Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

High prevalence of persistently infected animals from bovine viral diarrhea in Colombian cattle

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5 and
  • 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC Veterinary Research201915:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1769-5

  • Received: 4 September 2018
  • Accepted: 27 December 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) is associated with gastrointestinal, respiratory and reproductive diseases of livestock across the world that causes continuous economic losses in the cattle industry. This virus can establish a persistent infection (PI) in calves after the fetal infection, making BVDV positive catle carriers and primary reservoirs which will constantly transmit the virus to healthy and new-born animals. For this reason, the detection of the PI animals in herds is the first line of prevention of the viral infection.

Results

In this study, PI animals were detected in five different regions of Colombia through RT-PCR techniques and confirmed by sequencing. BVDV genotypes were determined using one fragment of the 5’UTR. It was found a 7% BVDV prevalence in animals and 22% in farms; and genotype 1 was identified as a single genotype for all of the samples. All samples were BVDV 1a.

Conclusion

This is the first report in Colombia with higher prevalence rates compared with other places in the world, turned out to be of great importance for the ranchers, the vaccine producers and animal health control parties.

Keywords

  • Bovine viral diarrhea virus
  • Persistently infected animals
  • Genotype

Background

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV) belongs to the genus Pestivirus, within the family Flaviviridae. Based on viral RNA sequence, there are eleven species, two of them are BVDV 1 which is the same Pestivirus A and BVDV 2 which is the same Pestivirus B, both infecting cattle [13]. As well as the viruses of the border disease in sheep (Pestivirus D) and the classical swine fever in swine (Pestivirus C), the BVDV is able to infect a large number of different animal species [3]. This virus is actually classified in species, genotypes and biotypes. The genotypes are mainly determined by the changes in the 5’UTR region, Npro and in the E2 protein-coding region. There are at least 20 genotypes within the BVDV- 1 which is the most common and the less frequent one called BVDV-2 has 4 genotypes more. Recently, HoBi-like pestivirus has been proposed as a new species of the genus based on its genetic and antigenic closeness to BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 [46]. Furthermore, isolates of BVDV can be separated into non-cytopathogenic and cytopathogenic biotypes based on cytopathogenic effects observed in infected cell cultures [4, 7] or for the heterologous recombination between non cytopathic virus and cellular sequences [4, 8].

The BVDV is one of the principal causal agents of respiratory disorders and reproductive diseases including abortions in cattle. The infection by this virus could causes different symptoms in the animals and also the development of the disease in different ways. Usually, the viral infection could be asymptomatic or with few clinical signs like mild fever, lack of appetite, lethargy but in some animals could be involved also with ulcers in the mouth and in the digestive tract, induce respiratory and reproductive implications as well as immunosuppression, in few cases could present a classic or hemorrhagic diarrhea [7, 9].

The second manifestation of the disease, is associated with the transmission of the virus through the placenta from the cow to the calf, depending on the stages of pregnancy, several outcomes could occur including embryonic death, abortion, immunotolerance, birth defects, birth of weak calves although in some cases normal calves could also be born with protective antibodies [7]. PI calves are the result of an in utero infection during the first 120 days of gestation with a noncytopathic biotype of BVDV. Such calves are born immunotolerant to the infecting viral strain and will sustain viral replication and excretion for the rest of their lives. They are consistently viremic, and constantly shed live virus in all bodily secretions. [1, 9] The creation of PI animals only follows infection with viral strains of the noncytopathic biotype, the predominant field biotype [10]. Additionally, all calves born to PI dams will be PI themselves. Many PI animals die within the first year of age; however, others can appear normal and thus serve as the viral reservoir and represent a continuous threat to herd mates and other livestock contacts [10, 11].

In PI animals thrombocytopenic signs are associated with the mucosal membranes and could be seen as hemorrhagic processes with pyrexia, anorexia, acute diarrhea and ulcers in the oral cavity; high mortality rates have been reported under these conditions [4].

BVDV is distributed worldwide and its seroprevalence has been reported between 40 and 80% taking into account the acute infection of the virus; on the other side, PI animals’ prevalence is between 0.5 and 4% although some other studies around the world are needed. Particularly in Colombia there are few studies directed to this virus; in 1996 it was described the presence of PI animals by means of lymphocytes’ cultures obtained from dairy cattle from the Savannah of Bogota [12]. In a recent study conducted by Ortiz et. al in 2016, it was found a seroprevalence of antibodies against the virus in the 32% of the animals and 83% in farms (submitted data). However, the current status of the PI animals is still unknown in the country even though it is essential to know the presence of these animals since it is the first step for the elimination and eradication of the virus in a specific region. For this reason, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of PI animals in some regions of Colombia as well as to identify the circulating species in this population, in order to establish a baseline with respect to the presence of the virus in Colombian cattle.

Results

RT-PCR sensitivity test

In the sensitivity test of the RT-PCR it was possible to amplify the purified plasmid with the viral segment in it until the dilution of 10− 4, which corresponds to a concentration of 0,00539 pM. In the Fig. 1 could be seen the results of the serial dilutions compared with the purified product of the plasmid.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Sensitivity test of the RT-PCR using the purified plasmid pELMO for the detection of the region 5’UTR. Lane 1–100 bp ladder, lane 2 – Purified plasmid product, lane 3–7 – 10-base serial dilutions of the purified plasmid (10-1-10-5). Maximum dilution visualized with this PCR could be seen in lane 6 (10-4), belonging to a minimum concentration of 0.00539 pM

Prevalence of BVDV persistently infected (PI) animals

In the present study, a total of 260 ear notch biopsies were included for the BVDV detection from seronegative cattle collected from 45 farms located in 5 regions of Colombia. A global prevalence of 7% (19/260) was found in the studied population distributed in the country as follows: 10% (4/40) in Caquetá, 13% (7/53) in Antioquia, 9% (4/47) in Cauca, 10% (3/30) in Huila and 1% (1/90) in Sucre. Figure 2 shows the location and the prevalence percentages of PI animals in the different departments of Colombia. At the farm level, it was considered a positive farm if one or more animals were found positive in the PCR test. Thus, from the 45 analyzed farms, 10 of them were found positive to persistently infected animals corresponding to the 22% of all of the properties. The distribution of the positive farms in the 5 regions was: 3 of 5 (60%) in Caquetá, 1 of 3 (33%) in Antioquia, 4 of 20 (20%) in Cauca, 1 of 3 (33%) in Huila and 1 of 14 parcels (7%) in Sucre.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Distribution of BVDV persistently infected animals in Colombia. Green – Sucre, Purple – Antioquia, Red – Cauca, Orange – Huila, Blue – Caquetá

BVDV species and subspecies

In the studied population, the results obtained from the ML phylogenetic tree show that the circulating genotype of BVDV from the Colombian isolates belong to BVDV-1. In the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3a) could be seen three different clades that represent each genotype, in which Colombian isolates obtained from PI animals are located in the BVDV-1 clade, with a bootstrap value of 100. On the other hand, with the results obtained from the likelihood mapping, it was found that the well-resolved tree was about 80.3%. This analysis statistically supports the robustness of the selected genomic region (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic reconstruction of the 5’UTR of BVDV isolated of PI animals. Only 11/19 strains could be sequenced because of the quality of the DNA a) Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis. The evolutionary history was derived using the method of ML based on the model of General Time-Reversible + Gamma Model. The analysis was performed with 26 nucleotide sequences and a total of 325 positions in the data set. Colombian isolates were grouped in the genotype 1 (Blue), (labeled with circles in pink) with a bootstrap of 1. b Sub genotyping the reference strains of BVDV 1 (from a to q) to assemble the tree were selected from the data set of the GenBank. Their accession numbers are included in the tree. These sequences were aligned with the 11 Colombian sequences. The evolutionary history was derived using the method of ML based on the model of General Time-Reversible Model GAMMA and validated using bootstrap analysis with 100 replicates. The analysis involved 28 nucleotide sequences. There were a total of 232 positions in the final dataset. Colombian isolates were grouped in the Subtype 1a (Blue), (labeled with circles in pink) with a bootstrap of 0.62

For genotypes, the reference strains of BVDV-1 (from a to q) to assemble the tree were selected from the data set of the GenBank. Their accession numbers are included in the tree. These sequences were aligned with the 11 Colombian sequences using MUSCLE. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the ML method and validated using bootstrap analysis with 100 replicates. For genotypes, all the Colombian strains were BVDV species G1 genotype a (Fig. 3b) [13, 14].

Discussion

The bovine viral diarrhea is one of the 10 infections in cattle with a highest impact in the animal health [15]. Even if the availability of the vaccine has been considered as one of the main prevention strategies for the viral infection, with the purpose of decreasing the incidence and prevalence rates, this strategy has not been successful at all as high rates of seroprevalence against BVDV are still found worldwide [16]. Thus, establishing the risk factors for the viral infection is a good strategy in order to avoid the viral spread, mainly in the acute infections. However, this strategy is neither enough because it does not prevent the viral spread from the PI animals, due to the fact that these animals excrete huge amounts of viral particles during the course of their lives, and is now considered the main cause of the viral dissemination.

Therefore, the identification and elimination of PI animals in conjunction with the implementation of Good Veterinary Practices as well as biosecurity conditions, are crucial for the control and prevention of the disease [4]. Eradication programs have been successfully carried out in the Scandinavian countries through the implementation of three main practices: identification, elimination and constant monitoring of PI animals in the herds [17].

In pursuance of identifying PI animals in the herds, viral isolations or RT-PCR could be done as diagnostic tests [18]. Unfortunately, given the structural and logistical complications that involves the viral isolation, molecular biology techniques have become a better option for the viral diagnosis. Although the use of these techniques could be very useful, the detection of the virus in serum samples is not as sensitive as it is expected, and thus the use of other samples such as the ear notch biopsies have been used due to the presence of higher amounts of virus in this area [19].

In this study, it was found the presence of PI in seronegative animals by ELISA. In order to find the segment of the genome, RT-PCR technique was done using ear cartilage samples. It was also shown the sensitivity of the technique, which allows the identification of samples with low DNA in concentration no less than 0, 00539 pM of viral genome in the host, which could be a good strategy for seeking of PI animals that are unseen on the herds.

Even though some researchers say that “to distinguish between PI and acute infection, animals showing positive results were re-tested at intervals of at least 2 weeks. Animals that tested positive on both tests were defined as PI, whereas animals with negative results in the second test were designated as having an acute infection” [9] in this group of animals, this possibility was lower because the samples were taken from seronegative animals older than 2 years with no symptoms for more than a month .

Regarding the prevalence of PI animals in Colombia (7% of the studied population), it could be said that these values are higher compared with other countries. In the case of Latin America, PI animals in Brazil were reported between 0.09 and 0.13% [20]; and in Uruguay values of 4.1% were previously shown [21]. In other places such as Belgium, the prevalence was of the 0,32% in the PI population [22] while Houe and co-workers mentioned that the prevalence around the world is between the 0,5 and 2% several years ago [19]. Also when considering the amount of positive farms in Colombia (22%), is an important fact compared with other regions worldwide due to its higher amount of positive farms. In Peru, 4% of dairy herds were found positive, similar to the situation in Japan with 7.6% of positive farms [9, 23]. All these reports belong to cattle under 2 years old. This is different from our results that were obtained in cattle older than this age. This means that the real prevalence of PIs should be higher than we show and that this group represent the option that the virus has to keep inside the asymptomatic and older animals. These PI animal serves as a reservoir for BVDV and are a source of infection for herd mates [7].

These results should be considered by the animal health authorities in order to prevent the spread of the viral infection in the Colombian cattle and thus to improve the health conditions of the animals as well as to reduce the economic impact that this virus causes on the herds. Appropriate measures should be considered in order to counteract the infection of the BVDV not only in Colombia but also in the nearby regions [15].

By the other hand, identifying the circulating species in a specific population should be described mainly together with the vaccines programs in order to have a higher chance of a protective effect and in order to know the epidemiological distribution of the viral infection. The currently available vaccine covers BVDV-1, as it is considered the most prevalent species in the world. Nowadays, it has been described at least 25 different genotypes of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2, with the proposal of a particular geographical distribution [4]. In this study, it was reported the G1a isolated from the Colombian samples. Even if BVDV-1 has been reported as the most frequent species [7], in some other regions different species have been reported. This is the case of previous reports in Brazil [20], Italy [24], India [25], and Bangladesh [26] in which the presence of BVDV-2 and BVDV-3 were reported as the only circulating species, while studies from Uruguay, Argentina and Chile also reported BVDV-1 as a single circulating variant [21, 27, 28]. However, evidence of mixed infections has also been reported as in the case of North America where phylogenetic analyses of the 5’UTR region for 119 isolates revealed the presence of the BVDV-1 and 2 [29]. In Europe, a study performed in Germany, it was found both the BVDV-1 and 2 as well [30]. When the species were typed, BVDV-1a was found in all of them, even when the most frequent genotype is 1b [2, 4, 31, 32]. Just a few regions have this type as a predominant [33]. This means that in case that a vaccination program will be implemented, the vaccine should have, at least, both types.

This is the first report in Colombia in which the circulating genotype in the PI population is reported. These results are not only important for the epidemiological background in the country but also to have an update of the current infection of the BVDV in the herds, which should be considered by the animal health authorities as higher prevalence rates was reported compared with other regions in the world.

Conclusion

The prevalence of PI animals in some regions of Colombian was higher than it was expected. It was found BVDV- 1a as the only genotype circulating within the country. These results should be considered to include the BVDV as a mandatory notification agent in order to decrease the impact of this viral infection in the livestock industry, which still is one of the most important industries in Colombia. An eradication program of the virus is also suggested for the future.

Methods

Samples collection

The samples were obtained from 5 different regions of Colombia (Caquetá, Antioquia, Cauca, Huila and Sucre) including both dairy and beef herds as well as dual purpose. A total of 45 farms located in these regions were included in the study. Sample size was determined using the WinEpiscope platform [31] with the algorithm for estimating a percentage. A 4% prevalence of PI animals was considered [34], with a population of 22,574,780 animals in Colombia (2014 national census report) and a confidence level of 99% with 3% of accepted error. A sample size of 260 animals was considered, and only seronegative animals were included in the study. In order to determine the presence of the virus, ear cartilage was collected from each adult cow (older than 2 years of age and with previous pregnancies). After the ear cartilage sampling the animals keep their normal life.

BVDV antibodies’ detection

As seronegative animals were needed for this study, blood samples were taken first in order to determine the presence of antibodies against the virus using a competitive ELISA kit (INGENESA ®, Spain) approved by the OIE as a diagnostic test. Positive cattle were identified following the manufacturer’s instructions and were not included for the cartilage sample.

Detection of BVDV-persistent infected animals

After serological tests were completed, 260 seronegative cattle were selected for the detection of PI animals. Ear notch biopsies were collected and frozen at − 80 °C until used. About 1 cm3 of tissue was then fragmented in 1 mL of sterile PBS and centrifuged at 13.000×g for 5 min. RNA was extracted from the supernatant using a RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN®, Germany) and stored at − 80 °C until used. Two steps RT-PCR was performed for the detection of the virus, in which the retrotranscription step was carried out with random primers, (Invitrogen® USA), MLV-RT (Invitrogen®, USA), dNTPs (Invitrogen®, USA) and RNA out (Invitrogen®, USA). After this, it was used the cDNA for the PCR using primers previously described [35] directed to the 5’UTR of the virus with an expected product of 288 bp with a PCR master mix (Roche ®). The sensitivity of the PCR was tested by cloning the PCR product on a pELMO vector (See section below) [36]. The results were observed on 1.5% agarose gels prepared in 1× TAE (Biorad®, USA) and dyed with 1× HydraGreen fluorescent inter-calating dye (ACTGene, USA). DNA extracted from a blood sample of an infected animal was used as positive control for BVDV and RNase- and DNase-free water as negative amplification control.

RT-PCR sensitivity test

In order to determine the sensitivity of the RT-PCR used in this study, the purified PCR product was cloned in the pELMO vector [36]. After the PCR amplification of the cDNA directed to the regions of 5’UTR, the PCR product was purified using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega®, USA).. Each purified PCR product was then ligated with the pELMO vector with a T4 DNA ligase (Promega®, USA). Ligation reactions were incubated for 12 h at 16 °C, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The subsequent transformation of E. coli TOP10 was carried out with 100 μL E. coli TOP10 chemically competent cells (Invitrogen®, USA), which facilitates the cloning conditions of the plasmid and consequent selection of the successful clones with ampicillin. Bacterial cells were incubated with 5 μL of the ligation product during 20 min in ice, with a further incubation in heat at 42 °C for 30 s and finally cultured in SOC medium at 37 °C shaking for 1 h. Afterwards, the transformed cells were grown in Luria-Bertani agar plates (LB) containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Transformed cells were verified using colony PCR after 16 h of growth. Colony PCR was performed using directly individual transformed cells placed on the mixture of the PCR including the specific primers of the region cloned in the plasmid, in order to guarantee that the recombinant colony has the plasmid indeed, which were then visualized in 2% agarose gels by horizontal electrophoresis.

The recombinant clones were cultured to purify the plasmid using a Zyppy ™ Plasmid MiniPrep kit (ZYMO RESEARCH®). Purified plasmid DNA was confirmed by sequencing and was used as a template for the sensitivity tests for the PCR. Thus, 10-base serial dilutions of the purified plasmid (126.8 ng/μL) were done, until a final concentration of 10− 5 ng/ μL to determine the detection limit of the PCR.

Sequencing, phylogenetic analysis and genotyping

Virus-positive PCR products were purified from agarose gels using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche®, USA). Concentration of the purified product was verified with a second agarose gel after purification, loading only 1 μL of the final product.

PCR-purified products were sequenced by the Sanger technology with both forward and reverse primers in Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). Sequences obtained were edited by Staden Package (http://staden.sourceforge.net/), giving as a result a consensus sequence per sample. Afterward, combined-multiple alignment (automatic and manual) of all the Colombian sequences was performed using ClustalW in the Mega7 program [13]. For the construction of the data set, it was used the full genome sequences of BVDV previously reported on the GenBank and the Colombian isolates obtained in this study, for a total of 26 sequences with a length of 325 bp each. Data set for phylogenetic reconstruction was obtained and the General Time Reversible (GTR) evolutionary model was used with a gamma distribution regarding Akaike information criteria (AIC). Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed also in MEGA7 software, taking into account gaps with a bootstrap model of 100 replicates for the reliability of the trees. The edition of the trees was performed using the FigTree software version 1.4.1 (Available in http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) and a likelihood mapping was done in the Tree-Puzzle software v.5.2 [37].

Abbreviations

5’UTR: 

Untranslated region

BVDV: 

Bovine viral diarrhea virus

BVDV-1: 

Bovine viral diarrhea virus genotype 1

BVDV-2: 

Bovine viral diarrhea virus genotype 2

BVDV-3: 

Bovine viral diarrhea virus genotype 3

CP: 

Cytopathic biotype

MCMC: 

Markov chain Monte Carlo

ML: 

Maximum likelihood

NCP: 

Non-cytopathic biotypes

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PI: 

Persistently infected

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors want to acknowledge Andrea Ramos from the Molecular Biology and Immunology Department from the Foundation Institute of Immunology of Colombia (FIDIC) for the support given in the construction of the plasmid and Nury Olaya for traduction of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Vecol.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the paper.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, SQ, AC and MG; Methodology, SQ, AC, SS, HC and E.S; Validation, AC and MG; Formal Analysis, SQ, AC and MG; Investigation, SQ, AC and MG; Resources, AS, JT and DO; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, SQ, AC and MG; Writing – Review & Editing, SQ, AC and MG; Visualization, SQ, AC and MG; Supervision, AC and MG; Project Administration, MG; Funding Acquisition, AS, JT and DO″. All authors critically revised the manuscript, approved the final version and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This paper is part of the results of the project called “EVALUACIÓN EPIDEMIOLÓGICA Y MOLECULAR DEL VIRUS DE LA LEUCOSIS BOVINA Y DE LOS VIRUS ASOCIADOS AL COMPLEJO RESPIRATORIO Y REPRODUCTIVO BOVINO, OVINO Y BUFALINO EN COLOMBIA” registered at Acta N° 8 of 2018. COMITÉ DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y ÉTICA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DE LA PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA. And this study was approved by CICUAL at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (A-003-18). The samples were taken in 5 Colombian departments by VECOL veterinarians. They obtained the samples from each farm where they work. The farms do not belong to Vecol. They are responsible for the health of the animals of these farms that is why they have consents informed continuously to take samples for research. It is a verbal consent that has been accepted for more than 10 years.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Escuela de Biología, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Carrera 27 Calle 9, ed 45, Bucaramanga, Colombia
(2)
Departamento de Microbiología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7 No. 40 – 62, Bogotá, Colombia
(3)
Empresa Colombiana de Productos Veterinarios – VECOL, Av. Eldorado 82 -93, Bogotá, Colombia
(4)
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria – CORPOICA, Km 14 Vía Mosquera-Bogotá, Mosquera, Colombia
(5)
Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Carrera 3 Este # 47 A – 15, Bogotá, Colombia

