Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Five novel PRNP gene polymorphisms and their potential effect on Scrapie susceptibility in three native Ethiopian sheep breeds

BMC Veterinary Research volume 16, Article number: 122 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Classical scrapie susceptibility in sheep has been linked to three polymorphisms at codon 136, 154, and 171 in the prion protein gene (PRNP) whereas atypical scrapie susceptibility is related to polymorphisms at codon 141. Many other variants over the length of the PRNP have been reported. Some of the variants may play crucial roles in fighting against the emergence of a new form of scrapie disease. Scrapie surveillance, scrapie associated genotyping and PRNP characterization studies have been conducted across the globe. However, such in-depth studies have never addressed the African continent’s sheep breeds. Therefore, genotyping native Ethiopian sheep breed’s PRNP gene has socioeconomic and scientific merits. This study aimed to identify PRNP variants in three native Ethiopian sheep breeds and their potential effect on scrapie susceptibility.

Results

Five novel variants were identified in the PRNP gene of three native Ethiopian sheep breeds. Four non-synonymous heterozygous substitutions i.e. H99Q (CAC-- > CAA), H99L (CAC-- > CTA), A116E (GCA-- > GAA), A116T (GCA-- > ACA), and one synonymous N103 N (AAC-- > AAT) were detected. In addition to the novel variants, polymorphisms at codon 126,127,138,142,146,231, and 237 were also identified. The haplotype ARR was observed in Menz and Afar breeds at frequencies of 0.02 and 0.05 respectively. Neither ARR/ARR nor VRQ/VRQ genotypes were identified in the population under study.

Conclusion

Two of the novel variants at codon 99 and 103 that are placed closer to the proteinase K cleavage site and the variant at codon 116 in the palindrome region along with variants at codon 127 in glycine repeat domain may influence the conformational flexibility of prion protein. The rarity of ARR haplotype and the abundance of 141 L variant demonstrated that the present study population was less resistant to classical scrapie and less predisposed to genotype associated atypical scrapie. This study provides a valuable dataset that can be potentially integrated into selective breeding strategies during interbreeding, crossbreeding and help to take precautionary measures against scrapie.

Background

Prion diseases are a collective name for infectious neurodegenerative diseases caused by the misfolding of prion protein [1] .The infectious form of prion protein (PrPSc) has different structural dynamics than cellular prion (PrPC). Specific motifs of prion protein were identified in relation to the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc [2]. Amino acids at codons 141 and 154 were reported to be correlated to different forms of scrapie through altering the conformational flexibility of the prion protein [3].Hence; variants of such kind may play a crucial role in fighting against the emergence of a new form of scrapie.

Though the exact underlined disease mechanism is not yet known, scrapie transmission and susceptibility have been linked to the host genetics. Previous studies identified three polymorphic codons (136A/V, 154R/H, and171Q/R/H) in sheep PRNP (prion protein gene) that are related to scrapie resistance/susceptibility status [4,5,6,7]. Based on National Scrapie Plan for Great Britain, there are 15 known genotypes and 5 types/ groups that are associated to resistance or susceptibility to scrapie. Accordingly, ARR/ARR is the most resistant genotype that is classified under type/group 1, ARR/XXX except VRQ is categorized under type 2, the combination of ARQ, AHQ and ARH alleles have little resistance to scrapie and classified under group 3, ARR/VRQ is genetically susceptible genotype that is classified under type 4 and VRQ/XXX except ARR is classified under highly susceptible group [8]. In atypical scrapie case, susceptibility is higher in individuals with AHQ, AHQ/ARQ and ARR genotypes along with homozygosity for phenylalanine at codon 141 [9]. An earlier study linked AC151RQ genotype to prolonged incubation period after scrapie exposure [7]. Similarly, several studies reported variants such as G126A, G126G, G127G, G127V, G127A, and S138S [10,11,12] in sheep prion protein with or without direct effect to scrapie susceptibility.

