Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

Research article
Open Access

Effects of Trilostane on urinary Catecholamines and their metabolites in dogs with Hypercortisolism

BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201713:279

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1187-0

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 20 January 2017

Accepted: 10 August 2017

Published: 4 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Glucocorticoids influence the synthesis and metabolism of catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) and metanephrines (metanephrine and normetanephrine). The aim of this study was to measure urinary catecholamines and metanephrines in dogs with hypercortisolism before and during trilostane therapy.

Urine samples were collected during initial work up and during therapy with trilostane in 14 dogs with hypercortisolism and in 25 healthy dogs. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine and normetanephrine were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography and expressed as ratios to urinary creatinine concentration.

Results

Untreated dogs with hypercortisolism had significantly higher epinephrine, norepinephrine, and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios compared to healthy dogs. During trilostane therapy, urinary catecholamines and their metabolites did not decrease significantly. However, dogs with low post-ACTH cortisol concentrations during trilostane therapy had less increased epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios compared to healthy dogs. There was no correlation of urinary catecholamines and their metabolites with baseline or post-ACTH cortisol or endogenous ACTH concentrations during trilostane therapy.

Conclusion

Influences between steroid hormones and catecholamines seem to occur, as dogs with hypercortisolism have significantly higher urinary epinephrine, norepinephrine, and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios. Once-daily trilostane therapy does not lead to a significant decrease in catecholamines and their metabolites. Trilostane-treated dogs still have increased urinary epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios during trilostane therapy.

Keywords

ACTHMetanephrinesPheochromocytomaTrilostane therapyCanine

Background

Catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine) are produced by the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla and the postganglionic fibers of the sympathetic nervous system. They are synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine, which is converted to L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), next to dopamine and finally to norepinephrine [1]. In most sympathetic postganglionic neurons, norepinephrine is the final product. In the cells of the adrenal medulla, norepinephrine is further converted into epinephrine [1]. After release into the plasma, catecholamines are quickly metabolized. Metabolism takes place mainly in the adrenal gland cells and only a small proportion in the liver and kidneys and includes the conversion of epinephrine to metanephrine and norepinephrine to normetanephrine [2]. While catecholamines are released intermittently, metanephrines (metanephrine and normetanephrine) are constantly released into the circulation and excreted in the urine [2]. This constant liberation explains why measurement of urinary or plasma metanephrines has a higher accuracy to diagnose pheochromocytoma than the measurement of catecholamines [2].

The adrenal medulla comprises about one-fourth of the adrenal mass. The rest of the adrenal mass consists of the adrenal cortex containing steroid-producing adrenocortical cells. For a long time, the two cell populations within the adrenal gland were considered as two independent endocrine systems. However, nowadays, interactions between steroid hormones and catecholamines are well known. Glucocorticoids have been shown to influence several enzymes involved in catecholamine synthesis and metabolism: first, tyrosine hydroxylase, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in catecholamine biosynthesis; second, PNMT (Phenylethanolamin-N-Methyltransferase), which converts norepinephrine to epinephrine; and third, dopamine β-hydroxylase, which hydroxylates dopamine to norepinephrine [3–7]. In vitro, glucocorticoids have been shown to increase the release of catecholamines from canine adrenal glands [8]. Therefore, it was not surprising that dogs with hypercortisolism (HC) were found to have increased concentrations of urinary epinephrine-, norepinephrine- and normetanephrine-to-creatinine ratios compared to healthy dogs [9]. However, the evolution of urinary catecholamines and metanephrines concentrations during the therapy of canine HC is unknown. Hypercortisolism is an important differential diagnosis in dogs with pheochromocytomas, as clinical signs of both diseases overlap and pheochromocytomas cannot be distinguished ultrasonographically from tumors of the adrenal cortex.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate urine concentrations of catecholamines and metanephrines in dogs with HC before and during therapy with trilostane. We hypothesized that successful therapy of HC with trilostane would lead to a significant decrease in urinary epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios due to the cortisol-lowering effect of trilostane.

Methods

Animals

Fourteen dogs with naturally occurring hypercortisolism (HC) were prospectively enrolled. Results of catecholamines and metanephrines:creatinine ratios before trilostane therapy of five dogs had been previously reported as part of a former study [10]. Nine dogs were male (4 castrated) and five dogs female (4 spayed). Breeds included Dachshund (1), Giant Schnauzer (1), Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever (1), Parson Jack Russell Terrier (1), Petit Bleu de Gascogne (1), Tibetan Terrier (1), Yorkshire Terrier (1), and 7 mixed-breed dogs. Age ranged between 6 and 14 years (median 8.5; standard error of mean (SEM): 0.6) and body weight between 7 and 58 kg (median 18.8; SEM: 3.7). Criteria for inclusion were the presence of clinical signs consistent with HC (e.g. polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, panting, skin signs, weakness, abdominal enlargement), a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDS test) or ACTH stimulation test results compatible with HC and the owner’s agreement to treat and regularly re-evaluate the dog over at least a 6-month period [9, 11]. Pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism (PDH) was diagnosed in all dogs by means of a normal or increased concentration of endogenous ACTH, bilateral symmetrical appearance of the adrenal gland determined by ultrasonography and/or demonstration of pituitary enlargement by computed tomography.

Twenty-five client-owned dogs were enrolled as controls. These dogs had been part of previous studies [9, 10, 12]. Eleven dogs were male (6 castrated) and 14 female (12 spayed), and breeds included Australian Shepherd (1), Berger Blanc Suisse (1), Bernese Mountain Dogs (2), Border Collie (1), Golden Retriever (2), Gordon Setters (2), Labrador Retriever (2), Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever (1), Rhodesian Ridgeback (1), Siberian Huskies (2), Standard Poodle (1), Tervueren (1), and eight mixed-breed dogs. Age ranged between 2 and 15 years (median 7; SEM: 0.6) and body weight between 10.4 and 59.2 kg (median 26; SEM: 2.3). The dogs were considered as healthy, based on detailed information provided by their owners and the results of a physical examination, CBC, serum biochemistry profile, and urinalysis. The inclusion of the dogs in the study was approved by the veterinary office of the canton of Zurich and was in accordance with the guidelines and directives established by the Animal Welfare Act of Switzerland (TVB 199/2004).

Sample collecting and processing

All urine samples (healthy and sick dogs) used for analysis of catecholamines, metanephrines and creatinine were taken in hospital, either by free catch or by cystocentesis. In dogs with HC the first sample was taken in the morning during the initial work up for HC and once during trilostane therapy (at least 6 months after start of trilostane therapy). During trilostane therapy the urine was collected 2-3 h after the dose of trilostane in the morning. Urine collection and processing was done as reported previously [9, 12, 13]. Briefly, 10 ml of urine were placed in a silicone-coated tube containing 270-280 μL of 20% hydrochloric acid (HCl). Urinary pH was measured using pH indicator strips (range of pH 1 – 6) and HCl was added to achieve a pH ≤ 2 if needed. Samples were light protected and stored at −20 °C until analysis.

Measurement of Catecholamines and Metanephrines

Urine samples were analysed at the Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland as previously described [9, 12, 13]. Urinary epinephrine, norepinephrine, total metanephrine and total normetanephrine were quantified by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography with amperometric detection as separate compounds. The terms “catecholamines” or “metanephrines” (plural form) includes epinephrine and norepinephrine or normetanephrine and metanephrine, respectively. The results were expressed as a ratio to urinary creatinine concentrations and will be listed in the following sections as: norepinephrine:creatinine, epinephrine:creatinine, normetanephrine:creatinine and metanephrine:creatinine.

Measurement of cortisol and endogenous ACTH

For the ACTH stimulation test, blood samples were taken before, and 60 min after, intravenous injection of 5 μg/kg synthetic tetracosactide (Synacthen®, Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland). Cortisol concentrations were measured by chemiluminescence assay (DPC Immulite® 1000, Siemens Schweiz AG, Zurich, Switzerland). The intra-assay coefficients of variation were 10% and 6.3% at cortisol levels of 74.5 and 521 nmol/L, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 5.5 nmol/L. Endogenous ACTH before ACTH stimulation was determined by a chemiluminescence assay (DPC Immulite® 1000, Siemens Schweiz AG, Zurich, Switzerland) previously validated for dogs [14, 15]. Blood was collected into chilled EDTA-coated tubes placed on ice and centrifuged at 4 °C. Cortisol and endogenous ACTH measurements were performed in house twice a week; plasma was stored either at −20 °C (cortisol) or at −80 °C (ACTH) until assayed.

Experimental design

The prospective study was performed between May 2006 and October 2014 at our hospital. The initial dose of trilostane for dogs with HC was 1-2 mg/kg q 24 h (in the morning). ACTH stimulation tests were performed prior to trilostane treatment (except for 1 dog) and at regular intervals thereafter (2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks). The test was performed 2-3 h after the daily dose of trilostane according to the previously described treatment protocol [16]. The treatment goal was to achieve a post-ACTH cortisol concentration of 41-138 nmol/L. The dose of trilostane was adjusted in dogs with post-ACTH serum cortisol >138 nmol/L or <41 nmol/L and clinical signs suggestive of hypercortisolism (polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia) or hypocortisolism (reduced appetite, vomiting or nausea, soft feces), respectively.

Urine samples for determination of catecholamines and metanephrines were collected at diagnosis of HC and at least 6 months after starting trilostane therapy (ensuring that all dogs were clinically controlled for at least 2 months). At the re-evaluation during trilostane therapy, dogs had to be clinically controlled (polyuria, polydipsia and panting decreased, weakness and agility increased), owners had to be satisfied with the treatment outcome and post-ACTH cortisol concentrations had to be <138 nmol/L. Median time for urinary sample collection during trilostane therapy was 11 months (range: 6-40 months) after diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with non-parametric statistical methods (GraphPad Prism6, Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, SPSS 22.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL USA). Ranges and median values are reported. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparisons between different time points, and the Mann-Whitney U-Test for comparisons between different groups. Linear correlations were calculated by Spearman’s non-parametric correlation. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Preliminary reference intervals for the urinary catecholamines and metanephrines were generated by the nonparametric method of percentile estimates with confidence intervals to determine the central 95th percentile interval (i.e. 2.5 through 97.5th percentile range) for results from clinically normal dogs [17]. Reference intervals thus determined were: epinephrine: creatinine = 1-18; norepinephrine: creatinine = 1-19; metanephrine: creatinine = 12-255; normetanephrine: creatinine = 14-123.

Results

Catecholamines and metanephrines before and during therapy

Concentrations of catecholamines and metanephrines for dogs with HC before and during trilostane therapy and for healthy dogs are depicted in Fig. 1 and Table 1. In one dog the metanephrine:creatinine ratio could not be measured during trilostane therapy due to a chemical artefact.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Urinary epinephrine (a), norepinephrine (b), metanephrine (c) and normetanephrine:creatinine (d) in dogs with hypercortisolism before (open circles) and during (closed circles) trilostane therapy and in healthy dogs (squares). The horizontal bars represent the median of each group. The shaded area indicates the preliminary reference interval

Table 1

Ranges (median/SEM) of urinary catecholamines and metanephrines to creatinine ratios in dog with hypercortisolism (HC) before and during trilostane therapy and in healthy dogs

Parameters

Dogs with HC

Healthy dogs

 

before therapy

during therapy

 

Epinephrine:creatinine

1-25a

(8 / 2.1)

0.5-19

(6 / 1.7)

1-18

(2 / 0.7)

Norepinephrine:creatinine

6-40a

(11 / 2.9)

4-36a

(9.5 / 3.2)

1-19

(6 / 0.9)

Metanephrine:creatinine

25-145

(70.5 / 10.4)

20-165

(45 / 14.9)

12-255

(58 / 12.3)

Normetanephrine:creatinine

51-300a

(97 / 23.4)

47-345a

(148 / 29.9)

14-123

(51 / 4.8)

asignificant difference compared to healthy dogs

The epinephrine, norepinephrine, and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios before trilostane therapy and the norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios during trilostane therapy of dogs with HC were significantly higher than those of healthy dogs (before: p < 0.01, < 0.01, < 0.0001, respectively; during: p < 0.01, < 0.001, respectively) (Fig. 1).

There was no significant decrease in the epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios of dogs with HC during trilostane therapy (p = 0.1, 0.8, 0.2, 1, respectively) (Fig. 1).

Grouping dogs according to their post-ACTH cortisol concentration during trilostane therapy, revealed 9 dogs with post-ACTH cortisol between 41 and 138 nmol/L (group 1) and 5 with post-ACTH cortisol <41 nmol/L (group 2, no clinical signs of hypocortisolism evident). Concentrations of catecholamines and metanephrines for both groups during trilostane therapy and for healthy dogs are depicted in Fig. 2 and Table 2.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Urinary epinephrine (a), norepinephrine (b), metanephrine (c) and normetanephrine:creatinine (d) in dogs with hypercortisolism during trilostane therapy according to their post-ACTH cortisol concentration (41-138 nmol/L or <41 nmol/L). The horizontal bars represent the median of each group. The shaded area indicates the preliminary reference interval

Table 2

Ranges (median/SEM) of urinary catecholamines and metanephrines to creatinine ratios in dog during trilostane therapy with post-ACTH cortisol between 41 and 138 nmol/L (group 1) and <41 nmol/L (group 2) and in healthy dogs

Parameters

Dogs with HC

Healthy dogs

 

Group 1

Group 2

 

Epinephrine:creatinine

0.5-19a

(7 / 1.8)

1-19

(2 / 3.4)

1-18

(2 / 0.7)

Norepinephrine:creatinine

4-36a

(10 / 4.1)

4-35

(9 / 5.6)

1-19

(6 / 0.9)

Metanephrine:creatinine

20-163

(59 / 19)

25-165

(37 / 26.2)

12-255

(58 / 12.3)

Normetanephrine:creatinine

54-345a

(229 / 36.3)

47-335

(80 / 55)

14-123

(51 / 4.8)

asignificant difference compared to healthy dogs

There was no significant difference in the epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios between the two groups during therapy (p = 0.3, 0.6, 0.6, 0.3, respectively) (Fig. 2). Likewise epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios did not decrease significantly during treatment in both groups (group 1: p = 0.3, 0.7, 0.5, 0.6, respectively; group 2: p = 0.6, 0.5, 0.6, 0.6, respectively). Compared to healthy dogs, however, dogs with post-ACTH cortisol between 41 and 138 nmol/L still had significantly increased epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios (p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, respectively), whereas in dogs with post-ACTH cortisol <41 nmol/L these differences were diminished (p = 0.9, 0.2, 0.07, respectively) (Fig. 2).

There was no significant correlation of epinephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrine or normetanephrine:creatinine ratios with baseline or post-ACTH-stimulated cortisol or with endogenous ACTH concentrations (n = 6) during trilostane therapy (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlations between urinary catecholamines and metanephrines with cortisol and endogenous ACTH concentrations during trilostane therapy

Parameter

Spearman correlation coefficient / p-value

 

Baseline cortisol

Post-ACTH cortisol

Endogenous ACTH

Epinephrine:creatinine

0.01 / 1

0.5 / 0.05

0.2 / 0.7

Norepinephrine:creatinine

−0.18 / 0.5

0.4 / 0.2

−0.1 / 0.8

Metanephrine:creatinine

0.06 / 0.9

0.5 / 0.1

−0.2 / 0.7

Normetanephrine:creatinine

0.16 / 0.6

0.4 / 0.2

−0.8 / 0.06

Discussion

As expected, some dogs with HC had increased urinary catecholamines and metanephrines. This is in agreement with results from previous studies, which showed that in up to 50% of dogs with HC urinary epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios are above those of control dogs [9, 10]. These findings most likely reflect the increased catecholamines synthesis (epinephrine and norepinephrine) and metabolism (conversion into metanephrine and normetanephrine) induced by glucocorticoids [3–7].

Unexpectedly, urinary catecholamines and metanephrines did not decrease significantly during trilostane therapy in dogs with HC, and thus contradicted our hypothesis. There are several possible explanations for this finding. After once-daily trilostane administration cortisol concentrations are unlikely to be reduced over a 24-h period. Trilostane is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of the 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, which mediates the conversion of pregnenolone to progesterone in the adrenal glands [18]. Cortisol, aldosterone and androstenedione are produced from progesterone via different biochemical pathways. Trilostane inhibits the production of progesterone and therefore the synthesis of its end products [19]. It is known that the maximum inhibitory effect of trilostane on glucocorticoid production in dogs is reached 2-4 h after its administration, and that cortisol concentrations re-increase thereafter [20]. In the present study trilostane was dosed once-daily. Twice-daily therapy would lead to a more pronounced decrease in catecholamines and metanephrines concentrations than once-daily therapy, but this hypothesis has to be determined in a future study. Supporting evidence for this hypothesis is that dogs with low post-ACTH cortisol concentration (< 41 nmol/L) had a diminished increase in epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios compared to healthy dogs. In contrast, the increase in epinephrine, norepinephrine and normetanephrine:creatinine ratios persisted in the dogs with post-ACTH cortisol between 41 and 138 nmol/L.

Cortisol secretion during trilostane treatment has been evaluated in a study by Galac et al., where the authors compared urinary corticoid to creatinine ratios (UCCRs) in dogs with PDH before and during trilostane treatment after several months of optimal dosing of trilostane [21]. In that study, although UCCRs decreased significantly during therapy, they did not decrease below the upper limit of the reference range in the majority of the dogs, which might suggest that the influence of cortisol on the body system in trilostane-treated dogs persists, even in controlled dogs. Another interesting result in their study was that during long-term follow-up, a decrease in the UCCR below the upper limit of the reference range was associated with hypocortisolism. This seems similar to our results, where, as mentioned above, only dogs with a post-ACTH cortisol <41 nmol/L had urinary catecholamines and metenaphrines comparable to those of healthy dogs.

Another explanation for the failure to demonstrate a reduction in urinary catecholamines and metanephrines during trilostane therapy might be related to the blood supply of the adrenal medulla. The adrenal medulla gets its main blood supply through the capillaries of the cortex via the cortical-medullary portal system [1]. Due to this vascular system, the adrenal medulla gets in contact with glucocorticoids. In dogs with HC, even though controlled during trilostane therapy, the glucocorticoid concentration, which reaches the adrenal medulla through the portal system, is probably still much higher than under physiologic conditions.

Plasma free catecholamines and metanephrines or urinary catecholamines and metanephrines:creatinine ratios are used to diagnose canine pheochromocytomas [22]. Clinical signs usually result from secretion of excessive amounts of catecholamines, and only rarely from the space-occupying or invasive nature of the tumor [23–29]. Hypercortisolism is one of the most important differential diagnoses of pheochromocytoma. Both diseases may have similar clinical signs (weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, panting) as well as similar ultrasonographic features; in rare cases they can even occur concurrently [10]. In dogs, measurement of plasma free normetanephrine and urinary normetanephrine:creatinine ratio have been shown to be the most reliable biochemical test for diagnosing pheochromocytoma, even in cases in which the two diseases occur concurrently [9, 10, 13, 30]. Metanephrine to creatinine ratios were also significantly higher in dogs with pheochromocytoma compared to those of dogs with HC, but a considerable overlap existed [10]. This is similar to results described in human medicine, where normetanephrine concentrations have the highest sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pheochromocytoma [31, 32]. Most likely, this reflects the fact that the vast majority of human and canine pheochromocytomas predominantly produce norepinephrine, which is metabolized to normetanephrine [10, 30, 31, 33]. Our study shows that dogs with HC treated with once-daily trilostane still have increased urinary concentrations of catecholamines and metanephrines and that diagnosing pheochromocytoma in these dogs might be challenging.

A limitation of the study is its rather low sample size. Another potential limitation is the lack of histopathology to exclude concurrent pheochromocytoma. However, only post mortem histopathology would reliably exclude concurrent pheochromocytoma, which is difficult to obtain in a clinical setting with medically treated patients. To minimize the risk of concurrent pheochromocytoma, we included only dogs with no obvious adrenal mass and with good clinical control after 6 months of trilostane therapy. Even though all dogs included seemed clinically well controlled, some dogs might have been overdosed according to their post-ACTH cortisol value (< 41 nmol/L). This lack of a proven gold standard test is another limitation of studies evaluating dogs during trilostane therapy.

Conclusions

Although dogs with HC can be controlled during once-daily trilostane therapy, it is likely that urinary concentrations of catecholamines and metanephrines remain increased, reflecting a constant influence of the endogenously increased cortisol concentration in these dogs.

Abbreviations

HC: 

hypercortisolism

HCl: 

hydrochloric acid

LDDS test: 

low-dose dexamethasone suppression test

L-DOPA: 

L-dihydroxyphenylalanine

PDH: 

pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism

PNMT: 

phenylethanolamin-N-Methyltransferase

UCCRs: 

urinary corticoid to creatinine ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the veterinarians of the Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine for their contribution of cases. We thank all dog owners for their assistance and willingness to take part in this study.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the findings of the present study are included within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

NSR, FB, CR, ES, SQ participated in the conceptual aspect and design of the study. ES, SQ, NSR, FB, CR, KR were involved in the samples and data collection. ES, SQ, BR, KR, RHL performed the samples analysis. NSR, FB, CR, BR, RHL, KR performed statistical evaluation and data interpretation. NSR and FB wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with all authors involved in reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval

The use of the dogs was approved by the veterinary office of the canton of Zurich and was in accordance with the guidelines and directives established by the Animal Welfare Act of Switzerland (TVB 199/2004). Informed consent of all pet owners was obtained before including the dogs in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(2)
Clinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(3)
Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(4)
Dr. Quante’s current address is Peace Avenue Veterinary Clinic G/F, Hong Kong, China

References

  1. Rosol TJ, Yarrington JT, Latendresse J, Capen CC. Adrenal gland: structure, function, and mechanisms of toxicity. Tox Pathol. 2001;29:41–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisenhofer G, Kopin IJ, Goldstein DS. Catecholamine metabolism: a contemporary view with implications for physiology and medicine. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56:331–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodman R, Edgar D, Thoenen H, Wechsler W, Herschman H. Glucocorticoid induction of tyrosine hydroxylase in a continuous cell line of rat pheochromocytoma. J Cell Biol. 1978;78:R1–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Tai TC, Claycomb R, Her S, Bloom AK, Wong DL. Glucocorticoid responsiveness of the rat phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;61:1385–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yoshida-Hiroi M, Bradbury MJ, Eisenhofer G, Hiroi N, Vale WW, Novotny GE, Hartwig HG, Scherbaum WA, et al. Chromaffin cell function and structure is impaired in corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor type 1-null mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7:967–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wurtman RH. Control of epinephrine synthesis in the adrenal medulla by the adrenal cortex: hormonal specificity and dose-response curves. Endocrinol. 1966;79:608–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Weiner N, Blaschko H. Adrenal gland endocrinology. In: Sayers G, Smith AD, editors. Endocrinology: adrenal gland. Washington DC: American Physiology Society; 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Critchley JA, Henderrson CG, Moffat LE, Ungar A, Waite J, West CP. Proceedings: the release of catecholamines from perfused canine adrenal glands by corticoglucocorticoids. J Physiol. 1976;254:30P–1P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Quante S, Boretti FS, Kook PH, Mueller C, Schellenberg S, Zini E, Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, Reusch CE. Urinary catecholamine and metanephrine to creatinine ratios in dogs with hyperadrenocorticism or pheochromocytoma, and in healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2010;24:1093–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Salesov E, Boretti FS, Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, Rentsch KM, Riond B, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Kircher PR, Grouzmann E, et al. Urinary and plasma catecholamines and metanephrines in dogs with pheochromocytoma, hypercortisolism, nonadrenal disease and in healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2015;29:597–602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Mueller C, Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS, Wenger M, Kaser-Hotz B, Reusch CE. Low-dose dexamethasone test with “inverse” results: a possible new pattern of cortisol response. Vet Rec. 2006;159:489–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kook PH, Boretti FS, Hersberger M, Glaus TM, Reusch CE. Urinary catecholamine and metanephrine to creatinine ratios in healthy dogs at home and in a hospital environment and in 2 dogs with pheochromocytoma. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:388–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kook PH, Grest P, Quante S, Boretti FS, Reusch CE. Urinary catecholamine and metadrenaline to creatinine ratios in dogs with a pheochromocytoma. Vet Rec. 2010;166:169–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodriguez Pineiro MI, Benchekroun G, de Fornel-Thibaud P, Maurey-Guenec C, Garnier F, Rosenberg D. Accuracy of an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) immunoluminometric assay for differentiating ACTH-dependent from ACTH-independent hyperadrenocorticism in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23:850–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott-Moncrieff JC, Koshko MA, Brown JA, Hill K, Refsal KR. Validation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay for plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone in the dog. Vet Clin Pathol. 2003;32:180–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Braun C, Boretti FS, Reusch CE, Sieber-Ruckstuhl NS. Comparison of two treatment regimes with trilostane in dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2013;155:551–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed AH, Henry RJ, Mason WB. Influence of statistical method used on the resulting estimate of normal range. Clin Chem. 1971(17):275–84.Google Scholar
  18. Ruckstuhl NS, Nett CS, Reusch CE. Results of clinical examinations, laboratory tests and ultrasonography in dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism treated with trilostane. Am J Vet Res. 2002;63:506–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Potts GO, Creange JE, Hardomg HR, Schane HP. Trilostane, an orally active inhibitor of steroid biosynthesis. Steroids. 1978;32:257–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehnert C, Neiger R. 24 hour hormone and electrolyte levels of dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism treated with trilostane. Giessen: Inaugural-Dissertation; 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Galac S, Buijtels JJ, Kooistra HS. Urinary corticoid: creatinine ratios in dogs with pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism during trilostane treatment. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23:1214–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, Bornstein SR, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grossman AB, Kimura N, Mannelli M, et al. Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice form the first international symposium. October 2005. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:92–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Berzon JL. A metastatic pheochromocytoma causing progressive paraparesis in a dog. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1981;76:675–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bouayad H, Feeney DA, Caywood DD, Hayden DW. Pheochromocytoma in dogs: 13 cases (1980-1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987;191:1610–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilson SD, Withrow SJ, Wheeler SL, Twedt DC. Pheochromocytoma in 50 dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 1994;8:228–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Barthez PY, Marks SL, Woo J, Feldman EC, Matteucci M. Pheochromocytoma in dogs: 61 cases (1984-1995). J Vet Intern Med. 1997;11:272–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Out G. Pheochromocytoma in dogs: a retrospective study of nine cases (1981-1987). Can Vet J. 1989;30:526–7.Google Scholar
  28. Platt SR, Sheppard BJ, Graham J, Uhl EW, Meeks J, Clemmons RM. Pheochromocytoma in the vertebral canal of two dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1998;34:365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Santamarina G, Espino L, Vila M, Lopez M, Aleman N, Suarez ML. Aortic thromboembolism and retroperitoneal hemorrhage associated with a pheochromocytoma in a dog. J Vet Intern Med. 2003;17:917–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gostelow R, Bridger N, Syme HM. Plasma-free metanephrine and free normetanephrine measurement for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2013;27:83–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Unger N, Pitt C, Schmidt IL, Walz MK, Schmid KW, Philipp T, Mann K, Petersenn S. Diagnostic value of various biochemical parameters for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in patients with adrenal mass. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:409–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Guller U, Turek J, Eubanks S, Delon ER, Oertli D, Feldman JM. Detecting pheochromocytoma. Defining the most sensitive test. Ann Surg. 2006;243:102–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhofer G, Siegert G, Kotzerke J, Bornstein SR, Pacak K. Current progress and future challenges in the biochemical diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paraganliomas. Horm Metab Res. 2008;40:329–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us