References

  1. Chernick A, Ambagala A, Orsel K, Wasmuth JD, van Marle G, van der Meer F. Bovine viral diarrhea virus genomic variation within persistently infected cattle. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;58:218–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Xue W, Mattick D, Smith L. Protection from persistent infection with a bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) type 1b strain by a modified-live vaccine containing BVDV types 1a and 2, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, parainfluenza 3 virus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine. 2011;29:4657–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith DB, Meyers G, Bukh J, Gould EA, Monath T, Scott Muerhoff A, et al. Proposed revision to the taxonomy of the genus Pestivirus, family Flaviviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98(8):2106–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Yeşilbağ K, Alpay G, Becher P. Variability and Global Distribution of Subgenotypes of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus. Viruses. 2017;9:128. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/9/6/128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Factor C, Yus E, Eiras C, Sanjuan M, Cerviño M, Arnaiz I, et al. Genetic diversity of bovine viral diarrhea viruses from the Galicia region of Spain. Vet Rec Open. 2017;3:1–4.Google Scholar
  6. ICTV. ICTV Virus Taxonomy. 2015. https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_online_report/positive-sense-rna-viruses/w/flaviviridae/361/genus-pestivirus.
  7. Brodersen B. Bovine viral diarrhea virus infections: manifestations of infection and recent advances in understanding pathogenesis and control. Vet Pathol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813520250.
  8. Weber MN, Streck AF, Silveira S, Mosena ACS, da Silva MS, Canal CW. Homologous recombination in pestiviruses: identification of three putative novel events between different subtypes/genogroups. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;30:219–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kameyama K, Konishi M, Tsutsui T, Yamamoto T. Survey for detecting persistently infected cattle with bovine viral diarrhea in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2016;78(8):1329–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Walz P, Grooms D, Passler T, Ridpath J, Tremblay R, Step D, et al. Control of bovine viral diarrhea virus in ruminants. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:476–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Newcomer B, Givens D. Diagnosis and Control of Viral Diseases of Reproductive Importance. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2016;32:425–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.01.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vargas D, Jaime J, Vera V. Perspectivas para el control del Virus de la Diarrea Viral Bovina (BVDV). Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2009;22:677–88.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Houe H. Economic impact of BVDV infection in dairies. Biologicals. 2003;31(2):137–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ridpath J. Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus: Global Status. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2010;26:105–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunn GJ, Saatkamp HW, Humphry RW, Stott AW. Assessing economic and social pressure for the control of bovine viral diarrhoea virus. Prev Vet Med. 2005;72(1–2):149–62 discussion 215-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandvik T. Selection and use of laboratory diagnostic assays in BVD control programmes. Prev Vet Med. 2005;72(1–2):3–16 discussion 215-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Houe H, Lindberg A, Moennig V. Test strategies in bovine viral diarrhea virus control and eradication campaigns in Europe. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2006;18:427–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Silveira S, Baumbach LF, Weber MN, Mosena ACS, da Silva MS, Cibulski SP, et al. HoBi-like is the most prevalent ruminant pestivirus in northeastern Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65(1):e113–e20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Maya L, Puentes R, Reolon E, Acuna P, Riet F, Rivero R, et al. Molecular diversity of bovine viral diarrhea virus in Uruguay. Arch Virol. 2016;161(3):529–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanon JB, Van der Stede Y, Antonissen A, Mullender C, Tignon M, van den Berg T, et al. Distinction between persistent and transient infection in a bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) control programme: appropriate interpretation of real-time RT-PCR and antigen-ELISA test results. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014;61(2):156–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Huamán J, Rivera H, Araínga M, Gavidia C, Manchego A. Diarrea viral bovina y animales portadores del virus en hatos productores de leche de la irrigación de majes, arequipa. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 2007;18(2) https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v18i2.1290.
  24. Giammarioli M, Ridpath JF, Rossi E, Bazzucchi M, Casciari C, De Mia GM. Genetic detection and characterization of emerging HoBi-like viruses in archival foetal bovine serum batches. Biologicals. 2015;43(4):220–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishra N, Rajukumar K, Pateriya A, Kumar M, Dubey P, Behera SP, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of novel and divergent HoBi-like pestiviruses from naturally infected cattle in India. Vet Microbiol. 2014;174(1–2):239–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Haider N, Rahman MS, Khan SU, Mikolon A, Gurley ES, Osmani MG, et al. Identification and epidemiology of a rare HoBi-like pestivirus strain in Bangladesh. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014;61(3):193–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Pecora A, Malacari DA, Ridpath JF, Perez Aguirreburualde MS, Combessies G, Odeon AC, et al. First finding of genetic and antigenic diversity in 1b-BVDV isolates from Argentina. Res Vet Sci. 2014;96(1):204–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pizarro-Lucero J, Celedon MO, Aguilera M, de Calisto A. Molecular characterization of pestiviruses isolated from bovines in Chile. Vet Microbiol. 2006;115(1–3):208–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Workman AM, Heaton MP, Harhay GP, Smith TP, Grotelueschen DM, Sjeklocha D, et al. Resolving bovine viral diarrhea virus subtypes from persistently infected U.S. beef calves with complete genome sequence. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2016;28(5):519–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tajima M, Frey HR, Yamato O, Maede Y, Moennig V, Scholz H, et al. Prevalence of genotypes 1 and 2 of bovine viral diarrhea virus in Lower Saxony, Germany. Virus Res. 2001;76(1):31–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Thrusfield M, Ortega C, de Blas I, Noordhuizen JP, Frankena K. WIN EPISCOPE 2.0: improved epidemiological software for veterinary medicine. Vet Rec. 2001;148(18):567–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ebranati E, Lauzi S, Cerutti F, Caruso C, Masoero L, Moreno A, et al. Highlighting priority areas for bovine viral diarrhea control in Italy: a phylogeographic approach. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;58:258–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien E, Garvey M, Walsh C, Arkins S, Culliname A. Genetic typing of bovine viral diarrhoea virus in cattle on Irish farms. Res Vet Sci. 2017;111:14–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu Z, Van Ryk D, Davis C, Abrams WR, Chaiken I, Magnani J, et al. Salivary agglutinin inhibits HIV type 1 infectivity through interaction with viral glycoprotein 120. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2003;19(3):201–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Vilcek S, Elvander M, Ballagi-Pordany A, Belak S. Development of nested PCR assays for detection of bovine respiratory syncytial virus in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(9):2225–31.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramos A, Muñoz M, Moreno-Pérez D, Patarroyo M. pELMO, an optimised in-house cloning vector. AMB Expr. 2017;7(26).Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(3):502–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement