Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Epidemiological survey of sheep as potential hosts for Leishmania in China

BMC Veterinary Research201814:378

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1701-z

  • Received: 18 April 2018
  • Accepted: 20 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Leishmania parasites cause visceral leishmaniasis (VL), an important infectious disease that is endemic to large parts of the world and often leads to epidemics. Sand flies are the primary transmission vector for the parasite in endemic regions. We hypothesized that sheep might serve as an overlooked reservoir for Leishmania transmission to humans due to the asymptomatic nature of infection in many species. As a preliminary test of this hypothesis, the aim of the present study was to investigate sheep in an area of China that is endemic for the desert sub-type of zoonotic VL and establish if they are potential carriers of Leishmania.

Results

Sheep tissue samples were collected from abattoirs in VL endemic areas of Jiashi County, China during the non-transmission season. rK39 immunochromatographic tests were performed to detect the presence of the parasite in blood samples. In addition, DNA was extracted from the blood, and used for detection of the Leishmania-specific internal transcribed spacer-1 (ITS-1) genomic region using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach. PCR products were further analyzed to identify restriction fragment-length polymorphism patterns and representative sequences of each pattern were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The rK-39 and nested PCR data indicated positive detection rates for Leishmania in sheep of 26.32 and 54.39%, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that all of the samples belonged to the species L. infantum and were closely related to strains isolated from human infections in the same area.

Conclusions

Sheep could be a potential host for Leishmania in VL endemic areas in China and may be an overlooked reservoir of human VL transmission in this region. To further confirm livestock as a potential host, further verification is required using a sand fly biting experiment.

Keywords

  • Leishmania
  • Visceral leishmaniasis
  • China
  • Phylogenetics
  • Sheep
  • Reservoir

Background

Kala-azar, also known as visceral leishmaniasis (VL), is a parasitic disease caused by various Leishmania species and is endemic in many countries. Sand flies are the main transmission vector for the disease. The primary clinical features of VL include long-term irregular fevers, splenomegaly, anemia, emaciation, leukopenia, and an increase in serum globulin levels. Most untreated VL patients die within 2 years of contracting the illness due to related complications [13]. Approximately 200,000–400,000 new cases of VL are reported annually, with more than 90% found in India, Bangladesh, Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia, and Brazil [4, 5]. In China, VL is characterized according to differences in endemic area, pathogen species, and vector species into anthroponotic VL, a mountain sub-type of zoonotic VL, and a desert sub-type of zoonotic VL [6, 7]. The desert sub-type of zoonotic VL is specifically caused by Leishmania infantum [8, 9] and is most prevalent in Minfeng, the Bachu Reclamation Regions, the eastern regions of Jiashi in Xinjiang, Ejin Banner in Inner Mongolia, and Dunhuang in Gansu [1012]. The desert sub-type of zoonotic VL is highly endemic to Jiashi County of Kashgar Prefecture in Xinjiang which is located near the central and lower reaches of the Tian Shan mountain range floodplain in the western margins of the Tarim Basin [13, 14]. Most patients with this sub-type are infants under 2 years of age and the mortality rate can reach 95% or higher if left untreated [15]. In 2007, only 19 cases of VL were reported in Jiashi County; however, there were 214 reported cases in 2008, largely due to the fact VL is often neglected and its severity is thus underestimated [1618]. Moreover, accumulating evidence in recent years points to a continuing upward trend of leishmaniasis cases in the region, suggesting an epidemic outbreak [19].

Gaining a detailed understanding of this situation is further complicated by the fact that humans and animals infected with Leishmania are often asymptomatic or show latent infections. These asymptomatic hosts may therefore play an important role in the transmission of the parasite [2023]. Based on previous evidence, it has been proposed that natural foci exist within the desert sub-type of zoonotic VL endemic areas and that wild animals may serve as hosts [2428]. Although the local residents of this area do not tend to keep dogs as pets, wild rodents and other domestic animals have been considered to be potential hosts for Leishmania in other regions [29, 30]. Accordingly, since sheep are by far the most common livestock animal in Jiashi County, we hypothesized that sheep might be an overlooked reservoir of Leishmania in this region, contributing to the increasing incidence of leishmaniasis. Importantly, the small number of VL cases in China suggests that the disease could feasibly be eliminated if appropriate control strategies are implemented. However, the main source of VL infection in the desert sub-type of zoonotic VL endemic areas is still unknown, thereby hindering such efforts [25, 27, 31]. In addition, there are currently no strategies or programs in place to control the disease, except for treating patients on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, identifying the primary host species for Leishmania in China would be an important step towards the prevention of VL. A critical tool that can be used for such analysis is Leishmania-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) region between the genes encoding the SSU and 5.8S rRNAs. [32, 33]. To identify potential sources of VL transmission in China, we used both rK39 immunochromatographic tests and ITS-1 nested PCR to examine Leishmania infection rates in tissue samples from sheep collected in endemic areas of the desert sub-type of zoonotic VL. We also performed phylogenetic analysis and compared the strains isolated from sheep with those retrieved from human patients in the same area.

Results

Sheep Leishmania infection rate determined using rK39 assays

A total of 114 sheep were investigated in this survey, including 99 males and 15 females. The positive detection rate of sheep blood samples was 26.32% (30/114), determined using the rK39 immunochromatographic strip test (Table 1). There were no significant differences between positive detection rates in sheep of different dental ages (P > 0.05, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test were applied to compare data between genders within dental ages and the total) (Table 1).
Table 1

Relationship among VL infection, gender, and dental age of sheep, detected using the rK39 test

Dental Age (months)

Male Sheep

Female Sheep

Statistical test

Number

Number of Positive

Positive rate

Number

Number of Positive

Positive rate

χ2

P value

 ~ 2

70

19

27.14%

6

2

33.33%

9.07E-31

1.00

 ~ 4

20

5

25.00%

0

0

 ~ 6

9

2

22.22%

9

2

22.22%

1.00

Total

99

26

26.26%

15

4

23.67%

2.14E-31

1.00

PCR Polymerase chain reaction

Sheep Leishmania infection rate determined using nested PCR

The 285-bp bands representing the ITS-1 target sequence of Leishmania were successfully amplified in many of the nested PCRs (Fig. 1), and no bands of other sizes were detected. The positive infection rate of Leishmania across all sheep was 54.39% (62/114) using this method (Table 2). Again, no significant differences were found in the positive detection rates among sheep of different dental ages (P > 0.05, χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate to compare data between genders within dental ages and the total) (Table 2).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Nested PCR amplification of the ITS-1 region in sheep. M: 50 bp DNA marker; 101–118: whole sheep blood DNA as a template; LS: positive control; NC: negative control

Table 2

Relationship among VL infection, gender, and dental age of sheep, detected using nested PCR tests

Dental Age (months)

Male Sheep

Female Sheep

Statistical test

Number

Number of Positive

Positive rate

Number

Number of Positive

Positive rate

χ2

P value

 ~ 2

70

40

57.14%

6

3

50%

0.00

1.00

 ~ 4

20

10

50.00%

0

0

 ~ 6

9

3

33.33%

9

6

66.67%

0.35

Total

99

53

53.54%

15

9

60%

0.04

0.85

PCR Polymerase chain reaction

RFLP analysis

The HaeIII restriction maps of all positive ITS-1 nested PCR products were determined to be identical, with bands 161 bp, 69 bp, and 55 bp in size (Fig. 2). This indicated that the target bands all originated from genetically similar parasite strains.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

HaeIII restriction map of nested ITS-1 PCR from sheep samples. M: 50 bp DNA marker; 32–51: whole sheep blood DNA as a template; LS: positive control; NC: negative control

