Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Veterinary Research

Open Access

Heterogeneity in the prevalence and intensity of bovine trypanosomiasis in the districts of Amuru and Nwoya, Northern Uganda

  • Harriet Angwech1Email author,
  • Jack H. P. Nyeko1,
  • Elizabeth A. Opiyo1,
  • Joseph Okello-Onen1,
  • Robert Opiro1,
  • Richard Echodu1,
  • Geoffrey M. Malinga1, 3,
  • Moses N. Njahira2 and
  • Robert A. Skilton2
BMC Veterinary Research201511:255

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0567-6

Received: 30 September 2014

Accepted: 30 September 2015

Published: 8 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Livestock trypanosomiasis, transmitted mainly by tsetse flies of the genus Glossina is a major constraint to livestock health and productivity in the sub-Saharan Africa. Knowledge of the prevalence and intensity of trypanosomiasis is important in understanding the epidemiology of the disease. The objectives of this study were to (a) assess the prevalence and intensity of trypanosome infections in cattle, and (b) to investigate the reasons for the heterogeneity of the disease in the tsetse infested districts of Amuru and Nwoya, northern Uganda.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from September, 2011 to January, 2012. Blood samples were collected from 816 cattle following jugular vein puncture, and screened for trypanosomes by HCT and ITS-PCR. A Pearson chi-squared test and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between location, age, sex, and prevalence of trypanosome infections.

Results

Out of the 816 blood samples examined, 178 (22 %) and 338 (41 %) tested positive for trypanosomiasis by HCT and ITS-PCR, respectively. Trypanosoma vivax infection accounted for 77 % of infections detected by ITS-PCR, T. congolense (16 %), T. brucei s.l (4 %) and mixed (T. vivax/ T. congolense/T.brucei) infections (3 %). The risk of trypanosome infection was significantly associated with cattle age (χ 2 = 220.4, df = 3, P < 0.001). The highest proportions of infected animals were adult males (26.7 %) and the least infected were the less than one year old calves (2.0 %). In addition, the risk of trypanosome infection was significantly associated with sex (χ 2  = 16.64, df = 1, P < 0.001), and males had a significantly higher prevalence of infections (26.8 %) than females (14.6 %).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the prevalence and intensity of trypanosome infections are highly heterogeneous being associated with cattle age, location and sex.

Keywords

CattleITS-PCRRisk factors T. brucei s.l T. congolense T. vivax Trypanosomiasis

Background

Trypanosomiasis, caused by several species of Trypanosoma, is an economically important disease affecting both humans and domestic animals. African trypanosomiasis is transmitted mainly by tsetse flies of the genus Glossina known to be distributed widely between latitudes 14°N and 29°S of the equator in 37 Sub-Saharan countries [1]. Trypanosoma vivax is also transmitted mechanically by biting flies such as Tabanus and Stomoxys. The disease excludes livestock and farming systems from about 70 % of the humid and semi-humid zones of sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Schofield and Kabayo [3] estimated the losses to Africa’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) due to trypanosomiasis infection at about 4.5 billion US dollars annually, including the approximately three million cattle deaths.

Uganda is affected by Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) caused by two Trypanosoma brucei sub-species: Trypanosoma brucei gambiense in the northwest, and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense in the southeast and northeast of the country [1]. Recent studies have shown the possibility of the two sub-species merging in the country [4]. The epidemiology of HAT is quite complex, with transmission cycles involving interactions between man, tsetse and trypanosomes, and in the case of T. b. rhodesiense disease, domestic and wild animals play a significant role as well. In cattle, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma vivax are species of economic importance.

It has been observed in previous studies that contact between blood feeding insects such as tsetse flies and their respective hosts is highly heterogeneous and non-random [57]. As a result, some hosts are bitten more than others, contributing more to the transmission of parasites. The concept of host heterogeneity has been shown to have important implications for disease transmission and to a great extent the design of disease control interventions [8, 9]. Identification of heterogeneities inherent to vector-borne disease systems is a basis for the development of local and adaptive control strategies that efficiently make use of limited resources [10].

Over the years, a number of methods for control of tsetse flies and trypanosomiasis have been developed [11]. These include, treatment of infected animals, aerial spraying, use of animal baits, sterile insect technique, clearing of tsetse infested bushes and slaughtering wild animals. In Uganda, control of trypanosomiasis relies heavily on curative treatment of livestock and the use of tsetse traps. However, there has been significant problem of parasite resistance to trypanocides [12, 13]. Yet the development of new efficacious drugs is considered unprofitable by most pharmaceutical industries considering that this is a disease that affects mainly the rural poor [14]. Thus there is need to develop adaptive control options that are suitable for the resource poor communities in the sub-Saharan Africa. This might be possible if curative treatments target infected animals only, and prophylactic and insecticide treatments target only animals that are challenged most in the herd.

Furthermore, the knowledge of the prevalence and distribution of trypanosome species in a geographical area is essential for understanding the epidemiology of the disease. This information is, however, lacking for the northern Uganda districts of Nwoya and Amuru that have suffered a setback in research due to the prolonged insurgency in the region. The objectives of this study were to (a) assess the prevalence and intensity of bovine trypanosomiasis, and (b) investigate the reason for the heterogeneity of the disease in the tsetse infested districts of Amuru and Nwoya, Uganda.

Materials and methods

Study area

This study was conducted in the districts of Amuru (02° 48' 49"N, 31° 56' 19"E) and Nwoya (02° 38'15"N, 32°00' 53"E) in northern Uganda, that borders the Murchison Falls National Park (Fig. 1). The two districts lie in the animal trypanosomiasis endemic areas and also fall within a Gambiense focus with cases of Gambian sleeping sickness reported annually [15]. Subsistence agriculture is the main economic activity of the districts, employing up to 98 % of the population. The arable land constitutes 90 % of the total land area in the districts, and is very fertile (Amuru District Development plan 2011–2016). However, during the last twenty years of prolonged insurgency, there was no form of vector control in place and less than 1 % of the land was utilized for agriculture, and as a result the area became re-invaded by tsetse and other biting flies.
Fig. 1

Location of study sites in Amuru and Nwoya districts, northern Uganda (Sampled parishes and bleeding centers). All parishes in Nwoya district included in the study border Murchison Falls National Park (i.e. they are found in the wildlife-livestock interface). Amuru’s parishes on the other hand are located in an area where the density of game animals is low and therefore, livestock constitute the main source of tsetse blood meal

The area has two rainfall periods, July to November and March to May, with a short dry spell in June and a fairly long period of dryness from December to February. The mean annual rainfall is about 1000 to 2000 mm. The average daily minimum and maximum temperatures are 25 °C and 39 °C, respectively [16]. The climate is favourable for agriculture and is conducive for the proliferation of tsetse flies, the vectors for African trypanosomiasis, with Glossina fuscipes fuscipes being a major species (99 %) (Angwech et al. unpublished observation). Both districts lie within the savannah grassland and are crossed by several rivers and streams. The population density of cattle in the area ranges between 10 and 20 individuals per square kilometer [17].

All parishes in Nwoya district included in the study border Murchison falls national park (i.e they are found in the wildlife-livestock interface), where wild animals used to wander freely in the course of the insurgency when the inhabitants lived in protected IDP camps in trading centers. Cattle are now being reintroduced as part of the national restocking and peace recovery programme of the government of Uganda. The density of livestock, as compared to game animals, is generally low. Therefore, tsetse flies largely depend on game animals for blood meals but also feed on livestock (Angwech et al., unpublished observation). Amuru’s parishes on the other hand are located in an area where the density of game animals is low and therefore, livestock constitute the main source of tsetse blood meal.

Sample size determination

The expected sample size for the number of cattle was determined using the formula provided by Kish [18] assuming a confidence interval of 95 %, a level of expected prevalence of 50 % and an assumed precision of 5 % given that there was no prior information about the prevalence of trypanosomiasis infection in the area. This approach generated an approximate sample size of 816.

Study design and sampling

A cross-sectional survey design was used to determine the prevalence and intensity of trypanosome species in cattle from September, 2011 to January, 2012. Two sub-counties of Atiak and Purongo in Amuru and Nwoya, respectively, were randomly selected for the study based on the information provided by the district veterinary departments about tsetse infestation in the area and trypanosome-attributable deaths of cattle. From these two sub-counties, nine parishes (Patira, Pawatomero, Latoro, Paromo, Pabit, Kal, Palukere, Pawel and Pacilo) were randomly selected for the study and bleeding centers were established in every parish. Cattle were categorized in to the following age groups: < 12 months; 12 to 48 months and > 48 months. Calves included in this study were only those herded together with other herds under communal grazing system. The ages of cattle were determined based on dentition [19] and information provided by the farmers. All cattle presented for bleeding at the centers were included in the study in order to realize the sample size. In total 816 blood samples (460 males, 356 females) were collected from 19 herds of cattle distributed in the nine parishes of Nwoya and Amuru districts (Patira = 81; Pawatomero = 86; Latoro = 87; Paromo = 103; Pabit = 90; Kal = 87; Palukere = 70, Pawel = 127 and Pacilo = 85).

Ethical consideration

This research was approved by the Gulu University Institutional Review Board and by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. Farmers accepted to participate in the study by signing the consent forms that were provided to them before the animals were bled. Bleeding was done by trained field veterinarians.

Blood sample collection

The animals used in this study were mainly local Boran short-horn zebu cattle under traditional communal grazing system. For each animal, whole blood sample was drawn into heparinised vacutainer tubes from the jugular vein. Four blood spots (each 120 μl) were made on a single Whatman® Classic FTA Card (Whatman Bioscience, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The spots were air-dried at ambient room temperature, and the cards stored moisture-free in silica gel awaiting DNA extraction.

Parasitological tests

Screening of all blood samples for trypanosomes was carried out using haematocrit centrifugation technique (HCT) [20], complemented with direct smears. Parasitological tests for all samples were carried out in the field immediately following blood collection. To perform HCT, three capillary tubes were filled by capillary attraction up to the ¾ mark with uncoagulated blood. Each capillary tube was then sealed at one end using plasticin, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min to obtain the buffy coat, and examined for the presence of trypanosomes under a compound microscope (Olympus, magnification × 40). For direct smears, the capillary tubes were cut with a diamond-tipped pencil, and the buffy coat was examined microscopically to detect the presence of motile trypanosomes [21]. This was done for all HCT negative samples. All parasitologically positive animals were given a single curative dose of diminazene aceturate (Berenil®, 3.5 mg kg−1 body weight). Parasitaemia scores resulting from trypanosome infections in this study were categorized for intensity using a parasitaemia score from 1 (lowest intensity) to 6 (highest intensity), adopted from ILCA [22]. Scores were assigned as follows: 1[below 10]; 2[10–20]; 3[21–30]; 4[31–40]; 5[41–50] and 6 for more than 50 parasites observed per 50 random fields of view. These values were then organized into classes to ease the analysis and interpretation of results.

DNA extraction from FTA cards

Using a Harris 3-mm micro-punch (Whatman Biosciences Ltd.), five sample discs were cut randomly from a dried blood spot and placed into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube to reduce the chance of missing out trypanosome DNA. To prevent contamination between samples, punches were cleaned after every sampling using a 5 % sodium hypochlorite and 70 % ethanol. The punch was then used to cut a clean filter paper before using it on the next sample. DNA extraction was done using the Invitrogen™ PureLink Genomic DNA kit for purification of genomic DNA (Invitrogen Inc.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and quantity were checked using nanoDrop spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis. The purified DNA sample was used immediately for PCR analyses or stored at −20 °C until use.

PCR amplification of DNA

All parasitologically positive and negative extracted DNA samples were subjected to Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS)1 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification using ITS1 CF (5’CCGGAAGTTCACCGATATTG-3’) and ITS1 BR (5’TTGCTGCGTTCTTCAACGAA-3’) as the forward and reverse primers, respectively. These primers amplify ITS1 region of rDNA genes which are known to vary in size within trypanosome species, and therefore differentiate trypanosome species by their ITS1 sizes [2325]. All primers were supplied by Bioneer Corporation. The PCR amplifications were performed in a total reaction volume of 20 μL containing 10 μM of each primer, the Bioneer AccuPower® PCR premix (Bioneer Corporation), and 2 μL of each DNA template. All PCR amplifications were performed with a thermal cycler (GeneAmp 9700 PCR system, Applied Biosystems). PCR cycling for ITS1 CF and BR primers involved an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C each for 40 s, 58 °C for 40 s, followed by 72 °C for 90 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min [25]. To ensure that results were not biased by false positives during repeated PCRs, negative controls in which DNA templates were replaced with sterile water as well as positive control DNAs (of each trypanosome species) were included in all PCR reactions. A 4.0 μL of each amplified PCR product was electrophoresed on a 1.5 % agarose gel in 0.5X TBE. A 1 Kb plus DNA size ladder (Fermentas) was included on each gel, stained in Gel Red dye, run constantly at 100 V for 45 min and visualized under ultraviolet trans-illumination. To confirm the results, the selected PCR products for positive samples were column purified using the GeneJet™ PCR purification kit (Fermentas Life Sciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was done at the BecA-ILRI Hub Sequencing, Genotyping, OligoSynthesis and Proteomics (SEGoLIP) department using both the forward and reverse amplification primers. Sequences were edited in CLC Main Workbench 6.6.5 software (CLC Bio) and blasted to determine their identity. This was done particularly because there were PCR products that produced bands which did not correspond to any known pathogenic trypanosome species band size.

Statistical analysis

A Pearson chi-squared test and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between location, age, sex, and prevalence of trypanosome infections. The threshold for significance was 5 %. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS software (version 16.0.1, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Out of the 816 blood samples screened for trypanosome infections, 178 (22 %) and 338 (41 %) animals tested positive by parasitological diagnostic tools (HCT and Direct smears) and ITS PCR, respectively. A total of 77 % of the infections detected by ITS PCR was caused by T. vivax, T. congolense (16 %), T. brucei s.l (4 %) and mixed (T. vivax/ T. congolense/T.brucei) infections (3 %). All the three T. congolense sub-types (T. congolense ‘forest’, T. congolense ‘kilifi’ and T. congolense ‘savanah’) were found infecting cattle in the study area.

Prevalence of trypanosome infections by location

There was a significant association between district location and the prevalence of trypanosome infections (χ 2  = 8.28, df = 1, P = 0.004). The risk of trypanosome infections was 2.5 times higher in Amuru than in Nwoya district. Furthermore, the prevalence of infections was significantly associated with the parish location (χ 2  = 39.59, df = 8, P < 0.001). The highest prevalence of trypanosome infections was in Pawel parish in Amuru district and the lowest was in Patira parish, Nwoya district (Fig. 2). The risk of trypanosome infections was 1.6 times higher in Pawel than in Patira parish (OR 2.60; 95 % CI: (1.36–4.98); P = 0.004).
Fig. 2

The prevalence of bovine trypanosomiasis in the nine parishes of Amuru and Nwoya districts, northern Uganda

The association between cattle age and trypanosomiasis

There was a significant association between age of cattle and the prevalence of trypanosome infections (χ 2  = 73.08, df = 2, P < 0.001). The risk of trypanosome infections was nine times higher in males above 48 months of age (OR 10.0; 95% CI: (5.6–17.9); P < 0.001) and almost six times higher in cows above 48 months of age (OR 6.1; 95 % CI: (3.8–9.1); P < 0.001) than in calves (Table 1). Furthermore, the parasitaemia scores resulting from trypanosome infections were lower in calves than in adults. Table 2 indicates that, in general, 67 % of all detected parasitaemias in calves were scored 1 or 2, i.e. less than 20 parasites observed per 50 random fields of view.
Table 1

The prevalence and relative risks of trypanosome infections in cattle of different age categories and sex

Age / sex

N

n

n (%)

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

P-value

HCT

PCR

Calves (<12 months)

133

09

09 (7)

1.0

reference

Young females (12–48 months)

136

23

48 (35)

5.1 (2.1–9.8)

< 0.001

Young males (12–48 months)

136

27

49 (36)

5.2 (2.4–10.2)

< 0.001

Cows (> 48 months)

168

48

71 (42)

6.1 (3.8–9.1)

0.001

Bulls and oxen (> 48 months)

243

71

161 (66)

10.0 (5.6–17.9)

< 0.001

Total

816

178 (22)IR-HCT

338 (41)IR-PCR

  

N number of animals examined, n number of positive animals, (%) percentage of animals infected, IR-HCT the overall infection rate by HCT, IR-PCR the overall infection rate by PCR. Calves (< 12 months) were used as a reference category

Table 2

Relative frequency (%) of parasitaemia scores for trypanosome infections in cattle of different age categories and sex in Amuru and Nwoya districts, northern Uganda

Age / Sex

N

Parasitaemia score classes (%)

1–2

3–4

5–6

Calves (< 12 months)

09

67

22

11

Young females (12–48 months)

23

43

35

22

Young males (12–48 months)

27

52

26

22

Cows (> 48 months)

48

54

25

21

Bulls and oxen (> 48 months)

71

27

17

56

N number of animals infected

The association between sex and trypanosome infections

There was a significant association between sex of cattle and trypanosome infections (χ 2  = 16.64, df = 1, P < 0.001). Males were associated with a higher risk of trypanosomiasis (26.7 %) than females (14.6 %; OR 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.36–0.68; P = 0.001).

Discussion

In the present study, we found a significant association between age of cattle and the prevalence of trypanosome infections. A higher prevalence and intensity of trypanosome infections was found in adult cattle (males and females whose ages were greater than 48 months) than in calves less than twelve months (Table 1). Similar results have been found in several previous studies [6, 2629]. This could be attributed to differences in the period of exposure to vectors between the cattle age groups [28]. In traditional grazing systems, suckling calves are restricted or grazed at homesteads and not allowed to graze with adults until weaned off [27]. This practice minimizes their chances of contact with the disease vectors when compared to adults. Additionally, calves are known to be protected by the effect of maternal immunity, which helps to keep parasitaemia low to almost undetectable levels [30]. This is further confirmed by the findings of this study, where up to 67 % of infected calves had lowest parasitaemia scores (Table 2). The association between the prevalence of trypanosome infections and age of cattle might also be explained by differences in the attractiveness of animals of different ages to tsetse flies [7]. Studies on host preference have shown that tsetse flies are attracted most to odours of larger or older animals and least to calves [31].

The findings from this study have also indicated a significant association between sex and prevalence of trypanosome infections. Males had a significantly higher prevalence and risk of trypanosome infection than female cattle. The finding is consistent with Magona et al. [32] who showed that male cattle had a significantly higher prevalence of trypanosomes than females. In contrast, other studies [29, 32, 33] found no significant differences in the prevalence of trypanosome infections between males and females. Magona et al. [32] attributed this variation to the functional status of the animal such as being draught ox due to heavy stress from their use in ploughing. This stress condition might contribute to increased susceptibility of male animals to trypanosome infections.

Trypanosoma vivax was found to predominate in the study area and contributed up to 77 % of infections in cattle. This is in agreement with the findings of Magona et al. [34] who also indicated T. vivax as the most predominant trypanosome species in the Glossina fuscipes fuscipes infested areas. This could be explained by the vectorial capacity of G. fuscipes fuscipes [35] that accounts for over 90 % of tsetse species infesting the study area (Angwech et al. unpublished observation). Earlier studies have reported differences in vector competence and ability to transmit trypanosomes particularly between G. f. fuscipes and G. pallidipes. Glossina f. fuscipes reported to be a poorer transmitter of T. congolense than G. pallidipes was shown to have a higher transmission index for T. vivax compared to G. pallidipes [35]. In addition, T. vivax is known to have the shortest life cycle among all the trypanosome species recorded so far [36]. The predominance of T. vivax in the study area is consistent with the findings of several previous studies in Uganda [29, 37, 38]. The two districts are currently under the cattle restocking progamme of the government of Uganda and support of the non-governmental organizations working in the region. The fact that all the three types of T. congolense were detected in cattle is not surprising. This could be due to the importation of infected animals from other geographical areas through the restocking programme [15].

ITS-PCR detected a higher prevalence of trypanosome infections (41 %) compared to parasitological tests; Haematocrit centrifuge technique (22 %). Haematocrit centrifuge technique is limited by having a low resolution and sensitivity that require a high threshold of detection of trypanosomes. PCR on the other hand, has a high sensitivity and specificity that considerably reduces the threshold levels of detection of infection to as low as one trypanosome per milliliter of blood [39, 40]. Besides, both districts are found in a trypanosomiasis endemic focus where most of the infections present in a chronic form characterized by low parasitaemia in which case PCR would be two to three times more sensitive. This further confirms the importance of PCR in epidemiological studies over parasitological methods.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that the prevalence and intensity of trypanosomiasis infections are highly heterogeneous being associated with cattle age, sex and location.

Limitations of the study

The major limitations of this study were: firstly, it was not possible to document the enrolment of cattle or where they were brought from into the study area after the insurgency/conflicts. This was partly because some farmers who received the animals as donations from the support NGOs and the government did not know exactly where they came from.

Secondly, only the parasitologically positive animals were treated with a curative dose of diminazene aceturate due to the limited number of personnel involved in the field data collection and also due to the delay in PCR identification of the parasites.

Thirdly, even though PCR yielded bands which never corresponded to any known pathogenic trypanosome species band size were identified as trypanosomes, their profiles were different from the wild profile, and thus we recommend further investigation using more sensitive methods such as PCR- restriction fragment length polymorphism which are able to detect intra-species as well as interspecies variation to clarify this situation.

Notes

Abbreviations

ITS-PCR: 

Internal Transcribed Spacer - Polymerase Chain Reaction

HAT: 

Human African Trypanosomiasis

HCT: 

Haematocrit Centrifugation Technique

BecA-ILRI: 

Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa – International Livestock Research Institute

SEGoLIP: 

Sequencing, Genotyping, Oligosynthesis and Proteomics

MSI: 

Millennium Science Initiative

TBE buffer: 

Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the veterinary departments of the two districts for their support during field data collection. Thanks also go to the farmers for providing the animals for the study. We are grateful to Ms. Margaret Akol and Mr. Odyek Godfrey for their technical assistance both in the field and in the laboratory. This project was supported financially by Gulu University MSI Trypanosome Diagnostic Project and the African Biosciences Challenge Fund (A.H). We are also indebted to Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa (BecA) – ILRI Hub, Nairobi for providing laboratory space and facilities for molecular analysis of the samples.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gulu University
(2)
Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa (BecA), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) - Hub
(3)
Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland

References

  1. Ford LB. Civil conflict and sleeping sickness in Africa in general and Uganda in particular. Confl Health. 2007;1:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksoy S. Control of tsetse flies and trypanosomes using molecular genetics. Vet Parasitol. 2003;115:125–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schofield CJ, Kabayo JP. Trypanosomiasis vector control in Africa and Latin America. Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Picozzi K, Fevre EM, Odiit M, Carrington M, Eisler MC, Maudlin I, et al. Sleeping sickness in Uganda: a thin line between two fatal diseases. BMJ. 2005;331:1238–41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kelly DW. Why are some people bitten more than others? Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:578–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Simukoko H, Marcotty T, Phiri I, Geysen D, Vercruysse J, Van den Bossche P. Heterogeneity in the trypanosomosis incidence of Zebu cattle of different ages and sex on the plateau of Eastern Zambia. Acta Trop. 2007;103:98–101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stoddard ST, Morrison AC, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Soldan VP, Kochel TJ, Kitron U, et al. The role of human movement in the transmission of vector-borne pathogens. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Woolhouse MEJ, Dye C, Etard JF, Smith T, Charlwood JD, Garnett GP, et al. Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94:338–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kilpatrick AM, Daszak P, Jones MJ, Marra PP, Kramer LD. Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:2327–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambrechts L, Knox TB, Wong J, Liebman KA, Albright RG, Stoddard ST. Shifting priorities in vector biology to improve control of vector-borne disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:1505–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kabayo JP. Aiming to eliminate tsetse from Africa. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:473–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Joshua RA, Obwolo MJ, Bwangamoi O, Mandebvu E. Resistance to diminazine aceturate by Trypanosoma congolense from cattle in the Zambezi Valley of Zimbabwe. Vet Parasitol. 1995;60:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Delespaux V, Geysen D, Van den Bossche P, Geerts S. Molecular tools for the rapid detection of drug resistance in animal trypanosomes. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:236–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McNeil D. Drug companies and third world: a case study in Neglect. New York: New York Times; 2000.Google Scholar
  15. Selby R, Bardosh K, Picozzi K, Waiswa C, Welburn SC. Cattle movements and Trypanosomes: restocking efforts and the spread of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense sleeping sickness in post-conflict Uganda. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA). State of the Environment Report for Uganda. Kampala: National Environment Management Authority (NEMA); 2012.Google Scholar
  17. PAATIS. Programme Against African Trypanosomiasis: options for tsetse eradication in the moist Savannah Zone of West Africa. Technical and economic feasibility phase 1, GIS-based study. 2001:13. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/Tsetse-eradication-west-africa.pdf. Accessed 10 September, 2011.
  18. Kish L. Survey sampling. London: New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1968.Google Scholar
  19. De-Lahunta A, Hable RE. Applied veterinary anatomy. USA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1986.Google Scholar
  20. Woo PTK. The haematocrit centrifugation technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis. Acta Trop. 1970;27:384–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. OIE Terrestrial Manual, Chapter 2.4.18, Trypanosomosis (tsetse-transmitted). 2008 http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.04.18_TRYPANOSOMOSIS.pdf. Accessed 02 September, 2011.
  22. ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa). The African Trypanotolerant Livestock Network. Indications from results 1983-1985. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia: ILCA; 1986. p. 138.Google Scholar
  23. Desquesnes M, McLaughlin G, Zoungrana A, Dávila AM. Detection and identification of Trypanosoma of African livestock through a single PCR based on internal transcribed spacer 1 of rDNA. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31:610–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Desquesnes M, Ravel S, Cuny G. PCR identification of Trypanosoma lewisi, a common parasite of laboratory rats. Kinetoplastid Biol Dis. 2002;1:2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Njiru ZK, Constantine CC, Guya S, Crowther J, Kiragu JM, Thompson RC, et al. The use of ITS1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasitol Res. 2005;95:186–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowlands GJ, Woudyalew M, Authie E, d’ieteren GDM, Leak SGA, Nagda SM, et al. Epidemiology of bovine trypanosomiasis in the Ghibe valley, southwest Ethiopia. 2. Factors associated with variations in trypanosome prevalence, incidence of new infections and prevalence of recurrent infections. Acta Trop. 1993;53:135–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Magona JW, Gereiner M, Mehlitz D. Impact of tsetse control on the age-specific prevalence of trypanosomosis in village cattle in Southeast Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2000;32:87–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Alemayehu B, Bogale B, Fentahun T, Chanie M. Bovine trypanosomiasis: a threat to cattle production in Chena district. Southwest Ethiopia. Open J Anim Sci. 2012;2:287–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Biryomumaisho S, Melville SE, Katunguka-Rwakishaya E, Cailleau A, Lubega GW. Livestock trypanosomes in Uganda: Parasite heterogeneity and anaemia status of naturally infected cattle, goats and pigs. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:1443–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiennes R. Pathogenesis and Pathology of Animal trypanosomiasis. In: Mulligan HW, editor. The African Trypanosomiases. London: Allen and Unwin; 1970. p. 729–50.Google Scholar
  31. Torr SJ, Wangwiro TNC, Hall DR. The effect of host physiology on the attraction of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) and stomoxys (Diptera: Muscidae) to cattle. Bull Ent Res. 2006;96:71–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Magona JW, Walubengo J, Odimin JT. Acute haemorrhagic syndrome of bovine trypanosomosis in Uganda. Acta Trop. 2008;107:186–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fasanmi OG, Okoroafor UP, Nwufoh OC, Bokola-Oladele OM, Ajibola ES. Survey for Trypanosoma species in cattle from three farms in Iddo local Government Area, Oyo state. Sokoto J Vet Sci. 2014;12:57–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Magona JW, Walubengo J, Odiit M, Okedi LA, Abila P, Katabazi BK, et al. Implications of the re-invasion of Southeast Uganda by Glossina pallidipes on the epidemiology of bovine trypanosomosis. Vet Parasitol. 2005;128:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moloo SK, Kutuza SB, Boreham PFL. Studies on Glossina pallidipes, G. fuscipes fuscipes and G. brevipalpis in terms of the epidemiology and epizootiology of trypanosomiasis in South-eastern Uganda. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1980;74:219–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jordan AM. Recent Development in the ecology and methods of control of tsetse flies (Glossina species (Diptera: Glossinidae)): a review. Bull Entomol Res. 1974;67:523–74.Google Scholar
  37. Waiswa C, Olaho-Mukani W, Katunguka-Rwakishaya E. Domestic animals as reservoirs for sleeping sickness in three endemic foci in south eastern Uganda. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003;97:149–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Waiswa C, Picozzi K, Katunguka-Rwakishaya E, Olaho-Mukani W, Musoke RA, Welburn SC. Glossina fuscipes fuscipes in the trypanosomiasis endemic areas of south eastern Uganda: Apparent density, trypanosome infection rates and host feeding preferences. Acta Trop. 2006;99:23–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Penchenier L, Dumas V, Grébaut P, Reifemberg JM, Cuny G. Improvement of blood and fly gut processing for diagnosis of trypanosomosis. Parasite. 1996;4:387–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Thumbi SM, McOdimba FA, Mosi RO, Jung’a JO. Comparative evaluation of three PCR based diagnostic assays for the detection of pathogenic trypanosomes in cattle blood. Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:46–50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Angwech et al. 2015

Advertisement