Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Characterization of endocannabinoids and related acylethanolamides in the synovial fluid of dogs with osteoarthritis: a pilot study

BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:309

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1245-7

Received: 22 February 2017

Accepted: 30 October 2017

Published: 6 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Cannabis-based drugs have been shown to be effective in inflammatory diseases. A number of endocannabinoids including N- arachidonoylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) with activity at the cannabinoid receptors (CBR) CBR1 and CBR2, have been identified. Other structurally related endogenous fatty acid compounds such as oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA) have been identified in biological tissues. These compounds do not bind to CBR but might be involved in facilitating the actions of directly acting endocannabinoids and thus are commonly termed “entourage” compounds due to their ability to modulate the endocannabinoid system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of endocannabinoids and entourage compounds in the synovial fluid of dogs with osteoarthritis subjected to arthrotomy of the knee joint. Cytokines and cytology were studied as well.

Results

AEA, 2-AG, OEA and PEA were all present in the synovial fluid of arthritic knees and in the contralateral joints; in addition, a significant increase of OEA and 2AG levels were noted in SF from OA knees when compared to the contralateral joints.

Conclusion

The identification and quantification of endocannabinoids and entourage compounds levels in synovial fluids from dogs with OA of the knee is reported for the first time. Our data are instrumental for future studies involving a greater number of dogs. Cannabinoids represent an emerging and innovative pharmacological tool for the treatment of OA and further studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabinoids in veterinary medicine.

Keywords

  • Endocannabinoid system
  • Entourage compounds
  • Synovial fluid
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Dog

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA), also known as degenerative joint disease (DJD), is characterized by a gradual loss of cartilage and results in the development of bony spurs and cysts at the margins of the joints [1]. The articular cartilage is damaged by a complex interplay of genetic, metabolic, biochemical and biomechanical factors followed by activation of inflammatory responses involving the cartilage, subchondral bone and synovium [2]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are abundant in OA [3, 4]. OA is one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal diseases in dogs and it is a significant cause of pain and disability [5].

Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs do not always provide adequate pain relief and may have severe side effects [6]. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of treatments for arthritis. Over the last two decades a new biochemical/physiological signaling system, the endocannabinoid system (ECS), composed of two cannabinoid receptors and their ligands has been described [7].

The ECS has been implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological processes [8]. Cannabinoid receptor activation can modulate inflammation and nociception in animal models of joint inflammation [9, 10]. To date two cannabinoid receptors, have been cloned [cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CBR1) and cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CBR2)], and the two major endogenous endocannabinoids have been identified as arachidonoyl ethanolamide [anandamide (AEA)] and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) [11].

Other structurally related endogenous fatty acid compounds such as oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) have been identified in biological tissues. These compounds do not bind to cannabinoid receptors but may facilitate the action of endocannabinoids and are termed “entourage” compounds due to their ability to modulate the ECS [12, 13]. However, OEA and PEA can directly activate other receptors, in particular the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α [14], which is involved in the control of inflammation and pain [15]. Cannabinoids are synthesized on demand, and in the central nervous system they are produced mainly post-synaptically to act as retrograde messengers regulating the release of a variety of neurotransmitters at the presynaptic level [16].

The ECS can be exploited as a potential therapeutic option for OA. Indeed, some studies have demonstrated the anti-nociceptive effects of CBR agonists in rodent models of OA [17]. Moreover, the presence of CBRs on chondrocytes [18] and bone [19] suggest a possible role of cannabinoids in cartilage alteration and bone remodeling occurring in OA. Nonetheless, only few studies have investigated the endocannabinoid tone during OA. In humans, AEA and 2-AG were elevated in patients with OA whereas they were not detected in synovial fluids from patients with no joint symptoms. Furthermore, CBR1 and CBR2 were present in the synovia of these patients [6]. A recent study showed that levels of 2-AG were significantly elevated in the synovial fluid of patients who experienced higher postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty and that the levels of PEA correlated with functional disability in OA [20].

Due to the lack of data on dogs, the aim of the present study was to measure ECs and related compounds in the synovial fluid of dogs with OA. In addition, the degree of inflammation and the level of some proinflammatory cytokines were studied as well.

Methods

Ten dogs were enrolled in the study. They were subjected to arthrotomy of the knee joint for monolateral reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Surgery was conducted at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Section of Surgery and Obstetrics of the University of Bari.

Four dogs were mixed breed, two chow chow, 1 labrador, 1 kurzhaar, 1 rottweiler and 1 pomeranian; there were 7 females and 3 males and their age was between 5 and 13 years. Dogs weighted between 8 and 40 Kg. Dogs were considered to be healthy based on physical examination, packed cell volume (PCV) and total solids (TS).

All dogs showed radiological signs of OA when subjected to X-ray examinations of the knee joint while no signs of OA were observed in the contralateral knee joints.

Radiographic examinations were routinely performed and assessed by a team of radiologists from Department of Veterinary Medicine.

The same anaesthesiological protocol was used for all dogs.

After premedication with dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/Kg IM) and methadone (0,2 mg/Kg IM), anesthesia was induced with propofol (to effect EV) and maintained with isofluorane delivered in oxygen.

Aspirates of synovial fluid were obtained from arthritic joints using a 26 gauge needle attached to a 2,5 ml syringe after the exposure of the joint capsule and before its cut.

The synovial fluid of the contralateral knee was collected with the owner’s written consent.

After surgery, all dogs received adequate antibiotic and analgesic therapies.

In all cases, the postoperative course was normal.

Synovial fluids were collected for cytokines quantification, cytology and measurement of ECs.

The Ethical Committee of the Department of Veterinary Medicine – University of Bari approved the procedures (approval n. 6/2016).

Quantification of inflammatory cytokines in synovial fluids

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1beta levels in synovial fluids were measured using two commercially available ELISA kits specific for dog cytokines (Kingfisher Biotech, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Measurement of ECs and related N-acylethanolamines in synovial fluids

The extraction, purification, and quantification of ECs from synovial fluid was performed as previously described for plasma [21]. Briefly, synovial fluids were dounce-homogenized and extracted with chloroform/methanol/Tris–HCl 50 mmol/l pH 7.5 (2:1:1, vol/vol) containing internal standards ([2H]8 AEA 5 pmol; [2H]5 2-AG, [2H]5 PEA and [2H]4 OEA 50 pmol each). The lipid-containing organic phase was dried down, weighed, and pre-purified by open-bed chromatography on silica gel. Fractions were obtained by eluting the column with 99:1, 90:10 and 50:50 (v/v) chloroform/methanol. The 90:10 fraction was used for AEA, 2-AG, PEA and OEA quantification by liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization–mass spectrometry by using a Shimadzu high-performance liquid chromatography apparatus (LC-10ADVP) coupled to a Shimadzu (LCMS-2020) quadrupole mass spectrometry via a Shimadzu atmospheric pressure chemical ionization interface as previously described [22]. The amount of ECs, quantified by isotope dilution with the above mentioned deuterated standards, was expressed as pmol per ml (of synovial fluid volume) or pmol per milligram (of lipid extract weight).

Statistical analysis

All data depicted in Figs. 1 and 2 are reported as arithmetic mean ± SEM. Differences between OA and “healthy” SFs were compared by Student’s t-test. A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Levels of ECs measured in SFs from contralateral (white histograms) and OA (black histograms) joints. Data are expressed as pmol/mg of lipid extract (a) or pmol/ml of SF (b) and are reported as arithmetic mean ± SEM. Differences were compared by the Student’s t test and asterisks indicate significant differences (OA vs healthy joints; p < 0.05)

Figure 2
Fig. 2

IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha levels were measured in SFs from contralateral (white histograms) and OA (black/grey histograms) joints by ELISA. Data are reported as arithmetic mean ± SEM

Results

Cytological examination of the SFs was performed and it showed an increased number of inflammatory cells in SFs from the OA knees. In fact, an increased percentage of neutrophils, ranging from 18% to 38% (average 26,2% ± SD 6,67%), was observed in OA SFs when compared to contralateral joints (all SFs contained <10% neutrophils). In addition, a high percentage of mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes, ranging from 65% to 81% (average 76,6% ± SD 4,43%) was observed in OA SFs only. In one case, the presence of clusters of synovial cells, which appear in the hyperplasia of the synovial membrane, was found.

The concentration of AEA, 2-AG, OEA and PEA were measured in all SFs and results are reported in Fig. 1a and b. There was a significant increase in 2-AG and OEA levels in OA SFs when compared to the contralateral samples (Fig. 1a).

The results of the levels of two inflammatory cytokines are reported in Fig. 2. Although there was an increased level of TNF-alpha in SFs from OA joints, it was not significantly different from the level observed in the SFs from contralateral knees (p > 0.05). Similar levels of IL-1 beta were observed in synovial fluids from OA versus contralateral joints (p > 0.05).

Discussion

In the present study, the identification and quantification of ECs (and related acylethanolamides) in SFs from dogs with OA of the knee is reported.

In particular, AEA, 2-AG, OEA and PEA were all measurable in the SFs from OA knees and in the SFs from contralateral joints and a significant increase of OEA and 2-AG levels was noted in SFs from OA knees when compared to those from contralateral joints. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing detectable levels of ECs, and related compounds, in SFs from OA and contralateral joints of dogs.

The detection of PEA, although at similar levels in OA and “healthy” SFs, is of particular interest because of its known anti-inflammatory activity [23] via nuclear peroxisome proliferator activating receptor-α (PPAR-α) activation and EC entourage effects. In addition, these effects can also be exerted by OEA, often with higher potency [14].

Endocannabinoids are synthesized on demand by several cell types, including immune cells, such as macrophages and T cells, which are present in human OA joints [24].

Endocannabinoids are rapidly produced “on-demand” from their cellular precursors. Once synthesized, they are rapidly released in the extracellular space and bind receptors present either on the same cells (the ones who have produced them) or on neighbour cells.

Since their biological activity is very rapid, specific and occurs in a limited anatomical space, it is very unlikely their diffusion in the bloodstream. Therefore the presence in the contralateral joint is unlikely due to a simple passive diffusion from other sites (including the systemic source).

Endothelial cells can also synthesize ECs [25, 26] and thus contribute to their accumulation. Vascular elements are important in the progression of the DJD since neovascularization is one of the early changes in the synovium and it is thought to be linked to bone and cartilage destruction [27].

The main elements of the EC signaling system, including CBR1 and CBR2 mRNA and proteins, were found in synovial biopsies from patients with advanced osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [6]. Both AEA and 2-AG were detected in the SF of these patients, but not in healthy volunteers. This latter finding is different from the data reported here. Some animals included in the study were aged with probable bilateral OA of the knee and with no clinical sign of lameness in one knee. Therefore, an early and/or undiagnosed arthritic change in the contralateral knee considered “healthy”, cannot be ruled out, nor it can be excluded that the altered load could induce inflammation in the contralateral non-arthritic knee. This could explain the presence of AEA, 2-AG, OEA and PEA also in the clinical healthy contralateral joints.

Indeed, the presence of similar levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in SFs from both OA and contralateral joints could have the same explanation. Levels of cytokines in OA are very variable due to the variable degree of synovial hypertrophy, synovial effusions, subchondral bone marrow oedema and presence of inflammatory cells in the sub-lining tissues [28]. The inflammatory component is therefore variable. It must be underlined that the activation of CBR2 is associated with decreases in immune cell function, including attenuated cytokine release [29, 30].

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the presence of AEA, 2-AG, OEA and PEA in the SF of dogs with OA.

We have found these same mediators in the SF obtained from contralateral knees. Our data open the avenue to future studies involving a higher number of dogs and aimed at defining the role played by these compounds in OA of the dogs.

Both plant-derived and synthetic agonists of CBRs represent an emerging and innovative pharmacological tool for the treatment of OA. Pharmacological studies have showed the anti-nociceptive effects of these compounds in rodent models of this pathology and compelling evidence suggests an active role of the ECS in the pathophysiology of this disease.

The potential effect of cannabinoids in slowing OA disease progression in veterinary clinical practice still remains to be explored. Further studies are therefore needed to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabinoids as an innovative treatment in veterinary medicine.

Abbreviations

2-AG: 

2-arachidonyl glycerol

AEA: 

N- arachidonoylethanolamide, anandamide

CBR: 

Cannabinoid receptor

DJD: 

Degenerative joint disease

EC: 

Endocannabinoid

ECS: 

Endocannabinoid system

IL: 

Interleukin

OA: 

Osteoarthritis

OEA: 

Oleoylethanolamide

PCV: 

Packed cell volume

PEA: 

Palmitoyl ethanolamihave

SF: 

Synovial fluid

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

TS: 

Total solids

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

No specific funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available to avoid breaching owner confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

CV, DC and MM contributed equally to this work. CV and DC designed and performed the study, recruited patients and drafted the manuscript. MM performed the cytokine analysis, performed the statistics and contributed to writing and revising the manuscript. FP, RV and VDM performed the endocannabinoids analysis, analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript. DF was involved in postoperative course of patients and reviewed the manuscript. ADB supervised the research project from the clinical point of view, performed the surgery and reviewed the paper. All authors critically read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval

The Ethical Committee of the Department of Veterinary Medicine – University of Bari approved the procedures (approval n. 6/2016) which was in accordance with local, national and European animal use guidelines. The owners signed an informed consent to collect the synovial fluid also from the contralateral healthy knee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
(2)
Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
(3)
Endocannabinoid Research Group (ERG), Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Pozzuoli, Italy

References

  1. La Porta C, Bura SA, Negrete R, Maldonado R. Involvement of the endocannabinoid system in osteoarthritis pain. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39:485–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Haseeb A, Haqqi TM. Immunopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Clin Immunol. 2013;146:185–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN. Role of cytokines in rheumatoid arthtritis. Ann Rev Immunol. 1996;14:397–440.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sutton S, Clutterbuck A, Harris P, Gent T, Freeman S, Foster N, Barrett-Jolley R, Mobasheri A. The contribution of the synovium, synovial derived inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Vet J. 2009;179:10–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston SA. Ostheoarthritis, joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology. Vet Cli North Am Small Anim Pract. 1997;27:699–723.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Richardson D, Pearson RG, Kurian N, Latif ML, Garle MJ, Barrett DA, Kendall DA, Scammell BE, Reeve AJ, Chapman V. Characterisation of the cannabinoid receptor system in synovial tissue and fluid in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mc Partland JM, Duncan M, Di Marzo V, Pertwee RG. Are cannabidiol and Δ9 –tetrahydrocannabivarin negative modulators of the endocannabinoid sustem? A systemic review. Brit J Pharmacol. 2015;172:737–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mackie K. Cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;46:101–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmes SJR, Jhaveri MD, Smart D, Kendall DA, Chapman V. Activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors attenuates the induction and maintenance of inflammatory pain in rat. Pain. 2005;118:327–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith FL, Fujimori K, Lowe J, Welch SP. Characterization of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and anandamide antinociception in nonarthritic and arthritic rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998;60:183–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mc Partland JM, Guy GW, Di Marzo V. Care and feeding of the endocannabinoid system: a systematic review of potential clinical interventions that upregulate the endocannabinoid system. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–21.Google Scholar
  12. Lambert DM, Di Marzo V. The palmitoylethanolamide and oleamide enigmas: are those two fatty acid amides cannabimimetic? Curr Med Chem. 1999;6:757–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mechoulam R, Fride E, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoids. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;359:1–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Sullivan SE. Cannabinoids go nuclear: evidence for activation of peroxisome proliferator-activate receptors. Brit J Pharmacol. 2007;152:576–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Capasso R, Hoareau L, Monteleone P, Izzo AA, Di Marzo V. Role and regulation of acylethanolamides in energy balance: focus on adipocytes and β-cells. Brit J Pharmacol. 2007;152:676–90.Google Scholar
  16. Wilson RI, Nicoll RA. Endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. Science. 2002;296:678–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuelert N, McDougall JJ. Cannabinoid-mediated antinociception is enhanced in rat osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:145–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mbvundula EC, Bunning RA, Rainsford KD. Arthritis and cannabinoids: HU-210 and Win-55,212-2 prevent IL-1alpha-induced matrix degradation in bovine articular chondrocytes in-vitro. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006;58:351–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Idris AI, Ralston SH. Role of cannabinoids in regulation of bone remodeling. Front Endocrinol. 2012;3:136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Azim S, Nicholson J, Rebecchi M, Galbavy W, Feng T, Reinsel R, Volkow ND, Benveniste H, Kaczocha M, et al. Endocannabinoids and acute pain following total knee arthroplasty. Pain. 2015;156:341–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Berge K, Piscitelli F, Hoem N, Silvestri C, Meyer I, Banni S, Di Marzo V. Chronic treatment with krill powder reduces plasma triglyceride and anandamide levels in mildly obese man. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Matias I, Petrosino S, Racioppi A, Capasso R, Izzo AA, Di Marzo V. Dysregulation of peripheral endocannabinoid levels in hyperglycemia and obesity: effect of high fat diets. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;286:66–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambert DM, Vsndevoorde S, Jonsson KO, Fowler CJ. The palmitoylethanolamide family: a new class of anti-inflammatory agents? Curr Med Chem. 2002;9:663–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Haynes MK, Hume EL, Smith JB. Phenotypic characterization of inflammatory cells from osteoarthritic synovium and synovial fluids. Clin Immunol. 2002;105:315–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Deutsch DG, Goligorsky MS, Schmid PC, Krebsbach RJ, Schmid HH, Das SK, Dey SK, Arreaza G, Thorup C, Stefano G, Moore LC. Production and physiological actions of anandamide in the vasculature of the rat kidney. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1538–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sugiura T, Kodaka T, Nakane S, Kishimoto S, Kondo S, Waku K. Detection of an endogenous cannabimimetic molecule, 2-Arachidonoylglycerol, and cannabinoid CB1receptor mRNAin human vascular cells: is 2-Arachidonoylglycerol a possible vasomodulator? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;243:838–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Maruotti N, Cantatore FP, Crivellato E, Vacca A, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Histol Histopathol. 2006;21:557–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaible HG, Richter F, Ebersberger A, Boettger MK, Vanegas H, Natura G, Vazquez E, von Banchet Segond G. Joint pain. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196:153–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Croxford JL, Yamamura T. Cannabinoids and the immune system: potential for the treatment of inflammatory disease? J Neuroimmunol. 2005;166:3–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein TW. Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:400–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement