Open Access

Diversity of Escherichia coli strains involved in vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers in Brazil

  • Juliana Fortes Vilarinho Braga1, 2,
  • Nathalie Katy Chanteloup2,
  • Angélina Trotereau2,
  • Sylvie Baucheron2,
  • Rodrigo Guabiraba2,
  • Roselene Ecco1 and
  • Catherine Schouler2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201612:140

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0762-0

Received: 11 February 2016

Accepted: 23 June 2016

Published: 14 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Locomotor disorders and infections by Escherichia coli represent major concerns to the poultry industry worldwide. Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) is associated with extraintestinal infections leading to respiratory or systemic disease known as colibacillosis. The most common lesions seen in cases of colibacillosis are perihepatitis, airsacculitis, pericarditis, peritonitis/salpingitis and arthritis. These diseases are responsible for significant economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. E. coli has been recently isolated from vertebral osteomyelitis cases in Brazil and there are no data on molecular and phenotypic characteristics of E. coli strains isolated from lesions in the locomotor system of broilers. This raised the question whether specific E. coli strains could be responsible for bone lesions in broilers. The aim of this study was to assess these characteristics of E. coli strains isolated from broilers presenting vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis in Brazil.

Results

Fifteen E. coli strains from bone lesions were submitted to APEC diagnosis and setting of ECOR phylogenic group, O serogroup, flagella type, virulence genes content, genetic patterns by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) and Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST). In addition, bacterial isolates were further characterized through a lethality test, serum resistance test and antibiotic resistance profile. E. coli strains harbored different genetic pattern as assessed by PFGE, regardless of flock origin and lesion site. The strains belonged to seven sequence types (STs) previously described (ST117, ST101, ST131, ST 371 and ST3107) or newly described in this study (ST5766 and ST5856). ECOR group D (66.7 %) was the most frequently detected. The strains belonged to diverse serogroups (O88, O25, O12, and O45), some of worldwide importance. The antibiotic resistance profile confirmed strains’ diversity and revealed a high proportion of multidrug-resistant strains (73 %), mainly to quinolones and beta-lactams, including third generation cephalosporin. The percentage of resistance to tetracycline was moderate (33 %) but always associated with multidrug resistance.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers can be associated with highly diverse E. coli based on molecular and phenotypic characteristics. There was no specific virulence patterns of the E. coli strains associated with vertebral osteomyelitis or arthritis. Also, E. coli strains were frequently multidrug resistant and belonged to STs commonly shared by APEC and human ExPEC strains.

Keywords

Broilers Bacterial infections APEC Virulence genes Pathology Multidrug-resistant E. coli

Background

Escherichia coli is a genetically diverse bacteria comprising non-pathogenic intestinal strains and pathogenic strains responsible for intestinal and extra-intestinal disease [1]. The strains able to cause disease in chickens are known as Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). APEC is associated with extraintestinal infections leading to respiratory or systemic disease known as colibacillosis. These diseases are responsible for significant economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide, which may occur by decreased hatching rates, mortality, lowered production, carcass condemnation at processing and treatment costs [2]. The most common lesions associated with colibacillosis are perihepatitis, airsacculitis and pericarditis, although other syndromes such as osteomyelitis, arthritis, yolk peritonitis, peritonitis/salpingitis (SPS syndrome), coligranuloma, omphalitis and cellulitis can also be found [3].

Another challenge to modern poultry industry is locomotor disorders, which represent a major economic and welfare problem. Although these disorders may be classified according to underlying pathology as infectious, developmental and degenerative, this classification is difficult since these categories are not mutually exclusive [4]. Infectious conditions such as osteomyelitis, arthritis (or osteoarthritis) and synovitis can be associated with different etiologic agents [3]. Among bacteria, Staphylococcus sp. (mainly, S. aureus) was isolated from these diseases, although an increase in the incidence of musculoskeletal infection associated with E. coli has been reported [5].

Brazil, which is currently the largest exporter and the second largest producer of poultry meat in the world, faces challenges with colibacillosis and locomotor disorders the same form as other countries with relevant poultry industry. There are no data on molecular and phenotypic characteristics of E. coli strains isolated from lesions in the locomotor system of broilers, although E. coli has been recently isolated from vertebral osteomyelitis cases in Brazil [6]. This raises the question whether specific E. coli strain could be responsible for bone lesions in broilers. The aim of our work is to provide data on the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of E. coli strains isolated from vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis cases in broilers from Brazil.

Methods

Samples

Fifteen E. coli strains isolated between 2012 and 2014 from broilers presenting vertebral osteomyelitis or arthritis at commercial poultry farms in the state of Minas Gerais, Southeast of Brazil, were studied. The broilers were from eight different flocks, which represent seven different farms. They had variable ages and gender. All experimental procedures were approved by the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation (CETEA) under protocol 205/2011.

Clinical signs and pathology

For clinical examination, broilers presenting locomotor disorders were placed in station and encouraged to move for change in gait and posture assessment. Then, broilers were euthanized by cervical dislocation for necropsy and gross evaluation. The locomotor system was analyzed for size, shape, color, flexibility and breaking strength. The vertebral column of all broilers was sectioned along the longitudinal midline for vertebral body and spinal cord analysis. The free thoracic vertebra was considered as T4. Articulations were analyzed for size and aspects of the synovial fluid in the articular space. Samples for bacterial isolation were collected aseptically from broilers presenting osteomyelitis or arthritis. Tissue sections were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin for 48 to 56 hours. Then, formalin-fixed-vertebral column, intertarsal and femorotibial articulations with lesions were decalcified in 24 % formic acid. For slide preparation, tissues were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations, diaphoanised in xylene, embedded in paraffin to obtain 4-μm thick serial sections and then stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Goodpasture for further analysis under a light microscope.

