infection prevalence was obtained by evaluating the number of positive animals divided by the number of animals slaughtered per year (Additional File 1). Confidence intervals were calculated by Wilson method.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Average number of livestock (cattle, sheep, and goats) per year in 31 Iranian provinces, 2015–2019 (https://www.amar.org.ir)

Full size image

Spatial analyses

Descriptive maps of the prevalence of animals infected with Dicrocoelium spp., Fasciola spp., and E. granulosus s.l. were created for the years 2015–2019 using natural break classification, with five classes. Natural break classification is a data grouping method designed to determine the best arrangement of values into different classes. This is conducted by seeking to minimize each class’s average deviation from the class mean, while maximizing each class’s deviation from the means of the other groups. In other words, the method seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes [24].

The Local Moran’s I statistic was performed to quantify spatial autocorrelation of prevalence at the provincial level. The number of 499 permutations was used during analysis. This test calculates a z-score and p-value to determine whether the apparent similarity (a spatial clustering of either high or low values) or dissimilarity (a spatial outlier) is more pronounced than one would expect in a random distribution. The null hypothesis states that prevalence values are randomly distributed across the study area. High-high and low-low regions indicate that the target area is encompassed by regions with similar prevalence values, while high-low and low-high regions show that the target area is encompassed by regions with dissimilar prevalence values. In other words, the high-high and low-low areas indicate clusters of prevalence at a certain level [25]. ArcGIS 10.5 was used for space-time analyses.

Economic impact

Direct costs associated with offal condemnation due to fascioliasis (liver), dicrocoeliasis (liver), and CE (liver and/or lungs) were estimated. An animal with CE cysts in both the liver and lungs would contribute both organs to the economic estimate, but would only be considered once for evaluation of CE prevalence. The average price of liver and lungs (cattle liver = US$8.20, sheep/goat liver = US$15.24, cattle lung = US$1.76, and sheep/goat lung = US$0.70) were acquired from the Meisam abattoir in Tehran for the years 2015–2019, with the assumption that there is little variation in price countrywide. The prices of livers and lungs were then multiplied by the number of condemned organs per year (Additional file 2). Costs were converted from the Iranian rial to the US$ for each study year using the free exchange rate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_rial).

Results

Parasite infection prevalence

In total, 3.86% (95% CI: 3.85–3.88%) of slaughtered cattle and 1.56% (95% CI: 1.56–1.56%) of slaughtered sheep and goats where infected with Fasciola spp. from 2015 to 2019. Annual prevalence of cattle fascioliasis ranged from 3.2% in 2019 to 3.9% in 2015, while the annual prevalence of sheep and goat fascioliasis ranged from 1.2% in 2015 to 1.6% in 2019 (Fig. 2). The highest number of cases of fascioliasis where in the provinces of Ardabil and East Azerbaijan, which are located in northwestern Iran (Additional File 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Annual prevalence of fascioliasis, dicrocoeliasis, and CE in livestock slaughtered in 31 Iranian provinces, 2015–2019

Full size image

In total, 3.08% (95% CI: 3.07–3.09%) of slaughtered cattle and 4.63% (95% CI: 4.62–4.63%) of slaughtered sheep and goats where infected with Dicrocoelium spp. from 2015 to 2019. Annual prevalence of cattle dicrocoeliasis ranged from 2.7% in 2019 to 3.0% in 2015, while the annual prevalence of dicrocoeliasis in sheep and goats ranged from 3.7% in 2015 to 4.8% in 2019 (Fig. 2). The majority of cases of dicrocoeliasis were found in northern Iran (Additional File 4).

In total, 7.26% (95% CI: 7.24–7.28%) of slaughtered cattle and 5.32% (95% CI: 5.32–5.33%) of slaughtered sheep and goats where infected with E. granulosus s.l. from 2015 to 2019. Annual prevalence of cattle CE ranged from 5.9% in 2015 to 9.2% in 2019, while the annual prevalence in sheep and goats ranged from 4.0% in 2015 to 6.1% in 2019 (Fig. 2). The majority of CE cases were found in northern Iran (Additional File 5).