Phylogenetic analysis

As shown in Fig. 3, the target sequences (i.e., those most closely related to the LS-36 strain, identified in this study) isolated from the sheep blood samples (GenBank:KT153645) and LS-Y (the positive control Leishmania strain MHOM/CN/08/JS-1, GenBank:KT153649) clustered in the same phylocluster. This suggests that the local sheep were infected with L. infantum. Importantly, LS-36 clustered together with sequences obtained from blood samples isolated from human VL patients from Jiashi County (XJR-25, GenBank:KT153646).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS-1 sequence obtained from positive sheep. LS-36: sheep tissue samples; XJR-25: VL patient blood samples; LS-Y (MHOM/CN/08/JS-1): positive control

Discussion

Some studies have suggested that asymptomatic infected humans may play an important role in the spread of anthroponotic Leishmania donovani, although further verification by xenodiagnosis using the competent phlebotomine vector Phlebotomus argentipes is required [21, 22, 34, 35]. Given the equally high rate of asymptomatic livestock, the possibility that asymptomatic sheep may also serve as an overlooked host for Leishmania in endemic areas cannot be excluded [36]. In our study area in China, wild rodents such as Lepus yarkandensis and asymptomatic infected humans are generally considered to be the potential hosts of Leishmania, and most infections have thus far been limited to infants under two years of age [15, 37]. In these endemic areas, cases of leishmaniasis are temporally isolated, with a season of high incidence between September to March and peak incidence from October to December. However, there has been a trend in recent years towards increasing Leishmania outbreaks [19],and several patients have become ill during the non-transmission season, although they recovered after treatment. These patients were unlikely to be a source of infection for the sand fly vector Phlebotomus wui, especially during the non-transmission period when the vector is not present. There are three conditions necessary for the maintenance of mediated infectious disease foci: presence of a pathogen, a transmission vector, and an appropriate host. P. wui has previously been determined to be the main vector for Leishmania in the endemic desert sub-type of zoonotic VL areas of Jiashi County. The species usually begins to appear in early May and disappears in early September, matching the high Leishmania transmission season [38, 39]. In our study, the samples were collected from sheep in April, which is the non-transmission season but is close to the next transmission season. However, we consider that the detection of Leishmania infection in sheep at this time is unlikely to have arisen due to P. wui transmission, although this could reflect sand fly infection from the previous season.

The conventional method to detect the parasites that cause VL is to use an rK39 dipstick, which is an in vitro diagnostic medical device designed for the qualitative detection of antibodies specific to members of the L. donovani complex in human serum [4042]. However, this tool can only be used to identify patients with active disease and cannot detect asymptomatic carriers [4347]. Leite et al. [48] evaluated the detection efficiencies of ITS-1 nested PCR and kDNA PCR hybridization to detect L. infantum infections in asymptomatic dogs, and found that the detection rate of ITS-1 nested PCR was up to 83.3% for conjunctival swabs and 56.7% for blood samples, which was higher than the13.3% detection efficiency for the kDNA PCR hybridization method. Pilatti et al. [49] also found that ITS-1 nested PCR detection rates were equally high (73.9%) for symptomatic dogs. These studies indicate that ITS-1 nested PCR has excellent detection sensitivity for both symptomatic and asymptomatic Leishmania-infected animals [50, 51]. We further confirmed this good detection sensitivity of Leishmania in this region of China with a much higher detection rate from ITS-1 nested PCR (54.39%) than obtained with the rK39 test (26.32%).These results confirm that the ITS-1 nested PCR is a highly specific and sensitive method for detecting Leishmania infection.

Finally, our phylogenetic analysis indicated that the sheep were specifically infected with L. infantum. There was a close phylogenetic relationship between the LS-36 strain identified in the sheep and the XJR-25 strain isolated from human VL patients from Jiashi County. This indicates that Leishmania transmission could potentially occur between sheep and humans in this area of China; however, further investigations on potential sheep infectiousness through xenodiagnosis assays using competent phlebotomine vectors (e.g. P. wui), are still needed to understand the transmission routes in this region.

One main caveat of the study is that although the sheep were bred and raised locally, imported sheep largely come from the Ili region of Xinjiang. The majority of imported sheep have been in Jiashi County for 0.5–1 years and our data cannot determine whether they became infected with Leishmania locally or arrived with the infection. However, as the Ili region is not endemic for VL, we consider it unlikely that they were infected before transfer.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that asymptomatic sheep infected with Leishmania contribute to VL transmission between seasons in China. This overlooked reservoir represents an important potential source of local infection for the human population across seasons. Although further verification by Phlebotomus argentipes xenodiagnosis is still needed, our study suggests that consideration of asymptomatic sheep as hosts will be crucial for the future development of VL prevention strategies.

Methods

Experimental setting and collection of blood samples from sheep

During mid-to-late April of 2014, a total of 114 samples of approximately 3 mL blood were collected from sheep in 6-mL ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood collection tubes (BD Vacutainer; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The animals were all at least 1 year of age when slaughtered and were selected from local abattoirs with the approval and management of animal husbandry and veterinary departments in the endemic areas of Jiashi County. Sampling was performed in abattoirs of six townships across the county (Fig. 4). All samples were identified with a unique number code and stored at 4 °C until use. The study did not involve animal husbandry or sacrifice, and samples were collected from scheduled slaughters without influencing abattoir routines.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Distribution of sampling locations. A total of 31 and 10 samples of sheep were collected from the abattoirs of Wolituogelake and Jiashi Zongchang townships, respectively. A total of 49, 2, 19, and 3 samples of sheep were collected from the abattoirs of Mixia, Xiaputule, Hexiaawati, and Guleluke townships, respectively

rK39 strip tests

For the immunochromatographic identification of Leishmania infection, 20 μL samples of whole blood were taken and added to the sample pads of rK39 strips (InBios, Seattle, WA, USA), followed by the addition of 1–2 drops of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Results were obtained by visually assessing the strip for the presence of bands after 5–10 min.

DNA extraction

Total DNA was extracted from 300 μL whole blood using an SE Blood DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified DNA was stored at − 20 °C until analysis.

Nested PCR for Leishmania ITS-1 detection

Extracted DNA samples were used the template in ITS-1 nested PCR [32] with the primers indicated by Ferreira et al. [33]. Primers were synthesized by Invitrogen Trading Shanghai Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). An Applied Biosystems PCR thermocycler was used for all reactions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The first round of PCR was performed using a total volume of 50 μL, including 1 μL DNA template, 25 μL MAX PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), 1 μL of each primer (5′-CTGGATCATTTTCCGATG-3′ and 5′-TGATACCACTTATCGCACTT-3′) at 10 μM, and ddH2O to reach the final volume. Positive and negative controls were also included, with DNA from L. infantum strain MHOM/CN/08/JS-1 as the positive control. The PCR conditions were 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The second PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μL, including 10 μL of a 1:40 dilution of the PCR products from the first PCR as a template, 12.5 μL MAX PCR Master Mix, 1 μL each primer at 10 μM, and up to 25 μL ddH2O to reach the final volume. The PCR conditions were the same as those used in the first reaction. The sizes of the target fragment were between 280 and 330 bp and were detected by electrophoresis of 5 μL of the PCR products from the second reaction on a 1.5% agarose gel, visualized using a gel imager.

Restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

ITS-1 positive nested PCR products were digested using 1 μL of the restriction endonuclease HaeIII (TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd.; 50 ng/μL), 2 μL 10 × M Buffer, ≤ 1 μg DNA, and 20 μL sterilized water. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C in a water bath for 1 h. Next, 5 μL of the digested product was separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel to obtain restriction maps for RFLPs. If ITS-1 positive nested PCR products had the same restriction maps, they were considered to be from the same phylogenetic group. Representative samples of DNA from each group were sent to Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for direct sequencing in both directions using the PCR primers.

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequences were edited using DNAstar software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA), and BLAST (National Center of Biotechnology Information, NCBI) was used to determine related strains by identifying published sequences with high homology to the target sequence. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were performed using ClustalW and a neighbor-joining method using MEGA 5.0 (DNASTAR Inc.), respectively.

Abbreviations

EDTA: 

Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid

ITS-1: 

Specific internal transcribed spacer-1

PBS: 

Phosphate buffered saline

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

RFLP: 

Restriction fragment-length polymorphism

VL: 

Visceral leishmaniasis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Jun-Yun Wang (National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention) for supplying the standard strain of L. infantum (MHOM/CN/08/JS-1). We also thank Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regional CDC and Kashgar Prefectural CDC for their help with the fieldwork. Finally, we are grateful to all of the reviewers who have provided valuable comments for this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program (No. 2014BAI13B05). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

WPW, SH, and CJZ designed the study and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. WPW is the overall project leader. SH, KC, IO, JZ, and KK implemented the study and collected the samples. WPW and YYH were in charge of field work coordination to ensure that the project was implemented properly. SH, LYW, and YW were responsible for the lab testing of the samples, supervised data entry, and analyzed the data. KC was involved in manuscript drafting and revision. WPW and CJZ reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committees of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No. 2014–009), and complied with applicable laws and regulations, with the approval and management of animal husbandry and veterinary departments of Jiashi County.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Health, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200025, China
(2)
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regional Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi, China
(3)
Kashgar Prefectural Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kashgar, China
(4)
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China

References

  1. Alvar J, Yactayo S, Bern C. Leishmaniasis and poverty. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:552–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Desjeux P. Leishmaniasis. Public health aspects and control. Clin Dermatol. 1996;14:417–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boelaert M, Criel B, Leeuwenburg J, Van Damme W, Le Ray D, Van der Stuyft P. Visceral leishmaniasis control: a public health perspective. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:465–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Guerin PJ, Olliaro P, Sundar S, Boelaert M, Croft SL, Desjeux P, Wasunna MK, Bryceson AD. Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:494–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vries HJ, Reedijk SH, Schallig HD. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: recent developments in diagnosis and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16:99–109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu HG, Zhong L, Guan LR, Qu JQ, Hu XS, Chai JJ, Xu ZB, Wang CT, Chang KP. Separation of Chinese Leishmania isolates into five genotypes by kinetoplast and chromosomal DNA heterogeneity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50:763–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang JY, Cui G, Chen HT, Zhou XN, Gao CH, Yang YT. Current epidemiological profile and features of visceral leishmaniasis in people's Republic of China. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao DP, Guo XG, Chen DL, Chen JP. Species delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Chinese Leishmania isolates reexamined using kinetoplast cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Parasitol Res. 2011;109:163–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang BB, Guo XG, Hu XS, Zhang JG, Liao L, Chen DL, Chen JP. Species discrimination and phylogenetic inference of 17 Chinese Leishmania isolates based on internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:1049–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guan LR. Present situation of visceral leishmaniasis and prospect for its control in China. Chinese J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2009;27:394–7 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  11. Guan LR, Shen WX. Recent advances in visceral leishmaniasis in China. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991;22:291–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zheng CJ, Xue CZ, Wu WP, Zhou XN. Epidemiological characteristics of Kala-azar disease in China, during 2005–2015. Chinese J Epidemiol. 2017;38:431–4 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  13. Guan LR, Zuo XP, Yimamu. Reemergence of visceral leishmaniasis in Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. Chinese J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2003;21:285 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  14. Wang LY, Wu WP, Fu Q, Guan YY, Han S, Niu YL, Tong SX, Osman I, Zhang S, Kaisar K. Spatial analysis of visceral leishmaniasis in the oases of the plains of Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bern C, Maguire JH, Alvar J. Complexities of assessing the disease burden attributable to leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e313.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mosleh IM, Geith E, Natsheh L, Abdul-Dayem M, Abotteen N. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Jordanian side of the Jordan Valley: severe under-reporting and consequences on public health management. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13:855–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh SP, Reddy DC, Rai M, Sundar S. Serious underreporting of visceral leishmaniasis through passive case reporting in Bihar, India. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:899–905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zijlstra EE. Visceral leishmaniasis: a forgotten epidemic. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:561–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang JY, Gao CH, Yang YT, Chen HT, Zhu XH, Lv S, Chen SB, Tong SX, Steinmann P, Ziegelbauer K, et al. An outbreak of the desert sub-type of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Jiashi, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, People's Republic of China. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:331–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu Q, Wu WP, Tong SX, Israyil O, Zhang S, Iskender K. Study on time-space clustering regarding the distribution of visceral leishmaniasis in Kashgar Region, Xinjiang. Chinese J Epidemiol. 2009;30:6–9 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  21. Bern C, Haque R, Chowdhury R, Ali M, Kurkjian KM, Vaz L, Amann J, Wahed MA, Wagatsuma Y, Breiman RF, et al. The epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis and asymptomatic leishmanial infection in a highly endemic Bangladeshi village. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:909–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Topno RK, Das VN, Ranjan A, Pandey K, Singh D, Kumar N, Siddiqui NA, Singh VP, Kesari S, Kumar N, et al. Asymptomatic infection with visceral leishmaniasis in a disease-endemic area in Bihar, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:502–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Moreno I, Álvarez J, García N, de la Fuente S, Martínez I, Marino E, Toraño A, Goyache J, Vilas F, Domínguez L, et al. Detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in sylvatic lagomorphs from an epidemic area of Madrid using the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test. Vet Parasitol. 2014;199:264–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guan LR. Current status of kala-azar and vector control in China. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69:595–601.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Del Rio L, Chitimia L, Cubas A, Victoriano I, De la Rúa P, Gerrikagoitia X, Barral M, Muñoz-García CI, Goyena E, García-Martínez D, et al. Evidence for widespread Leishmania infantum infection among wild carnivores in L. infantum periendemic northern Spain. Prev Vet Med. 2014;113:430–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kassiri H, Naddaf SR, Javadian EA, Mohebali M. First report on isolation and characterization of Leishmania major from Meriones hurrianae (Rodentia: Gerbillidae) of a rural cutaneous leishmaniasis focus in South-Eastern Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15:789–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Millan J, Ferroglio E, Solano-Gallego L. Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2005–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Donalisio MR, Paiz LM, da Silva VG, Richini-Pereira VB, von Zuben APB, Castagna CL, Motoie G, Hiramoto RM, Tolezano JE. Visceral leishmaniasis in an environmentally protected area in southeastern Brazil: epidemiological and laboratory cross-sectional investigation of phlebotomine fauna, wild hosts and canine cases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005666.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Bhattarai NR, Van der Auwera G, Rijal S, Picado A, Speybroeck N, Khanal B, De Doncker S, Das ML, Ostyn B, Davies C, et al. Domestic animals and epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis, Nepal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:231–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh N, Mishra J, Singh R, Singh S. Animal reservoirs of visceral leishmaniasis in India. J Parasitol. 2013;99:64–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gao CH, Wang JY, Zhang S, Yang YT, Wang Y. Survey of wild and domestic mammals for infection with Leishmania infantum following an outbreak of desert zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Jiashi, People's Republic of China. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Schonian G, Nasereddin A, Dinse N, Schweynoch C, Schallig HD, Presber W, Jaffe CL. PCR diagnosis and characterization of Leishmania in local and imported clinical samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;47:349–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Carvalho Ferreira AL, Carregal VM, de Almeida FS, Leite RS, de Andrade AS. Detection of Leishmania infantum in 4 different dog samples by real-time PCR and ITS-1 nested PCR. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78:418–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stauch A, Sarkar RR, Picado A, Ostyn B, Sundar S, Rijal S, Boelaert M, Dujardin JC, Duerr HP. Visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent: modelling epidemiology and control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1405.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiwary P, Singh SS, Kushwaha AK, Rowton E, Sacks D, Singh OM, Sundar S, Lawyer P. Establishing, expanding, and certifying a closed colony of Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) for xenodiagnostic studies at the kala azar medical research center, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India. J Med Entomol. 2017;54:1129–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Esteva L, Vargas C, Vargas de León C. The role of asymptomatics and dogs on leishmaniasis propagation. Math Biosci. 2017;293:46–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Liao LF, Yan SS, Wu SBT, Wu M, Xu B, Zhang Y, Hou YY, Lei G. The first isolation of Leishmania infantum from Lepus yarkandensis. Chinese J Vect Biol Contr. 2009:45–7 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  38. Guan LR, Cai CJ, Zuo XP. Progress of biological study on sandflies in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, China. End Dis Bull. 1999;14:87–91.Google Scholar
  39. Gu DA, Zuo XP, Osman Y, Lan QX, Jin CF, Zhou XJ, Wei F, Zhang Y. Investigation on transmitting vectors of visceral leishmaniasis in Jiashi County, Xinjiang. Chinese J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2010;28:280–3 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  40. Srividya G, Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Salotra P. Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: developments over the last decade. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:1065–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Georgiadou SP, Makaritsis KP, Dalekos GN. Leishmaniasis revisited: current aspects on epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Transl Int Med. 2015;3:43–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Maia Z, Lírio M, Mistro S, Mendes CM, Mehta SR, Badaro R. Comparative study of rK39 Leishmania antigen for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1484.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Guan LR, Qu JQ, Cai JJ, Matsumoto Y, Chang KP. Detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis by rK 39 antigen dipstick method. Chinese J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2001;19:58 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  44. Matlashewski G, Das VN, Pandey K, Singh D, Das S, Ghosh AK, Pandey RN, Das P. Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar India: comparison of the rK39 rapid diagnostic test on whole blood versus serum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2233.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Molinet FJ, Ampuero JS, Costa RD, Noronha EF, Romero GA. Specificity of the rapid rK39 antigen-based immunochromatographic test Kalazar detect(r) in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108:293–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Qu JQ, Guan LR, Shulidan I, Zuo XP, Chai JJ, Chen SB, Kawazu S, Katakura K, Matsumoto Y, Reed SG, et al. Rapid screening with a recombinant antigen (rK39) for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis using dipstick. Chinese J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2000;18:155–8 [Article in Chinese].Google Scholar
  47. Regina-Silva S, Fortes-Dias CL, Michalsky ÉM, França-Silva JC, Quaresma PF, da Rocha Lima AC, Teixeira-Neto RG, Dias ES. Evaluation of parasitological examination, kDNA polymerase chain reaction and rK39-based immunochromatography for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in seropositive dogs from the screening-culling program in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47:462–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Leite RS, de Almeida FS, Ituassu LT, de Melo MN, de Andrade AS. PCR diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in asymptomatic dogs using conjunctival swab samples. Vet Parasitol. 2010;170:201–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pilatti MM, de Almeida FS, de Melo MN, de Andrade AS. Comparison of PCR methods for diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in conjunctival swab samples. Res Vet Sci. 2009;87:255–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ajaoud M, Es-sette N, Hamdi S, El-Idrissi AL, Riyad M, Lemrani M. Detection and molecular typing of Leishmania tropica from Phlebotomus sergenti and lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis in an emerging focus of Morocco. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Muccio D, Veronesi F, Antognoni MT, Onofri A, Piergili Fioretti D, Gramiccia M. Diagnostic value of conjunctival swab sampling associated with nested PCR for different categories of dogs naturally exposed to Leishmania infantum infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:2651–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement