Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Veterinary Research

Open Access

Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in farm-reared ostriches (Struthio camelus) in China

BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:301

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1221-2

Received: 28 June 2016

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 11 October 2017

Abstract

Background

The parasites Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) and Neospora caninum (N. caninum) are globally distributed; they infect warm-blooded animals, including many avian species. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of these parasites in ostriches from central China. In total, 402 ostrich (Struthio camelus) samples (293 hearts, 77 brains, and 32 serum) from slaughterhouses of the Henan Province and Hebei Province were collected. The heart juice (n = 283) and serum samples (n = 32) were tested for antibodies to T. gondii using the modified agglutination test (MAT). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and the polymerase chain reaction were used to examine the cysts and DNA of T. gondii and N. caninum parasites, respectively.

Results

Antibodies to T. gondii were detected in 6.4% (20/315) (cut-off, 25). No cysts or DNA of T. gondii or N. caninum were observed in any of the 293 hearts and 77 brains.

Conclusion

The results showed a low prevalence of T. gondii antibody in ostriches, compared to that in the other animals. N. caninum occurs at low to negligible frequencies in ostriches from China. This is the first report on screening ostriches in China for T. gondii antibodies.

Keywords

AntibodyCystsDNAEpidemiologyModified agglutination test

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate cyst-forming parasite known to infect many species of warm-blooded animals, including ostrich [1, 2]. Infection with T. gondii is usually asymptomatic, but it can cause severe illness in both humans and animals with weakened immune systems, and in the case of pregnancy [3]. Neospora caninum is a parasite similar to T. gondii in many respects as it causes abortion in cattle and paralysis in dogs [4, 5].

The breeding of ostriches for eggs, feathers, skin and meat is growing in China and its meat, in particular, is low in fat and highly palatable. The prevalence of T. gondii in free-range chickens is a good indicator of the presence of oocysts in the environment [6], and ostrich is much like free-range chickens that feed directly from the ground. It was speculated that T. gondii and N. caninum infection in ostriches may assess the presence of oocysts in the local soil and environment. Furthermore, the consumption of undercooked ostrich meat containing T. gondii cysts might be a source of infection to consumers. Although the prevalence of T. gondii in ostriches has been reported in various countries [713], no research studies on T. gondii infection in ostriches from China have been conducted to date. Recently, the first report of isolation of T. gondii from ostriches was published [2]. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of T. gondii and N. caninum in farm-raised ostriches from China and attempt to isolate T. gondii.

Methods

Sample collection

A total of 402 ostrich (Struthio camelus) samples (283 fresh hearts, 77 fresh brains, 32 fresh sera, and 10 formalin-fixed hearts) from slaughterhouses in two provinces (Henan Province: 165 hearts, 77 brains, 32 sera and 10 formalin-fixed hearts samples; Hebei Province: 118 hearts) were collected between 2012 and 2015 (Table 1). All ostriches was above 10 months old, however the sex was unknown. The provinces of Henan (31.38° to 36.37°N and 110.35° to 116.65°E) and Hebei (36.08° to 42.67° N and 113.45° to 119.83°E) are located in central China. Unfrozen and fresh samples were transported to the Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Henan Agricultural University in cooler boxes. The ostriches were bred in paddocks and fed from the ground with greens and nutritious additives. Heart juice from 283 hearts was collected and centrifuged (1000 g, 5 min) and then assayed for antibodies against T. gondii. A total of 315 samples (283 heart juice and 32 sera) were screened for T. gondii antibodies. The samples were kept in a refrigerator with a temperature range of 2 °C to 4 °C until analysis (within 1 week).
Table 1

Samples from Ostriches raised on farms in Henan Province and Hebei Province (n = 402)

Location

Collection time

Samples No.

Positive No. in different titers

Total positive No. and rate (%)

Isolation obtained by mice from samplesa

25

50

100

200

Hebei Province

2015 Summer/fall

118 hearts

0

0

0

0

0

Henan Province

2015 Springb

31 hearts

1

0

0

0

1/31 (3.2%)

0/1

2015 Fallb

134 hearts

66 brains

32 sera

13

6

10

6

8

6

0

19/166 (11.5%)

0/7

2012–2014

10 heartsc 11 brainsc

   

0

Total

2012–2015

293 hearts 77 brains 32 sera

20

16

14

0

20/315 (6.4%)

0/8

aNumber of antibody-positive groups /Number of inoculated-groups

b P-value >0.05 by two-tailed chi-square tests for season factor in Henan Province

cformalin fixed samples

Screening of ostriches body fluids for T. gondii antibodies

Using the modified agglutination test [14] at a dilution of 1:25, 1:50, 1:100 and 1:200, 315 body fluid samples (283 heart juice and 32 sera) were screened for T. gondii antibodies. T. gondii-positive serum from mice was used as a reference; negative serum and blank were performed in each plate. Whole formalin-treated T. gondii tachyzoite antigen was obtained from the Kerafast Company (Boston, MA, USA. Catalog No. EH2002). Serum dilution of 1:25 is effective for assessing the T. gondii antibody, which has been reported in ostriches and other animals [7, 8].

Histopathological examination of ostrich heart and brain tissues for T. gondii and N. caninum

A total of 370 ostrich tissue samples (293 hearts and 77 brains) were respectively cut into three pieces (1.0 × 1.0 × 0.3 cm), embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. These tissue sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to verify suspected samples by rabbit polyclonal T. gondii antibody and mouse polyclonal N. caninum antibody. T. gondii-positive tissues or N. caninum-positive tissues from mice were used as reference; negative serum and blank were performed in each batch. The sections were examined with an Olympus CX21 optical microscope to search for cysts and determine the infection of T. gondii or N. caninum.

Isolation of viable T. gondii from ostrich hearts by bioassay in mice

Ostrich hearts that tested positive for T. gondii antibodies were bioassayed in mice individually (n = 8); sheep hearts containing T. gondii cysts were used as controls. Myocardia (50 g) from each heart were homogenized, digested in pepsin, and inoculated subcutaneously into 5 outbred Kunming mice, which were given water supplemented with dexamethasone phosphate (10 μg/ml) 3 days before inoculation [3]. The remaining pepsin-digested myocardial samples were stored in 1.5 mL cryotubes at −20 °C until further analysis. Clinical signs in these mice were observed daily. The mice were bled and sacrificed at 64 days post inoculation. Then the sera were diluted 1:25 and 1:200 to test for T. gondii antibodies; in addition, squash preparations of the brain were microscopically examined for T. gondii cysts. The mouse brains were then inoculated into new groups of mice.

PCR identification of T. gondii and N. caninum in ostrich heart and brain tissues

DNA was extracted from all tissue samples (293 hearts, 77 brains, and 8 pepsin -digested sediments of the myocardium) using a commercial DNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotec Company, Beijing, China, DP304). PCR was used to detect the DNA of T. gondii (TOX5/TOX8) in amplified fragments of 450 bp [15] and N. caninum (NP6/NP21) in fragments of 337 bp [16]. The DNA isolated from T. gondii (CT1 strain) or N. caninum (NC1 strain) was used as a reference for PCR.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data were analyzed by using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

T. gondii antibody testing

T. gondii antibodies have been previously detected in the meat juice of pig, sheep, and cattle [17, 18]. In the present study, by using MAT, T. gondii antibodies were found in 6.4% (20/315) of the ostriches, with titers of 25 in 20, titers of 50 in 16, titers of 100 in 14 (8 hearts and 6 sera), and none showed a titer >200. The seroepidemiology of T. gondii was 10.2% (20/197: 165 hearts, 32 sera) in Henan Province. None of the samples from Hebei Province (118 hearts) were positive (Table 1). Hebei is located north of Henan, drier and colder. The climate of Hebei Province may contribute to the negative toxoplasmosis results involving ostriches from the region. In Henan Province, 11.5% (19/166) of the ostrich samples that were collected in the fall were seropositive for T. gondii, whereas 3.2% (1/31) of those collected in the spring were seropositive. The risk of T. gondii infection in the fall was thus higher compared to that in the spring, with an odds ratio of 3.878 (95% CI, 0.4995–30.10). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). This finding suggests that ostriches from Henan Province had been in contact with T. gondii oocysts from cats or from soil, water, or food. Ostriches feed from the ground, are raised much like free-range chickens and have a relatively free activity field. In Henan Province, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in free-range chickens was 18.9% (132/700) [19]; in cats, it was 52.3% (102/195) and 51.6% (16/31) [20, 21]; 12.7% (99/779) and 29.3% (83/283) in sheep [22, 23], 23.7% (627/2642) in pig [24]. Compared with these reports, seroprevalence of T. gondii was lower among farm-reared ostriches (10.2%, 20/197) in the same location. This result is consistent with other reports. A low prevalence of T. gondii antibodies in ostriches has been reported in other countries. The seroprevalence of T. gondii was about 74% to 80% among backyard chickens in Brazil [25, 26], but lower among ostriches (about 11% to 17%) [2, 9, 10] (Table 2). A summary of the prevalence of T. gondii in ostriches in various countries is shown in Table 2. Prevalence varies from 1% to 48%, depending on the country. In conclusion, this is the first report to show the prevalence of T. gondii in ostriches from China.
Table 2

Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in ostriches

Country

No. of samples received

No. of seropositive (%)

Serologic test (cut-off titer)

References

Zimbabwe

50

24 (48%)

MAT (25)

[8]

Canada

973

28 (3%)

MAT (25)

[7]

Brazil

46

8 (17%)

MAT (16)

[9]

195

28 (14%)

MAT (16)

[10]

344

38 (11%)

MAT (8)

[2]

Spain

117

1 (1%)

MAT (25)

[11]

Egypt

120

15 (13%)

MAT (25)

[12]

Iran

28

6 (21%)

ELISA

[13]

China

315

20 (6%)

MAT (25)

This study

T. gondii isolation, T. gondii and N. caninum morphological and molecular assays

Viable T. gondii had been isolated from ostrich brains, thereby serving as direct evidence that ostriches are intermediate hosts [2]. Isolation of T. gondii from the chicken heart or brain by bioassay in mice has been shown to be effective [3, 27]. A previous study has shown that the density of T. gondii cysts in the heart is higher than that in muscle or brain of chickens [27]. Eight ostrich hearts were bioassayed in immunosuppressed Kunming mice in an effort to isolate T. gondii, but this was unsuccessful. Furthermore, H&E or IHC staining did not detect any tissue cysts of T. gondii or N. caninum, and no positive DNA of T. gondii or N. caninum was detected by PCR in a total of 370 ostrich tissue samples and 8 pepsin-digested liquids from myocardia. These results may be explained by (1) the relative low density of T. gondii cysts in ostriches from China or (2) false positive on the MAT. Antigen from whole formalin-treated tachyzoites was used in the MAT. The MAT is highly sensitive and has been extensively used to test T. gondii antibodies in many animals and birds, including ostriches. The accuracy of the MAT has been validated in ostriches because 14/38 (36.8%) isolation has been achieved [2]. However, we can not rule out the possibility that T. gondii antigen cross-reacts with other parasites (Hammondia hammondi) [28].

Some birds (chickens, pigeons, sparrows) have been shown to be intermediate hosts for N. caninum [29]. However, a recent literature search has found no study on N. caninum in ostriches. Ostriches have not been proven to be intermediate hosts for N. caninum. An examination of tissue sections was the most straightforward way of observing the parasites and lesions by light microscopy. Mineo found that no serological positivity of N. caninum was observed in 294 samples of serum. However, N. caninum cysts were found in Psittaciformes muscle by tissue section [30]. PCR is a sensitive method for detecting parasites. The DNA of N. caninum in the heart and brain of many animals has detected by PCR, particularly in the brains [31]. The absence of N. caninum from these ostrich samples suggests that this parasite occurs at low to negligible frequencies in ostriches from China. Further investigations using samples from different areas may facilitate in better understanding the process of neosporosis in ostriches.

Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate that T. gondii has a lower prevalence in ostriches compared to other animals, the cause of this difference is unknown. However, consumers are precautions of eating raw or undercooked ostrich meat to avoid being infected with T. gondii. N. caninum occurs at low to negligible frequencies in ostriches from China. The establishment of differences in prevalence rates between ostrich and other birds may assist in the design of preventive and control measures against toxoplasmosis.

Abbreviations

H&E: 

Hematoxylin and eosin staining

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

MAT: 

Modified agglutination test

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank J. P. Dubey (US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA) and J. Liu (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China) for providing positive serum, primary antibody, positive tissues, and DNA of T. gondii or N. caninum.

Funding

The China Henan Science and Technology Open and Cooperation Project (Grant No. 152106000056) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M600577) supported this study.

Availability of data and materials

The data, materials, and protocols associated with this report may be shared by the readers without undue qualifications.

Authors’ contributions

YJF performed the laboratory tests, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. YYL, YHW participated in sample collection and laboratory testing. LXZ helped in the writing of the manuscript. YRY designed the study protocol, analyzed the results and helped in the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval

Ethical treatment of animals used in this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Use Committee of Henan Agricultural University (China). The protocol was approved by the Beijing Association for Science and Technology (SYXK [Beijing] 2007–0023).

Consent for publication

All authors consent for publication of this report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. None of the authors of this report have financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence its content.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University
(2)
Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention of Henan Province

References

  1. Dubey JP. A review of toxoplasmosis in wild birds. Vet Parasitol. 2002;106(2):121–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. da Silva RC, Langoni H. Risk factors and molecular typing of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from ostriches (Struthio camelus) from a Brazilian slaughterhouse. Vet Parasitol. 2016;225:73–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Dubey JP. Neosporosis in dogs. Commonw Agric Bur Rev. 2013;8:1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Lorenzi H, Khan A, Behnke MS, Namasivayam S, Swapna LS, Hadjithomas M, Karamycheva S, Pinney D, Brunk BP, Ajioka JW, Ajzenberg D, Boothroyd JC, Boyle JP, Dardé ML, Diaz-Miranda MA, Dubey JP, Fritz HM, Gennari SM, Gregory BD, Kim K, Saeij JP, Su C, White MW, Zhu XQ, Howe DK, Rosenthal BM, Grigg ME, Parkinson J, Liu L, Kissinger JC, Roos DS, Sibley LD. Local admixture of amplified and diversified secreted pathogenesis determinants shapes mosaic Toxoplasma gondii genomes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10147.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010;57(1):60–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubey JP, Scandrett WB, OCH K, Gajadhar AA. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in ostriches (Struthio camelus). J Parasitol. 2000;86(3):623–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hove T, Mukaratirwa S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in farm-reared ostriches and wild game species from Zimbabwe. Acta Trop. 2005;94(1):49–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Almeida AB, Krindges MM, de Barros LD, Garcia JL, Camillo G, Vogel FSF, Araujo DN, Stefani LM, da Silva AS. Occurrence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in rheas (Rhea americana) and ostriches (Struthio camelus) from farms of different Brazilian regions. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2013;22(3):437–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Contente APA, Domingues PF, da Silva RC. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in ostriches (Struthio camelus) from commercial breeding facilities in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci. 2009;46(3):175–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Martínez-Díaz RA, Simmons B, Ponee-Gordo F. Serologic screening to detect Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in farmed ostriches (Struthio camelus) in Spain. Braz J Vet Parasitol. 2002;62(3–4):69–71.Google Scholar
  12. El-Madawy SR, Metawea FY. Serological assays and PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in an ostrich farm at Ismailia Provine. Egypt IOSR J Agr Vet Sci. 2013;2(3):56–60.Google Scholar
  13. Rahimi E, Yazdanpour S, Dehkordi FS. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in various poultry meat samples using enzyme linked immuno sorbent assay and its confirmation by polymerase chain reaction. J Pure Appl Microbio. 2014;8(1):421–7.Google Scholar
  14. Dubey JP, Desmonts G. Serological responses of equids fed Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Equine Vet J. 1987;19(4):337–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Su C, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii in molecuar detection of foodborne pathogens. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Liddell S, Jenkins MC, Dubey JP. A competitive PCR assay for quantitative detection of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol. 1999;29(10):1583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Račka K, Bártová E, Budíková M, Vodrážka P. Survey of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in meat juice of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in several districts of the Czech Republic. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(2):231–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berger-Schoch AE, Bernet D, Doherr MG, Gottstein B, Frey CF. Toxoplasma gondii in Switzerland: a serosurvey based on meat juice analysis of slaughtered pigs, wild boar, sheep and cattle. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58(7):472–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng YJ, Lu YY, Wang YH, Liu J, Zhang LX, Yang YR. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in free-range chickens in Henan Province of China. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8290536.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang HY, Pei SL, Hao ZF, Zhou M. Investigation on epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats in Zhengzhou City. J Henan Agr Sci. 2012;41(11):153–4. In ChineseGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang YR, Ying YQ, Verma SK, Cassinelli ABM, Kwok OCH, Liang HD, Pradhan AK, Zhu XQ, Su CL, Dubey JP. Isolation and genetic characterization of viable Toxoplasma gondii from tissues and feces of cats from the central region of China. Vet Parasitol. 2015;211(3–4):283–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang N, Wang S, Wang D, Li CY, Zhang ZC, Yao ZJ, Li TT, Xie Q, Liu SG, Zhang HZ. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection and risk factors in domestic sheep in Henan Province, central China. Parasite. 2016;23:53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang YR, Feng YJ, Yao QX, Wang YH, Lu YY, Liang HD, Zhu XQ, Zhang LX. Seroprevalence, isolation, genotyping, and pathogenicity of Toxoplasma gondii strains from sheep in China. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:136.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Wen QN, Guo YH, Yang JF, Shen H, Du YC. Investigation on epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in pig from Henan Province. Chin J Vet Med. 2015;51(4):44–5. In ChineseGoogle Scholar
  25. Costa DGC, Marvulo MFV, Silva JSA, Santana SC, Magalhães FJR, Lima Filho CDF, Ribeiro VO, Alves LC, Mota RA, Dubey JP, Silva JCR. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic and wild animals from the Fernando de Noronha. Brazil J Parasitol. 2012;98(3):679–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Camillo G, Cadore GC, Ferreira MST, Braünig P, Maciel JF, Pivoto FL, Sangioni LA, Vogel FSF. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibodies in backyard chickens in Rio Grande do Sul. Brazil Braz J Poultry Sci. 2015;17(2):263–5.Google Scholar
  27. Dubey JP, Lehmann T, Lautner F, Kwok OCH, Gamble HR. Toxoplasmosis in sentinel chickens (Gallus domesticus) in New England farms: seroconversion, distribution of tissue cysts in brain, heart, and skeletal muscle by bioassay in mice and cats. Vet Parasitol. 2015;214(1–2):55–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Munday BL, Dubey JP. Serological cross-reactivity between Hammondia hammondi and Toxoplasma gondii in experimentally inoculated sheep. Aust Vet J. 1986;63:344–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Donahoe SL, Lindsay SA, Krockenberger M, Phalen D, Šlapeta J. A review of neosporosis and pathologic findings of Neospora caninum infection in wildlife. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015;4(2):216–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mineo TWP, Carrasco AOT, Raso TF, Werthera K, Pintoa AA, Machado RZ. Survey for natural Neospora caninum infection in wild and captive birds. Vet Parasitol. 2011;182(2–4):352–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Darwich L, Cabezon O, Echeverria I, Pabón M, Marco I, Molina-López R, Alarcia-Alejos O, López-Gatius F, Lavín S, Almería S. Presence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum DNA in the brain of wild birds. Vet Parasitol. 2012;183(3–4):377–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement