Open Access

Fishmeal supplementation during ovine pregnancy and lactation protects against maternal stress-induced programming of the offspring immune system

  • Rebecca E. Fisher-Heffernan1,
  • Mamun M. Or’Rashid1,
  • Ousama AlZahal1,
  • Margaret Quinton1,
  • Herman J. Boermans2,
  • Brian W. McBride1,
  • Timothy R. H. Regnault3, 4 and
  • Niel A. Karrow1Email author
BMC Veterinary Research201511:266

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0573-8

Received: 28 April 2015

Accepted: 5 October 2015

Published: 15 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Prenatally stressed offspring exhibit increased susceptibility to inflammatory disorders due to in utero programming. Research into the effects of n-3 PUFAs shows promising results for the treatment and prevention of these disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether maternal fishmeal supplementation during pregnancy and lactation protects against programming of the offspring’s immune response following simulated maternal infection.

Methods

In order to accomplish this, 53 ewes were fed a diet supplemented with fishmeal (FM; rich in n-3 PUFA) or soybean meal (SM; rich in n-6 PUFAs) from day 100 of gestation (gd 100) through lactation. On gd135, half the ewes from each dietary group were challenged with either 1.2 μg/kg Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin to simulate a bacterial infection, or saline as the control. At 4.5 months of age the offspring’s dermal immune response was assessed by cutaneous hypersensitivity testing with ovalbumin (OVA) and candida albicans (CAA) 21 days after sensitization. Skinfold measurements were taken and serum blood samples were also collected to assess the primary and secondary antibody immune response.

Results

Offspring born to SM + LPS mothers had a significantly greater change in skinfold thickness in response to both antigens as well as a greater secondary antibody response to OVA compared to all treatments.

Conclusions

Supplementation during pregnancy with FM appears to protect against adverse fetal programming that may occur during maternal infection and this may reduce the risk of atopic disease later in life.

Keywords

Fishmeal Sheep Dermal hypersensitivity test Fetal programming

Background

Adverse uterine environments caused by maternal stress and infection can alter the planned programming of various tissues, organs and systems of the fetus. When the re-programming of these systems do not match the predicted environment, the offspring may be more susceptible to inflammatory diseases such as atopy, cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes in later life [110]. This hypothesis has recently become one of the main focuses in atopic disease research.

With the increase in atopic disorders, such as asthma, food allergies and atopic dermatitis in the Westernized population, it is speculated that genetic predisposition itself cannot be solely responsible, and focus is being placed on in utero events and environmental factors that may be playing a contributing role [1113]. Prenatal stress and the associated rise in glucocorticoids (GCs), as well as the high concentration of pro-inflammatory mediator omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-6 PUFA) has been found to be a factor contributing to the susceptibility to atopic diseases by altering the programming of both the immune system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) [14, 15]. For example, alterations in the HPAA through fetal programming have been shown to increase the occurrence of respiratory, and skin diseases [1618]. These alterations in HPAA programming may be responsible for the typical increase in T helper type 2 (Th2) lymphocytes as well as the associated cytokines and chemokines observed in individuals who were prenatally stressed and those with atopic disease [19, 20]. During normal pregnancy the dominant immune response is of Th2 origin and this helps to facilitate maternal tolerance for the fetus. Shortly after parturition the balance between Th2:Th1 is restored. However, in prenatally stressed individuals, it has been suggested that this shift may be delayed, which may increase the susceptibility to atopic diseases [11].

Recent studies suggest that supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) may help to alleviate atopic disorders during both childhood and adulthood [2123]. Unlike n-6 PUFAs, n-3 PUFAs promote anti-inflammatory mediators and may help protect against inflammatory challenges. For example, n-3 PUFAs have been shown to alter T lymphocyte gene expression profiles by suppressing their differentiation. Their function is also inhibited due to decreased concentrations of cytokines, chemokines and immunoglobulins associated with these responses [2426]. However, it appears that the timing, type and dosage of n-3 PUFA supplementation may be crucial in the treatment of atopic disease, as various studies have also shown no beneficial affects with supplementation [27, 28]. Previous studies have focused their efforts on postnatal impacts, however the role of n-3 during pregnancy and an activation of protection is ill defined.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether maternal fishmeal (FM) supplementation rich in n-3 PUFA can protect the offspring’s immune system from simulated maternal infection. It was hypothesized that maternal supplementation with n-3 PUFAs would protect the offspring from maternal endotoxin challenge and will decrease the dermal immune response and antibody-specific response to novel antigens. In order to test this objective a sheep model will be used. Sheep are an excellent model for humans as their offspring are a similar size at birth, and their brain development occurs during fetal development.