In the past several years there were efforts to genetically characterize local breeds of many countries in identifying new variants and determining scrapie resistance/susceptible haplotypes. Based on the findings, measures were taken to control and reduce transmission of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy horizontally and vertically [13,14,15]. However, such type of extensive studies have never been conducted in Sub-Saharan African countries, such as Ethiopia, where livestock is the main economic source and a large proportion of the population depends on livestock products. On the other hand, the ever-increasing animal product demand enhances crossbreeding programs for the last few decades through the importation of exotic animals and the distribution of crossbred F1 in different parts of Ethiopia. Such practices are the potential factors in changing the genetic structure of the population and may introduce new disease susceptible genotypes [16, 17]. Hence, genotyping native Ethiopian sheep breeds PRNP gene has public health, economic and scientific merits [18]. This study aimed to identify PRNP variants in three native Ethiopian sheep breeds and their potential effect on scrapie susceptibility.

Results

In the present study, five novel PRNP variants were detected in the three native Ethiopian sheep breeds. Heterozygosity at nucleotide 296 and 297 resulted in two variants at codon 99 i.e. H99Q (CAC-- > CAA) and H99L (CAC-- > CTA). These variants were observed at < 0.13 frequency in the population under study Table 1. Similarly, two new substitutions at the previously reported polymorphic site i.e. A116T (GCA-- > ACA) and A116E (GCA-- > GAA) were identified. The novel variants at codon 116 were not detected in Afar breed. The A116E variant was observed at 0.03 and 0.10 frequencies in Menz and Washera breeds respectively. A116T was also observed in 8% of Menz and Washera breeds Table 1. A synonymous substitution i.e. N103 N (AAC-- > AAT) at the previously described polymorphic site was also identified. This synonymous variant was not detected in Afar breed.

Table 1 Frequencies of Novel and additional variants in Menz, Washera and Afar sheep breeds of Ethiopia
Full size table

Additional polymorphisms at different positions i.e. G126A (heterozygous and homozygous), G127G (GGG-- > GGT), G127V (heterozygous), G127A (heterozygous), S138S (AGC-- > AGT), I142I (heterozygous), N146S (heterozygous and homozygous), R231R (CGG-- > AGG) and L237L (CTC-- > CTG) were identified Table 1. Most of those polymorphic sites were heterozygous for the specified loci. Potential resistant variants M112T, M137T, R151C and N176K were not detected in the studied breeds. Some of the novel variants are localized in the functional domains of prion protein Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Polymorphisms at cleavage site, palindrome and highly conserved hydrophobic region of PrP

Full size image

In the current study, the highly susceptible haplotypes (i.e. haplotypes categorized under groups 4 and 5) were not detected. Instead, ARQ was the dominant allele in the population under study. The haplotype ARR was observed in Menz and Afar breeds at frequencies of 0.02 and 0.05 respectively. ARH/ARH was the most frequent genotype in Menz breeds (0.31). ARQ/ARQ genotype was highly prevalent in Washera (0.68) and Afar (0.78) breeds Table 2. Neither the highly susceptible, VRQ, nor highly resistant, ARR, genotypes were observed in this study. In the present study, no polymorphism was detected at codon 141 L. The population under study was not in Hardy-Weinberg proportion (χ62: 35.27 27.58 p < 0.05).

Table 2 Scrapie associated allele and genotype frequencies of Menz, Washera Afar sheeps’ PRNP gene
Full size table

Discussion

In the current study, novel amino acid substitutions were detected in the native Ethiopian sheep breed’s PRNP gene. These substitutions (H99L, N103 N, A116T, and A116E) are in a proteinase K resistant region of the prion protein. Variants at codon 99 and 103 are localized closer to the peptide cleavage sites. Variants A116T and A116E are placed in the hydrophobic palindrome region (A116GAAAAG) which is described as the critical motif in the process of conversion of PrPC to PrPSc and its propagation [19]. A previous work by Yang et al., 2014 reported PrP with L141R154 haplotype displayed extended beta sheet in the N-terminal palindromic region than the other variants at these codons [3]. The study also predicted possible correlation between conformational change in ovine PrP upon mutation and different forms of scrapie [3]. Hence, the distinctive physicochemical properties of variants might influence the conformational plasticity of prion protein and could potentially trigger the emergence of new scrapie forms.

As in previous studies, non synonymous and synonymous substitutions i.e. G127G, S138S, R231R, L237L, G126A, 126GA, 127GV, 127GA, 142IT, N146S, N146NS were also identified in the population under study [10,11,12]. In the present study, the variant at codon 127 in particular was highly polymorphic. Amino acids at codon 126 and 127 are localized in the highly conserved glycine rich motif GAVVG126G127LGGYMLG.This residue was reported to antagonize prion disease development by blocking amyloidal fibril formation [2]. A recent work by Vitale et al.,2019 reported polymorphism at this position and implicated its importance in the normal cellular function of prion protein [20]. The sequence variation in palindrome residue (PrP 113–120) and glycine repeat regions (PrP 124–128) synergistically may affect cellular prion protein conformational flexibility.

So far, there are evidences that support the link between scrapie susceptibility, prolonged incubation period and host PRNP genotypes. Known polymorphic alleles at codon 136A/V, 154R/H, and 171R/H/Q are implicated in classical scrapie resistance or susceptibility [7]. A recent work by Cassmann et al., 2019 showed 171Q/K genotypes are also associated to scrapie resistance/susceptibility [21]. In atypical scrapie, AHQ, ARQ and ARR genotypes along with homozygosity for phenylalanine at codon 141 are susceptible haplotypes. ARR genotype which is a central protective haplotype in classical scrapie is not protective in atypical scrapie [9, 22].

In the current study, a significant proportion of the population under study were potentially less resistant to classical and atypical scrapie (fall under scrapie resistance category groups 2 and 3). The haplotype, A136L141R154Q171, was predominant in the population under study. In the present study, the frequency of the ARQ allele was lower in Menz breed than the other two breeds. On the contrary, ARQ was the most prevalent allele in Afar breed. The observed allele frequency variation might be due to the geographic barriers favoring inbreeding and later results in genetic distinction among breeds.

In countries such as Canada and Czech Republic, where scrapie was once apparently prevalent, the resistant haplotype, ARR, became dominant over the previously reported VRQ and ARQ haplotype [4, 23, 24]. Genetic based eradication program is one of the reasons why ARR haplotype is prevalent in such areas [25, 26]. A study by Migliore S. et al.,2017, speculated positive selection on scrapie resistance goat PRNP variants in the places where there was scrapie epidemics [27]. Similarly, in India, China, Israel, Iran, and Turkey where scrapie case has never been epidemic, the predominant allele was ARQ [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Studies from Tunisia and Algeria reported ARQ, ARR, AHQ, ARH, and VRQ as major alleles. In the same studies, additional polymorphisms which were also previously reported in Spanish and Italian sheep breeds were identified [12, 35,36,37]. ARQ was recorded at a significantly higher frequency in scrapie-affected Spanish sheep. At the same time, this genotype was dominant in both healthy and scrapie affected sheep breeds [36]. Similarly, ARQ haplotype was predominant in three Sicilian autochthonous sheep breeds. However, ARR haplotye was also reported at high frequency than other common scrapie associated haplotypes [37]. In rare Greek sheep breeds where scrapie has not yet reported, ARQ haplotype was detected in 50% of the sampled population [38]. Despite the long standing selective breeding programs in European countries, there has been no legalized selective breeding practices for scrapie in Bulgaria. A study reported ARQ and ARR as the predominant haplotypes among selected Bulgarian sheep flocks [39]. The high frequency of ARR could be due to the importation of resistant sheep from elsewhere.

Earlier experimental studies linked specific alleles to survival rate after scrapie infection along with the ARQ genotype. T112ARQ, AT137RQ, AC151RQ, and ARQK176 haplotypes were identified as potential protective variants [9, 40, 41]. In the present study, these haplotypes were not detected. Rather, the wild type variants i.e. M112, M137, R151, and N176 were highly prevalent. Due to the absence of the resistant genotypes and potential protective alleles such as the aforementioned variants, the population under study was genetically less resistant to scrapie.

In recent years community-based breeding programs have been practiced in Ethiopia [16, 17]. Hence, higher genetic diversity i.e. Heterozygosity and scrapie resistant genotypes would be expected. In the present study however, homozygous genotypes were relatively dominant over heterozygous genotypes. This could be due the limited practice of extensive crossbreeding. Inadequate crossbreeding may compromise efficient animal production [42]. However, genetic diversity in native Ethiopian sheep breed’s PRNP was still detected when compared to other breeds worldwide. Therefore, the balance between production improvement through selective breeding and preservation of native breeds should be maintained.

Conclusion

Two of the novel variants at codon 99 and 103 that are placed closer to the proteinase K cleavage site and the variant at codon 116 that is in the hydrophobic palindrome region along with the variants at codon 127 in glycine repeat domain may influence the conformational flexibility of prion protein and /or introduce a new form of scrapie. Due to the high prevalent group 3 and 4 genotypes and the spontaneity of atypical scrapie, the population under study were less resistant to scrapie. These genetic distributions potentially suggest the need for careful selection during crossbreeding and inbreeding. The results of this study also highlighted the genetic diversity of Ethiopian native sheep breed’s PRNP through novel variants and scrapie associated genotype distribution when compared to other breeds worldwide.

Methods

Animal selection

According to FAOSTAT 2018, 31,688,157 sheep are kept for production in Ethiopia. Whole blood was taken from 97 genetically unrelated female native sheep (Washera N = 39, Menz N = 35, and Afar N = 23). The sources of the animals for this study were the regional research centres (Andasa Livestock Research Center (ALRC),Melka-Were agricultural research centre and Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center).

Washera sheep breed is reared in west-east Gojam and AgewAwi zones of Amhara region (Population = 1,227,700) [43]. This breed is commonly known by its short fat tail, short-hair and large body size. Menz sheep breeds are one of the most common sheep breeds in Ethiopia. This breed is distributed in Menz, a zone in North Shewa of Amhara region (Population = 971,400) [43]. Their characteristic feature is a fatty short tail, well developed wooly undercoat with unique spiral horns. Afar sheep, named after the Afar region, are well adapted to harsh environments (Population = 681,900) [43]. These breeds are reared for commercial mutton and wool production. Information on the phenotypes of the breeds was obtained from the Ethiopian Biodiversity booklet, 2018.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction

Genomic DNA was isolated from the EDTA treated blood using a commercial kit (Geneaid). PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) was carried out to amplify the coding region of the PRNP using forward (TCTGCAAGAAGCGACCAAAAC) and reverse (CACAGGAGGGGAAGAAAAGAGG) primers (NM_001009481.1). PCR reaction mixture containing 200 μM of each dNTP, 2 mmol MgCl2, 5 pmol of each primer, 0,05 U Taq polymerase, 10 X PCR buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), 10–50 ng of genomic DNA and ddH2O to a final volume of 12,5 ul was used. 2.5 ul of PCR product was used for further analysis.

Sequencing and bioinformatics

After incubation with 1 U Exo-SAP, a chain termination reaction was performed with BigDye™ terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). At the final stage, all samples were purified by ethanol precipitation method and sequenced by Applied Biosystems 3500 genetic analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). Chromatograms were checked with FinchTV and aligned using Mega v7.0 software. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium state for the multilocus allele was calculated using Popgene 32.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [GeneBank] repository, [MN834021-MN834117].

Abbreviations

PRNP gene:

Prion protein coding gene

PrPC :

Cellular prion

PrPSc :

Scrapie form of prion

A:

Alanine

C:

Cysteine

D:

Aspartic acid

E:

Glutamate

G:

Glycine

H:

Histidine

I:

Isoleucine

K:

Lysine

L:

Leucine

M:

Methionine

N:

Asparagine

P:

Proline

Q:

Glutamine

R:

Arginine

S:

Serine

T:

Threonine

V:

Valine

Y:

Tyrosine

References

  1. 1.

    Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(23):13363–83.

  2. 2.

    Zhang J, Zhang Y. Molecular dynamics studies on 3D structures of the hydrophobic region PrP(109-136). Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2013;45(6):509–19.

  3. 3.

    Yang S, Thackray A, Hopkins L, Monie T, Burke D, Bujdoso R. Polymorphisms at amino acid residues 141 and 154 influence conformational variation in ovine PrP. Biomed Res Int. 2014;14.

  4. 4.

    Cameron C, Bell-Rogers P, McDowall R, Rebelo AR, Cai HY. Prion protein genotypes of sheep as determined from 3343 samples submitted from Ontario and other provinces of Canada from 2005 to 2012. Can J Vet Res. 2014;78(4):260–6.

  5. 5.

    Laegreid WW, Clawson ML, Heaton MP, Green BT, Rourke KI, Knowles DP. Scrapie resistance in ARQ sheep. J Virol. 2008;82(20):10318.

  6. 6.

    Tranulis MA. Influence of the prion protein gene, Prnp, on scrapie susceptibility in sheep. APMIS. 2002;, 110(1):33–43.

  7. 7.

    Baylis M, Goldmann W. The genetics of scrapie in sheep and goats. Curr Mol Med. 2004;4(4):385–96.

  8. 8.

    DEFRA, National Scrpaie Plan for Great Britain. In., Revised edn. London; 2006.

  9. 9.

    Thorgeirsdottir S, Sigurdarson S, Thorisson HM, Georgsson G, Palsdottir A. PrP gene polymorphism and natural scrapie in Icelandic sheep. J General Virol. 1999;80(Pt 9):2527–34.

  10. 10.

    Vaccari G, D'Agostino C, Nonno R, Rosone F, Conte M, Di Bari MA, Chiappini B, Esposito E, De Grossi L, Giordani F, et al. Prion protein alleles showing a protective effect on the susceptibility of sheep to scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. J Virol. 2007;81(13):7306–9.

  11. 11.

    Yaman Y Soysal M. I, Ün C. Evaluation of the genetic resistance status to classical and atypicalscrapie in Karacabey merino rams. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2015; 39(6):736–740.

  12. 12.

    Kdidi S, Yahyaoui MH, Conte M, Chiappini B, Zaccaria G, Ben Sassi M, Ben Ammar El Gaaied A, Khorchani T, Vaccari G. PRNP polymorphisms in Tunisian sheep breeds. Livestock Sci. 2014;167:100–3.

  13. 13.

    Greenwood P. Federal disease control--scrapie. Can Vet J. 2002;43(8):625–9.

  14. 14.

    Hagenaars TJ. Control of scrapie by selective breeding: what are we getting for free? Vet Record. 2014;174(21):528–9.

  15. 15.

    Truscott JE, Ferguson NM: Control of scrapie in the UK sheep population. Epidemiology and infection .2009; 137(6):775–786.

  16. 16.

    Marshall K, Gibson JP, Mwai O, Mwacharo JM, Haile A, Getachew T, Mrode R, Kemp SJ. Livestock Genomics for Developing Countries – African Examples in Practice. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019; 10(297).

  17. 17.

    Getachew T, Haile A, Wurzinger M, Rischkowsky B, Gizaw S, Abebe A, Sölkner J. Review of sheep crossbreeding based on exotic sires and among indigenous breeds in the tropics: an Ethiopian perspective. Afr J Agric Res. 2016;11(11):901–11.

  18. 18.

    EY T, Tesfaye D, and Un C. Valuing the investigation of prion diseases in Ethiopia. Int J Agri Sci Food Technol. 2019:001–5.

  19. 19.

    Acevedo-Morantes CY, Wille H. The structure of human prions: from biology to structural models-considerations and pitfalls. Viruses. 2014;6(10):3875–92.

  20. 20.

    Vitale M, Migliore S, Tilahun B, Abdurahaman M, Tolone M, Sammarco I, Di Marco Lo Presti V, Gebremedhin EZ. Two novel amino acid substitutions in highly conserved regions of prion protein (PrP) and a high frequency of a scrapie protective variant in native Ethiopian goats. BMC Veterinary Research .2019; 15(1):128.

  21. 21.

    Cassmann E. D, Moore S. J, Smith J. D, Greenlee J.J. Sheep With the Homozygous Lysine-171 Prion Protein Genotype Are Resistant to Classical Scrapie After Experimental Oronasal Inoculation. Veterinary pathology .2019; 56(3):409–417.

  22. 22.

    Lühken G, Buschmann A, Brandt H, Eiden M, Groschup M, Erhardt G. Epidemiological and genetical differences between classical and atypical scrapie cases. Vet Res. 2007;38:65–80.

  23. 23.

    Harrington NP, O’Rourke KI, Feng Y, Rendulich J, Difruscio C, Balachandran A. Prion genotypes of scrapie-infected Canadian sheep 1998-2008. Can J Vet Res. 2010;74(3):228–32.

  24. 24.

    Stepanek O, Horin P. Genetic diversity of the prion protein gene (PRNP) coding sequence in Czech sheep and evaluation of the national breeding programme for resistance to scrapie in the Czech Republic. J Appl Genet. 2017;58(1):111–21.

  25. 25.

    CFIA. https://www.inspection.gc.ca/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/scrapie/if-your-animals-may-be-infected/eng/1355963623752/1355963789207. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.

  26. 26.

    USDA. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/sheep-and-goat-health/national-scrapie-eradication-program. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.

  27. 27.

    Migliore S, Agnello S, D'Avola S, Goldmann W, Di Marco Lo Presti V, Vitale M. A cross-sectional study of PRNP gene in two native Sicilian goat populations in Italy: a relation between prion gene polymorphisms and scrapie incidence. J Genet. 2017;96(2):319–25.

  28. 28.

    Choudhary S, Gupta N, Jethra G. Genotyping of PRNP coding region for scrapie in Indian sheep. Iranian J Vet Res. 2014;15:293–6.

  29. 29.

    Guan F, Pan L, Li J, Tang H, Zhu C, Shi G. Polymorphisms of the prion protein gene and their effects on litter size and risk evaluation for scrapie in Chinese Hu sheep. Virus Genes. 2011;43(1):147–52.

  30. 30.

    Alvarez L, Gutierrez-Gil B, Uzun M, Primitivo FS, Arranz JJ. Genetic variability in the prion protein gene in five indigenous Turkish sheep breeds. Small Rumin Res. 2011;99(2):93–8.

  31. 31.

    Frootan F, Nikbakht G, Ozgentürk NO, Un C. Prion protein coding gene (PRNP) variability in sheep from Turkey and Iran. Biochemical genetics .2012; 50(3–4):277–284.

  32. 32.

    Gootwine E, Abdulkhaliq A, Jawasreh KIZ, Valle ZA. Screening for polymorphism at the prion protein (PrP) locus (PRNP) in Awassi and Assaf populations in Israel, the Palestinian authority and Jordan. Small Rumin Res. 2008;77(1):80–3.

  33. 33.

    Ün C, Oztabak K, Ozdemir N, Akıs I, Mengi A. Genotyping of PrP gene in native Turkish sheep breeds. Small Rumin Res. 2008;74(1):260–4.

  34. 34.

    Salami S, Zadeh RA, Omrani MD, Ramezani F, Amniattalab A. Allelic frequency and genotypes of prion protein at codon 136 and 171 in Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds. Prion. 2011;5(3):228–31.

  35. 35.

    Djaout A, Chiappini B, Gaouar SBS, Afri-Bouzebda F, Conte M, Chekkal F, El-Bouyahiaoui R, Boukhari R, Agrimi U, Vaccari G. Biodiversity and selection for scrapie resistance in sheep: genetic polymorphism in eight breeds of Algeria. J Genet. 2018;97(2):453–61.

  36. 36.

    Acín C, Martín-Burriel I, Goldmann W, Lyahyai J, Monzón M, Bolea R, Smith A, Rodellar C, Badiola JJ, Zaragoza P. Prion protein gene polymorphisms in healthy and scrapie-affected Spanish sheep. J Gen Virol. 2004;85(Pt 7):2103–10.

  37. 37.

    Vitale M, Migliore S, La Giglia M, Alberti P, Di Marco Lo Presti V, Langeveld JP. Scrapie incidence and PRNP polymorphisms: rare small ruminant breeds of Sicily with TSE protecting genetic reservoirs. BMC Vet Res .2016; 12(1):141.

  38. 38.

    Ekateriniadou LV, Panagiotidis CH, Terzis A, Ploumi K, Triantafyllidis A, Deligiannidis P, Triantaphyllidis C, Sklaviadis T. Genotyping for PrP gene polymorphisms in rare Greek breeds of sheep. Vet Rec. 2007;160(6):194.

  39. 39.

    Sirakov I, Peshev R, Christova L. Genetic predisposition of some Bulgarian sheep breeds to the scrapie disease. Virus Genes. 2011;43(1):153–9.

  40. 40.

    Heaton MP, Leymaster KA, Freking BA, Hawk DA, Smith TPL, Keele JW, Snelling WM, Fox JM, Chitko-McKown CG, Laegreid WW. Prion gene sequence variation within diverse groups of U.S. sheep, beef cattle, and deer. Mammalian Genome. 2003;14(11):765–77.

  41. 41.

    Ikeda T, Horiuchi M, Ishiguro N, Muramatsu Y, Kai-Uwe GD, Shinagawa M. Amino acid polymorphisms of PrP with reference to onset of scrapie in Suffolk and Corriedale sheep in Japan. J General Virol. 1995;76(Pt 10):2577–81.

  42. 42.

    V. Caro-Petrović MPP, Z. Z Ilic, M.M. Petrović, D. RužićMuslić, N. Maksimović, M. I. Selionova, V. Mandić. Crossing system application and its effect On lambs growth traits. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 2015; 34(4): 505–514.

  43. 43.

    Gizaw S, Komen H, Hanotte O, Arendonk J, Kemp B, Okeyo A, Dessie T. Characterization and conservation of indigenous sheep genetic resources: a practical framework for developing countries. 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Abrham Assefa of EBI, Dr. Dinka Ayana of AAU College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture and Dr. Joram Mwasharo of ILRI, ICARDA for facilitating the work.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Ege University, Department of Biology, Molecular Biology Division, Izmir, Turkey
    • Eden Yitna Teferedegn
    •  & Cemal Un
  2. Department of Biometry and Genetics, Bandirma Sheep Research Institute, Bandirma, Balikesir, Turkey
    • Yalcin Yaman
Authors
  1. Eden Yitna Teferedegn
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Yalcin Yaman
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Cemal Un
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

ET involved in data collection, performed laboratory activities and analyzed and synthesized data and wrote the manuscript. YY engaged in PCR and sequence optimization. CU formulated concept and organized the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cemal Un.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animals were treated with great care and sample was taken according to the institute guideline. Ethical approval is deemed unnecessary according to the Ethiopian National Research Ethics Review Guideline/EFDRE ministry of science and Technology Sep 2014, 5th ed. Article 8.3.5.1, 10.2 and 10.5.1. Written consent was granted to take blood samples from the respective regional state livestock development and promotion offices NS/AR/U-01/42/2010 and NS/AR/U-01/41/2010.Genetic material export permit was assured from Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Ref. No.EBI71/943/2018.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teferedegn, E.Y., Yaman, Y. & Un, C. Five novel PRNP gene polymorphisms and their potential effect on Scrapie susceptibility in three native Ethiopian sheep breeds. BMC Vet Res 16, 122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02336-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethiopian sheep
  • Novel variations
  • Polymorphism
  • Prion gene
  • Scrapie susceptibility

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us