Spatial analysis

The provinces of East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan, and Ardabil, which are all located in northwestern Iran, exhibited high-high cluster patterns for cattle fascioliasis. East Azerbaijan was also identified as a high-risk area for sheep and goat fascioliasis (Fig. 3). Dicrocoeliasis was most common in the northern provinces of Zanjan, Gilan, Qazvin, and Tehran (Fig. 4). The northern provinces of Isfahan, Chaharmahal, and Bakhtiari exhibited high-high cluster patterns for cattle CE, while sheep and goat CE was common in northwestern Iran (Fig. 5). The local Moran’s index values and P-values for the maps presented in Figs. 3, 4 and 5 are shown in Additional File 6.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cluster analysis of fascioliasis in cattle (left panels) and in sheep and goats (right panels) in 31 Iranian provinces, 2015–2019

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Cluster analysis of dicrocoeliasis in cattle (left panels) and in sheep and goats (right panels) in 31 Iranian provinces, 2015–2019

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Cluster analysis of CE in cattle (left panels) and in sheep and goats (right panels) in 31 Iranian provinces, 2015–2019

Full size image

Economic impact

A total of 233,175 cattle livers and 910,282 sheep and goat livers were discarded due to fascioliasis during 2015–2019. These losses resulted in direct cost estimates of US$ 1,989,200 for cattle and US$ 13,842,759 for sheep and goats. During this same time period, 186,009 cattle livers and 2,701,274 sheep and goat livers where condemned due to dicrocoeliasis, resulting in losses of US$ 1,668,986 and US$ 41,771,377, respectively. In addition, 311,982 cattle livers and 1,500,385 sheep and goat livers were discarded due to CE, resulting in losses of US$2,422,035 and US$21,639,272, respectively. Furthermore, 126,602 cattle lungs and 1,608,382 sheep and goat lungs were discarded due to CE, resulting in losses of US$234,532 and US$1,161,781, respectively. These condemnations resulted in an estimated direct loss of US$84,729,943 due to the three parasitic infections over the five-year period (Additional File 7).

Discussion

This is the first spatial analysis of fascioliasis, dicrocoeliasis, and CE prevalence in slaughtered livestock for the entire country of Iran. Slaughtered cattle and small ruminants were more commonly infected with CE compared to the other evaluated parasites during the study timeframe. CE is endemic in the Middle East, with a recent systematic review calculating a weighted prevalence of 15.6% (95% CI = 14.2–17.1%) in livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, buffalos, camels, donkeys, and boars) and 4.2% (95% CI = 3.0–5.5%) in humans from Iran [20]. The mean annual prevalence values for CE in cattle (5.3%) and sheep and goats (7.3%) reported in the current study align with findings from Khalkhali et al. (2018) who reported a prevalence of 8.8% in cattle, 5.9% in sheep, and 6.4% in goats in Iran [20]. We identified high CE prevalence values in the northwestern region of the country, with much lower values in southern Iran. These distributions align with reported high prevalence values for human CE in northern (9, 95% CI: 4–18%) and western (6, 95% CI: 3–11%) Iran [26].

Porous international borders make it difficult to control illegal importation of livestock infected with CE, especially when neighboring countries continue to have problems with the parasite. CE prevalence in cattle and small ruminants was found to be 8.0 and 8.9%, respectively, in Pakistan [27]. In Iraq, 30% of cattle and 32% of small ruminants were found to be infected with CE [28]. Very limited information is currently available from Afghanistan and Turkmenistan. However, they are both also believed to be endemic for E. granulosus s.l. [29].

Dicrocoeliasis was the second most prevalent parasite found in this study, which aligns with other abattoir-based surveys conducted in Iran [30, 31]. It is believed that Dicrocoelium spp. eggs can survive for a longer time on pastures compared to the eggs of Fasciola spp. Based on the data presented here, high infection areas for Dicrocoelium spp. were identified in northern Iran. A study focused on predicting the spatial distribution and environmental suitability for Dicrocoelium spp. identified the littoral of the Caspian Sea as a high-risk area, with regional prevalence values of 36.7 and 6.1% for sheep and cattle, respectively [32]. A temperature range of 10–25 °C and high levels of moisture are needed for the development of both Fasciola larvae and its intermediate snail host (Lymnaea truncatula) [33]. Over the past decade, Iran has experienced a prolonged and severe drought [34]. At present, the northern, northwestern, and western regions of Iran appear to be most suitable for completion of the Fasciola spp. life cycle [12, 35, 36]. Spatial analysis confirmed that northwest Iran was a high prevalence region for fascioliasis. Use of spatial analysis is helpful to highlight regions of concern and to help plan control initiatives.

CE (liver and/or lung infection) was the most prevalent evaluated parasitic infection in slaughtered Iranian livestock, but economic losses were greatest for dicrocoeliasis since the price of liver is approximately 12 times the price of lung. Although few economic assessments have been performed to evaluate costs due to dicrocoeliasis, D. dendriticum was responsible for 26% of marketable organ condemnation due to parasite infection in the region of Trikala, Greece. However, since only a small percentage (0.26%) of organs were condemned due to parasitic infections in this region of Greece, the economic impact was negligible [37]. Annual economic losses due to cattle fascioliasis in Iran were estimated to be 28.9 and 9.2 times the losses recorded in Nigeria (US$13,773) and Ethiopia (US$43,024), respectively [38, 39]. Annual economic losses due to cattle CE were estimated to be 9.1 times the losses in Ethiopia (US$ 58,114) and 7.3 times the losses in Australia (US$ 66,893) [40, 41].

The present study did have a number of limitations. First, we were unable to account for mixed infections with more than one parasite. This is because aggregated data received from the Iran Veterinary Organization did not include the number of animals with more than one parasite in a specific data field. Instead, if an animal carried more than one parasite, it was counted in all related data fields (Additional File 1). In other words, this limitation did not affect our maps but it did not allow us to create a hybrid map (e.g. a map containing both Dicrocoelium spp. and Fasciola spp.).

Second, we were not able to analyze sheep and goat data separately since sheep and goat slaughter lines are not differentiated in Iran. In addition, CE cysts located in organs other than the liver and lungs were likely missed. Therefore, prevalence values may be underestimated. An updated reporting structure is needed to be able to better assess parasite frequency and impacted livestock species. Also, only direct costs due to organ condemnation were evaluated. These parasitic conditions likely have additional impacts on animal growth and other production measures, which were not assessed in this study. Overall, the prevalence of these three parasites appears to have either remained steady or increased (e.g., cattle CE) between 2015 and 2019. Since these parasites are potential human health hazards, special attention should be given to their control [42].

Conclusion

This study has shown that platyhelminth infections continue to be prevalent in Iranian livestock and result in substantial economic losses. These values reinforce the necessity of developing effective control programs based on regional needs.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available to the public from the Additional File 1.

Abbreviations

CE:

Cystic echinococcosis

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Grigg D. The pattern of world protein consumption. Geoforum. 1995;26(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(94)00020-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbabi M, Nezami E, Hooshyar H, Delavari M. Epidemiology and economic loss of fasciolosis and dicrocoeliosis in Arak, Iran. Veterinary world. 2018;11(12):1648–55. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1648-1655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlier J, Rinaldi L, Musella V, Ploeger HW, Chartier C, Vineer HR, et al. Initial assessment of the economic burden of major parasitic helminth infections to the ruminant livestock industry in Europe. Prev Vet Med. 2020;182:105103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Umur S, Kaaden OR. Prevalence and economic importance of cystic Echinococcosis in slaughtered ruminants in Burdur, Turkey 1. J Veterinary Med Ser B. 2003;50(5):247–52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00667.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlier J, van der Voort M, Kenyon F, Skuce P, Vercruysse J. Chasing helminths and their economic impact on farmed ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30(7):361–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elliott T, Kelley J, Rawlin G, Spithill T. High prevalence of fasciolosis and evaluation of drug efficacy against Fasciola hepatica in dairy cattle in the Maffra and Bairnsdale districts of Gippsland, Victoria, Australia. Vet Parasitol. 2015;209(1–2):117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Organization WH (2011) Report of the WHO expert consultation on foodborne trematode infections and taeniasis. World Health Organization,

    Google Scholar 

  8. Organization WH. Initiative to estimate the global burden of foodborne diseases. In: First formal meeting of the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group. Geneva; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Youn H. Review of zoonotic parasites in medical and veterinary fields in the Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2009;47(Suppl):S133. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2009.47.S.S133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. SABZEVARINEZHAD G (2004) Flukes Liver Epidemic Common Between Human and Livestock in Slaughtered and Their Staining.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Otranto D, Traversa D. A review of dicrocoeliosis of ruminants including recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment. Vet Parasitol. 2002;107(4):317–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00121-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khademvatan S, Majidiani H, Khalkhali H, Taghipour A, Asadi N, Yousefi E. Prevalence of fasciolosis in livestock and humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis in Iran. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;65:116–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ashrafi K. The status of human and animal fascioliasis in Iran: a narrative review article. Iran J Parasitol. 2015;10(3):306–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pezeshki A, Aminfar H, Aminzare M. An analysis of common foodborne parasitic zoonoses in slaughtered sheep and cattle in Tehran, Iran, during 2015-2018. Veterinary World. 2018;11(10):1486–90. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1486-1490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashrafi K. Human dicrocoeliasis in northern Iran: two case reports from Gilan province. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2010;104(4):351–3. https://doi.org/10.1179/136485910X12647085215813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rokni M. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2009;4(2):1–16.

  17. Jenkins D, Romig T, Thompson R. Emergence/re-emergence of Echinococcus spp.—a global update. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(11–12):1205–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashemnia M, Safavi EAA. A retrospective survey of hydatidosis based on abattoir data in Kermanshah, Iran from 2008 to 2013. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40(2):459–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeinali M, Mohebali M, Shirzadi MR, ESBOEI BR, Erfani H, Pourmozafari J, et al. Human cystic Echinococcosis in different geographical zones of Iran: an observational study during 1995–2014. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(12):1623–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalkhali H, Foroutan M, Khademvatan S, Majidiani H, Aryamand S, Khezri P, et al. Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Helminthol. 2018;92(3):260–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X17000463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amiraslani F, Dragovich D. Combating desertification in Iran over the last 50 years: an overview of changing approaches. J Environ Manag. 2011;92(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rapsch C, Schweizer G, Grimm F, Kohler L, Bauer C, Deplazes P, et al. Estimating the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle slaughtered in Switzerland in the absence of an absolute diagnostic test. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36(10–11):1153–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson CS, Jenkins DJ, Barnes TS, Brookes VJ. Evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of meat inspection for hepatic hydatid disease in beef cattle in an Australian abattoir. Prev Vet Med. 2019;167:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. ESRI Data classification methods. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/layer-properties/data-classification-methods.htm. Accessed 28 November 2020.

  25. Moran P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika. 1950;37(1-2):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khademvatan S, Majidiani H, Foroutan M, Tappeh KH, Aryamand S, Khalkhali H. Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in Iran: a systematic review. J Helminthol. 2019;93(2):131–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X18000275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mehmood N, Arshad M, Ahmed H, Simsek S, Muqaddas H. Comprehensive account on prevalence and characteristics of Hydatid cysts in livestock from Pakistan. Korean J Parasitol. 2020;58(2):121–7. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2020.58.2.121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Alsaady HAM, Al-Quzweeni HAN. Molecular study of Echinococcus Granulosus in Misan Province, south of Iraq. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(9):1062–6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02581.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang W, Zhang Z, Wu W, Shi B, Li J, Zhou X, et al. Epidemiology and control of echinococcosis in Central Asia, with particular reference to the People's Republic of China. Acta Trop. 2015;141:235–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Najjari M, Karimazar M, Rezaeian S, Ebrahimipour M, Faridi A. Prevalence and economic impact of cystic echinococcosis and liver fluke infections in slaughtered sheep and goat in north-Central Iran, 2008–2018. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-019-01156-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Motazedian M, Najjari M, Zarean M, Karimi G, Karimazar M, Ebrahimipour M. An abattoir survey of hydatid and liver fluke disease in slaughtered cattle in Alborz Province, Iran. Comp Clin Pathol. 2019;28(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2800-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meshgi B, Majidi-Rad M, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Kazemzadeh A. Predicting environmental suitability and geographical distribution of Dicrocoelium dendriticum at littoral of Caspian Sea: an ecological niche-based modeling. Prev Vet Med. 2019;170:104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fox NJ, White PC, McClean CJ, Marion G, Evans A, Hutchings MR. Predicting impacts of climate change on Fasciola hepatica risk. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Emadodin I, Reinsch T, Taube F. Drought and desertification in Iran. Hydrology. 2019;6(3):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology6030066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khanjari A, Bahonar A, Fallah S, Bagheri M, Alizadeh A, Fallah M, et al. Prevalence of fasciolosis and dicrocoeliosis in slaughtered sheep and goats in Amol abattoir, Mazandaran, northern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4(2):120–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60327-3.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ezatpour B, Hasanvand A, Azami M, Mahmoudvand H, Anbari K. A slaughterhouse study on prevalence of some helminths of cattle in Lorestan provience, West Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4(5):416–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60599-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Theodoropoulos G, Theodoropoulou E, Petrakos G, Kantzoura V, Kostopoulos J. Abattoir condemnation due to parasitic infections and its economic implications in the region of Trikala, Greece. J Veterinary Med Ser B. 2002;49(6):281–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00563.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ola-Fadunsin SD, Uwabujo PI, Halleed IN, Richards B. Prevalence and financial loss estimation of parasitic diseases detected in slaughtered cattle in Kwara state, north-Central Nigeria. J Parasit Dis. 2020;44(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-019-01154-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zewde A, Bayu Y, Wondimu A. Prevalence of bovine Fasciolosis and its economic loss due to liver condemnation at Wolaita Sodo municipal Abattair, Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International 2019; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Guduro GG, Desta AH. Cyst viability and economic significance of Hydatidosis in southern Ethiopia. J Parasitol Res. 2019;2019:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2038628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson CS, Jenkins DJ, Brookes VJ, Barnes TS, Budke CM. Assessment of the direct economic losses associated with hydatid disease (Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto) in beef cattle slaughtered at an Australian abattoir. Prev Vet Med. 2020;176:104900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ekong PS, Juryit R, Dika NM, Nguku P, Musenero M. Prevalence and risk factors for zoonotic helminth infection among humans and animals-Jos, Nigeria, 2005-2009. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12(1). https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2012.12.6.1110.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Iranian Veterinary Organization for assistance obtaining the data presented in this study.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 971327).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Behzad Kiani, Soheil Hashtarkhani & Fatemeh Kiani

  2. Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Christine M. Budke

  3. Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Science, Sabzevar Azad University, Sabzevar, Iran

    Ebrahim Shams Abadi

  4. Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Amene Raouf Rahmati, Mehdi Zarean, Bibi Razieh Hosseini Farash & Elham Moghaddas

  5. Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran

    Mostafa AkbarPour

Authors
  1. Behzad Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine M. Budke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ebrahim Shams Abadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Soheil Hashtarkhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amene Raouf Rahmati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mostafa AkbarPour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mehdi Zarean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bibi Razieh Hosseini Farash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fatemeh Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Elham Moghaddas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design, analysis and interpretation of data: B. K, E.M, S. H and C.B; drafting of the manuscript: E. M, B.K and C.B; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: C. B, B.K and E.M; statistical analysis: B. K and S. H and F.K; Data gathering and cleaning: E.SA, A.RR, M. A, M. Z, F. K and BR.HF. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Moghaddas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Research Department of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (protocol number: IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC.1398.130).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiani, B., Budke, C.M., Shams Abadi, E. et al. Evaluation of zoonotic platyhelminthe infections identified in slaughtered livestock in Iran, 2015–2019. BMC Vet Res 17, 185 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02888-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02888-9

Keywords

  • Echinococcosis
  • Dicrocoeliasis
  • Fascioliasis
  • Livestock
  • Spatial analysis
  • Geographical information systems

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us