Methods

Ewe parameters and experimental procedures

Fifty-three cross-bred Rideau-Arcott ewes were used in a randomized block design. All animals were housed at the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) Ponsonby Sheep Research facility. Beginning on day 100 of gestation (gd 100; gestation period ~145 days) ewes were allocated to a diet rich in either fishmeal (FM; high in n-3 PUFA) or soybean meal (SM; high in n-6 PUFA) and maintained on the diet through 50 days of lactation. The SM diet was considered the control diet in this study because this diet is commonly fed to sheep in Ontario, Canada. Ewes were housed individually indoors in an 8′ × 4′ pen and offered feed twice a day at 2.5 % of body weight for a total amount of 2.64 kg of feed/day (0.312 kg supplement, 0.441 kg mixed grain, 0.630 kg chopped hay and 1.261 kg alfalfa pellet) with average feed intake of 2.53 kg of feed/day in the FM group and 2.59 kg of feed/day in the SM group during gestation. During lactation 3.90 kg of feed/day was offered (0.455 kg supplement, 0.652 kg mixed grain, 0.931 kg chopped hay and 1.862 kg alfalfa pellets) with average feed intake of 3.83 kg of feed/day in the FM group and 3.877 kg of feed/day in the SM group. The amount of DHA and EPA fed per day in the FM supplement was 0.85 g/day during gestation and 1.23 g/day during lactation, while that of the SM was 0.10 g/day during gestation and 0.15 g/day during lactation. In comparison the amount of linoleic acid fed per day in the FM supplement was 0.85 g/day during gestation and 1.33 g/day lactation, while 1.24 g/day during gestation and 1.94 g/day during lactation was fed per day in the SM supplement. This resulted in n-6:n-3 ratios of 1.0 for the FM supplement and 13.2 for the SM supplements. Nutrient requirements were based on both the weight and age of the ewes and were calculated from the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for sheep (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY). Data from a preliminary trial demonstrated that dietary PUFA concentrations plateau approximately 27 days after the introduction of the dietary supplement [29]. A detailed dietary composition can be found in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Diet and nutrient composition (DM basis) for soybean meal (SM) and fishmeal (FM) supplemented diets fed to ewes

Ingredientsa

Soybean meal (% DM)

Fishmeal (% DM)

Mixed grain (barley, oats, corn)

16.34

16.34

Alfalfa hay

24.72

24.72

Alfalfa pellets

47.26

47.26

Supplement

 Soybean meal

6.62

-

 Fishmeal

-

4.73

 Feather meal

2.36

1.47

 Wheat grain

0.71

2.36

 Wheat shorts

-

1.68

 Calcium mono phosphate

0.66

0.25

 Calcium carbonate

0.57

0.42

 Salt

0.42

0.38

 Magnesium oxide

0.19

0.23

 Mineral and vitaminsb

0.16

0.16

Chemical compositionc

 DM (%)

90.7

90.7

 CP (N X 6.25)

21.6

21.6

 ADF

22.7

22.5

 NDF

35.3

36.3

 Lignin

4.7

4.8

 Crude fat

2.6

2.8

 NFCd

37.6

37.1

 MEe(MCAL/kg)

2.1

2.1

DM dry matter, SM soybean meal, FM fishmeal, NFC non-fibre carbohydrate

The following are presented as % DM: CP, ADF, NDF, lignin, crude fat and NFC. Adapted from Or-Rashid et al. [52]

aThe inclusion rate for all dietary ingredeints is presented on a % dry matter basis

bMaster Feeds Inc., London, Ontario, Canada

cAll chemical components expressed on a % of dry matter basis except ME

dNon-fibre carbohydrates = 100 -[(NDF - neutral detergent insoluble protein) + CP + crude fat + ash]

eCalculated using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep (CNCPS-Sheep v.1.0.21, Cornell University, Ithica, NY, USA) using chemical analysis

Table 2

Fatty acid composition of various dietary components: alfalfa pellets, alfalfa hay, mixed grains (barley, oats, and corn), the SM and FM supplements presented as content (g)/100 g

Percent of total fatty acid

Alfalfa pellets

Alfalfa hay

Mixed grain

SM supplement

FM supplement

10:0

0.266

0.000

0.000

0.202

0.142

12:0

0.538

0.328

0.025

0.132

0.117

14:0

1.274

0.592

0.313

0.770

3.049

14:1

0.061

0.000

0.000

0.052

0.070

16:0

19.496

23.932

18.974

16.033

19.768

16:1–9c

0.433

0.365

0.206

2.104

4.940

18:0

3.625

3.071

1.623

4.808

3.665

18:l–9c

3.775

3.126

24.987

25.064

16.206

18:l–11c

0.638

0.821

1.185

1.687

3.057

18:2n-6

20.758

21.322

47.905

26.993

17.197

20:0

1.132

1.775

0.240

0.562

0.454

20:1

0.000

0.000

1.008

0.223

1.425

18:3n-3

44.984

41.920

3.007

18.390

10.868

22:0

1.475

1.256

0.206

0.309

0.236

20:4n-6

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.191

0.729

20:5n-3

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.732

6.096

24:0

1.542

1.493

0.322

0.346

0.192

22:5n-3

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.093

0.713

22:6n3

0.000

0.000

0.000

1.309

11.073

On gd135, half of each the ewes from each dietary treatment group were endotoxin challenged with a 2 ml i.v bolus of 1.2 μg/kg body weight of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli 055:B5 (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario) dissolved in saline, or a 2 ml bolus of saline for control (CON). Health status such as febrile response, respiration rate and haptoglobin concentrations of these ewes were previously reported in Stryker et al. [30]. The treatment groups and animal numbers are as follows SM + LPS (n = 12), SM + CON (n = 13), FM + LPS (n = 14) or FM + CON (n = 14).

All block trials were conducted under the strict ethical guidelines set out by the University of Guelph Animal Care Committee in accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care (Protocol number 07R052).

Lamb parameters and experimental procedures

Eighty-nine lambs were born from the 53 ewes [(SM + LPS (n = 19); SM + CON (n = 21); FM + LPS (n = 24); FM + CON (n = 25)]. In order to ensure adequate milk supply to the lambs, ewes were allowed to raise a maximum of 2 lambs that remained with their dam until 50 days of age. Once weaned lambs were housed in groups indoors at the OMAFRA Ponsonby General Animal Facility. All lambs were fed the same diet of lamb grower and hay ad libitum.

At 4.5 months of age, all lambs were antigen sensitized with two 1 ml i.m. injections containing of 0.5 mg/ml of ovalbumin (OVA; Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario) or 0.5 mg/ml of candida albicans (CAA; Greer Laboratories Inc., Lenoir, North Carolina) dissolved in 0.5 mg/ml Quil-A adjuvant and saline. Ten days following sensitization, lambs received a booster of the same concentration of OVA and CAA. On day 21 post sensitization, lambs underwent i.d. cutaneous hypersensitivity testing on both sides of the neck using OVA and CAA at a concentration of 100 μg/50 μl saline, as well as saline as a control. Skinfold measurements were performed using Harpenden Skinfold Calipers (Creative Health Products, Ann Arbor, Michigan) 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post challenge.

Blood sampling and IgG ELISA

Blood samples were collected on day 0, 10, and 21 days post sensitization to assess the primary and secondary immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody-mediated immune response to OVA. Serum blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture using 10 ml clot-activated serum vacutainers and allowed to clot for 30 min at room temperature prior to centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 15 min. Serum was stored at −80 °C until IgG specific antibodies were analyzed.

The OVA specific antibody response was measured using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plates were coated with 1.4 mg/ml OVA dissolved in carbonate coating buffer and stored at 4 °C for 48 h. Plates were then washed five times with 200 μl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) + 0.05 % tween 20. Blocking solution (ELISA ultrablock, Serotec, Raleigh, NC) was added to the plate at 200 μl per well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were again washed five times and serum samples and reference standard curve samples were added to wells at 100 μl/well and incubated for 2 h. Serum was diluted as follows, day 0 samples were diluted 1/50, day 10 1/500 and day 21 1/4000. The plates were again washed 5 times with 200 μl PBS + 0.05 % tween 20 and conjugate rabbit-anti-sheep IgG antibody was added to the plates at a dilution of 1/4000 and incubated for 1 h. The plates were then washed and alkaline phosphatase yellow liquid substrate system (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) was then added to the wells at 80 μl and incubated for 30 min. The plate absorbance was read on Victor Wallac Plate Reader at a wavelength of 405 nm. Intra- and inter- plate coefficients of variation for the ELISA plates were 1.48 and 5.24 % respectively.

Statistical analysis

Separate analyses were performed on both the OVA and CAA skinfold thickness measurements on the offspring at the test site. All sites were analyzed as randomized complete block designs with subsampling and with repeated measurements over time on each subsample using the same model. Measurements of OVA and CAA skinfold thickness were performed on a log scale and measurements at 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72 h were expressed as differences from time 0 measurements. The model accounted for the 7 blocks, 53 ewes and 89 lambs as random effects and the 2 diets (fishmeal versus soymeal) and 2 challenges (LPS versus control) plus their interaction, the sex of the offspring, time and interactions among time, challenge and diet as fixed effects. The number of offspring born per ewe was also included as a covariate to account for any in utero effects. The mixed model procedure from SAS (version 9.4) was used to perform the analysis. Repeated measurements over time for each offspring were handled according to the approach given by Wang and Goonewardene (2004) which recommends using the best-fitting (co)variance structure over time [31]. The Akaike criterion was used to determine the appropriate structure for these analyses which was unstructured for both the CAA and OVA saline sites, Toeplitz for the CAA test site and heterogeneous autocorrelation for the OVA test site. Linear and quadratic orthogonal polynomial contrasts over time and interactions of these with the diets and challenges were used to assess differences in the changes of skinfold thickness over time among the diets and challenges. The mixed model procedure from SAS (version 9.2) was also used to analyze repeated IgG measurements over time for each offspring per ewe. Significant differences over time were reported at a P-value < 0.05 and trends over time were indicated by P-values ranging from 0.06 to 0.10. Residual plots were examined for all analyses, and showed no evidence of variance heterogeneity.

Results

All lambs survived this study with no significant treatment differences in body weight. The plasma n-3 PUFA concentrations at weaning (50 days of age), where the least square means of EPA concentrations were 1.33 for FM and 1.109 for SM offspring and DHA concentrations were 1.72 for FM and 1.53 for SM offspring. At the time of hypersensitivity testing (135 days of age) there was no difference in plasma n-3 concentrations where EPA concentrations were 0.528 for FM and 0.520 for SM offspring and DHA concentrations were 1.16 for FM and 1.26 for SM offspring [32].

Dermal hypersensitivity response to OVA and CAA Antigens

All lambs responded to both OVA and CAA dermal hypersensitivity challenge with a significant increase in skinfold thickness represented by both linear and quadratic over time (P < 0.05, Fig. 1). Offspring born to SM + LPS mothers demonstrated the greatest increase in skinfold thickness trend to both antigens compared to their control counterparts (SM + CON) as well as both FM treatment groups (FM + LPS, FM + CON, P < 0.05; Fig. 1). There was no difference in contrasts for skinfold thickness trends to either OVA or CAA between FM treatment groups (FM + LPS, FM + CON; P > 0.05; Fig. 1). There was also a three-way interaction of diet by treatment by quadratic time between the FM + LPS lambs and the SM + LPS lambs to the CAA antigen (P < 0.05; Fig. 1 b, d). Therefore, quadratic time trends differed between dietary groups but also between treatment groups.
Fig. 1

Offspring change in skinfold thickness following cutaneous hypersensitivity test with OVA and CAA. This figure depicts offspring born to mothers supplemented with fishmeal and challenged with saline (FM + CON) or endotoxin (FM + LPS), or offspring born to mothers supplemented with soybean meal and challenged with saline (SM + CON) or endotoxin (SM + LPS). The lettering in the graph represent the specific gender response the antigen; a represents the response of female offspring to OVA antigen, b represents the response of female offspring to CAA antigen, c represents the response of male offspring to OVA antigen and d represents the response of male offspring to CAA antigen. Data are reported as least squared means ± SE

Linear and quadratic sex difference trends were also observed following both CAA and OVA dermal sensitivity challenge. The diet by treatment by sex contrast demonstrated an increase in skinfold thickness trends, which was greater in female and male offspring born to SM + LPS dams as compared to all other treatment groups within the same sex (P < 0.05; Fig. 1). There was also a significant difference in the trends over time with female and male FM + LPS lambs having a slightly greater change in skinfold thickness to the CAA antigen compared to the FM + CON lambs of the same sex (P < 0.05; Fig. 1 b, d). This trend was not present at the OVA test site over time in the FM offspring in which both groups responded slightly to the same degree in both sexes (Fig. 1 a, c). A sex difference trend was observed between female and male offspring born to SM + LPS dams over time during the CAA challenge. Quadratic trends demonstrated that SM + LPS female offspring had a greater skinfold thickness response over time to CAA antigen compared to male offspring (P < 0.05; Fig. 1 b, d). There were no differences over time observed between male and female offspring born to FM + LPS or FM + CON dams (P > 0.05).

Serum OVA-specific IgG response

There was an increase in OVA IgG concentrations over time across all treatment groups demonstrating that the inoculation protocol worked to induce both a primary and secondary IgG immune response (P < 0.05; Fig. 2). Offspring from SM + LPS mothers had an increased OVA- specific IgG response during both the primary (d 10) and secondary (d 21) immune response compared to all other treatment groups (P < 0.05). Unlike the SM treatment groups, a difference was not observed between offspring born to FM + LPS or FM + CON mothers.
Fig. 2

Offspring change in OVA specific IgG response during the primary (d 10) and secondary (d 21) immune response. This figure depicts offspring born to mothers supplemented with fishmeal and challenged with saline (FM + CON) or endotoxin (FM + LPS), or offspring born to mothers supplemented with soybean meal and challenged with saline (SM + CON) or endotoxin (SM + LPS). Data are reported as least squared means ± SE

Sex differences were only observed for the secondary IgG immune response. Female offspring from SM + LPS mothers had a greater secondary IgG response compared to their male counterparts (P < 0.05; Fig. 2). This trend was not observed in any of the other treatment groups. Additionally, SM + LPS female offspring had a greater concentration of OVA-specific IgG antibodies compared to the female offspring born to both SM + CON and FM + LPS mothers. This response was not observed between male offspring. However, SM + LPS male offspring tended to have a greater IgG response following the primary immune response compared to SM + CON male offspring (P < 0.10).

Discussion

Maternal infection during pregnancy has been shown to increase the offspring’s susceptibility to atopic disease [1]. Recent studies have shown that n-3 PUFA supplementation may provide protection from atopic disease because of its immunomodulatory properties [3335]. This study investigated whether maternal supplementation with FM (high in n-3) could protect the offspring’s immune system from maternal stress caused by a simulated bacterial infection using endotoxin. The offspring’s immune response was assessed by cutaneous hypersensitivity tests to novel antigens OVA and CAA, as well as the IgG response to OVA. All offspring responded to both antigens with an increase in skinfold thickness, and a primary and secondary response to the OVA antigen. As expected offspring born to mothers supplemented with SM and challenged with endotoxin had the greatest secondary antibody response to OVA antigen as well as the greatest increase in skinfold thickness to both OVA and CAA compared to all other treatment groups. Other studies have demonstrated alterations in both the dermal hypersensitivity response and Ab-mediated response but this was during n-3 PUFA supplementation. One study showed that fish oil supplemented cats had a significantly lower skinfold thickness response to an intradermal injection of histamine compared to the control group [36]. While Lauritzen et al. [37], demonstrated that fish oil supplementation to mouse dams decreased their offspring’s IgG1 antibody response to OVA compared to dams consuming an n-3 PUFA deficient diet or a linseed diet (rich in n-6 PUFA) [37]. The IgE antibody response to OVA has also been shown to be decreased following supplementation with fish oil in mice [38]. Additionally, many studies looking at atopic dermatitis and allergies in humans have also showed improvement in the disorder following supplementation with n-3 PUFAs [28, 39, 40]. Therefore, it appears that n-3 PUFA supplementation may improve atopic disease, however, further research is required to determine the proper dietary inclusion level as well as timing of treatment, as multiple studies that have demonstrated no differences or even increases in both the skinfold thickness and the Ab response with n-3 PUFAs [41, 42]. One should also note that FM and fish sources of n-3 PUFAs might also contain various other fatty acids and amino acids that could also influence the immune response of the offspring.

When comparing to the above-mentioned studies, this is the first study to investigate whether FM supplementation during gestation and lactation can protect the offspring from programming following simulated maternal infection during late gestation. This study is different from others as supplementation with n-3 PUFAs occurred solely through the dam and the offspring n-3 PUFA concentrations were not different across treatments at the time of challenge with OVA and CAA. n-3 PUFA EPA enrichment was observed at 50 days of age with greater concentrations of EPA in the plasma of offspring from FM supplemented dams demonstrating that maternal supplementation during gestation and lactation does in fact cause enrichment in the lambs. However, these differences were small and warrant further investigation into PUFA partitioning in the body to assess whether greater enrichment occurred in other tissues or organs. Nonetheless this suggests that n-3 PUFA supplementation during pregnancy could help reduced the risk of topic disease later in life as well as reducing the risk of infection-induced programming.

Alterations in the ratio of Th1:Th2 lymphocytes and associated mediators have been reported as a factor in the development of atopic disease and it has been suggested that n-3 PUFAs may be acting in a way to restore the balance. For example, various animal models have demonstrated that maternal supplementation with n-3 PUFAs may reverse the skewed Th2 biased response as they have been shown to promote a Th1 population with the increase in IL-2 and IFNγ [25, 43]. This shift in the Th population may explain the differences observed in the skinfold thickness response and Ab-response to OVA in the current study as OVA is typically thought of as a Th2 antigen. However, it does account for the observed decrease in the skinfold thickness response to the CAA, a known Th1 antigen. Therefore, this suggests that a different mechanism may be at work.

Recently, T regulatory cells (T regs) have been shown to play a role in the reduction of atopic disease. T regs are found in the lymph nodes, spleen, and peripheral blood, help to maintain tolerance again allergens [44]. T regs act to suppress the proliferation of Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes as well as their function [44, 45]. It was previously suggested that pregnancy hormones supported a Th2 dominant immune profile, however, new evidence suggests that Tregs induce maternal tolerance to the fetus and help to maintain a successful pregnancy [46]. It has also been shown that maternal stress can reduce the number of T regs at the maternal-fetal interface and this may influence programming of the fetal immune system to one that is less tolerant to novel antigens [11, 47, 48]. Interestingly, supplementation with both DHA and EPA increases the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β as well as Foxp3, a transcription factor required for the production and function of T regs [49]. With this in mind it is speculated that n-3 PUFAs suppress the Th1 and Th2 response by up-regulating T regs and T reg mediators. This may also explain the observed hypersensitivity and Ab suppression in the FM + LPS from the present study offspring and not the SM + LPS offspring to both OVA and CAA antigens, although further research is needed to validate this hypothesis.

Sex differences were also observed in this study between male and female offspring born to SM + LPS mothers. To our knowledge this is the first study to investigate the sex effects of offspring born to mothers supplemented with PUFAs and challenged with endotoxin. It was observed that female offspring had a greater skinfold measurement to the CAA antigen compared to the male offspring. Female offspring also had a greater IgG response to OVA antigen compared to their male counterparts. There was no difference between FM groups observed. This is not surprising, as females have typically demonstrated greater antibody responses to allergens and vaccine. For example, female mice exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, which is known to increase allergic sensitization, and then sensitized with OVA demonstrated greater OVA specific IgG1 and IgE in their serum compared to males [50, 51]. Although females in this study demonstrated the greatest increase in OVA specific IgG, one cannot conclude that the males were not also susceptible to this type of programming, as the male offspring born to SM + LPS mothers also demonstrated great differences in the skinfold measurements to both antigens. This emphasizes the fact that the timing and type of stressor as well as species differences may need to be taken into account for when using animal models. Based on these results of this study, however, it appears that maternal supplementation with FM helps to counteract the in utero programming of offspring’s risk of allergic disease later in life regardless of sex.

Conclusions

Overall this study has provided insight into the potential benefits of supplementing maternal diets with FM to reduce the risk of atopy. It is apparent that FM provides a protective effect from maternal endotoxin challenge during late gestation as indicated by the decrease in offspring change in skinfold thickness in response to OVA and CAA as well as a decreased IgG response to OVA in female offspring. Future studies should focus on the immune and epigenetic mechanisms involved in this protective effect.

Abbreviations

CAA: 

Candida Albicans

CON: 

Control treatment group

FM: 

Fishmeal

HPAA: 

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

GC: 

Glucocorticoid

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

n-3 PUFA: 

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid

n-6 PUFA: 

Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid

OVA: 

Ovalbumin

SM: 

Soybean meal

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by grants awarded to Dr. Niel Karrow from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Gartshore Memorial Sheep Research Fund.

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs’ Sheep Research and General Animal Facilities, Judy Stryker, Qiumei You, Laura Cain, Graham Biggar, Dr. Chris Verschoor and Dr. Sameer Pant for their help with this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Children’s Health Research Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, Western University
(4)
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University

References

  1. Collier CH, Risnes K, Norwitz ER, Bracken MB, Illuzzi JL. Maternal infection in pregnancy and risk of asthma in offspring. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1940–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. de Marco R, Pesce G, Girardi P, Marchetti P, Rava M, Ricci P, et al. Foetal exposure to maternal stressful events increases the risk of having asthma and atopic diseases in childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(8):724–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mizuno M, Siddique K, Baum M, Smith SA. Prenatal programming of hypertension induces sympathetic overactivity in response to physical stress. Hypertension. 2013;61(1):180–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. King V, Dakin RS, Liu L, Hadoke PW, Walker BR, Seckl JR, et al. Maternal obesity has little effect on the immediate offspring but impacts on the next generation. Endocrinology. 2013;154(7):2514–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Entringer S, Buss C, Swanson JM, Cooper DM, Wing DA, Waffarn F, et al. Fetal programming of body composition, obesity, and metabolic function: the role of intrauterine stress and stress biology. J Nutr Metab. 2012;2012:632548.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ornoy A. Prenatal origin of obesity and their complications: gestational diabetes, maternal overweight and the paradoxical effects of fetal growth restriction and macrosomia. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;32(2):205–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brew BK, Marks GB, CAPS (Childhood Asthma Prevention Study) Investigators. Perinatal factors and respiratory health in children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(11):1621–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Duijts L. Fetal and infant origins of asthma. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(1):5–14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Banjanin S, Kapoor A, Matthews SG. Prenatal glucocorticoid exposure alters hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and blood pressure in mature male guinea pigs. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 1):305–18.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Portha B, Chavey A, Movassat J. Early-life origins of type 2 diabetes: fetal programming of the beta-cell mass. Exp Diabetes Res. 2011;2011:105076.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Knackstedt MK, Hamelmann E, Arck PC. Mothers in stress: consequences for the offspring. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2005;54(2):63–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nafstad P, Magnus P, Jaakkola JJ. Risk of childhood asthma and allergic rhinitis in relation to pregnancy complications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(5):867–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Warner JA, Warner JO. Early life events in allergic sensitisation. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(4):883–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Soto-Ramirez N, Karmaus W, Zhang H, Liu J, Billings D, Gangur V, et al. Fatty acids in breast milk associated with asthma-like symptoms and atopy in infancy: a longitudinal study. J Asthma. 2012;49(9):926–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wright RJ. Prenatal maternal stress and early caregiving experiences: implications for childhood asthma risk. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 Suppl 3:8–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cookson H, Granell R, Joinson C, Ben-Shlomo Y, Henderson AJ. Mothers’ anxiety during pregnancy is associated with asthma in their children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(4):847–53.e11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Priftis KN, Papadimitriou A, Anthracopoulos MB, Fretzayas A, Chrousos GP. Endocrine-immune interactions in adrenal function of asthmatic children on inhaled corticosteroids. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16(5):333–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Buske-Kirschbaum A, Ebrecht M, Hellhammer DH. Blunted HPA axis responsiveness to stress in atopic patients is associated with the acuity and severeness of allergic inflammation. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24(8):1347–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Coe CL, Kramer M, Kirschbaum C, Netter P, Fuchs E. Prenatal stress diminishes the cytokine response of leukocytes to endotoxin stimulation in juvenile rhesus monkeys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):675–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Agarwal SK, Marshall Jr GD. Glucocorticoid-induced type 1/type 2 cytokine alterations in humans: a model for stress-related immune dysfunction. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1998;18(12):1059–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Foolad N, Brezinski EA, Chase EP, Armstrong AW. Effect of nutrient supplementation on atopic dermatitis in children: a systematic review of probiotics, prebiotics, formula, and fatty acids. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(3):350–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Romero VC, Somers EC, Stolberg V, Clinton C, Chensue S, Djuric Z, et al. Developmental programming for allergy: a secondary analysis of the Mothers, omega-3, and mental health study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):316.e1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Pilkington SM, Massey KA, Bennett SP, Al-Aasswad NM, Roshdy K, Gibbs NK, et al. Randomized controlled trial of oral omega-3 PUFA in solar-simulated radiation-induced suppression of human cutaneous immune responses. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(3):646–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mizota T, Fujita-Kambara C, Matsuya N, Hamasaki S, Fukudome T, Goto H, et al. Effect of dietary fatty acid composition on Th1/Th2 polarization in lymphocytes. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33(4):390–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Furuhjelm C, Warstedt K, Larsson J, Fredriksson M, Bottcher MF, Falth-Magnusson K, et al. Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy and lactation may decrease the risk of infant allergy. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1461–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinzmann A, Mao XQ, Akaiwa M, Kreomer RT, Gao PS, Ohshima K, et al. Genetic variants of IL-13 signalling and human asthma and atopy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(4):549–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. D’Vaz N, Meldrum SJ, Dunstan JA, Martino D, McCarthy S, Metcalfe J, et al. Postnatal fish oil supplementation in high-risk infants to prevent allergy: randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):674–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer AJ, Ho CK, Ajibola O, Avenell A. The role of omega-3 fatty acid supplemented parenteral nutrition in critical illness in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):307–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Or-Rashid MM, Fisher R, Karrow N, AlZahal O, McBride BW. Plasma fatty acid profile of gestating ewes supplemented with fishmeal. Am J Anim Vet Sci. 2012;7(2):67–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Stryker JA, Fisher R, You Q, Or-Rashid MM, Boermans HJ, Quinton M, et al. Effects of dietary fish meal and soybean meal on the ovine innate and acquired immune response during pregnancy and lactation. Animal. 2013;7(1):151–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Z, Goonewardene LA. The use of MIXED models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measures data. Can J Anim Sci. 2004;84:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Fisher RE, Or’Rashid M, Quinton M, AlZahal O, Boermans HJ, McBride BW, et al. Maternal supplementation with fishmeal protects against late gestation endotoxin-induced fetal programming of the ovine hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2014;5(3):206–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ciaccio CE, Girdhar M. Effect of maternal omega3 fatty acid supplementation on infant allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;112(3):191–4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li J, Xun P, Zamora D, Sood A, Liu K, Daviglus M, et al. Intakes of long-chain omega-3 (n-3) PUFAs and fish in relation to incidence of asthma among American young adults: the CARDIA study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(1):173–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Makrides M, Gunaratne AW, Collins CT. Dietary n-3 LC-PUFA during the perinatal period as a strategy to minimize childhood allergic disease. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2013;77:155–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Park HJ, Park JS, Hayek MG, Reinhart GA, Chew BP. Dietary fish oil and flaxseed oil suppress inflammation and immunity in cats. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011;141(3–4):301–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauritzen L, Kjaer TM, Porsgaard T, Fruekilde MB, Mu H, Frokiaer H. Maternal intake of fish oil but not of linseed oil reduces the antibody response in neonatal mice. Lipids. 2011;46(2):171–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. de Matos OG, Amaral SS, Pereira da Silva PE, Perez DA, Alvarenga DM, Ferreira AV, et al. Dietary supplementation with omega-3-PUFA-rich fish oil reduces signs of food allergy in ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:236564.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Warstedt K, Furuhjelm C, Duchen K, Falth-Magnusson K, Fageras M. The effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in pregnancy on maternal eicosanoid, cytokine, and chemokine secretion. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(2):212–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Dunstan JA, Mori TA, Barden A, Beilin LJ, Taylor AL, Holt PG, et al. Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy modifies neonatal allergen-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes in infants at high risk of atopy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(6):1178–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Bazinet RP, Douglas H, McMillan EG, Wilkie BN, Cunnane SC. Dietary 18:3omega3 influences immune function and the tissue fatty acid response to antigens and adjuvant. Immunol Lett. 2004;95(1):85–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vineyard KR, Warren LK, Kivipelto J. Effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acid source on plasma and red blood cell membrane composition and immune function in yearling horses. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(1):248–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Gottrand F. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids influence the immune system of infants. J Nutr. 2008;138(9):1807S–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Han SC, Kang GJ, Ko YJ, Kang HK, Moon SW, Ann YS, et al. Fermented fish oil suppresses T helper 1/2 cell response in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis via generation of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3+ T cells. BMC Immunol. 2012;13:44.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson DS. The role of regulatory T lymphocytes in asthma pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005;5(2):136–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Saito S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;63(6):601–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Chau JT. The effect of prenatal stress on a mouse model of allergic airway disease. 2013.Google Scholar
  48. Prescott SL, Clifton V. Asthma and pregnancy: emerging evidence of epigenetic interactions in utero. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(5):417–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yessoufou A, Ple A, Moutairou K, Hichami A, Khan NA. Docosahexaenoic acid reduces suppressive and migratory functions of CD4 + CD25+ regulatory T-cells. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(12):2377–88.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Seymour BW, Friebertshauser KE, Peake JL, Pinkerton KE, Coffman RL, Gershwin LJ. Gender differences in the allergic response of mice neonatally exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Dev Immunol. 2002;9(1):47–54.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Melgert BN, Postma DS, Kuipers I, Geerlings M, Luinge MA, van der Strate BW, et al. Female mice are more susceptible to the development of allergic airway inflammation than male mice. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(11):1496–503.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Or-Rashid MM, Fisher R, Karrow N, AlZahal O, McBride BW. Fatty acid profile of colostrum and milk of ewes supplemented with fish meal and the subsequent plasma fatty acid status of their lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010;88:2092–2102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fisher-Heffernan et al. 2015