Bacterial isolation and identification

Swabs of the lesions were inoculated onto two blood agar (BA) plates and one MacConkey agar (MCK) plate. One BA plate was incubated in microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C for 24 to 72 h, while the others were incubated at the same temperature and time under aerobic conditions. After the initial growth, morphology of isolated colonies was characterized and these same colonies were subcultured, Gram stained and submitted to catalase and oxidase tests. Bacterial isolates were subjected to automatic bacterial identification through VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Inc. Hazelwood, MO, USA) using commercially available identification cards for Gram-negative bacteria in accordance to the manufacturer’s recommendations. After bacterial identification, the colonies were inoculated into microtubes containing Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) broth with 30 % glycerol and stored at - 80 °C until subsequent molecular and phenotypic tests described below.

APEC diagnosis tests

The diagnosis of APEC strains was performed by different methods previously described. The ability of E. coli strains to induce lethality in 1-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicks (detailed on section Lethality test) was considered gold standard test to assess strain pathogenicity. In addition, two molecular methods based on genetic profiles were used: 1) detection of minimal predictors described by Johnson et al. [7], which classify an E. coli strain as pathogenic based on the minimum detection of four out of five virulence genes (iroN, ompT, hlyF, iss and iutA); and 2) genotyping method developed by Schouler et al. [8], which is based on the identification of different associations of virulence genes (iutA, sitA, aec26, P (F11) fimbriae, O78, frz orf4 ) that allow the APEC strains classification in four genetic patterns of virulence (A, B, C and D).

Serogrouping

Determination of O antigens was carried out by agglutination using antisera O1, O2, O5, O8, O15, O18, O25, O45, O78, O88, O111 and O120, according to the method described by Blanco et al. [9]. The O antisera were produced in the Laboratorio de Referencia de Escherichia coli (Lugo, Spain). Furthermore, PCR was performed to detect O1, O2, O4, O6, O7, O8, O12, O16, O18, O25a, O45a, O45b, O75, O78, O88 and O104 antigens, as previously described (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Flagellar type

The strains were submitted to PCR to determine flagella type H4, H7, H8, H21 and H25 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Those strains negative for all flagellar types tested by PCR were submitted to motility test. Briefly, bacteria were grown on LB broth overnight. Then, the strains were deeply inoculated in LB plates 0.3 % agar using a Pasteur pipette and then incubated at 37 °C overnight for motility evaluation the following day [10].

ECOR phylogenetic grouping

E. coli strains were classified into the four main ECOR phylogenetic groups by triplex PCR as described by Clermont et al. [11]. Strains were assigned to phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2, or D according to the amplification of the chuA and yjaA genes and the TspE4C2 fragment. Strains MG1655, ECOR26, ECOR62, and ECOR50 were used as controls for phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2, and D, respectively.

Virulence genotyping

Total DNA extracts were prepared by a rapid boiling method [12]. The presence of genes encoding virulence factors were determined using primers and PCR amplification programs previously described, together with positive control strains (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Single PCR assays were used to detect sfaS, focG, tsh, ibeA, aatA, neuC, irp2, ireA, sat, vat, astA, fyuA, hlyA, traT, cva/cvi, iucD, hra, iha, pic, csgA, tia, malX (=rpai), KpsMTII, cnf 1 and cnf 2. Furthermore, some multiplex assays were performed to detect simultaneously clbB and clbN, and fimA, fim avMT78 and fimH. DNA fragments were amplified in a 25-μL PCR mix containing 1 U of GoTaq®G2 Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega), 12.5 pmol of the forward and reverse primers, and 5 nmol of deoxynucleotide triphosphate mix (Eurogentec) in 1x GoTaq®G2 Flexi buffer. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 to 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature according to GC-content of primers for at least 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s to 45 s according to the size of the amplified fragment (1 min/kbp), and then a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min.

Pulsed-field gel eletrophoresis (PFGE)

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was conducted as previously described [13]. Bacterial cells (equivalent to an OD600 of 1.0) grown in BHI broth were harvested by centrifugation. The cellular pellet was resuspended in 500 μL of buffer TE 100 (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9, 100 mM EDTA) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The bacterial suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 2.0 % low-melting-point agarose and dispensed into plug molds (Biorad). Agarose plugs were incubated in a lysozyme solution (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9, 100 mM EDTA, 5 mg lysozyme ml−1, 0.05 % sarkosyl) for 2 h at 37 °C, and then incubated overnight at 55 °C in a lysis solution (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 9, 100 mM EDTA, 1 mg proteinase K ml−1, 1 % SDS). After lysis, agarose plugs were washed three times in a TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH8, 1 mM EDTA) for 1 h at room temperature, where the first washing buffer was supplemented with 100 mM PMSF (Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). For digestion, plugs were equilibrated in incubation buffer containing XbaI restriction enzyme (Takara) overnight. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was conducted in a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad). Gels (1 % agarose) were run at 14 °C for 24 h in TBE buffer (4 mM Tris, 4 mM borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) at 6 V cm−1. Pulse times were increased from 10 to 30 s. XbaI restriction fragments of Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 were used as size markers. Cluster analysis using Dice similarity indices was done in BioNumerics 6.6 software (at 0.5 % tolerance and 0.5 % optimization) (Applied Maths, Ghent, Belgium) to generate a dendrogram describing the relationships among PFGE profiles.

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

The phylogenetic relationships between strains were studied using MLST method initially described by Maiden et al. [14] and E. coli Achtman’s scheme (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli/). E. coli MLST scheme used internal fragments of seven house-keeping genes: adk (adenylate kinase), fumC (fumarate hydratase), gyrB (DNA gyrase), icd (isocitrate/isopropylmalate dehydrogenase), mdh (malate dehydrogenase), purA (adenylosuccinate dehydrogenase) and recA (ATP/GTP binding motif). They were amplified in a total volume of 20 μL containing 4 μL of DNA crude extract as a template, 2.5 U of GoTaq®G2 Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega), 10 pmol of each primer, 5 nmol of deoxynucleoside triphosphate 30 mM MgCl2 in 1x buffer. PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, variable annealing temperature (54 °C, 60 °C, 64 °C, 58 °C, 62 °C, 62 °C or 58 °C, respectively) for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplicons were sequenced on both strands and sequence type (ST) of each allele was attributed according to Achtman’s scheme. Novel STs described in this work were submitted to the E. coli MLST database and identified as ST5856 and ST5766.

Lethality test

Strain virulence was evaluated by a lethality test using 1-day-old chicks as previously described [15]. Lethality test was carried out in the experimental infection unit PFIE (Plateforme d’Infectiologie Expérimentale, INRA Val de Loire). For each strain, groups of five 1-day-old SPF chicks were inoculated subcutaneously with 0.5 mL of an overnight culture in LB-Miller broth without agitation (inoculum in stationary phase was ~108 CFU). Mortality was recorded at 4 days post inoculation and the strains were classified as pathogenic when at least one chick died [16]. Avian E. coli strains BEN2908 and BEN2269 (a non-pathogenic avian E. coli isolate of serogroup O2) were used as positive (5 chicks died) and negative control (no chicks died), respectively. The housing, husbandry and slaughtering conditions conformed to European Guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals. French regional ethics committee number 19 (Comité d’Ethique en Expérimentation Animale Val de Loire) approved this protocol under the reference 2012-11-5.

Serum bactericidal test

The serum bactericidal assay was performed as previously described by Dozois et al. [17] with some modifications. Briefly, bacteria were grown overnight in LB broth at 41 °C with agitation (180 rpm). Then, bacterial cultures were resuspended in fresh medium (OD600 = 0.02), incubated at 41 °C with agitation (180 rpm), and harvested during the logarithmic growth phase (DO600 = 0.35). Bacteria were washed at room temperature with dulbeco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0 ~ 7.3) and then resuspended to a concentration of 2x106 CFU/mL. A volume of 500 μL of bacterial suspension was added to 500 μL of complement or inactivated (56 °C, 30 min) SPF chicken serum, which were incubated at 41 °C without agitation. Viable cell counts were counted at 0 h and 3 h by plating 10-fold dilutions in sterile saline solution on LB agar plates. Compared to the bacterial count in inactivated serum, a strain was considered resistant when the bacterial count increased or did not change, intermediate when the bacterial count decreased up to one order of magnitude, and sensitive when bacterial count decreased more than one order of magnitude. Serum resistant (BEN2908) and serum sensitive (BEN4134) E. coli strains were used as positive and negative controls.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology (http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org). The antibiotics tested belong to seven different classes: aminoglycosides (gentamicin, Gen; neomycin, Neo; apramycin, Apr), beta-lactams (amoxicillin, Amx; amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, Amc), cephalosporins (cephalotin, Cef; cefoxitin, Fox; ceftiofur, Xnl), phenicols (florfenicol, Ffc), polypeptides (colistin, Cst), quinolones (nalidixic acid, Nal; flumequine, UB; enrofloxacin, Enr), sulfonamides (trimethoprim, Tmp; Tmp + sulfamethoxazole, TmpStx), and tetracyclines (tetracycline, Tet). The presence of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) was detected by double-disk synergy method [18]. E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was used as quality control.

Results

Epidemiological features of E. coli strains and PFGE

E. coli strains were isolated from eight flocks in the municipalities of Belo Horizonte, Bom Jesus de Amparo, Igarapé, Igaratinga, Itabira and São Sebastião do Oeste, all located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Management and biosecurity practices varied among the farms, with broilers number per flock ranging from 20,000 to 40,000. Broiler farms usually raise broilers up to approximately 42 to 45 days before processing them. Broilers studied were 40 to 56 days-old (average of 46 days-old). Antibiotics usage in sampled farms included enrofloxacin, fosfomycin, amoxicillin, and trimethoprim sulfa, which were most commonly used to treat respiratory or enteric diseases. Antibiotics such as zinc bacitracin and colistin were confirmed to be frequently used as growth promoters, although information on its use was not available for all farms.

The fifteen E. coli strains presented different genetic profiles and revealed to be highly diverse, even for same flock isolates (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Molecular and phenotypic characterization of 15 Escherichia coli strains isolated from broilers with osteomyelitis and arthritis. Black and white boxes represent positive and negative results, respectively. Flock ID, number of the flock of origin; Lesion, VO: vertebral osteomyelitis, Art: arthritis; Serotype, ns: non-serotyped; Flagella, nm: non-motile, nc: non-correspondent to any flagellar type tested; ST, Sequence type; ECOR: ECOR phylogenetic group; APEC (Johnson et al.): APEC diagnosis according to Johnson et al. (2008); APEC (Schouler et al.); APEC diagnosis according to Schouler et al. (2012); Yes: APEC strain, No: non-APEC strain; pVAGs, pattern of virulence genes described by Schouler et al. (2012), nc: non-correspondent to the described patterns; Iron acquisition, genes encoding iron acquisition system; Adhesin, genes encoding adhesins; Toxin, genes encoding toxins; Protectin, genes encoding protectins; Invasin, genes encoding invasins; Miscellaneous, genes encoding different kinds of virulence; VAGs (%), percentage of APEC-associated virulence genes; Lethality score, number of chicks that died at the fourth day post-infection with E. coli; Serum resistance, R: serum resistant strain, I: intermediate resistant strain, S: serum sensitive strain; N° resistant AB: number of antibiotics to which the strain was resistant; Antibiotic resistance profile: gentamicin, Gen; neomycin, Neo; apramycin, Apr; amoxicillin, Amx; amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, Amc; cephalotin, Cef; cefoxitin, Fox; ceftiofur, Xnl; florfenicol, Ffc; colistin, Cst; nalidixic acid, Nal; flumequine, UB; enrofloxacin, Enr; trimethoprim, Tmp; Tmp + sulfamethoxazole, TmpStx; tetracycline, Tet; pansusceptible, PanSus

Clinic and pathological findings of the diseases

Vertebral osteomyelitis

The clinic and pathological findings and the total of broilers examined were previously described in details by Braga et al. [6]. Clinically, affected broilers presented partial or total gait impairment according to the degree of vertebral body enlargement (T4 vertebra) and consequent spinal cord compression, which varied from mild to severe (Fig. 2a). Gross lesions were characterized by caseonecrotic osteomyelitis with protrusion of affected vertebral body and spinal cord compression (Fig. 2b, c). Histopathological evaluation of affected vertebral body included caseonecrotic osteomyelitis frequently associated with intralesional Gram-negative bacteria, besides degeneration and necrosis of overlying spinal cord (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 2

Clinical signs and gross pathology of vertebral osteomyelitis (a, b, c) and arthritis (d, e, f) in broilers. a Broiler showing the classical clinical sign of severe cases of vertebral osteomyelitis. b Note the enlargement of affected vertebral body (T4), c which revels caseonecrotic material and spinal cord compression on longitudinal section. d Broiler with bilateral arthritis showing ventral recumbency and retracted legs. e Suppurative exudate in articular cavity in acute arthritis, f which extended to proximal tibiotarsus causing tibial osteomyelitis

Fig. 3

Histopathology of osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers. a Vertebral osteomyelitis showing enlargment of vertebral body (T4) by caseonecrotic material (remanescent, arrow), which compresses spinal cord (*); HE. b Caseonecrotic hererophilic and histiocytic exudate (*) in the articular space with intralesional bacterial colonies (arrow); HE. Inset: Gram-negative bacteria stained by Goodpasture. c Necrotic synovitis (arrow) associated with caseonecrotic exudate within the articular space (*); HE. d Proximal growth plate (physis) of tibiotarsus showing extensive necrosis (*) with heterophilic exudate in a case of tibial osteomyelitis; HE

Arthritis

Broilers presented different degrees of limited mobility depending on the joint lesion site (unilateral or bilateral). When there was involvement of only one leg, broilers could stay in station, although avoiding to support the affected limb on the floor. In bilateral cases, birds often remained in ventral recumbency, with retracted members and supporting their weight on the pectoral muscles (Fig. 2d). Gross evaluation showed swollen of affected joints and, on cut surface, the aspect of lesions varied according to the course of disease. In acute lesions, there was mild to moderate suppurative exudate within synovial fluid and involving articular capsule, occasionally extending to adjacent tendon sheaths, musculature, and subcutaneous tissue (Fig. 2e). In one case, the inflammatory process extended to adjacent proximal tibiotarsus leading to tibial osteomyelitis characterized by indistinct growth plate and metaphysis, which were replaced by necrosuppurative exudate (Fig. 2f). In chronic cases, there was moderate to severe caseofibrinous arthritis. Occasionally, acute arthritis in an antimere and chronic arthritis in the contralateral antimere were observed in the same broiler. Histopathological analysis of acute lesions revealed moderate to intense fibrinoheterophilic and histiocytic arthritis. In chronic cases, there was caseonecrotic heterophilic and histiocytic arthritis, often associated with myriads of intralesional bacterial colonies (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, necrotic synovitis and synovial hyperplasia were occasionally observed (Fig. 3c). In lesions with greater intensity and extension, involvement of adjacent periarticular structures was characterized by degeneration and necrosis of skeletal muscles or osseous tissue (Fig. 3d) associated with hyperemia, infiltration of heterophils and macrophages and fibrin. In addition, proliferation of fibrous tissue in the articular capsule and adjacent tissue was found in more advanced cases.

APEC diagnosis

According to lethality test, 12 E. coli strains were considered as APEC, since four strains killed 5 out 5 chicks, two strains killed 4 out 5 chicks, two killed 3 out 5 chicks, two killed 2 out 5 chicks, and two killed 1 out 5 chicks. One strain (EC02) did not kill any chick, but was considered as APEC according to Johnson et al. [7], which classify an E. coli strain as pathogenic based on the presence of minimum four out of five virulence genes carried by plasmids associated with highly pathogenic APEC. The results of molecular tests previously described to diagnose APEC showed an agreement of 80.0 % (12/15) (Fig. 1). According to Johnson et al. [7] and Schouler et al. [8], 10 E. coli strains were considered APEC and two were considered as non-pathogenic strains. Although there were three discrepancies between both tests, these three APEC strains were diagnosed alternatively by one of the tests and the final criteria for APEC diagnosis was the lethality test.

Group O serotyping and flagella

Different serogroups were detected among the strains, mainly O12 (13.3 %), O88 (13.3 %), O25 (6.7 %), and O45 (6.7 %) (Fig. 1). High percentage (60.0 %) of strains did not correspond to any of the O somatic antigen surveyed in this study, and were classified as non-serotyped (NS). The most prevalent flagellar types were H4 (66.7 %) and H8 (13.3 %), and only for one motile strain it was not possible to identify the corresponding flagella (Fig. 1). H4 was detected in O12, O25 and non-serotyped strains, while O88 strains were H8.

MLST and ECOR phylogroups

The strains were assigned to seven different sequence types (STs) (Fig. 1). Most strains (86.7 %, 13/15) were grouped in known STs, while 13.3 % (2/15) were new STs described in this work. The most frequent ST was ST117 and represented 53.3 % (8/15) of E. coli strains, followed by ST101 (13.3 %, 2/15). ST131, ST371 and ST 3107 were identified once each. When classified into ECOR phylogenic groups, most strains were D (66.7 %, 10/15), followed by A (13.3 % 2/15), B1 (13.3 %, 2/15) and B2 (6.7 %, 1/15) (Fig. 1).

Virulence genes profile

APEC strains showed highly variable content of virulence genes, although those responsible for iron acquisition and adhesion were detected more frequently (Fig. 1). The non-pathogenic strains showed marked lack of virulence genes when compared to APEC strains, with higher content of adhesin encoding genes.

Bactericidal effect of serum

High percentage of E. coli strains, 53.3 % (8/15), was serum resistant, while 33.4 % (5/15) was characterized as serum sensitive and 13.3 % (2/15) as intermediate strains (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Antibiotic resistance profile

The E. coli strains studied presented a large diversity of antibiotic resistance profiles (Fig. 1). One E. coli strain was pansusceptible, but high percentage (73.0 %) of strains were resistant to more than three classes of antibiotics and defined as multidrug-resistant E. coli. These eleven multidrug-resistance strains were mainly characterized by resistance to amoxicillin (100.0 %), enrofloxacin (54.5 %), ceftiofur (54.5 %), and tetracycline (45.4 %). The E. coli strains were more resistant to nalidixic acid (quinolone class) and amoxicillin (beta-lactam class), 80.0 % and 73.3 % respectively (Fig. 4). Susceptibility or low resistance to polypeptides (0.0 %,) and phenicols (6.7 %,) were observed. One non-pathogenic E. coli strain (EC18) was suspected to produce an ESBL by the synergy observed between amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ceftiofur using the disk diffusion method.
Fig. 4

Percentages of antibiotic resistance of E. coli strains isolated from vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers by antibiotic class: (a) quinolones; (b) beta-lactams; (c) cephalosporins; (d) sulfonamides; (e) tetracyclines; (f) aminoglycosides; (g) phenicols; and (h) polypeptides

Discussion

Our results showed that E. coli strains involved in vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis cases in broilers in Brazil are highly diverse. We observed that the same disease (i.e., vertebral osteomyelitis) was caused by genetically diverse E. coli strains with different pathogenicity traits in the same flock (flock 3). Furthermore, genetically diverse strains were recovered from different diseases (i.e., vertebral osteomyelitis or arthritis) in the same flock (flocks 2, 5 and 6). These findings show that both diseases are not caused by a unique E. coli strain. Other authors also report genetic diverse populations of E. coli in field cases of colibacillosis in a single flock [19] or in different flocks [20].

E. coli is one of the bacteria described as etiological agent of vertebral osteomyelitis [5]. Recent data on etiological agents of this disease in broilers described involvement of single or mixed bacteria including Enterococcus spp., E. faecalis, E. hirae and Staphylococcus aureus, besides E. coli [6]. This feature can be similar to what have been previously proposed on turkey osteomyelitis complex (TOC), in which bacterial arthritis and osteomyelitis are associated to involvement of many different opportunistic microorganisms, suggesting that is likely to be influenced by factors such as immunosuppression rather than by the pathogenicity intensity of these bacteria [21].

Diversity in serogroups among E. coli strains was also remarkable, as exemplified by the detection of serogroup O12, which up to now was not described in Brazilian E. coli strains from human or animal origin. Strains belonging to this serogroup exhibited profile O12:H4-ST117 and were isolated from two broilers from the same flock presenting only arthritis. Previous studies on serogroup determination of E. coli isolated from septicemic and healthy broilers revealed that O12 was involved in only 1 % of colisepticemia cases, but was one of the serogroups predominantly identified among septicemic E. coli [22]. O12 E. coli strain was also reported in human, isolated from an immunocompetent woman with a history of repeated amnion infections and spontaneous abortion [23].

An E. coli strain O45:HNM-D-ST371 was also detected in this study. This type of strain has been described previously in 16.4 % (9/55) of O45 E. coli strains isolated from avian colibacillosis cases in Europe and it was identified only in O45 E. coli strains of avian origin, different from O45:K1:H7-B2-ST95 identified in avian and human E. coli isolates [24]. However, this last one was not detected in Brazilian APEC strains described here and in previous studies [25].

ST 117, which represents more than half of our E. coli strains, and ST 131 were involved in osteomyelitis and arthritis cases. These STs are commonly shared by APEC and human ExPEC strains [25]. Close genetic relations have been detected in ST 117 E. coli strains of animal and human origin, which have been identified in large poultry producers such as Brazil [25], USA [26], and also Egypt [27], Denmark [28], Sri Lanka [29], and South Korea [30].

We also identified two ST101 APEC strains, which belonged to phylogroup B1, serotype O88:H8 and were non-ESBL as evaluated by the disk diffusion method. This ST was not related to infections caused by APEC until recently, when one O15:H10-B1-ST101 APEC strain was isolated from colibacillosis associated lesions in Spain [20].

ST131 is a globally disseminated multidrug resistance clone, responsible for urinary tract and bloodstream infections in humans. Its rapid emergence and successful spread is strongly associated with antibiotic resistance [3133]. One O25:H4-B2-ST131 E. coli strain was detected in a broiler joint with arthritis in this study. In Brazil, this clone was previously detected in APEC strains recovered from broilers with different visceral lesions [34] and from APEC and human ExPEC collections [25]. Although few data are available on this clonal group from poultry, Mora et al. [35] reported an increasing presence of clonal group O25b:H4-ST131 in retail chickens. Interestingly, a retail chicken sample revealed macrorestriction profile indistinguishable from an E. coli strain isolated from a human with urinary tract infection [36].

High percentage of multidrug resistant E. coli was detected in this study. It is known that E. coli strains isolated from poultry frequently show resistance to more than one antimicrobial drug [37], which represents a global concern. It has been shown that poultry workers may have increased risk of carrying multidrug-resistant E. coli, which demonstrates that occupational exposure to antimicrobial-resistant E. coli from live-animal contact in the broiler industry may be an important route of entry for antimicrobial-resistant E. coli into the community [38].

Most E. coli strains analyzed in this study exhibited resistance to at least one antibiotic from different main classes: beta-lactams, cephalosporins and quinolones. Resistance to these antibiotic classes is a chronic problem described for avian E. coli strains isolated in Brazil [34, 39]. A concern is the increasing resistance to ceftiofur, which was evident when we compared our E. coli strains to those isolated from broilers in previous years in Brazil [34]. This finding is probably the result of increasing usage of this drug in poultry and highlights the need for responsible and controlled use of antibiotics in animals. A major public health concern is that the use of third-generation cephalosporins, such as ceftiofur, in food animals is leading to resistance to other extended-spectrum cephalosporin molecules, which are used in the treatment of many different human infections [40].

Tetracycline resistance level of the E. coli strains studied was lower than that described in other regions of Brazil [34, 39] and in other countries, such as China, where resistance to tetracycline can reach about 90 % [41]. For many years, tetracycline was used as prevention and as growth promoter in poultry, but the use of antibiotics with these purposes was banned since 2009 in Brazil. In the state of Minas Gerais, where samples were collected, tetracycline use has no longer being recommended by poultry veterinarians due to its prohibition and bacterial resistance (personal information). These data suggest that the discontinued use of tetracycline in poultry in the region may have provided an increase in the number of E. coli strains susceptible to this drug, as described for Salmonella strains in USA, where it was observed significant reduction of humans and swine strains resistant to tetracycline after its prohibition as prophylactic drug in animal feed [42].

All 15 E. coli strains studied were isolated from the exudate of osteomyelitis or arthritis lesions. The strains EC11 and EC18 classified as non-pathogenic were also isolated from broilers with vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis, respectively. In these cases, necrotic and inflammatory lesions were associated with bacterial colonies constituted by Gram negative rods, including strains classified as non-APEC. The single or double colonies picked up from the pure culture of E. coli probably resulted in the selection of a non-APEC clone, once it is known that in the same lesion it is possible to find distinct E. coli clone populations. In order to avoid the selection of a non-representative bacterial clone, it is recommended to select and mix several colonies from the pure culture isolated from the lesion for further evaluation [43]. This procedure provides more efficient results, especially regarding to antimicrobial susceptibility, since it can reduce a possible variation in the susceptibility of isolated clones and improve the selection of antibiotics for treatment.

The broilers had no additional gross lesions in other sites at necropsy, except in two: one exhibited vertebral osteomyelitis and intertarsal arthritis and another broiler had intertarsal arthritis with osteomyelitis in proximal tibiotarsus of the same antimere. Although the information on previous respiratory disease was not available for all flocks studied, it is known that colibacillosis is frequent in broilers of the region (laboratory and field observations). Localization of E. coli in bones and synovial tissues is a common sequel of colisepticemia [3]. Some studies with turkeys demonstrated that often multiple sites are involved and the bones most often affected are tibiotarsus, femur, thoracolumbar vertebra, and humerus [44]. Bacteria colonizing the vascular sprouts that invade the physis of a growing bone, provoke an inflammatory response that results in osteomyelitis. Transphyseal blood vessels in birds serve as conduits for the process to spread bacteria into the joint and surrounding soft tissues [45].

Conclusions

Our results showed that highly diverse E. coli strains can be recovered from osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers, even in the same flock. Based on molecular and phenotypic characteristics, there is no specific virulence pattern of the E. coli associated with vertebral osteomyelitis or arthritis. Some of the strains involved in these diseases are belonged to STs commonly shared by animals and humans, similar to others previously isolated from different lesions in broilers. Most of these strains are multidrug resistant, with increasing rates of ceftiofur resistance, which is a public and animal health concern. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate management practices, which are valuable in preventing and controlling colibacillosis, thus reducing the need for antibiotics use in animals.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nathalie Lallier for her valuable technical assistance on PFGE and lethality tests, and the personnel from the experimental unit PFIE (Plateforme d’Infectiologie Expérimentale) at the INRA- Centre Val de Loire, Nouzilly (France). We also thank Jorge Blanco and Ghizlane Dahbi from Laboratorio de Referencia de E. coli (LREC) of the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) for kindly providing the antisera.

Funding

This study was supported by INRA (France), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) project 14/2010 and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials supporting the results of this study are present in the main manuscript and in the additional files.

Authors’ contributions

RE, JFVB and CS designed of the study. JFVB and RE performed sampling and pathological analysis. JFVB, NKC, AT, RG and CS performed the tests for molecular and phenotypic characteristics of E. coli, except antibiotic resistance test, which was performed by JFVB and SB. All the authors reviewed the literature, read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures for sampling were approved by the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation (CETEA) under protocol 205/2011. The housing, husbandry and slaughtering conditions conformed to European Guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals. French regional ethics committee number 19 (Comité d’Ethique en Expérimentation Animale Val de Loire) approved the protocol under the reference 2012-11-5.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinárias, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
(2)
ISP, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours

References

  1. Dale AP, Woodford N. Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC): Disease, carriage and clones. J Infect. 2015;71:615–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.09.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ. Virulence factors of Escherichia coli serotypes associated with avian colisepticaemia. Res Vet Sci. 2002;73:27–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00075-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes HJ, Nolan LK, Vaillancourt JP. Colibacillosis. In: Saif YM, Fadly AM, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Swayne DE, editors. Diseases of Poultry. Ames (Iowa): Blackwell Publishing; 2008. p. 691–732.Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw RH, Kirkden RD, Broom DM. A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broilers in relation to welfare. Avian Poult Biol Rev. 2002;13:45–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.3184/147020602783698421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Riddell C. Leg problems still important. Poult Diag. 1997;56:28–31.Google Scholar
  6. Braga JFV, Silva CC, Teixeira MPF, Martins NRS, Ecco R. Vertebral osteomyelitis associated with single and mixed bacterial infection in broilers. Avian Path. Published on line first July 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2016.1193843.
  7. Johnson TJ, Wannemuehler Y, Doetkott C, Johnson SJ, Rosenberger SC, Nolan LK. Identification of minimal predictors of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence for use as a rapid diagnostic tool. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3987–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00816-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Schouler C, Schaeffer B, Brée A, Mora A, Dahbi G, Biet F, Oswald E, Mainil J, Blanco J, Moulin-Schouleur M. Diagnostic strategy for identifying avian pathogenic Escherichia coli based on four patterns of virulence genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1673–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.05057-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanco M, Blanco JE, Blanco J, González EA, Mora A, Prado C, Fernández L, Rio M, Ramos J, Alonso MP. Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 and other verotoxin-producing E. coli in healthy cattle. Epidemiol Infect. 1996;117:251–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800001424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke MB, Sperandio V. Transcriptional regulation of flhDC by QseBC and σ 28 (FliA) in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:1734–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:4555–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4555-4558.2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Moulin-Schouleur M, Schouler C, Tailliez P, Kao MR, Brée A, Germon P, Oswald E, Mainil J, Blanco M, Blanco J. Common virulence factors and genetic relationships between O18:K1:H7 Escherichia coli isolates of human and avian origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3484–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00548-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Maiden MC, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feayers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:3140–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dho M, Lafont JP. Adhesive properties and iron uptake ability in Escherichia coli lethal and nonlethal for chicks. Avian Dis. 1984;28:1016–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1590278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dozois CM, Dho-Moulin M, Brée A, Fairbrother JM, Desautels C, Curtiss R. Relationship between the Tsh autotransporter and pathogenicity of avian Escherichia coli and localization and analysis of the tsh genetic region. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4145–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.7.4145-4154.2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dozois CM, Fairbrother JM, Harel J, Bossé M. Pap-and pil-related DNA sequences and other virulence determinants associated with Escherichia coli isolated from septicemic chickens and turkeys. Infect Immun. 1992;60:2648–56. DOI http://dx.doi.org/0019-9567/92/072648-09.00/0.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarlier V, Nicolas M, Fournier G, Philippon A, Jarlier V, Nicolas M, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum, 3-lactamases conferring transferable in resistance to newer 13-lactam hospital agents Enterobacteriaceae: prevalence and susceptibility patterns P-lactamase of nosocomial infections. Rev Infect Dis. 1998;10:867–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/10.4.867.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozaki H, Murase T. Multiple routes of entry for Escherichia coli causing colibacillosis in commercial layer chickens. J Vet Med Sci. 2009;71:1685–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.001685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Solà-Ginés M, Cameron-Veas K, Badiola I, Dolz R, Majó N, Dahbi G, Viso S, Mora A, Blanco J, Piedra-Carrasco N, González-López JJ, Migura-Garcia L. Diversity of multi-drug resistant Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) causing outbreaks of colibacillosis in broilers during 2012 in Spain. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143191.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Huff GR, Huff WE, Rath NC, Balog JM. Turkey osteomyelitis complex. Poult Sci. 2000;79:1050–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.1050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Blanco JE, Blanco M, Mora A, Jansen WH, García V, Vázquez ML, Blanco J. Serotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from septicaemic chickens in Galicia (Northwest Spain). Vet Microbiol. 1998;61:229–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00182-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Blum-Oehler G, Heesemann J, Kranzfelder D, Scheutz F, Hacker J. Characterization of Escherichia coli serotype O12:K1:H7 isolates from an immunocompetent carrier with a history of spontaneous abortion and septicemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;16:153–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mora A, Viso S, López C, Alonso MP, García-Garrote F, Dabhi G, Maman R, Herrera A, Marzoa J, Blanco M, Blanco JE, Moulin-Schouleur M, Schouler C, Blanco J. Poultry as reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli O45:K1:H7-B2-ST95 in humans. Vet Microbiol. 2013;167:506–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maluta RP, Logue CM, Casas MRT, Meng T, Guastalli EAL, Rojas TCG, Montelli AC, Sadatsune T, Ramos MDC, Nolan LK, Silveira WD. Overlapped sequence types (STs) and serogroups of avian pathogenic (APEC) and human extra-intestinal pathogenic (ExPEC) Escherichia coli isolated in Brazil. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Danzeisen JL, Wannemuehler Y, Nolan LK, Johnson TJ. Comparison of multilocus sequence analysis and virulence genotyping of Escherichia coli from live birds, retail poultry meat, and human extraintestinal infection. Avian Dis. 2013;57:104–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hussein AH, Ghanem IA, Eid AA, Ali MA, Sherwood JS, Li G, Nolan LK, Logue CM. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chicken flocks in Egypt. Avian Dis. 2013;57:602–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pires-dos-Santos T, Bisgaard M, Christensen H. Genetic diversity and virulence profiles of Escherichia coli causing salpingitis and peritonitis in broiler breeders. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162:873–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dissanayake DRA, Octavia S, Lan R. Population structure and virulence content of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from outbreaks in Sri Lanka. Vet Microbiol. 2014;168:403–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lim JS, Choi DS, Kim YJ, Chon JW, Kim HS, Park HJ, Moon JS, Wee SH, Seo KH. Characterization of Escherichia coli-Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Isolated from Chicken Slaughterhouses in South Korea. Foodborne Pathogens and Dis. 2015;12:741–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1921.
  31. Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Blanco J, Leflon-Guibout V, Demarty R, Alonso MP, Caniça MM, Park YJ, Lavigne JP, Pitout J, Johnson JR. Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:273–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Peirano G, Pitout JDD. Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli producing CTX-M β–lactamases: the worldwide emergence of clone ST131 O25:H4. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35:316–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers BA, Sidjabat HE, Paterson DL. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131:pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Barbieri NL, Oliveira AL, de Tejkowski TM, Pavanelo DB, Matter LB, Pinheiro SRS, Vaz TM, Nolan LK, Logue, CM, Brito BG, de Horn F. Molecular characterization and clonal relationships among Escherichia coli strains isolated from broiler chickens with colisepticemia. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12:74–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1815.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mora A, Herrera A, Mamani R, López C, Alonso MP, Blanco JE, Blanco M, Dahbi G, García-Garrote F, Pita JM, Coira A, Bernárdez MI, Blanco J. Recent emergence of clonal group O25b:K1:H4-B2-ST131 ibeA strains among Escherichia coli poultry isolates, including CTX-M-9-producing strains, and comparison with clinical human isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:6991–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01112-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Vincent C, Boerlin P, Daignault D, Dozois CM, Dutil L, Galanakis C, Reid-Smith RJ, Tellier PP, Tellis PA, Ziebell K, Manges A R. Food reservoir for Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:88–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Zanatta GF, Kanashiro AMI, Castro AGM, Cardoso ALSP, Tessari ENC, Pulici SCP. Suscetibilidade de amostras de Escherichia coli de origem aviária a antimicrobianos. Arq Inst Biol. 2004;71:283–6.Google Scholar
  38. Price LB, Graham JP, Lackey LG, Roess A, Vailes R, Silbergeld E. Elevated risk of carrying gentamicin-resistant Escherichia coli among U.S. poultry workers. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1738–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10191.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Korb A, Nazareno ER, Costa LD, Nogueira KS, Dalsenter PR, Tuon FFB, Pomba MC. Tipagem molecular e resistência aos antimicrobianos em isolados de Escherichia coli de frangos de corte e de tratadores na Região Metropolitana de Curitiba, Paraná. Pesq Vet Bras. 2015;35:258–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2015000300008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao S, White DG, Mcdermott PF, Friedman S, English L, Ayers S, Maurer JJ, Holland R, Walker RD, Meng J. Identification and expression of cephamycinase bla CMY genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from food animals and ground meat. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2001;45:3647–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.12.3647.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang T, Wang CG, Lv JC, Wang RS, Zhong XH. Survey on tetracycline resistance and antibiotic-resistant genotype of avian Escherichia coli in North China. Poult Sci. 2012;91:2774–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Manie T, Khan S, Brözel VS, Veith WJ, Gouws PA. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from slaughtered and retail chickens in South Africa. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998;26:253–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00312.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Clermont O, Glodt J, Burdet C, Pognard D, Lefort A, Branger C, Denamur E. Complexity of Escherichia coli bacteremia pathophysiology evidenced by comparison of isolates from blood and portal of entry within single patients. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:529–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mutalib A, Miguel B, Brown T, Maslin W. Distribution of Arthritis and Osteomyelitis in Turkeys with Green Liver Discoloration. Avian Dis. 1996;40:661–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1592278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bayyari GR, Huff WE, Rath NC, Balog JM, Newberry LA, Villine JD, Skeeles JK. Immune and physiological responses of turkeys with green-liver osteomyelitis complex. Poult Sci. 1997;76:280–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement